Pollution in Canada

Last updated

Leduc oil Leduc oil.jpg
Leduc oil

Pollution is an environmental issue in Canada. It has posed health risks to the Canadian population and is an area of concern for Canadian lawmakers. Air, water and soil pollution as well as the associated health effects are prominent points of contention in modern Canadian society.

Contents

Air pollution

Air pollution in Canada is contributed by industrial and vehicular emissions, agriculture, construction, wood burning, and energy production. [1] Ongoing monitoring of Canada's Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory shows that 14 of the 17 of the air pollutants monitored are decreasing compared to historical levels. 2019 data shows that Canada is expected to meet or exceed it's emission reduction commitments for 2020, as per the amended Gothenburg Protocol. [2]

Oil sands pollution

While overall pollution levels have dropped, it was found that oil sand pollution has increased by 20% since 2009. [3] [4] Tar sands facilities were found to be among the top four highest polluters of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)- a major air contaminant. [4] VOCs and other air contaminants are set to increase in the future as a result of continued output from the oil sands. [4] Oil sand pollution is not only set to increase VOCs, but also, acid rain. [5] Acid rain is rain that has been contaminated by airborne chemicals, making it acidic. [6] Two major causes of acid rain are sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide. [7] Acid rain can cause damage to soil, water, wildlife, plants and buildings. Additionally, the airborne particles that cause acid rain can also contribute to smog. [7] In recent years progress has been made in reducing acid rain, however, Alberta's oil sands may soon set back this progress.

Pollution from oil wells

In southeastern Saskatchewan, air pollution from oil production has breached provincial air quality standards hundreds of times since 2014. [8]

Canada/United States transboundary pollution

In recent years, the Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement, signed on 13 March 1992, has improved air quality by reducing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions in both countries. [9] The agreement was meant to address the issue of transnational air pollution between the two countries. The agreement was expanded in 2000 to also include goals of reducing emissions of volatile organic compounds and levels of ground-level ozone. [9] Ground-level ozone is caused by reactions between nitrogen oxides and VOCs in the presence of sunlight. Ozone is a contributor to smog and is known to cause numerous respiratory diseases. [10] The 2012 Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement Progress Report found that "Canada's total emissions of sulfur dioxide have decreased by 57% from 1990 levels while the U.S. has reduced total sulfur dioxide emissions from covered sources by 67% from their 1990 emission levels. Between 2000 and 2010, Canada reduced total emissions of nitrogen oxides by 40% in the transboundary ozone region while U.S. total nitrogen oxide emissions decreased by 42% in the region". [11]

While transnational pollution between the United States and Canada has decreased many Canadians still say they contend with polluted air as a result of drifting pollution from the U.S. Approximately 70% of the air pollution in Canada comes from the United States. [12] In 2006 the government of Ontario announced that "5,000 premature deaths caused by smog in the province every year can be attributed to air pollution that crosses the Canada-U.S. border." [13] Additionally, the then (2006) mayor of Halifax, Peter Kelley, also proclaimed "over 50 per cent of air pollutants over New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are from the U.S. For us, we're trying to deal with what's coming our way, but also what we generate here as well." [13] In an attempt to combat the pollution a petition was created. In 2006 the petition was filed by thirteen Canadian municipalities to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calling for a reduction in coal-fired plants. [13]

Climate Change Accountability Act

The Climate Change Accountability Act called for greenhouse gas emissions to be 25% below 1990 levels by 2021, and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Although the bill was passed by the House of Commons, the bill was defeated by the Senate. Environment Minister Jim Prentice stated in early 2010 that the new goal for greenhouse gas emissions would be 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, the equivalent of a 3% increase from 1990. [14]

Water pollution

While most of Canada's surface and ground water is generally clean there is some local and regional water pollution that can be caused by "industrial and municipal discharge, runoff, spills, and deposition of airborne pollutants". [15] Contaminated water can result in a myriad of serious consequences for human health.

Oil sands pollution

As previously stated, Alberta's oil sands are set to cause growing levels of acid rain consequentially leading to an increase in water contamination in the area. Acid rain will cause Canada's lakes and rivers to become further acidified. This is a problem as it decreases levels of surface water calcium. This lower concentration of calcium is already having particularly adverse effects on plant life, as can be seen with the Daphnia species-an important food source for aquatic species and marine life. [16]

A recent study at the University of Alberta found levels of metals like arsenic, lead and mercury to be considerably higher than national guidelines in water downstream from Albertan oil sites. [17] This pollution could potentially result in harmful health implications for fish and other wildlife. [17] The study further discerned that their findings were "contrary to claims made by industry and government" who purported that "pollutants are from natural sources and not from the expanding production of oil from tar sands." [17]

Other than contributing to acid rain and high levels of metals in water, sites of oil production can also cause significant damage by human error and runoff. A prominent example is the 2007 case involving the Athabasca River. Due to human error, energy magnate Suncor spilled 9.8 million liters of oil sands waste water into the river causing adverse effects for people and wildlife in the area. [4] The Athabasca River can also be used as an example of oil sands runoff. It was found that the Athabasca's waters, which are downstream from the oil sands, had higher concentrations of pollutants as a result of runoff. [18] High concentrations of pollutants can have serious consequences for wildlife and humans. Recently, it was reported that there were significant increases in fish deformities as well as an increase in cancer rates in a Native community downstream from the Athabasca. [19]

Great Lakes pollution

Pollution of the Great Lakes, the world's biggest bodies of fresh water, [20] continue to be a significant problem for both Canada and the United States. According to Derek Stack, executive director of Great Lakes United, "High pollution levels in the Great Lakes basin continue to take an apparent toll on the air and water quality of the ecosystem." [21] In 2002, it was reported that the Great Lakes basin was home to 45% of all toxic air pollution in Canada, in turn affecting the Great Lakes' water. [22] An even more recent report suggests that the Alberta oil sands' impact could reach as far as the Great Lakes. [23] The report warns that "[oil] refineries will be using the Great Lakes 'as a cheap supply' source for their copious water needs and the area’s air 'as a pollution dump'." [23]

Sulphur dioxide emissions have also contributed to the acidity in Canada's Lakes. The thousands of lakes in Canada (including the Great Lakes) have an average pH of 5, which is harmfully acidic for aquatic life in these lakes. [12]

In September 2012, the United States and Canada signed an amended version of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. [24] The overarching purpose of the Agreement is to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters". [24] Significant amendments made to the Agreement include "address[ing] aquatic invasive species, habitat degradation and the effects of climate change, and support continued work on existing threats to people's health and the environment in the Great Lakes Basin such as harmful algae, toxic chemicals, and discharges from other vessels". [24] However, some people contend that the changes made to the Agreement while good in principle, lack the "hard number goals, and actions to reach them." [25]

Arctic waters pollution

Under the 1970 Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Canadian government established a document to prevent pollution of Canadian Arctic waters. However, in recent years Arctic waters have become increasingly polluted. It was recently found that due to pollution some waters have levels of lead that are higher than the Canadian guidelines. [26]

Coastal communities that emit waste also contribute to arctic pollution. Arctic coastal communities do not presently have the infrastructure necessary to properly deal with their waste, this could lead to greater pollution in the future as these communities continue to grow in size. [26] Other than coastal communities, waste and litter from the rest of the world continues to be a significant issue in the Arctic, with waste levels doubling in the past ten years. [27] The most significant types of litter found are plastic items and plastic bags. [27]

Pollution from sewage

The Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality are guidelines for drinking water quality standards in Canada developed by Health Canada. These guidelines set forth recommendations for the maximum concentrations of various substances in drinking water. Provinces and territories are responsible for enforcing these guidelines, as there is no national regulatory body for drinking water. [28] Water pollution by sewage is one of the main culprits involved in polluting drinking water. [29] Advocacy group Ecojustice estimates overall raw sewage dumping in Canada to be around 200 billion litres a year. [30] The Canadian government recently announced waste water regulations that would allow for sewage to be dumped into Canadian waters until 2040. [31] Proper measures for waste water disposal will not immediately be put in place, rather, they will be implemented gradually from 2020 to 2040. However, in the meantime, Canadian municipalities may continue to pollute their waters by dumping sewage. This can prominently be viewed with Halifax, Nova Scotia. In Halifax, human waste is dumped directly into the Halifax harbour. [30] This dumping can mainly be attributed to a failure in their sewage treatment infrastructure. [30] Victoria, British Columbia also follows a similar practice by getting rid of their untreated waste into the ocean. [30] However, the government has plans to open operational treatment facilities for 2016. [30]

Water pollution resulting from sewage can also be attributed to error in sewage facilities. A recent example can be evidenced with Ottawa. In 2004 Ottawa experienced a 190 million liter raw sewage spill into the Ottawa River. [32] Similarly, Winnipeg, released "partially treated sewage water into the Red River for seven weeks" in 2011. [33] However, in this case, the city was actually charged for their pollution. [33] Numerous other places like Richmond B.C and Calgary A.B, have experienced significant sewage spills in their native waters. [32]

Soil pollution

While soil pollution is present in Canada, it is not yet an area of great national concern. Some of the main causes of soil pollution include chemical/oil spills into the ground, road salt, excessive pesticide use by farmers, acid rain, and polluted water. [34]

Soil degradation/pollution

Acid Deposition is a leading cause of soil degradation. The acidic particles from pollutants become part of soil, harming the pH with such low acidity and therefore harming the organisms that live within the soil. [35] As Environment Canada mentions "soil degradation degrades the land and places significant stress on ecologically sensitive biota and flora". [36] Soil degradation in Canada's biologically sensitive forests as a result of pollution, is one of the most significant cases of degradation in the country. One study found that 12% of Alberta's forests' soils are over their acid carrying capacity. [37] This rise in acidity is attributed to the continual extraction of fossil fuel from the Alberta oil sands. [37] Oil refinery sites, like those found in Alberta, have become some of the most dominant contributors to Canadian soil pollution. A further example can be witnessed in Calgary, where a neighbourhood built on an old Imperial Oil refinery needed their soil replaced due to contamination. [38]

Road salt pollution

As a result of Canada's icy winters, salt is needed in order to deice slippery roads. The primary ingredient of road salt is sodium chloride. [39] Road salt, while helping cars and people to gain traction in the winter, can have serious consequences for soil. As National Geographic found, "Road salt can pollute soil at every stage in the deicing process." [39] This pollution is a result of numerous factors such as runoff, application and spray from vehicles. [39] In Canada, there has been research that shows that "salt run-off from roads can increase local chloride levels to between 100 and 4,000 times normal levels." [40] Salt can have adverse effects on soil and soil composition. Significant levels of chloride (one of the main components in salt) can "alter the soil 's pH chemistry and elevate levels of heavy metal pollutants, while at the same time causing a loss of soil structure and killing off micro-organisms". [40] These effects can have dire consequences for plants rendering them unable to grow or stunting their growth. [40]

PCB pollution

Salt and oil refineries are not the only contaminants of soil. Polychlorinated biphenyls or PCBs also pollute the soil. PCBs are released into the environment through "spills, leaks from electrical and other equipment, and improper disposal and storage". [41] However, recently it was found that household weeds were able to remove PCBs from contaminated soil. A study found that "the weeds stored PCBs in their shoots and could be harvested for disposal cutting the need to expensively remove and incinerate contaminated soil". [42]

Plastic pollution

The Canadian federal government formed a current institution that protects marine areas; this includes the mitigation of plastic pollution. In 1997, Canada adopted legislation for oceans management and passed the Oceans Act. [43] Federal governance, Regional Governance, and Aboriginal Peoples are the actors involved in the process of decision-making and implementation of the decision. The Regional Governance bodies are federal, provincial, and territorial government agencies that hold responsibilities of the marine environment. Aboriginal Peoples in Canada have treaty and non-treaty rights related to ocean activities. According to the Canadian government, they respect these rights and work with Aboriginal groups in oceans management activities. [43]

With the Oceans Act made legal, Canada made a commitment to conserve and protect the oceans. The Ocean Acts' underlying principle is sustainable development, precautionary and integrated management approach to ensure that there is a comprehensive understanding in protecting marine areas. In the integrated management approach, the Oceans Act designates federal responsibility to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada for any new and emerging ocean-related activities. [43] The Act encourages collaboration and coordination within the government that unifies interested parties. Moreover, the Oceans Act engages any Canadians who are interested in being informed of the decision-making regarding ocean environment.

In 2005, federal organizations developed the Federal Marine Protected Areas Strategy. [43] This strategy is a collaborative approach implemented by Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Parks Canada, and Environment Canada to plan and manage federal marine protected areas. The federal marine protected areas work with Aboriginal groups, industries, academia, environmental groups, and NGOs to strengthen marine protected areas. The federal marine protected areas network consists of three core programs: Marine Protected Areas, Marine Wildlife Areas, and National Marine Conservation Areas. [43] The MPA is a program to be noted because it is significant in protecting ecosystems from the effects of industrial activities. The MPA guiding principles are Integrated Management, ecosystem-based management approach, Adaptive Management Approach, Precautionary Principle, and Flexible Management Approach. [43] All five guiding principles are used collectively and simultaneously to collaborate and respect legislative mandates of individual departments, to use scientific knowledge and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) to manage human activities, to monitor and report on programs to meet conservation objectives of MPAs, to use best available information in the absence of scientific certainty, and to maintain a balance between conservation needs and sustainable development objectives. [43]

In 2021, the government of Canada officially added plastic manufactured items to a list of toxic substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 . [44] Later in 2021, the government moved forward on regulations to ban single-use plastics, namely checkout bags, cutlery, foodservice ware made from or containing problematic plastics, ring carrier, stir sticks and most straws. [45]

Health effects of pollution

Pollution is associated with numerous negative health effects in humans.

Air pollution

Air pollution has been shown to negatively effect humans' cardiovascular and respiratory systems. [46] Lung tissue can be damaged with direct exposure to air pollutants such as ozone, potentially causing lung inflammation and impairment of lung function. [46] As Environment Canada mentions "impacts from exposure can range from "minor breathing problems to premature death". [47] Some of the main respiratory diseases caused by air pollution include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer. [48] Specific cardiovascular disease and problems caused by air pollution include heart attack, hypertension, inflammation around the heart, stroke and arrhythmias. [49]

Health Canada estimates that 5,900 Canadians die every year from air pollution. [50] A 2008 study by the Canadian Medical Association estimated that almost 3,000 Canadians die annually from short-term exposure to air pollution, while another 18,000 die annually due to long-term effects of polluted air. The study estimated the economic impact of air pollution to be at $8 billion, including lost productivity, health care costs, deaths and a decrease in quality of life. [51]

Soil pollution

Soil pollution also causes numerous diseases. Some of the most prominent are cancer, kidney disease, liver disease, dysentery, skin infections, and stomach infections. [52]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acid rain</span> Rain that is unusually acidic

Acid rain is rain or any other form of precipitation that is unusually acidic, meaning that it has elevated levels of hydrogen ions. Most water, including drinking water, has a neutral pH that exists between 6.5 and 8.5, but acid rain has a pH level lower than this and ranges from 4–5 on average. The more acidic the acid rain is, the lower its pH is. Acid rain can have harmful effects on plants, aquatic animals, and infrastructure. Acid rain is caused by emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which react with the water molecules in the atmosphere to produce acids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollutant</span> Substance or energy damaging to the environment

A pollutant or novel entity is a substance or energy introduced into the environment that has undesired effects, or adversely affects the usefulness of a resource. These can be both naturally forming or anthropogenic in origin. Pollutants result in environmental pollution or become public health concerns when they reach a concentration high enough to have significant negative impacts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollution</span> Introduction of contaminants that cause adverse change

Pollution is the introduction of contaminants into the natural environment that cause adverse change. Pollution can take the form of any substance or energy. Pollutants, the components of pollution, can be either foreign substances/energies or naturally occurring contaminants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution</span> Contamination of water bodies

Water pollution is the contamination of water bodies, with a negative impact on their uses. It is usually a result of human activities. Water bodies include lakes, rivers, oceans, aquifers, reservoirs and groundwater. Water pollution results when contaminants mix with these water bodies. Contaminants can come from one of four main sources. These are sewage discharges, industrial activities, agricultural activities, and urban runoff including stormwater. Water pollution may affect either surface water or groundwater. This form of pollution can lead to many problems. One is the degradation of aquatic ecosystems. Another is spreading water-borne diseases when people use polluted water for drinking or irrigation. Water pollution also reduces the ecosystem services such as drinking water provided by the water resource.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Lakes Areas of Concern</span> Geographical region in the Great Lakes that show environmental degradation

Great Lakes Areas of Concern are designated geographic areas within the Great Lakes Basin that show severe environmental degradation. There are a total of 43 areas of concern within the Great Lakes, 26 being in the United States, 12 in Canada, and five shared by the two countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonpoint source pollution</span> Pollution resulting from multiple sources

Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution refers to diffuse contamination of water or air that does not originate from a single discrete source. This type of pollution is often the cumulative effect of small amounts of contaminants gathered from a large area. It is in contrast to point source pollution which results from a single source. Nonpoint source pollution generally results from land runoff, precipitation, atmospheric deposition, drainage, seepage, or hydrological modification where tracing pollution back to a single source is difficult. Nonpoint source water pollution affects a water body from sources such as polluted runoff from agricultural areas draining into a river, or wind-borne debris blowing out to sea. Nonpoint source air pollution affects air quality, from sources such as smokestacks or car tailpipes. Although these pollutants have originated from a point source, the long-range transport ability and multiple sources of the pollutant make it a nonpoint source of pollution; if the discharges were to occur to a body of water or into the atmosphere at a single location, the pollution would be single-point.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Environment (South Korea)</span>

The Ministry of Environment is the South Korea branch of government charged with environmental protection. In addition to enforcing regulations and sponsoring ecological research, the Ministry manages the national parks of South Korea. Its headquarters is in Sejong City.

Environmental issues in Canada include impacts of climate change, air and water pollution, mining, logging, and the degradation of natural habitats. As one of the world's significant emitters of greenhouse gasses, Canada has the potential to make contributions to curbing climate change with its environmental policies and conservation efforts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollution in California</span> Overview of pollution in the U.S. state of California

Pollution in California relates to the degree of pollution in the air, water, and land of the U.S. state of California. Pollution is defined as the addition of any substance or any form of energy to the environment at a faster rate than it can be dispersed, diluted, decomposed, recycled, or stored in some harmless form. The combination of three main factors is the cause of notable unhealthy levels of air pollution in California: the activities of over 39 million people, a mountainous terrain that traps pollution, and a warm climate that helps form ozone and other pollutants. Eight of the ten cities in the US with the highest year-round concentration of particulate matter between 2013 and 2015 were in California, and seven out of the ten cities in the US with the worst ozone pollution were also in California. Studies show that pollutants prevalent in California are linked to several health issues, including asthma, lung cancer, birth complications, and premature death. In 2016, Bakersfield, California recorded the highest level of airborne pollutants of any city in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nutrient pollution</span> Contamination of water by excessive inputs of nutrients

Nutrient pollution, a form of water pollution, refers to contamination by excessive inputs of nutrients. It is a primary cause of eutrophication of surface waters, in which excess nutrients, usually nitrogen or phosphorus, stimulate algal growth. Sources of nutrient pollution include surface runoff from farm fields and pastures, discharges from septic tanks and feedlots, and emissions from combustion. Raw sewage is a large contributor to cultural eutrophication since sewage is high in nutrients. Releasing raw sewage into a large water body is referred to as sewage dumping, and still occurs all over the world. Excess reactive nitrogen compounds in the environment are associated with many large-scale environmental concerns. These include eutrophication of surface waters, harmful algal blooms, hypoxia, acid rain, nitrogen saturation in forests, and climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health and environmental impact of the petroleum industry</span>

The environmental impact of the petroleum industry is extensive and expansive due to petroleum having many uses. Crude oil and natural gas are primary energy and raw material sources that enable numerous aspects of modern daily life and the world economy. Their supply has grown quickly over the last 150 years to meet the demands of the rapidly increasing human population, creativity, knowledge, and consumerism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air pollution in Canada</span> Overview of the air pollution in Canada

Air pollution is the release of pollutants into the air that are detrimental to human health and the Earth. In Canada, air pollution is regulated by standards set by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), an inter-governmental body of federal, provincial and territorial Ministers responsible for the environment. Air pollution from the United States and to lesser extent Canada; caused by metal smelting, coal-burning for utilities, and vehicle emissions has resulted in acid rain, has severely impacted Canadian waterways, forest growth, and agricultural productivity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution in the United States</span> Overview of water pollution in the United States of America

Water pollution in the United States is a growing problem that became critical in the 19th century with the development of mechanized agriculture, mining, and industry, although laws and regulations introduced in the late 20th century have improved water quality in many water bodies. Extensive industrialization and rapid urban growth exacerbated water pollution as a lack of regulation allowed for discharges of sewage, toxic chemicals, nutrients and other pollutants into surface water.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S.–Canada Air Quality Agreement</span> Environmental accord

The Air Quality Agreement is an environmental treaty between Canada and the United States. It was signed on 13 March 1991 by Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney and American President George H. W. Bush and entered into force immediately. It was popularly referred to during its negotiations as the "Acid Rain Treaty", especially in Canada. The treaty aimed at reducing toxic air pollutants primarily responsible for causing acid rain, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide. Negotiations began in 1986 when Mulroney first discussed the issue with then-president Reagan. Mulroney repeatedly pressed the issue in public meetings with Reagan in 1987 and 1988

The Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada, hereinafter referred to as "the Parties",

Convinced that transboundary air pollution can cause significant harm to natural resources of vital environmental, cultural and economic importance, and to human health in both countries; Desiring that emissions of air pollutants from sources within their countries not result in significant transboundary air pollution; Convinced that transboundary air pollution can effectively be reduced through cooperative or coordinated action providing for controlling emissions of air pollutants in both countries; Recalling the efforts they have made to control air pollution and the improved air quality that has resulted from such efforts in both countries; Intending to address air-related issues of a global nature, such as climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion, in other fora; Reaffirming Principle 21 of the Stockholm Declaration, which provides that "States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction";

Noting their tradition of environmental cooperation as reflected in the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, the Trail Smelter Arbitration of 1941, the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended, the Memorandum of Intent Concerning Transboundary Air Pollution of 1980, the 1986 Joint Report of the Special Envoys on Acid Rain, as well as the ECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution of 1979;

Convinced that a healthy environment is essential to assure the well-being of present and future generations in Canada and the United States, as well as of the global community;

Have agreed as follows: ...

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freshwater acidification</span> Acidification of freshwater by rain

Freshwater acidification occurs when acidic inputs enter a body of fresh water through the weathering of rocks, invasion of acidifying gas, or by the reduction of acid anions, like sulfate and nitrate within a lake. Freshwater acidification is primarily caused by sulfur oxides (SOx) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) entering the water from atmospheric depositions and soil leaching. Carbonic acid and dissolved carbon dioxide can also enter freshwaters, in a similar manner associated with runoff, through carbon dioxide-rich soils. Runoff that contains these compounds may incorporate acidifying hydrogen ions and inorganic aluminum, which can be toxic to marine organisms. Acid rain is also a contributor to freshwater acidification. It is created when SOx and NOx react with water, oxygen, and other oxidants within the clouds.

Environmental issues in Toronto encompasses all those concerns and opportunities presented by the environment of Toronto. Many are harmful effects, such as the pollution of air and water, while others are factors influenced by urban infrastructures such as highways and public transportation services. As a result of the city's large population, substantial waste is produced annually.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution in Canada</span> Overview of water pollution in Canada

Water pollution in Canada is generally local and regional in water-rich Canada, and most Canadians have "access to sufficient, affordable, and safe drinking water and adequate sanitation." Water pollution in Canada is caused by municipal sewage, urban runoff, industrial pollution and industrial waste, agricultural pollution, inadequate water infrastructure. This is a long-term threat in Canada due to "population growth, economic development, climate change, and scarce fresh water supplies in certain parts of the country."

Pollution in Korea has become diversified and serious due to rapid industrialization and urbanization since the 1960s. The causes of environmental pollution, both in South and North Korea, can be found in population growth, urban concentration, and industrial structure, similar to the rest of the world.

References

  1. "Air Pollution in Canada – Is It Possible?". World Weather Travelers Guide.com. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
  2. "Canada's Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory Report" (PDF). Government of Canada. Government of Canada. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  3. "Canada leaves out rise in oil sands pollution from UN report". The National Post. 30 May 2011. Retrieved 21 October 2012.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Timoney, Kevin; Peter Lee (2009). "Does the Alberta Tar Sands Industry Pollute? The Scientific Evidence". The Open Conservation Biology Journal. 3: 65–81. doi: 10.2174/1874839200903010065 . mirror
  5. "Oilsands to exceed Alberta's new pollution limits, say documents". CBC. The Canadian Press. 11 September 2012.
  6. "Acid Rain". Environment Canada. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
  7. 1 2 Briney, Amanda. "Causes, History and Effects of Acid Rain". About. Archived from the original on 18 November 2012. Retrieved 5 November 2012.
  8. Cribb, Robert; Sonntag, Patti; Wrobel, Michael; Elliot, P.W. (16 October 2018). "'Off the chart' air quality readings in Saskatchewan's southeast raise new concerns – but little public warning". The Star. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
  9. 1 2 "U.S. Canada Air Quality Agreement (AQA)". U.S. Department of State. 12 April 2007. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
  10. "Ground-level Ozone Basic Information". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
  11. "Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement Progress Report 2012". Environment Canada. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  12. 1 2 Hopkin, Michael (2005). "Acid rain still hurting Canada". Nature. doi:10.1038/news050808-10.
  13. 1 2 3 "Canadian cities petition U.S. to curb air pollution". CBC. 1 November 2006. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  14. "Prentice pledges emissions cuts 2.5% above 1990 levels". The Council of Canadians. 1 February 2010. Archived from the original on 3 February 2010. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  15. "Water pollution: causes and effects". Government of Canada. Environment and Climate Change. 30 November 2010. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  16. Jeziorski, Adam; Yan, Norman D.; Paterson, Andrew M.; Desellas, Anna M.; Turner, Michael A.; Jeffries, Dean S.; Keller, Bill; Weeber, Russ C.; McNicol, Don K.; Palmer, Michelle E.; McIver, Kyle; Arseneau, Kristina; Ginn, Brian K.; Cumming, Brian F.; Smol, John P. (28 November 2008). "The Widespread Threat of Calcium Decline in Fresh Waters". Science. 322 (5906): 1374–1377. doi:10.1126/science.1164949. PMID   19039134. S2CID   24907037 . Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  17. 1 2 3 "Canada tar sands industry ignoring toxic river pollution". The Ecologist. Retrieved 21 October 2012.
  18. Prebble, Peter. "Elevated Levels of Toxins Found Downstream of Oil Sands Operations". Saskatchewan Environmental Society. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  19. Hume, Mark (23 August 2012). "Fearing water pollution, NWT towns call for oil sands slowdown". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  20. "Ontario's Natural Resources-Water and".{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  21. "Canada Pollutes More Than Its Share". Enviromation. 37: 258–259. 2006.
  22. "NEW REPORT SHOWS GREAT LAKES BASIN GENERATES MORE THAN 1 BILLION KILOGRAMS OF AIR POLLUTION". Enviromation. 33: 241–242. June 2005.
  23. 1 2 Mittelstaedt, M (2008). "Oil Sands Will Pollute Great Lakes, Report Warns". Rachel's Democracy and Health News (980): 1.
  24. 1 2 3 "United States and Canada Sign Amended Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement". Environment Canada. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  25. Bruce, James P; Chris Wood (16 September 2012). "Canada-U.S. Great Lakes water quality: One step forward, two steps back". The Star. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  26. 1 2 Canada, Environment; Canada, Fisheries and Oceans; Canada, Indian and Northern Affairs (2008). "Land-Based Pollution in the Arctic Ocean: Canadian Actions in a Regional and Global Context". Arctic. 61 (5): 111–121. doi:10.14430/arctic106. hdl: 10535/5556 .
  27. 1 2 "Arctic Ocean Pollution Doubled in 10 Years". UPI. 23 October 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
  28. "What is the Purpose of Drinking Water Quality Guidelines/Regulations?" (PDF). Safe Drinking Water Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 October 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  29. Nakate, Shashank. "Sewage Water Pollution" . Retrieved 24 October 2012.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 MacQueen, Ken (30 April 2009). "Many cities still dump raw sewage". Maclean's. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
  31. "Harper Government Moves to Protect Canada's Water Quality". Environment Canada. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
  32. 1 2 Rennie, Steve (13 June 2010). "Millions of litres of pollutants dumped in cities: analysis". The Star. Retrieved 27 October 2012.
  33. 1 2 Owen, Bruce; Bartley Kives (25 October 2012). "City charged for putting partially treated sewage into Red River in 2011". Winnipeg Free Press. Retrieved 27 October 2012.
  34. Gresham, Tom. "Brief Introduction to Water and Soil Pollution". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 22 June 2012. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
  35. "Forest soils recovering from effects of acid rain | Soil Science Society of America".
  36. "Protecting Canada's Boreal Forests and Northern Ecosystems:Developing Biological Methods to Assess and Preserve Canada's Soil Environments of the North". Environment Canada. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
  37. 1 2 Weber, Bob (7 December 2009). "Oilsands pollution exceeds official estimates:study". The Star. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
  38. "Alberta Demands Imperial Oil Replace Soil". Daily Commercial News and Construction Record. 75 (147): 4. 2002.
  39. 1 2 3 Swan, David. "Does Road Salt Pollute The Soil". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 3 March 2013. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
  40. 1 2 3 "When the Ice Clears, Where Does All the Road Salt Go?". The Times [London]. 13 February 2009.
  41. Quinn, Pat. "Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)". Illinois Department of Public Health. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  42. "Weeds Remediate Contaminated Soil". 30 June 2010. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  43. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Government of Canada (2014). "Oceans Act: Governance for sustainable marine ecosystems". Government of Canada. Government of Canada.
  44. Government of Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada (12 May 2021). "Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 155, Number 10: Order Adding a Toxic Substance to Schedule 1 to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999". gazette.gc.ca. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
  45. "Government of Canada moving forward with banning harmful single-use plastics". canada.ca. 21 December 2021.
  46. 1 2 "Health Effects of Air Pollution". Health Canada. Archived from the original on 27 December 2012. Retrieved 14 November 2012.
  47. "Impacts of Air Pollution". Environment Canada. Retrieved 14 November 2012.
  48. Hughes, Martin. "Diseases Caused by Air Pollution". Livestrong. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  49. "Air Pollution and Heart Disease, Stroke". American Heart Association. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  50. "Air pollution kills thousands each year: Health Canada". CBC News. 2 May 2005. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  51. "No Breathing Room: National Illness Costs of Air Pollution" (PDF). Canadian Medical Association. August 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  52. Bichu, Divya (10 April 2011). "Diseases Caused by Soil Pollution".