Isbell duality

Last updated

Isbell conjugacy (a.k.a. Isbell duality or Isbell adjunction) (named after John R. Isbell [1] [2] ) is a fundamental construction of enriched category theory formally introduced by William Lawvere in 1986. [3] [4] That is a duality between covariant and contravariant representable presheaves associated with an objects of categories under the Yoneda embedding. [5] [6] Also, Lawvere (1986 , p. 169) says that; "Then the conjugacies are the first step toward expressing the duality between space and quantity fundamental to mathematics". [7]

Contents

Definition

Yoneda embedding

The (covariant) Yoneda embedding is a covariant functor from a small category into the category of presheaves on , taking to the contravariant representable functor: [1] [8] [9]

and the co-Yoneda embedding [1] [10] [8] [11] (a.k.a. contravariant Yoneda embedding [12] [note 1] or the dual Yoneda embedding [17] ) is a contravariant functor (a covariant functor from the opposite category) from a small category into the category of co-presheaves on , taking to the covariant representable functor:

Every functor has an Isbell conjugate [1] , given by

In contrast, every functor has an Isbell conjugate [1] given by

Isbell duality

Origin of symbols
O
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}}
and
S
p
e
c
{\displaystyle \mathrm {Spec} }
: Lawvere (1986, p. 169) says that; "
O
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}}
" assigns to each general space the algebra of functions on it, whereas "
S
p
e
c
{\displaystyle \mathrm {Spec} }
" assigns to each algebra its "spectrum" which is a general space. Isbell duality.svg
Origin of symbols and : Lawvere (1986 , p. 169) says that; "" assigns to each general space the algebra of functions on it, whereas "" assigns to each algebra its “spectrum” which is a general space.
note:In order for this commutative diagram to hold, it is required that E is co-complete. Nerve and realization (ver. left kan extension).svg
note:In order for this commutative diagram to hold, it is required that E is co-complete.

Isbell duality is the relationship between Yoneda embedding and co-Yoneda embedding;

Let be a symmetric monoidal closed category, and let be a small category enriched in .

The Isbell duality is an adjunction between the categories; . [3] [1] [22] [23] [10] [24]

The functors of Isbell duality are such that and . [22] [25] [note 2]

See also

Related Research Articles

In mathematics, specifically category theory, a functor is a mapping between categories. Functors were first considered in algebraic topology, where algebraic objects are associated to topological spaces, and maps between these algebraic objects are associated to continuous maps between spaces. Nowadays, functors are used throughout modern mathematics to relate various categories. Thus, functors are important in all areas within mathematics to which category theory is applied.

In mathematics, the Yoneda lemma is a fundamental result in category theory. It is an abstract result on functors of the type morphisms into a fixed object. It is a vast generalisation of Cayley's theorem from group theory. It allows the embedding of any locally small category into a category of functors defined on that category. It also clarifies how the embedded category, of representable functors and their natural transformations, relates to the other objects in the larger functor category. It is an important tool that underlies several modern developments in algebraic geometry and representation theory. It is named after Nobuo Yoneda.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors of some fixed category. An endofunctor is a functor mapping a category to itself, and a monad is an endofunctor together with two natural transformations required to fulfill certain coherence conditions. Monads are used in the theory of pairs of adjoint functors, and they generalize closure operators on partially ordered sets to arbitrary categories. Monads are also useful in the theory of datatypes, the denotational semantics of imperative programming languages, and in functional programming languages, allowing languages without mutable state to do things such as simulate for-loops; see Monad.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a functor category is a category where the objects are the functors and the morphisms are natural transformations between the functors. Functor categories are of interest for two main reasons:

Mitchell's embedding theorem, also known as the Freyd–Mitchell theorem or the full embedding theorem, is a result about abelian categories; it essentially states that these categories, while rather abstractly defined, are in fact concrete categories of modules. This allows one to use element-wise diagram chasing proofs in these categories. The theorem is named after Barry Mitchell and Peter Freyd.

In mathematics, an algebraic stack is a vast generalization of algebraic spaces, or schemes, which are foundational for studying moduli theory. Many moduli spaces are constructed using techniques specific to algebraic stacks, such as Artin's representability theorem, which is used to construct the moduli space of pointed algebraic curves and the moduli stack of elliptic curves. Originally, they were introduced by Alexander Grothendieck to keep track of automorphisms on moduli spaces, a technique which allows for treating these moduli spaces as if their underlying schemes or algebraic spaces are smooth. After Grothendieck developed the general theory of descent, and Giraud the general theory of stacks, the notion of algebraic stacks was defined by Michael Artin.

In mathematics, particularly category theory, a representable functor is a certain functor from an arbitrary category into the category of sets. Such functors give representations of an abstract category in terms of known structures allowing one to utilize, as much as possible, knowledge about the category of sets in other settings.

In mathematics, coherent duality is any of a number of generalisations of Serre duality, applying to coherent sheaves, in algebraic geometry and complex manifold theory, as well as some aspects of commutative algebra that are part of the 'local' theory.

This is a glossary of properties and concepts in category theory in mathematics.

In mathematics, specifically in category theory, hom-sets give rise to important functors to the category of sets. These functors are called hom-functors and have numerous applications in category theory and other branches of mathematics.

In category theory, an end of a functor is a universal dinatural transformation from an object e of X to S.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, for every object in every category where the product exists, there exists the diagonal morphism

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a presheaf on a category is a functor . If is the poset of open sets in a topological space, interpreted as a category, then one recovers the usual notion of presheaf on a topological space.

In algebraic geometry, a Fourier–Mukai transformΦK is a functor between derived categories of coherent sheaves D(X) → D(Y) for schemes X and Y, which is, in a sense, an integral transform along a kernel object K ∈ D(X×Y). Most natural functors, including basic ones like pushforwards and pullbacks, are of this type.

In algebraic geometry and algebraic topology, branches of mathematics, A1homotopy theory or motivic homotopy theory is a way to apply the techniques of algebraic topology, specifically homotopy, to algebraic varieties and, more generally, to schemes. The theory is due to Fabien Morel and Vladimir Voevodsky. The underlying idea is that it should be possible to develop a purely algebraic approach to homotopy theory by replacing the unit interval [0, 1], which is not an algebraic variety, with the affine line A1, which is. The theory has seen spectacular applications such as Voevodsky's construction of the derived category of mixed motives and the proof of the Milnor and Bloch-Kato conjectures.

In mathematics, a Grothendieck category is a certain kind of abelian category, introduced in Alexander Grothendieck's Tôhoku paper of 1957 in order to develop the machinery of homological algebra for modules and for sheaves in a unified manner. The theory of these categories was further developed in Pierre Gabriel's seminal thesis in 1962.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the formal criteria for adjoint functors are criteria for the existence of a left or right adjoint of a given functor.

In mathematics, compact objects, also referred to as finitely presented objects, or objects of finite presentation, are objects in a category satisfying a certain finiteness condition.

In mathematics, especially in category theory, the codensity monad is a fundamental construction associating a monad to a wide class of functors.

An anafunctor is a notion introduced by Makkai (1996) for ordinary categories that is a generalization of functors. In category theory, some statements require the axiom of choice, but the axiom of choice can sometimes be avoided when using an anafunctor. For example, the statement "every fully faithful and essentially surjective functor is an equivalence of categories" is equivalent to the axiom of choice, but we can usually follow the same statement without the axiom of choice by using anafunctor instead of functor.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ( Baez 2022 )
  2. ( Di Liberti 2020 , 2. Isbell duality)
  3. 1 2 ( Lawvere 1986 , p. 169)
  4. ( Rutten 1998 )
  5. ( Melliès & Zeilberger 2018 )
  6. ( Willerton 2013 )
  7. ( Space and quantity in nlab )
  8. 1 2 ( Yoneda embedding in nlab )
  9. ( Valence 2017 , Corollaire 2)
  10. 1 2 ( Isbell duality in nlab )
  11. ( Valence 2017 , Définition 67)
  12. ( Di Liberti & Loregian 2019 , Definition 5.12)
  13. (Riehl 2016, Theorem 3.4.6.)
  14. (Starr 2020, Example 4.7.)
  15. (Opposite functors in nlab)
  16. (Pratt 1996, §.4 Symmetrizing the Yoneda embedding)
  17. ( Day & Lack 2007 , §9. Isbell conjugacy)
  18. ( Di Liberti 2020 , Remark 2.3 (The (co)nerve construction).)
  19. ( Kelly 1982 , Proposition 4.33)
  20. ( Riehl 2016 , Remark 6.5.9.)
  21. ( Imamura 2022 , Theorem 2.4)
  22. 1 2 ( Di Liberti 2020 , Remark 2.4)
  23. ( Fosco 2021 )
  24. ( Valence 2017 , Définition 68)
  25. ( Di Liberti & Loregian 2019 , Lemma 5.13.)

Bibliography

Footnote

  1. Note that: the contravariant Yoneda embedding written in the article is replaced with the opposite category for both domain and codomain from that written in the textbook. [13] See opposite functor. [14] [15] In addition, this pair of Yoneda embeddings is collectively called the two Yoneda embeddings. [16]
  2. For the symbol Lan, see left Kan extension.