Karl Loewenstein

Last updated • 9 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Karl Loewenstein (November 9, 1891 in Munich – July 10, 1973 in Heidelberg) was a German lawyer and political scientist, regarded as one of the prominent figures of Constitutional law in the twentieth century.

Contents

His research and investigations into the typology of the different constitutions have had some impact on the Western constitutional thought. Loewenstein is credited with establishing the theoretical foundations of militant democracy to battle anti-democratic mass movements.

He worked as lecturer in his native city of Munich when Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party took power in 1933. Loewenstein went to the United States, becoming chair of political science at Amherst College and published extensively. He received American citizenship and after World War II worked for the Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (AMG) in West Germany.

Life and career

Karl Loewenstein was born in 1891 into a Jewish family that had assimilated in Munich's German-Jewish bourgeoisie. The young Loewenstein studied at universities in Munich, Heidelberg, Paris, and Berlin. He settled in Munich and in 1918 was called to the bar in Bavaria. Loewenstein received his doctorate in law from the University of Munich in 1919. In the 1920s, Loewenstein continued his studies and built up a law practice in international commercial law. In 1931 Loewenstein completed his postgraduate studied on comparative government and began working as a part-time lecturer in law at Munich University. [1]

Exile in the United States

After the Nazi Party seized power in 1933 Loewenstein immigrated to the United States and worked for two years at Yale University as a lecturer in politics. In 1936 Loewenstein became chair of political science and jurisprudence at Amherst College. Soon after, the work-obsessed Loewenstein received American citizenship, was called to the bar in Massachusetts and began publishing extensively on European and South American fascist movements. Loewenstein remained emotionally connected to his German homeland and the Nazi rise to power filled him with great sorrow. [2] He published an academic review of how the Nazis parasitized the German Civil Code in the three years since taking power, explaining bitterly that "National Socialism is anti-liberal and anti-individualistic, by implication it is irrational, mystical, and romantic; by its result it is totalitarian to the point of religious obsession." [3]

In 1937 Loewenstein published two articles in The American Political Science Review which analyzed the failure of the Weimar Republic and the collapse of democracies on the European continent after World War I. Loewenstein argued that the failed European democracies lacked effective instruments to defend against modern anti-democratic movements. Loewenstein coined the term militant democracy (streitbare Demokratie) when he described a battle-ready democracy that was equipped with robust constitutional mechanisms to withstand an autocrat who by popular vote acquired office within a democratic institution. [4] Loewenstein summarized his academic analysis of Fascist power grabs on the European continent in the 1930s and concluded that the enemies of democracy would exploit the freedoms guaranteed in a democracy to disable the democratic order from within while at the same time insisting on their own individual rights guaranteed by the rule of law. Therefore, Loewenstein reasoned that a self-preserving democratic state should be prepared to use emergency powers and temporarily suspend a fundamental human right, if the institutional rule of law is obstructed or sabotaged. [5] Loewenstein maintained that fascism had no intellectual kernel and instead relied on "emotionalism" that cannot be battled by normal democratic means. He contended that "fire should be fought with fire" and that in the face of adversity, a more "disciplined" democracy was needed. [6]

In 1939 the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation awarded Loewenstein a fellowship and he was able to travel to Latin America for research. [7] In the wake of the 1941 Atlantic Charter, which set out American and British goals for the world after the end of World War II, the American Law Institute (ALI) invited Loewenstein and Ernst Rabel to join a committee of international experts as representatives of pre-Nazi German legal culture. The committee issued advice for the drafting of a Statement of Essential Human Rights. Loewenstein argued that human rights can only be realized in a democracy and formulated a right to participation in government which was adopted as Article 16 of the ALI draft: "[e]very one has the right to take part in the government of his state", which corresponded to a duty of the state "to conform to the will of the people as manifested by democratic elections". [8] Between 1942 and 1944 Loewenstein worked for the US Justice Department. In 1943 and 1944 Loewenstein also completed work for the Foreign Economic Administration (FEA). [9]

Denazification

When World War II ended in 1945 Loewenstein jumped at the opportunity to work as a consultant for the Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (AMG). [10] Loewenstein arrived in occupied Berlin in July 1945 and alongside twenty other lawyers worked for the Legal Division, a US military organ tasked with reforming Germany's legal structure. [11] The prominent German jurist Carl Schmitt was immediately targeted by the AMG because the American military governor of occupied Germany Lucius D. Clay ordered that the intellectual masterminds of Nazi Germany should also be bought before the Nuremberg Tribunal. [12] Loewenstein was tasked with investigating Schmitt and had him arrested without charges in September 1945. Loewenstein impounded Schmitt's book collection for the use by the AMG. In November Loewenstein completed the arrest report which attested Schmitt a substantial influence in Nazi Germany and a worldwide reputation as chief ideologist for totalitarian and fascist movements with particular influence in France, Spain, and Latin America. [13] An investigating committee cleared Schmitt and he was released in October 1946, only to be summoned to the Nuernberg trials by Ossip K. Flechtheim. When interrogated by Robert Kempner before being released again, [14] Schmitt niggled: "There is nothing being brought against me other than what I have written". [15]

Loewenstein traveled Allied-occupied Germany for 15 months and helped to identify judges, lawyers and law professors that should be banned from contributing to Germany's jurisprudence. As one of only three German lawyers working for the Legal Division, Loewenstein acted as intelligence officer and conducted interviews with members of the German legal profession. Loewenstein was called the "pope of denazification" by his colleagues for his efforts to reform the German Bar Association. Loewenstein succeeded in making the German Bar independent of political oversight. [16]

Munich University professorship

In 1946 Loewenstein refused the offer of a professorship in legal history at Erlangen University. [17] Instead Loewenstein between 1949 and 1952 campaigned for the established of a political science faculty in Germany. Starting in 1949 Loewenstein held several lectures on the nature of political science. Loewenstein was joined by the exiles Franz Neumann, Ferdinand Hermens and Alexander Rüstow in the attempt to establish political science an independent faculty that developed methodologies of research with autonomy from university subjects such as philosophy, history and jurisprudence. Loewenstein regarded the US political science faculty as the benchmark for academic discipline [18] and lamented that the German academic tradition suffered because it regarded political power as a Gothic force with the demonic characteristics of love and faith. Loewenstein, himself professor of political science in the US, forcefully dissented. "Politics is nothing else but the struggle for power". He regarded political science as autonomous university subject because "more and more, power is being considered the dynamic infrastructure of sociopolitical institutions". [19]

Political science was established as separate university subject in West Germany and 16 exiles were appointed as full-time political science professors during the 1950s and 1960s. Ernst Fraenkel, Ossip K. Flechtheim, and Richard Löwenthal received professorships in the social democratic West Berlin. While the universities in the liberal-conservative mainland West Germany awarded professorships to Arnold Bergstraesser, Heinrich Brüning, Ferdinand A. Hermens, Fritz Morstein Marx, and Eric Voegelin. [20] Loewenstein pursued his own academic ambition and after political maneuvering he was appointed professor of political science at Munich University. The university's faculty of law, whose members were predominantly former Nazis, considered Loewenstein's appointment particularly controversial. When the Nazi Party seized power in 1933 Loewenstein had worked as a law lecturer at Munich University. He felt compelled to go into exile when his university office was stormed by Nazis. Loewenstein was 65 years old when he was appointed and was formally put on leave from teaching at Munich University so he could continue to retain his primary residence and professorship in the US. [21]

Constitutional theory

In 1957 Loewenstein published his book on Political Power and the Governmental Process (retitled Verfassungslehre in a later translation into German), which was reprinted several times. [22] Loewenstein categorized constitutions according to their impact on the rule of law. He distinguished between three types of constitutions. A normative constitution is fully effective, the political system is compliant with the provisions of the constitution and politicians are bound by law. A nominal constitution is not fully effective as practical implementation of constitutional provisions is hindered by political and economic power structures or because laws are generally not faithfully applied. Loewenstein categorized constitutions that reflect a political vision but had no impact on the rule of law as semantic. [23] He maintained that countries in the Western bloc typically had normative constitutions. He theorized that states with colonial or feudal social structure are most likely to have a nominal constitution. [24] He wrote a book on Max Weber's political ideas and examined their relevance to the then-present of 1966. [25]

Works

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weimar Republic</span> German state from 1918 to 1933

The Weimar Republic, officially known as the German Reich, was a historical period of Germany from 9 November 1918 to 23 March 1933, during which it was a constitutional republic for the first time in history; hence it is also referred to, and unofficially proclaimed itself, as the German Republic. The period's informal name is derived from the city of Weimar, which hosted the constituent assembly that established its government. In English, the republic was usually simply called "Germany", with "Weimar Republic" not commonly used until the 1930s. The Weimar Republic had a semi-presidential system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany</span> Constitution for the Federal Republic of Germany

The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany is the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carl Schmitt</span> German jurist and political theorist (1888–1985)

Carl Schmitt was a German jurist, political theorist, and prominent member of the Nazi Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">President of Germany (1919–1945)</span> Head of state under the Weimar Constitution

The president of Germany was the head of state under the Weimar Constitution, which was officially in force from 1919 to 1945, encompassing the periods of the Weimar Republic and Nazi Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Kelsen</span> Austrian jurist and legal philosopher (1881–1973)

Hans Kelsen was an Austrian jurist, legal philosopher and political philosopher. He was the principal architect of the 1920 Austrian Constitution, which with amendments is still in operation. Due to the rise of totalitarianism in Austria, Kelsen left for Germany in 1930 but was forced out of his university post after the Nazi seizure of power in 1933 because of his Jewish ancestry. That year he left for Geneva and in 1940 he moved to the United States. In 1934, Roscoe Pound lauded Kelsen as "undoubtedly the leading jurist of the time". While in Vienna, Kelsen met Sigmund Freud and his circle, and wrote on social psychology and sociology.

Karl Dietrich Bracher was a German political scientist and historian of the Weimar Republic and Nazi Germany, born in Stuttgart. During World War II, he served in the Wehrmacht and was captured by the Americans while serving in Tunisia in 1943. Bracher was awarded a Ph.D. in the classics by the University of Tübingen in 1948 and subsequently studied at Harvard University from 1949 to 1950.Bracher taught at the Free University of Berlin from 1950 to 1958 and at the University of Bonn since 1959.

<i>Rechtsstaat</i> Continental European legal doctrine

Rechtsstaat is a doctrine in continental European legal thinking, originating in German jurisprudence. It can be translated into English as "rule of law", alternatively "legal state", state of law, "state of justice", or "state based on justice and integrity". It means that everyone is subjected to the law, especially governments.

In American law, the unitary executive theory is a Constitutional law theory according to which the President of the United States has sole authority over the executive branch. It is "an expansive interpretation of presidential power that aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House". The theory often comes up in jurisprudential disagreements about the president's ability to remove employees within the executive branch; transparency and access to information; discretion over the implementation of new laws; and the ability to influence agencies' rule-making. There is disagreement about the doctrine's strength and scope, with more expansive versions of the theory becoming the focus of modern political debate. These expansive versions are controversial for both constitutional and practical reasons. Since the Reagan administration, the Supreme Court has embraced a stronger unitary executive, which has been championed primarily by its conservative justices, the Federalist Society, and the Heritage Foundation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jack Balkin</span> American legal scholar

Jack M. Balkin is an American legal scholar. He is the Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School. Balkin is the founder and director of the Yale Information Society Project (ISP), a research center whose mission is "to study the implications of the Internet, telecommunications, and the new information technologies for law and society." He also directs the Knight Law and Media Program and the Abrams Institute for Free Expression at Yale Law School.

Carl Joachim Friedrich was a German-American professor and political theorist. He taught alternately at Harvard and Heidelberg until his retirement in 1971. His writings on state and constitutional theory, constitutionalism and government made him one of the world's leading political scientists in the post-World War II period. He is one of the most influential scholars of totalitarianism.

Defensive democracy is a term referring to the collection of laws, delegated legislation, and court rulings which limit certain rights and freedoms in a democratic society in order to protect the existence of the state, its democratic character and institutions, minority rights, or other aspects of the democratic system. The term is related to a conflict that may emerge in a democratic country between compliance with democratic values, particularly freedom of association and the right to be elected, and the goal of preventing anti-democratic groups and persons from abusing these principles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional patriotism</span> Concept of citizenship

Constitutional patriotism is the idea that people should form a political attachment to the norms and values of a pluralistic liberal democratic constitution rather than to a national culture or cosmopolitan society. It is associated with post-nationalist identity because, while it is seen as a similar concept to nationalism, the attachment is based on the constitution rather than on a national culture. In essence, it is an attempt to re-conceptualize group identity with a focus on the interpretation of citizenship as a loyalty that goes beyond individuals' ethnocultural identification. Theorists believe this to be more defensible than other forms of shared commitment in a diverse modern state with multiple languages and group identities. It is particularly relevant in post-national democratic states in which multiple cultural and ethnic groups coexist. It was influential in the development of the European Union and a key to Europeanism as a basis for multiple countries belonging to a supranational union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adrian Vermeule</span> American legal scholar

Cornelius Adrian Comstock Vermeule is an American legal scholar who is currently the Ralph S. Tyler Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard Law School. He is an expert on constitutional and administrative law, and, since 2016, has voiced support for Catholic integralism. He has articulated this into his theory of common-good constitutionalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political philosophy of Immanuel Kant</span> Overview of Immanuel Kants political philosophy

The political philosophy of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) favoured a classical republican approach. In Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (1795), Kant listed several conditions that he thought necessary for ending wars and creating a lasting peace. They included a world of constitutional republics by establishment of political community. His classical republican theory was extended in Doctrine of Right (1797), the first part of Metaphysics of Morals. At the end of the 20th century Kant's political philosophy had been enjoying a remarkable renaissance in English-speaking countries with more major studies in a few years than had appeared in the preceding many decades.

A state of exception is a concept introduced in the 1920s by the German philosopher and jurist Carl Schmitt, similar to a state of emergency but based in the sovereign's ability to transcend the rule of law in the name of the public good.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde</span> German judge (1930–2019)

Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde was a German legal scholar and a justice on Germany's Federal Constitutional Court. He was a professor at the University of Freiburg and the author of more than 20 books and 80 articles dealing with legal and constitutional theory, as well as political theory, political philosophy and Catholic political thought. Böckenförde was considered a member of the Ritter School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otto Kirchheimer</span> German-American legal scholar

Otto Kirchheimer (German:[ˈkɪʁçˌhaɪmɐ]; 11 November 1905, Heilbronn – 22 November 1965, Alexandria, Virginia was a German jurist of Jewish ancestry and political scientist of the Frankfurt School whose work essentially covered the state and its constitution.

The rule according to a higher law is a statement which expresses that no law may be enforced by the government unless it conforms with certain universal principles of fairness, morality, and justice. Thus, the rule according to a higher law may serve as a practical legal criterion to qualify the instances of political or economical decision-making, when a government, even though acting in conformity with clearly defined and properly enacted law, still produces results which many observers find unfair or unjust.

Constitutionalism is "a compound of ideas, attitudes, and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law".

The liberal democratic basic order is a fundamental term in German constitutional law. It determines the unalienable, invariable core structure of the German commonwealth. As such, it is the core substance of the German constitution. Building upon more general definitions of liberal democracy, the term has a specific legal meaning in Germany and is part of the German system of a Streitbare Demokratie that bans attempts to dismantle the liberal democratic basic order by what German authorities refer to as "enemies of the Constitution" or "extremists".

References

  1. R. W. Kostal (2019). Laying Down the Law: The American Legal Revolutions in Occupied Germany and Japan. Harvard University Press. pp. 67–77. ISBN   9780674243828.
  2. R. W. Kostal (2019). Laying Down the Law: The American Legal Revolutions in Occupied Germany and Japan. Harvard University Press. p. 77. ISBN   9780674243828.
  3. Markus Thiel (2016). The 'Militant Democracy' Principle in Modern Democracies. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   9781317024033.
  4. Daniela Hacke, ed. (2004). Militant Democracy. Eleven International Publishing. p. 1. ISBN   9077596046.
  5. Oren Gross; Fionnuala Ní Aoláin (2006). Law in Times of Crisis. Cambridge University Press. p. 38. ISBN   9781139457750.
  6. Jan-Werner Muller (2011). Contesting Democracy. Yale University Press. ISBN   9780300180909.
  7. David S. Clark (2022). American Comparative Law: A History. Oxford University Press. p. 356. ISBN   9780195369922.
  8. Rensmann, Thilo (November 2011). "Munich Alumni and the Evolution of International Human Rights Law". European Journal of International Law. 22 (4): 973–991. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chr073 . Retrieved 30 October 2022.
  9. David S. Clark (2022). American Comparative Law: A History. Oxford University Press. p. 356. ISBN   9780195369922.
  10. David S. Clark (2022). American Comparative Law: A History. Oxford University Press. p. 356. ISBN   9780195369922.
  11. Udi Greenberg (2016). The Weimar Century: German Émigrés and the Ideological Foundations of the Cold War. Princeton University Press. p. 199. ISBN   9780691173825.
  12. William E. Scheuerman (1999). Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 176. ISBN   9780847694181.
  13. Oona A. Hathaway; Scott J. Shapiro (2017). The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. Simon & Schuster. pp. 292–293. ISBN   9781501109867.
  14. Werner Sollors (2014). The Temptation of Despair: Tales of the 1940s. Harvard University Press. p. 173. ISBN   9780674416321.
  15. Werner Sollors (2014). The Temptation of Despair: Tales of the 1940s. Harvard University Press. p. 174. ISBN   9780674416321.
  16. Udi Greenberg (2016). The Weimar Century: German Émigrés and the Ideological Foundations of the Cold War. Princeton University Press. p. 199. ISBN   9780691173825.
  17. Werner Sollors (2014). The Temptation of Despair: Tales of the 1940s. Harvard University Press. p. 156. ISBN   9780674416321.
  18. Ludger Pries; Pablo Yankelevich (2018). Scientists as Refugees, Émigrés and Return-Migrants. Springer International Publishing. p. 117. ISBN   9783319992655.
  19. George E. Gordon Catlin (2021). Systematic Politics. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   9781000349283.
  20. Ludger Pries; Pablo Yankelevich (2018). Scientists as Refugees, Émigrés and Return-Migrants. Springer International Publishing. p. 118. ISBN   9783319992655.
  21. Werner Sollors (2014). The Temptation of Despair: Tales of the 1940s. Harvard University Press. p. 156. ISBN   9780674416321.
  22. Werner Sollors (2014). The Temptation of Despair: Tales of the 1940s. Harvard University Press. p. 153. ISBN   9780674416321.
  23. András Sajó; Michel Rosenfeld (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. OUP Oxford. p. 107. ISBN   9780199578610.
  24. Andrea Bonime-Blanc (2019). Spain's Transition To Democracy. Taylor & Francis. p. 107. ISBN   9781000312850.
  25. Secher, H. P. (June 1967). "Max Weber's Political Ideas in the Perspective of Our Time. By Karl Loewenstein. (Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1966. Pp. xii, 104. $2.00.)". American Political Science Review. 61 (2): 505–506. doi:10.1017/S0003055400135713. ISSN   0003-0554. S2CID   197681944.