Kate Brown (professor)

Last updated

Kate Brown (born September 24, 1965) is a Professor of Science, Technology and Society at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She is the author of Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide to the Future (2019), Dispatches from Dystopia (2015), Plutopia (2013), and A Biography of No Place (2004). She was a member of the faculty at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) from 2000 to 2018. She is the founding consulting editor of History Unclassified in the American Historical Review .

Contents

Brown's work is distinguished by its combination of archival research, oral history, sensory observation, reflective autobiography, and innovative literary form in the writing of history. Her Manual for Survival (2019), a ground-level study of the impact of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award in nonfiction and was described by The Economist as “a magisterial blend of historical research, investigative journalism, and poetic reportage.” [1] She is the only historian ever to receive the United States’ highest scholarly prizes in Russian studies, U.S. history, Western history, environmental history, and the history of the Americas—all for the same work, Plutopia, a comparative study of nuclear production and social transformation in the Cold War United States and the Soviet Union. Brown is currently working on a global history and future of urban farming.

Brown has been the recipient of many of the signature honors in the arts and humanities. These include a Guggenheim Fellowship, a Carnegie Fellowship, and a Berlin Prize Fellowship. Her A Biography of No Place (2004), a study of community and identity in eastern Europe's forgotten borderlands, received the George Louis Beer Prize of the American Historical Association (AHA), given for outstanding writing in European international history. Plutopia received three of the highest awards in American history: the AHA's Albert J. Beveridge and John H. Dunning awards and the Ellis W. Hawley Prize of the Organization of American Historians (OAH). The American Society of Environmental History awarded Plutopia the George Perkins Marsh Prize. In addition to these awards, Plutopia was honored with the principal award in Russian/Eurasian studies, as winner of the Wayne S. Vucinich Prize of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES) for the most important work in that field in any discipline. Manual for Survival also received multiple scholarly awards, including the Reginald Zelnik Prize in Russian/Eurasian history and the Marshal D. Shulman Prize in foreign policy, both given by ASEEES. Brown's research has been supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, the European University Institute, the American Council of Learned Societies, and other leading academic institutions.

Biography of No Place: From Ethnic Borderland to Soviet Heartland

This is a biography of a borderland between Russia and Poland, a region where, in 1925, people identified as Poles, Germans, Jews, Ukrainians, and Russians lived side by side. Over the next three decades, this mosaic of cultures was modernized and homogenized out of existence by the ruling might of the Soviet Union, then Nazi Germany, and finally, Polish and Ukrainian nationalism. By the 1950s, this “no place” emerged as a Ukrainian heartland, and the fertile mix of peoples that defined the region was destroyed.

Dispatches from Dystopia: A History of Places Not Yet Forgotten.

This collection of essays narrates the histories of locales that have been silenced, broken, or contaminated. In telling these previously unknown stories, Brown examines the making and unmaking of place, and the lives of the people who remain in the fragile landscapes that are left behind. The Atlantic elected Dispatches as one of the Best Books We Read in 2016.

Plutopia

The Hanford site represents two-thirds of the nation's high-level radioactive waste by volume. Nuclear reactors line the riverbank at the Hanford Site along the Columbia River in January 1960. Hanford N Reactor adjusted.jpg
The Hanford site represents two-thirds of the nation's high-level radioactive waste by volume. Nuclear reactors line the riverbank at the Hanford Site along the Columbia River in January 1960.

Richland, Washington, was the first city established to support plutonium production at the nearby Hanford nuclear site, to power the American nuclear weapons arsenals. Ozersk, Russia, supported plutonium production to power the Soviet nuclear arsenals at the Mayak nuclear plant. These were the first two cities in the world to produce plutonium for use in Cold War atomic bombs. [2]

In the 2013 book on a history of these two cities, Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters (Oxford), Kate Brown explores the health of affected citizens in both the United States and Russia, and the "slow-motion disasters" that still threaten the environments where the plants are located. According to Brown, the plants at Hanford and Mayak, over a period of four decades, "both released more than 200 million curies of radioactive isotopes into the surrounding environment -- twice the amount expelled in the Chernobyl disaster in each instance." [2]

Brown says that most of this radioactive contamination over the years at Hanford and Mayak were part of normal operations, but unforeseen accidents did occur and plant management kept this secret, as the pollution continued unabated. Even today, as pollution threats to health and the environment persist, the government keeps knowledge about the associated risks from the public. [2]

Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide to the Future

Reviews

Noah Sneider of The Economist praises the book as "a magisterial blend of historical research, investigative journalism and poetic reportage, Kate Brown sets out to uncover Chernobyl's true medical and environmental effects." [1]

Philip Ball in the New Statesman speaks about the depth about her research: "She has obtained documents and records that seemingly no one else had ever read, including some that were plainly meant to stay as buried as the contaminated Chernobyl waste. The result is an extraordinary and important – if controversial – book." [3]

Vitali Vitaliev of The Institution of Engineering and Technology calls the book "a magnificent monograph that stands out among the multiple books on Chernobyl simply because it tells us the truth – the whole unadulterated truth – about one of the worst disasters in history." and comments on the effort to downplay the effects: "Let's face it: the minimisation and even trimming-up of history's worst nuclear catastrophe has become a popular sport with some Western intellectuals, among whom I can count some deluded colleagues and friends. They keep repeating like a mantra the ‘magic’ number 62, the official death toll immediately after the 1986 explosion. By doing so, not only do they ignore the plight of tens of thousands of victims of the disaster, many of them children, who have since died of different forms of radiation sickness and cancer, they overlook the treacherous nature of the nuclear contamination and residual radiation capable of manifesting themselves years and even centuries after the tragic event. As Brown, a distinguished American scholar, herself remarks in the final part of her book: “Ignorance about low-dose exposure is, I have argued, partly deliberate.” and goes on to note: "Why were – and are – they doing it? The publishers of ‘Manual for Survival’ rightly suggest in the jacket blurb that the motivation for “(Western) scientists and diplomats from international organisations ... to bury and discredit the evidence” is that they were “worried that this evidence would blow the lid on the effects of massive radiation, released from weapons testing during the Cold War.” [4]

Serhii Plokhy considers Browns research impressive and due to her 25 years of research in Ukraine, "Brown knows her landscape exceptionally well." [5]

Writing in the Journal of Radiological Protection , Jim T. Smith criticized many aspects of Brown's Manual for Survival. He describes Brown's book as "deeply flawed and clearly biased history of the health and environmental impacts of Chernobyl". He criticized Brown for cherry picking, writing, "One of the major failings of this book is that the vast body of knowledge in the international scientific literature is almost completely ignored - except where it coincides with Brown's thesis." [6] Jim T. Smith discloses in the conflict of interest section of his review, that he has previously receives funds from the nuclear energy industry.

Dr. Geraldine Thomas, professor of pathology at Imperial College and founder of the Chernobyl Tissue Bank, also criticizes Brown's work. She states one flaw in Brown's logic: “It is just not true that the scientists try to minimize the effects of radiation. It would actually be against their own best interests to do so. They are mostly academics and are required to produce large amounts of money and papers for their institutes. You would be expecting them to argue for larger effects of radiation as the more serious the health consequences the more the money flows.” [7]

Brown published a response to Smith's critique in the Journal of Radiological Protection [JRP]. In it, she notes that recent research is moving away from Smith's conclusions that nature in the Chernobyl Zone is thriving. A recent article in the JRP about the Kyshtym reserve in Siberia (the result of an explosion in an underground waste storage tank that released 20 million curies) ruled that 70 years later the affected forests have failed to recover to their pre-accident state; that the numbers of soil animals were 15%–77% of those observed in similar but uncontaminated sites. [8] Smith fails to include in his review the work of researchers who show depressed populations in the Chernobyl Zone at all but the lowest doses, [8] and similar findings from Fukushima that concur with Chernobyl data. [8] Smith set up a non-profit to produce and sell “Atomic Vodka” from the Chernobyl Zone. [9]

Jim Smith rebukes five of Brown's claims in his reply. [10] For one, he points out that she has dismissed evidence he presented to her and characterized him as a desk-bound physicist in her book, even though he has done regular field work in the Chernobyl exclusion zone over the decades. The other four points Brown discusses goes in other claims Brown made in her response, with regards to evidence gathering and contacting other scientists.

Sophie Pinkham writes in The New York Review of Books : "Brown writes about anticipating outraged letters from nuclear scientists and plant workers, oncology clinic staff, and others whose jobs require exposure to radiation. She details her scrupulous efforts to check and double-check her data, consult with scientists from many fields, and account for factors that might skew results. I suspect that she may be accused of alarmism nonetheless." She comments that the book is about more than Chernobyl: "Brown's careful mapping of the path isotopes take is highly relevant to other industrial toxins, and to plastic waste. When we put a substance into our environment, we have to understand that it will likely remain with us for a very long time, and that it may behave in ways we never anticipated. Chernobyl should not be seen as an isolated accident or as a unique disaster, Brown argues, but as an "exclamation point" that draws our attention to the new world we are creating." [11]

Nick Slater of Current Affairs criticized flaws in Brown's research methods writing: "Although Brown's aims are certainly admirable—the arguments she uses to support them are not." [7]

Books

Awards and honors

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents</span> Severe disruptive events involving fissile or fusile materials

A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility." Examples include lethal effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to the environment, or a reactor core melt. The prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts of radioactive isotopes are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helen Caldicott</span> Australian physician, author and anti-nuclear advocate (born 1938)

Helen Mary Caldicott is an Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate. She founded several associations dedicated to opposing the use of nuclear power, depleted uranium munitions, nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons proliferation, and military action in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl exclusion zone</span> Disaster Exclusion Zone in Ukraine

The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Zone of Alienation, also called the 30-Kilometre Zone or simply The Zone, was established shortly after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukrainian SSR of the Soviet Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mayak</span> Nuclear reprocessing plant in Russia

The Mayak Production Association is one of the largest nuclear facilities in the Russian Federation, housing a reprocessing plant. The closest settlements are Ozyorsk to the northwest and Novogornyi to the south.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Gofman</span> American scientist

John William Gofman was an American scientist and advocate. He was Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl disaster</span> 1986 nuclear accident in the Soviet Union

The Chernobyl disaster began on 26 April 1986 with the explosion of the No. 4 reactor of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near the city of Pripyat in northern Ukraine, near the Belarus border in the Soviet Union. It is one of only two nuclear energy accidents rated at the maximum severity on the International Nuclear Event Scale, the other being the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. The response involved more than 500,000 personnel and cost an estimated 18 billion rubles. It remains the worst nuclear disaster in history, and the costliest disaster in human history, with an estimated cost of $700 billion USD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Oblast</span> Closed city in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia

Ozyorsk or Ozersk is a closed city in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia. It had a population of 82,164 as of the 2010 census.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plutonium in the environment</span> Plutonium present within the environment

Since the mid-20th century, plutonium in the environment has been primarily produced by human activity. The first plants to produce plutonium for use in Cold War atomic bombs were the Hanford nuclear site in Washington, and the Mayak nuclear plant, in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia. Over a period of four decades, "both released more than 200 million curies of radioactive isotopes into the surrounding environment – twice the amount expelled in the Chernobyl disaster in each instance."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies</span>

The Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES) is a scholarly society "dedicated to advancing knowledge about Central Asia, the Caucasus, Russia, and Eastern Europe in regional and global contexts." The ASEEES supports teaching, research, and publication relating to the peoples and territories within this area.

The Heldt Prize is a literary award from the Association for Women in Slavic Studies named in honor of Barbara Heldt. The award has been given variously in the following categories:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kyshtym disaster</span> 1957 radiological contamination disaster in the Soviet Union

The Kyshtym disaster, sometimes referred to as the Mayak disaster or Ozyorsk disaster in newer sources, was a radioactive contamination accident that occurred on 29 September 1957 at Mayak, a plutonium production site for nuclear weapons and nuclear fuel reprocessing plant located in the closed city of Chelyabinsk-40 in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lists of nuclear disasters and radioactive incidents</span>

These are lists of nuclear disasters and radioactive incidents.

The Laura Shannon Prize in Contemporary European Studies is a $10,000 book prize sponsored by the Nanovic Institute for European Studies at the University of Notre Dame. The Laura Shannon Prize is awarded annually to the author of the "best book in European studies that transcends a focus on any one country, state, or people to stimulate new ways of thinking about contemporary Europe as a whole." "Contemporary" is construed broadly, and books about particular countries or regions have done well in the process so long as there are implications for the remainder of Europe. The prize alternates between the humanities and history/social sciences. Nominations are typically due at the end of January each year and may be made by either authors or publishers. The final jury selects one book as the winner each year and has the discretion to award honorable mentions.

<i>Plutopia</i> Comparative history book

Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters is a 2013 book by American environmental historian Kate Brown. The book is a comparative history of the cities of Richland, in the northwest United States adjacent to the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site plutonium production area, and Ozersk, in Russia's southern Ural mountain region. These two cities were home to the world's first plutonium production sites, and in Plutopia Brown charts the environmental and social impacts of those sites on the residents of and the environment surrounding the two cities. Brown argues that the demands of plutonium production – both the danger of the physical process and the secrecy required in the Cold War context – led both US and Soviet officials to create "Plutopias," ideal communities to placate resident families in exchange for their cooperation and control over their bodies. This entailed creating significant state-run welfare programs along with high levels of consumerism in both places. However, each city witnessed what Brown terms "slow-motion disasters" via the slow, and usually controlled, release of high levels of radiation into their surrounding environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear labor issues</span> Radiation workers health and labor issues

Nuclear labor issues exist within the international nuclear power industry and the nuclear weapons production sector worldwide, impacting upon the lives and health of laborers, itinerant workers and their families.

Ian Fairlie is a U.K. based Canadian consultant on radiation in the environment and former member of the three person secretariat to Britain's Committee Examining the Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters (CERRIE). He is a radiation biologist who has focused on the radiological hazards of nuclear fuel and he has studied radioactive releases at nuclear facilities since before the Chernobyl accident in 1986.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vasily Ignatenko</span> Soviet firefighter (1961–1986)

Vasily Ivanovich Ignatenko was a Soviet firefighter who was among the first responders to the Chernobyl disaster. He worked as an electrician before being conscripted into the Soviet Armed Forces in 1980, where he completed his two years of service as a military firefighter. Afterwards, he took up employment as a paramilitary firefighter with Fire Brigade No. 6, which was based out of Pripyat. On 26 April 1986, Ignatenko's fire brigade was involved in mitigating the immediate aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster; fighting the fires that broke out following the initial explosion of Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. While on site, Ignatenko received a high dose of radiation, leading to his death at a radiological hospital in Moscow eighteen days later.

References

  1. 1 2 Sneider, Noah (May 2019). "The tragedy of Chernobyl". The Economist . Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  2. 1 2 3 Robert Lindley (2013). "Kate Brown: Nuclear "Plutopias" the Largest Welfare Program in American History". History News Network.
  3. ↑ Ball, Philip (May 2019). "Chernobyl's political fallout". New Statesman . Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  4. ↑ Vitaliev, Vitali (March 2019). "Book review: 'Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide to the Future'". The Institution of Engineering and Technology . Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  5. ↑ Plokhy, Serhii (February 2019). "Back to the future: Chernobyl revisited after three decades". Evening Standard . Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  6. ↑ Smith, Jim T. (2020). "Review of "Manual for Survival" by Kate Brown". Journal of Radiological Protection. 40 (1): 337–348. Bibcode:2020JRP....40..337S. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab17f2 – via ResearchGate.
  7. 1 2 Slater, Nick (March 27, 2019). "It's A Lovely Day To Visit Chernobyl". Current Affairs . Retrieved September 19, 2019.
  8. 1 2 3 Brown, Kate (August 2020). "Response to James Smith's review of Manual for Survival". Journal of Radiological Protection. 40 (3): 928–933. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab8f88 . PMID   32840235.
  9. ↑ Gill, Victoria. "Chernobyl vodka: First consumer product made in exclusion zone". BBC News.
  10. ↑ Smith, Jim (August 2020). "Reply to Kate Brown letter". Journal of Radiological Protection. 40 (3): 934–939. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab8f7f . PMID   32841207.
  11. ↑ Pinkham, Sophie (April 2019). "The Chernobyl Syndrome". The New York Review of Books . Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  12. ↑ It's A Lovely Day To Visit Chernobyl
  13. ↑ "George Louis Beer Prize Recipients". American Historical Association . Retrieved December 24, 2017.
  14. ↑ "Kate Brown". John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. 2018-03-20. Retrieved 2018-03-20.
  15. ↑ "Ellis W. Hawley Prize Winners" . Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  16. ↑ "Western History Association - Robert G. Athearn Award". westernhistoryassociation.wildapricot.org. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  17. ↑ "George Perkins Marsh Prize for Best Book in Environmental History" (PDF). Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  18. ↑ "Albert J. Beveridge Award Recipients | AHA". www.historians.org. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  19. ↑ "Past Winners of the ASEEES Vucinich Book Prize | ASEEES". www.aseees.org. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
  20. ↑ "John H. Dunning Prize Recipients". American Historical Association . Retrieved December 24, 2017.
  21. ↑ Baltimore, University of Maryland. "Letters to the UMB Community". University of Maryland, Baltimore. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
  22. ↑ "Kate Brown". American Academy. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  23. ↑ "Czarnobyl. Instrukcje przetrwania (Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide to the Future) - Nagroda im. Ryszarda Kapuścińskiego - Ryszard Kapuściński - Kulturalna Warszawa". www.kulturalna.warszawa.pl. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  24. ↑ "The National Book Critics Circle Award – National Book Critics Circle". www.bookcritics.org. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
  25. ↑ "Kate Brown Manual For Survival". Pushkin House. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
  26. ↑ "Marshall D. Shulman Book Prize Awarded to Kate Brown for Her Environmental History of the Chernobyl Disaster | Columbia | Harriman Institute". harriman.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
  27. ↑ "Reginald Zelnik Book Prize in History | ASEEES". www.aseees.org. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
  28. ↑ Dame, Marketing Communications: Web // University of Notre (21 October 2020). "Nanovic Institute for European Studies Announces 2021 Laura Shannon Prize Shortlist // Nanovic Institute // University of Notre Dame". Nanovic Institute. Retrieved 2020-11-18.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.