Bartels received his B.A. in political science with distinction from Yale College in 1978,his M.A. in political science,also from Yale,in 1978,and his Ph.D. in political science from the University of California,Berkeley in 1983. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1995.[1] He has published three books,Unequal Democracy:The Political Economy of The New Gilded Age (Princeton,2008),Campaign Reform:Insights and Evidence,edited with Lynn Vavreck (University of Michigan Press,2000),and Presidential Primaries and The Dynamics of Public Choice (Princeton,1988).
In his empirical analysis,Bartels finds that both college graduates and working-class people are mostly Democratic,the former having become more Democratic over the past years. He attributes the gain made by Republicans to the loss of the Solid South,with middle and high income whites from Southern states standing out as having become more Republican.[3]
Bartels studied the voting patterns of the US Senate and correlated it with the responsiveness to the opinions of different amounts of Income in the United States.
In his 2008 book,Unequal Democracy:The political economy of the new gilded age,Bartels demonstrates that income inequality expanded under Republican presidential administrations and narrowed under Democratic presidential administrations since the early 1970s,when income inequality first started to expand. Under Republican presidents,rich families saw substantial net gains in their income,while poorer families saw negligible gains,producing a significant net increase in income inequality. By contrast,under Democratic presidents,poor families did slightly better than rich families proportionally,lessening income inequality.
However,all income brackets,from the bottom 20% to the top 5% of the population,saw significantly greater increases in income under Democratic presidents than under Republican presidents. In other words,had Democratic presidents been in office since the 1970s,income inequality may have lessened since the 1950s instead of growing into what Bartels calls "The New Gilded Age" of the early 21st century. Bartels's findings led him to conclude that "economic inequality is,in substantial part,a political phenomenon."[5]
Achen,Christopher H.;Bartels,Larry M. (2016). Democracy for Realists:Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton:Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691169446.
Continuity and Crisis: Popular Reactions to the Great Recession (ed. with Nancy Bermeo, 2013)
Bartels, Larry M. (2023). Democracy Erodes from the Top: Leaders, Citizens, and the Challenge of Populism in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691244501.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
