Leonard E. Davis | |
---|---|
Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas | |
In office 2012–2015 | |
Preceded by | David Folsom |
Succeeded by | Ron Clark |
Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas | |
In office May 10,2002 –May 15,2015 | |
Appointed by | George W. Bush |
Preceded by | Paul N. Brown |
Succeeded by | J. Campbell Barker |
Personal details | |
Born | Leonard Elsworth Davis III January 15,1948 Fort Worth,Texas |
Education | University of Texas,Arlington (BA) Texas Christian University (MA) Baylor University (JD) |
Profession | Lawyer,politician,federal judge |
Leonard E. Davis (born 1948) is an American lawyer and former judge. He served as Chief Justice of the Twelfth Court of Appeals of Texas,from 2000-2002,and was nominated by George W. Bush on January 23,2002 to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas until his retirement May 15th,2015.
Born in Fort Worth,Texas,Davis received a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics from the University of Texas at Arlington in 1970,and his Master of Arts degree from Texas Christian University in 1974. Davis was also in the Texas Army National Guard from 1970 to 1973,and worked as a computer programmer and systems analyst for the Texas Electric Service Company prior to entering law school in 1974. [1] [2] [3] He graduated cum laude and first in his class from Baylor Law School with a Juris Doctor in 1976,where he was editor-in-chief of the Baylor Law Review and a member of Baylor's interscholastic moot court and mock trial teams. [4] At Baylor Law,he also received American Jurisprudence Awards for Excellence in Contracts and Federal Courts.
Davis was in private practice as a civil trial attorney in Tyler,Texas,for 23 years,from 1977 to 2000,and was Chief Justice of the Twelfth Court of Appeals of the State of Texas from 2000 to 2002. [5] [1]
On January 23,2002,Davis was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated by Paul N. Brown. Davis was confirmed by the United States Senate on May 9,2002,and received his commission on May 10,2002. He was sworn in on May 15,2002. He served as Chief Judge from 2012 to 2015. He retired from active service on May 15,2015. [6] He was primarily assigned patent lawsuits in the U.S. district court. [7]
Davis has served on the Fifth Circuit Judicial Council and the Federal Circuit Advisory Committee on Case Management. He was also Co-Chair of the Federal Judges Committee of the Federal Circuit Bar Association. [8] In August 2015,Davis was appointed by Chief Judge Sharon Prost of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to serve a three-year term on the Federal Circuit’s Advisory Council. [8] Davis received the New York Intellectual Property Law Association’s "Outstanding Public Service Award" in 2016 for his contributions to intellectual property law [8]
During his tenure on the federal bench,Davis presided over 1,700 patent cases [9] and more than 250 Markman hearings (or claim construction hearings). [8]
Among the significant patent decisions Davis ruled on during his tenure on the bench included the case of i4i v. Microsoft [10] [ circular reference ],which resulted in a $290 million willful infringement jury verdict against Microsoft,and which was further upheld on appeal by both the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. [9] [11] [1] In the case of VirnetX v. Apple,the jury rendered a $368 million verdict which was later overturned on appeal to the Federal Circuit. [9] In the Eolas v. Adobe Systems,et al case,a patentee seeking a royalty on the entire "interactive web" was defeated in a trial in which Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee testified for the defense. [9] [12]
From 2015 and on,Davis serves as of counsel at the law firm Fish &Richardson. [8] [13]
Eolas is a United States technology firm formed as a spin-off from the University of California,San Francisco (UCSF),in order to commercialize UCSF's patents for work done there by Eolas' co-founders,as part of the Visible Embryo Project. The company was founded in 1994 by Dr. Michael Doyle,Rachelle Tunik,David Martin,and Cheong Ang from the UCSF Center for Knowledge Management (CKM). The company was created at the request of UCSF,and was founded by the inventors of the university's patents.
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas is a federal court in the Fifth Circuit.
Baylor Law School is the oldest law school in Texas. Baylor Law School is affiliated with Baylor University and located in Waco,Texas. The school has been accredited by the American Bar Association since 1931 and has been a member of the Association of American Law Schools since 1938. The program offers training in all facets of law,including theoretical analysis,practical application,legal writing,advocacy,professional responsibility,and negotiation and counseling skills.
Phillip Benjamin Baldwin was a Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and previously was an Associate Judge of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
Robert Workman Sweet was an American jurist and United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
T. John Ward is a retired United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He is best known for the large number of patent infringement cases brought before his court in Marshall,Texas.
Pauline Newman is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She has been called "the heroine of the patent system","the Federal Circuit's most prolific dissenter",and "the greatest ally to inventors with respect to [calling out] the ignorance of the CAFC,district courts,and at times even the Supreme Court". Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore commented of Newman that "many of her dissents have later gone on to become the law—either the en banc law from our court or spoken on high from the Supremes".
Orlando Luis Garcia is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and former Texas state legislator.
David Alan Ezra is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Since January 2013,Ezra has been designated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court to serve on the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas,San Antonio Division to help ease the heavy workload for the federal judges in Texas.
Walter Scott Smith Jr. is a retired United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
McKool Smith is a U.S. trial firm with more than 130 trial lawyers across seven offices in Austin,Dallas,Houston,Los Angeles,Marshall,New York City,and Washington,DC. The firm represents clients in disputes involving complex commercial litigation,intellectual property (IP),bankruptcy,and white collar defense matters.
James Rodney Gilstrap is the Chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He is notable for presiding over more than one quarter of all patent infringement cases filed in the nation and is often referred to by various sources as the country's single "busiest patent judge."
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership,564 U.S. 91 (2011),was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. It deals with the presumption of validity and the standard of evidence in patent lawsuits. This case in widely considered as a prime example of a frivolous lawsuit by a patent troll,underscoring the need for a reform of the US patent law.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is an administrative law body of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) which decides issues of patentability. It was formed on September 16,2012,as one part of the America Invents Act. Prior to its formation,the main judicial body in the USPTO was the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI).
Robert William Schroeder III is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Kara Farnandez Stoll is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Roy Steven Payne is currently a U.S. magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He previously served as a U.S. magistrate judge in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana from 1987 to 2005.
Alan D Albright is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. He was formerly a United States magistrate judge of the same court. Albright oversees a significant portion of patent litigation within the United States. In 2021,the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit repeatedly rebuked him in a string of opinions for failing to transfer cases to more apt jurisdictions. A quarter of all patent lawsuits in the US were once heard by Albright,who has been widely criticized for ignoring binding case law. However,following a docket-stripping order issued by Chief Judge Orlando Garcia,Albright's patent docket has declined precipitously.
Julius Ness "Jay" Richardson is an American judge and lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He was formerly an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina.
Nautilus,Inc. v. Biosig Instruments,Inc.,134 S.Ct. 2120 (2014),was a 2014 decision by the United States Supreme Court pertaining to the interpretation of patent claims in U.S. patents. The opinion addressed the requirement contained in 35 U.S.C. §112,¶2 that a patent "particularly point[] out and distinctly claim[] the subject matter which the applicant regards as the invention." Writing for a unanimous court,Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg held that a patent fails to comply with this requirement when the patent's claims,read in light of the specification and the prosecution history,"fail to inform,with reasonable certainty,those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention." Subsequent to the Court’s decision the case was remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which,using the new standard,declined to invalidate Biosig's patent.