Moot court

Last updated

Moot court is a co-curricular activity at many law schools. Participants take part in simulated court or arbitration proceedings, usually involving drafting memorials or memoranda and participating in oral argument. In most countries, the phrase "moot court" may be shortened to simply "moot" or "mooting". Participants are either referred to as "mooters" or, less conventionally, "mooties".

Contents

Format and structure

5th European Human Rights Moot championship round, held in the European Court of Human Rights building 5th European Human Rights Moot Court Competition Final Round.jpg
5th European Human Rights Moot championship round, held in the European Court of Human Rights building

Moot court involves simulated proceedings before an appellate court, arbitral tribunal, or international dispute resolution body. These are different from mock trials that involve simulated jury trials or bench trials. Moot court does not involve actual testimony by witnesses, cross-examination, or the presentation of evidence, but is focused solely on the application of the law to a common set of evidentiary assumptions, facts, and clarifications/corrections to which the competitors are introduced. [1] Though not moots in the traditional sense, alternative dispute resolution competitions focusing on mediation and negotiation have also branded themselves as moot competitions in recent times, as had role-playing competitions in the past. This is also true for role-play contests such as the Jean-Pictet. [2]

Moot court, like law review and clinical work, is one of the key extracurricular activities in many law schools around the world. Depending on the competition, students may spend a semester researching and writing the written submissions or memorials, and another semester practicing their oral arguments, or may prepare both within the span of a few weeks. Whereas domestic moot court competitions tend to focus on municipal law such as criminal law or contract law, regional and international moot competitions tend to focus on cross-border subjects such as EU Law, public international law (including its subsets environmental law, space law, and aviation law), international human rights law, international humanitarian law, international criminal law, international trade law, international maritime law, international commercial arbitration, and foreign direct investment arbitration. Ancillary issues pertaining to jurisdiction, standing, choice of law, and remedies are also occasionally engaged, especially in arbitration and international law moots.

In most moot court competitions, there are two sides and each side is represented by two speakers or oralists (though the entire team composition may be larger, and the number of speakers may range from one to four) and a third member, sometimes known as of counsel, may be seated with the speakers. Each speaker usually speaks between 10 and 25 minutes, covering one to three main issues. After the main submissions are completed, there will usually be a short round or two of rebuttal and even surrebuttal. Communications between speakers may or may not be prohibited. Throughout the course of the submissions, judges — usually lawyers, academics, or actual judges — may ask questions, though in some competitions questions are reserved to the end of submissions.

In larger competitions, teams have to participate in up to ten rounds; the knockout/elimination stages are usually preceded by a number of preliminary rounds to determine seeding (power seeding is often used). Teams almost always must switch sides (applicant/appellant/claimant on one side, and respondent on the other) throughout a competition, and, depending on the format of the moot, the moot problem usually remains the same throughout. The scores of the written submissions are taken into consideration for most competitions to determine qualification (whether for the competition or for the knockouts) and seeding, and sometimes even up to a particular knockout stage. Participation in moot court are relevant to some law school rankings. [3] [4]

International moot court competitions

International moot competitions are generally targeted at students (including postgraduates) and only allow participants who have not qualified to practice law in any jurisdiction. However, there are a handful of international moot competitions that are targeted at newly qualified lawyers, such as the ECC-SAL Moot, which is a regional moot started in 2012 and is jointly organised by Essex Court Chambers and the Singapore Academy of Law, and the New South Wales Young Lawyers/CIArb competition.

The table below lists some of the more notable international moot competitions for students. Grand slam international moots refer to class-leading moots or those that attract a substantial number of teams, while smaller or less established and region-only competitions are known as internationals and regionals respectively. [5] [6] [7] [8] Some countries also divide competitions into various tiers of prestige for the purpose of awarding points in league tables, with moots such as the Jessup and Vis competitions being considered as belonging to the highest tier. [9] Most international moots only permit one team per institution; competitions that allow more than one team tend to be smaller in scale, and competitions that allow teams to comprise members from more than one institution are rare. Some competitions also limit the number of teams based on geographical location; for instance, for most countries, the Jessup generally only permits one qualifying institution for every ten law schools.

For the 2019/20 international moots season, many competitions such as the Jessup, Frankfurt, and International Criminal Court were cancelled due to Covid-19. Some competitions, however, such as the European Law Moot Court Competition, Price, Vis, and Vis East, hosted the oral rounds via online platforms such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams. With international travel still largely restricted late into 2020, all major competitions adopted the virtual format for 2020/21 as well, with some modifying the rules regarding qualification procedures and methods of presentation (such as standing versus sitting, sharing devices, and speaking time).

List of notable competitions

CompetitionEstablishedClass [8] [10] [11] Primary subject matterRecord annual participation (year)Location of international finalsNational or regional roundsCap on teams from same country or regionPre-mootsMultiple teams from same institutionMost (international) championships [12]
Philip C Jessup [13] 1960 (1968 for international rounds; no rounds in 2020)Grand Slam Public international law 645 teams (2017) [14]
Online: 664 teams (2022)
Washington D.C. YesYesNoNo University of Sydney (6; 1 online)
Willem C Vis [15] 1993Grand Slam International commercial arbitration 379 teams (2019)
Online: 387 teams (2021) [16]
Vienna Optional pre-mootsNoYesNo University of Ottawa (3)
Willem C Vis (East)2003Grand SlamInternational commercial arbitration133 teams (2018)
Online: 150 teams (2021) [17]
Hong Kong Optional pre-mootsNoYesNoFour-way tie (2)
Price Media Law [18] 2007Grand Slam International human rights law 121 teams (2014)
Online: 100 teams (2021)
Oxford YesNoNoNo Singapore Management University (4; 1 online)
International Criminal Court [19] 2005 (2007 for international rounds; no rounds in 2020)Grand Slam International criminal law 112 teams (2016)
Online: 95 teams (2021) [20]
The Hague YesNoNoNoSingapore Management University (4; 1 online)
Frankfurt Investment Arbitration [21] 2007 (no rounds in 2020)Grand Slam International investment arbitration 66 teams (2017) [22]
Online: 105 teams (2022)
Frankfurt YesNoYesNoThree-way tie (2)
Lachs Space Law Moot [23] 1992 (1993 for international rounds)International Space law 74 teams (2017)VariesYesYesNoNo* George Washington University (3)
* National Law School of India University (3)
John Jackson WTO 2002International World Trade Organization law99 teams (2018) [24] Geneva YesNoNoYes University of Melbourne (3)
Fletcher Insolvency [25] 2016International International insolvency law 28 teams (2020)
Online: 34 teams (2021) [26]
VariesQualification by written submissionsNoNoNoSingapore Management University (2)
Oxford Intellectual Property Law2003 (no rounds in 2020)International Intellectual property law 66 teams (2018) [27]
Online: 32 teams (2021)
OxfordQualification by written submissionsNoNoNo Queensland University of Technology (3)
Sarin Air Law [28] 2010International Aviation law 41 teams (2018)
Online: 36 teams (2021)
VariesYesNoNoNo Ram Manohar University (3)
PAX [29] 2013International Private international law 26 teams (2021)VariesNoNoNoNoMulti-way tie
Foreign Direct Investment International Arbitration [30] 2008International Investor-state dispute settlement VariesYesNoNoYes Murdoch University (2)
Nuremberg [31] 2014 (no rounds in 2020)InternationalInternational criminal law50 teams (2019) [32]
Online: 50 teams (2021) [33]
Nuremberg Qualification by written submissionsYesNoNo Maastricht University (3)
International Maritime Law Arbitration [34] 2000 (no rounds in 2020 and 2021)International International maritime law 34 teams (2020) [35] VariesNoYesNoNo University of Queensland (9)
Stetson Environmental Law1997 (2001 for international rounds)International International environmental law Gulfport YesNoNoYes Law Society of Ireland (4)
Mandela World Human Rights 2009InternationalInternational human rights law164 teams (2018) [36] Pretoria Qualification by written submissionsYesYesYes Norman Manley Law School (3)
LAWASIA [37] 2005 (semi-cancelled in 2019)RegionalInternational commercial arbitration41 teams (2018)
Online: 17 teams (2020)
VariesYes (only Malaysia)NoNoOnly for MalaysiaSingapore Management University (5)
Red Cross IHL [38] 2003 (2004 for international rounds; no rounds in 2020)Regional International humanitarian law 120 teams (2019)Hong KongYes (Hong Kong exempted)NoNoNo* University of Hong Kong (2)
* Victoria University of Wellington (3; 1 online)
African Human Rights [39] 1992Regional Human rights in Africa Varies within AfricaNoNoNoNo
The European Law Moot Court Competition 1988Regional European Union law Luxembourg YesYesNoNo
Asia Cup [40] 1999 (no rounds in 2020)RegionalPublic international law40 teams (2011) Tokyo Qualification by written submissionsYesNoNoNational University of Singapore (6)
International Roman Law Moot Court [41] 2008Regional Roman Law VariesNoNoNoNo University of Cambridge (3)
European Human Rights Moot Court Competition [42] 2012Regional European Convention of Human Rights 120 teams (2013) [43] Strasbourg YesYesNoNo IE University (2; 1 online)

Domestic moot court competitions

A law school's moot courtroom Palacky Court Room 1.JPG
A law school's moot courtroom

North America

Some moot court organisations accept a small group of people for membership, and those members each participate in a number of national or regional moot court competitions. Other schools accept a larger number of members, and each member is matched with one competition. A few schools conduct moot court entirely intramurally. Moot court competitions are typically sponsored by organisations with interest in one particular area of law, and the moot court problems address an issue in that field. Competitions are often judged by legal practitioners with expertise in the particular area of law, or sometimes by sitting judges.

The basic structure of a moot court competition roughly parallels what would happen in actual appellate practice. Participants will typically receive a problem ahead of time, which includes the facts of the underlying case, and often an opinion from a lower court that is being challenged in the problem. Students must then research and prepare for that case as if they were lawyers or advocates for one or sometimes both of the parties. Depending on the competition, participants will be required to submit written briefs, participate in oral argument, or both. The case or problem is often one of current interest, sometimes mimicking an actual case, and sometimes fabricated to address difficult legal issues.

Notable competitions include Ames Moot Court Competition and The Laskin Moot. A number of moot court competitions focus on specific areas of law. For example, the First Amendment Center annually holds a National First Amendment Moot Court Competition, in which the judges have included numerous United States Circuit Court judges. [44]

United Kingdom

In England and Wales, the moot will typically simulate proceedings in either the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court. Moot questions generally involve two questions of law that are under dispute and come with a set of facts about the case that have been decided at the first instance trial. [45] Generally the question will surround a subject that is unclear under the present state of the law and for which no direct precedent exists. It is normal practice for the senior counsel to take on the first point and the junior the second; although this may vary depending upon the exact nature, and necessary length, of the arguments. [46] Typically the question will focus on one area of law, such as tort, contract, criminal law or property law.

In Scotland a moot can be set in a variety of fora; in civil law problems it is set most commonly in either the Inner House of the Court of Session or in the House of Lords, although it is not uncommon for a moot to be heard in the Sheriff Court before the Sheriff or Sheriff Principal. Occasionally, an Employment Appeal Tribunal may also be used as a forum for a Scottish civil law moot. If the moot problem concerns Criminal Law, the moot will most likely be heard as though in the Appellate division of the High Court of Justiciary (commonly known as the Court of Criminal Appeal). Junior counsel is more likely to take the first moot point and senior counsel the second (this can however be reversed depending on the problem). The format of the moot is far more adversarial than that of English and Welsh moots. This manifests itself in different ways, most notably with the appellants and respondents facing each other during a moot, rather than, as in England and Wales, facing the judge.

Notable competitions in the UK include the English Speaking Union Moot and London Universities Mooting Shield.

See also

Related Research Articles

University of Michigan Law School Public law school in Ann Arbor, Michigan

The University of Michigan Law School is the law school of the University of Michigan, a public research university in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Founded in 1859, the school offers Juris Doctor (JD), Master of Laws (LLM), and Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) degree programs.

University of San Diego School of Law

The University of San Diego School of Law, commonly referred to as USD Law, is a law school located on the 182-acre (0.74 km2) campus of the University of San Diego in San Diego, California in the community of Linda Vista. Founded in 1954, the law school has held ABA approval since 1961. It joined the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) in 1966.

University of Miami School of Law

The University of Miami School of Law is the law school of the University of Miami, a private research university in Coral Gables, Florida.

National Law University, Jodhpur Law university in Rajasthan, India

National Law University, Jodhpur (NLUJ) is a public law school and a National Law University established under the National Law University, Jodhpur, Act, 1999 enacted by the Rajasthan State Legislature. The university was established for the advancement of learning, teaching, research and diffusion of knowledge in the field of law. It is one of the autonomous law schools in India.

NALSAR University of Law

The National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR), is a public law school and a National Law University located in Shamirpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. It is among the first universities to offer the five-year integrated undergraduate law degree, post graduate law degree and doctorate law degree. The school is known for its highly competitive admissions. It has an intake of around 120 students selected from a pool of around 80,000 students in its undergraduate law programme.

Willem C. Vis Moot

The Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot or Vis Moot is an international moot competition. Since 1994, it has been held annually in Vienna, Austria, attracting more than 300 law schools from all around the world and spurring the creation of more than 20 pre-moots each year before the actual rounds are held in Vienna. It is the largest arbitration moot competition, and second-largest moot overall, in the world; considered a grand slam or major moot. A sister moot, known as the Willem C. Vis (East) Moot, is held in Hong Kong just before the rounds in Vienna. It was established in 2003 and attracts around 150 teams every year, making it the second largest commercial arbitration moot and also a grand slam moot. It uses the same moot problem as the Vis Moot, as does the various pre-moot friendlies.

Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition

The Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, also known as the Jessup Moot or The Jessup, is the oldest and largest international moot competition in the world, attracting participants from almost 700 law schools in more than 90 countries in recent years. The competition has been described as the most prestigious moot court competition in the world by a large number of organisations and universities internationally, and is one of the grand slam or major moots.

Washington University School of Law Law school in Saint Louis

Washington University in St. Louis School of Law (WashULaw) is the law school of Washington University in St. Louis, a private university in St. Louis, Missouri. WashULaw has consistently ranked among the top law schools in the country; it is currently ranked 16th among the 196 American Bar Association-approved law schools by U.S. News & World Report, and 9th in the country by AboveTheLaw.com. Prominent alumni include numerous U.S. senators, congressmen, governors, cabinet members, federal and state judges, businessmen, and scholars. Founded in 1867, WashULaw is the oldest continuously operating law school west of the Mississippi River. The law school was originally located in downtown St. Louis, but relocated in 1904 to the Danforth Campus of Washington University in St. Louis.

Hidayatullah National Law University Public school and university in New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Hidayatullah National Law University (HNLU) is a public law school and a National Law University in New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. The University is named after the former Chief Justice of India, Justice Mohammad Hidayatullah. It is one of the autonomous law schools in India and being sixth in the series of such national law schools. It was established as a centre for legal excellence by the Government of Chhattisgarh under the Hidayatullah National University of Law, Chhattisgarh, Act. The university offers a B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) integrated Programme, an L.L.M. Programme, and PhD Course.

The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law is a law school in Hong Kong.

University of Belgrade Faculty of Law

The Faculty of Law of the University in Belgrade, also known as the Belgrade Law School, is one of the first-tier educational institutions of the University of Belgrade, Serbia. The building is located in the heart of the old part of Belgrade, in the urban neighborhood of Palilula, contiguously to the city park Tašmajdan, on Bulevar kralja Aleksandra.

The Peking University School of Transnational Law is located in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. The school started in the fall of 2008 as a part of the Shenzhen Graduate School of Peking University. It is the first law school to offer a traditional western-style Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree alongside a Chinese-style Juris Master (J.M.) degree. The program is four years and graduates will receive both the Chinese Juris Master's degree and, not accredited by the ABA, a J.D. degree. STL also offers a 3-year J.D. degree in English and a 1-2-year LL.M. degree. The school's tagline is "China's most innovative law school in China's most innovative city"

Various moot court awards are annually given in the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot in Vienna as well as the Willem C. Vis (East) Moot in Hong Kong. The top prizes in Vienna are the Pieter Sanders Award, the Werner Melis Award, the Martin Domke Award, and the Eric Bergsten Award. Honourable Mentions are also awarded for the best oralists, memoranda, and teams that qualified for the knockout stages in the oral phase.

O. P. Jindal Global University Private university in Haryana, India

O.P. Jindal Global , is a private university located at Sonipat, National Capital Region (India). It was established in 2009 as a philanthropic initiative of its founding chancellor, Naveen Jindal in memory of his father, O.P. Jindal. In 2019, UGC named JGU as an Institute of Eminence, making it one of the ten private universities in India to have received the distinction. The university offers state-of-the-art, innovative and interdisciplinary programmes that are taught by its renowned and qualified faculty members.

The LAWASIA International Moot Competition is an annual international moot court competition that is organised by LAWASIA, an international organisation mainly comprising bar associations, lawyers, judges, and academics. The moot problem ranges from international human rights to international commercial arbitration, and the venue of the competition rotates between LAWASIA member states as it is usually held in conjunction with the annual LAWASIA Conference. Around 30 to 40 law schools from around the world take part in the moot each year; Malaysia is the only member state that conducts national rounds, of which the top two team teams — each university can send multiple teams — are selected for the international rounds. In the international rounds, teams would compete in up to ten rounds if they reach the championship final, which is usually judged by notable judges and practitioners.

Penn State Law Law school in University Park, Pa.

Penn State Law, located in University Park, Pennsylvania, is one of two separately accredited law schools of the Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Law offers J.D., LL.M., and S.J.D. degrees. The school also offers a joint J.D./M.B.A. with the Smeal College of Business, a joint J.D./M.I.A. degree with the School of International Affairs, which is also located in the Lewis Katz Building, as well as joint degrees with other graduate programs at Penn State.

International Criminal Court Moot

The International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition or ICCMCC is an annual international moot court competition on international criminal law that is held at The Hague and organised by the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies of Leiden University, The Hague Campus, with the institutional support of the International Criminal Court and International Bar Association. Pace Law School had conceived of the moot as an in-class exercise in 2004, and it was in 2005 that a domestic competition was started. The competition became international the following year, with the finals being held in 2007. With more than 100 teams from 50 countries taking part annually, the ICCMCC is the world's largest competition on international criminal law and is considered one of the grand slam or major moots.

The K.K. Luthra Memorial Moot Court was started in 2005 in the memory of late Senior Advocate Mr. K.K. Luthra. This is the only international criminal law moot court held in India and has seen participation from top law colleges in India and abroad. It is held every year in January at the Campus Law Centre in Delhi University.

The Nuremberg Moot is an international moot court competition. Held partially at the Nuremberg Palace of Justice and organised by the International Nurmemberg Principles Academy and University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, this competition now attracts around 60 to 100 teams from around the world annually, though not all are selected to participate in Nuremberg. Participants make submissions as though they are before the International Criminal Court. For the 2020 edition, owing to travel restrictions brought about by Covid-19, the tournament winner was adjudged by memorials only. Oral rounds were reinstated for 2021, but held online.

International Roman Law Moot Court

The International Roman Law Moot Court (IRLMC) is an international European annual moot court competition in Roman law.

References

  1. Pattinson, Shaun D.; Kind, Vanessa (2017-09-12). "Using a moot to develop students' understanding of human cloning and statutory interpretation". Medical Law International. 17 (3): 111–133. doi:10.1177/0968533217726350. PMC   5598875 . PMID   28943724.
  2. "Pictet - Nica.team".
  3. "Law School Ranking - Nica.team".
  4. "Rankings".
  5. "Another Season of Record-Breaking International Moot Court Achievements (SMU) - The Singapore Law Gazette". 1 November 2017.
  6. hermes (15 June 2018). "SMU team wins moot contest in The Hague". The Straits Times.
  7. "The 2017/18 International Moots Season in Review". The Singapore Law Gazette. 2018-10-08. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  8. 1 2 "COVID-19 and the 2019/20 International Moots Season". 7 October 2020.
  9. Ganz, Kian. "Mooting Premier League is back: MPL 7 sees Nalsar, UILS, NLS, NLIU lead after strong 2016 start". www.legallyindia.com.
  10. "Home - The International Moot Court Compendium".
  11. "COVID-19 and the 2020/21 International Moots Season". 7 September 2021.
  12. Note: competitions that went fully online because of COVID-19 not inclusive
  13. "ILSA". ILSA. Archived from the original on 2010-09-15. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  14. "Record Number of Teams Set to Compete in Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition - White & Case LLP International Law Firm, Global Law Practice". www.whitecase.com.
  15. "Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot list". Cisg.law.pace.edu. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  16. "CityU Success at the 2021 Vis Moot | Hong Kong Lawyer".
  17. "CityU Success at the 2021 Vis Moot | Hong Kong Lawyer".
  18. "Welcome | Price Media Law Moot Court Programme". Pricemootcourt.socleg.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  19. "ICC-Trial Competition". ICC-Trial Competition. Archived from the original on 2012-03-13. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  20. "Record Number of Registered Teams! | ICC Moot Court Competition".
  21. "investmentmoot.org". investmentmoot.org. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  22. "Frankfurt Investment Arbitration Moot Court :: Results". www.investmentmoot.org.
  23. "lachs winners » International Institute of Space Law". iislweb.org.
  24. "Final report" (PDF). elsa.org.
  25. "About the competition".
  26. "About".
  27. "Finalists for the 16th Oxford International IP Moot Court Announced". 23 January 2018.
  28. "Our History".
  29. "PAX Moot 2022".
  30. "FDI Moot". FDI Moot. 2012-01-01. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  31. Court, Nuremberg Moot. "Home: Nuremberg Moot Court". nuremberg-moot.de.
  32. "Nuremberg Moot Court 2019: Nuremberg Moot Court".
  33. "Nuremberg Moot Court 2021".
  34. "International Maritime Law Arbitration". Law.murdoch.edu.au. 2012-02-08. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  35. http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Law/_document/IMLAM/IMLAM-2019/20th-IMLAM-----Invitation-to-Participate-in-20191.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  36. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2018-05-04. Retrieved 2018-05-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  37. "Welcome to LAWASIA". lawasiamoot.org.
  38. "12th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law Moot 2014".
  39. "African Human Rights Moot Court Competition Retrieved June 24, 2011". Archived from the original on September 15, 2011. Retrieved June 24, 2011.
  40. "Records of Asia Cup 2011". International Law Student Exchange Council. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
  41. University of Cambridge: International Roman Law Moot
  42. "European human rights moot court competition". www.coe.int. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
  43. "European human rights moot court competition - 2013 edition".
  44. National First Amendment Moot Court Competition.
  45. "Mooting Net - How to Moot I". Archived from the original on 2007-12-02. Retrieved 2007-12-08.
  46. "Mooting Net - How to Moot I". Archived from the original on 2007-12-02. Retrieved 2007-12-08.