Lunar penetrometer

Last updated

The lunar penetrometer was a spherical electronic tool that served to measure the load-bearing characteristics of the Moon in preparation for spacecraft landings. [1] [2] It was designed by NASA to be dropped onto the surface from a vehicle orbiting overhead and transmit information to the spacecraft. [3] [4] [5] However, despite it being proposed for several lunar and planetary missions, the device was never actually fielded by NASA. [6]

Contents

History

The lunar penetrometer was first developed in the early 1960s as part of NASA Langley Research Center’s Lunar Penetrometer Program. [7] At the time, immense pressures from the ongoing Space Race caused NASA to shift its focus from conducting purely scientific lunar expeditions to landing a man on the Moon before the Russians.  As a result, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's lunar flight projects, Ranger and Surveyor, were reconfigured to provide direct support to Project Apollo. [6]

One of the major problems that NASA faced in preparation for the Apollo Moon landing was the inability to determine the surface characteristics of the Moon with regard to spacecraft landings and post-landing locomotion of exploratory vehicles and personnel. While radio and optical technology situated on Earth at the time could make out large-scale characteristics such as the size and distribution of mountains and craters, there wasn't an Earth-based method of measuring small-scale features, such as the lunar surface texture and topographical details, with adequate resolution. [8] [9] In 1961, NASA's chief engineer Abe Silverstein proposed to the U.S. Congress that Project Ranger would help provide important data on the Moon's surface topography to facilitate the Apollo lunar landing. Once funding was provided to the Ranger program, Silverstein directed NASA laboratories to investigate potential instruments that could return information on the hardness of the lunar surface. [6]

Introduced shortly after Silverstein's directive, the Lunar Penetrometer Program devised the development of an impact-measuring instrumented projectile, or penetrometer, that provided preliminary information about the Moon's surface. The lunar penetrometer housed an impact accelerometer that measured the deceleration time history of the projectile as it made contact with the lunar surface to measure its hardness, bearing strength, and penetrability as well as a radio telemeter that could transmit the impact information to a remote receiver. Knowledge of the complete impact acceleration time history would have also made it possible for NASA researchers to ascertain the physical composition of the soil and whether it was granular, powdery, or brittle. [8] If successful, the lunar penetrometer was planned for deployment for uncrewed landings in the Ranger and Surveyor programs as well as for the Apollo mission. [5] [9]

However, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Space Sciences Division Manager Robert Meghreblian decided in August 1963 that the use of the lunar penetrometer to provide information on the lunar surface in situ was too risky. Instead, it was decided that the lunar surface composition would be determined by using gamma-ray spectrometry and surface topography via television photography and radar probing. [6] In 1966, the lunar penetrometer was investigated as a potential sounding device for the Apollo missions, but no information exists on whether it was used in that manner. [10]

Design

In order to function properly, the lunar penetrometer was designed to sense the accelerations encountered by the projectile body during the impact process and telemeter the collected information to a nearby receiving station. Doing so required the penetrometer to package an acceleration sensing device as well as an independent telemetry system with a power supply, transmitter, and antenna system. The components also needed to be housed within a casing that could withstand a wide range of impact loads. [9]

The lunar penetrometer came in the form of a spherical omnidirectional penetrometer that did not have to account for the orientation of the penetrometer during impact, which was difficult to factor in an environment with little to no atmosphere like the lunar surface. [9] [11] The omnidirectional design packaged the accelerometer, computer, power supply, and the telemetry system within a 3-inch diameter sphere. [12] The lunar penetrometer's spherical instrumentation compartment had an omnidirectional acceleration sensor located at the center surrounded by concentrically placed batteries and electronic modules. The components were enclosed within an electromagnetic shield that provided a uniform metallic reference for the omnidirectional antenna encircling the instrumentation compartment. [12] Outside the compartment, an impact limiter made out of balsa wood provided shock absorption to limit the impact forces on the internal components to tolerable levels and provided a low overall penetrometer density to assure sensitivity to soft, weak target surfaces. The balsa impact limiter was coated in a thin outer shell made out of fiber-glass epoxy. [5] [12]

Accelerometer

As part of the Lunar Penetrometer Program, the NASA Langley Research Center tasked the Harry Diamond Laboratories (later consolidated to form the U.S. Army Research Laboratory) with the development of the omnidirectional accelerometer for the lunar penetrometer. [3] [4] [7] The omnidirectional accelerometer, or the omnidirectional acceleration sensor, was an accelerometer capable of measuring the acceleration time histories independent of its angular acceleration or orientation at impact. [11] The researchers at Harry Diamond Laboratories originally employed a hollow piezoelectric sphere but later transitioned to modifying a conventional triaxial accelerometer. The instantaneous magnitude of the acceleration was computed by obtaining the square root of the sum of the squares of the three orthogonal, acceleration-time signatures. [7] [13] The omnidirectional accelerometer withstood a maximum of 40,000 G during shock testing and operated using a 20V power supply drawing 10 mA. [12]

Telemetry system

The telemetry system for the lunar penetrometer was commissioned by NASA to the Canadian defence contractor Computing Devices of Canada (now known as General Dynamics Mission Systems). [7] It consisted of a network that fed the output of the accelerometer to a radio frequency power amplifier that was also connected to a master oscillator and a buffer amplifier. The amplifiers and the oscillator functioned together to act as a transmitter, whose outputs were fed to a spherical antenna that was embedded in the outer skin of the penetrometer. [11]

Relay craft

Due to limitations in available power, antenna efficiency, and other factors, the impact acceleration information from the lunar penetrometers could not be transmitted for extensive distances. As a result, a relay craft needed to be placed within the transmission field of the lunar penetrometers to intercept the lunar penetrometer signals and transmit them to a distant receiving station. When located within moderate range of a receiving station like a parent spacecraft, the relay craft served to simply amplify and redirect the lunar penetrometer signals. At greater distances, the relay craft would perform data signal processing where it exchanged the peak power requirement of instantaneous data transmission for longer transmission time to decrease the demands placed upon the power supply. The relay craft functioned so that it would receive the lunar penetrometer signals and transmit them to the receiving station only after the lunar penetrometers landed on the surface and before the relay craft itself crashed onto the ground. As a result, a strict time limit would be imposed on the relay craft to deliver the necessary data sent by the penetrometers. [9]

Operation

During lunar reconnaissance, a payload containing the lunar penetrometer and the relay station structure would be mounted on the spacecraft as it traveled to its destination. Above the lunar surface, the spacecraft would release the payload, which would spin for axis attitude stability and use the main retrorocket motor to reduce the descent velocity. At approximately 5,600 feet above the target area, the second retrorocket would fire once the main retrorocket was jettisoned from the payload. The centrifugal force resulting from the spin stabilization technique would cause a salvo of lunar penetrometers to disperse and free fall toward the lunar surface. The payload carriage would hold 16 lunar penetrometers in total that would be released in salvos of four at about 2 second intervals. The impact of the lunar penetrometers would be categorized as elastic, plastic, or penetration depending on the target surface. After the secondary retrorocket burns out, the payload would free fall to the lunar surface as well. Once the penetrometers make contact with the lunar surface, the impact information would then be transmitted to the descending payload relay station, which would then be relayed to a transmitting antenna system on Earth. In short, this chain of communication would take place within the time interval between the release of the lunar penetrometers and the moment the payload relay station lands on the lunar surface. [11]

Testing

Shock testing

Harry Diamond Laboratories was tasked with developing a high-energy shock testing method that monitored the omnidirectional accelerometer's behavior during acceleration peaking at 20,000 G. Components of the omnidirectional accelerometer, such as the resistors, capacitors, oscillators, and magnetic cores, were subjected to a modified air gun test. The component being tested was placed within a target body inside an extension tube in front of an air gun. The air gun would fire a projectile, impacting the target body and accelerating it to a peak of 20,000 G until it hit the lead target only a short distance away inside the extension tube. The results of the shock test showed that the resistors and capacitors changed very little during shock, while the commercial subcarrier oscillator and the tape-wound magnetic cores were affected considerably. [7]

Impact testing

More than 200 impact tests were conducted with the spherical lunar penetrometer in investigating its soil penetration characteristics. [1] Most consisted of impacting the penetrometers to a wide range of target materials at velocities ranging from 6 to 76 m/s and then recording the measured impact characteristics. [5] Several experiments investigated the penetrometer's ability to predict the depth to which a lunar module would penetrate the surface of the landing zone. The results of these studies found that the lunar penetrometers were successful in not only identifying the nature of the impacted surface, i.e. whether the surface was rigid or collapsible, but also in distinguishing between particulate materials of different bearing strength from peak impact accelerations. The lunar penetrometers were able to accurately predict the conditions of the landing pad penetrations. [14]

Sounding device application

The lunar penetrometer was studied as a potential sounding device for a crewed Apollo lunar module landing in 1966. The device was suggested to assist astronauts in on-the-spot decision making regarding whether a safe landing of the lunar module could be made. Once dropped individually or in salvo within the landing zone, the lunar penetrometers could autonomously transmit an acceleration-time profile upon impact and characterize the surface hardness of the landing zone. A short study on the feasibility of this application was conducted to determine the flight, trajectory, and impact parameters of the lunar penetrometers once launched from a lunar module. The study found that the lunar penetrometer's impact velocities were limited to range from 120 ft/s to 200 ft/s, meaning that the velocities impact angles would have to vary between 54 and 62 percent from the vertical. The earliest that a lunar penetrometer had to be launched was at a range of 3,400 feet and an altitude of 1,075 feet, which would grant the crew in the lunar module 16 seconds to analyze the penetrometer data. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apollo program</span> 1961–1972 American crewed lunar exploration program

The Apollo program, also known as Project Apollo, was the United States human spaceflight program carried out by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which succeeded in preparing and landing the first men on the Moon from 1968 to 1972. It was first conceived in 1960 during President Dwight D. Eisenhower's administration as a three-person spacecraft to follow the one-person Project Mercury, which put the first Americans in space. Apollo was later dedicated to President John F. Kennedy's national goal for the 1960s of "landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth" in an address to Congress on May 25, 1961. It was the third US human spaceflight program to fly, preceded by the two-person Project Gemini conceived in 1961 to extend spaceflight capability in support of Apollo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surveyor program</span> 1960s NASA program to soft-land robotic probes on the Moon

The Surveyor program was a NASA program that, from June 1966 through January 1968, sent seven robotic spacecraft to the surface of the Moon. Its primary goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of soft landings on the Moon. The Surveyor craft were the first American spacecraft to achieve soft landing on an extraterrestrial body. The missions called for the craft to travel directly to the Moon on an impact trajectory, a journey that lasted 63 to 65 hours, and ended with a deceleration of just over three minutes to a soft landing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surveyor 3</span> American lunar lander

Surveyor 3 is the third lander of the American uncrewed Surveyor program sent to explore the surface of the Moon in 1967 and the second to successfully land. It was the first mission to carry a surface-soil sampling-scoop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranger 3</span> 1962 robotic lunar exploration mission by NASA; malfunctioned

Ranger 3 was a space exploration mission conducted by NASA to study the Moon. The Ranger 3 robotic spacecraft was launched January 26, 1962 as part of the Ranger program. Due to a series of malfunctions, the spacecraft missed the Moon by 22,000 mi (35,000 km) and entered a heliocentric orbit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surveyor 1</span> Lunar lander spacecraft

Surveyor 1 was the first lunar soft-lander in the uncrewed Surveyor program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This lunar soft-lander gathered data about the lunar surface that would be needed for the crewed Apollo Moon landings that began in 1969. The successful soft landing of Surveyor 1 on the Ocean of Storms was the first by an American space probe on any extraterrestrial body, occurring on the first attempt and just four months after the first soft Moon landing by the Soviet Union's Luna 9 probe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luna 9</span> 1966 uncrewed space mission of the Soviet Unions Luna programme

Luna 9 (Луна-9), internal designation Ye-6 No.13, was an uncrewed space mission of the Soviet Union's Luna programme. On 3 February 1966, the Luna 9 spacecraft became the first spacecraft to achieve a survivable landing on a celestial body and return imagery from its surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luna 13</span>

Luna 13 was an uncrewed space mission of the Luna program by Soviet Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surveyor 5</span>

Surveyor 5 is the fifth lunar lander of the American uncrewed Surveyor program sent to explore the surface of the Moon. Surveyor 5 landed on Mare Tranquillitatis in 1967. A total of 19,118 images were transmitted to Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars 3</span> Soviet space probe launched in 1971, consisting of a Mars orbiter and lander

Mars 3 was a robotic space probe of the Soviet Mars program, launched May 28, 1971, nine days after its twin spacecraft Mars 2. The probes were identical robotic spacecraft launched by Proton-K rockets with a Blok D upper stage, each consisting of an orbiter and an attached lander. After the Mars 2 lander crashed on the Martian surface, the Mars 3 lander became the first spacecraft to attain a soft landing on Mars, on December 2, 1971. It failed 110 seconds after landing, having transmitted only a gray image with no details. The Mars 2 orbiter and Mars 3 orbiter continued to circle Mars and transmit images back to Earth for another eight months.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apollo Lunar Module</span> NASA crewed Moon landing spacecraft (1969–1972)

The Apollo Lunar Module, originally designated the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM), was the lunar lander spacecraft that was flown between lunar orbit and the Moon's surface during the United States' Apollo program. It was the first crewed spacecraft to operate exclusively in the airless vacuum of space, and remains the only crewed vehicle to land anywhere beyond Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranger 7</span> United States lunar space probe

Ranger 7 was the first space probe of the United States to successfully transmit close images of the lunar surface back to Earth. It was also the first completely successful flight of the Ranger program. Launched on July 28, 1964, Ranger 7 was designed to achieve a lunar-impact trajectory and to transmit high-resolution photographs of the lunar surface during the final minutes of flight up to impact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apollo command and service module</span> Component of the Apollo spacecraft

The Apollo command and service module (CSM) was one of two principal components of the United States Apollo spacecraft, used for the Apollo program, which landed astronauts on the Moon between 1969 and 1972. The CSM functioned as a mother ship, which carried a crew of three astronauts and the second Apollo spacecraft, the Apollo Lunar Module, to lunar orbit, and brought the astronauts back to Earth. It consisted of two parts: the conical command module, a cabin that housed the crew and carried equipment needed for atmospheric reentry and splashdown; and the cylindrical service module which provided propulsion, electrical power and storage for various consumables required during a mission. An umbilical connection transferred power and consumables between the two modules. Just before reentry of the command module on the return home, the umbilical connection was severed and the service module was cast off and allowed to burn up in the atmosphere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apollo PGNCS</span> Apollo spacecraft guidance system

The Apollo primary guidance, navigation, and control system was a self-contained inertial guidance system that allowed Apollo spacecraft to carry out their missions when communications with Earth were interrupted, either as expected, when the spacecraft were behind the Moon, or in case of a communications failure. The Apollo command module (CM) and lunar module (LM), were each equipped with a version of PGNCS. PGNCS, and specifically its computer, were also the command center for all system inputs from the LM, including the alignment optical telescope, the radar system, the manual translation and rotation device inputs by the astronauts as well as other inputs from the LM systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space capsule</span> Type of spacecraft

A space capsule is a spacecraft designed to transport cargo, scientific experiments, and/or astronauts to and from space. Capsules are distinguished from other spacecraft by the ability to survive reentry and return a payload to the Earth's surface from orbit or sub-orbit, and are distinguished from other types of recoverable spacecraft by their blunt shape, not having wings and often containing little fuel other than what is necessary for a safe return. Capsule-based crewed spacecraft such as Soyuz or Orion are often supported by a service or adapter module, and sometimes augmented with an extra module for extended space operations. Capsules make up the majority of crewed spacecraft designs, although one crewed spaceplane, the Space Shuttle, has flown in orbit.

The Apollo Applications Program (AAP) was created as early as 1966 by NASA headquarters to develop science-based human spaceflight missions using hardware developed for the Apollo program. AAP was the ultimate development of a number of official and unofficial Apollo follow-on projects studied at various NASA labs. However, the AAP's ambitious initial plans became an early casualty when the Johnson Administration declined to support it adequately, partly in order to implement its Great Society set of domestic programs while remaining within a $100 billion budget. Thus, Fiscal Year 1967 ultimately allocated $80 million to the AAP, compared to NASA's preliminary estimates of $450 million necessary to fund a full-scale AAP program for that year, with over $1 billion being required for FY 1968. The AAP eventually led to Skylab, which absorbed much of what had been developed under Apollo Applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moon landing</span> Arrival of a spacecraft on the Moons surface

A Moon landing or lunar landing is the arrival of a spacecraft on the surface of the Moon, including both crewed and robotic missions. The first human-made object to touch the Moon was Luna 2 in 1959.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Altair (spacecraft)</span> Planned lander spacecraft component of NASAs cancelled Project Constellation

The Altair spacecraft, previously known as the Lunar Surface Access Module or LSAM, was the planned lander spacecraft component of NASA's cancelled Constellation program. Astronauts would have used the spacecraft for landings on the Moon, which was intended to begin around 2019. The Altair spacecraft was planned to be used both for lunar sortie and lunar outpost missions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravity turn</span> Spacecraft launch or descent maneuver

A gravity turn or zero-lift turn is a maneuver used in launching a spacecraft into, or descending from, an orbit around a celestial body such as a planet or a moon. It is a trajectory optimization that uses gravity to steer the vehicle onto its desired trajectory. It offers two main advantages over a trajectory controlled solely through the vehicle's own thrust. First, the thrust is not used to change the spacecraft's direction, so more of it is used to accelerate the vehicle into orbit. Second, and more importantly, during the initial ascent phase the vehicle can maintain low or even zero angle of attack. This minimizes transverse aerodynamic stress on the launch vehicle, allowing for a lighter launch vehicle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unified S-band</span> Tracking and communication system developed by NASA and JPL

The Unified S-band (USB) system is a tracking and communication system developed for the Apollo program by NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). It operated in the S band portion of the microwave spectrum, unifying voice communications, television, telemetry, command, tracking and ranging into a single system to save size and weight and simplify operations. The USB ground network was managed by the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Commercial contractors included Collins Radio, Blaw-Knox, Motorola and Energy Systems.

References

  1. 1 2 Lunar Surface Studies: A Continuing Bibliography with Indexes (PDF) (Report). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. April 1967. NASA SP-7003.
  2. "Who was Harry Diamond?". Daily Illini. November 1, 1966. Retrieved March 9, 2020.
  3. 1 2 U.S. Army Materiel Command Harry Diamond Laboratories (Report). Harry Diamond Laboratories via Google Books.
  4. 1 2 "Harry Diamond Labs Backed by Proud Record of R&D Advances" (PDF). Army Research and Development. Vol. 6, no. 7. July 1965. pp. 32–35. Retrieved March 9, 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 McCarty, John; Carden, Huey (April 1968). Response Characteristics of Impacting Penetrometers Appropriate to Lunar and Planetary Missions (PDF) (Report). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA TN D-4454.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Hall, R. (2010). Lunar Impact: The NASA History of Project Ranger (PDF). Dover Publications. pp. 112–120, 214. ISBN   978-0486477572.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Buschman, A.J. (May 1967). Component Evaluation During Shock (PDF) (Report). Harry Diamond Laboratories. TM-67-7. Retrieved January 3, 2023 via Defense Technical Information Center.
  8. 1 2 Beswick, Alfred (October 1964). Instrumentation for Investigation the Physical Properties of the Lunar Surface (PDF). 19th Annual Instrument Society of America. New York, New York. Retrieved March 9, 2020.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 McCarty, John; Beswick, Alfred; Brooks, George (August 1964). Application of Penetrometers to the Study of Physical Properties of Lunar and Planetary Surfaces (Report). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA TN D-2413 via Google Books.
  10. 1 2 Research, Development, and Preliminary Design for the Lunar Penetrometer System Applicable to the Apollo Program (PDF) (Report). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. June 3, 1966. U-3608.
  11. 1 2 3 4 USpatent 3339404,Brooks, George; McCarty, John& Beswick, Alfred,"Lunar Penetrometer",published September 5, 1967
  12. 1 2 3 4 Buschman, A.J. (February 1966). "Omnidirectional Acceleration Sensor". The Shock and Vibration Bulletin. U.S. Naval Research Laboratory: 55–60 via Google Books.
  13. Scientific Technical Aerospace Reports (Report). Vol. 4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. August 23, 1966. p. 3078 via Google Books.
  14. McCarty, John; Carden, Huey (1968). Experimental Study of Vertical Impacts of an LM-Ltype Landing Gear Assembly Under Simulated Lunar Gravity (PDF) (Report). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA TN D-4711.