Related Research Articles
Psychometrics is a field of study within psychology concerned with the theory and technique of measurement. Psychometrics generally covers specialized fields within psychology and education devoted to testing, measurement, assessment, and related activities. Psychometrics is concerned with the objective measurement of latent constructs that cannot be directly observed. Examples of latent constructs include intelligence, introversion, mental disorders, and educational achievement. The levels of individuals on nonobservable latent variables are inferred through mathematical modeling based on what is observed from individuals' responses to items on tests and scales.
Educational Testing Service (ETS), founded in 1947, is the world's largest private educational testing and assessment organization. It is headquartered in Lawrence Township, New Jersey, but has a Princeton address.
In psychometrics, item response theory (IRT) is a paradigm for the design, analysis, and scoring of tests, questionnaires, and similar instruments measuring abilities, attitudes, or other variables. It is a theory of testing based on the relationship between individuals' performances on a test item and the test takers' levels of performance on an overall measure of the ability that item was designed to measure. Several different statistical models are used to represent both item and test taker characteristics. Unlike simpler alternatives for creating scales and evaluating questionnaire responses, it does not assume that each item is equally difficult. This distinguishes IRT from, for instance, Likert scaling, in which "All items are assumed to be replications of each other or in other words items are considered to be parallel instruments". By contrast, item response theory treats the difficulty of each item as information to be incorporated in scaling items.
A Likert scale is a psychometric scale named after its inventor, American social psychologist Rensis Likert, which is commonly used in research questionnaires. It is the most widely used approach to scaling responses in survey research, such that the term is often used interchangeably with rating scale, although there are other types of rating scales.
A questionnaire is a research instrument that consists of a set of questions for the purpose of gathering information from respondents through survey or statistical study. A research questionnaire is typically a mix of close-ended questions and open-ended questions. Open-ended, long-term questions offer the respondent the ability to elaborate on their thoughts. The Research questionnaire was developed by the Statistical Society of London in 1838.
The Rasch model, named after Georg Rasch, is a psychometric model for analyzing categorical data, such as answers to questions on a reading assessment or questionnaire responses, as a function of the trade-off between the respondent's abilities, attitudes, or personality traits, and the item difficulty. For example, they may be used to estimate a student's reading ability or the extremity of a person's attitude to capital punishment from responses on a questionnaire. In addition to psychometrics and educational research, the Rasch model and its extensions are used in other areas, including the health profession, agriculture, and market research.
The polytomous Rasch model is generalization of the dichotomous Rasch model. It is a measurement model that has potential application in any context in which the objective is to measure a trait or ability through a process in which responses to items are scored with successive integers. For example, the model is applicable to the use of Likert scales, rating scales, and to educational assessment items for which successively higher integer scores are intended to indicate increasing levels of competence or attainment.
The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)'s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) is a series of international assessments of the mathematics and science knowledge of students around the world. The participating students come from a diverse set of educational systems in terms of economic development, geographical location, and population size. In each of the participating educational systems, a minimum of 4,000 to 5,000 students is evaluated. Contextual data about the conditions in which participating students learn mathematics and science are collected from the students and their teachers, their principals, and their parents via questionnaires.
Psychometric software refers to specialized programs used for the psychometric analysis of data obtained from tests, questionnaires, polls or inventories that measure latent psychoeducational variables. Although some psychometric analyses can be performed using general statistical software such as SPSS, most require specialized tools designed specifically for psychometric purposes.
Benjamin Drake Wright was an American psychometrician. He is largely responsible for the widespread adoption of Georg Rasch's measurement principles and models. In the wake of what Rasch referred to as Wright's “almost unbelievable activity in this field” in the period from 1960 to 1972, Rasch's ideas entered the mainstream in high-stakes testing, professional certification and licensure examinations, and in research employing tests, and surveys and assessments across a range of fields. Wright's seminal contributions to measurement continued until 2001, and included articulation of philosophical principles, production of practical results and applications, software development, development of estimation methods and model fit statistics, vigorous support for students and colleagues, and the founding of professional societies and new publications.
Educational measurement refers to the use of educational assessments and the analysis of data such as scores obtained from educational assessments to infer the abilities and proficiencies of students. The approaches overlap with those in psychometrics. Educational measurement is the assigning of numerals to traits such as achievement, interest, attitudes, aptitudes, intelligence and performance.
Anton K. Formann was an Austrian research psychologist, statistician, and psychometrician. He is renowned for his contributions to item response theory, latent class analysis, the measurement of change, mixture models, categorical data analysis, and quantitative methods for research synthesis (meta-analysis).
David Andrich is an Australian academic and assessment specialist. He has made substantial contributions to quantitative social science including seminal work on the Polytomous Rasch model for measurement, which is used in the social sciences, in health and other areas.
Klaus D. Kubinger, is a psychologist as well as a statistician, professor for psychological assessment at the University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology. His main research work focuses on fundamental research of assessment processes and on application and advancement of Item response theory models. He is also known as a textbook author of psychological assessment on the one hand and on statistics on the other hand.
The Mokken scale is a psychometric method of data reduction. A Mokken scale is a unidimensional scale that consists of hierarchically-ordered items that measure the same underlying, latent concept. This method is named after the political scientist Rob Mokken who suggested it in 1971.
Computational psychometrics is an interdisciplinary field fusing theory-based psychometrics, learning and cognitive sciences, and data-driven AI-based computational models as applied to large-scale/high-dimensional learning, assessment, biometric, or psychological data. Computational psychometrics is frequently concerned with providing actionable and meaningful feedback to individuals based on measurement and analysis of individual differences as they pertain to specific areas of enquiry.
Automatic item generation (AIG), or automated item generation, is a process linking psychometrics with computer programming. It uses a computer algorithm to automatically create test items that are the basic building blocks of a psychological test. The method was first described by John R. Bormuth in the 1960s but was not developed until recently. AIG uses a two-step process: first, a test specialist creates a template called an item model; then, a computer algorithm is developed to generate test items. So, instead of a test specialist writing each individual item, computer algorithms generate families of items from a smaller set of parent item models. More recently, neural networks, including Large Language Models, such as the GPT family, have been used successfully for generating items automatically.
Randy Elliot Bennett is an American educational researcher who specializes in educational assessment. He is currently the Norman O. Frederiksen Chair in Assessment Innovation at Educational Testing Service in Princeton, NJ. His research and writing focus on bringing together advances in cognitive science, technology, and measurement to improve teaching and learning. He received the ETS Senior Scientist Award in 1996, the ETS Career Achievement Award in 2005, the Teachers College, Columbia University Distinguished Alumni Award in 2016, Fellow status in the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2017, the National Council on Measurement in Education's (NCME) Bradley Hanson Award for Contributions to Educational Measurement in 2019, the E. F. Lindquist Award from AERA and ACT in 2020, elected membership in the National Academy of Education in 2022, and the AERA Cognition and Assessment Special Interest Group Outstanding Contribution to Research in Cognition and Assessment Award in 2024. Randy Bennett was elected President of both the International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA), a worldwide organization primarily constituted of governmental and NGO measurement organizations, and the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), whose members are employed in universities, testing organizations, state and federal education departments, and school districts.
Mark Daniel Reckase is an educational psychologist and expert on quantitative methods and measurement who is known for his work on computerized adaptive testing, multidimensional item response theory, and standard setting in educational and psychological tests. Reckase is University Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the College of Education at Michigan State University.
Jacqueline P. Leighton is a Canadian-Chilean educational psychologist, academic and author. She is a full professor in the Faculty of Education as well as vice-dean of Faculty Development and Faculty Affairs at the University of Alberta.
References
- ↑ "Our Staff - Matthias von Davier". timssandpirls.bc.edu.
- ↑ "Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment". Springer.
- 1 2 "Presenters, Moderators, and Discussants' Biographies" (PDF).
- 1 2 "Awards - NCME". www.ncme.org.
- 1 2 "Awards". www.aera.net.
- ↑ "2021 AERA Fellows". www.aera.net.
- ↑ "Matthias von Davier Newly Elected Member of the National Academy of Education | IEA.nl". www.iea.nl.
- ↑ "New Executive Editor for Psychometrika". Psychometric Society. July 24, 2023.
- ↑ "Large-scale Assessments in Education". SpringerOpen.
- ↑ "Anastasi Lecture 2022 | Fordham". www.fordham.edu.
- ↑ "Conference Program | IEA.nl". www.iea.nl.
- ↑ Yelie, Yuan (April 17, 2023). "Interdisciplinary Seminar: Matthias von Davier, Boston College | Department of Statistics".
- ↑ "Guest lecture: Dr. Matthias von Davier - Munich Center of the Learning Sciences - LMU Munich". www.en.mcls.uni-muenchen.de.
- ↑ "PIAAC Methodological Seminar" (PDF).
- ↑ "Bio". September 2, 2016.
- ↑ "Matthias Von Davier | National Education Policy Center". nepc.colorado.edu.
- ↑ "NEPS > Project Overview > Advisory Experts > Matthias von Davier". www.neps-data.de.
- ↑ "Our Staff - Matthias von Davier". timssandpirls.bc.edu.
- ↑ "Meet Matthias von Davier - Lynch School of Education and Human Development". Boston College.
- ↑ "Matthias von Davier - Lynch School of Education and Human Development". Boston College.
- ↑ "Parallel computing for data analysis using generalized latent variable models".
- ↑ "Systems and methods for evaluating multilingual text sequences".
- ↑ "Mixture general diagnostic model".
- ↑ "System and Method for Large Scale Survey Analysis". www.ets.org.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Rost, Jürgen (June 11, 1995). Fischer, Gerhard H.; Molenaar, Ivo W. (eds.). Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. Springer. pp. 371–379. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7_20 – via Springer Link.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias (February 11, 2014). "The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency". British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 67 (1): 49–71. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12003. PMID 23297749 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias (December 11, 2016). "High-Performance Psychometrics: The Parallel-E Parallel-M Algorithm for Generalized Latent Variable Models". ETS Research Report Series. 2016 (2): 1–11. doi:10.1002/ets2.12120 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Cho, Youngmi; Pan, Tianshu (March 2019). "Effects of Discontinue Rules on Psychometric Properties of Test Scores". Psychometrika. 84 (1): 147–163. doi:10.1007/s11336-018-09652-3. PMID 30607661.
- 1 2 Ulitzsch, Esther; von Davier, Matthias; Pohl, Steffi (November 11, 2020). "A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response". British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 73 (S1): 83–112. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12188 – via CrossRef.
- 1 2 Leng, Dihao; Bezirhan, Ummugul; Khorramdel, Lale; Fishbein, Bethany; von Davier, Matthias (April 24, 2024). "Examining Gender Differences in TIMSS 2019 Using a Multiple-Group Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model". Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. doi: 10.1111/emip.12606 .
- 1 2 von Davier, Matthias (December 1, 2018). "Automated Item Generation with Recurrent Neural Networks". Psychometrika. 83 (4): 847–857. doi:10.1007/s11336-018-9608-y. PMID 29532403 – via Springer Link.
- 1 2 Bezirhan, Ummugul; von Davier, Matthias (January 2023). "Automated reading passage generation with OpenAI's large language model - ScienceDirect". Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 5. arXiv: 2304.04616 . doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100161.
- 1 2 Jung, Ji Yoon; Tyack, Lillian; von Davier, Matthias (April 8, 2024). "Combining machine translation and automated scoring in international large-scale assessments". Large-scale Assessments in Education. 12 (1): 10. doi: 10.1186/s40536-024-00199-7 .
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Khorramdel, Lale; He, Qiwei; Shin, Hyo Jeong; Chen, Haiwen (December 11, 2019). "Developments in Psychometric Population Models for Technology-Based Large-Scale Assessments: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities". Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 44 (6): 671–705. doi:10.3102/1076998619881789 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Yamamoto, Kentaro; Shin, Hyo Jeong; Chen, Henry; Khorramdel, Lale; Weeks, Jon; Davis, Scott; Kong, Nan; Kandathil, Mat (July 4, 2019). "Evaluating item response theory linking and model fit for data from PISA 2000–2012". Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 26 (4): 466–488. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1586642 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ "PISA 2022 Technical Report" (PDF).
- ↑ "Applying the Mixed Rasch Model to Personality Questionnaires".
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Naemi, Bobby; Roberts, Richard D. (October 11, 2012). "Factorial Versus Typological Models: A Comparison of Methods for Personality Data". Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective. 10 (4): 185–208. doi:10.1080/15366367.2012.732798 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Shin, Hyo-Jeong; Khorramdel, Lale; Stankov, Lazar (June 11, 2018). "The Effects of Vignette Scoring on Reliability and Validity of Self-Reports". Applied Psychological Measurement. 42 (4): 291–306. doi:10.1177/0146621617730389. PMC 5978608 . PMID 29881126.
- ↑ Pohl, Steffi; Ulitzsch, Esther; von Davier, Matthias (April 23, 2021). "Reframing rankings in educational assessments". Science. 372 (6540): 338–340. Bibcode:2021Sci...372..338P. doi:10.1126/science.abd3300. PMID 33888624 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ "Matthias von Davier". scholar.google.com.
- ↑ Bradstreet, Thomas E.; Cohen, Allan S.; Anderson-Cook, Christine M.; Cook, John R.; Robinson, Timothy J.; Cavanaugh, Joseph; Embrechts, Paul; Oleson, Jacob J. (2008). "Telegraphic Reviews". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 103 (481): 433–436. doi:10.1198/jasa.2008.s227. JSTOR 27640065 – via JSTOR.
- ↑ Ackerman, Terry (July 3, 2015). "Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis. New York, NY: CRC Press". International Journal of Testing. 15 (3): 274–289. doi:10.1080/15305058.2015.1034867 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ Bao, Yu; Mireles, Nicolas Emundo (October 2, 2023). "Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models: Models and Model Extensions, Applications, Software Packages Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models: Models and Model Extensions, Applications, Software Packages , by Matthias von Davier, Young-Sun Lee, New York, United States, Springer, 2019, 656 pp., ISBN: 978-3-030-05583-7: by Matthias von Davier, Young-Sun Lee, New York, United States, Springer, 2019, 656 pp., ISBN: 978-3-030-05583-7". Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 21 (4): 282–285. doi:10.1080/15366367.2022.2159686 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ Rutkowski, Leslie; Gonzalez, Eugenio; Joncas, Marc; von Davier, Matthias (March 11, 2010). "International Large-Scale Assessment Data: Issues in Secondary Analysis and Reporting". Educational Researcher. 39 (2): 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias; Gonzalez, Eugenio; Mislevy, Robert (January 30, 2009). "What are plausible values and why are they useful?" (PDF). ETS Research Report Series.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias (November 11, 2008). "A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data". British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 61 (2): 287–307. doi:10.1348/000711007X193957. PMID 17535481 – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias (December 11, 2005). "A General Diagnostic Model Applied to Language Testing Data". ETS Research Report Series. 2005 (2): i–35. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2005.tb01993.x – via CrossRef.
- ↑ von Davier, Matthias (December 11, 2014). "The Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnostic Model ( LCDM ) as a Special Case of the General Diagnostic Model ( GDM )". ETS Research Report Series. 2014 (2): 1–13. doi:10.1002/ets2.12043 – via CrossRef.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| Other | |
