Mayoral control of schools

Last updated

Mayoral control of schools is governance over American schools based on the business model, in which the mayor of a city replaces an elected board of education (school board) with an appointed board. The mayor may also directly appoint the head of the school system, called the CEO, superintendent or chancellor. [1] Also known as integrated governance, mayoral control of schools is in contrast to the structure it replaces: an elected board that governs schools independently from the formal influence of the mayor. [2]

Contents

Mayors govern the school districts in two of the United States' three largest cities: Chicago (since 1995) and New York City (since 2002). Mayors also control various other medium-to-large districts as well, including District of Columbia Public Schools. According to a survey of school board members compiled for the National School Board Association, 96 percent of respondents report that membership on their board is determined by election. [3] As of October 2011, evidence of existing or attempted mayoral control was found in about 20 major districts around the United States. [4] Perhaps the most high-profile case of mayoral control is New York City where Michael Bloomberg won the right to appoint the head of schools in June 2002. [5]

Despite limited reach, there are a plethora of mayoral controlled governance structures. In Chicago, the mayor appoints the CEO (superintendent) as well as the entire school board. In Washington, DC, the mayor has power to directly select the chancellor, who must be confirmed by the city council. All D.C. state board of education members are elected but the state board of education acts in a largely advisory capacity to the state education agency. [6] New York’s mayor also has the power to select the head of schools, in addition to appointing eight of thirteen school board members. In Boston, the mayor’s powers extend only to appointing a committee from a list of nominees. It is this appointed board that is entrusted with the job of selecting a superintendent of schools. [7]

History of mayoral control of schools

According to scholar Deborah Land of Johns Hopkins University, the origins of a system in which lay individuals were given the authority to govern their local schools dates back more than 200 years. [8] From the inception of school boards, there was skepticism about the ability of distant politicians to see and meet the needs of local neighborhoods when it came to education. As a result, boards of education were morphed over time to ensure maximum local control of schools. It was believed that separating governance of schools from state and local elected officials was the best way to realize the Progressive Era vision of schools protected from politics. [9] The trend toward mayoral control represents a reversal of this trend, with arguments for and against discussed in a later section.

While mayoral control in some cities such as Jackson, Mississippi, has existed since the mid-20th century, [10] most shifts from elected to appointed school boards took place after 1990. [2] Starting in the 1990s, mayoral control was viewed by its supporters as a way to address the chronic underperformance and jumpstart reforms in medium to large urban districts. The first major urban district to move toward mayoral control of schools was Boston, where, in 1991, the Massachusetts governor and legislature approved a petition allowing the mayor to appoint a seven-member board, which then appointed a superintendent of schools. [10] The latest high-profile urban district to move under mayoral control was Washington, DC, where Mayor Adrian Fenty won the right to select the chancellor of schools in 2007. [11] The table below shows the school districts that are now under the governance of mayor-appointed boards and, in some cases, mayor-appointed heads of schools.

LocationSchool systemMayoral control
since
Notes
Jackson, Mississippi Jackson Public School District 1950sPre-dates later trend. [10]
Boston, Massachusetts Boston Public Schools 1991Mayor appoints seven-member school committee, which appoints superintendent. [10]
Chicago, Illinois Chicago Public Schools 1995Mayor appoints seven-member Chicago Board of Education; appointees do not require approval of Chicago City Council. [10]
Baltimore, Maryland Baltimore City Public Schools 1997Under a deal made between the city and the state in 1997, [12] the mayor formerly jointly appointed school board members with the governor of Maryland. [10] During this period, the mayor was required to gain the approval of the governor to fill vacancies and remove board members. [12] The state legislature ultimately ended this arrangement, and in 2017 the mayor gained full control over city schools. A law passed in 2016, however, will add two elected commissioners to the Board, beginning in 2022. [12]
Cleveland, Ohio Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1998Mayor appoints seven-member school board. [10]
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania School District of Philadelphia 2001In 2001 takeover of the school district by the state, two members of the School Reform Commission are appointed by the mayor and three are appointed by the governor of Pennsylvania. [10] Since July 2018, the School Reform Commission was disbanded and replaced with the Board of Education whose members are appointed by the Mayor of Philadelphia and approved by the Philadelphia City Council
New York City New York City Department of Education 2002The New York State Legislature conferred the mayor of New York City with full control over public schools in 2002. [10] In 2009, legislation to reauthorize mayoral control of schools stalled in the New York State Senate and briefly caused control of schools to technically revert to the old Board of Education; however, legislation was soon passed to extend mayoral control. [13] [14] In 2017, mayoral control again briefly lapsed due to legislative negotiations; a bill ultimately extended mayoral control for another two years. [15] [16]
Providence, Rhode Island Providence Public School District 2003Mayor appoints nine-member school beard, but requires consent of city council. [10]
District of Columbia District of Columbia Public Schools 2007In 2007, the Council of the District of Columbia removed power over city schools from an elected Board of Authority and gave it to a chancellor who is appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the Council. [17]

Other locations have varying degrees of mayoral control over schools: in Oakland, California, three of the 10 members of the Oakland Unified School District board members are appointed by the mayor, and the other seven are elected. [4] Mayoral control proposals have also been made in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Seattle. [10]

Notably, not all attempts at achieving mayoral control have been successful. Mayor of Los Angeles Antonio Villaraigosa sought to bring the Los Angeles Unified School District under his management, but before the plan could be brought into effect in 2007, a court ruled that it violated the California Constitution. [10] In Detroit in the late 1990s, a reform board appointed by the mayor and governor replaced the elected board of education in response to allegations of mismanagement. This reform was reversed in city referendum in 2005 which reinstated an elected school board. [18]

Arguments for mayoral control

Proponents of mayoral control point to two major reasons for shifting from an elected to appointed governance structure: the benefits of a single point of accountability and the power of sustained, aligned leadership. On the point of accountability, supporters of mayoral control point to the extremely low turnout for often off-cycle school board elections as evidence of the lack of school board accountability and relevance. [19] Expounding on this point, Finn and Keegan point out that in districts under mayoral control, "there is now a single, publicly accountable official in charge, rather than nine wannabe mayors immobilizing the school system with their petty squabbles, power grabs, and turf protecting. If citizens are unhappy with the schools, they can now vote the mayor out of office. This does not eliminate democratic control over the schools; it rechannels—and strengthens—it". Former appointed CEO of the mayoral controlled Chicago Public Schools and U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has made his support for mayoral control of schools clear, offering his help to mayors who push to gain sole leadership of the schools within their cities. [20] His support is also rooted in a belief that one point of accountability—the mayor—is far more effective than accountability spread across an elected board of education model. [21]

The second major rationale used to support mayoral control is the power of sustained, aligned leadership. The average tenure of urban superintendents is less than four years—an unfortunate consequence of the frequent turnover in board membership and the shifting winds of local interests. [22] In cities where the mayors provide job stability for superintendents and focus the energy of the public and private sectors of a city on designated education priorities, the theory goes that more will be accomplished in areas ranging from improving student achievement to ensuring sound fiscal management. [23] In Boston, for instance, it is reported that mayoral control "engendered continuity in leadership and a new focus on learning". [7]

Arguments against mayoral control

Opponents of mayoral control typically cite two major issues with the shift. Most importantly, mayoral control represents an affront to democratic, public participation in school governance. Many worry that taking popular elections of school board members out of the school governance formula prevents local neighborhoods from having any say in how their interests are represented. [2] As Hess admits, "some voices are likely to be silenced or marginalized under an appointed board". [22] A related complaint focuses on the lack of transparency that accompanies appointed school boards. Comparing appointed school boards to the board malfeasance in private sector companies such as Enron points to the danger of having a single-minded board take control of any entity. [22]

Overall, the question of whether to elect or appoint boards of education requires a thoughtful consideration of the "appropriate balance" between responsiveness and responsibility. [22]

Impact of mayoral control on student outcomes

Perhaps the most important piece of evidence in the debate between the proponents and opponents of mayoral control is whether mayoral control has measurable impacts on student achievement. After collecting and analyzing the research on school board effectiveness produced over the past twenty-five years, scholar Deborah Land concluded that there is "not yet convincing evidence that appointment of school board members produces…greater academic achievement." [8] Similarly, while unwilling to dismiss the connection between strong mayoral involvement and student achievement outright, researchers at the Institute on Education Law and Policy at Rutgers University— Newark "were unable to establish conclusively that the change in governance had any causal relationship to improved performance, or that, using nationally normed test data, our [mayoral controlled] cities had greater improvements than anywhere else". [24] Additionally, an analysis of top-down market-based reform efforts in three mayoral controlled cities, Chicago, New York City and Washington DC, indicate the efforts "deliver few benefits, often harm the students they purport to help, and divert attention from a set of other, less visible policies with more promise to weaken the link between poverty and low educational attainment." [25]

Alternatively, a 2013 study by researchers at the Center for American Progress found that, of the eleven districts governed by some degree of mayoral leadership, five made substantial improvement in narrowing the student achievement gap, and four others showed progress on some measures. That same study found that mayoral control in New York City had improved the performance of African American and Latino students in fourth and eighth grade by between 1 and 3 percent annually. [26]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chicago Public Schools</span> Public school system of the municipal government of Chicago, Illinois

Chicago Public Schools (CPS), officially classified as City of Chicago School District #299 for funding and districting reasons, in Chicago, Illinois, is the third-largest school district in the United States, after New York and Los Angeles.

Cleveland Metropolitan School District, formerly the Cleveland Municipal School District, is a public school district in the U.S. state of Ohio that serves almost all of the city of Cleveland. The district covers 79 square miles. The Cleveland district is the second largest PreK-12 district in the state, with a 2017–2018 enrollment of about 38,949. CMSD has 68 schools that are for kindergarten to eighth grade students and 39 schools for high school aged students.

The School District of Philadelphia (SDP) is the school district that includes all school district-operated public schools in Philadelphia. Established in 1818, it is the 8th largest school district in the nation, by enrollment, serving over 200,000 students.

The District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) is the local public school system for the District of Columbia, in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York City Department of Education</span> Department of the government of New York City

The New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE) is the department of the government of New York City that manages the city's public school system. The City School District of the City of New York is the largest school system in the United States, with over 1.1 million students taught in more than 1,800 separate schools. The department covers all five boroughs of New York City, and has an annual budget of $38 billion.The department is run by the Panel for Educational Policy and New York City Schools Chancellor. The current chancellor is David C. Banks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Summit Public Schools</span> School district in Union County, New Jersey, United States

The Summit Public Schools is a comprehensive community public school district that serves students in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade from Summit, in Union County, New Jersey, United States.

The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development d/b/a ASCD is a membership-based non-profit organization founded in 1943. It has more than 125,000 members from more than 128 countries, including superintendents, principals, teachers, professors of education, and other educators. The ASCD Community also includes 52 affiliate organizations, self-organized Connected Communities, and ASCD Student Chapters. While ASCD was initially founded with a focus on curriculum and supervision, the association now provides its members with professional development, educational leadership, and capacity building. ASCD is a global community advancing student achievement by supporting the whole child, and seeks to develop programs, products, and services essential to the way educators learn, teach, and lead.

Patricia Wasley, EdD, is the Chief Executive Officer at Teaching Channel and is responsible for setting the educational direction of the website. Prior to joining Teaching Channel, Dr. Wasley was dean of the College of Education at the University of Washington from 2000 to 2012. Wasley has conducted a variety of research on student voice, teacher education and whole-school reform. She is the author of several books on school reform, including Teachers Who Lead and Stirring the Chalkdust, and is the co-author of Kids and School Reform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government of the District of Columbia</span> Government of the District of Columbia, in the United States

The Government of the District of Columbia operates under Article One of the United States Constitution and the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which devolves certain powers of the United States Congress to the Mayor and thirteen-member Council. However, Congress retains the right to review and overturn laws created by the council and intervene in local affairs.

Local government in New Jersey is composed of counties and municipalities. Local jurisdictions in New Jersey differ from those in some other states because every square foot of the state is part of exactly one municipality; each of the 564 municipalities is in exactly one county; and each of the 21 counties has more than one municipality. New Jersey has no independent cities, or consolidated city-counties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Schenectady City School District</span> School district in the U.S. state of New York

The Schenectady City School District is a public city school district in the city of Schenectady in Schenectady County, New York. The district has 17 operating school buildings and is a component district of the Capital Region Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES). It was established in 1854 and served 9,256 students in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade in the 2018-2019 school year.

Allegra "Happy" Haynes is a Denver politician and consultant who formerly served on the Denver City Council and was an aide to two mayors.

Arlene C. Ackerman was an American educator who served as superintendent of the District of Columbia Public Schools, San Francisco Unified School District, and Philadelphia Public Schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia Public Charter School Board</span> School authority of the U.S. capital

The District of Columbia Public Charter School Board is the regulatory authority and sole authorizer of all public charter schools in the District of Columbia, in the United States. It provides oversight to 69 independently-run nonprofits and 135 public charter schools which educate more than 45,000 students living in every ward of the city. The Board is tasked with approving, monitoring, and evaluating schools, creating policies and conditions to empower educators to do their best work, and actively engaging families, schools, and communities to inform decision-making.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shawn Arévalo McCollough</span>

Shawn Arévalo McCollough is president and CEO of the American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence in Washington, DC. A former superintendent of schools, principal, and teacher, McCollough's reform efforts have been recognized by George W. Bush, and U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige.

A Chief Executive Officer of public schools, or a CEO of schools is an educational professional who is responsible for the administration of a public school district. Similarly to a receiver, CEOs replace traditional superintendents in managing the daily operations of struggling school districts in an attempt to improve failing schools. With the introduction of private market ideas into the school system, CEOs are generally given unilateral power to enact necessary reforms. This concept was first introduced by the Chicago Public School System in 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia State Board of Education</span>

The District of Columbia State Board of Education (SBOE) is an independent executive branch agency of the Government of the District of Columbia, in the United States. The SBOE provides advocacy and policy guidance for the District of Columbia Public Schools, and works with the Chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools and the District of Columbia State Superintendent of Education. Charter schools are overseen by the District of Columbia Public Charter School Board.

The Chicago Board of Education serves as the board of education for the Chicago Public Schools.

Airick Journey Crabill is an American education reform advocate and public speaker on education reform. He currently serves as the national school board governance leader at the Council of the Great City Schools. Prior to this position, he was Texas Education Agency's Deputy Commissioner for Governance. Crabill served eight years (2008–2016) on the board of the Kansas City Public Schools, serving as president for a majority of his tenure.

Ted D. Kimbrough was an American educator who served as superintendent of Chicago Public Schools, Sacramento Unified School District, and Compton Unified School District.

References

  1. Resmovits, Joy (August 16, 2010). "Taking Schools Into Their Own Hands". Wall Street Journal .
  2. 1 2 3 Wong, Kenneth K., et al. The Education Mayor: Improving America's Schools. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007. Print.
  3. Hess, Frederick M., "School Boards at the Dawn of the 21st Century: Conditions and Challenges of District Governance." Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association, 2002.
  4. 1 2 Education Commission of the States. "Local School Boards". Archived from the original on December 8, 2014. Retrieved October 28, 2011.
  5. Goodnough, Abby (September 4, 2002). "Justice Dept. Allows a Shift in School Powers". New York Times .
  6. "Management Principles and the Washington DC Public Schools" . Retrieved January 22, 2018.
  7. 1 2 Viteritti, Joseph P., ed. When Mayors Take Charge: School Governance in the City. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2009.
  8. 1 2 Land, Deborah (2002). "Local School Boards Under Review: Their Role and Effectiveness in Relation to Students' Academic Achievement". Review of Educational Research. 72 (2): 230. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.571.4639 . doi:10.3102/00346543072002229. S2CID   145711618.
  9. Henig, Jeffrey R., and Wilbur C. Rich. Mayors in the Middle: Politics, Race, and Mayoral Control of Urban Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2004.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Favro, Tony. "US Mayors are Divided about Merits of Controlling Schools." USA Editor, 2 Feb. 2007.
  11. Nakamura, David (June 12, 2007). "Fenty To Oust Janey Today". The Washington Post .
  12. 1 2 3 Talia Richman, Now empowered to control city school board, Baltimore mayor seeks new applicants, Baltimore Sun (September 21, 2017).
  13. Javier C. Hernandez, Senate Impasse Forces City to Revive Old School Board, in Name, New York Times (July 1, 2009).
  14. Jennifer Medina, N.Y. Senate Renews Mayor’s Power to Run Schools, New York Times (August 6, 2009).
  15. Kate Taylor, Does It Matter Who Runs New York City's Schools?, New York Times (June 23, 2017).
  16. Jesse McKinley & Lisa W. Foderaro, Assembly Approves 2-Year Deal on Mayoral Control of New York City Schools, New York Times (June 28, 2017).
  17. Big Progress, Small Gains: A Decade of Mayoral Control Over D.C. Schools, U.S. News & World Report (October 11, 2017).
  18. LewAllen, Dave (August 3, 2005). "Detroiters Vote for New School Board". WXYZ-TV. Archived from the original on June 21, 2006.
  19. Finn, Chester E. and Lisa Graham Keegan. "Lost at Sea." Education Next 4.3 (2004): 16.
  20. "Arne Duncan: Mayors Should Run Schools". NBC Chicago. Associated Press. 31 March 2009.
  21. "Does Mayoral Control Provide a Governance Structure that is well suited for our Schools?" Coffinseducationcenter.com. Coffins Education Center, n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2011.
  22. 1 2 3 4 Hess, Frederick M. "Assessing the Case for Mayoral Control of Urban Schools," American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Education Outlook, no. 4 (2008): 4.
  23. Gutstein, Eric and Pauline Lipman. "Should Chicago Have an Elected Representative School Board? A Look at the Evidence." University of Illinois at Chicago. Feb 2011.
  24. Moscovitch, Ruth et al. "Governance and urban improvement: Lessons for New Jersey from nine cities." New Brunswick, NJ: The Institute on Educational Law and Policy, Rutgers University, 2010.
  25. Weiss, E.; Long, D. (April 22, 2013). "Market-Oriented Reforms' Rhetoric Trumps Reality". Broader, Bolder Approach to Education. Economic Policy Institute. Archived from the original on May 9, 2013.
  26. Wong, Kenneth K.; Shen, Francis X. "Mayoral Governance and Student Achievement: How Mayor-Led Districts Are Improving School and Student Performance" (PDF). The Center for American Progress. Retrieved 5 May 2015.