Me-too drug

Last updated

The term "me-too drug" or "follow-on drug" refers to a medication that is similar to a pre-existing drug, usually by making minor modifications to the prototype, reflected in slight changes in the profiles of side effects or activity, and used to treat conditions for which drugs already exist. [1] [2] While pharmaceutical companies have justified the development of me-toos as offering incremental improvements in efficacy, side-effects, compliance and cost, critics have questioned the increasing marketing of me-toos, their absorption of research and development resources and their impact on the innovation of new treatments. [3] [4] [5]

Contents

In 1956, Louis S. Goodman, co‐editor of Goodman and Gilman , referred to “the problem of the introduction of ‘me too’ drugs, that is, drugs without signal advantage of any sort”. [1] However, me-too drugs can be novel compounds themselves. [3] [6] They are commonly used and include several beta blockers, antidepressants and stomach acid reducing and cholesterol lowering drugs. [1]

History

Louis Goodman, who coined the phrase "me-too" Louise Goodman Yale.jpg
Louis Goodman, who coined the phrase "me-too"

The term "me‐too drugs" was coined in the 1950s. In 1956, Louis S. Goodman, co‐editor of Goodman and Gilman , referred to “the problem of the introduction of ‘me too’ drugs, that is, drugs without signal advantage of any sort”. [1] Once a new drug class was discovered, other major drug companies made efforts to produce their own similar versions. Pharmacologist Milton Silverman and physician Philip R. Lee noted "the great drug therapy era was marked not only by the introduction of new drugs in great profusion and by the launching of large promotional campaigns but also by the introduction of what are known as 'duplicative' or 'me-too' products". [7]

Between 1960 and 1962, Estes Kefauver, then Senator of Tennessee, led a series of hearings enquiring about the pharmaceutical industry's motive to produce me-too drugs after it was noted that much of their time and resources were spent producing them. Subsequently, the FDA required drug companies to prove their drugs were safe and effective. [7] In 1964, Louis Lasagna described me-too drugs as being “hard to justify putting into man at all, let alone on the market”. [1] Three years later, the term appeared in the Oxford English Dictionary . [1] In the early 1970s, Silverman and Lee reported that there were almost 100 tranquillisers, 130 antihistamines, greater than 270 antibiotics and more than 200 sulfonamides. [7]

In 1994, Desmond Laurence's textbook Clinical Pharmacology referred to me-too as "me-again". [1]

Definition

There is no agreed definition, however, several have been proposed, [1] including:

Biosimilars are compared with other biosimilars and are therefore not me-toos. [8] [9]

Examples

Me-too drugs include diazepam, ranitidine and esketamine. [1]

Beta blockers

The first-in-class β-blocker pronethalol was developed by James Black at ICI Pharmaceuticals. It was followed by propranolol, sotalol, practolol, metoprolol, labetalol, acebutolol and bisoprolol. Successive differences between β-blockers have had a combined cumulative effect and are seen as "innovative". [1]

Benzodiazepines

15 benzodiazepines were marketed in the UK between 1960 and 1982, of which seven were produced by Roche. [1]

Proton pump inhibitors

The proton-pump inhibitor Nexium by AstraZeneca is a me-too which was granted its patent by showing that it was effective for heartburn, not that it was better than its precursor, Prilosec. [10] It was shown to preserve revenues of Prilosec, whose U.S. patent expired in 2001. Considered a new drug by the FDA, Nexium was patented separately, sold for eight times the cost of its generic esomeprazole and advertised as significantly better than its predecessor, a move the company received much criticism for, with a subsequent class action lawsuit filed against them. [11]

H2 antagonists

Both Tagamet's and Zantac's prices increased following the arrival of further me-too drugs Pepcid and Axid. [4] [12]

ACE inhibitors

Several me-toos followed the prototype of the ace inhibitor, captopril, with enalapril being its first me-too. [1] Most were as efficient as each other and had similar adverse effect profiles. [11]

Statins

When Merck's cholesterol-lowering statin Mevacor (lovastatin) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1987, the understanding of the link between cholesterol and heart disease was improving, and the potential market for the drug became significant. Subsequently, several other companies developed similar drugs: Merck developed Zocor (simvastatin) and Crestor (rosuvastatin), Pfizer developed Lipitor (atorvastatin), Bristol-Myers Squibb developed Pravachol (pravastatin), and Novartis developed Lescol (fluvastatin). [13] [14] [15] Others include pitavastatin (Livalo). [1]

Antidepressants

Imipramine was the first-in-class of the tricyclic antidepressants. Amitriptyline, Nortriptyline, Dosulepin and Doxepin are some of the me-toos that followed. [1] Several me-too Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been developed for maintenance treatment in chronic depression. These include Paxil (paroxetine), Celexa (citalopram), Zoloft (sertraline), Lexapro (escitalopram) and Prozac (fluoxetine). [16]

For example, Celexa is a mixture of a left-handed and right-handed version of the same compound ("citalopram"), but only the left-handed version ("es-citalopram") is biologically active. Lexapro, the "me too" drug released several years after Celexa thus extending the patent life, is a purified form of just the left-handed version (the "es" in "es-citalopram"). [17]

Antivirals

Gilead Science's Descovy is a me-too drug of Truvada, a popular Antiretroviral also used to prevent HIV infection in healthy people. Both versions are prodrugs that metabolize into the same active compound. Gilead has been accused in lawsuits of "slow walking" the development of the me-too drug; [18] however, such lawsuits further a market perception the me-too drug is "safer." This drives sales of the more expensive me-too drug when both drugs have virtually identical safety profiles. Similarly, Valtrex, first FDA approved in 2001 to treat persistent herpes outbreaks is a prodrug of acyclovir, first FDA approved in the mid-1980s. Valtrex metabolizes into acyclovir in the liver, [19] but when it first entered the market, it cost many times than the generic.

Debate

In 2005, a report by the International Policy Network defended me-toos, describing their development as "incremental improvements on already existing drugs". [20] The report stated:

... this often represent(s) advances in safety and efficacy, along with providing new formulations and dosing options that significantly increase patient compliance. From an economic standpoint, expanding drug classes represent the possibility of lower drug prices as competition between manufacturers is increased. Additionally, pharmaceutical companies depend on incremental innovations to provide the revenue that will support the development of more risky “block-buster” drugs. Policies aimed at curbing incremental innovation will ultimately lead to a reduction in the overall quality of existing drug classes and may ultimately curb the creation of novel drugs. [20]

This incremental innovation has led to some referring to me-toos as "me-betters". [14] [21]

Many physicians are unaware that me-toos are compared to placebos rather than pre-existing drugs. [22] Me-toos are seen as patentable new drugs and therefore substantial profit makers, where innovative drugs may be more risky to develop. [13] [23] [24]

Statistics

Between 1998 and 2003, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 487 drugs, of which 78 per cent appeared to have similar characteristics to pre-existing marketed drugs. [25]

More than 60% of medicines listed on the World Health Organization's essential list are me‐too drugs. [1]

In September 2019, half of antibiotics under clinical development were “me-too” drugs. At the beginning of 2020, the WHO stated that only two of the 50 antibiotics in clinical development are active against serious drug resistant gram-negative bacteria, and most are not significant "upgrades" of drugs. [26] [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Escitalopram</span> SSRI antidepressant

Escitalopram, sold under the brand names Lexapro and Cipralex, among others, is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. Escitalopram is mainly used to treat major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. It is taken by mouth, available commercially as an oxalate salt exclusively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citalopram</span> SSRI antidepressant

Citalopram, sold under the brand name Celexa among others, is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is used to treat major depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and social phobia. The antidepressant effects may take one to four weeks to occur. It is typically taken orally. In some European countries, it is sometimes given intravenously to initiate treatment, before switching to the oral route of administration for continuation of treatment. It has also been used intravenously in other parts of the world in some other circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Generic drug</span> Pharmaceutical equivalent to a brand-name product

A generic drug is a pharmaceutical drug that contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by chemical patents. Generic drugs are allowed for sale after the patents on the original drugs expire. Because the active chemical substance is the same, the medical profile of generics is equivalent in performance compared to their performance at the time when they were patented drugs. A generic drug has the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) as the original, but it may differ in some characteristics such as the manufacturing process, formulation, excipients, color, taste, and packaging.

Prescription drug list prices in the United States continually are among the highest in the world. The high cost of prescription drugs became a major topic of discussion in the 21st century, leading up to the American health care reform debate of 2009, and received renewed attention in 2015. One major reason for high prescription drug prices in the United States relative to other countries is the inability of government-granted monopolies in the American health care sector to use their bargaining power to negotiate lower prices, and the American payer ends up subsidizing the world's R&D spending on drugs.

An orphan drug is a pharmaceutical agent that is developed to treat certain rare medical conditions. An orphan drug would not be profitable to produce without government assistance, due to the small population of patients affected by the conditions. The conditions that orphan drugs are used to treat are referred to as orphan diseases. The assignment of orphan status to a disease and to drugs developed to treat it is a matter of public policy that depends on the legislation of the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pharmaceutical industry</span> Industry involved with discovery, development, production and marketing of drugs

The pharmaceutical industry is an industry involved in medicine that discovers, develops, produces, and markets pharmaceutical goods for use as drugs that function by being administered to patients using such medications with the goal of curing and/or preventing disease. Pharmaceutical companies may deal in "generic" medications and medical devices without the involvement of intellectual property, in "brand" materials specifically tied to a given company's history, or in both within different contexts. The industry's various subdivisions are all subject to a variety of laws and regulations that govern entire financial processes including the patenting, efficacy testing, safety evaluation, and marketing of these drugs. The global pharmaceuticals market produced treatments worth $1,228.45 billion in 2020, in total, and this showed a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.8% given the results of recent events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aciclovir</span> Antiviral medication used against herpes, chickenpox, and shingles

Aciclovir, also known as acyclovir, is an antiviral medication. It is primarily used for the treatment of herpes simplex virus infections, chickenpox, and shingles. Other uses include prevention of cytomegalovirus infections following transplant and severe complications of Epstein–Barr virus infection. It can be taken by mouth, applied as a cream, or injected.

Etanercept, sold under the brand name Enbrel among others, is a biologic medical product that is used to treat autoimmune diseases by interfering with tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a soluble inflammatory cytokine, by acting as a TNF inhibitor. It has US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to treat rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis and ankylosing spondylitis. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is the "master regulator" of the inflammatory (immune) response in many organ systems. Autoimmune diseases are caused by an overactive immune response. Etanercept has the potential to treat these diseases by inhibiting TNF-alpha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cetuximab</span> Pharmaceutical drug

Cetuximab, sold under the brand name Erbitux, is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor medication used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and head and neck cancer. Cetuximab is a chimeric (mouse/human) monoclonal antibody given by intravenous infusion.

Adalimumab, sold under the brand name Humira and others, is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and monoclonal antibody used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and uveitis. It is administered by subcutaneous injection. It works by inactivating tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα).

A biopharmaceutical, also known as a biological medical product, or biologic, is any pharmaceutical drug product manufactured in, extracted from, or semisynthesized from biological sources. Different from totally synthesized pharmaceuticals, they include vaccines, whole blood, blood components, allergenics, somatic cells, gene therapies, tissues, recombinant therapeutic protein, and living medicines used in cell therapy. Biologics can be composed of sugars, proteins, nucleic acids, or complex combinations of these substances, or may be living cells or tissues. They are isolated from living sources—human, animal, plant, fungal, or microbial. They can be used in both human and animal medicine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drug development</span> Process of bringing a new pharmaceutical drug to the market

Drug development is the process of bringing a new pharmaceutical drug to the market once a lead compound has been identified through the process of drug discovery. It includes preclinical research on microorganisms and animals, filing for regulatory status, such as via the United States Food and Drug Administration for an investigational new drug to initiate clinical trials on humans, and may include the step of obtaining regulatory approval with a new drug application to market the drug. The entire process—from concept through preclinical testing in the laboratory to clinical trial development, including Phase I–III trials—to approved vaccine or drug typically takes more than a decade.

Evergreening is any of various legal, business, and technological strategies by which producers extend the lifetime of their patents that are about to expire in order to retain revenues from them. Often the practice includes taking out new patents, or by buying out or frustrating competitors, for longer periods of time than would normally be permissible under the law. Robin Feldman, a law professor at UC Law SF and a leading researcher in intellectual property and patents, defines evergreening as "artificially extending the life of a patent or other exclusivity by obtaining additional protections to extend the monopoly period."

Medication costs, also known as drug costs are a common health care cost for many people and health care systems. Prescription costs are the costs to the end consumer. Medication costs are influenced by multiple factors such as patents, stakeholder influence, and marketing expenses. A number of countries including Canada, parts of Europe, and Brazil use external reference pricing as a means to compare drug prices and to determine a base price for a particular medication. Other countries use pharmacoeconomics, which looks at the cost/benefit of a product in terms of quality of life, alternative treatments, and cost reduction or avoidance in other parts of the health care system. Structures like the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and to a lesser extent Canada's Common Drug Review evaluate products in this way.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glenmark Pharmaceuticals</span> Indian multinational pharmaceutical company

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited is an Indian multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Mumbai, India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarfaraz K. Niazi</span> Pakistani academic

Sarfaraz Khan Niazi he migrated to Karachi, Pakistan in 1962, and to the United States in 1970. He is an expert in biopharmaceutical manufacturing and has worked in academia, industry, and as an entrepreneur. He has written books in pharmaceutical sciences, biotechnology, consumer healthcare, and poetry. He has translated ghazals of the Urdu poet Ghalib.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act</span> Piece of American regulatory legislation

The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act of 2012 (FDASIA) is a piece of American regulatory legislation signed into law on July 9, 2012. It gives the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to collect user fees from the medical industry to fund reviews of innovator drugs, medical devices, generic drugs and biosimilar biologics. It also creates the breakthrough therapy designation program and extends the priority review voucher program to make eligible rare pediatric diseases. The measure was passed by 96 senators voting for and one voting against.

Pharmaceutical innovations are currently guided by a patent system, the patent system protects the innovator of medicines for a period of time. The patent system does not currently stimulate innovation or pricing that provides access to medicine for those who need it the most, It provides for profitable innovation. As of 2014 about $140 Billion is spent on research and development of pharmaceuticals which produces 25–35 new drugs annually. Technology, which is transforming science, medicine, and research tools has increased the speed at which we can analyze data but we currently still must test the products which is a lengthy process. Differences in the performance of medical care may be due to variation in the introduction and circulation of pharmaceutical innovations.

The cost of drug development is the full cost of bringing a new drug to market from drug discovery through clinical trials to approval. Typically, companies spend tens to hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars on drug development. One element of the complexity is that the much-publicized final numbers often not only include the out-of-pocket expenses for conducting a series of Phase I-III clinical trials, but also the capital costs of the long period during which the company must cover out-of-pocket costs for preclinical drug discovery. Additionally, companies often do not report whether a given figure includes the capitalized cost or comprises only out-of-pocket expenses, or both.

A chiral switch is a chiral drug that has already approved as racemate but has been re-developed as a single enantiomer. The term chiral switching was introduced by Agranat and Caner in 1999 to describe the development of single enantiomers from racemate drugs. For example, levofloxacin is a chiral switch of racemic ofloxacin. The essential principle of a chiral switch is that there is a change in the status of chirality. In general, the term chiral switch is preferred over racemic switch because the switch is usually happening from a racemic drug to the corresponding single enantiomer(s). It is important to understand that chiral switches are treated as a selection invention. A selection invention is an invention that selects a group of new members from a previously known class on the basis of superior properties. To express the pharmacological activities of each of the chiral twins of a racemic drug two technical terms have been coined eutomer and distomer. The member of the chiral twin that has greater physiological activity is referred to as the eutomer and the other one with lesser activity is referred to as distomer. The eutomer/distomer ratio is called the eudisimic ratio and reflects the degree of enantioselectivity of the biological activity.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Aronson, Jeffrey K.; Green, A. Richard (13 May 2020). "Me‐too pharmaceutical products: History, definitions, examples, and relevance to drug shortages and essential medicines lists". British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 86 (11): 2114–2122. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14327 . PMC   7576625 . PMID   32358800.
  2. ↑ Vincent Rajkumar, S. (23 June 2020). "The high cost of prescription drugs: causes and solutions". Blood Cancer Journal. 10 (6): 71. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0338-x . PMC   7311400 . PMID   32576816.
  3. 1 2 Garattini, Silvio (1997). "Are me-too drugs justified?". Journal of Nephrology. 10 (6): 283–94. PMID   9442441. S2CID   7039484.
  4. 1 2 Hollis, Aidan (13 December 2004). "Me-too drugs: is there a problem" (PDF). World Health Organization. S2CID   3142385.
  5. ↑ Mazzucato, Mariana; Li, Henry Lishi; Darzi, Ara (4 March 2020). "Is it time to nationalise the pharmaceutical industry?". BMJ. 368: m769. doi:10.1136/bmj.m769. hdl: 10044/1/86122 . PMID   32132003. S2CID   212416521. ProQuest   2371182316.
  6. ↑ Patterson, Julie A.; Carroll, Norman V. (May 2020). "Should the United States government regulate prescription prices? A critical review". Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 16 (5): 717–723. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.06.010. PMID   31248779. S2CID   195761512.
  7. 1 2 3 Goozner, Merrill (2005). "Me Too!". The $800 Million Pill: The Truth Behind the Cost of New Drugs. University of California Press. pp. 209–230. ISBN   978-0-520-24670-6.
  8. ↑ Gutka, Hiten J.; Yang, Harry; Kakar, Shefali (2018). Biosimilars: Regulatory, Clinical, and Biopharmaceutical Development. Springer. p. 129. ISBN   978-3-319-99679-0.
  9. ↑ Mason, Jonathan (5 October 2013). "Introduction of biosimilars: not to be confused with generics". Prescriber. 24 (19): 7. doi:10.1002/psb.1108. S2CID   56581328.
  10. ↑ Menzel, Paul T. (2012). "Just Access to Health Care and Pharmaceuticals". In Brenkert, George G.; Beauchamp, Tom L. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. OUP USA. pp. 202–232. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307955.003.0008. hdl:10822/1025918. ISBN   978-0-19-991622-1.
  11. 1 2 Hanekamp, Gerd (2007). Business Ethics of Innovation. Springer. p. 44. ISBN   978-3-540-72309-7.
  12. ↑ Jena, Anupam B.; Calfee, John E.; Mansley, Edward C.; Philipson, Tomas J. (2009). "'Me-Too' Innovation in Pharmaceutical Markets". Forum for Health Economics & Policy. 12 (1): 5. doi:10.2202/1558-9544.1138. PMC   5659838 . PMID   29081727.
  13. 1 2 Angell, Marcia (2004). The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It. Random House Publishing Group. p. 80. ISBN   978-1-58836-211-7.
  14. 1 2 Patrick, Graham L. (2013). An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry. OUP Oxford. p. 181. ISBN   978-0-19-969739-7.
  15. ↑ Greene, Jeremy A. (1 October 2010). "'For Me There Is No Substitute'—Authenticity, Uniqueness, and the Lessons of Lipitor". AMA Journal of Ethics. 12 (10): 818–823. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.10.msoc2-1010. PMID   23186743.
  16. ↑ Oldani, Michael (2009). "Understanding the 'Therapeutic Embrace' between Big Pharma and Modern Medicine". Pharmacy in History. 51 (2): 75–86. JSTOR   41112425.
  17. ↑ Burke, William (2002). "Stereoisomers in Psychiatry: The Case of Escitalopram". Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 4 (1): 20–24. doi:10.4088/pcc.v04n0107. PMC   314378 . PMID   15014731.
  18. ↑ "How a Drugmaker Profited by Slow-Walking a Promising H.I.V. Therapy". New York Times. No. July 23, 2023.
  19. ↑ Smith, James (2010). "Pharmacokinetics of acyclovir and its metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid and systemic circulation after administration of high-dose valacyclovir in subjects with normal and impaired renal function". Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 54 (3): 1146–1151. doi:10.1128/AAC.00729-09. PMC   2825963 . PMID   20038622.
  20. 1 2 Wertheimer, Albert I.; Santella, Thomas M. (2005). Pharmacoevolution: the advantages of incremental innovation (PDF). International Policy Network; Working Papers on Intellectual Property, Innovation and Health. ISBN   1-905041-05-5.
  21. ↑ Nefissa Chakroun (2016). "6.4. Transferring patent information by means of imitation". Patents for Development: Improved Patent Information Disclosure and Access for Incremental Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 150. ISBN   978-1-78536-860-8.
  22. ↑ Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee (2005). The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry: Fourth Report of Session 2004-05. The Stationery Office. p. 204. ISBN   978-0-215-02457-2.
  23. ↑ "Memorandum by Professor Patrick Vallance (PI 106)". House of Commons, Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence. Retrieved 2020-07-21.
  24. ↑ Buccafusco, Christopher; Masur, Jonathan S. (31 March 2020). "Drugs, Patents, and Well-Being". Washington University Law Review. SSRN   3565320.
  25. ↑ Angell, M. (7 December 2004). "Excess in the pharmaceutical industry". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 171 (12): 1451–1453. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041594. PMC   534578 . PMID   15583183.
  26. ↑ O'Brien, Michael K.; Chu, Philip (8 July 2020). "A Market Failure for Antimicrobial Resistant Medicines". Applied Clinical Trials Online.
  27. ↑ Price, W. Nicholson (2020). "The Cost of Novelty" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 120 (3): 769–835. JSTOR   26910477. SSRN   3350477.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.