Melitians

"Church of the Martyrs" redirects here. For other uses, see Church of the Martyrs (disambiguation).

"Melitian" redirects here. For the breed of dog, see Maltese dog.

"Melitian schism" redirects here. For the schism in the church of Antioch, see Meletian schism.

The Melitians, ^{[lower-alpha 1]} sometimes called the Church of the Martyrs, ^{[lower-alpha 2]} were an early Christian sect in Egypt. It was founded soon after the end of the Great Persecution (313) by Bishop Melitius of Lycopolis. It survived as a small group into the eighth century. The point on which they broke with the larger church was the same as that of the contemporary Donatists in the province of Africa: the ease with which lapsed Christians were received. The resultant division in the church of Egypt is known as the Melitian Schism, ^{[lower-alpha 3]} to be distinguished from the Meletian Schism later that same century.

Start of the Schism, 306–311

Melitius advocated the open practice of Christianity in the face of persecution and urged Christians not to go into hiding. ^[6] In 305/306, during the Diocletian Persecution, Melitius was imprisoned alongside Patriarch Peter I of Alexandria. ^[7] Both of them were released during a lull in the persecutions, and Peter laid down terms for the readmission of "lapsed" Christians, i.e., those who had abjured the faith under persecution. Melitius found his terms too lax and during the dispute that followed he ordained some of his supporters. Peter excommunicated him. ^[3]

When the persecutions flared up again, Peter was killed (311) and Melitius was condemned to the mines. ^[3] He was released by the Edict of Serdica (311), ^[6] but the persecutions came to a permanent end only with the Edict of Milan in 313. When Melitius returned to Egypt, he founded what he called the Church of the Martyrs with clergy of his own ordination. ^{[3] [8]} The name "Melitians" was at first used only by the sect's opponents, who sought thereby to contrast them (as heretics) with true Christians. It was also used by the imperial chancery. The name eventually lost its negative connotations and was adopted by the sect. ^[9]

Attempts to resolve the schism: Nicaea (325) and Tyre (335)

Peter's successor as patriarch, Achillas, failed in his short pontificate to resolve the growing crisis. ^[8] His successor, Alexander I, who came to power in 313, sought to heal the schism in the Egyptian church. In 325 the Council of Nicaea under the Emperor Constantine I attempted to incorporate the Melitians into the now legal church. The council agreed to grant Melitian priests "full clerical privileges" if they were willing to forswear schism and "acknowledge the authority" of the patriarch of Alexandria. ^[10] It was permitted for Melitian clergy to be elected as bishops and Melitius himself was to remain a bishop with no fixed see. He was not restored to Lycopolis. ^[3] Melitius submitted to the council a list of his bishops and clergy known as the Breviarium Melitii. ^[11] The list shows a Melitian presence along the whole length of Egypt and there is little evidence for the theory that the centre of Melitian strength was in Upper Egypt. ^[12] There were 28 Melitian bishops in 325, ^[6] and several had Coptic names. ^[8]

The period of concord lasted three years. Melitius died in 327, ^{[lower-alpha 4]} having appointed John Archaph as his successor. ^[13] In 328, Athanasius was elected to succeed Alexander I as archbishop of Alexandria. ^[14] However, seven years later, in 335, "the Council of Tyre condemned Athanasius on a number of charges, deposed him from being archbishop of Alexandria, excommunicated him, and forbade him to return to his former see." ^[15] Conflicting accounts exist describing the conflict between Athanasius and the Melitians. Athanasius responded in his famous anti-Arian tracts Apologia contra Arianos and Historia Arianorum by accusing the Melitians of lying and conspiring with Arians to unseat him. ^[7]

In the traditional account, encouraged by Eusebius of Nicomedia, the Melitians went into schism and elected a rival patriarch named Theonas with the support of the Arians. ^[16] But Hanson argues that the Eusebians (the so-called Arians) only made a pact with the Melitians AFTER the Melitians had already but unsuccessfully appealed to the emperor for protection from Athanasius. ^[17]

Athanasius claimed that 'Arians' drummed up false charges to neutralize him as their theological opponent. However, Hanson says, “it seems clear also that Athanasius' first efforts at gangsterism in his diocese had nothing to do with difference of opinion on the subject of the Arian Controversy, but were directed against the Melitians. He had not agreed with the arrangement made about the Melitians at Nicaea. Once he was in the saddle, he determined to suppress them with a strong hand, and was not at all scrupulous about the methods he used.” ^[18]

In several letters, the Melitians accused Athanasius of beating their bishops, even of murdering one, and of desecrating Melitian liturgical vessels. ^{[6] [7]} “Was this more than wild hearsay? Had they any genuine grievances? We might dismiss the accusations against Athanasius retailed by Sozomenus and Epiphanius as the product of sheer partisanship and not worthy of credence, as, for instance, Gwatkin does, and many a church historian before and after him who was willing to take Athanasius' protestations of his innocence at their face value.” ^[19] “But, accidentally or providentially, we have available to us contemporary evidence which we cannot possibly dismiss as invention or exaggeration or propaganda, to decide this point.” ^[20] Hanson continues to explain that evidence.

It is unclear if or to what extent the Melitians' Christology had been influenced by or approximated to Arianism in this period. ^[8] However, Hanson says that the conflict with the Melitians had nothing to do with doctrine. ^[21]

"John Arcaph was thought by Constantine to have overplayed his hand at Tyre, perhaps in reviving the exploded affair of Arsenius. He was banished in consequence." ^[22]

Survival as a monastic movement

The names of the leaders of the sect following John Archaph (who is not mentioned after 335) are not known. ^[8] Athanasius continued to refer to them as an ongoing threat in his writings of the 350s and 360s. He claims in his biography of Anthony the Great that the Melitians claimed the hermit saint as one of their own. ^[12] As a schismatic sect, the Melitians declined in importance by 400, but they did not disappear. They are mentioned in the writings of Cyril of Alexandria (d. 444) and Shenoute (d. c. 465) and persisted into the eighth century (after the Arab conquest of Egypt) as a small monastic sect. ^{[3] [6] [7]}

Numerous papyri have been discovered bearing evidence of a Melitian monasticism flourishing in the Egyptian desert in the fourth century. It is clear that Melitian monks lived in communities, but is not certain if these were tightly structured arrangements like the coenobia of the Pachomians or loose quasi-eremitic groupings like the monasteries of Nitria and Scetis. ^[8] Timothy of Constantinople, in his On the Reception of Heretics written towards 600, says of the Melitians that "they engaged in no [theological] error, but must pronounce their schism anathema" to rejoin the church. ^[23] According to the History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria by John the Deacon, some Melitians were reconciled to the Coptic Patriarchate of Alexandria by the efforts of Bishop Moses of Letopolis late in the reign of Patriarch Michael I (died 767). ^[24]

According to Theodoret (d. c. 460), the Melitians developed unique forms of worship that included hand clapping and music. ^[8] It has been argued that the movement was dominated by Copts (native Egyptian speakers). ^[12] Coptic papyri, the writings of the Pachomians and mentions in the writings of Shenoute lend some weight to this view. ^[8]

Notes

1. This spelling comes from the contemporary Life of Constantine by Eusebius of Caesarea, which uses Μελιτιανοί (Melitianoi) in Greek. It is also attested in Syriac. ^[1] Although the spelling Meletian is common, it correctly describes only the schism of Meletius of Antioch a generation later. ^{[2] [3] [4]}
2. The name "Church of the Martyrs" was chosen by Melitius himself, but his was not the only rigorist sect to use this name in the early church. ^[5]
3. In sources that use the same spelling of Melitian/Meletian for both the schism in Egypt and the one in Antioch, the Egyptian schism may be called the First Meletian Schism. ^[6]
4. Historian Janet Timbie says that the date is unknown, only that he died between 325 and 332. ^[8]

Citations

1. Schwartz 1905, p. 164n.
2. Carroll 1989, p. 1.
3. Cross & Livingstone 2009.
4. McGuckin 2004, pp. 222–223.
5. Carroll 1989, pp. 94, 170.
6. Gregory 1991.
7. Gwynn 2018.
8. Timbie 1991.
9. Hauben 1998, p. 331.
10. Barnes 1981, p. 217.
11. Carroll 1989, pp. 194–195 (Appendix 6).
12. Gwynn 2012.
13. Carroll 1989, p. 115.
14. “Athanasius was indeed elected, but not by an immediate and unanimous acclamation and not without suspicion of sharp practice.” Hanson RPC, The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318-381. 1988, page 249
15. Hanson RPC, The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318-381. 1988, page 261
16. Carroll 1989, p. 117.
17. “Epiphanius goes on to say that the leaders of the Melitians were, after their discomfiture [their failed appeal to the emperor], near the court … and were at that point taken in hand by Eusebius of Nicomedia who promised that he would obtain for them an audience with the Emperor if they would receive and champion Arius, and, on their agreeing, the fusion of the causes of Arius and of Melitius took place.” (Hanson, p250)
18. Hanson RPC, The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318-381. 1988, page 254
19. Hanson RPC, The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318-381. 1988, page 251
20. Hanson RPC, The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318-381. 1988, page 251-2
21. The alliance between the Eusebians and Melitians “gave Athanasius an opportunity of clouding the issue by ascribing all protest against his outrageous conduct to bias towards Arianism, an opportunity of which he strove earnestly to take advantage. But … Athanasius' offence had nothing to do with doctrine.” (Hanson, page 255)
22. RPC Hanson, page 262
23. Migne 1865, cols. 39–40 and n. 34.
24. Mikhail 2014, p. 299 n68.

Bibliography

• Barkman, Heather (2014). "The Church of the Martyrs in Egypt and North Africa: A Comparison of the Melitian and Donatist Schisms". Journal of the Canadian Society for Coptic Studies. 6 (1): 41–58.
• Barnard, L. W. (1973). "Athanasius and the Meletian Schism in Egypt". Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 59: 281–289. doi:10.1177/030751337305900121. S2CID   192269982.
• Barnard, L. W. (1975). "Some Notes on the Meletian Schism in Egypt". Studia Patristica. 12 (1): 399–405.
• Barnes, T. D. (1981). Constantine and Eusebius. Harvard University Press.
• Bell, H. I.; Crum, W. E., eds. (1972) [1924]. Jews and Christians in Egypt: The Jewish Troubles in Alexandria and the Athanasian Controversy. Greenwood.
• Carroll, Scott T. (1989). The Melitian Schism: Coptic Christianity and the Egyptian Church (Ph.D. thesis). Miami University.
• Cross, F. L.; Livingstone, E. A., eds. (2009) [2005]. "Melitian Schisms". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd rev. ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780192802903.
• Davis, Stephen J. (2004). The Early Coptic Papacy: The Egyptian Church and Its Leadership in Late Antiquity. American University in Cairo Press.
• Gregory, Timothy E. (1991). "Meletian Schism in Egypt" . In Kazhdan, Alexander (ed.). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   0-19-504652-8.
• Gwynn, David M. (2007). The Eusebians: The Polemic of Athanasius of Alexandria and the Construction of the 'Arian Controversy'. Oxford University Press.
• Gwynn, David M. (2012). "Meletian Schism". In Roger S. Bagnall; Kai Brodersen; Craige B. Champion; Andrew Erskine; Sabine R. Huebner (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Wiley. pp. 4420–4421. doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah12149. ISBN   9781444338386.
• Gwynn, David M. (2018). "Meletius and Meletians". In Oliver Nicholson (ed.). The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press. pp. 1000–1001.
• Hauben, Hans (1998). "The Melitian 'Church of the Martyrs': Christian Dissenters in Ancient Egypt". In T. Hillard; R. Kearsley; C. Nixon; A. Nobbs (eds.). Ancient History in a Modern University, Vol. 2: Early Christianity, Late Antiquity and Beyond. Eerdmans. pp. 329–349.
• Hauben, Hans (2012). Peter Van Nuffelen (ed.). Studies on the Melitian Schism in Egypt (AD 306–335). Variorum Collected Studies. Ashgate.
• McGuckin, John Anthony (2004). The Westminster Handbook to Patristic Theology. Westminster John Knox Press.
• Migne, Jacques Paul, ed. (1865). "Timotheus Constantinopolitanus Presbyter". Patrologia Graeca . Vol. 86. Paris. I, cols. 12–69.
• Mikhail, Maged S. A. (2014). From Byzantine to Islamic Egypt: Religion, Identity and Politics after the Arab Conquest. I. B. Tauris.
• Schwartz, Édouard (1905). "Zur Geschichte des Athanasius, V". Nachrichten von der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Philologisch-historische Klasse). Weidmannsche Buchhandlung. pp. 164–256.
• Telfer, William (1955). "Meletius of Lycopolis and Episcopal Succession in Egypt". Harvard Theological Review. 48 (4): 227–237. doi:10.1017/S0017816000025220. S2CID   162693650.
• Timbie, Janet (1991). "Melitian Schism". In Aziz Suryal Atiya (ed.). The Coptic Encyclopedia . Vol. 5. New York: Macmillan Publishers. pp. 1584a–1585a.
• Van Nuffelen, Peter (2012). "The Melitian Schism: Development, Sources, and Interpretation". In Peter van Nuffelen (ed.). Studies on the Melitian Schism in Egypt (AD 306–335). Variorum Collected Studies. Ashgate. pp. xi–xxxvi.