Moorov v HM Advocate

Last updated

Moorov v His Majesty's Advocate
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Scotland).svg
Court High Court of Justiciary
Decided18 July 1930
Citation(s)[1930] ScotHC HCJAC_1, 1930 JC 68, 1930 SLT 596
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Lord Justice-General (Lord Clyde), Lord Justice-Clerk (Lord Alness), Lord Ormidale, Lord Anderson, Lord Sands, Lord Blackburn, and Lord Morison
Keywords
admissibility, Similar fact evidence

Moorov v His Majesty's Advocate 1930 JC 68 is a Scots criminal and evidence law case that concerns admissibility of similar fact evidence. [1] The High Court of Justiciary established the Moorov doctrine [2] in its judgment, which is predominantly used in criminal prosecutions involving allegations of rape and sexual abuse. [1] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Contents

The doctrine states that the prosecution of two or more separate offences, each witnessed by only one person, can be grouped together to evidence the accused's pattern of behaviour to the court and the jury. [1] [6]

Facts

Samuel Moorov was a draper and the proprietor of Samuel Moorov & Son on Argyle Street, Glasgow. [1] He was accused of committing seven assaults and nine indecent assaults against his female employees between 1923 and 1930. [7]

This case brought light on the original course of similar fact evidence which was generally regarded as inadmissible in court. It created a "course of conduct" which related from a connection of special circumstances, such as recurring sexual offences, similar to the case itself. The course of conduct is sufficient as it determines the use of corroboration for each victim involved.

Principles of the Moorov doctrine

  1. Series of offences connected closely in "time, character and circumstance and have underlying unity."
  2. Evidence of one witness in a series of two or more separate offences capable of providing corroboration for the evidence of a witness in another case or cases.
  3. Only evidence of the greater charge can corroborate the lesser charge, not vice versa
  4. Not restricted to sexual assaults
  5. The time factor can vary- usually not more than 3 years apart, however it may extend to this period in specific circumstances. [8]
  6. Character of the crime must be the same
  7. Sodomy and rape are not the same crimes. [9] However, as children were involved Moorov applied
  8. Incest and sodomy are not the same crimes. [10]

Application of the doctrine

Key cases where the Moorov doctrine was applied

Yates v HM Advocate, 1977
Gracey v HM Advocate, 1987
Stobo v HM Advocate, 1994
Smith v Lees [12]

It is found that in incidents where intercourse is admitted and distress is proven, distress can corroborate.

McKearney v HM Advocate, 2004
Cullington v HM Advocate, 1999

Carloway Review

"It is acknowledged that the recommendation to remove the requirement for corroboration will attract particular comment and, no doubt, criticism. There may be further consequences of abolition that will need to be worked through, as the criminal justice system is progressively reformed. This is the nature of law in society. But the initial decision, which has to be taken, is whether, of itself, corroboration continues to contribute more than it detracts from a fair, efficient and effective system." [13]

See also

Related Research Articles

Sexual assault is an act in which one intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent, or coerces or physically forces a person to engage in a sexual act against their will. It is a form of sexual violence that includes child sexual abuse, groping, rape, drug facilitated sexual assault, and the torture of the person in a sexual manner.

Some victims of rape or other sexual violence incidents are male. It is estimated that approximately one in six men experienced sexual abuse during childhood. Historically, rape was thought to be, and defined as, a crime committed solely against females. This belief is still held in some parts of the world, but rape of males is now commonly criminalized and has been subject to more discussion than in the past.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jamieson v HM Advocate</span>

Jamieson v HM Advocate is a notable legal case which established a precedent in Scotland which held that a man does not commit rape where he honestly, albeit unreasonably, believes his victim is consenting. This was a criminal case decided by the High Court of Justiciary sitting as the Court of Criminal Appeal. The appeal case was heard before a panel of three judges with the Lord Justice-General as president, with Lord Allanbridge and Lord Cowie. The case is reported at 1994 SLT 537.

Various individuals, courts and the media around the world have raised concerns about the manner in which cases of child sexual abuse are handled when they occur in congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses. An independent 2009 study in Norway was critical of how Jehovah's Witnesses dealt with cases of child sexual abuse but stated there is no indication that the rate of sexual abuse among Jehovah's Witnesses is higher than found in general society. The organization's stated position is that it abhors child sexual abuse.

In criminal law, consent may be used as an excuse and prevent the defendant from incurring liability for what was done.

The precise definitions of and punishments for aggravated sexual assault and aggravated rape vary by country and by legislature within a country.

A rape shield law is a law that limits the ability to introduce evidence about the past sexual activity of a complaint in a sexual assault trial, or that limits cross-examination of complainants about their past sexual behaviour in sexual assault cases. The term also refers to a law that prohibits the publication of the identity of an alleged rape victim.

The legal age of consent for sexual activity varies by jurisdiction across Asia. The specific activity engaged in or the gender of participants can also be relevant factors. Below is a discussion of the various laws dealing with this subject. The highlighted age refers to an age at or above which an individual can engage in unfettered sexual relations with another who is also at or above that age. Other variables, such as homosexual relations or close in age exceptions, may exist, and are noted when relevant.

Rape is a type of sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, under threat or manipulation, by impersonation, or with a person who is incapable of giving valid consent.

The concept of rape, both as an abduction and in the sexual sense, makes its appearance in early religious texts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rape</span> Type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse without consent

Rape is a type of sexual assault involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without their consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority, or against a person who is incapable of giving valid consent, such as one who is unconscious, incapacitated, has an intellectual disability, or is below the legal age of consent. The term rape is sometimes used interchangeably with the term sexual assault.

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent. Although it usually refers to adults engaging in sexual contact with minors under the age of consent, it is a generic term, and very few jurisdictions use the actual term statutory rape in the language of statutes. In statutory rape, overt force or threat is usually not present. Statutory rape laws presume coercion because a minor or mentally disabled adult is legally incapable of giving consent to the act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scottish criminal law</span>

Scots criminal law relies far more heavily on common law than in England and Wales. Scottish criminal law includes offences against the person of murder, culpable homicide, rape and assault, offences against property such as theft and malicious mischief, and public order offences including mobbing and breach of the peace. Scottish criminal law can also be found in the statutes of the UK Parliament with some areas of criminal law, such as misuse of drugs and traffic offences appearing identical on both sides of the Border. Scottish criminal law can also be found in the statute books of the Scottish Parliament such as the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 and Prostitution (Scotland) Act 2007 which only apply to Scotland. In fact, the Scots requirement of corroboration in criminal matters changes the practical prosecution of crimes derived from the same enactment. Corroboration is not required in England or in civil cases in Scotland. Scots law is one of the few legal systems that require corroboration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ages of consent in the United States</span> U.S. law on age of consent to sexual activity

In the United States, each state and territory sets the age of consent either by statute or the common law applies, and there are several federal statutes related to protecting minors from sexual predators. Depending on the jurisdiction, the legal age of consent is between 16 and 18. In some places, civil and criminal laws within the same state conflict with each other.

Rape investigation is the procedure to gather facts about a suspected rape, including forensic identification of a perpetrator, type of rape and other details.

The importance of corroboration is unique to Scots criminal law. A long-standing feature of Scots law, the requirement for corroborating evidence means at least two independent sources of evidence are required in support of each crucial fact before an accused can be convicted of a crime. This means, for example, that an admission of guilt by the accused is insufficient evidence to convict in Scotland, because that evidence needs to be corroborated by another source.

Child sexual abuse laws in India have been enacted as part of the child protection policies of India. The Parliament of India passed the 'Protection of Children Against Sexual Offences Bill (POCSO), 2011' regarding child sexual abuse on 22 May 2012, making it an Act. A guideline was passed by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, India. The rules formulated by the government in accordance with the law had also been notified on the November 2012 and the law had become ready for implementation. There have been many calls for more stringent laws.

Non-consensual condom removal, or "stealthing", is the practice of a person removing a condom during sexual intercourse without consent, when their sex partner has only consented to condom-protected sex. Victims are exposed to potential sexually transmitted diseasess (STDs) such as HIV/AIDS, or unwanted pregnancies. Such behaviour may be therefore regarded as sexual assault or rape, and sometimes as a form of reproductive coercion. As of 2020, stealthing is punishable as a form of sexual violence in some countries, such as Germany and the United Kingdom.

In Islam, human sexuality is governed by Islamic law, also known as Sharia. Accordingly, sexual violation is regarded as a violation of moral and divine law. Islam divides claims of sexual violation into 'divine rights' and 'interpersonal rights' : the former requiring divine punishment and the latter belonging to the more flexible human realm.

Sexual consent plays an important role in laws regarding rape, sexual assault and other forms of sexual violence. In a court of law, whether or not the alleged victim had freely given consent, and whether or not they were deemed to be capable of giving consent, can determine whether the alleged perpetrator is guilty of rape, sexual assault or some other form of sexual misconduct.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Frank Crowe (15 April 2019). "Moorov then and now". The Journal. Law Society of Scotland. 64 (4). Archived from the original on 25 October 2023.
  2. "Judges and juries to hear of accused's record" (PDF). Scottish Law Commission. 23 May 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 June 2023. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  3. "Fife priest Thomas Mullen dismissed over child abuse claims". BBC News . Scotland. 15 May 2014. Archived from the original on 16 May 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  4. "Child abuser Robert Fury has jail term cut from 12 to four years". BBC News . Glasgow. 20 June 2016. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  5. "Rapist jailed in England acquitted of charges in Scotland". BBC News . Highlands and Islands. 24 January 2017. Archived from the original on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  6. 1 2 "Former East Kilbride teacher wins child abuse appeal". BBC News . Glasgow. 10 May 2017. Archived from the original on 16 May 2017. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  7. Moorov v HM Advocate, 1930 JC 68( High Court of Justiciary 18 July 1930), Text .
  8. Dodds v HMA
  9. P v HM Advocate, 1991
  10. HM Advocate v Cox, 1962
  11. Yates v HM Advocate, 1977
  12. Smith v Lees, 1997 JC 73
  13. (para 7.0.5)