Moorov v HM Advocate

Last updated

Moorov v His Majesty's Advocate
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Scotland).svg
Court High Court of Justiciary
Decided18 July 1930
Citation[1930] ScotHC HCJAC_1, 1930 JC 68, 1930 SLT 596
Court membership
Judges sitting Lord Justice-General (Lord Clyde), Lord Justice-Clerk (Lord Alness), Lord Ormidale, Lord Anderson, Lord Sands, Lord Blackburn, and Lord Morison
Keywords
admissibility, Similar fact evidence

Moorov v His Majesty's Advocate 1930 JC 68 is a Scots criminal and evidence law case that concerns admissibility of similar fact evidence. [1] The High Court of Justiciary established the Moorov doctrine [2] in its judgment, which is predominantly used in criminal prosecutions involving allegations of rape and sexual abuse. [1] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Contents

The doctrine states that the prosecution of two or more separate offences, each witnessed by only one person, can be grouped together to evidence the accused's pattern of behaviour to the court and the jury. [1] [6]

Case

Samuel Moorov was a draper and the proprietor of Samuel Moorov & Son on Argyle Street, Glasgow. [1] In 1930, he was accused of committing 21 charges of assault and sexual assault against 19 of his female employees. [7] In most of these instances, the only evidence available was the direct evidence provided by the victim. [7]

For anyone to be convicted, Scots criminal law uniquely requires corroboration, that is, all crucial facts must be supported by at least two independent sources of evidence. [8] Moorov could not be convicted for instances where the only evidence was the testimony by the victim. The prosecutors attempted to introduce "similar fact evidence", arguing that because several victims had testified similar assaults by Moorov, their testimonies could corroborate one another. [9]

At the trial stage, the use of similar fact evidence was upheld and Moorov was convicted of seven assaults and nine indecent assaults against his female employees between 1923 and 1930. [9] [10] The court reasoned that Moorov had shown a certain course of conduct, which was sufficient to be used to corroborate his repeated, similar offences over the course of a short period.

On appeal, the Appeal Court upheld the use of testimonies from victims to corroborate offences against one another, noting that there was sufficient connection between the circumstances. [7]

Moorov doctrine

The Appeal Court's decision in Moorov is recognised as the Moorov doctrine in Scots criminal and evidence law. [7] The doctrine allows the evidence of a witness to one crime to corroborate the evidence of another witness to a second crime. The doctrine applies only if the two crimes are connected in time, character, and circumstance so that they may be considered to be part of a single course of conduct. [11] The two charges must relate to crimes that are of the same character. [12] The period between the two crimes usually cannot be more than three years. However, the doctrine has been used for longer periods. [13]

Although predominantly used in rape and sexual assault cases, [1] the doctrine is not restricted to sexual offences. In 1951, Lord Carmont used the doctrine in a case where the accused had allegedly committed several distinct assaults with a shaving razors. [14] Soon thereafter, in 1952, Joseph McCudden, a former Scots Guard and a baker from Blantyre was charged with two charges of bribing two footballers to "throw a game". He was convicted on trial and on appeal, Lord Justice General Cooper, held that the trial court had correctly used the Moorov doctrine, as the two charges were closely connected. [14]

A court may only apply the evidence from a "greater" charge to corroborate that of a "lesser" charge, and not vice versa. For example, evidence for an indecent exposure charge cannot corroborate a rape charge. But evidence for rape may corroborate indecent exposure. [15]

Carloway Review

"It is acknowledged that the recommendation to remove the requirement for corroboration will attract particular comment and, no doubt, criticism. There may be further consequences of abolition that will need to be worked through, as the criminal justice system is progressively reformed. This is the nature of law in society. But the initial decision, which has to be taken, is whether, of itself, corroboration continues to contribute more than it detracts from a fair, efficient and effective system." [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assault</span> Physical or verbal attack of another person

An assault is the illegal act of causing physical harm or unwanted physical contact to another person, or, in some legal definitions, the threat or attempt to do so. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in criminal prosecution, civil liability, or both. Additionally, assault is a criminal act in which a person intentionally causes fear of physical harm or offensive contact to another person. Assault can be committed with or without a weapon and can range from physical violence to threats of violence. Assault is frequently referred to as an attempt to commit battery, which is the deliberate use of physical force against another person. The deliberate inflicting of fear, apprehension, or terror is another definition of assault that can be found in several legal systems. Depending on the severity of the offense, assault may result in a fine, imprisonment, or even death.

Sexual assault is an act in which one intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent, or coerces or physically forces a person to engage in a sexual act against their will. It is a form of sexual violence that includes child sexual abuse, groping, rape, drug facilitated sexual assault, and the torture of the person in a sexual manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stuart Hall (presenter)</span> English media personality

James Stuart Hall Jr. is an English former media personality and convicted sex offender. He presented regional news programmes for the BBC in North West England in the 1960s and 1970s, while becoming known nationally for presenting the game show It's a Knockout. Hall's later career mainly involved football reporting on BBC Radio. In June 2013, he was convicted of multiple sexual offences against children, effectively ending his media and broadcasting career.

Not proven is a verdict available to a court of law in Scotland. Under Scots law, a criminal trial may end in one of three verdicts, one of conviction ("guilty") and two of acquittal.

In 2004, seven men living on Pitcairn Island faced 55 charges relating to sexual offences against children and young adults. The accused represented a third of the island's male population and included Steve Christian, the mayor. On 24 October, all but one of the defendants were found guilty on at least some of the charges. Another six men living abroad, including Shawn Christian, who later served as mayor of Pitcairn, were tried on 41 charges in a separate trial in Auckland, New Zealand, in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jamieson v HM Advocate</span>

Jamieson v HM Advocate is a notable legal case which established a precedent in Scotland which held that a man does not commit rape where he honestly, albeit unreasonably, believes his victim is consenting. This was a criminal case decided by the High Court of Justiciary sitting as the Court of Criminal Appeal. The appeal case was heard before a panel of three judges with the Lord Justice-General as president, with Lord Allanbridge and Lord Cowie. The case is reported at 1994 SLT 537.

<i>Smart v HM Advocate</i> Scottish law case

Smart v Her Majesty's Advocate is a Scots law case that effectively excludes the common law doctrine of Volenti non fit injuria from Scots criminal law, when concerning assault.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ages of consent in Africa</span>

The age of consent in Africa for sexual activity varies by jurisdiction across the continent, codified in laws which may also stipulate the specific activities that are permitted or the gender of participants for different ages. Other variables may exist, such as close-in-age exemptions.

Rape is a type of sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, under threat or manipulation, by impersonation, or with a person who is incapable of giving valid consent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World's End Murders</span> Crime in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1977

The World's End Murders is the colloquial name given to the murder of two girls, Christine Eadie, 17, and Helen Scott, 17, in Edinburgh, in October 1977. The case is so named because both victims were last seen alive leaving The World's End pub in Edinburgh's Old Town. The only person to stand trial accused of the murders, Angus Robertson Sinclair, was acquitted in 2007 in controversial circumstances. Following the amendment of the law of double jeopardy, which would have prevented his retrial, Sinclair was retried in October 2014 and convicted of both murders on 14 November 2014. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 37 years, the longest sentence by a Scottish court, meaning he would have been 106 years old when he was eligible for a potential release on parole. He died at HM Prison Glenochil aged 73 on 11 March 2019. Coincidentally, he died on the same day the BBC's Crimewatch Roadshow programme profiled the murders.

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent. Although it usually refers to adults engaging in sexual contact with minors under the age of consent, it is a generic term, and very few jurisdictions use the actual term statutory rape in the language of statutes. In statutory rape, overt force or threat is usually not present. Statutory rape laws presume coercion because a minor or mentally disabled adult is legally incapable of giving consent to the act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scottish criminal law</span>

Scots criminal law relies far more heavily on common law than in England and Wales. Scottish criminal law includes offences against the person of murder, culpable homicide, rape and assault, offences against property such as theft and malicious mischief, and public order offences including mobbing and breach of the peace. Scottish criminal law can also be found in the statutes of the UK Parliament with some areas of criminal law, such as misuse of drugs and traffic offences appearing identical on both sides of the Border. Scottish criminal law can also be found in the statute books of the Scottish Parliament such as the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 and Prostitution (Scotland) Act 2007 which only apply to Scotland. In fact, the Scots requirement of corroboration in criminal matters changes the practical prosecution of crimes derived from the same enactment. Corroboration is not required in England or in civil cases in Scotland. Scots law is one of the few legal systems that require corroboration.

<i>R v R</i> English marital rape trial

R v R[1991] UKHL 12 is a decision in which the House of Lords determined that under English criminal law, it is a crime for a husband to rape his wife.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual offences in the United Kingdom</span>

There are a number of sexual offences under the law of England and Wales, the law of Scotland, and the law of Northern Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 is an Act of the Scottish Parliament. It creates a code of sexual offences that is said to be intended to reform that area of the law. The corresponding legislation in England and Wales is the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and in Northern Ireland the Sexual Offences Order 2008.

The importance of corroboration is unique to Scots criminal law. A long-standing feature of Scots law, the requirement for corroborating evidence means at least two independent sources of evidence are required in support of each crucial fact before an accused can be convicted of a crime. This means, for example, that an admission of guilt by the accused is insufficient evidence to convict in Scotland, because that evidence needs to be corroborated by another source.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Yewtree</span> British police investigation against Jimmy Savile

Operation Yewtree was a British police investigation into sexual abuse allegations, predominantly the abuse of children, against the English media personality Jimmy Savile and others. The investigation, led by the Metropolitan Police (Met), started in October 2012. After a period of assessment, it became a full criminal investigation, involving inquiries into living people, notably other celebrities, as well as Savile, who had died the previous year.

After a sexual assault or rape, victims are often subjected to scrutiny and, in some cases, mistreatment. Victims undergo medical examinations and are interviewed by police. If there is a criminal trial, victims suffer a loss of privacy, and their credibility may be challenged. Victims may also become the target of slut-shaming, abuse, social stigmatization, sexual slurs and cyberbullying. These factors, contributing to a rape culture, are among some of the reasons that may contribute up to 80% of all rapes going unreported in the U.S, according to a 2016 study done by the U.S. Department of Justice.

A child sexual abuse scandal involving the abuse of young players at football clubs in the United Kingdom began in mid-November 2016. The revelations began when former professional footballers waived their rights to anonymity and talked publicly about being abused by former coaches and scouts in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. This led to a surge of further allegations, as well as allegations that some clubs had covered them up.

<i>HM Advocate v Salmond</i> Criminal prosecution of Alex Salmond, former First Minister of Scotland

Her Majesty's Advocate v Alexander Elliot Anderson Salmond was the 2020 criminal prosecution of Alex Salmond, the former First Minister of Scotland. Salmond faced 14 charges, mostly of sexual assault. The trial began on 9 March 2020 at the High Court in Edinburgh and concluded on 23 March 2020 with the jury acquitting him of all charges.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Frank Crowe (15 April 2019). "Moorov then and now". The Journal. 64 (4). Law Society of Scotland. Archived from the original on 25 October 2023.
  2. "Judges and juries to hear of accused's record" (PDF). Scottish Law Commission. 23 May 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 June 2023. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  3. "Fife priest Thomas Mullen dismissed over child abuse claims". BBC News . Scotland. 15 May 2014. Archived from the original on 16 May 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  4. "Child abuser Robert Fury has jail term cut from 12 to four years". BBC News . Glasgow. 20 June 2016. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  5. "Rapist jailed in England acquitted of charges in Scotland". BBC News . Highlands and Islands. 24 January 2017. Archived from the original on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  6. 1 2 "Former East Kilbride teacher wins child abuse appeal". BBC News . Glasgow. 10 May 2017. Archived from the original on 16 May 2017. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  7. 1 2 3 4 James Wolffe (15 April 2021). "Session Cases At 200: 'Our predecessors speak to us across the years'". Scottish Legal News . Archived from the original on 3 July 2022. Retrieved 18 July 2024.
  8. "Consultation issued on Scots law after Cadder ruling". BBC News Scotland . 2 October 2011. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Retrieved 18 July 2024.
  9. 1 2 "How a group of 1930s women made legal history in a case which helps today's victims of sexual assault". BBC Scotland . Archived from the original on 11 December 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2024.
  10. Moorov v HM Advocate, 1930 JC 68( High Court of Justiciary 18 July 1930), Text .
  11. "Man jailed for sexually assaulting two women in Perthshire succeeds in having convictions quashed". The Courier . 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 2 December 2021. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
  12. Stephen v HM Advocate, 2006HCJAC78 , para 9( High Court of Justiciary 26 October 2006).
  13. Dodds v HM Advocate, 2002ScotHC96 , para 3( High Court of Justiciary 17 July 2002).
  14. 1 2 Jack Davidson (7 July 1999). "Proving fair play - or foul". The Herald . Archived from the original on 3 July 2023. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
  15. Andrew Lothian (20 August 2007). "Case that makes the heart leap". The Journal. 52 (8). Law Society of Scotland. Archived from the original on 22 July 2024. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
  16. (para 7.0.5)