Municipal deannexation in the United States

Last updated

Deannexation is the removal of an area from the boundaries of a municipality. It is the reverse of annexation, but is not limited to formerly annexed territory: even portions of a municipality's original territory may be deannexed. Deannexation may also apply to other local government entities, such as school districts. [1]

Contents

Other terms for deannexation include disannexation, secession, detachment, [2] disconnection, [3] severance [4] and exclusion. [4] Deannexation for the purpose of creating a new municipality is sometimes called division. [5]

The procedures and requirements for deannexation vary greatly among the states. Most states provide for some sort of deannexation procedure, and a majority of those states also allow residents to petition for deannexation. Many states specifically require some sort of judicial or administrative agency review of deannexation petitions. [6]

Deannexations are much less common than annexations. When they occur, they are typically small-scale and involve individual properties; deannexations of entire neighborhoods are unusual.

Purposes

Deannexation may result in the formation of a new municipal corporation, ceding the affected land to another municipality, or returning it to its unincorporated condition. [7] [8] Land is often deannexed in order to switch it from one municipality to another, or in order to form a new municipality on it. For example, cities sometimes deannex land in order to rationalize strange borders created by past annexation wars. [8] In contrast, large-scale deannexations in which the deannexed land becomes unincorporated are extremely rare. [9]

Portions of cities may attempt to deannex from a city due to political disagreements with city leadership, as with 1990s deannexation campaigns in Staten Island and the San Fernando Valley. [8] A great deal of deannexation research has focused specifically on the San Fernando Valley dispute. [8]

Majority-white cities have sometimes attempted to deannex regions with large minority populations in order to preserve white voters' power. Some grassroots deannexation campaigns have likewise been initiated by majority-white areas, motivated by what Richard G. Hatcher described as "white reaction to black ascendency". [10] African American communities impacted by a racially-motivated annexation may seek relief through deannexation, as occurred when the Brandy Creek neighborhood of Weldon, North Carolina was annexed into Roanoke Rapids for an economic development project. [11]

Only one deannexation has ever been struck down on constitutional grounds: the Alabama legislature's deannexation of majority-Black areas from Tuskegee in 1957 in order to preserve white supremacy in the city government, which the Supreme Court invalidated in Gomillion v. Lightfoot . [12]

Procedures

Deannexations typically involve consultations between the property owners in the area to be deannexed and the municipality. [13] Deannexation also often involves local legislation passed by the state legislature. [13]

From the standpoint of separation of powers, deannexation is a legislative function because it relates to municipal boundaries, which are traditionally reserved to the legislature. [14] However, a few cases have held that courts have a equitable power to deannex land to which no municipal services are provided. [15]

Legislatures often delegate their powers by involving courts in the process, either by providing for deannexation petitions to be brought before a court or by providing for judicial review of deannexation rulings by a municipality. Judicial discretion is, however, typically quite limited. [16] Legislatures may also sometimes delegate the review of deannexation petitions to an administrative agency. [17] They may also delegate the power of deannexation to municipalities directly. [17] In all of these cases, the power to deannex must be exercised in the exact manner prescribed by the legislature or the deannexation is null and void. [18] As of 2017, 36 states provided for some sort of delegated deannexation procedure. [19]

The procedure for such a deannexation most typically involves four steps: first, a request is made for deannexation, either by the city legislature or signed by a required percentage of property owners or residents in the affected area; second, the request is presented to a designated authority, such as a court; third, the authority reviews the request to see if it meets statutory requirements; fourth, the authority grants the requested deannexation unless the request is improper. [6]

Laws governing resident-initiated deannexation are diverse. A 2016 study of 28 states that provide for resident-initiated deannexation found that the required level of support was variously determined by percentages of landowners, voters, or a combination of the two, and ranged from 100% of affected landowners in many states to 5% of all landowners citywide in West Virginia, while in Missouri a petition can be filed by any resident of the affected area. [20] Eleven of the 28 states allowed petitions only when the deannexation would not create a "donut hole" inside an existing municipality. [21] Seven allowed petitions only when the affected area had not received any public improvements, while some additional states allowed petitions only if the affected area had not received public services, or had received inadequate services. [22] Some states limit the right to petition to areas that have not been platted, or that are used for only agricultural purposes. [23] Petitions may be addressed to a court, to the affected municipality itself, or to the people through a referendum. [24] In most cases the referendum is citywide. Ohio uniquely provides for a referendum in which only those qualified voters who live in the affected area may vote; this is limited to proposed deannexations of areas of 1500 acres or greater. [25]

Frequency and effects

Deannexations are uncommon. [26] Large-scale deannexations are even less common, as most deannexations involve only one or a few properties. [27] Census data through 1980 indicated that the average size of a deannexation was 285 acres. [28]

Compared to annexation, the impact of deannexation on municipal boundaries is quite small. A study covering 1950 to 1976 found that deannexations accounted for 1.4% of boundary changes. [28] A study of Texas municipal boundary changes from 2000 to 2010 found that deannexation accounted for only 2.6% of the overall changes in municipal area during the study period. [29]

In general, when land is deannexed from a local government, the debts of the local government do not stay with the land, unless a statute provides otherwise. [5] Bondholders are assumed to have constructive notice that local boundaries can change. [5]

Deannexation can bring both costs and benefits to the deannexed area. For example, for homeowners otherwise inclined to leave a city, deannexation provides the benefits of avoiding the expense of relocation and increased commuting times. [28] For this reason, white residents of school districts with increasing African American enrollment sometimes pursue deannexation from the school district as an alternative to white flight. [1]

By state

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hettinger County, North Dakota</span> County in North Dakota, United States

Hettinger County is a county in the U.S. state of North Dakota. As of the 2020 census, the population was 2,489. Its county seat is Mott.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popular initiative</span> Popular voter petition systems

A popular initiative is a form of direct democracy by which a petition meeting certain hurdles can force a legal procedure on a proposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vermont General Assembly</span> Legislative branch of the state government of Vermont

The Vermont General Assembly is the legislative body of the state of Vermont, in the United States. The Legislature is formally known as the "General Assembly", but the style of "Legislature" is commonly used, including by the body itself. The General Assembly is a bicameral legislature, consisting of the 150-member Vermont House of Representatives and the 30-member Vermont Senate. Members of the House are elected by single and two-member districts. 68 districts choose one member, and 41 choose two, with the term of service being two years. The Senate includes 30 Senators, elected by seven single-member and nine multi-member districts with two or three members each. It is the only state legislative body in the United States in which a third party has had continuous representation and been consecutively elected alongside Democrats and Republicans.

A charter township is a form of local government in the U.S. state of Michigan. While all townships in Michigan are organized governments, a charter township has been granted a charter, which allows it certain rights and responsibilities of home rule that are generally intermediate between those of a city and a village. Unless it is a home-rule village, a village is subject to the authority of any township in which it is located.

A double majority is a voting system which requires a majority of votes according to two separate criteria. The mechanism is usually used to require strong support for any measure considered to be of great importance. Typically in legislative bodies, a double majority requirement exists in the form of a quorum being necessary for legislation to be passed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Local government in the United States</span> Governmental jurisdictions below the level of the state

Most U.S. states and territories have at least two tiers of local government: counties and municipalities. Louisiana uses the term parish and Alaska uses the term borough for what the U.S. Census Bureau terms county equivalents in those states. Civil townships or towns are used as subdivisions of a county in 20 states, mostly in the Northeast and Midwest.

The term paper township refers to a civil township under Ohio law that nominally exists for certain purposes but does not act as a functioning unit of civil government. Such townships usually exist on paper as a legal fiction due to municipal annexation.

Proposition 2½ is a Massachusetts statute that limits property tax assessments and, secondarily, automobile excise tax levies by Massachusetts municipalities. The name of the initiative refers to the 2.5% ceiling on total property taxes annually as well as the 2.5% limit on property tax increases. It was passed by ballot measure, specifically called an initiative petition within Massachusetts state law for any form of referendum voting, in 1980 and went into effect in 1982. The effort to enact the proposition was led by the anti-tax group Citizens for Limited Taxation. It is similar to other "tax revolt" measures passed around the same time in other parts of the United States. This particular proposition followed the movements of states such as California.

A municipal council is the legislative body of a municipality or local government area. Depending on the location and classification of the municipality it may be known as a city council, town council, town board, community council, rural council, village council, or board of aldermen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boroughitis</span> 1890s boom of new boroughs in New Jersey, US

Boroughitis was the creation in the 1890s, usually by referendum, of large numbers of small boroughs in the U.S. state of New Jersey, particularly in Bergen County. Attempts by the New Jersey Legislature to reform local government and school systems led to the breakup of most of Bergen County's townships into small boroughs, which still balkanize the state's political map. This occurred following the development of commuter suburbs in New Jersey, residents of which wanted more government services, whereas the long-time rural population feared the increases in taxation that would result.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chattahoochee Hills, Georgia</span> City in Georgia, United States

Chattahoochee Hills is a city in southern Fulton County, Georgia, United States. It is the incorporated part of a region called "Chattahoochee Hill Country", an area encompassing approximately 60,000 acres (240 km2) southwest of Atlanta, bordered on the northwest side by the Chattahoochee River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Houston</span> Overview of the politics in the U.S. city of Houston, Texas

The politics of Houston in the U.S. state of Texas are complex and constantly shifting in part because the city is one of the fastest growing major cities in the United States and is the largest without zoning laws. Houston was founded in 1836 and incorporated in 1837. The city is the county seat of Harris County. A portion of southwest Houston extends into Fort Bend County and a small portion in the northeast extends into Montgomery County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bull Mountain, Oregon</span> Unincorporated community in the state of Oregon, United States

Bull Mountain is an unincorporated community and census-designated place in Washington County, Oregon, United States. Bull Mountain is located mostly on a hill for which the community is named. It is bordered on the east by Tigard, on the south by King City, and Beaverton lies to the north. The northeastern part of the Bull Mountain hill is now within the Tigard city limits, as the city has steadily annexed portions of the unincorporated region on its boundary. In 2010, the community became a census-designated place with a population of 9,133. Fire protection and EMS services are provided through Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue.

The administrative divisions of Virginia are the areas into which the Commonwealth of Virginia, a U.S. state, is divided for political and administrative purposes. Some are local governments; others are not. However, all local governments are political subdivisions of the state.

Municipal annexation is a process by which a municipality acquires new territory, most commonly by expanding its boundaries into an adjacent unincorporated area. This has been a common response of cities to urbanization in neighboring areas. It may be done because the neighboring urban areas seek municipal services or because a city seeks control over its suburbs or neighboring unincorporated areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Local government in Queensland</span>

Local government in Queensland, Australia, includes the institutions and processes by which towns and districts can manage their own affairs to the extent permitted by the Local Government Act 1993–2007. Queensland is divided into 78 local government areas, which may be called Cities, Towns, Shires, or Regions. Each area has a council that is responsible for providing a range of public services and utilities and derives its income from both rates and charges on resident ratepayers and grants and subsidies from the state and Commonwealth governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Carolina government and politics</span>

South Carolina government and politics covers the three different branches of government, as well as the state constitution, law enforcement agencies, federal representation, state finances, and state taxes. South Carolina is a state in the United States of America and was the eighth admitted to the Union. The state of South Carolina was preceded by the Crown Colony of South Carolina, a constitutional monarchy which was overthrown during the American Revolution. Presently, South Carolina's government is formed as a representative democracy.

The administrative divisions of Ohio are counties, municipalities, townships, special districts, and school districts.

St. George is the newest incorporated city in Louisiana. It was approved in a ballot initiative on October 12, 2019. Upon incorporation, it became the fifth largest city in Louisiana and the second largest in East Baton Rouge Parish with a population of 86,316. The city originated from a previously unincorporated area of East Baton Rouge Parish located southeast of the City of Baton Rouge.

References

  1. 1 2 Evans, Andrea E. (May 2007). "Changing Faces: Suburban School Response to Demographic Change". Education and Urban Society. 39 (3): 340. doi:10.1177/0013124506297961.
  2. ↑ Christensen, Terry; Hogen-Esch, Tom (2006). Local Politics: A Practical Guide to Governing at the Grassroots: A Practical Guide to Governing at the Grassroots (2nd ed.). M.E. Sharpe. p. 95. ISBN   9780765614407.
  3. ↑ Bushnell, Darcy S. (1990). "Deannexation: A Proposed Statute". New Mexico Law Review. 20: 714.
  4. 1 2 Reynolds, Osborne M., Jr. (2019). "§ 12.8 "Disannexation," "De-Annexation," or "Severance"". Local Government Law (5th ed.). West Academic Publishing. p. 241. ISBN   978-1640208025.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. 1 2 3 Reynolds 2019, p. 243.
  6. 1 2 Reynolds 2019, p. 242.
  7. ↑ Smith 2018, pp. 3–4.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Christensen & Hogen-Esch 2006, p. 96.
  9. ↑ The PFM Group (January 2017). "City of Memphis, TN: Deannexation Framework and Analysis" (PDF). Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  10. ↑ Hatcher, Richard G. (November 1969). "The Black Role in Urban Politics". Current History. 57 (339): 288. JSTOR   45312189.
  11. 1 2 Dorosin, Mark (2021). "The Battle of Brandy Creek: How One Black Community Fought Annexation, Tax Revaluation, and Displacement". South Carolina Law Review. 72: 833.
  12. ↑ McCrary, Peyton (2014). "The Interaction of Policy and Law: How the Courts Came to Treat Annexations under the Voting Rights Act". The Journal of Policy History. 26 (4): 429–458. doi:10.1017/S0898030614000219.
  13. 1 2 Smith, Russel M. (2018). "Introduction to Municipal Incorporation in the USA". Municipal Incorporation Activity in the United States. The Urban Book Series. Springer. p. 4. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72188-0_1. ISBN   978-3-319-72188-0.
  14. ↑ Bushnell 1990, p. 715.
  15. ↑ Reynolds 2019, p. 241 n.110.
  16. ↑ Bushnell 1990, p. 719.
  17. 1 2 Bushnell 1990, p. 720.
  18. ↑ Bushnell 1990, pp. 719–720.
  19. ↑ The PFM Group 2017, p. 6.
  20. ↑ Hodge, Elisha D. (2016-08-22). "An Overview of Resident-Initiated Deannexation". Municipal Technical Advisory Service. pp. 5–8. Retrieved 2023-05-27.
  21. ↑ Hodge 2016, p. 13.
  22. ↑ Hodge 2016, p. 14.
  23. ↑ Hodge 2016, p. 15.
  24. ↑ Hodge 2016, p. 24-27.
  25. ↑ Hodge 2016, p. 30.
  26. ↑ Christensen & Hogen-Esch 2006, p. 51.
  27. ↑ Marcal, Leah; Svorny, Shirley (September 2000). "Support for Municipal Detachment: Evidence from a Recent Survey of Los Angeles Voters" (PDF). Urban Affairs Review. 36 (1): 96. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  28. 1 2 3 Garasky, Steven; Haurin, Donald R. (1997). "Tiebout Revisited: Redrawing Jurisdictional Boundaries". Journal of Urban Economics. 42 (3): 367. doi:10.1006/juec.1996.2028.
  29. ↑ Zhang, Pengju; Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong; Chen, Na (2022-06-21). "The impact of home rule on municipal boundary and fiscal expansion: Evidence from Texas". Journal of Regional Science. 62 (5): 1442–1466. doi: 10.1111/jors.12610 .
  30. 1 2 "Detachment From City Government". Local Government Reference Desk. Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. 2018-10-02. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  31. ↑ Hogen-Esch, Tom; Saiz, Martin (November 2001). "An Anatomy of Defeat: Why San Fernando Valley Failed to Secede From Los Angeles". California Policy Issues: 50–51.
  32. ↑ Hogen-Esch & Saiz 2001, p. 47.
  33. ↑ Hogen-Esch & Saiz 2001, p. 41.
  34. ↑ Olson, Peter R. "Annexation In Georgia: Legal And Practical Considerations". Jenkins, Bowen and Walker, P.C. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  35. ↑ "Recent Legislation: Georgia Authorizes the Creation of the City of Eagle's Landing" (PDF). Harvard Law Review. 132: 2410. 2019.
  36. ↑ Stafford, Leon (2018-11-06). "Eagle's Landing secession attempt from Stockbridge defeated by voters". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  37. ↑ "Ind. Code § 36-4-3-17". Casetext. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  38. ↑ "Ind. Code § 36-4-3-18". Casetext. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  39. ↑ "Hatcher's Fight to Keep Suburb in Gary Said 'Racial'". Journal and Courier. Lafayette, Indiana. 1969-03-20. p. 5 – via Newspapers.com.
  40. ↑ "Black Oak's blunder". The Times. Hammond, Indiana. 1987-08-23. p. A-14 – via Newspapers.com.
  41. ↑ Bowean, Lolly (2007-08-27). "Divorcing Gary is hard to do". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  42. ↑ "N.Y. Village Law § 18-1804" . Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  43. ↑ "List of State Annexation Reporting Laws" (PDF). United States Census Bureau. 2022-12-12. p. 33. Retrieved 2023-05-25.
  44. ↑ "Municipal Boundary Changes and Growth Planning in Tennessee" (PDF). Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. November 2013. p. 51. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  45. ↑ McFadden, Robert D. (1994-03-05). "'Home Rule' Factor May Block S.I. Secession". The New York Times. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
  46. ↑ Dorosin 2021, p. 830.
  47. ↑ Bowen, Shannan (September 17, 2008). "Carolina Shores celebrates 10-year split from Calabash". Star-News . Wilmington, North Carolina. Retrieved November 12, 2012.
  48. ↑ Griffin, Kevin (July 29, 2024). "With the fight over, Summerfield developer now 'focused on the future'". News and Record .
  49. ↑ "WY Stat § 15-1-421 (2013)". Wyoming Statutes. Retrieved 2023-05-28– via justia.com.
  50. ↑ "Deannexation: Concerns About Initiation and Effects". Tennessee Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.