Museum fatigue

Last updated
Visitors resting outside of exhibition space at the British Museum Fatigue at the British Museum, 13th July 2011.jpg
Visitors resting outside of exhibition space at the British Museum

Museum fatigue is a state of physical or mental fatigue caused by the experience of exhibits in museums and similar cultural institutions. The collection of phenomena that characterize museum fatigue was first described in 1916, [1] and has since received widespread attention in popular and scientific contexts. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

The first known description of museum fatigue was made by Benjamin Ives Gilman in the January 1916 edition of The Scientific Monthly . [1] Gilman mainly focused on the effects of museum fatigue on how the viewing displays are placed. Gilman went on to say that the way the displays were presented caused museum fatigue. In other later studies, Edward Robinson in 1928 spoke more about museum fatigue, specifically of four museums that showed a lot of characteristics of museum fatigue because of how the displays were placed. Arthur Melton provided more proof for Robinson by observing visitors' interest in the displays decreased as the number of displays increased.

In a more recent study of the phenomenon, Falk, Koran, Dierking, and Dreblow studied museum fatigue at the Florida Museum of Natural History in 1985. While observing visitors they noticed a pattern of high interest in anything in the museum for about 30 minutes and then a decrease in interest. In 1997–1998, Beverly Serrell in her research determined that in less than 20 minutes people became apathetic towards the museum. [5] Museum fatigue has also been applied in zoos to see if they had the same effect. In one study in 1986, Bitgood, Patterson, and Benefeld observed the reptile house of the Birmingham Zoo. While observing they noticed that the pattern was different from museum fatigue. [6]

Factors

In a 2009 issue of Visitor Studies , Bitgood wrote that possible explanatory concepts for museum fatigue include exhaustion, satiation from repeated exposure to similar exhibits, stress, information overload, object competition from the simultaneous presentation of multiple stimuli, limited attention capacity, and the decision-making process. [2] These general causes seem to be supported by other researchers.

Exhaustion

Exhausted visitor at Sagrada Familia Exhausted visitor sagrada familia.jpg
Exhausted visitor at Sagrada Família

Exhaustion or fatigue can be further divided into physical and mental fatigue. Physical fatigue is caused by walking for extended periods of time or attempting to view poorly placed exhibits or labels. [7] This aspect played a significant role in the first description of museum fatigue by Gilman. [6] Mental fatigue comes from a prolonged period of remaining highly attentive to the exhibits. However, the importance of both types of exhaustion in the concept of museum fatigue has been questioned due to the observance of this phenomenon even during shorter visits. [2] [8] Additionally, Bitgood states that since it is in the best interest of the visitors to ensure they experience as little fatigue as possible, they take effective steps to reduce this state. These include not reading long texts, keeping to a designated path, taking breaks and exiting the museum before they become exhausted. [9] [10]

Satiation

Satiation is often cited as an important component of museum fatigue. [2] [11] It occurs when a visitor views a number of monotonous objects after each other and can be observed as a decline in attention directed towards exhibited objects accompanied by a decline in enjoyment. [12] [7] Camarero & Garrido found in 2018 that visitors who follow a self-regulated path seem to achieve satiation later than those who follow an ordered path. [12] These visitors also show greater satisfaction with their visit. [13] [14] Similarly, those who do not have prior expectations of what they will see in the museum also experience delays of satiation.

Object competition

Object competition is characterized by a number of stimuli presented concurrently resulting in a decline in attention. [11] Due to the distinction between concurrent and serial viewing, object competition is clearly separate from museum fatigue. The two are connected via satiation and choice. [2] An explanation proposed by Melton in 1935, dubbed the competition-distraction hypothesis suggests that the stimuli compete with each other for attention and so increased object density leads to decreased attention for separate objects. [2] [8] An alternative explanation centers choice and comes from the attention-value model presented by Bitgood in 2010. This suggests that visitors' attention is guided by their sense of value of different exhibits. Value is given as a ratio of perceived utility (whether an object seems interesting or familiar) and cost (of time and effort), so when presented with multiple stimuli visitors will attend to the ones with higher utility or lower cost. [11] [8]

Limited attention capacity

Limited attention capacity indicates that a visitor has a finite amount of attention available which they have to allocate between the exhibits they attend to. Therefore, as the amount of exhibits already attended to increases the amount of attention is likely to decrease. The attention capacity is also prone to decreases from other sources, such as distractions by loud noises or flashing lights or conversation with other members of the visitor's group. [11] [8]

Decision-making process

The decision-making process of visitors changes as their visit in the museum progresses. They become more discriminatory in their viewing, deciding to attend only to particular exhibits. [14] This factor is likely to be interacting with other factors such as physical fatigue, a decrease in attention capacity or satiation. [12]

Poor design of the museum can also contribute to museum fatigue, mostly due to the enhancement of the above-mentioned factors. [9] If visitors encounter an especially poorly designed museum or exhibit, they will refuse to take in any information from it, presumably to avoid museum fatigue. As can be seen these factors do not act in isolation but are tight-knit and sometimes difficult to tease apart due to the interactions between them. [2] [6]

Effects on learning

Since attention is a predisposition to learning, museum fatigue can have profound effects on the role of museums as educational facilities. [5] [10] Falk and Dierking proposed the Contextual Model of Learning (CML) which suggests the museum experience and the meaning-making process from it occur at the intersection of three contexts:

  1. The Personal Context
  2. The Sociocultural Context
  3. The Physical Context

The Personal Context entails previous experience with museums in general as well as the particular museum, the visitor's personal characteristics, interests, knowledge and motivations for visiting the museum. The Sociocultural Context encapsulates the beliefs, customs and shared thought processes of the visitor's culture as well as those of the person constructing the exhibition and the social interactions that the visitor experiences within the museum. The Physical Context captures the architecture of the building, the objects inside, the design of the exhibition and other sensory inputs. These contexts are not strictly separate but instead interact with each other. [13] [15]

In a 2018 study, Kim, Dillon & Song applied the CLM to results of surveys regarding student learning in science centres and found that pre-existing scientific knowledge and inadequate level of exhibits were some of the most important determinants of museum fatigue in students. Additionally, social factors such as interactions with other visitors and the group with which the student visited the museum also influenced learning. [16]

Mitigators

One way that museums try to combat museum fatigue is by providing adequate seating in the galleries. According to the American Alliance of Museums blog, "Back in 1975, Boston's Museum of Fine Arts started an initiative called 'Please Be Seated,' where the institution commissioned contemporary furniture makers to design gallery seating. The benches were simultaneously works of art and utilitarian objects. Make benches part of the programmatic requirements for new exhibitions, in all types of museums. Design them into the exhibition floor plan, and commit to keeping them there, even when the desire to add more artifacts or content puts them on the chopping block." [17]

Other opportunities for visitors to take breaks, such as museum shops or cafés also help combat physical fatigue. Clear, well-placed labels can help combat both physical and mental fatigue. [5] Variation in the type of objects exhibited and incorporation of interactive experiences have been shown to mitigate the effects of satiation on visitors. [11] Multiple factors of museum fatigue, such as object competition, limited attention capacity or the decision-making process can be alleviated by lower object density and the limitation of distractions, especially in the form of loud noises or flashing lights. [6] [11] A clear arrangement of exhibits which conduces sequential rather than parallel searching in visitors also aids in relieving the unnecessary cognitive demands placed on them. [11] [8] However, enough freedom needs to be left for visitors to select their own path. [12] [13] [14] Handouts or guides seem to act as a mitigator of museum fatigue, although the design of the guide appears to have a significant effect on its effectiveness. If guides prove to be too effortful for visitors, their usage might drop and any of their potential benefits will remain untapped. [10]

Further research

Further research is required in this area in order to be able to effectively distinguish the causes and effects of museum fatigue. [2] With the onset of modern technologies novel ways of studying visitor behavior, such as through phone data or automatic tracking systems, are emerging which could bring us closer to understanding this complex phenomenon. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wishful thinking</span> Formation of beliefs based on what might be pleasing to imagine

Wishful thinking is the formation of beliefs based on what might be pleasing to imagine, rather than on evidence, rationality, or reality. It is a product of resolving conflicts between belief and desire. Methodologies to examine wishful thinking are diverse. Various disciplines and schools of thought examine related mechanisms such as neural circuitry, human cognition and emotion, types of bias, procrastination, motivation, optimism, attention and environment. This concept has been examined as a fallacy. It is related to the concept of wishful seeing.

Habituation is a form of non-associative learning in which an organism’s non-reinforced response to a stimulus decreases after repeated or prolonged presentations of that stimulus. For example, organisms may habituate to repeated sudden loud noises when they learn that these have no consequences.

Content theory is a subset of motivational theories that try to define what motivates people. Content theories of motivation often describe a system of needs that motivate peoples' actions. While process theories of motivation attempt to explain how and why our motivations affect our behaviors, content theories of motivation attempt to define what those motives or needs are. Content theory includes the work of David McClelland, Abraham Maslow and other psychologists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curiosity</span> Quality related to inquisitive thinking

Curiosity is a quality related to inquisitive thinking, such as exploration, investigation, and learning, evident in humans and other animals. Curiosity helps human development, from which derives the process of learning and desire to acquire knowledge and skill.

Inattentional blindness or perceptual blindness occurs when an individual fails to perceive an unexpected stimulus in plain sight, purely as a result of a lack of attention rather than any vision defects or deficits. When it becomes impossible to attend to all the stimuli in a given situation, a temporary "blindness" effect can occur, as individuals fail to see unexpected but often salient objects or stimuli.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-control</span> Aspect of inhibitory control

Self-control is an aspect of inhibitory control, one of the core executive functions. Executive functions are cognitive processes that are necessary for regulating one's behavior in order to achieve specific goals. Defined more independently, self-control is the ability to regulate one's emotions, thoughts, and behavior in the face of temptations and impulses. Thought to be like a muscle, acts of self-control expend a limited resource. In the short term, overuse of self-control leads to the depletion of that resource. However, in the long term, the use of self-control can strengthen and improve the ability to control oneself over time.

Emotional dysregulation is characterized by an inability to flexibly respond to and manage emotional states, resulting in intense and prolonged emotional reactions that deviate from social norms, given the nature of the environmental stimuli encountered. Such reactions not only deviate from accepted social norms but also surpass what is informally deemed appropriate or proportional to the encountered stimuli.

Salience is the property by which some thing stands out. Salient events are an attentional mechanism by which organisms learn and survive; those organisms can focus their limited perceptual and cognitive resources on the pertinent subset of the sensory data available to them.

Attentional bias refers to how a person's perception is affected by selective factors in their attention. Attentional biases may explain an individual's failure to consider alternative possibilities when occupied with an existing train of thought. For example, cigarette smokers have been shown to possess an attentional bias for smoking-related cues around them, due to their brain's altered reward sensitivity. Attentional bias has also been associated with clinically relevant symptoms such as anxiety and depression.

Lawrence W. Barsalou is an American psychologist and a cognitive scientist, currently working at the University of Glasgow.

The self-regulation of emotion or emotion regulation is the ability to respond to the ongoing demands of experience with the range of emotions in a manner that is socially tolerable and sufficiently flexible to permit spontaneous reactions as well as the ability to delay spontaneous reactions as needed. It can also be defined as extrinsic and intrinsic processes responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and modifying emotional reactions. The self-regulation of emotion belongs to the broader set of emotion regulation processes, which includes both the regulation of one's own feelings and the regulation of other people's feelings.

Emotional responsivity is the ability to acknowledge an affective stimuli by exhibiting emotion. It is a sharp change of emotion according to a person's emotional state. Increased emotional responsivity refers to demonstrating more response to a stimulus. Reduced emotional responsivity refers to demonstrating less response to a stimulus. Any response exhibited after exposure to the stimulus, whether it is appropriate or not, would be considered as an emotional response. Although emotional responsivity applies to nonclinical populations, it is more typically associated with individuals with schizophrenia and autism.

Attention restoration theory (ART) asserts that people can concentrate better after spending time in nature, or even looking at scenes of nature. Natural environments abound with "soft fascinations" which a person can reflect upon in "effortless attention", such as clouds moving across the sky, leaves rustling in a breeze or water bubbling over rocks in a stream. Philosophically, nature has long been seen as a source of peace and energy, yet the scientific community started rigorous testing only as recently as the 1990s which has allowed scientific and accurate comments to be made about if nature has a restorative attribute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exhibit design</span> Process of developing an exhibit

Exhibit design is the process of developing an exhibit—from a concept through to a physical, three-dimensional exhibition. It is a continually evolving field, drawing on innovative, creative, and practical solutions to the challenge of developing communicative environments that 'tell a story' in a three-dimensional space.

Somatic symptom disorder, also known as somatoform disorder or somatization disorder, is defined by one or more chronic physical symptoms that coincide with excessive and maladaptive thoughts, emotions, and behaviors connected to those symptoms. The symptoms are not deliberately produced or feigned, and they may or may not coexist with a known medical ailment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual arousal</span> Physiological and psychological changes in preparation for sexual intercourse

Sexual arousal describes the physiological and psychological responses in preparation for sexual intercourse or when exposed to sexual stimuli. A number of physiological responses occur in the body and mind as preparation for sexual intercourse, and continue during intercourse. Male arousal will lead to an erection, and in female arousal, the body's response is engorged sexual tissues such as nipples, clitoris, vaginal walls, and vaginal lubrication.

Emotion perception refers to the capacities and abilities of recognizing and identifying emotions in others, in addition to biological and physiological processes involved. Emotions are typically viewed as having three components: subjective experience, physical changes, and cognitive appraisal; emotion perception is the ability to make accurate decisions about another's subjective experience by interpreting their physical changes through sensory systems responsible for converting these observed changes into mental representations. The ability to perceive emotion is believed to be both innate and subject to environmental influence and is also a critical component in social interactions. How emotion is experienced and interpreted depends on how it is perceived. Likewise, how emotion is perceived is dependent on past experiences and interpretations. Emotion can be accurately perceived in humans. Emotions can be perceived visually, audibly, through smell and also through bodily sensations and this process is believed to be different from the perception of non-emotional material.

Cognitive inhibition refers to the mind's ability to tune out stimuli that are irrelevant to the task/process at hand or to the mind's current state. Additionally, it can be done either in whole or in part, intentionally or otherwise. Cognitive inhibition in particular can be observed in many instances throughout specific areas of cognitive science.

John Howard Falk is Director of the Institute for Learning Innovation and Sea Grant Professor Emeritus of Free-Choice Learning at Oregon State University. He's a leading expert on "free-choice learning," learning guided by a person's needs and interests. At the Smithsonian Institution's Chesapeake Bay Center for Environmental Studies at Edgewater, Maryland, Falk spent over 13 years "studying lawns and how man relates to them." His current research focuses on the community impacts of museums, libraries, zoos, and aquariums; understanding the reasons people utilize free-choice learning settings during their spare time; and helping cultural institutions rethink their educational positioning in the contemporary era.

The Museum Experience is a non-fiction book written by John H. Falk and Lynn D. Dierking. It is considered by many in the museum profession to be amongst the most important books on museum learning.

References

  1. 1 2 Gilman, Benjamin Ives (1916). "Museum Fatigue". The Scientific Monthly . 2 (1): 62–74. Bibcode:1916SciMo...2...62I. JSTOR   6127.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bitgood, Stephen (2009). "Museum Fatigue: A Critical Review". Visitor Studies . 12 (2): 93–111. doi:10.1080/10645570903203406. S2CID   144469592.
  3. ↑ Adams, Stephen (2009). "Ashmolean Museum redesigned to combat 'museum fatigue'". Daily Telegraph . Retrieved 29 May 2017.
  4. ↑ "Enough with the 'Wow!' already! How to avoid museum fatigue". Lonely Planet . Retrieved 29 May 2017.
  5. 1 2 3 Serrell, Beverly (1997). "Paying Attention: The Duration and Allocation of Visitors' Time in Museum Exhibitions". Curator: The Museum Journal. 40 (2): 108–125. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01292.x. ISSN   2151-6952.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Davey, G. (2005). "What is Museum Fatigue?" (PDF). Visitors Studies Today. Vol. 3.
  7. 1 2 Johnston, Robert J. (1998-05-01). "Exogenous Factors and Visitor Behavior: A Regression Analysis of Exhibit Viewing Time". Environment and Behavior. 30 (3): 322–347. doi:10.1177/001391659803000304. ISSN   0013-9165. S2CID   143120882.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Bitgood, Stephen; McKerchar, Todd L.; Dukes, Stephany (2013-07-01). "Looking Back at Melton: Gallery Density and Visitor Attention". Visitor Studies. 16 (2): 217–225. doi:10.1080/10645578.2013.827024. ISSN   1064-5578. S2CID   144721695.
  9. 1 2 Bitgood, Stephen (2009). "When Is "Museum Fatigue" Not Fatigue?". Curator: The Museum Journal. 52 (2): 193–202. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2009.tb00344.x – via ResearchGate.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Lanir, Joel; Kuflik, Tsvi; Sheidin, Julia; Yavin, Nisan; Leiderman, Kate; Segal, Michael (2017-04-01). "Visualizing museum visitors' behavior: Where do they go and what do they do there?". Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 21 (2): 313–326. doi:10.1007/s00779-016-0994-9. ISSN   1617-4917. S2CID   30094537.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bitgood, Stephen (2010). "An Attention-Value Model of Museum Visitors" (PDF). Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education– via Smithsonian Institution.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Antón, Carmen; Camarero, Carmen; Garrido, María-José (2018-11-01). "A journey through the museum: Visit factors that prevent or further visitor satiation". Annals of Tourism Research. 73: 48–61. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2018.08.002. ISSN   0160-7383. S2CID   158198950.
  13. 1 2 3 Falk, John H. (1993). "Assessing the Impact of Exhibit Arrangement on Visitor Behavior and Learning". Curator: The Museum Journal. 36 (2): 133–146. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1993.tb00786.x. ISSN   2151-6952.
  14. 1 2 3 Rounds, Jay (2004). "Strategies for the Curiosity-Driven Museum Visitor". Curator: The Museum Journal. 47 (4): 389–412. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00135.x. ISSN   2151-6952.
  15. ↑ Falk, John H.; Dierking, Lynn D. (2016-06-16). The Museum Experience Revisited. Routledge. ISBN   978-1-315-41784-4.
  16. ↑ Kim, Minchul; Dillon, Justin; Song, Jinwoong (2020-04-01). "The Factors and Features of Museum Fatigue in Science Centres Felt by Korean Students". Research in Science Education. 50 (2): 419–436. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9695-x. hdl: 10871/36015 . ISSN   1573-1898. S2CID   149153323.
  17. ↑ "Where the Seats Have No Name: In Defense of Museum Benches". American Alliance of Museums. 2018-10-19. Retrieved 2020-04-01.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.