Myanmar | |
---|---|
Range | U+1000..U+109F (160 code points) |
Plane | BMP |
Scripts | Myanmar |
Major alphabets | Burmese Mon Karen Kayah Shan Palaung |
Assigned | 160 code points |
Unused | 0 reserved code points |
Unicode version history | |
3.0 (1999) | 78 (+78) |
5.1 (2008) | 156 (+78) |
5.2 (2009) | 160 (+4) |
Unicode documentation | |
Code chart ∣ Web page | |
Note: [1] [2] Range used for Tibetan script prior to Unicode 1.0.1 (see Tibetan (obsolete Unicode block)). |
Myanmar is a Unicode block containing characters for the Burmese, Mon, Shan, Palaung, and the Karen languages of Myanmar, as well as the Aiton and Phake languages of Northeast India. It is also used to write Pali and Sanskrit in Myanmar.
Myanmar [1] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF) | ||||||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
U+100x | က | ခ | ဂ | ဃ | င | စ | ဆ | ဇ | ဈ | ဉ | ည | ဋ | ဌ | ဍ | ဎ | ဏ |
U+101x | တ | ထ | ဒ | ဓ | န | ပ | ဖ | ဗ | ဘ | မ | ယ | ရ | လ | ဝ | သ | ဟ |
U+102x | ဠ | အ | ဢ | ဣ | ဤ | ဥ | ဦ | ဧ | ဨ | ဩ | ဪ | ါ | ာ | ိ | ီ | ု |
U+103x | ူ | ေ | ဲ | ဳ | ဴ | ဵ | ံ | ့ | း | ္ | ် | ျ | ြ | ွ | ှ | ဿ |
U+104x | ၀ | ၁ | ၂ | ၃ | ၄ | ၅ | ၆ | ၇ | ၈ | ၉ | ၊ | ။ | ၌ | ၍ | ၎ | ၏ |
U+105x | ၐ | ၑ | ၒ | ၓ | ၔ | ၕ | ၖ | ၗ | ၘ | ၙ | ၚ | ၛ | ၜ | ၝ | ၞ | ၟ |
U+106x | ၠ | ၡ | ၢ | ၣ | ၤ | ၥ | ၦ | ၧ | ၨ | ၩ | ၪ | ၫ | ၬ | ၭ | ၮ | ၯ |
U+107x | ၰ | ၱ | ၲ | ၳ | ၴ | ၵ | ၶ | ၷ | ၸ | ၹ | ၺ | ၻ | ၼ | ၽ | ၾ | ၿ |
U+108x | ႀ | ႁ | ႂ | ႃ | ႄ | ႅ | ႆ | ႇ | ႈ | ႉ | ႊ | ႋ | ႌ | ႍ | ႎ | ႏ |
U+109x | ႐ | ႑ | ႒ | ႓ | ႔ | ႕ | ႖ | ႗ | ႘ | ႙ | ႚ | ႛ | ႜ | ႝ | ႞ | ႟ |
Notes
|
The block has sixteen variation sequences defined for standardized variants. [3] They use U+FE00 VARIATION SELECTOR-1 (VS01) to denote the dotted letters used for the Khamti, Aiton, and Phake languages. [4] (Note that this is font dependent. For example, the Padauk font supports some of the dotted forms.)
U+ | 1000 | 1002 | 1004 | 1010 | 1011 | 1015 | 1019 | 101A | 101C | 101D | 1022 | 1031 | 1075 | 1078 | 107A | 1080 |
base code point | က | ဂ | င | တ | ထ | ပ | မ | ယ | လ | ဝ | ဢ | ေ | ၵ | ၸ | ၺ | ႀ |
base + VS01 | က︀ | ဂ︀ | င︀ | တ︀ | ထ︀ | ပ︀ | မ︀ | ယ︀ | လ︀ | ဝ︀ | ဢ︀ | ေ︀ | ၵ︀ | ၸ︀ | ၺ︀ | ႀ︀ |
The following Unicode-related documents record the purpose and process of defining specific characters in the Myanmar block:
Version | Final code points [lower-alpha 1] | Count | UTC ID | L2 ID | WG2 ID | Document |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 | U+1000..1021, 1023..1027, 1029..102A, 102C..1032, 1036..1039, 1040..1059 | 78 | N881 | Ross, Hugh McGregor (1993-04-02), Comment on Burmese Script | ||
N1167 | Everson, Michael (1995-03-12), Names of Burmese characters: comment on Unicode Technical Report #1 | |||||
X3L2/96-061 | Everson, Michael (1996-05-28), Proposal for encoding the Burmese script in ISO 10646 | |||||
UTC/1996-027.2 | Greenfield, Steve (1996-07-01), "F. Burmese", UTC #69 Minutes (PART 2) | |||||
L2/97-039 | N1523 | Ross, Hugh McGregor; Everson, Michael (1997-01-22), Proposal for encoding the Burmese script in ISO 10646 | ||||
L2/97-288 | N1603 | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (1997-10-24), "8.13", Unconfirmed Meeting Minutes, WG 2 Meeting # 33, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 20 June – 4 July 1997 | ||||
L2/98-044 | Collins, Lee (1998-02-23), Revised Proposal for Encoding Burmese in Unicode | |||||
L2/98-101 | N1729 | Ad-hoc report on Burmese and Khmer, 1998-03-18 | ||||
L2/98-177 | Text for PDAM registration and consideration ballot for ISO 10646-1 Amendment 26 - Burmese, 1998-05-11 | |||||
N1780 | PDAM 26 - Burmese, 1998-05-11 | |||||
N1826 | Paterson, Bruce (1998-05-11), PDAM26 - Burmese cover sheet | |||||
N1826.1 | Paterson, Bruce (1998-05-11), PDAM26 - Burmese full text | |||||
L2/98-158 | Aliprand, Joan; Winkler, Arnold (1998-05-26), "Burmese", Draft Minutes – UTC #76 & NCITS Subgroup L2 #173 joint meeting, Tredyffrin, Pennsylvania, April 20-22, 1998 | |||||
L2/98-286 | N1703 | Umamaheswaran, V. S.; Ksar, Mike (1998-07-02), "8.18", Unconfirmed Meeting Minutes, WG 2 Meeting #34, Redmond, WA, USA; 1998-03-16--20 | ||||
L2/98-265 | Htut, Zaw (1998-07-24), Response to Burmese Proposal N1729 (Expert Contribution) | |||||
L2/98-281R (pdf, html) | Aliprand, Joan (1998-07-31), "Burmese (IV.E.1)", Unconfirmed Minutes – UTC #77 & NCITS Subgroup L2 # 174 JOINT MEETING, Redmond, WA -- July 29-31, 1998 | |||||
N1836 (html, doc, Ireland, Japan) | Summary of Voting/Table of Replies - Amendment 26 - Burmese, 1998-08-27 | |||||
L2/98-371 | N1883R2 | Whistler, Ken (1998-09-24), Myanmar (Burmese) Ad-Hoc Meeting Report | ||||
L2/98-325 | ISO/IEC 10646-1/FPDAM 26, AMENDMENT 26: Myanmar, 1998-10-23 | |||||
L2/98-342 | Disposition of comments report on SC2 N3106, ISO 10646 Amd. 26: Burmese, 1998-10-23 | |||||
N1912 | Paterson, Bruce; Everson, Michael (1998-10-23), Disposition of Comments - FPDAM26 - Burmese | |||||
N1913 | Paterson, Bruce; Everson, Michael (1998-10-23), Text of FPDAM 26 - Myanmar/Burmese | |||||
L2/99-010 | N1903 (pdf, html, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (1998-12-30), "8.1.7", Minutes of WG 2 meeting 35, London, U.K.; 1998-09-21--25 | ||||
L2/99-036 | Becker, Joe (1999-02-02), Proposal that Myanmar VOWEL SIGN E be Stored in Phonetic Order (i.e. After its Consonant) | |||||
L2/99-129 | Paterson, Bruce (1999-04-14), Text for FDAM ballot ISO/IEC 10646 FDAM #26 - Myanmar | |||||
L2/99-054R | Aliprand, Joan (1999-06-21), "Myanmar Vowel Sign E", Approved Minutes from the UTC/L2 meeting in Palo Alto, February 3-5, 1999 | |||||
L2/99-232 | N2003 | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (1999-08-03), "6.2.9 FPDAM26 - Myanmar (Burmese) script", Minutes of WG 2 meeting 36, Fukuoka, Japan, 1999-03-09--15 | ||||
L2/01-307 | Whistler, Ken (2001-08-06), Serious bug in Khmer, Myanmar combining classes | |||||
L2/01-308 | Hosken, Martin; Whistler, Ken (2001-08-08), Serious bug in Khmer, Myanmar combining classes | |||||
L2/02-283 | Hosken, Martin (2002-07-05), Myanmar Script Canonical Ordering | |||||
L2/06-108 | Moore, Lisa (2006-05-25), "Motion 107-M5", UTC #107 Minutes, Approve glyph changes for U+1039 MYANMAR SIGN VIRAMA and U+104E MYANMAR SYMBOL AFOREMENTIONED. | |||||
N3353 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2007-10-10), "M51.24", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 51 Hanzhou, China; 2007-04-24/27 | |||||
L2/08-192 | Stribley, Keith (2008-05-02), Comments on Myanmar Unicode introduction text | |||||
L2/10-360 | Myint, Tun (2010-09-27), Excerpts from Myanmar Spelling Dictionary | |||||
L2/14-141 | Unicode Standard Announcement Letter, 2014-05-23 | |||||
L2/14-170 | Anderson, Deborah; Whistler, Ken; McGowan, Rick; Pournader, Roozbeh; Iancu, Laurențiu (2014-07-28), "16", Recommendations to UTC #140 August 2014 on Script Proposals | |||||
L2/14-108 | Hosken, Martin; Morey, Stephen (2014-08-05), Proposal to Disunify Khamti Style Letters from Myanmar | |||||
L2/15-257 | Hosken, Martin (2015-11-02), Proposal to Disunify Khamti Letters from Myanmar | |||||
L2/15-320 | Hosken, Martin (2015-11-03), Proposal to Create Variation Sequences for Khamti Characters | |||||
L2/15-254 | Moore, Lisa (2015-11-16), "Consensus 145-C23", UTC #145 Minutes, Accept the 27 variation sequences in document L2/15-320 for Unicode version 9.0. | |||||
5.1 | U+1022, 1075..1099, 109E..109F | 40 | L2/04-198 | N2768R | Oo, Thein; Htut, Thein; Tint, Tun; Htut, Zaw; Tun, Ngwe (2004-05-19), Proposal of Myanmar Script Extensions: Mon, Shan, and Karen (Kayin) | |
N2953 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2006-02-16), "7.4.9", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 47, Sophia Antipolis, France; 2005-09-12/15 | |||||
L2/06-119 | N3080 | Everson, Michael; Hosken, Martin (2006-04-09), Preliminary proposal for encoding Karen, Shan, and Kayah characters | ||||
L2/06-304 | N3143 | Everson, Michael; Hosken, Martin (2006-09-08), Proposal for encoding Myanmar characters for Shan and Palaung in the UCS | ||||
N3153 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2007-02-16), "M49.15", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 49 AIST, Akihabara, Tokyo, Japan; 2006-09-25/29 | |||||
L2/06-324R2 | Moore, Lisa (2006-11-29), "Consensus 109-C7", UTC #109 Minutes | |||||
N3353 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2007-10-10), "M51.1", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 51 Hanzhou, China; 2007-04-24/27 | |||||
L2/07-225 | Moore, Lisa (2007-08-21), "Myanmar for Shan", UTC #112 Minutes | |||||
L2/07-205R2 | N3277R2 | Everson, Michael (2007-08-28), Proposal for encoding additional Myanmar characters for Shan in the UCS | ||||
L2/07-345 | Moore, Lisa (2007-10-25), "Consensus 113-C11", UTC #113 Minutes | |||||
L2/06-170 | Wordingham, Richard (2009-05-07), Shan-Related Issues with N3080: Preliminary proposal for encoding Karen, Shan, and Kayah Characters | |||||
L2/14-170 | Anderson, Deborah; Whistler, Ken; McGowan, Rick; Pournader, Roozbeh; Iancu, Laurențiu (2014-07-28), "16", Recommendations to UTC #140 August 2014 on Script Proposals | |||||
L2/14-108 | Hosken, Martin; Morey, Stephen (2014-08-05), Proposal to Disunify Khamti Style Letters from Myanmar | |||||
L2/15-257 | Hosken, Martin (2015-11-02), Proposal to Disunify Khamti Letters from Myanmar | |||||
L2/15-320 | Hosken, Martin (2015-11-03), Proposal to Create Variation Sequences for Khamti Characters | |||||
L2/15-254 | Moore, Lisa (2015-11-16), "Consensus 145-C23", UTC #145 Minutes, Accept the 27 variation sequences in document L2/15-320 for Unicode version 9.0. | |||||
U+1028, 1033..1034, 105A..1064 | 14 | L2/04-273 | N2827 | Proposal of 4 Myanmar Semivowels, 2004-06-21 | ||
L2/04-328 | Leca, Antoine (2004-08-04), Response to Public Review Issue #37 | |||||
L2/05-216 | N2966 | Letter of Recommendation re Encoding of Myanmar Alphabets in Unicode, 2005-07-28 | ||||
L2/05-178 | Hosken, Martin (2005-07-29), A Sgaw Karen Unicode Proposal; Extending Myanmar to Incorporate Sgaw Karen | |||||
L2/05-184 | Hosken, Martin (2005-08-01), Dissociating Myanmar Medials: A Proposal to Encode Separate Myanmar Medials | |||||
L2/06-029 | Everson, Michael (2006-03-20), Further discussion of Myanmar medials | |||||
L2/06-085 | Kai, Ka'ōnohi (2006-03-20), Myanmar issues re WG2 N3043 (L2/06-077) | |||||
L2/06-092 | Whistler, Ken (2006-03-24), Discussion of AA and TALL AA Disunification for Myanmar | |||||
L2/06-093 | N3061 | Hosken, Martin (2006-03-27), Supporting Discussion for the Encoding of seven additional Myanmar Characters | ||||
L2/06-094 | Tun, Ngwe (2006-03-27), Support for Transcoding to our Myazedi Unicode Clients | |||||
L2/06-130 | Concerns Regarding WG2 N3043R, Myanmar Additions to 10646, 2006-04-06 | |||||
L2/06-078 | N3044 | Everson, Michael; Hosken, Martin (2006-04-08), Proposal for encoding Mon and S'gaw Karen characters in the UCS | ||||
L2/06-118 | N3079 | Response to UTC contribution N3069, "Concerns Regarding WG2 N3043R, Myanmar Additions to 10646", 2006-04-08 | ||||
L2/06-140 | N3099 | Kolehmainen, Erkki I.; Anderson, Deborah; Everson, Michael; Freytag, Asmus; Moore, Lisa; Oo, Thein; Shih-Shyeng, Tseng; Wei, Lin-Mei; Whistler, Ken; Htut, Zaw (2006-04-26), Myanmar Ad Hoc Report | ||||
L2/06-161 | Wordingham, Richard (2006-05-05), Two Issues Relating to N3044: Proposal to encode Mon and S'gaw Karen characters | |||||
L2/06-108 | Moore, Lisa (2006-05-25), "Motion 107-M6", UTC #107 Minutes | |||||
N3103 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2006-08-25), "M48.16", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 48, Mountain View, CA, USA; 2006-04-24/27 | |||||
U+102B, 103A..103F | 7 | L2/02-284 | Hosken, Martin (2002-07-05), Implementing Kinzi | |||
L2/03-109 | Nelson, Paul (2003-03-05), Examples of Burmese | |||||
L2/06-077R | N3043R | Everson, Michael; et al. (2006-03-01), Proposal to encode seven additional Myanmar characters in the UCS | ||||
N3069 | Concerns Regarding WG2 N3043R, Myanmar Additions, 2006-04-06 | |||||
L2/06-117R | N3078R | Proposed additions to ISO/IEC 10646:2003 Amendment 3, 2006-04-12 | ||||
L2/06-213 | Everson, Michael (2006-05-17), Requirements leading to the characters added to the Myanmar script | |||||
L2/06-108 | Moore, Lisa (2006-05-25), "C.13", UTC #107 Minutes | |||||
N3103 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2006-08-25), "M48.15", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 48, Mountain View, CA, USA; 2006-04-24/27 | |||||
L2/08-126 | Muller, Eric (2008-03-18), UTC Letter Ballot: Myanmar in Unicode 5.1 | |||||
L2/08-127 | Muller, Eric (2008-03-18), Results: UTC Letter Ballot: Myanmar in Unicode 5.1 | |||||
U+1035 | 1 | L2/06-249 | N3115 | Everson, Michael; Hosken, Martin (2006-07-24), One additional Myanmar character for Mon for PDAM 3.2 | ||
L2/06-231 | Moore, Lisa (2006-08-17), "C.11", UTC #108 Minutes | |||||
N3153 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2007-02-16), "M49.1a", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 49 AIST, Akihabara, Tokyo, Japan; 2006-09-25/29 | |||||
U+1065..1074 | 16 | L2/06-163 | Wordingham, Richard (2006-05-07), Non-Shan Issues Relating to N3080: Preliminary proposal for encoding Karen, Shan, and Kayah Characters | |||
L2/06-303 | N3142 | Everson, Michael; Hosken, Martin (2006-09-08), Proposal for encoding Myanmar characters for Karen and Kayah in the UCS | ||||
N3153 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2007-02-16), "M49.16", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 49 AIST, Akihabara, Tokyo, Japan; 2006-09-25/29 | |||||
L2/06-324R2 | Moore, Lisa (2006-11-29), "Consensus 109-C6", UTC #109 Minutes | |||||
5.2 | U+109A..109D | 4 | L2/08-145 | N3436 | Everson, Michael (2008-04-14), Ordering and character properties for Myanmar Khamti Shan characters | |
L2/08-181R | N3423R | Hosken, Martin (2008-04-29), Proposal to add Khamti Shan Characters to the Myanmar Blocks | ||||
L2/08-276 | N3492 | Hosken, Martin (2008-08-04), Extended proposal to add Khamti Shan Characters to the Myanmar Blocks [2008.08.04] | ||||
L2/08-318 | N3453 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2008-08-13), "M52.13", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 52 | ||||
L2/08-253R2 | Moore, Lisa (2008-08-19), "Myanmar/Khamti Shan (B15.2, E.4)", UTC #116 Minutes | |||||
L2/08-161R2 | Moore, Lisa (2008-11-05), "Myanmar", UTC #115 Minutes | |||||
L2/08-412 | N3553 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2008-11-05), "M53.04", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 53 | ||||
|
In Unicode 1.0.0, part of the current Myanmar block was used for Tibetan. In Microsoft Windows, collation data referring to the old Tibetan block was retained as late as Windows XP, and removed in Windows 2003. [5]
In Myanmar, devices and software localisation often use Zawgyi fonts rather than Unicode-compliant fonts. [6] These use the same range as the Unicode Myanmar block (0x1000–0x109F), and are even applied to text encoded like UTF-8 (although Zawgyi text does not officially constitute UTF-8), despite only a subset of the code points being interpreted the same way. Zawgyi lacks support for Myanmar-script languages other than Burmese, but heuristic methods exist for detecting the encoding of text which is assumed to be Burmese. [7]
In computing, plain text is a loose term for data that represent only characters of readable material but not its graphical representation nor other objects. It may also include a limited number of "whitespace" characters that affect simple arrangement of text, such as spaces, line breaks, or tabulation characters. Plain text is different from formatted text, where style information is included; from structured text, where structural parts of the document such as paragraphs, sections, and the like are identified; and from binary files in which some portions must be interpreted as binary objects.
Unicode, formally The Unicode Standard, is a text encoding standard maintained by the Unicode Consortium designed to support the use of text in all of the world's writing systems that can be digitized. Version 15.1 of the standard defines 149813 characters and 161 scripts used in various ordinary, literary, academic, and technical contexts.
Web pages authored using HyperText Markup Language (HTML) may contain multilingual text represented with the Unicode universal character set. Key to the relationship between Unicode and HTML is the relationship between the "document character set", which defines the set of characters that may be present in an HTML document and assigns numbers to them, and the "external character encoding", or "charset", used to encode a given document as a sequence of bytes.
UTF-8 is a variable-length character encoding standard used for electronic communication. Defined by the Unicode Standard, the name is derived from Unicode Transformation Format – 8-bit.
UTF-16 (16-bit Unicode Transformation Format) is a character encoding capable of encoding all 1,112,064 valid code points of Unicode (in fact this number of code points is dictated by the design of UTF-16). The encoding is variable-length, as code points are encoded with one or two 16-bit code units. UTF-16 arose from an earlier obsolete fixed-width 16-bit encoding now known as "UCS-2" (for 2-byte Universal Character Set), once it became clear that more than 216 (65,536) code points were needed, including most emoji and important CJK characters such as for personal and place names.
Mojibake is the garbled or gibberish text that is the result of text being decoded using an unintended character encoding. The result is a systematic replacement of symbols with completely unrelated ones, often from a different writing system.
GB 18030 is a Chinese government standard, described as Information Technology — Chinese coded character set and defines the required language and character support necessary for software in China. GB18030 is the registered Internet name for the official character set of the People's Republic of China (PRC) superseding GB2312. As a Unicode Transformation Format, GB18030 supports both simplified and traditional Chinese characters. It is also compatible with legacy encodings including GB/T 2312, CP936, and GBK 1.0.
GB/T 2312-1980 is a key official character set of the People's Republic of China, used for Simplified Chinese characters. GB2312 is the registered internet name for EUC-CN, which is its usual encoded form. GB refers to the Guobiao standards (国家标准), whereas the T suffix denotes a non-mandatory standard.
The Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode (SCSU) is a Unicode Technical Standard for reducing the number of bytes needed to represent Unicode text, especially if that text uses mostly characters from one or a small number of per-language character blocks. It does so by dynamically mapping values in the range 128–255 to offsets within particular blocks of 128 characters. The initial conditions of the encoder mean that existing strings in ASCII and ISO-8859-1 that do not contain C0 control codes other than NULL TAB CR and LF can be treated as SCSU strings. Since most alphabets do reside in blocks of contiguous Unicode codepoints, texts that use small alphabets and either ASCII punctuation or punctuation that fits within the window for the main alphabet can be encoded at one byte per character, most other punctuation can be encoded at 2 bytes per symbol through non-locking shifts. SCSU can also switch to UTF-16 internally to handle non-alphabetic languages.
ISO 15924, Codes for the representation of names of scripts, is an international standard defining codes for writing systems or scripts. Each script is given both a four-letter code and a numeric code.
In Unicode, a Private Use Area (PUA) is a range of code points that, by definition, will not be assigned characters by the Unicode Consortium. Three private use areas are defined: one in the Basic Multilingual Plane, and one each in, and nearly covering, planes 15 and 16. The code points in these areas cannot be considered as standardized characters in Unicode itself. They are intentionally left undefined so that third parties may define their own characters without conflicting with Unicode Consortium assignments. Under the Unicode Stability Policy, the Private Use Areas will remain allocated for that purpose in all future Unicode versions.
Chinese characters may have several variant forms—visually distinct glyphs that represent the same underlying meaning and pronunciation. Variants of a given character are allographs of one another, and many are directly analogous to allographs present in the English alphabet, such as the double-storey ⟨a⟩ and single-storey ⟨ɑ⟩ variants of the letter A, with the latter more commonly appearing in handwriting. Some contexts require usage of specific variants.
The Unicode Consortium and the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 jointly collaborate on the list of the characters in the Universal Coded Character Set. The Universal Coded Character Set, most commonly called the Universal Character Set, is an international standard to map characters, discrete symbols used in natural language, mathematics, music, and other domains, to unique machine-readable data values. By creating this mapping, the UCS enables computer software vendors to interoperate, and transmit—interchange—UCS-encoded text strings from one to another. Because it is a universal map, it can be used to represent multiple languages at the same time. This avoids the confusion of using multiple legacy character encodings, which can result in the same sequence of codes having multiple interpretations depending on the character encoding in use, resulting in mojibake if the wrong one is chosen.
Specials is a short Unicode block of characters allocated at the very end of the Basic Multilingual Plane, at U+FFF0–FFFF. Of these 16 code points, five have been assigned since Unicode 3.0:
The Basic Latin Unicode block, sometimes informally called C0 Controls and Basic Latin, is the first block of the Unicode standard, and the only block which is encoded in one byte in UTF-8. The block contains all the letters and control codes of the ASCII encoding. It ranges from U+0000 to U+007F, contains 128 characters and includes the C0 controls, ASCII punctuation and symbols, ASCII digits, both the uppercase and lowercase of the English alphabet and a control character.
The Phake language or Tai Phake language is a Tai language spoken in the Buri Dihing Valley of Assam, India. It is closely related to the other Southwestern Tai languages in Assam: Aiton, Khamti, Khamyang, and Turung.
Zawgyi font is a predominant typeface used for Burmese language text on websites. It supports the Burmese script using its Myanmar Unicode block following a non-compliant implementation. Prior to 2019, it was the most popular font on Burmese websites.
Myanmar Extended-A is a Unicode block containing Myanmar characters for writing the Khamti Shan and Aiton languages.
A variant form is an alternate glyph for a character, encoded in Unicode through the mechanism of variation sequences: sequences in Unicode that consist of a base character followed by a variation selector character.
Tamil All Character Encoding (TACE16) is a scheme for encoding the Tamil script in the Private Use Area of Unicode, implementing a syllabary-based character model differing from the modified-ISCII model used by Unicode's existing Tamil implementation.