Northwest Immigrant Rights Project

Last updated
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project
AbbreviationNWIRP
TypeImmigrant rights organization
PurposePromoting justice by defending and advancing the rights of immigrants through direct legal services, systemic advocacy, and community education.
Headquarters Seattle, Washington
Location
Region served
Washington state
Website nwirp.org

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP) is a non-profit legal services organization in Washington state. NWIRP's mission is to promote justice by defending and advancing the rights of immigrants through direct legal services, systemic advocacy, and community education. [1]

Contents

History

Founded in 1984, in the context of the sanctuary movement, the project was created to address the legal needs of Central American refugees and others who were able to legalize their status under Amnesty programs. [2] [3] NWIRP has grown significantly in scope and currently serves more than 10,000 low-income immigrants per year from more than 100 countries across Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, Eastern and Western Europe and Africa. [4]

King County Councilmember Jorge L. Barón was director of the organization from 2008 to 2023. [5] [6] Its current director is Malou Chávez. [7]

Offices

NWIRP has four offices in Washington State. The Seattle Office serves immigrant communities in Western Washington. The Granger Office (in the Yakima Valley) and the Wenatchee Office, serve the immigrant communities in Eastern Washington. The Tacoma Office originally focused solely on serving persons detained at the Northwest Detention Center (owned and operated by the GEO Group), but now also provides representation to non-detained immigrant communities in Western Washington. [8] [9]

Areas of practice

NWIRP provides direct representation to individuals who are applying for political asylum, family visas, lawful status under the Violence Against Women Act, and naturalization or citizenship. NWIRP also provides direct representation, defending individuals who are placed in removal proceedings (deportation proceedings). In addition, supported by a grant from the Executive Office for Immigration Review of the U.S. Department of Justice, NWIRP provides legal orientation sessions to all persons detained at the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington, who are placed in removal proceedings. [10] Additionally, NWIRP regularly hosts webinars and trainings for immigrant rights advocates and attorneys. [11]

Impact Litigation

Apart from representing individuals in administrative proceedings, NWIRP also provides direct representation before the federal district courts and the courts of appeals, primarily the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [12] These are generally impact litigation cases, designed to affect large numbers of people and bring about meaningful social change through setting precedents.

In addition, NWIRP has represented clients before the U.S. Supreme Court. For example, NWIRP's legal director, Matt Adams, presented arguments to the Supreme Court in January 2022, arguing on behalf of two certified classes that had prevailed in the district courts and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [13] The district courts and the court of appeals had ordered that the class members be granted bond hearings after being held in immigration detention for six months. The Supreme Court in Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez , 142 S. Ct. 2057 (2022), reversed the Ninth Circuit, and held that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) prohibits lower courts from entering injunctions that "order federal officials to take or to refrain from taking actions to enforce, implement, or otherwise carry out" certain parts of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), including its detention provisions. The decision severely restricts judiciary's ability to require that the executive branch comply with the INA. [14] [15] [16]

NWIRP also joined with former NWIRP attorney Robert Pauw in successfully petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate a Ninth Circuit opinion that had barred federal district courts from reviewing danger determinations in bond hearings. Martinez v. Clark, 144 S.Ct. 1339 (2024).

NWIRP has a long and successful history of successful litigation before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, from which it has obtained over two dozen of published decisions that have shaped the contours of several areas of immigration law. These decisions include: Zhovtonizhko v. Garland, , 69 F.4th 1038 (9th Cir. 2023); Koonwaiyou v. Blinken, 69 F.4th 1004 (9th Cir. 2023); Alfred v. Garland, 64 F.4th 1025 (9th Cir. 2023) (en banc decision overturning a prior NWIRP victory in Alfred v. Garland, 13 F.4th 980 (9th Cir. 2021); Galvez v. Jaddou, 52 F.4th 821 (9th Cir. 2022); Flores Tejada v. Godfrey, 954 F.3d 1245 (9th Cir. 2020) (overturned by Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez, 142 S. Ct. 2057 (2022)); Hernandez-Galand v. Garland, 996 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2021); Reynaga Hernandez v. Skinner, 969 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2020); Khoury v. Asher, 667 F. App'x 966, 967 (9th Cir. 2016) (overturned by Nielsen v. Preap, 139 S. Ct. 954 (2019)); C.J.L.G. v. Barr, 923 F.3d 622 (9th Cir. 2019) (en banc); Lanuza v. Love, 899 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2018); Ramirez v. Brown, 852 F.3d 954, 955 (9th Cir. 2017); Mondaca-Vega v. Lynch, 808 F.3d 413, 416 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc); Duran-Gonzales v. DHS, 702 F.3d 504 (9th Cir. 2013); Chay Ixcot v. Holder, 646 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011); Lopez-Birrueta v. Holder, 633 F.3d 1211(9th Cir. 2011); Cortez-Guillen v. Holder, 623 F.3d 933 (9th Cir. 2010); Bromfield v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2008); Doissaint v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2008); Mandujano-Real v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 585 (9th Cir. 2008); Suazo-Perez v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2008); Hosseini v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2006); Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2005); Perez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 783 (9th Cir. 2004); Garcia-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 840 (9th Cir. 2003); Castro-Cortez v. Ashcroft, 239 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2001).

NWIRP has also been certified as class counsel in over a dozen class actions successfully challenging, inter alia, unlawful immigration detention, deprivation of access to counsel, and wrongful denial of immigration benefits. Among the most notable cases are: Franco-Gonzales v. Holder, 767 F.Supp.2d 1034 (C.D.Cal. 2010), where the court issued injunctive relief requiring appointed counsel at government expense for detained persons in removal proceedings with mental impairment issues (the first case requiring appointed counsel at government expense for persons in immigration proceedings); Roshandel v. Chertoff, 554 F.Supp.2d 1194 (W.D.Wash. 2008), the first certified class in the nation challenging background checks which indefinitely delayed naturalization applications; Nightingale v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigr. Servs., 333 F.R.D. 449 (N.D. Cal. 2019), the district court granted a permanent injunction on behalf of a nationwide class of individuals seeking copies of their immigration files, bringing a claim under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the first time a class was certified bringing a FOIA claim; Mendez Rojas v. Johnson, 305 F. Supp. 3d 1176 (W.D. Wash. 2018), court granted summary judgment in favor of a nationwide class of asylum applicants who were not provided notice that they needed to file their asylum applications within one year of entering the United States; Galvez v. Jaddou, 52 F.4th 821 (9th Cir. 2022), where the Ninth Circuit affirmed a permanent injunction issued on behalf of a class of applicants for Special Immigrant Juvenile status, requiring the agency to complete the applications within 180 days, as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1232(d)(2); Rosario v USCIS, 365 F.Supp.3d 1156 (W.D. WA 2018), the district court granted a permanent injunction on behalf of a nationwide class of asylum applicants, requiring USCIS to issue initial work permits within 30 days as required by the regulations.

In addition, NWIRP has brought litigation on behalf of itself and the clients it served in challenges that ultimately defended the rights of immigrants across the country. Most notably, in Nw. Immigrant Rts. Project v. Sessions, No. C17-716 RAJ, 2017 WL 3189032 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), NWIRP challenged a cease and desist letter issued by EOIR under the Trump administration, that sought to prohibit NWIRP from providing limited legal services to pro se persons in removal proceedings. The district court issued a preliminary injunction, requiring that Defendants permit NWIRP and other nonprofit agencies to provide limited legal services. After discovery, Defendants entered into a settlement with NWIRP that required Defendants to publish a new regulation making clear that it is lawful to provide limited legal services to persons in removal proceedings. Also noteworthy during the Trump administration, in Nw. Immigrant Rts. Project v. United States Citizenship & Immigr. Servs., 496 F. Supp. 3d 31 (D.D.C. 2020), NWIRP and partners successfully challenged a new rule that sought to raise fees imposed on immigrants filing for certain immigration benefits by hundreds of dollars, and also imposed new fees on asylum seekers.

Partners

NWIRP often partners with other immigrant rights organizations in its litigation, most notably the National Immigration Litigation Alliance., [17] the ACLU, and the American Immigration Council.

Golden Door Award

NWIRP previously presented the Golden Door Award to one organization or individual for their outstanding work promoting justice and dignity for immigrants and refugees. Nominees have often furthered the cause of immigrant and refugee rights on a national, state, or local level. Previous award recipients include:

Amicus Award

NWIRP previously presented the Amicus Award to a law firm that has "shown exceptional participation and dedication to the pro bono legal representation of immigrants and refugees." Previous award recipients include:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child Online Protection Act</span> Former U.S. law to protect minors from certain material on the Internet

The Child Online Protection Act (COPA) was a law in the United States of America, passed in 1998 with the declared purpose of restricting access by minors to any material defined as harmful to such minors on the Internet. The law, however, never took effect, as three separate rounds of litigation led to a permanent injunction against the law in 2009.

Student rights are those rights, such as civil, constitutional, contractual and consumer rights, which regulate student rights and freedoms and allow students to make use of their educational investment. These include such things as the right to free speech and association, to due process, equality, autonomy, safety and privacy, and accountability in contracts and advertising, which regulate the treatment of students by teachers and administrators. There is very little scholarship about student rights throughout the world. In general most countries have some kind of student rights enshrined in their laws and proceduralized by their court precedents. Some countries, like Romania, in the European Union, have comprehensive student bills of rights, which outline both rights and how they are to be proceduralized. Most countries, however, like the United States and Canada, do not have a cohesive bill of rights and students must use the courts to determine how rights precedents in one area apply in their own jurisdictions.

Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564 (2002), followed by 542 U.S. 656 (2004), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, ruling that the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) was unconstitutional as a violation of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M. Margaret McKeown</span> American judge (born 1951)

Mary Margaret McKeown is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit based in San Diego. McKeown has served on the Ninth Circuit since her confirmation in 1998.

Perkins Coie LLP is a global law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Founded in 1912, it is recognized as an Am Law 50 firm. It is the largest law firm headquartered in the Pacific Northwest and has 21 offices across the United States, Europe, and Asia. The firm provides corporate, commercial litigation, intellectual property, and regulatory legal advice to a broad range of clients, including prominent technology companies like Google, Microsoft, Intel, Meta, and Amazon. The firm is known for its pro bono work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doe v. Gonzales</span> 2004 US lawsuit

John Doe v. Alberto R. Gonzales was a case in which the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Library Connection, and several then-pseudonymous librarians, challenged Section 2709 of the Patriot Act; it was consolidated on appeal with a separate case, Doe v. Ashcroft.

Prison Legal News (PLN) is a monthly American magazine and online periodical published since May 1990. It primarily reports on criminal justice issues and prison and jail-related civil litigation, mainly in the United States. It is a project of the Human Rights Defense Center (HRDC), a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ira Kurzban</span> American civil rights and immigration lawyer

Ira J. Kurzban is an American civil rights and immigration lawyer. He is the author of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook, published by the American Immigration Council. Kurzban received widespread media coverage during the 1980s for his representation of Haitian immigrants in Miami, and, in the 1990s and more recently, for his representation of the Haitian government and its two-time president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that addressed the detention and release of unaccompanied minors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guantanamo Bay hunger strikes</span> Series of protests by Guantanamo Bay detainees

The Guantanamo Bay Hunger Strikes were a series of prisoner protests at the U.S. detention camp Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. The first hunger strikes began in 2002 when the camp first opened, but the secrecy of the camp's operations prevented news of those strikes from reaching the public. The first widely reported hunger strikes occurred in 2005.

Refugee roulette refers to arbitrariness in the process of refugee status determinations or, as it is called in the United States, asylum adjudication. Recent research suggests that at least in the United States and Canada, the outcome of asylum determinations largely depends upon the identity of the particular adjudicator to whom an application is randomly assigned, and that the resulting disparities in rates of granting asylum are problematic. On the other hand, some commentators state that a good deal of disparity is inevitable and that refugees and their advocates must "learn to live" with "unequal justice". Others report that the amount of disparity diminished after 2008.

Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the plenary power doctrine does not authorize the indefinite detention of immigrants under order of deportation whom no other country will accept. To justify detention of immigrants for a period longer than six months, the government was required to show removal in the foreseeable future or special circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Corn-Revere</span> American lawyer

Robert L. "Bob" Corn-Revere is an American First Amendment lawyer. Corn-Revere is the Chief Counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and was formerly a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in Washington, D.C. He is regularly listed as a leading First Amendment and media law practitioner by The Best Lawyers in America (Woodward/White), SuperLawyers Washington, D.C., and by Chambers USA. Best Lawyers in America named him as Washington, D.C.’s 2017 “Lawyer of the Year” in the areas of First Amendment Law and Litigation – First Amendment. He was again named as Best Lawyers’ “Lawyer of the Year” for First Amendment Law for 2019 and 2021, and in Media Law for 2022. In 2022 he was listed in Washingtonian Magazine's Top Lawyers Hall of Fame for Lifetime Achievement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trademark infringement</span> Violation of trademark rights

Trademark infringement is a violation of the exclusive rights attached to a trademark without the authorization of the trademark owner or any licensees. Infringement may occur when one party, the "infringer", uses a trademark which is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark owned by another party, especially in relation to products or services which are identical or similar to the products or services which the registration covers. An owner of a trademark may commence civil legal proceedings against a party which infringes its registered trademark. In the United States, the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984 criminalized the intentional trade in counterfeit goods and services.

Wolf v. Vidal, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a case that was filed to challenge the Trump Administration's rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Plaintiffs in the case are DACA recipients who argue that the rescission decision is unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment. On February 13, 2018, Judge Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York addressed the question of whether the government offered a legally adequate reason for ending the DACA program. The court found that Defendants did not provide a legally adequate reason for ending the DACA program and that the decision to end DACA was arbitrary and capricious. Defendants have appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Nielsen v. Preap, No. 16-1363, 586 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the detention of legal immigrants with criminal histories. In a 5–4 vote, the Court ruled that the government has the power to detain immigrants at any time that have committed certain crimes that could lead to their deportation, even if those crimes occurred long in the past.

In United States law, a nationwide injunction is injunctive relief in which a court binds the federal government even in its relations with nonparties. In their prototypical form, nationwide injunctions are used to restrict the federal government from enforcing a statute or regulation.

Biden v. Texas, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to administrative law and immigration.

The Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law (CHRCL) is a nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, California. It was founded in 1983 by lawyer Peter Schey with the mission of protecting and furthering the human and civil rights of immigrants, refugees, and other marginalized communities through nationwide class action litigation and activism.

The Orantes-Hernandez injunction is a federal court decision stemming from an initial 1982 class-action lawsuit, Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith, filed by a group of Salvadoran immigrants that had been mistreated while in custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in the United States. This class-action lawsuit was filed against U.S. immigration authorities for violating rights of Salvadorans, specifically in detention centers. The injunction, a legal order to stop certain behaviors, listed several practices that had been taking place in the treatment of detainees, citing them as "prohibited acts". These included misinforming or failing to inform immigrants of their right to apply for political asylum, using coercive tactics to encourage Salvadorans to elect voluntary departure, and denying detainees access to counsel. Colloquially known as the Orantes-Hernandez injunction, these legal proceedings have been both appealed and upheld in court various times since the initial decision in 1982.

References

  1. ↑ "Mission, Vision, Values | Northwest Immigrant Rights". www.nwirp.org. Archived from the original on 2015-09-27.
  2. ↑ "About". NWIRP. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
  3. ↑ "Our Story | NWIRP.org". www.nwirp.org. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  4. ↑ Davila, Florangela (2004-09-17). "Northwest Immigrant Rights Project turns 20". The Seattle Times.
  5. ↑ Gutman, David (January 9, 2024). "Barón, Mosqueda become King County Council's first Latino members". The Seattle Times. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
  6. ↑ Shapiro, Nina (November 14, 2022). "A top WA immigrant rights lawyer, stepping down, lays out 'win-win' strategy". The Seattle Times. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
  7. ↑ "Staff | NWIRP.org". nwirp.org. Retrieved 2024-01-12.
  8. ↑ Turnbull, Lornet (2006-09-30). "More immigrants in detention: Tacoma center getting influx". The Seattle Times.
  9. ↑ http://www.geogroup.com/maps/locationdetails/52 Archived 2015-07-12 at the Wayback Machine accessdate=2015-05-28
  10. ↑ "Services Provided Overview". NWIRP. Archived from the original on 2015-09-28. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
  11. ↑ "Webinars | NWIRP.org". www.nwirp.org. Retrieved 2024-01-12.
  12. ↑ "Impact Litigation | NWIRP.org". nwirp.org. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  13. ↑ "Seattle immigrant rights group headed to the U.S. Supreme Court". KNKX Public Radio. 2022-01-10. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  14. ↑ Sneed, Tierney (2022-06-13). "Supreme Court makes it more difficult to challenge immigration policies in court | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  15. ↑ "Justices reverse lower court rulings that ordered bond hearings for noncitizens in lengthy immigration detention". SCOTUSblog. 2022-06-13. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  16. ↑ Parness, Ayelet (June 27, 2022). "Recent Supreme Court Decisions Erode Migrants' Rights". HIAS. Retrieved January 11, 2024.
  17. ↑ "Press Releases | NWIRP.org". www.nwirp.org. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  18. ↑ Wippel, Teresa (2013-04-29). "Moscoso receives Golden Door Award for efforts on behalf of immigrants". MLTnews.com. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  19. ↑ "Moscoso receives 2013 Golden Door Award – Washington State House Democrats" . Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  20. ↑ "Current News About KSVR-FM". Ksvr.org. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
  21. ↑ "Northwest Immigrant Rights Project Honors Perkins Coie for Pro Bono Efforts". Perkins Coie. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
  22. ↑ "Williams Kastner Named Recipient of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project's 2008 Amicus Reward". Business Wire. 2008.
  23. ↑ "Anita Ramasastry | UW School of Law". Law.washington.edu. 2013-02-05. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
  24. ↑ "Gibbs Houston Pauw - Comprehensive Immigration Advocacy". Ghp-immigration.com. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
  25. ↑ cozen.com
  26. ↑ "Perkins Coie". Perkins Coie. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.