Nymwars

Last updated

Nymwars is a name given to series of conflicts over policies that mandate that all users of certain internet communications platforms identify themselves using their legal names. The term is mostly associated with Google's name policies on Google+ and YouTube. Nymwars is a blend word composed from (pseudo)nym and wars. The name appears to have gained prominence as the hashtag "#nymwars" on Twitter.

Contents

Conflicts regarding Google+ began in July 2011 when the social networking site began enforcing its real-name-only policy by suspending the accounts of users it felt were not following the policy. [1] Pseudonyms, nicknames, and non-standard real names (for example, mononyms or names that include scripts from multiple languages) were suspended. The issue was settled in July 2014 when Google announced that it was ending its real-name-only policy. [2]

A predecessor to the Google+ conflict was Blizzard's RealID which, starting in July 2010, exposes the name on the player's credit card, and is mandatory to use some game features (cross-game chat) and was nearly made mandatory to post on discussion forums. [3] [4] [5]

These issues have existed since the beginning of online identity, and are related to the alleged online disinhibition effect. The resulting discussions have raised many issues regarding naming, cultural sensitivity, public and private identity, privacy, and the role of social media in modern discourse. The debate has been covered widely in the press including Wired , [6] The Atlantic , [7] and The New York Times . [8]

Google

Google Plus was launched in late June 2011. At the time of launch, the site's user content and conduct policy stated, "To help fight spam and prevent fake profiles, use the name your friends, family or co-workers usually call you." [9] Many users signed up using nicknames, handles, stage names, or other names by which they were commonly known, but which did not necessarily match the name on their government-issued ID.

The first suspensions for name-related reasons occurred in July 2011, and included Limor Fried's account which included the name "LadyAda" (by which she is widely known), nerdcore rapper Doctor Popular, and LA Weekly and Los Angeles Times columnist A.V. Flox. [10] Account suspensions over the following weeks included those who were using nicknames, handles, and pseudonyms; those whose legal names were unusual, including mononymous users; and some users who Google mistakenly believed were impersonating famous individuals, such as Facebook employee and Mozilla founder Blake Ross, [11] and actor William Shatner. [12]

Awareness of the issue grew rapidly, via Twitter, Google+ itself, and a variety of media outlets. By early August, the Electronic Frontier Foundation had posted "A Case for Pseudonymity" in response to the issue. [13]

Google initially responded on 25 July when vice president Bradley Horowitz promised improvements to the suspension and enforcement process. [14] On 17 August, Google implemented a "grace period" before suspension, [15] and on 19 August, a "verified account" program for celebrities and high-profile users. [16]

On 19 October 2011, at the Web 2.0 Summit, Google executive Vic Gundotra revealed that Google+ would begin supporting pseudonyms and other types of identity within a few months. [17] However, as of the 16 October 2012 policy documents, Google still required that participants "Use your common first and last name" adding "our Name Policy may not be for everyone at this time." [18]

On 15 July 2014, Google indicated that the real-name policy was being ended, announcing that "Over the years, as Google+ grew and its community became established, we steadily opened up this policy, from allowing +Page owners to use any name of their choosing to letting YouTube users bring their usernames into Google+. Today, we are taking the last step: there are no more restrictions on what name you can use." [19]

Expired Google policy

Google's official support page described their real-names policy, which has since been abandoned:

Google+ makes connecting with people on the web more like connecting with people in the real world. Because of this, it’s important to use your common name so that the people you want to connect with can find you. Your common name is the name your friends, family or co-workers usually call you. For example, if your legal name is Charles Jones Jr. but you normally use Chuck Jones or Junior Jones, any of these would be acceptable.

— Google+ Naming Policy [20]

Google offers support and assistance to anyone whose profile has been suspended, including an appeal process, and a referral to their Content Policy. If an account is suspended, users will not be able to access Google services that require active profiles, such as Buzz, Reader, and Picasa. They will, however, be able to access other Google services such as Gmail.

Google suggested that their naming policy may not have been for everyone, and recommended if a user chooses not to comply, to make a copy of their Google+ data, and leave. [20]

Google's previous stance

A Google support worker has stated: [21]

Google Profiles is a product that works best in the identified state. This way you can be certain you’re connecting with the right person, and others will have confidence knowing that there is someone real behind the profile they’re checking out. For this reason, Google Profiles requires you to use the name that you commonly go by in daily life.

In August 2011, Google CEO Eric Schmidt was quoted as stating that Google+ was intended as an identity management service more than as a social network, and that the use of real names would be necessary for other planned Google products based on this service. He also asserted that "the Internet will work better if people know that you're a real person rather than a fake person". [22]

Google vice president Bradley Horowitz (in a Google+ post on 24 January 2012) announced that Google is updating its policy "to broaden support for established pseudonyms". [23] However, the updated policy has been criticized for being too vague concerning what is an "established" pseudonym, [24] and insufficiently flexible to protect online privacy. [25]

Criticism

A number of high-profile commentators have publicly criticized Google's policies, including technologists Violet Blue, [26] Jamie Zawinski, [27] Kevin Marks, [28] and Robert Scoble [29] and organisations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation. [13]

Criticisms have been wide-ranging, for example:

Facebook

Facebook has always had a "real name" policy [36] but enforcement has traditionally been sporadic and usually dependent on reports by users.

In November 2011, Facebook suspended Salman Rushdie's account, and then reinstated it under his little-used first name Ahmed, before backing down and restoring it to his preferred name. [37] [38]

In the fall of 2014, Facebook began requiring drag performers to change their Facebook identities to their legal names, notably including performer Sister Roma. [39] This is reported to be the work of a single person systematically reporting them. [40]

U.S. Department of Justice

In November 2011 the United States Department of Justice said that it wants to retain the ability under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute people who provide false information online with the intent to harm others. This statement, coming as it did shortly after the Google+ and Facebook actions, raised fears that web users could face criminal prosecution for using pseudonyms. The Justice Department said it would use that power only in select cases, such as a case in 2011 where it prosecuted a woman who used a MySpace account under a fake name to bully a 13-year-old girl who eventually committed suicide. [38]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gmail</span> Email service provided by Google

Gmail is the email service provided by Google. As of 2019, it had 1.5 billion active users worldwide, making it the largest email service in the world. It also provides a webmail interface, accessible through a web browser, and is also accessible through the official mobile application. Google also supports the use of third-party email clients via the POP and IMAP protocols.

Internet privacy involves the right or mandate of personal privacy concerning the storage, re-purposing, provision to third parties, and display of information pertaining to oneself via the Internet. Internet privacy is a subset of data privacy. Privacy concerns have been articulated from the beginnings of large-scale computer sharing and especially relate to mass surveillance.

Internet identity (IID), also online identity, online personality, online persona or internet persona, is a social identity that an Internet user establishes in online communities and websites. It may also be an actively constructed presentation of oneself. Although some people choose to use their real names online, some Internet users prefer to be anonymous, identifying themselves by means of pseudonyms, which reveal varying amounts of personally identifiable information. An online identity may even be determined by a user's relationship to a certain social group they are a part of online. Some can be deceptive about their identity.

A Google Account is a user account that is required for access, authentication and authorization to certain online Google services. It is also often used as single sign-on for third party services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook</span> Social-networking service owned by Meta Platforms

Facebook is a social media and social networking service owned by American technology conglomerate Meta. Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with four other Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes, its name derives from the face book directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities. Since 2006, Facebook allows everyone to register from 13 years old, except in the case of a handful of nations, where the age limit is 14 years. As of December 2022, Facebook claimed almost 3 billion monthly active users. As of October 2023, Facebook ranked as the third-most-visited website in the world, with 22.56% of its traffic coming from the United States. It was the most downloaded mobile app of the 2010s.

Facebook has been the subject of criticism and legal action since it was founded in 2004. Criticisms include the outsize influence Facebook has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well as Facebook's influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. Notable issues include Internet privacy, such as use of a widespread "like" button on third-party websites tracking users, possible indefinite records of user information, automatic facial recognition software, and its role in the workplace, including employer-employee account disclosure. The use of Facebook can have negative psychological and physiological effects that include feelings of sexual jealousy, stress, lack of attention, and social media addiction that in some cases is comparable to drug addiction.

A recent extension to the cultural relationship with death is the increasing number of people who die having created a large amount of digital content, such as social media profiles, that will remain after death. This may result in concern and confusion, because of automated features of dormant accounts, uncertainty of the deceased's preferences that profiles be deleted or left as a memorial, and whether information that may violate the deceased's privacy should be made accessible to family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diaspora (social network)</span> Nonprofit, user-owned, distributed social network

Diaspora is a nonprofit, user-owned, distributed social network. It consists of a group of independently owned nodes which interoperate to form the network. The social network is not owned by any one person or entity, keeping it from being subject to corporate take-overs or advertising. According to its developer, "our distributed design means no big corporation will ever control Diaspora."

Since the arrival of early social networking sites in the early 2000s, online social networking platforms have expanded exponentially, with the biggest names in social media in the mid-2010s being Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Snapchat. The massive influx of personal information that has become available online and stored in the cloud has put user privacy at the forefront of discussion regarding the database's ability to safely store such personal information. The extent to which users and social media platform administrators can access user profiles has become a new topic of ethical consideration, and the legality, awareness, and boundaries of subsequent privacy violations are critical concerns in advance of the technological age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google+</span> Defunct social network by Google

Google+ was a social network that was owned and operated by Google until it ceased operations in 2019. The network was launched on June 28, 2011, in an attempt to challenge other social networks, linking other Google products like Google Drive, Blogger and YouTube. The service, Google's fourth foray into social networking, experienced strong growth in its initial years, although usage statistics varied, depending on how the service was defined. Three Google executives oversaw the service, which underwent substantial changes that led to a redesign in November 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brand page</span> Online social networking parlance

A brand page, in online social networking parlance, is a profile on a social networking website which is considered distinct from an actual user profile in that it is created and managed by at least one other registered user as a representation of a non-personal online identity. This feature is most used to represent the brands of organizations associated with, properties owned by, or general interests favored by a user of the hosting network.

Social login is a form of single sign-on using existing information from a social networking service such as Facebook, Twitter or Google, to login to a third party website instead of creating a new login account specifically for that website. It is designed to simplify logins for end users as well as provide more reliable demographic information to web developers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">User profile</span> Data about an individual user

A user profile is a collection of settings and information associated with a user. It contains critical information that is used to identify an individual, such as their name, age, portrait photograph and individual characteristics such as knowledge or expertise. User profiles are most commonly present on social media websites such as Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn; and serve as voluntary digital identity of an individual, highlighting their key features and traits. In personal computing and operating systems, user profiles serve to categorise files, settings, and documents by individual user environments, known as ‘accounts’, allowing the operating system to be more friendly and catered to the user. Physical user profiles serve as identity documents such as passports, driving licenses and legal documents that are used to identify an individual under the legal system.

A real-name system is a system in which users can register an account on a blog, website or bulletin board system using their legal name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook real-name policy controversy</span> Controversy over social networking site Facebooks real-name system

The Facebook real-name policy controversy is a controversy over social networking site Facebook's real-name system, which requires that a person use their legal name when they register an account and configure their user profile. The controversy stems from claims by some users that they are being penalized by Facebook for using their real names, and have suffered adverse consequences as a result. For example, Facebook's naming policies prohibit names that Facebook judges to have too many words, too many capital letters, or first names that consist of initials. Facebook's monitoring software detects and suspends such accounts. These policies prevent some users from having a Facebook account and profile with their real name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Janrain</span> CIAM start-up based in Portland

Janrain, sometimes styled as JanRain, is a customer profile and identity management (CIAM) software provider based in Portland, Oregon, United States. It was established in 2002. Akamai acquired Janrain in January 2019.

Google's changes to its privacy policy on March 16, 2012, enabled the company to share data across a wide variety of services. These embedded services include millions of third-party websites that use AdSense and Analytics. The policy was widely criticized for creating an environment that discourages Internet innovation by making Internet users more fearful and wary of what they do online.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reception and criticism of WhatsApp security and privacy features</span> Reception and criticism of security and privacy features in the WhatsApp messaging service

This article provides a detailed chronological account of the historical reception and criticism of security and privacy features in the WhatsApp messaging service.

Account verification is the process of verifying that a new or existing account is owned and operated by a specified real individual or organization. A number of websites, for example social media websites, offer account verification services. Verified accounts are often visually distinguished by check mark icons or badges next to the names of individuals or organizations.

Meta Platforms Inc., or Meta for short, has faced a number of privacy concerns. These stem partly from the company's revenue model that involves selling information collected about its users for many things including advertisement targeting. Meta Platforms Inc. has also been a part of many data breaches that have occurred within the company. These issues and others are further described including user data concerns, vulnerabilities in the company's platform, investigations by pressure groups and government agencies, and even issues with students. In addition, employers and other organizations/individuals have been known to use Meta Platforms Inc. for their own purposes. As a result, individuals’ identities and private information have sometimes been compromised without their permission. In response to these growing privacy concerns, some pressure groups and government agencies have increasingly asserted the users’ right to privacy and to be able to control their personal data.

References

  1. ↑ Boyd, Danah (2012), "The politics of "real names"", Communications of the ACM , 55 (8): 29–31, doi:10.1145/2240236.2240247, S2CID   10887087 .
  2. ↑ Blue, Violet (15 July 2014). "Google reverses 'real names' policy, apologizes". ZDNet.
  3. ↑ "Battle.net - English Forums -> Battle.net Update: Upcoming Changes to Forums". Archived from the original on 9 July 2010. Retrieved 1 April 2014.
  4. ↑ Adam Holisky (6 July 2010). "Official forum changes, real life names to be displayed". Wow Insider (Joystiq). Archived from the original on 9 September 2013. Retrieved 17 September 2013.
  5. ↑ Newman, Jared (9 July 2010). "Four Lessons From Blizzard's Real ID Snafu". Technologizer. Retrieved 27 September 2012.
  6. ↑ Tim Carmody (26 July 2011). "Google+ Identity Crisis: What's at Stake With Real Names and Privacy". Epicenter. Wired.com. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  7. ↑ Alexis Madrigal (5 August 2011). "Why Facebook and Google's Concept of 'Real Names' Is Revolutionary". The Atlantic. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  8. ↑ Pfanner, Eric (4 September 2011), "Naming Names on the Internet", The New York Times .
  9. ↑ "User Content and Conduct Policy". 12 July 2011. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  10. ↑ Violet Blue (23 July 2011). "Google Plus Deleting Accounts En Masse: No Clear Answers". Pulp Tech. ZDNet. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  11. ↑ Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry (4 August 2011). "Google Banned Facebook Product Director Blake Ross From Google+ *". Businessinsider.com. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  12. ↑ Leslie Horn (18 July 2011). "William Shatner's Profile Briefly Removed from Google+". PCMag.com. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  13. 1 2 3 Jillian York (29 July 2011). "A Case for Pseudonyms". Electronic Frontier Foundation . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  14. ↑ Bradley Horowitz (26 July 2011). "+Robert Scoble shared some information based on…" . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  15. ↑ Saurabh Sharma (17 August 2011). "Hi everyone, I'm Saurabh, a product manager on the Google+…" . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  16. ↑ Wen-Ai Yu (19 August 2011). "Not sure whether +Dolly Parton is actually that Dolly…" . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  17. ↑ "Victory! Google Surrenders in the Nymwars", Eva Galperin and Jillian C. York, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 19 October 2011
  18. ↑ Google. "Your Name and Google+ Profiles" . Retrieved 13 March 2013.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  19. ↑ "Google Plus". When we launched Google+ over three years ago, we had a lot of restrictions. 15 July 2014.
  20. 1 2 Google. "Your Name and Google+ Profiles" . Retrieved 18 October 2011.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  21. ↑ Natalie Villalobos. "Why is my name on my google profile "violating the community standard"? All I did was try to change my name!" . Retrieved 23 August 2011.
  22. ↑ Rosoff, Matt (28 August 2011), "Google+ Isn't Just A Social Network, It's An "Identity Service"", San Francisco Chronicle .
  23. ↑ Horowitz, Bradley (24 January 2012), Toward a more inclusive naming policy for Google+
  24. ↑ Claburn, Thomas (24 January 2012), Google+ Accepts Pseudonyms, With Caveats, InformationWeek
  25. ↑ Blue, Violet (26 January 2012), Google's Pseudonym Problem: New Implementation Revealed, ZDNet
  26. ↑ "2011 in Review: Nymwars". Electronic Frontier Foundation. 26 December 2011. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  27. ↑ Jamie Zawinski (20 August 2011). "Nym Wars" . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  28. ↑ Kevin Marks (20 August 2011). "Epeus' epigone: Google Plus must stop this Identity Theatre" . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  29. ↑ Robert Scoble (20 August 2011). "Several people have asked me to make this a real post so it…" . Retrieved 27 August 2011.
  30. ↑ Alex "Skud" Bayley (10 June 2010). "Hacker News and Pseudonymity". GeekFeminism.org. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
  31. ↑ Martin Kaste (28 September 2011). "Who Are You, Really? Activists Fight for Pseudonyms". NPR.org. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
  32. ↑ Myles Peterson (4 October 2011). "Brand Wars". CanberraTimes.com.au. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
  33. ↑ Stilgherrian (27 September 2011). "Google+: What's in a Name?". ABC.net.au. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
  34. ↑ Alex, Jirko (7 September 2011), Google+: Klarnamenzwang-Disput verwirrt Unionspolitiker (in German), ComputerBase.
  35. ↑ danah boyd (5 September 2011), Designing for social Norms (or How Not to Create Angry Mobs)
  36. ↑ "What names are allowed on Facebook?", Facebook
  37. ↑ Tsukayama, Hayley (15 November 2011), "Salman Rushdie wins name tiff with Facebook", The Washington Post
  38. 1 2 Swift, Mike (17 November 2011), "'Nymwars' debate over online identity explodes", San Jose Mercury News
  39. ↑ Blue, Violet (12 September 2014), "Facebook nymwars: Disproportionately outing LGBT performers, users furious", ZDNet
  40. ↑ Hatmaker, Taylor (3 October 2014). "RealNamePolice and the real story behind Facebook's name policy fumble". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.