Advance Ohio Higher Education Act | |
---|---|
![]() | |
136th Ohio General Assembly | |
| |
Citation | O.H. Legis. Assemb. . Reg. Sess. 2025-2026 (2025). |
Territorial extent | ![]() |
Enacted by | Ohio Senate |
Enacted | February 12, 2025 |
Enacted by | Ohio House of Representatives |
Enacted | March 19, 2025 |
Signed by | Mike DeWine |
Signed | March 28, 2025 |
Effective | June 27, 2025 |
Legislative history | |
First chamber: Ohio Senate | |
Introduced by | Jerry R. Cirino |
Introduced | January 22, 2025 |
First reading | February 12, 2025 |
Voting summary |
|
Second reading | March 26, 2025 |
Voting summary |
|
Second chamber: Ohio House of Representatives | |
Voting summary |
|
Passed | March 19, 2025 |
Related legislation | |
Florida Senate Bill 266 | |
Status: In force |
Ohio Senate Bill 1 (S.B. 1), also known as the Advance Ohio Higher Education Act, is a 2025 law in the US state of Ohio that bans diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-based hiring and enrollment in universities as well as banning school faculty from going on strike. [1] It was signed by Governor Mike DeWine on March 28, 2025, and took effect on June 27, 2025. [2] [3]
The bill affects public colleges and universities. Part of its intention is to support "intellectual diversity". [4] Much of the controversy surrounding S.B. 1 involves it potentially targeting the left-wing and being ambiguous with its wording. [5] [6] It was passed along party lines in both chambers, with all Ohio Democrats opposing and five Ohio Republicans; two in the Senate and three in the House. [7] [8] A similar bill, Senate Bill 83, was proposed in 2023 by the same author but was never voted on. [9]
S.B. 1 bans school faculty from going on strike in the state of Ohio. It bans hiring and scholarships based on current diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. It also restricts universities from commenting on anything "controversial", more specifically relating to political issues. [10] An American civics course would also be required for students in public universities. [11] Schools that violate the law would have state funding revoked. [12]
Lieutenant Governor Jim Tressel congratulated the author of S.B. 1, Jerry Cirino, on the passage of the bill. [13]
Hundreds of students at Ohio State University testified against S.B. 1 and promised to leave the state if it became law. [14] Due to a request primarily by Youngstown State University staff to put it to the voters as a referendum, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost released a statement that it meets the requirements and can begin the process of gathering signatures. Yost himself did not publicly oppose the bill. [15] [16] This petition has drawn the support of several Ohio Democratic politicians including Casey Weinstein. [17]
As S.B. 1 advanced, Ohio State students, faculty and staff mobilized on campus. On March 4, 2025, a rally branded “Shred SB1” gathered at the William Thompson statue on the Oval (1–4 p.m.), organized by AAUP–Ohio State and the Ohio Student Association. Speakers included OSU faculty from more than 20 disciplines, State Rep. Munira Abdullahi, union representatives (Ohio Federation of Teachers, Wex Workers United, IATSE Local 12), and student organizations such as the National Society of Black Engineers, Students for Justice in Palestine, and Jews for Justice in Palestine. [18] Reporting on the same event described “hundreds” of participants and more than a dozen speakers in a statewide day of action; AAUP–OSU leaders and students framed S.B. 1 as an attack on academic freedom and labor rights, with chants such as “S.B. 1 is a war on people.” [19]
Faculty organizers also described a chilling effect on classroom content—one instructor reported fearing to teach material on Palestinian artists. [18] Labor groups emphasized provisions curbing collective bargaining and strikes; the president of the Ohio Federation of Teachers warned S.B. 1 would “take away … rights to have a voice in what their workplace looks like.” [19] Opponents highlighted potential academic and economic impacts, arguing the bill would deter recruitment, degrade educational quality, and risk loss of federal research dollars if faculty depart the state. [19] The rally coincided with a same-day social-media post by President Donald Trump threatening to cut federal funding from institutions that “allow illegal protests,” and to have protesters expelled, arrested, or deported—statements free-speech advocates criticized as inconsistent with First Amendment protections. [18] University officials said they supported participants’ freedom of expression during the protest. [19]
Opposition extended beyond the rally. Prior to Senate passage, opponents submitted more than 830 written testimonies and over 200 in-person statements—well over 1,000 public comments against S.B. 1—with only a small fraction in support; [18] contemporaneous coverage likewise noted “hundreds” of opponent testimonies that “significantly outweighed” supporter submissions. [19] In the week leading up to the demonstration, Ohio State closed its Office of Diversity and Inclusion and the Office of Student Life’s Center for Belonging and Social Change, eliminating 16 professional staff positions; campus organizers cited these actions as part of the wider climate motivating opposition to S.B. 1. [19]