Organization Designation Authorization

Last updated
FAA document that establishes the ODA program FAA National Policy - Organization Designation Authorization Procedures ORDER 8100.15A.pdf
FAA document that establishes the ODA program

The Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) program was established by FAA Order 8100.15() (image at right). The ODA, in conjunction with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), grants airworthiness designee authority to organizations or companies. The regulations addressing the ODA program are found in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 183, subpart D, sections 183.41 through 813.67.

Contents

The ODA program's intention is to elaborate on the tasks that are available their organizations design authorizations. While adding in this "final rule" for designs, the ODA also added in a phase-out timeline for design programs.

The FAA asserted that the ODA program does not introduce any type of self-certification. [1] However, the practice has been criticized for substantial manufacturer influence over personnel designation and design certification, particularly after the Boeing 787 Dreamliner battery fires in 2013 and the Boeing 737 MAX groundings in 2019.

Purpose

"The ODA program expands the scope of approved tasks available to organizational designees; increases the number of organizations eligible for organizational designee authorizations; and establishes a more comprehensive, systems-based approach to managing designated organizations." [1]

The ODA program was created for the FAA to standardize the operation and oversight of organizational designees. [1]

This program aims to "increase the efficiency with which the FAA appoints and oversees designee organizations, and allow the FAA to concentrate its resources on the most safety-critical matters." [1]

Types of Organizational Designation Authorizations

The following are the different types of Organizational Designation Authorizations for which qualified organizations may apply. [2]

History

In the "VISION 100—CENTURY OF AVIATION REAUTHORIZATION ACT" of 2003, legislators passed a section entitled "DESIGN ORGANIZATION CERTIFICATES", which instructed the FAA to deputize designers, so that the designers would "certify compliance with the requirements and minimum standards... for the type certification of aircraft, aircraft engines, propellers, or appliances." [3]

In 2005, the FAA granted Boeing "in-house oversight for new planes in production and approval of major repairs and alterations". [4] The manufacturers’ engineer is delegated to review the design, plan and observe tests, and certify they meet applicable standards. [4] FAA staff do attend "many critical tests involving safety issues — such as flammability of new materials and design of flight controls". [4] The ODA status is granted for an aircraft manufacturer to act as the proxy on certification oversight. [5] Previous to the ODA programme, "engineers in that role were approved by and reported directly to the FAA". [4]

In 2011, Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety Margaret Gilligan issued National Policy Order 8100.15A to establish the "procedures, guidance, and limitations of authority" the FAA grants to an organization under the ODA program. Order 8100.15A was 293 pages long and composed of 16 chapters and seven appendices. The legislative authority for the ODA program was derived under Title 49 of the US Code § 44702: Issuance of Certificates, which authorized the FAA to "delegate to a qualified private person a matter related to issuing certificates, or related to the examination, testing, and inspection necessary to issue a certificate on behalf of the FAA Administrator". [1] The FAA established the ODA program in 14 CFR part 183, subpart D: Representatives of the Administrator. [6]

Boeing has 1,500 people in its ODA, under supervision by an FAA team of 45 people, of which only 24 are engineers. [7] By 2018, the FAA was letting Boeing certify 96 percent of its own work. [8]

Historical examples

The Boeing 737 series had suffered from rudder issues in the past, resulting in several accidents. A previous model of the 737 also experienced a similar mix of questionable safety assessment, insufficient pilot training, and automated system malfunction when Turkish Airlines Flight 1951 crashed. [9] [10] In February 2020, Boeing and NTSB officials refused to cooperate with a new Dutch lawmakers inquiry. [11]

In November 2019, the online media "The Air Current" reviewed historical parallels between the MAX and the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, which had been grounded after the crash of American Airlines Flight 191. [12] A safety panel was convened by the FAA under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences to investigate both the design of the DC-10 and the regulatory system itself. In its report, published in June 1980, the safety panel highlighted the FAA's reliance on the manufacturer during the certification process and the fact that in most cases it performs only a "cursory review" of the manufacturer's information. [13] [14] The New York Times noted that the panel found "critical deficiencies in the way the Government certifies the safety of American-built airliners". [15]

For Marian Pistik, head of asset management at International Airfinance Corporation, the case of the MAX is unprecedented due to allegations of wrongdoings. The groundings of the DC-10 and of the Dreamliner could not be directly compared to the global B737 MAX grounding: "there was no suspicion that Boeing or any OEM knew of the problem and tried to disguise it or […] any suspicion of wrongdoing or not being compliant or forthcoming with the issues of the 737 Max." [16]

Oversight of delegation policies by SOCAC

The Safety Oversight and Certification Advisory Committee (SOCAC) was created by the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018. The committee will provide advice to the Secretary of Transportation on policies related to FAA safety oversight and certification programs and activities, utilization of delegation and designation authorities. [17] [18]

Controversies

The ODA process has been criticized as detrimental to safety. [5] Since 2012, the FAA had successfully pushed to increase the scope of delegating safety checks to the manufacturer. [19]

On 4 February 2013, an article in The Seattle Times written by journalist Kyung Song [4] critiqued the process by which the airworthiness certificate was obtained for the Boeing 787 because approvals for the lithium ion battery system were akin "to the fox guarding the chicken coop". [5] In the words of an onlooker, "Song stated that Boeing became an FAA designee [sic] with wide latitude in picking the company’s own engineers to sign off on their employer’s work on behalf of the FAA". [5]

Executive-summary - Special Committee to Review the FAA's Aircraft Certification Process 01.svg
Executive-summary – Special Committee to Review the FAA's Aircraft Certification Process [20]
Official report - Special Committee to Review the FAA's Aircraft Certification Process 02.svg
Official report – Special Committee to Review the FAA's Aircraft Certification Process [21]

In April 2019, U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Elaine L. Chao, who boarded a MAX flight on March 12 amid calls to ground the aircraft [22] created the Special Committee to Review the FAA's Aircraft Certification Process to review of Organization Designation Authorization, which granted Boeing authority to review systems on behalf of the FAA, during the certification of the 737 MAX 8. The committee recommended integrating human performance factors and consider all levels of pilot experience, but defended the ODA against any reforms. [23] [24] Relatives of those on board the accident flights condemned the report for calling the ODA an "effective" process. [25]

In June 2020, the United States Senate criticized the FAA for failing to turn over 737 MAX documents and accused the FAA of trying "to keep us in the dark". [26] The U.S. Inspector General said that by 2017, Boeing was handling all certification checks on behalf of the FAA. [27]

FAA response to criticisms of excessive delegation

In response to questions from Project On Government Oversight, a FAA spokesperson said “FAA has never allowed companies to police themselves or self-certify their aircraft. With strict FAA oversight, delegation [of certification] extends the rigor of the FAA certification process to other recognized professionals, thereby multiplying the technical expertise focused on assuring an aircraft meets FAA standards.” [28]

In May 2020, the FAA announced a reform of existing processes to improve management of aircraft development and corporate practices. [29] In June 2020, a Senate Bill calling for changes to the existing ODA was being drafted to resolve potential conflict of interest between Boeing, FAA, designated representatives and whistleblowers. [30] FAA Director Steve Dickenson admitted that "mistakes were made" with the 737 MAX and that the implications of MCAS were not fully understood. [31]

In August 2020, the FAA proposed a $1.2 million fine on Boeing for exerting undue pressure on designated inspectors to expedite aircraft approvals. [32]

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Aviation Administration</span> U.S. government agency regulating civil aviation

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Its powers include air traffic control, certification of personnel and aircraft, setting standards for airports, and protection of U.S. assets during the launch or re-entry of commercial space vehicles. Powers over neighboring international waters were delegated to the FAA by authority of the International Civil Aviation Organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Type certificate</span> Document noting the airworthiness of a certain type of aircraft

A type certificate signifies the airworthiness of a particular category of aircraft, according to its manufacturing design. Certification confirms that the aircraft of a new type intended for serial production is in compliance with applicable airworthiness requirements established by the national air law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft maintenance</span> Performance of tasks which maintain an aircrafts airworthiness

Aircraft maintenance is the performance of tasks required to ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft or aircraft part, including overhaul, inspection, replacement, defect rectification, and the embodiment of modifications, compliance with airworthiness directives and repair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing</span> American global aerospace and defense corporation

The Boeing Company is an American multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and sells airplanes, rotorcraft, rockets, satellites, telecommunications equipment, and missiles worldwide. The company also provides leasing and product support services. Boeing is among the largest global aerospace manufacturers; it is the third-largest defense contractor in the world based on 2020 revenue and is the largest exporter in the United States by dollar value. Boeing's stock is a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

A Designated Airworthiness Representative (DAR) is a private person designated by the United States Federal Aviation Administration to act on its behalf in the certification of type certificated and amateur-built aircraft for the issuance of airworthiness certificates, special flight permits, import aircraft, export certificates for products and articles, conformity inspections, and field approvals for repair and alterations. Most DARs have limited and/or certain "functions" authorized by the FAA based on their experience and technical background. A DAR may charge a fee for their services. Qualifications and policies for appointment of Designated Airworthiness Representatives are established in FAA Order 8100.8.

An emergency Airworthiness Directive (EAD) is an airworthiness directive issued when an unsafe condition exists that requires immediate action by an aircraft owner or operator. An EAD is published by a responsible authority such as the FOCA, EASA or FAA related to airworthiness and maintenance of aircraft and aircraft parts. It contains measures which must be accomplished and the related periods to preserve their airworthiness. Technical information is addressed to operators and maintenance organisations of affected aircraft only. EADs become effective upon receipt of notification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 737 MAX</span> Airliner family by Boeing

The Boeing 737 MAX is the fourth generation of the Boeing 737, a narrow-body airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes, a division of American company Boeing. It succeeds the Boeing 737 Next Generation (NG) and competes with the Airbus A320neo family. The new series was announced on August 30, 2011. It took its maiden flight on January 29, 2016 and was certified by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in March 2017. The first delivery was a MAX 8 in May 2017 to Malindo Air, with which it commenced service on May 22, 2017.

FlyersRights.org is a United States based not-for-profit organization that advocates for the rights and interests of airline passengers. It maintains a staffed office in Washington, D.C. for advocacy before all three branches of the US Federal Government. It operates a toll-free telephone Hotline, an email helpline for individual air travelers and a website with a 'Know Your Rights' online guide. It issues research and policy papers, conducts surveys, sponsors online petitions, maintains an active website and social media presence, provides expert advice on aviation consumer issues to public policy makers and opinion leaders and engages in public education activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lion Air Flight 610</span> 2018 aircraft crash in the Java Sea, Indonesia, killing 189

Lion Air Flight 610 (JT610/LNI610) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Soekarno–Hatta International Airport, Jakarta, to Depati Amir Airport, Pangkal Pinang, in Indonesia. On 29 October 2018, the Boeing 737 MAX operating the route crashed into the Java Sea 13 minutes after takeoff, killing all 189 passengers and crew. It was the first major accident involving the new Boeing 737 MAX series of aircraft, introduced in 2017, and the highest death toll of any accident or incident involving a 737-series aircraft, surpassing Air India Express Flight 812 in 2010. It was the deadliest accident in Lion Air's history, surpassing the 2004 Lion Air Flight 538 that killed 25, the second-deadliest aircraft accident in Indonesia behind Garuda Indonesia Flight 152, and the deadliest aircraft accident in the Java Sea, surpassing Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302</span> 2019 plane crash near Bishoftu, Ethiopia

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 was a scheduled international passenger flight from Bole International Airport in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Nairobi, Kenya. On 10 March 2019, the Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft which operated the flight crashed near the town of Bishoftu six minutes after takeoff, killing all 157 people aboard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 737 MAX groundings</span> March 2019 worldwide grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX following two fatal crashes in five months

The Boeing 737 MAX passenger airliner was grounded worldwide between March 2019 and December 2020 – longer in many jurisdictions – after 346 people died in two similar crashes: Lion Air Flight 610 on October 29, 2018 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 on March 10, 2019. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) resisted grounding the aircraft until March 13, 2019, when it received evidence of accident similarities. By then, 51 other regulators had already grounded the plane, and by March 18, 2019, all 387 of the aircraft in service were grounded.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System</span> Boeing flight control system responsible for 346 deaths

The Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) is a flight stabilizing feature developed by Boeing that became notorious for its role in two fatal accidents of the 737 MAX, which killed all 346 passengers and crew among both flights. Systems similar to the Boeing 737 MCAS were previously included on the Boeing 707 and Boeing KC-46, a 767 variant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Dickson (executive)</span> American aviator and government official (born 1957)

Stephen Marshall Dickson is an American former Air Force pilot and Delta Air Lines executive who served as the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration from August 2019 to March 2022.

Many aviation-related events took place in 2020. The aviation industry was impacted by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reactions to the Boeing 737 MAX groundings</span>

The two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes in October 2018 and March 2019 which were similar in nature – both aircraft were newly delivered and crashed shortly after takeoff – and the subsequent groundings of the global 737 MAX fleet drew mixed reactions from multiple organizations. Boeing expressed its sympathy to the relatives of the Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crash victims, while simultaneously defending the aircraft against any faults and suggesting the pilots had insufficient training, until rebutted by evidence. After the 737 MAX fleet was globally grounded, starting in China with the Civil Aviation Administration of China the day after the second crash, Boeing provided several outdated return-to-service timelines, the earliest of which was "in the coming weeks" after the second crash. On October 11, 2019, David L. Calhoun replaced Dennis Muilenburg as chairman of Boeing, then succeeded Muilenburg's role as chief executive officer in January 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial impact of the Boeing 737 MAX groundings</span>

The Boeing 737 MAX groundings have had a deep financial effect on the aviation industry and a significant effect on the national economy of the United States. No airline took delivery of the MAX during the groundings. Boeing slowed MAX production to 42 aircraft per month until in January 2020, when they halted until the airplane is reapproved by regulators. Boeing has suffered directly through increased costs, loss of sales and revenue, loss of reputation, victims litigation, client compensation, decreased credit rating and lowered stock value. In January 2020, the company estimated a loss of $18.4 billion for 2019, and it reported 183 canceled MAX orders for the year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 737 MAX certification</span> Certification of aircraft

The Boeing 737 MAX was initially certified in 2017 by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Global regulators grounded the plane in 2019 following fatal crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302. Both crashes were linked to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a new automatic flight control feature. Investigations in both crashes determined that Boeing and the FAA favored cost-saving solutions, but ultimately produced a flawed design of the MCAS instead. The FAA's Organization Designation Authorization program, allowing manufacturers to act on its behalf, was also questioned for weakening its oversight of Boeing.

Dominic Gates is an Irish-American aerospace journalist for The Seattle Times, former math teacher, and Pulitzer Prize winner. He has been assigned to cover Boeing for The Times since 2003. Gates was a co-recipient of the 2020 Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting alongside Steve Miletich, Mike Baker, and Lewis Kamb for their coverage of the Boeing 737 MAX crashes and investigations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FAA Order 8110.37</span> FAA Order 8110.37 defines the FAAs system of DERs. DERs issue signed FAA Form 8110-3 approvals.

FAA Order 8110.37 , Designated Engineering Representative (DER) Handbook, is a handbook of procedures, technical guidelines, limitations of authority, tools, and resources for Designated Engineering Representatives (DERs), who are appointees of the Federal Aviation Administration. Both DERs and the FAA offices managing them have individual and mutual roles and responsibilities in the certifications of safety of aircraft and aviation systems. This handbook provides a better understanding of these roles. Although intended for the roles of DERs, this order may be useful to ODA engineering Unit Members, who are effectively DERs managed by aviation manufacturers rather than by the FAA.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Establishment of Organization Designation Authorization Program". Federal Register. 2005-10-13. Retrieved 2019-08-31.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  2. ↑ "Types of Organizational Designation Authorizations". www.faa.gov. Retrieved 2019-08-31.
  3. ↑ PUBLIC LAW 108–176—DEC. 12, 2003 VISION 100—CENTURY OF AVIATION REAUTHORIZATION ACT (PDF). Washington: Government Publishing Office. 12 December 2003.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 "FAA faulted for outsourcing 787 safety checks to Boeing". Seattle Times. 4 February 2013. Lithium-ion batteries are well known for being much more flammable than older nickel-cadmium batteries, with fires that are all but impossible to extinguish until a battery's solvent-based liquid electrolytes burn out.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Rioux, Mike (8 February 2013). "Boeing Has FAA Organizational Design Approval". JDA Journal.
  6. ↑ "U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy SUBJ: Organization Designation Authorization Procedures ORDER 8100.15A" (PDF). faa.gov. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION.
  7. ↑ "Max Disasters Fuel Outcry Over How FAA Let Boeing Self-Certify". Bloomberg. 2019-12-03.
  8. ↑ Kitroeff, Natalie; Gelles, David; Nicas, Jack (July 27, 2019). "The Roots of Boeing's 737 Max Crisis: A Regulator Relaxes Its Oversight". The New York Times .
  9. ↑ Tucker, Emma (2020-01-20). "Boeing's Responsibility for a Deadly 737 Crash in 2009 'Got Buried': NYT". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2020-01-20.
  10. ↑ Hamby, Chris (2020-01-20). "How Boeing's Responsibility in a Deadly Crash 'Got Buried'". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2020-01-20.
  11. ↑ Hamby, Chris; Moses, Claire (2020-02-06). "Boeing Refuses to Cooperate With New Inquiry Into Deadly Crash". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2020-02-07.
  12. ↑ "The DC-10, 737 Max and the struggle to polish a tarnished airplane". The Air Current. 2019-11-22. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  13. ↑ "Searching for 40-year old lessons for Boeing in the grounding of the DC-10". The Air Current. 2019-10-15. Retrieved 2019-10-16.
  14. ↑ Improving Aircraft Safety. National Research Council. June 24, 1980.
  15. ↑ Witkin, Richard (19 June 1980). "U.S. Safeguards Faulted As Plane Accidents Rise; Aviation Safety First of five articles. Delegation of Authority A Three-Month Inquiry Panel, in Report to U.S., Finds Major Flaws in Certifying Aircraft Concentration on Certification Program Antedates Administrator Fatal Accidents Have Declined Many Attributed to Pilot Error Prone to Erroneous Readings Agency Prescribes Standards Prime Concern of Panel Not Enough Manpower Production-Line Derelictions Crack in Plane's Flange Cadre of Specialists Pilots Want a Voice Aviation Officials Opposed". The New York Times.
  16. ↑ "Grounding of Boeing's 737 Max has 'no historic precedent'". Business Traveller. Retrieved 2019-11-01.
  17. ↑ "FAA's new safety committee taking shape". www.ishn.com. Retrieved 2019-09-01.
  18. ↑ "Advisory and Rulemaking Committees – Safety Oversight and Certification Advisory Committee (SOCAC)". www.faa.gov. Retrieved 2019-09-01.
  19. ↑ "With close industry ties, FAA safety chief pushed more delegation of oversight to Boeing". The Seattle Times. 2019-04-14. Retrieved 2020-06-27.
  20. ↑ Official Report of the Special Committee to review the Federal Aviation Administration's Aircraft Certification Process Executive Summary (PDF) (Report). U.S. DOT. 2020-01-16.
  21. ↑ Official Report of the Special Committee to review the Federal Aviation Administration's Aircraft Certification Process (PDF) (Report). U.S. DOT. 2020-01-16.
  22. ↑ LeBeau, Phil (2019-03-13). "Feeling pressure to ground Boeing planes, US Transportation Secretary flies on 737 Max 8". CNBC. Retrieved 2020-01-19.
  23. ↑ Pasztor, Andy; Cameron, Doug (16 January 2020). "Panel Clears 737 MAX's Safety-Approval Process at FAA" . The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  24. ↑ German, Kent. "Independent panel says process for certifying 737 Max was safe". CNET. Retrieved 2020-01-19.
  25. ↑ Leggett, Theo (2020-01-17). "Victims' families slam report into 737 Max crashes". BBC News. Retrieved 2020-01-19.
  26. ↑ "Senate Examines FAA's Certification Of Boeing's Troubled 737 Max Airplane". NPR.org. Retrieved 2020-06-27.
  27. ↑ "Inspector General report details how Boeing played down MCAS in original 737 MAX certification – and FAA missed it". The Seattle Times. 2020-06-30. Retrieved 2020-07-02.
  28. ↑ "How the FAA Ceded Aviation Safety Oversight to Boeing". Project On Government Oversight. Retrieved 2019-08-31.
  29. ↑ Whiteman, Lou (2020-05-19). "FAA to Reform Aircraft Review Process Following 737 Max Disasters". The Motley Fool. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
  30. ↑ Cirium2020-06-03T21:31:00+01:00. "Senate bill seeks FAA changes after 737 Max crashes". Flight Global. Retrieved 2020-06-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  31. ↑ "'Mistakes were made': US aviation body admits 737 MAX lapses". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 2020-06-28.
  32. ↑ Aratani, Lori; Duncan, Ian (August 6, 2020). "FAA proposes $1.25 million fine for Boeing, alleging managers pressured employees to rush inspections". Washington Post. Retrieved 2020-08-08.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.