Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act

Last updated
Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
NicknamesMicah's Law [1]
Announced inthe 115th United States Congress
Number of co-sponsors182
Codification
Titles affected Title 18 of the United States Code
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the House as H.R. 36 by Trent Franks (R-AZ) on January 3, 2017
  • Committee consideration by House Judiciary Committee
  • Passed the House on October 3, 2017 (237–189)

The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (also colloquially known as Micah's Law) is a congressional bill that would, in most cases, make it unlawful to perform an abortion if the estimated post-fertilization age of a fetus is 20 weeks or more. The bill is based upon the assertion that a fetus is capable of feeling pain during an abortion at and after that point in a pregnancy.

Contents

The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act was first introduced in Congress in 2013. It successfully passed the House of Representatives in 2013, 2015, and 2017. The bill has twice received a majority of votes in the Senate, but has failed to reach the 60 votes required to break a filibuster.

Name and provisions

The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act has become known as Micah's Law because of Micah Pickering, a boy from Iowa who was born prematurely at 22 weeks' gestation [2] in 2012 and survived; Pickering appeared in a 2016 Susan B. Anthony List election advertisement criticizing Hillary Clinton's support for legal abortion after 20 weeks' gestation. [3] [4] Pickering and his family have appeared at press conferences supporting the bill. [3] [5]

In the legislative findings section, the bill states that pain receptors (nociceptors) "are present throughout the unborn child's entire body", that "nerves link these receptors to the brain's thalamus and subcortical plate by no later than 20 weeks after fertilization", and that anesthesia is routinely administered to fetuses undergoing fetal surgery (thus supporting the conclusion that fetuses feel pain). [6]

The bill prohibits all abortions after 20 weeks post-fertilization unless the abortion is judged necessary to save the life of the mother; is the result of a rape of an adult woman who has received counseling or medical treatment for the rape; or is the result of an act of rape or incest against a minor that has been reported to a law enforcement agency or other government authority. [6]

The bill imposes a criminal penalty against any person performing an abortion after 20 weeks. That penalty consists of a fine, imprisonment for up to five years, or both. [6] It bars any prosecution of a woman receiving an abortion after 20 weeks, and allows any woman on whom an abortion is performed after 20 weeks in violation of the law to seek civil action against the person who performed the abortion. [6]

Legislative history

The bill was first introduced by Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona in the 113th Congress on April 26, 2013. [7] The bill passed the House on June 18, 2013 by a vote of 228–196. [8] [9] It was introduced in the Senate in November 2013 by Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. [10]

Franks re-introduced the bill in the 114th Congress on January 6, 2015. The House passed the bill by a vote of 242–184 on May 13, 2015. [11] [12] Graham re-introduced the bill in the Senate in June 2015. On September 22, 2015, the bill was filibustered in the Senate. Fifty-four senators voted for cloture (in other words, to send the bill to the Senate floor) and 42 voted against cloture; accordingly, the bill failed to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to break the filibuster. [13] [14]

Franks re-introduced the bill in the 115th Congress on January 3, 2017. On October 2, 2017, the White House issued a statement of policy announcing that Donald Trump's advisors would recommend he sign the bill if it reached his desk. [15] The House passed the bill on October 3, 2017, by a vote of 237–189. [16] [17] Graham introduced the bill in the Senate on October 5, 2017. The bill was considered by the Senate on January 29, 2018. The bill failed to receive the 60 votes needed for cloture; the vote was 51–46. [18] Forty-eight Republicans and three Democrats voted for the bill, while 44 Democrats and two Republicans voted against it. [19]

Public opinion

Numerous polls have shown that a ban on abortions after 20 weeks is supported by a majority or a plurality of Americans. [20] In 2013, The Washington Post reported that women supported banning abortions after 20 weeks in higher numbers than men. [21] The following table contains data from public opinion polls that asked Americans about their thoughts on banning abortions after 20 weeks.

Poll sourceDateQuestion wordingSupport/Favor
(somewhat/strongly combined)		Oppose
(somewhat/strongly combined)		Undecided/No Opinion
McLaughlin & Associates/Susan B. Anthony List January 2017"The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed legislation that would prohibit abortions after 20 weeks, or five months of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape and incest. Do you support or oppose the legislation outlawing most abortions after 20 weeks, or five months of pregnancy?"62%25%12%
Knights of Columbus/Marist January 2017"Please tell me if you strongly support, support, oppose, or strongly oppose banning abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy except to save the life of the mother?"59%35%5%
Quinnipiac November 2014"As you may know, in 2013 the House of Representatives approved legislation that would ban virtually all abortions nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in cases of rape and incest that are reported to authorities. Would you support or oppose such legislation?"60%33%7%
Washington Post/ABC News July 2013"As you may know, in 2013 the House of Representatives approved legislation that would ban virtually all abortions nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in cases of rape and incest that are reported to authorities. Would you support or oppose such legislation?"60%33%7%
NBC News/Wall Street Journal July 2013Unavailable44%37%–
Rasmussen Reports July 2013Unavailable44%41%15%
National Journal [20] June 2013"As you may know, the House of Representatives recently approved legislation that would ban virtually all abortions nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in cases of rape and incest that are reported to authorities. (Supporters say the legislation is necessary because they believe a fetus can feel pain at that point of the pregnancy.) (Opponents say it undermines the right to abortion that the U.S. Supreme Court established in 1973.) Would you support or oppose such legislation?"48%44%–
Huffington Post/YouGov June 2013"Would you favor or oppose a federal law that would ban most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in cases of rape or incest?"59%30%12%

An additional poll not included in the table above was conducted by the Washington Post and ABC News in July 2013 asked votes to choose between allowing legal abortion without restriction in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy and allowing it without restriction in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Given that choice, 56% of adults preferred the 20-week threshold, while 27% supported a 24-week threshold. [22]

Planned Parenthood commissioned an August 2013 poll that asked respondents whether abortion should be legal or illegal in the following scenarios: carrying the pregnancy to term would cause serious long-term health problems to the mother; the fetus is not viable and personal/health circumstances are such that she shouldn't continue pregnancy; the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest; and the fetus has severe abnormalities that would cause fetal death or extreme disability. [23] In each scenario, between 58% and 66% respondents said abortion after 20 weeks should be legal. [23]

Politicians, political parties, and interest groups

After the House passed the bill in 2015, Hillary Clinton criticized the bill as "a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, which has protected a woman's constitutional right to privacy for over forty years." [24]

The 2016 Republican Party national platform specifically endorsed the federal version of the act. [25] Most of the candidates running for the Republican nomination for president in 2016 pledged support for a 20-week abortion ban. [26] In September 2016, Donald Trump—then the Republican nominee for President—wrote a letter to anti-abortion leaders committing to sign the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act if elected. [27]

Similar state laws

Pain-capable abortion bans in the U.S. .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Banned based on fetal pain Ban enacted not based on basis of fetal pain Ban blocked by courts No ban Map of US state pain-capable abortion bans.svg
Pain-capable abortion bans in the U.S.
  Banned based on fetal pain
  Ban enacted not based on basis of fetal pain
  Ban blocked by courts
  No ban

As of October 2017, 21 states had passed laws banning abortion after 20 weeks' gestation. In Arizona and Idaho, such laws have been blocked by courts and are not in effect. [28]

In 2012, Trent Franks introduced the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would use Congress's legislative authority over the District of Columbia under Article I of the United States Constitution to prohibit abortions in D.C. after twenty weeks. The bill received majority support in the House by a vote of 220–154, but failed to achieve the two-thirds majority needed for passage. [29] [30]

Related Research Articles

Intact dilation and extraction is a surgical procedure that terminates and removes an intact fetus from the uterus. The procedure is used both after miscarriages and for abortions in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. When used to perform an abortion, an intact D&E can occur after feticide or on a live fetus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span>

In the United States, abortion is a divisive issue in politics and culture wars, though a majority of Americans support access to abortion. Abortion laws vary widely from state to state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trent Franks</span> American politician (born 1957)

Harold Trent Franks is an American businessman and former politician who served as the U.S. representative for Arizona's 8th congressional district from 2003 to 2017. He is a member of the Republican Party. During his tenure, Franks served as vice chairman of the United States House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces and chairman of the United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unborn Victims of Violence Act</span> Law that recognizes an embryo or fetus as a legal victim

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."

Prenatal perception is the study of the extent of somatosensory and other types of perception during pregnancy. In practical terms, this means the study of fetuses; none of the accepted indicators of perception are present in embryos. Studies in the field inform the abortion debate, along with certain related pieces of legislation in countries affected by that debate. As of 2022, there is no scientific consensus on whether a fetus can feel pain.

Fetal rights are the moral rights or legal rights of the human fetus under natural and civil law. The term fetal rights came into wide usage after Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark case that legalized abortion in the United States and was essentially overturned in 2022. The concept of fetal rights has evolved to include the issues of maternal substance use disorders, including alcohol use disorder and opioid use disorder. Most international human rights charters "clearly reject claims that human rights should attach from conception or any time before birth." While most international human rights instruments lack a universal inclusion of the fetus as a person for the purposes of human rights, the fetus is granted various rights in the constitutions and civil codes of some countries.

<i>The Silent Scream</i> 1984 film

The Silent Scream is a 1984 anti-abortion film created and narrated by Bernard Nathanson, a former abortion provider who had become an anti-abortion activist. It was produced by Crusade for Life, Inc., an evangelical anti-abortion organization, and has been described as a pro-life propaganda film. The film depicts the abortion process via ultrasound and shows an abortion taking place in the uterus. During the abortion process, the fetus is described as appearing to make outcries of pain and discomfort. The video has been a popular tool used by the anti-abortion campaign in arguing against abortion, but it has been criticized as misleading by members of the medical community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jackie Walorski</span> American politician (1963–2022)

Jacqueline Renae Walorski was an American politician who served as the U.S. representative for Indiana's 2nd congressional district from 2013 until her death in 2022. She was a member of the Republican Party. Walorski served in the Indiana House of Representatives, representing Indiana's 21st district, from 2005 to 2010. In 2010, she won the Republican nomination for Indiana's 2nd congressional district, but narrowly lost the general election to Democratic incumbent Joe Donnelly. Walorski won the seat in 2012 after Donnelly vacated it to run for the U.S. Senate, and was reelected four times.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

In United States politics, the Freedom of Choice Act was a bill which sought to codify into law for women a "fundamental right to choose to bear a child; terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability; or terminate a pregnancy after viability when necessary to protect her life or her health". It sought to prohibit a federal, state, or local governmental entity from denying or interfering with a woman's right to exercise such choices; or discriminating against the exercise of those rights in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information. Provides that such prohibition shall apply retroactively. It also authorizes an individual aggrieved by a violation of this Act to obtain appropriate relief, including relief against a governmental entity, in a civil action".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beginning of human personhood</span> Opinion as to the time when human personhood begins

The beginning of human personhood is the moment when a human is first recognized as a person. There are differences of opinion about the precise time when human personhood begins and the nature of that status. The issue arises in a number of fields, including science, religion, philosophy, and law, and is most acute in debates about abortion, stem cell research, reproductive rights, and fetal rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span>

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly, depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction, although there is no uniform federal law. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with few exceptions; others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while some allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

Wendy Kay Taylor Nanney was a Republican member of the South Carolina House of Representatives (2008-2016) representing District 22, a portion of Greenville County. She currently serves as Practice Manager at Piedmont Women's Center, an anti-abortion, pregnancy support organization.

"War on women" is a slogan in United States politics used to describe certain Republican Party policies and legislation as a wide-scale effort to restrict women's rights, especially reproductive rights, including abortion. Prominent Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer, as well as feminists, have used the phrase to criticize proponents of these laws as trying to force their social views on women through legislation. The slogan has been used to describe Republican policies in areas such as access to reproductive health services, particularly birth control and abortion services; the definition of rape for the purpose of the public funding of abortion; the prosecution of criminal violence against women; and workplace discrimination against women.

A six-week abortion ban, also called a "fetal heartbeat bill" by proponents, is a law in the United States which makes abortion illegal as early as six weeks gestational age, which is when proponents claim that a "fetal heartbeat" can be detected. Medical and reproductive health experts, including the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, say that the reference to a fetal heartbeat is medically inaccurate and misleading, for a conceptus is not called a fetus until eight weeks after fertilization, as well as that at four weeks after fertilization, the embryo has no heart, only a group of cells which will become a heart. Medical professionals advise that a true fetal heartbeat cannot be detected until around 17 to 20 weeks of gestation when the chambers of the heart have become sufficiently developed.

Abortion in Texas is illegal in most cases. There are nominally exceptions to save the mother's life, or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function", but the law on abortion in Texas is written in such an ambiguous way that life-threatening or harmful pregnancies do not explicitly constitute an exception. Attempts to clarify and codify these exceptions into law have been rejected by Republican lawmakers in Texas.

Abortion in Arkansas is illegal except when it is necessary to save the life of the pregnant individual. Doctors determined to have performed an abortion face up to 10 years in prison and fines up to $100,000.

Abortion in Kansas is legal. Kansas law allows for an abortion up to 20 weeks post-fertilization. After that point, only in cases of life or severely compromised physical health may an abortion be performed, with this limit set on the belief that a fetus can feel pain after that point in the pregnancy. In July 2024, the Kansas Supreme Court struck down two abortion restrictions.

Abortion in Mississippi is illegal. The new law took effect on July 7, 2022, after Mississippi State Attorney General Lynn Fitch certified on June 27, the Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on June 24 of that year. State Attorney General Lynn Fitch's certification made Mississippi's 2007 'trigger law' go into effect and ban all abortions in the state, “except in the case where necessary for the preservation of the mother's life or where the pregnancy was caused by rape".

Abortion in Ohio is legal up to the point of fetal viability as a result of abortion rights being placed into the Ohio State Constitution by November 2023 Ohio Issue 1.

References

  1. ↑ Rosenblatt, Lauren. "House passes bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks". Los Angeles Times .
  2. ↑ Pass abortion bill — science and basic human decency say these babies are worth saving (The Hill)
  3. 1 2 Hellmann, Jessie (26 September 2017). "House to vote on 20-week abortion ban". The Hill .
  4. ↑ "Clinton targeted in new abortion ad". Washington Examiner. 3 August 2016.
  5. ↑ Times, The Washington. "Senate blocks pain-capable abortion bill". The Washington Times.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Franks, Trent (4 October 2017). "Text - H.R.36 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act". www.congress.gov.
  7. ↑ Franks, Trent (19 June 2013). "H.R.1797 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act". www.congress.gov.
  8. ↑ "HR 1797 roll call vote".
  9. ↑ Pickert, Kate (18 June 2013). "House Passes 20-Week Abortion Ban". Time– via swampland.time.com.
  10. ↑ Graham, Lindsey (7 November 2013). "S.1670 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act". www.congress.gov.
  11. ↑ "FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 223".
  12. ↑ Huetteman, Emmarie (13 May 2015). "House Approves Revised Measure Banning Most Abortions After 20 Weeks". The New York Times .
  13. ↑ "U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 114th Congress - 1st Session". www.senate.gov.
  14. ↑ Mike DeBonis (2021-10-28) [2015-09-22]. "Senate Democrats block GOP bill banning late abortions". The Washington Post . Washington, D.C. ISSN   0190-8286. OCLC   1330888409.[ please check these dates ]
  15. ↑ Is the United States one of seven countries that ‘allow elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy?’ (Washington Post)
  16. ↑ "FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 549".
  17. ↑ Sophie Tatum (3 October 2017). "House passes ban on abortion after 20 weeks". CNN .
  18. ↑ "Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to ... -- Senate Vote #25 -- Jan 29, 2018". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2018-01-30.
  19. ↑ Abortion ban bill fails to advance in the Senate (Washington Post)
  20. 1 2 The most surprising part about the GOP's failed 20-week abortion ban push: It was popular
  21. ↑ Guess who likes the GOP's 20-week abortion ban? Women.
  22. ↑ JULY 2013 WASHINGTON POST-ABC NEWS POLL - NATIONAL POLITICS, TRAYVON MARTIN, HEALTH CARE
  23. 1 2 "A DEEPER LOOK AT VOTERS' OPINIONS ON 20-WEEK ABORTION BANS" (PDF).
  24. ↑ Sullivan, Peter (13 May 2015). "Hillary slams 20-week abortion ban". The Hill .
  25. ↑ Hallowell, Billy (July 24, 2016). "Did the Republican Party just adopt the 'most pro-life platform ever'?". The Herald News. Fall River, MA. Archived from the original on 2019-05-25. Retrieved April 13, 2024.—as archived via the Wayback Machine on May 25, 2019.
  26. ↑ Hohmann, James. "Pro-lifers' new litmus test for GOP". Politico .
  27. ↑ Rupert, Evelyn (16 September 2016). "Trump toughens anti-abortion stance". The Hill .
  28. ↑ "Why is the House planning to vote on a 20-week abortion ban?". ThinkProgress .
  29. ↑ Franks, Trent (31 July 2012). "Actions - H.R.3803 - 112th Congress (2011-2012): District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act". www.congress.gov.
  30. ↑ Service, Brandon Ross Cronkite News. "Franks' bill restricting abortions in DC fails". Arizona Daily Star.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.