Palembang pitis

Last updated
Palembang pitis
ڤيتس ڤلمبڠ
Palembang pitis.jpg
Some coins of Palembang pitis
Denominations
Superunit
250kupat
500cucuk
Demographics
Date of introduction1600s
Date of withdrawal1825
User(s) Palembang Sultanate

The Palembang pitis (also spelled pitjis) was a currency issued by the Palembang Sultanate from the 1600s until 1825 when the sultanate was dissolved and its territory taken over by the colonial government of the Dutch East Indies. [1] The currency consisted of low denomination tin alloy coins which were mostly traded in bulk. Due to the lack of a centralized mint, the pitis often had inconsistent manufacture and were frequently counterfeited.

Contents

History

Walled city of Palembang circa 1659. Bird's eye view of Palembang.JPG
Walled city of Palembang circa 1659.

Palembang, like Banten, had become an independent sultanate when Demak Sultanate declined following the death of Sultan Trenggana in 1546. Thereafter from the 1560s to 1620s, Palembang became an active trade participant in two key products of the region, pepper and tin. [2] During the course of this trade, coins from various local sultanates circulated in Palembang, namely Banten, Siak, Kampar and Jambi, in addition to Chinese cash coins which had already been circulating in the archipelago. Palembang's earliest coinage date from this period, which were tin imitation of Chinese cash with Chinese characters phonetically rendering "pangeran" or "sultan" into panglân (邦闌) [3] [4] [lower-alpha 1] and sútan (史丹) respectively, dated between 1600 and 1658. [4] [5] [6] This was followed by an issue with Arabic Jawi inscription reading 'alamat sulṭan (علامت سلطان), dated between 1658 and 1710. [7] The second half of the 17th century saw increasing monopoly of Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) in the pepper and tin trade. This severely undermined the regional trading network and undermined the prosperity of local sultanates. Local coins became scarce in Palembang, with the exception of coins minted at Palembang itself. [8] Beside the pitis, the early 1700s also saw the release of VOC duiten and Spanish dollar, which also circulated in Palembang. [9] [10]

Around 1710, tin deposits were discovered on Bangka Island, which was part of Palembang Sultanate at the time. [11] [12] The discovery led to a tin surplus which was traded in form of ingots by the sultanate and provided materials for low denomination coinage in mass quantity. The eighteenth century coinage of Palembang Sultanate consisted of two separate coin series. The first is the sultan's small-size coins bearing Jawi inscriptions, [13] and the second is larger-size coins bearing Chinese inscription. [14] The Chinese style coins, which were minted for the Chinese mining communities on Bangka are commonly thought to only circulate in Bangka. However, Bangka at the time had close ties with the administration of Palembang City and Chinese style coins appear to have also been minted in the city as well. It is very likely that the Chinese style coins circulated side by side with the sultan's coins within the core areas of Palembang. [10]

In 1812, Palembang lost its source of tin when British forces occupied Bangka Island. The island went on to become a nominal Dutch possession after the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1814 and was formally handed over to the Dutch in 1816. [15] Around 1820s, Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II rose up against the Dutch and was defeated by the Dutch general Hendrik Merkus de Kock in 1821. The Dutch divested Mahmud of his powers and exiled him to Ternate in the same year. In 1825, the Dutch took Palembang under direct Dutch administration. The last dated Palembang pitis was from 1804, and presumably further production ceased by 1825. [16] [17]

Manufacture

Palembang's output of coins had been fairly restrained before 1710, but tin surplus expanded the state's coinage. Pitis were cast in the same way as Chinese cash coins: molten tin was first cast into molds which resulted in "coin trees." Individual coins were then broken off and polished to round the edges, although stem remnants from unthorough polishing are commonly seen in Palembang pitis. Finally, a die is used to struck the coin with the appropriate inscription. [18] [19]

Official coinage issued by the Sultan formed only one part of the total coinage circulating in Palembang, as the manufacture of counterfeit coinage became a major industry. Counterfeit coins could have been made by almost anyone with access to Palembang's tin supply during the period of tin surplus. There are reports of severe punishment against counterfeiters, [20] but as the quality of official pitis themselves were often inconsistent due to lack of centralized manufacture, it may be difficult to ascertain whether a particular sample is official or unauthorized issue. [21] [19] Common inconsistencies include size, weight, and inscriptions (which were especially prone of deformation in early types).

Types

All currency of Palembang pitis consisted of coins made from tin-lead alloy, except for a single copper issue. Each type contain inscription on the obverse with blank reverse. Most contain the Arabic phrase في بلد ڤلمبڠ fi bilad Palembang ("in the land of Palembang") rendered in Jawi script, and some included year of mintage using Hijri era or Anno Hegirae (AH). Coins could be divided into two categories: coins without a hole called pitis buntu and coins with a hole called pitis teboh, [22] which included Chinese cash imitations. Disregarding variants, some of the known types produced by the official Palembang mint are as following: [23] [24] [13] [25] [26]

Pitis Buntu

InscriptionYear of mintageImageReigning Sultan
Jawi Romanization AH CE
ڤلمبڠ ? ? Palembang [lower-alpha 2] (circa 1750 [lower-alpha 3] or 1812–1816 [lower-alpha 4] ) Pitis buntu - Quistnix (2019) 01.jpg
ال سلطان في بلد ڤلمبڠ ؁١١٩٣al-Sulṭan fi bilad Palembang sanat 119311931779/80 Pitis buntu - Quistnix (2019) 02.jpg Muhammad Bahauddin (1776–1803)

Pitis Teboh

InscriptionYear of mintageImageReigning Sultan
Jawi Romanization AH CE
bānglán xīngbǎo (Mandarin) [lower-alpha 5]
panglân hengpó (Hokkien)
(circa 1600–1658) Palembang coin panglan hingpao.jpg
  • Pangeran Madi Angsoko (1595–1629), up to
  • Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman (1659-1706)
shǐdān lìbǎo (Mandarin) [lower-alpha 6]
sútan līpó (Hokkien)
(circa 1600–1658) Palembang coin shidan libao.jpg
  • Pangeran Madi Angsoko (1595–1629), up to
  • Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman (1659-1706)
علامت سلطان'alamat Sulṭan [lower-alpha 7] (circa 1658–1710) Palembang pitis (3).jpg
  • Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman(1659–1706), up to
  • Muhammad Mansyur Jayo Ing Lago (1706–1718)
ضرب في بلد ڤلمبڠ دار السلامḍarb fi bilad Palembang dar al-salam(circa 1710–1778) Pitis teboh - Quistnix (2019) 01.jpg
  • Muhammad Mansyur Jayo Ing Lago (1706–1718), up to
  • Muhammad Bahauddin (1776–1803)
علامت في بلد ڤلمبڠ دار السلام ؁١١٦٢'alamat fi bilad Palembang dar al-salam sanat 116211621749/50 Palembang alamat fi bilad 1162 coin.jpg Mahmud Badaruddin I Jayo Wikramo (1724–1757)
هذا فلوس في بلد ڤلمبڠ ؁١١٩٨hadha fulus fi bilad Palembang sanat 1198 [lower-alpha 8] 11981783/84 Palembang hadza fulus 1198 coin.jpg Muhammad Bahauddin (1776–1803)
ال سلطان في بلد ڤلمبڠ ؁al-Sulṭan fi bilad Palembang sanat (date)1200–12041785–1789/90 Palembang pitis (2).jpg Muhammad Bahauddin (1776–1803)
مصروف في بلد ڤلمبڠ ١٢١٩maṣruf fi bilad Palembang 121912191804/5 Palembang pitis (4).jpg Mahmud Badaruddin II (1804–1813, 1818–1821)

Exchange Rate

Palembang pitis served as low denomination currency valued and exchanged in bulks with the VOC duiten and Spanish dollar. Buntu and teboh were worth the same and they only differed in their group units. Pitis buntu were grouped into parcels wrapped in leaves. A parcel with 250 pieces is known as a kupat (كوفات) which has the value of one kejer equivalent to 20 duiten and 116 dollar. Pitis teboh were grouped into strings with a piece of rattan or twine, similar to Chinese cash. A string with 500 pieces is known as cucuk (چوچق) which has the value of one tali equivalent to two kejer. Known units of value and their exchange rate are shown below. [22] [30]

Palembang pitisVOC duitenSpanish dollar
UnitEquivalence# pieces
ريالreal2 jampel40003201
جمفلjampel2 suku200016012
سوكوsuku2 tali10008014
تاليtali2 kejer5004018
كجرkejer(1 kupat or 12 cucuk)25020116
--(12 kupat or 14 cucuk)12510132

See also

Notes

  1. Mitchiner (2012:35-36) identified the characters for "pangeran" as 邦㒷 and annotate them as pang lan. However, this seems to be a mistranscription, as the character (a simplified variant of ) is not known to have pronunciation similar to lan in any varieties of Chinese.
  2. The stylized lettering of this coin is difficult to read. The few writers who have reviewed this coin only agreed on the "Palembang" part. [27] [28]
  3. According to Robinson (2015).
  4. According to Mitchiner & Yih (2013:43)
  5. Mitchiner (2012:35) noted that some source attributed this coin to Cirebon, such as Millies (1871:53-54, Plate XV), but recent evidence suggests Palembang as the more likely issuer.
  6. Idem
  7. Mitchiner (2012:36) noted that some source attributed this coin to Jambi, such as Millies (1871:109), but recent evidence suggests Palembang as the more likely issuer.
  8. This is the only known type to have a copper issue. [29]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coin</span> Small, flat and usually round piece of material used as money

A coin is a small object, usually round and flat, used primarily as a medium of exchange or legal tender. They are standardized in weight, and produced in large quantities at a mint in order to facilitate trade. They are most often issued by a government. Coins often have images, numerals, or text on them. The faces of coins or medals are sometimes called the obverse and the reverse, referring to the front and back sides, respectively. The obverse of a coin is commonly called heads, because it often depicts the head of a prominent person, and the reverse is known as tails.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bangka Island</span> Island in Indonesia

Bangka is an island lying east of Sumatra, Indonesia. It is administered under the province of the Bangka Belitung Islands, being one of its namesakes alongside the smaller island of Belitung across the Gaspar Strait. The 9th largest island in Indonesia, it had a population of 1,146,581 at the 2020 census. It is the location of the provincial capital of Pangkal Pinang, and is administratively divided into four regencies and a city. The island itself and the surrounding sea suffers considerable environmental damage from its thriving tin mining industry which operates on- and offshore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duit</span> Coin

The duit is an old Dutch copper coin. It was manufactured in the territory of the Dutch Republic and became later an international currency. Its value was 1/8 stuiver.

The pitis was a currency of Brunei last issued in 1868 which circulated into the 20th century. It is also referred to as the picil by Antonio Pigafetta and some variants of it were referred to as the kue and the paku. It was later replaced by the Straits dollar in Brunei, which is valued at 4,000 pitis or 800 paku and at par with the Spanish dollar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Netherlands Indies guilder</span> Unit of account of the Dutch East Indies

The Netherlands Indies guilder was the unit of account of the Dutch East Indies from 1602 under the United East India Company, following Dutch practice first adopted in the 15th century. A variety of Dutch, Spanish and Asian coins were in official and common usage. After the collapse of the VOC at the end of the 18th century, control of the islands reverted to the Dutch government, which issued silver 'Netherlands Indies' guilder and fractional silver and copper coins until Indonesian independence in 1945.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japanese mon (currency)</span> Coins used from 1336 to 1891

The mon was the currency of Japan from the Muromachi period in 1336 until the early Meiji period in 1870. It co-circulated with the new sen until 1891. Throughout Japanese history, there were many styles of currency of many shapes, styles, designs, sizes and materials, including gold, silver, bronze, etc. The kanji for mon (文) also shares its name with Chinese wén, Korean mun, Vietnamese văn.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vietnamese cash</span> Cast round coin with square hole, currency of Vietnam from 970 to 1948

The cash, also called the sapek or sapèque, is a cast round coin with a square hole that was an official currency of Vietnam from the Đinh dynasty in 970 until the Nguyễn dynasty in 1945, and remained in circulation in North Vietnam until 1948. The same type of currency circulated in China, Japan, Korea, and Ryūkyū for centuries. Though the majority of Vietnamese cash coins throughout history were copper coins, lead, iron and zinc coins also circulated alongside them often at fluctuating rates. Coins made from metals of lower intrinsic value were introduced because of various superstitions involving Vietnamese people burying cash coins, as the problem of people burying cash coins became too much for the government. Almost all coins issued by government mints tended to be buried mere months after they had entered circulation. The Vietnamese government began issuing coins made from an alloy of zinc, lead, and tin. As these cash coins tended to be very fragile, they would decompose faster if buried, which caused the Vietnamese people to stop burying their coins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penny (British pre-decimal coin)</span> Former denomination of sterling coinage

The British pre-decimal penny was a denomination of sterling coinage worth 1240 of one pound or 112 of one shilling. Its symbol was d, from the Roman denarius. It was a continuation of the earlier English penny, and in Scotland it had the same monetary value as one pre-1707 Scottish shilling. The penny was originally minted in silver, but from the late 18th century it was minted in copper, and then after 1860 in bronze.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong one-mil coin</span> Obsolete Hong Kong coin

The one mil coin was the smallest denomination of the Hong Kong dollar from 1863 to 1866, after this date it was no longer issued but may have circulated much longer. Its value was one tenth of a cent, or a thousandth of a dollar. It was minted by the Royal Mint, it features the Royal cypher of "VR", of the reigning monarch Queen Victoria at the time, but didn't feature a profile of the face of the monarch as all other coins did, due to the hole in the middle.

<i>Tenpō Tsūhō</i> Japanese coin from the Edo period

The Tenpō Tsūhō was an Edo period coin with a face value of 100 mon, originally cast in the 6th year of the Tenpō era (1835). The obverse of the coin reads "Tenpō" a reference to the era this coin was designed in, and "Tsūhō" which means "circulating treasure" or currency. The Kaō is that of Gotō San'emon, a member of the Kinza mint's Gotō family, descendants of Gotō Shozaburo Mitsutsugu, a metalworker and engraver from Kyoto appointed by shōgun Tokugawa Ieyasu in 1600 to oversee the Edo mint of his shogunate and oversee its coinage. All mother coins were produced in Edo before they were sent to other mints where they would place the individual mint's mark on the edge of the coin. The coin circulated for 40 years, and stopped being produced during the Meiji Restoration after the introduction of the Japanese yen. Today these coins are now sold as "lucky charms" as well as being collected by numismatists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qing dynasty coinage</span> Historical coinage of China

Qing dynasty coinage was based on a bimetallic standard of copper and silver coinage. The Manchu-led Qing dynasty was established in 1636 and ruled over China proper from 1644 until it was overthrown by the Xinhai Revolution in 1912. The Qing dynasty saw the transformation of a traditional cash coin based cast coinage monetary system into a modern currency system with machine-struck coins, while the old traditional silver ingots would slowly be replaced by silver coins based on those of the Mexican peso. After the Qing dynasty was abolished its currency was replaced by the Chinese yuan of the Republic of China.

Mahmud Badaruddin I, also known as Jayo Wikramo, was the fourth regent of the Palembang Sultanate in Palembang, South Sumatra. Mahmud Badaruddin I reigned the Palembang Sultanate between 1724 and 1757.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaiyuan Tongbao</span> Historical Chinese currency

The Kaiyuan Tongbao, sometimes romanised as Kai Yuan Tong Bao or using the archaic Wade-Giles spelling K'ai Yuan T'ung Pao, was a Tang dynasty cash coin that was produced from 621 under the reign of Emperor Gaozu and remained in production for most of the Tang dynasty until 907. The Kaiyuan Tongbao was notably the first cash coin to use the inscription tōng bǎo (通寶) and an era title as opposed to have an inscription based on the weight of the coin as was the case with Ban Liang, Wu Zhu and many other earlier types of Chinese cash coins. The Kaiyuan Tongbao's calligraphy and inscription inspired subsequent Central Asian, Japanese, Korean, Ryūkyūan, and Vietnamese cash coins and became the standard until the last cash coin to use the inscription "通寶" was cast until the early 1940s in French Indochina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mother coin</span>

Mother coins, alternatively known as seed coins, matrix coins, or model coins (樣錢), were coins used during the early stages of the casting process to produce Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Ryukyuan, and Vietnamese cash coins. As cash coins were produced using sand casting mother coins were first produced to form the basis for all subsequent cash coins to be released into circulation. Under the Han dynasty in China mints started producing cash coins using bronze master moulds to solve inconsistencies in circulating coins, this only worked partially and by the sixth century mother coins were introduced to solve these inconsistencies almost completely. The Japanese adopted the usage of mother coins in the 600s and they were used to manufacture cast Japanese coins until the Meiji period. The mother coin was initially prepared by engraving a pattern with the legend of the cash coin which had to be manufactured. In the manufacturing process mother coins were used to impress the design in moulds which were made from easily worked metals such as tin and these moulds were then placed in a rectangular frame made from pear wood filled with fine wet sand, possibly mixed with clay, and enhanced with either charcoal or coal dust to allow for the molten metal to smoothly flow through, this frame would act as a layer that separates the two parts of the coin moulds. The mother coin was recovered by the people who cast the coins and was placed on top of the second frame and the aforementioned process was repeated until fifteen layers of moulds had formed based on this single mother coin. After cooling down a "coin tree" (錢樹) or long metallic stick with the freshly minted cash coins attached in the shape of "branches" would be extracted from the mould and these coins could be broken off and if necessary had their square holes chiseled clean, after this the coins were placed on a long metal rod to simultaneously remove the rough edges for hundreds of coins and then these cash coins could be strung together and enter circulation.

The one sen coin (一銭) was a Japanese coin worth one-hundredth of a Japanese yen, as 100 sen equalled 1 yen. One sen coins were first struck for circulation during the 6th year of Meiji's reign (1873) using a dragon design. The denomination had been adopted in 1871 but coinage at the time could not be carried out. Aside from an alloy change and a new rice stalk wreath design, one sen coins remained the same weight and size for the remainder of the era. The situation changed when World War I broke out under Emperor Taishō as rising metal costs led to a size and weight reduction. These smaller coins were first produced in 1916 with a paulownia design which was seen as liberal at the time. Emperor Shōwa took the throne in 1926, and Japan was pushed into a militaristic regime by the early 1930s causing metals to be set aside for wartime conditions. These effects would later impact one sen coins through numerous alloy, size, and design changes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cash coins in Indonesia</span> Historical coins in Indonesia

The cash coins of Indonesia was a historical currency in Indonesia based on Chinese imperial coinage during the Tang dynasty era. It was introduced by the Chinese traders, but did not become popular in Indonesia until Singhasari defeated the Mongol empire in 13th century. Chinese cash coins continued to circulate in Indonesian archipelago for centuries; when the Ming dynasty banned trade with the region, many local rulers started creating their own imitations of Chinese cash coins which were often thinner and of inferior quality. Cash coins produced in Indonesia were made from various materials such as copper-alloys, lead, and most commonly tin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indonesian numismatic charm</span> Decorative coins used for rituals

Indonesian numismatic charms, also known as Indonesian magic coins, are a family of coin-like objects based on a similar Chinese family of coin charms, amulets, and talismans but evolved independently from them. Indonesian numismatic charms tend to have been influenced a lot by Hinduism, Islam, and the native culture and often depict religious imagery from Hinduism for this reason. The "magic coins" and temple coins from Indonesia are largely based on the Chinese cash coins introduced to the region during the Tang dynasty era in China, and during the local Majapahit era they began circulating in the region. Unlike with Chinese numismatic charms, the coin charms of Indonesia have not been as well documented both historically and in the modern era. A major modern day work about Indonesian numismatic charms in English is Joe Cribb's Magic coins of Java, Bali, and the Malay Peninsula which is a catalogue based on the collection of coin-shaped charms from the island Java acquired by Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles during his lifetime held in the British Museum, the book is further supplemented with data and information available from various other sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daqian</span>

Daqian are large-denomination cash coins produced in the Qing dynasty starting from 1853 until 1890. Large denomination cash coins were previously used in earlier Chinese dynasties and had faced similar issues as 19th-century Daqian. The term referred to cash coins with a denomination of 4 wén or higher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hongqian</span> Chinese numismatic term

"Red cash coins" are the cash coins produced in Xinjiang under Qing rule following the conquest of the Dzungar Khanate by the Qing dynasty in 1757. While in Northern Xinjiang the monetary system of China proper, with standard cash coins, was adopted in Southern Xinjiang where the pūl (ﭘول) coins of Dzungaria circulated earlier, the pūl-system was continued but some of the old Dzungar pūl coins were melted down to make Qianlong Tongbao (乾隆通寶) cash coins. Because pūl coins were usually around 98% copper, they tended to be very red in colour which gave the cash coins based on the pūl coins the nickname "red cash coins".

References

  1. Hall 1968, pp. 576.
  2. Hall 1968, pp. 277–279.
  3. Hartill 2017, pp. 174.
  4. 1 2 Millies 1871, pp. 54.
  5. Mitchiner 2012, pp. 35–36.
  6. Yih 2010, pp. 27–31.
  7. Yih 2011.
  8. Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 31–32.
  9. Bucknill 1931, p. 15.
  10. 1 2 Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 32.
  11. Millies 1871, pp. 117.
  12. Wicks 1983, pp. 287–288.
  13. 1 2 Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 33–43.
  14. Mitchiner & Yih 2013b, pp. 29.
  15. Hall 1968, pp. 543, 576.
  16. Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 32–33.
  17. Mitchiner 1968, pp. 543, 576.
  18. Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 32, 35.
  19. 1 2 Robinson 2018, pp. 1.
  20. Millies 1871, pp. 110.
  21. Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 34, 35, 39.
  22. 1 2 Netscher & Chijs 1855, pp. 169.
  23. Netscher & Chijs 1855, pp. 167–170.
  24. Millies 1871, pp. 111–116.
  25. Robinson 2015.
  26. Gumilar 2021, p. 8-9.
  27. Millies 1871, pp. 114.
  28. Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 43.
  29. Mitchiner & Yih 2013a, pp. 39.
  30. Millies 1871, pp. 115–116.

Bibliography