Frederick the Great was the subject of many portraits. Many were painted during Frederick's life, and he would give portraits of himself as gifts. Almost all portraits of Frederick are idealized and do not reflect how he looked according to his death mask.[1] It has been suggested that the most accurate representation of Frederick may be the picture of a flautist from William Hogarth's series Marriage A-la-Mode.[2][3]
The king gave several of these pictures away as gifts in recognition of rendered services,[38] whether as life-size paintings, miniatures set with diamonds that were worn like medals, or representations on snuff boxes.[39] However, most portraits were produced for commercial reasons without being commissioned by the king, because there was a demand for his likeness from all of the courts of Europe. None of these official portraits show the real facial features of the monarch. Many comments from Frederick's contemporaries who met the king prove that his true appearance did not match his depictions in painted and engraved portraits.[40] For instance, in 1761, during a meeting with Frederick, Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim saw “a royal face that not a single painting depicts truthfully”.[41] For the chronicler Christoph Friedrich Nicolai it was clear: “[...] no portrait is like him.”[42] Consequently, in 1897, art historian Paul Seidel complained that no clear judgment could be derived from the surviving portraits as to what Frederick the Great really looked like.[43]
The French Rococo painter Antoine Pesne (1683–1757),[44] who worked at the Prussian court for many years and was appointed director of the Berlin Academy of Arts, chiefly depicted Frederick in his younger years, his earliest portrait being that of Frederick with his older sister, Wilhelmine, as children (c.1714–15).[45][46] Several times he painted the crown prince[47][48][49] and young king[50][51][52] in a representational style with smooth features. With some justification, critics accused Pesne of portraying all of his royal sitters equally beautifully and lacking any sharper characterization.[53][54] For instance, referring to Pesne’s 1740 portrait of Frederick, art historian Helmut Börsch-Supan writes that the artist “wasn't interested in a true portrayal of the character. Pesne painted Frederick the Great as he depicted beautiful women courting the admiration of their viewers. This is a feminine trait that makes it difficult to see the full personality in this portrait.”[55] Indeed, Pesne's idealized representations of Frederick do not correspond with a statement by the Austrian ambassador Friedrich Heinrich Graf von Seckendorff about the 14-year-old crown prince that he looked "old and stiff" at a young age and acted accordingly presumably because of the hardships imposed on him by his father.[56] This means that already in his younger years, Frederick “does not seem to have been a rather handsome boy”.[57] Significantly, even his father said, when the English royal family had asked him for a portrait of the crown prince, that they should have a large monkey painted because that was Frederick's likeness.[58]
Georg Wenzeslaus von Knobelsdorff seems to have invented a pictorial formula that depicted the crown prince in profile with a classically straightened nose,[59][60] which must have had an immense influence on countless later profile portraits of the king that were widely distributed through prints.[61] According to Börsch-Supan, the receding forehead, whose contour in side view is a straight continuation of the bridge of the nose, gives the face something bold and sharp, but is in strange contradiction to the full, somewhat drooping lower face and the beginnings of a double chin.[62]
In 1763 Johann Georg Ziesenis produced a "bourgeois" portrait of the king which has been claimed to be the only painting for which Frederick sat during his lifetime.[63] It was commissioned by Frederick's sister, Duchess Philippine Charlotte of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel.[64] However, more recent researchers have doubts as to whether the king actually sat for this painting from 17 to 20 June 1763 at Castle Salzdahlum,[65] especially since he had an aversion to being portrayed and the artist made Frederick's facial features look far too handsome.[66] Indeed, in 1763, at the end of the Seven Years' War, Frederick "complained in his letters of how much weight he had lost and how thin, fragile, and gray he had become."[67] For instance, in a letter to Sophie Caroline von Camas of March 6, 1763, he wrote: "You will see me again as an old man ... I'm as gray as a donkey, I lose a tooth every day and I'm half paralyzed from gout".[68] Ziesenis's portrait hardly agrees with this.[69]
When the French painter Charles-Amédée-Philippe van Loo stayed in Berlin from 1763 to 1769, he painted at least two portraits of the Prussian king, one of which has been in the royal collection in London since 1816.[70][71] According to Paul Seidel, the artist put the “stamp of unnatural” on these portraits of Frederick. “You can see at first glance that they are painted from memory and without a sitting.”[72]
Such images, based on Knobelsdorff's and Pesne's idealized portraiture, dominated both in painted and engraved form until the 1760s. However, after the Seven Years' War, the conception of Frederick portraits seems to have changed, now even allowing the depiction of individual shortcomings or the effects of experienced stress. At the same time, in connection with an intensive formation of legends about the military successes of the king, the emergence of an “age type” can be observed both in painting and sculpture.[73] By emphasizing the sharp nasolabial folds, the straight lines of the forehead and the bridge of the nose, the narrow mouth and the protruding eyes the artists created a type of image that art historian Helmut Börsch-Supan has characterized as “very Prussian in its expressive frugality to the point of scantiness.”[74]
A very popular depiction of Frederick in the new style is the portrait painted by Johann Heinrich Christian Franke in 1763/64, of which a number of variants exist.[75][76][77] It shows a bourgeois king holding up his tricorne in greeting. The monarch was well known for frequently saluting in public with his “cocked hat.”[78]
In 1767, Anton Friedrich König (1722-1787) was appointed royal court miniature portrait painter for Frederick the Great. In 1769, he produced a watercolour painting on ivory showing the king as an intellectual writer, historian and philosopher in front of his writing table, surrounded by the books in his library.[79][80][81]
In a gouache of 1772 by Daniel Chodowiecki the king is posed rather awkwardly in a slightly bent position on horseback, a representation that circulated in numerous copies[82][83] and engraved versions. A print after it was later used by Johann Caspar Lavater as an illustration for his Physiognomische Fragmente (1777), because the author was of the opinion that here "the Great, He himself, was riding past," as he believed he knew him from life.[84]
When in 1775 Frederick sent Voltaire the portrait that Anna Dorothea Therbusch had painted of him,[85][86][87] he ironically said: “In order not to dishonour her brush, she has adorned my contorted face with the grace of youth.”[88] Only a few years later, Therbusch's brother Christoph Friedrich Reinhold Lisiewski painted a portrait of the Prussian king that looks very different from his sister's,[89][90] which is all the more surprising given that the siblings often collaborated on their paintings.[91]
In 1781 Anton Graff painted Frederick the Great for the Prussian envoy in Dresden, Philipp Karl von Alvensleben. For this portrait and some later copies the monarch never sat. The artist is said to have observed the king from a distance when he attended a military parade and then made the picture from memory.[92][93][94] It shows a bourgeois-looking king and, in its concentration on the physiognomy, reflects Graff's portrait style more than a king's claim to representation.[95] Helmut Börsch-Supan assumes that Graff only corrected the facial features that he found “carved” in Franke's portrait in order to make them “more carnal, softer and human.”[96]
In the case of eighteenth-century portraits of monarchs, less importance was attached to the likeness of the sitters, and more to the political and social role in which they wanted to be represented in public. For example, they were shown as rulers with scepter and ermine cloak[97] or as competent military leaders, not what they looked like in their everyday life.[98][99] According to art historian Frauke Mankartz, the recognizable "brand" was more important than realism.[100] The king himself often said that his portraits did not resemble him,[101] and his contemporaries, including Emperor Joseph II,[102] were of the opinion that not a single painting depicted his face truthfully.[103]
Indeed, Frederick had a pronounced aversion to sitting for portraits, which he consistently refused because he was convinced that he was ugly. "You have to be Apollo, Mars or Adonis to be painted, but since I do not have the honour of resembling one of these gentlemen, I have withdrawn my face from the painters' brush as much as it depended on me," he wrote to Jean-Baptiste le Rond d'Alembert in 1774.[104] Furthermore, he said to the Marquis d’Argens: "There is so much talk about the fact that we terrestrial kings are made in the image of God. Then I look in the mirror and am obliged to say to myself: How unlucky for God!"[105] After extensive analysis of different types of Frederick portraits, Andrea M. Kluxen arrives at the conclusion that there is no realistic image that accurately depicts Frederick's (ugly) facial features.[106]
Possible portrait of Frederick the Great in The Toilette scene from Marriage A-la-Mode,[107] engraving by Simon François Ravenet after William Hogarth, 1745
The death mask of him, taken by John Eckstein on 17 August 1786,[108][109][110] demonstrates precisely what had led the king to his conviction that he was extremely ugly: Frederick had a prominently hooked nose and little else to make him look handsome.[111] This aquiline nose is not depicted in the official painted portraits. However, it is to be seen in a toned-down form in a print by Johann Georg Wille (1757)[112][113] and in a bust by Bartolomeo Cavaceppi (completed in 1770).[114][115] In her analysis of Frederick busts and statues, Saskia Hüneke also noticed that nearly all of them depict the nose in a relatively straight line. "In comparison, the wax pouring from the original form of the death mask does not show this line, so that it is more an ideal of the ancient Greek profile".[116]
Only one artist seems to have shown the Prussian king as he really was, namely with an extremely clear aquiline nose and playing the flute in front of a symbol of homosexuality: William Hogarth in scene 4 of his satirical series Marriage A-la-Mode. The picture is entitled The Toilette and was completed in 1744. Art historian Bernd Krysmanski argues that Hogarth must have learned about Frederick's facial features from the Prussian engraver Georg Friedrich Schmidt whom he had visited in Paris in 1743 while seeking engravers for the engraved version of Marriage A-la-Mode.[117][107] The features of the flautist depicted on the left of Hogarth's painting[118][119] bear a striking resemblance to the death mask of Frederick,[120] as does the face of the flautist in Simon François Ravenet's reversed engraving after Hogarth's painting (1745).[121]
In the nineteenth century, the king became a popular subject in historical paintings and prints. Adolph Menzel depicted events from the life of Frederick both in the wood-engravings to illustrate the Geschichte Friedrichs des Grossen by Franz Kugler[122][123] and in several of his paintings,[124] including Frederick the Great Playing the Flute at Sanssouci as the most famous work.[125] In these pictures he continues to avoid representing Frederick with a crooked nose,[126] although he must have known the death mask of the Prussian king.[127]
Art historian Helmut Börsch-Supan concludes: “The king's indifference to his portrait ... and the difficulty of capturing his physical appearance in a picture, due to the mobility of his mind, have meant that there is no truly valid portrait of him. The insatiable need of contemporaries and posterity to have his portrait before their eyes was thus given free rein to deform it in any direction.”[133]
Gallery
Portraits of Frederick the Great
Painting as 24-year-old Crown Prince of Prussia by Antoine Pesne, 1736
Frederick the Great with his Italian Greyhounds, bronze by Johann Gottfried Schadow, 1822
Statue of Frederick the Great in front of Schloss Charlottenburg, Berlin
Equestrian statue of Frederick the Great, Unter den Linden, Berlin. Bronze by Christian Daniel Rauch, 1851
Related Research Articles
Adolph Friedrich Erdmann von Menzel was a German Realist artist noted for drawings, etchings, and paintings. Along with Caspar David Friedrich, he is considered one of the two most prominent German painters of the 19th century, and was the most successful artist of his era in Germany. First known as Adolph Menzel, he was knighted in 1898 and changed his name to Adolph von Menzel.
Onno Klopp was a German historian, best known as the author of Der Fall des Hauses Stuart, the fullest existing account of the later Stuarts. He is also known as one of the few German historians who denigrated Frederick the Great.
Antoine Pesne was a French-born court painter of Prussia. Starting in the manner of baroque, he became one of the fathers of rococo in painting. His work represents a link between the French school and the Frederican rococo style.
The Toilette, called The countess's morning levee on the frame, is the fourth canvas in the series of six satirical paintings known as Marriage A-la-Mode painted by William Hogarth.
The Prussian Academy of Arts was a state arts academy first established in Berlin, Brandenburg, in 1694/1696 by prince-elector Frederick III, in personal union Duke Frederick I of Prussia, and later king in Prussia.
Bernhard Rode was a Prussian artist and engraver well known for portraying historical scenes and allegorical works. He knew most of the central figures in the Berlin Enlightenment as Friedrich Nicolai and Gotthold Lessing, and the philosophical and political discussions of the Berlin Philosophs informed much of the subject matter of his artistic work. His paintings include several works depicting, in various guises, the King of Prussia Frederick the Great, who ruled the Prussia during much of Rode's lifetime. Rode was director of the Berlin Academy of the Arts from 1783 until his death in 1797.
Georg Friedrich Schmidt was a German engraver, etcher and pastel painter, in the Rococo style.
The Kupferstichkabinett, or Museum of Prints and Drawings, is a prints museum in Berlin, Germany. It is part of the Berlin State Museums, and is located in the Kulturforum on Potsdamer Platz. It is the largest museum of graphic art in Germany, with more than 500,000 prints and around 110,000 individual works on paper.
The equestrian statue of Frederick the Great on Unter den Linden avenue in Berlin's Mitte district commemorates King Frederick II of Prussia. Created from 1839 to 1851 by Christian Daniel Rauch, it is a masterpiece of the Berlin school of sculpture, marking the transition from neoclassicism to realism. The bronze statue shows "The Old Fritz" dressed in military uniform, ermine coat and tricorne hat on horseback above the leading generals, statesmen, artists and scientist of his time. Walled in during World War II, it was disassembled by East Germany in 1950, reassembled in Sanssouci Park in 1963, and returned to its original location in 1980.
Friedrich Wilhelm Quirin von Forcade de Biaix, baptized Quirin Frideric de Forcade, aka Friedrich Quirin von Forcade, aka Frédéric Quérin de Forcade, was a Kingdom of Prussia Lieutenant General, the second son of Jean de Forcade de Biaix, an early Huguenot immigrant to Brandenburg-Prussia and a descendant of the noble family of Forcade. He was one of Frederick the Great's most active and most treasured officers. He was wounded three times and once left for dead on the battlefield. Together with his wife, he fathered 23 children.
Friedrich Wilhelm von Forcade de Biaix, aka Frideric Guillaume de Forcade was a Royal Prussian Colonel, Schwadronschef of the 2nd Grenadier Company in the 24th Prussian Infantry Regiment, recipient of the Kingdom of Prussia's highest military order of merit for heroism, Knight of the Order of Pour le Mérite (1774), Commandant of Frankfurt/Oder, and Presbyter of the French congregation of Frankfurt/Oder.
The Portrait of Frederick II of Prussia by Johann Georg Ziesenis is a portrait of Frederick the Great painted by the German-Danish painter Johann Georg Ziesenis in 1763. In 1913, the archivist and historian Jean Lulvès (1866–1928), son of the painter Jean Lulvès, claimed it was the only painting for which Frederick sat during his lifetime. However, this is now doubted.
Friedrich Wilhelm Weidemann or Wiedemann was a German painter. From 1702 he worked as court painter to Frederick William I, prince and later king of Prussia. He also produced portraits of several other members of the Prussian royal family
Frederick the Great Playing the Flute at Sanssouci or The Flute Concert is an 1852 oil on canvas history painting by the German painter Adolph Menzel. It depicts Frederick the Great, King of Prussia playing the flute at an evening concert at Sanssouci and is now in the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin.
Johann Christof Merck, or Merk was a German painter who specialized in uniformed portraits and animals.
The Great Enclosure or The Ostra Enclosure (Ostra-Gehege) is an 1831 oil-on-canvas painting by Caspar David Friedrich, now in the collection of the Albertinum of the Galerie Neue Meister in Dresden.
It is almost certain that Prussian King Frederick the Great (1712–1786) was primarily homosexual, and that his sexual orientation was central to his life. However, the nature of his actual relationships remains speculative.
Georg Wilhelm von der Marwitz, also known as Black Marwitz, was a Prussian major, quartermaster, and adjutant to Frederick II of Prussia.
Departure of King Wilhelm I for the Army, July 31, 1870 is an oil on canvas painting by German artist Adolph Menzel, created in 1871. It depicts a scene that takes place in the avenue Unter den Linden, in Berlin, where a crowd is paying tribute to King Wilhelm I of Prussia, as he passes in an open carriage, on his way to the Franco-Prussian War, who had started two weeks earlier. The painting is part of the collection of the Alte Nationalgalerie, in Berlin, since 1881.
Laying out the March Dead is an 1848 painting by the German artist Adolph Menzel. It shows a crowd of people on Berlin's Gendarmenmarkt. The figures are attending the Coffin Laying of civilians who died during the Berlin March Revolution. Menzel attended the ceremony and during the event - or shortly afterward - he began work on the first studies for the painting. The lower left corner of the painting is not executed in oil paint, which is why most scholars consider it to be unfinished. Art historians disagree about the possible political or aesthetic motives of the painter for this. The painting belongs to the group of revolutionary paintings that were rarely created in Germany.
References
↑ Arnold Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen: Zeitgenössische Darstellungen, 2nd edition (Berlin: Nibelungen-Verlag, 1942), pp. 140–142 and plates 65–69.
↑ Bernd Krysmanski, Does Hogarth Depict Old Fritz Truthfully with a Crooked Beak? – The Pictures Familiar to Us from Pesne to Menzel Don’t Show This, ART-dok (University of Heidelberg: arthistoricum.net, 2022). doi:10.11588/artdok.00008019
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 91–94, 96–98, 105–106, 107–115 and plates 5–8, 12–15, 25–26, 28–35.
↑ Helmut Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, in Oswald Hauser (ed.), Friedrich der Grosse in seiner Zeit (Cologne and Vienna: Böhlau, 1987), pp. 260–261, 263, 264–266 and figs. 3, 4, 7, 9, 10.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 99–105 and plates 16–22.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, pp. 262–263 and figs. 5–6.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 118–121 and plates 38–39.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, p. 266 and fig. 12.
↑ Karin Schrader, Der Bildnismaler Johann Georg Ziesenis (1717–1776): Leben und Werk mit kritischem Oeuvrekatalog (Münster: LIT, 1995), pp. 101–119.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 133–135 and plates 59–60.
↑ Ekhart Berckenhagen, Anton Graff: Leben und Werk (Berlin: Deutscher Verlag für Kunstwissenschaft, 1967), p. 19.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, pp. 255–257 and fig. 1.
↑ Andrea M. Kluxen, Bild eines Königs: Friedrich der Große in der Graphik (Limburg an der Lahn: C. A. Starke, 1986), pp. 65, 69, 70, 76, 79, 81 and figs. 5, 7, 13.
↑ The British Museum: Georg Friedrich Schmidt, Fredericus III Rex Borussiae, engraved portrait of Frederick II of Prussia as Frederick III Elector of Brandenburg, 1743.
↑ Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Kupferstich-Kabinett: Georg Friedrich Schmidt, Frederick II, King of Prussia, engraving, 1746.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 126–128, 131–132 and plates 48–50, 56.
↑ Kluxen, Bild eines Königs: Friedrich der Große in der Graphik, pp. 50, 52, 55–56, 85, 95, 100, 105-123, 128–129, 131.
↑ Rainer Michaelis, “Friedrich der Große im Spiegel der Werke des Daniel Nikolaus Chodowiecki,” in Friederisiko: Friedrich der Große, exh. cat., Stiftung Preußische Schlösser und Gärten Berlin-Brandenburg, 2 vols (Munich: Hirmer, 2012), Die Essays, pp.262–271.
↑ Frauke Mankartz: "Die Marke Friedrich: Der preußische König im zeitgenössischen Bild," in Friederisiko: Friedrich der Große: Die Ausstellung, exh. cat., Stiftung Preußische Schlösser und Gärten Berlin-Brandenburg, 2012 (Munich: Hirmer, 2012), pp. 210–215.
↑ See the many commentaries cited in Krysmanski, "Voices from the 18th century prove it: The truth was very different", in Does Hogarth Depict Old Fritz Truthfully with a Crooked Beak? – The Pictures Familiar to Us from Pesne to Menzel Don’t Show This, pp. 10–13. doi:10.11588/artdok.00008019
↑ Letter of 8 January 1761 to Karl Wilhelm Ramler, cited in Gustav Berthold Volz, Friedrich der Grosse im Spiegel seiner Zeit, vol. 3 (Berlin: Verlag von Reimar Hobbing, 1901), p. 40.
↑ Briefe über die Kunst von und an Herrn von Hagedorn (Leipzig, 1797), p. 243, cited in Paul Seidel, "Die Bildnisse Friedrichs des Großen", Hohenzollern-Jahrbuch, 1 (1897), p. 107.
↑ Paul Seidel: "Die äußere Erscheinung Friedrichs des Großen," Hohenzollern-Jahrbuch, 1 (1897), p. 87.
↑ See Gerd Bartoschek, Antoine Pesne, 1683–1757: Ausstellung zum 300. Geburtstag (Potsdam-Sanssouci: Generaldirektion der Staatlichen Schlösser und Gärten, 1983).
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 91–92 and plates 5–6.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, p. 115.
↑ See also Paul Seidel, Friedrich der Grosse und die bildende Kunst (Leipzig and Berlin: Giesecke & Devrient, 1922), pp. 186–187.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, p. 265.
↑ Paul Seidel, “Die Kinderbildnisse Friedrichs des Großen und seiner Brüder”, Hohenzollern-Jahrbuch, 15 (1911), p. 29.
↑ Krysmanski, Does Hogarth Depict Old Fritz Truthfully with a Crooked Beak? – The Pictures Familiar to Us from Pesne to Menzel Don’t Show This, p. 10. doi:10.11588/artdok.00008019
↑ Johannes Kunisch, Friedrich der Große: Der König und seine Zeit (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2004), p. 27.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, p. 262 and fig. 5.
↑ Jean Lulvès, Das einzige glaubwürdige Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen als König (Hanover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung, 1913).
↑ August Fink, “Herzogin Philippine Charlotte und das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen,” Braunschweigisches Jahrbuch, 40 (1959), pp. 117–135.
↑ See Karin Schrader, Der Bildnismaler Johann Georg Ziesenis (1717–1776): Leben und Werk mit kritischem Oeuvrekatalog (Münster: LIT, 1995), pp. 101–119.
↑ According to Arnold Hildebrand, it speaks against the fact that the king granted the painter a session, that "the picture does not correspond to the image of him that we have in our heads based on the reports of the man who was almost crushed by fate. ... Ziesenis has portrayed the king in a physically flattering manner", and he shows the 52-year-old "healthy, well-preserved, good-natured and jovial." See Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, p. 119.
↑ Helmut Börsch-Supan, “Die Bildnisse des Königs,” in Friedrich Benninghoven, Helmut Börsch-Supan and Iselin Gundermann (eds.), Friedrich der Grosse: Ausstellung des Geheimen Staatsarchivs Preußischer Kulturbesitz anläßlich des 200. Todestages König Friedrich II. von Preußen (Berlin: Geheimes Staatsarchiv Preußischer Kulturbesitz, 1986), p. XIII.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 121–123 and plates 40–42.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, pp. 257–258 and fig. 2.
↑ Johann Caspar Lavater, Physiognomische Fragmente, zur Beförderung von Menschenkenntniß und Menschenliebe (Leipzig and Winterthur: Weidmanns Erben & Reich; Heinrich Steiner & Compagnie, 1777), Dritter Versuch, p. 348.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 132–133 and plates 57– 58.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, p. 267 and fig. 14.
↑ Cited by Frauke Mankartz, “Die Marke Friedrich: Der preußische König im zeitgenössischen Bild,” in Friederisiko: Friedrich der Große, exh. cat., Stiftung Preußische Schlösser und Gärten Berlin-Brandenburg (Munich: Hirmer, 2012), Die Ausstellung, p. 209.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, pp. 267–270 and fig. 15.
↑ See Gerd Bartoschek, “Gemeinsam stark? Anna Dorothea Therbusch und ihre Zusammenarbeit mit Christoph Friedrich Reinhold Lisiewsky”, in Helmut Börsch-Supan and Wolfgang Savelsberg (eds.), Christoph Friedrich Reinhold Lisiewsky (1725–1794) (Berlin and Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2010), pp. 77–84.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 133–135 and plates 59–60.
↑ Ekhart Berckenhagen, Anton Graff: Leben und Werk (Berlin: Deutscher Verlag für Kunstwissenschaft, 1967), p. 19.
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis”, pp. 255–257 and fig. 1.
↑ Ernst H. Kantorowicz, The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957)
↑ Claudia Breger, "A Hybrid Emperor: The Poetics of National Performance in Kantorowicz's Biography of Frederick II," Colloquia Germanica, 35, nos. 3–4 (2002), pp. 287–310.
↑ Mankartz, "Die Marke Friedrich: Der preußische König im zeitgenössischen Bild," p. 210.
↑ In 1772, he wrote to Voltaire: "You will know that … neither my portraits nor my medals are like me." Cited in Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, p. 135.
↑ In 1769, Joseph II wrote to his mother Maria Theresa about the Prussian King he had met in Neisse: "He does not resemble any of the pictures you have seen of him ." Letter dated 29 August 1769, cited in Gustav Berthold Volz, Friedrich der Grosse im Spiegel seiner Zeit, vol. 2: Siebenjähriger Krieg und Folgezeit bis 1778 (Berlin: Reimar Hobbing, 1901), p. 213.
↑ Andrea M. Kluxen, Bild eines Königs: Friedrich der Große in der Graphik (Limburg an der Lahn: C. A. Starke, 1986), p. 34.
1 2 Bernd Krysmanski, Das einzig authentische Porträt des Alten Fritz? Is the only true likeness of Frederick the Great to be found in Hogarth's 'Marriage A-la-Mode'? (Dinslaken, 2015), pp. 27-33, 55-58.
↑ Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen, pp. 140–142 and plates 65–69.
↑ Michael Hertl, Totenmasken: Was vom Leben und Sterben bleibt (Stuttgart: Jan Thorbecke, 2002), pp. 159–163.
↑ According to art historian Bernd Krysmanski, "Frederick the Great disliked his own features. … Most of his portraits disgusted him. The reason was simple: he was convinced that he was ugly", because he had "a prominently hooked and aquiline nose, and little else to recommend him to connoisseurs of classical ideals of good looks". See Krysmanski, "Frederick the Great’s lack of good looks", in Das einzig authentische Porträt des Alten Fritz? Is the only true likeness of Frederick the Great to be found in Hogarth's 'Marriage A-la-Mode'? (Dinslaken, 2015), p. 46.
↑ Kluxen, Bild eines Königs: Friedrich der Große in der Graphik, pp. 76, 79 and fig. 13.
↑ Krysmanski, Das einzig authentische Porträt des Alten Fritz? Is the only true likeness of Frederick the Great to be found in Hogarth's 'Marriage A-la-Mode'?, ill. p. 28.
↑ Françoise Forster-Hahn, "Adolph Menzel's 'Daguerreotypical' Image of Frederick the Great: A Liberal Bourgeois Interpretation of German History," Art Bulletin, 59, no. 2 (June 1977), pp. 242–261.
↑ Kathrin Maurer, "Franz Kugler and Adolph Menzel's History of Frederick the Great (1842)," in Visualizing the Past: The Power of the Image in German Historicism (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2013), pp. 118–144
↑ Hubertus Kohle, Adolph Menzels Friedrich-Bilder: Theorie und Praxis der Geschichtsmalerei im Berlin der 1850er Jahre (Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2001).
↑ Jost Hermand, Adolph Menzel: Das Flötenkonzert in Sanssouci: Ein realistisch geträumtes Preußenbild (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch, 1985).
↑ Several death masks hung on Menzel's studio wall, including that of the Prussian king. See Gisela Hopp, "Menzels 'Atelierwand' als Bildträger von Gedanken über Kriegsnot und Machtmissbrauch," Jahrbuch der Berliner Museen, 41 (1999), supplement, pp. 131–138.
↑ Klaus Gehrmann, Dariusz Kacprzak and Jürgen Klebs (eds.), Friedrich der Große, Johann Gottfried Schadow, aus der Sammlung des Muzeum Narodowe w Szczecinie (Berlin: Schriftenreihe der Schadow Gesellschaft Berlin e.V., vol. XIV, 2011).
↑ Frank Pieter Hesse and Gesine Sturm (eds.), Ein Denkmal für den König: Das Reiterstandbild für Friedrich II. Unter den Linden in Berlin / A Monument for the King: The Equestrian Statue of King Friedrich II on the Boulevard Unter den Linden in Berlin (Berlin: Schelzky & Jeep, 2001).
↑ Wieland Giebel (ed.), Das Reiterdenkmal Friedrichs des Großen, enthüllt am 31. Mai 1851 (Berlin: Berlin-Story-Verlag, 2007).
↑ Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis,” p. 269.
Bibliography
Helmut Börsch-Supan, “Friedrich der Große im zeitgenössischen Bildnis,” in Oswald Hauser (ed.), Friedrich der Grosse in seiner Zeit (Cologne and Vienna: Böhlau, 1987), pp.255–270.
Edwin von Campe, Die graphischen Porträts Friedrichs des Großen aus seiner Zeit und ihre Vorbilder (Munich: Bruckmann, 1958).
Paul Dehnert, “Daniel Chodowiecki und der König”, Jahrbuch Preussischer Kulturbesitz, 14 (1977), 307–319.
Françoise Forster-Hahn, “Adolph Menzel’s ‘Daguerreotypical’ Image of Frederick the Great: A Liberal Bourgeois Interpretation of German History,” Art Bulletin, 59, no. 2 (June 1977), pp. 242–261.
Gunther Hahn and Alfred Kernd’l, Friedrich der Grosse im Münzbildnis seiner Zeit (Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein Verlag; Berlin: Propyläen Verlag, 1986).
Arnold Hildebrand, Das Bildnis Friedrichs des Großen: Zeitgenössische Darstellungen, 2nd edition (Berlin: Nibelungen-Verlag, 1942).
Saskia Hüneke, “Friedrich der Grosse in der Bildhauerkunst des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts,” Jahrbuch/Stiftung Preußische Schlösser und Gärten Berlin-Brandenburg, 2 (1997–1998) (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2001), pp.59–91.
Andrea M. Kluxen, Bild eines Königs: Friedrich der Große in der Graphik (Limburg/Lahn: C. A. Starke, 1986).
Hubertus Kohle, Adolph Menzels Friedrich-Bilder: Theorie und Praxis der Geschichtsmalerei im Berlin der 1850er Jahre (Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2001).
Bernd Krysmanski, Does Hogarth Depict Old Fritz Truthfully with a Crooked Beak? – The Pictures Familiar to Us from Pesne to Menzel Don’t Show This, ART-dok (University of Heidelberg: arthistoricum.net, 2022). doi:10.11588/artdok.00008019
Frauke Mankartz, “Die Marke Friedrich: Der preußische König im zeitgenössischen Bild,” in Friederisiko: Friedrich der Große, exh. cat., Stiftung Preußische Schlösser und Gärten Berlin-Brandenburg, 2 vols (Munich: Hirmer, 2012), Die Ausstellung, pp.204–221.
Rainer Michaelis, “Friedrich der Große im Spiegel der Werke des Daniel Nikolaus Chodowiecki,” in Friederisiko: Friedrich der Große, exh. cat., Stiftung Preußische Schlösser und Gärten Berlin-Brandenburg, 2 vols (Munich: Hirmer, 2012), Die Essays, pp.262–271.
Martin Schieder, “Die auratische Abwesenheit des Königs: Zum schwierigen Umgang Friedrichs des Großen mit dem eigenen Bildnis,” in Bernd Sösemann/Gregor Vogt-Spira (eds.), Friedrich der Große in Europa: Geschichte einer wechselvollen Beziehung, 2 vols (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2012), vol. 1, pp.325–338.
Paul Seidel, “Die Bildnisse Friedrichs des Großen,” Hohenzollern-Jahrbuch, 1 (1897), pp.87–112.
Paul Seidel, Friedrich der Grosse und die bildende Kunst (Leipzig and Berlin: Giesecke & Devrient, 1922).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.