R v Incedal

Last updated

R v Incedal and Rarmoul-Bouhadjar
Court Central Criminal Court, Court of Appeal
Transcript(s) Court of Appeal decision on trial secrecy

R v Incedal and Rarmoul-Bouhadjar (2014), formerly known as R v AB and CD, is a criminal case brought in the United Kingdom against two people suspected of terrorism offences. It was proposed to make it the first criminal trial in British legal history to be held entirely in secret, but the Court of Appeal of England and Wales ruled in June 2014 that some details of the trial should be made public.

Contents

Background

The existence of the prosecutions became publicly known on 4 June 2014, as the outcome of an application by The Guardian [1] to the Court of Appeal of England and Wales to overturn a ban on publicly identifying the defendants, which had been issued the month before. The style of cause for the daylight order is Guardian News and Media Ltd v AB and CD. [1] At the earlier closed hearing, Mr Justice Nicol had granted the Crown an order that the trial "should take place entirely in private with the identity of both defendants withheld" and with "a permanent prohibition on reporting what takes place during the trial and their identities". [2] The Crown Prosecution Service had argued that they would be deterred from bringing the prosecution without an order for secrecy. The basis for this argument was not made public. [3]

On 12 June 2014, Lord Justice Peter Gross, Mr Justice Simon and Mr Justice Burnett issued a ruling overturning the order with respect to the anonymity of the defendants and limiting the degree to which the trial could be heard in private. The ruling stated:

We express grave concern as to the cumulative effects of holding a criminal trial in camera and anonymising the defendants. We find it difficult to conceive of a situation where both departures from open justice will be justified. Suffice to say, we are not persuaded of any such justification in the present case. [4]

The "core of the trial" remains secret, but the identities of the defendants and the outcome of the trial were ordered to be made public, as well as some details of opening remarks by the judge and prosecution. The court trying the case will have discretion to admit journalists to some parts of the trial, but will retain their notes until the end of the trial, when the court will review what content should or should not be allowed to be made public. [4] [5]

The Crown Prosecution Service indicated that it did not intend to make any further appeal, and that the trial would go ahead. [6]

The trial was due to begin in London on 16 June 2014, but was rescheduled for October 2014. [7] [8]

Arrests and charges

The defendants, Erol Incedal (initially known as AB) and Mounir Rarmoul-Bouhadjar (CD), were arrested on Mansell Street, Tower Hamlets, on 13 October 2013 at 7 pm. Two further arrests were made as part of the same operation, one in Peckham and the other in Notting Hill, but neither resulted in charges. [9] [10] It was said in court during the appeal by The Guardian that the defendants were arrested "under high profile circumstances". [11]

Incedal is charged under s 5(1) of the Terrorism Act 2006 with making preparations for terrorist activity between February 2012 and October 2013. Rarmoul-Bouhadjar is charged with possession of an improperly obtained passport under the Identity Documents Act 2010. Both defendants are charged under s 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 with possessing documents likely to be useful in the commission of terrorist activity (this has been alleged to refer to a document titled "bomb-making"). [3]

Early reaction

In early June 2014, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Chris Grayling defended the order for secrecy, [12] saying: "If it is in the interests of justice for the judge to take a decision one way or the other, so be it, that's why we have them. That's why we trust the judges." [7] The home secretary, Theresa May, and the foreign secretary, William Hague, had both submitted certificates requesting the trial to be held in total secrecy. [13] The order was criticised by Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty for its "extensive restrictions set without robust reasons or a time limit". [7]

Questions about the effect of holding a secret trial were asked by Sadiq Khan, the Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, [14] and Keith Vaz the Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee. [15]

The Daily Telegraph's Philip Johnston likened the trial to the Inquisition and the Star Chamber. [16] Columnist Jenny McCartney pointed out that over three decades of terrorism in Northern Ireland, a criminal trial had never before been conducted in absolute secrecy. [17] Melanie Phillips argued that holding the trial in total secrecy was justified. [18]

On 12 June 2014 Conservative MP Dominic Raab asked for a debate in the Commons over a bid to hold a terror trial in complete secrecy. The former Foreign Office lawyer, who had worked with the intelligence services, said that even after the ruling to lift some of the restrictions, only "hand-picked" journalists would be allowed to cover the trial. [19]

Trials

One of the two defendants, Mounir Rarmoul-Bouhadjar, aged 26, pleaded guilty the week of 6 October 2014 to the possession of a terrorist document. [20]

First trial

The other defendant, Erol Incedal, also aged 26, denied two charges at the Old Bailey in London on 14 October 2014: one offence of preparing acts of terrorism and the other offence of possessing a document entitled Bomb Making. The charges stem from examination of objects in the possession of Incedal, who was arrested while driving a black Mercedes. A paper was found hidden amongst his possessions which listed the residential address of Tony Blair. [20]

On 31 October 2014, Incedal denied terrorism offences, saying he had contemplated committing an armed robbery or buying heroin or a gun instead. [21]

On 11 November 2014 it was reported that, for undisclosed reasons, the trial jury had been discharged but that a retrial would be sought. [22]

On 17 November 2014, the jury convicted Incedal on the charge of possession of terrorist information, but the jury failed to reach a verdict on another charge of preparing an act of terrorism. [23]

Re-trial

On 26 March 2015, Incedal was acquitted by the jury on the charge of preparing an act of terrorism. The details of Incedal's successful defence remain subject to secrecy. [24]

A small part of the trial was heard in the presence of ten accredited journalists, and a small proportion in open court. In December 2015 transcripts detailing part of Incedal's defence were released. A challenge in the High Court was made by the news media, citing the principle of open justice. The lord chief justice was expected to rule on the media challenge in January 2016., [25] the ruling came through on 9 February and the gagging order was upheld. [26]

Reactions

On 12 November 2014, Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, says clearer rules are needed to prevent major trials being heard entirely in secret. [27]

Henry Irving and Judith Townend conclude that there is a need for coherence across cases. They note how 'information control measures should be uniform and cover all sources of news. In situations like the Incedal case, clearer rules were needed to protect the public interest in freedom of expression and access to criminal trials.' [28]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abu Hamza al-Masri</span> Egyptian-born British Islamist terrorist incarcerated in a US federal prison

Mustafa Kamel Mustafa, also known as Abu Hamza al-Masri, or simply Abu Hamza, is an Egyptian cleric who was the imam of Finsbury Park Mosque in London, England, where he preached Islamic fundamentalist views. In 2004, Hamza was arrested by British police after the United States requested he be extradited to face charges. He was later charged by British authorities with sixteen offences for inciting violence and racial hatred. In 2006, a British court found him guilty of inciting violence, and sentenced him to seven years' imprisonment. On 5 October 2012, after an eight-year legal battle, he was extradited from the UK to the United States to face terrorism charges and on 14 April 2014 his trial began in New York. On 19 May 2014, Hamza was found guilty of eleven terrorism charges by a jury in Manhattan. On 9 January 2015, he was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is the office or official charged with the prosecution of criminal offences in several criminal jurisdictions around the world. The title is used mainly in jurisdictions that are or have been members of the Commonwealth of Nations.

<i>ABC trial</i> 1978 United Kingdom criminal trial

The ABC Trial was a United Kingdom trial conducted in the 1970s, of three men for offences under Section 2 and of one of these men, a scholarly journalist, for an offence under Section 1 of the Official Secrets Act 1911. The men were two libertarian journalists of a similar political viewpoint as much of the Labour government, and a resigned GCHQ source seeking to heighten scrutiny of government-authorised wire-tapping and limit the work of the American espionage agency, the CIA, in Britain. These aims were furthered in the following two decades achieved through detailed parliamentary scrutiny into and regular reports as to the work of security services, a Freedom of Information Committee and regulation of wire-tapping. Aside from very limited reportage from the Central Criminal Court, its early analysis comes in the account of one of its investigative-journalist defendants, Duncan Campbell, in the annual journal Socialist Register.

United Kingdom has taken many forms of censorship throughout the history of the country, with either various stringent and lax laws in place at different times, especially concerning British cinema, entertainment venues, literature, the monarchy and the press. In a specific sense, the concept of free speech generally does not exist as a fundamental right within the country. British citizens have a negative right to freedom of expression under the common law. In 1998, the United Kingdom incorporated the European Convention into its domestic law under the Human Rights Act, although a repeal has been proposed, with a replacement known as the Bill of Rights Bill 2022 announced with draft text on 22 June 2022.

Diplock courts were criminal courts in Northern Ireland for non-jury trial of specified serious crimes. They were introduced by the Northern Ireland Act 1973 and used for political and terrorism-related cases during the Troubles. The Justice and Security Act 2007 ended the automatic use of non-jury trials for scheduled offences but they are still used in Northern Ireland upon certification by the Director of Public Prosecutions on a case-by-case basis.

The Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial began on 3 May 2000, 11 years, 4 months and 13 days after the destruction of Pan Am Flight 103 on 21 December 1988. The 36-week bench trial took place at a specially convened Scottish Court in the Netherlands set up under Scots law and held at a disused United States Air Force base called Camp Zeist near Utrecht.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abu Qatada al-Filistini</span> Islamic cleric, alleged al-Qaeda member (born 1959)

Omar Mahmoud Othman, better known as Abu Qatada al-Filistini, is a Salafi cleric and Jordanian national. Abu Qatada was accused of having links to terrorist organisations and frequently imprisoned in the United Kingdom without formal charges or prosecution before being deported to Jordan, where courts found him innocent of multiple terrorism charges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a wide-ranging measure introduced to modernise many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Large portions of the act were repealed and replaced by the Sentencing Act 2020.

Babar Ahmad is a British Muslim of Pakistani descent who spent eight years in prison without trial in the United Kingdom from 2004 to 2012 fighting extradition to the United States. The US accused him of providing material support to terrorism via a website that he set up in the UK in 1996 to publish stories about the conflicts in Bosnia and Chechnya, but which in 2000–2001 allowed two articles to be posted on the site offering support to the then Taliban government in Afghanistan. The US accepted that the website was operated from the UK but claimed jurisdiction because one of the servers hosting the website was located in the US. He fought a public eight-year legal battle, from prison, to be tried in Britain but the British Crown Prosecution Service concluded that there was "insufficient evidence to prosecute" him.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohammed Atif Siddique</span>

Mohammed Atif Siddique is a Scottish prisoner who was found guilty, but later cleared on appeal, of one of his convictions "collecting terrorist-related information, setting up websites...and circulating inflammatory terrorist publications", resulting in a sentence of eight years' imprisonment. His defence has consistently been that he was a curious 20-year-old youth, still living with his parents, who was "looking for answers on the internet". One of his convictions was quashed on appeal on the 29th of January, 2010. He remains a convicted terrorist.

Samina Malik was the first person to be convicted under the UK's 2000 Terrorism Act. Malik, then a 23-year-old Heathrow Airport shop clerk from Southall, west London, was found guilty of "possessing a document or a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism", but was earlier acquitted on the more serious charge of "possessing an article for terrorist purposes". Her conviction was later overturned on appeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development</span> Defunct US Islamic charity

The Holy Land Foundation (HLF) was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, and run by Palestinian-Americans, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. The organization's mission was to "find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters."

Rangzieb Ahmed is a British citizen who was allegedly the highest ranking al-Qaeda operative in the United Kingdom (UK). Ahmed, who was a key link between British recruits and al-Qaeda leaders, was responsible for setting up a terrorist cell in Manchester and contacting one of the terrorists responsible for the failed London bombings of 21 July 2005.

The 2005 Sydney terrorism plot concerned a group of five men arrested in 2005 on charges of planning an act of terrorism targeting Sydney, Australia's most populous city and the capital of New South Wales. The group was found guilty on 16 October 2009 and were sentenced on 15 February 2010 for terms up to 28 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sami Al-Arian indictments and trial</span>

Sami Al-Arian indictments and trial began on February 20, 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Sami Al-Arian had been arrested as the alleged leader of the Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in the U.S., and Secretary of the PIJ's central worldwide governing group. It also charged three others living in the U.S., as well as four outside the U.S. These included Al-Arian's long-time top USF/WISE associate Ramadan Abdullah Shallah, who had been designated a Specially Designated Terrorist by the U.S. in 1995, and was accused of being Secretary General of the PIJ.

Sabri Benkahla is an American Muslim theologian and lecturer of Islamic Studies. He was convicted on February 5, 2007, of two counts before a grand jury. The first count was for obstruction of justice and the second for making a false statement to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This conviction qualified for sentencing enhancement pursuant to 3A1.4, Application Note 2. The sentence he received was 10 years.

<i>R v Gnango</i> British legal case

Regina v Armel Gnango[2011] UKSC 59 is the leading English criminal law case on the interaction of joint enterprise, transferred malice, and exemption from criminal liability where a party to what would normally be a crime is the victim of it. The Supreme Court held, restoring Gnango's conviction for the murder of Magda Pniewska, that he was guilty of murder notwithstanding the fact that he had not fired the shot which killed Pniewska during the shoot out which led to her death, and that the fatal shot had been fired by his opponent in an attempt to kill him. The judgment of the Supreme Court has been criticised over the alleged extent to which it was designed to mollify public opinion, and in the context of debates over the nature of the doctrine of joint enterprise.

<i>R v Coulson, Brooks and others</i>

R v Coulson, Brooks and others was a trial at the Old Bailey in London, England, arising from the News International phone hacking scandal.

Andrew George Lindsay Nicol is a retired judge of the High Court of England and Wales.

Aine Lesley Davis, also known as Jihadi Paul, is a British convert to Islam who was convicted in a Turkish court of being a member of a terrorist group while serving as a fighter for the ISIL.

References

  1. 1 2 Court of Appeal decision on trial secrecy
  2. ↑ "Secret trial plan for English court". BBC News. 4 June 2014.
  3. 1 2 Laville, Sandra (4 June 2014). "Major terrorism trial could be held in secret for first time in UK legal history". The Guardian.
  4. 1 2 "Fully secret terror trial blocked by Court of Appeal". BBC News. 12 June 2014.
  5. ↑ Nick Cohen, Secret justice will lead to paranoia – and it's not very British, The Observer , 14 June 2014
  6. ↑ "Key elements of secret terror trial can be heard in public, court rules". The Guardian. 12 June 2014.
  7. 1 2 3 Mason, Rowena (5 June 2014). "Secret trials: judges should be trusted to make right decisions, says Grayling". The Guardian.
  8. ↑ Bowcott, Owen (16 June 2014). "Secret trial of terror suspects delayed until October". The Guardian.
  9. ↑ "Pair appear in court on terror charges". BBC News. BBC. 21 October 2013. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  10. ↑ "Terror suspects in court after operation near Tower of London". Docklands and East London Advertiser. 21 October 2013. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  11. ↑ Peachey, Paul (4 June 2014). "Terror trial to be heard in secret in break with tradition". The Independent.
  12. ↑ guardian.com: "Secret trials: judges should be trusted to make right decisions, says Grayling" 5 Jun 2014
  13. ↑ Bowcott, Owen (12 June 2014). "Key elements of secret terror trial can be heard in public, court rules". theguardian.com . Retrieved 14 June 2014.
  14. ↑ O'Neill, Sean (6 June 2014). "Secret trial damage 'would be irreversible'". The Times. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  15. ↑ Whitehead, Tom (4 June 2014). "Secret terror trial is 'assault' on British justice". The Telegraph. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  16. ↑ telegraph.co.uk: "Secret trials: 'Democracies die behind closed doors'" 5 Jun 2014
  17. ↑ telegraph.co.uk: "The trial that has to be heard in secret – and don’t ask why" (McCartney) 5 Jun 2014
  18. ↑ Phillips, Melanie (9 June 2014). "Sometimes justice has to be done in secret". The Times . Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  19. ↑ telegraph.co.uk: "MP demands debate on secret terror trial", 12 Jun 2014
  20. 1 2 telegraph.co.uk: "Secret terror trial hears Tony Blair's property was a target" 14 Oct 2014
  21. ↑ telegraph.co.uk: "Secret trial: Erol Incedal claims he was plotting robbery not terror attack", 31 Oct 2014
  22. ↑ bbc.co.uk: "'Secret' terror trial jury discharged at Old Bailey", 11 Nov 2014
  23. ↑ telegraph.co.uk: "Erol Incedal secret terror trial: suspect convicted of possessing terrorist information", 17 Nov 2014
  24. ↑ Cobain, Ian (26 March 2015). "Student cleared of London terror charge after partially secret trial". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 March 2015.
  25. ↑ Press Association (13 December 2015). "Secret terror trial transcripts reveal accused's luxury lifestyle". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
  26. ↑ "Erol Incedal terror case gagging order upheld". BBC News. 9 February 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  27. ↑ telegraph.co.uk: "Lord Chief Justice: 'Terror accused should never be anonymous'", 12 Nov 2014
  28. ↑ Irving and Townend, Henry and Judith (10 February 2016). "Censorship and National Security: Information Control in the Second World War and Present Day". History and Policy. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.