Ravi Gomatam

Last updated

Ravi Gomatam
R Gomatam 2011.jpg
Ravi Gomatam, June, 2011
BornJanuary 1950
Alma mater Annamalai University
BITS Pilani
University of Mumbai
Scientific career
Fields Quantum physics

Ravi Veeraraghavan Gomatam (born in Chennai, India) is the director of Bhaktivedanta Institute (Berkeley and Mumbai) and the newly formed Institute of Semantic Information Sciences and Technology, Mumbai. He teaches graduate-level courses at these institutes. He was an adjunct professor at Birla Institute of Technology & Science (BITS), Pilani, Rajasthan, India (1993–2015).

Contents

He has been made a visiting professor for the year 2016–2017 at the Indian Council of Philosophical Research (ICPR), a Government of India body, under the Ministry of Human Resource Development.

In January 1990, he organized a conference titled First International Conference on the Study of Consciousness within Science in San Francisco. [1] Subsequently, in 1997 Gomatam conceived and launched the world's first[ citation needed ] M.S./Ph.D. programs in "consciousness studies", [2] in collaboration with the Birla Institute of Technology & Science (BITS), Pilani (one of India's foremost technological universities). "Consciousness Studies" is a developing, inter-disciplinary scientific field, which Gomatam has particularly re-conceived as a new way of studying matter. [3]

In 2015, the Institute of Semantic Information Sciences and Technology started offering M.A. (by research) and Ph.D. programs [4] in collaboration with the Mumbai University, India.

Gomatam’s own field of research is foundations of quantum mechanics, wherein he is introducing a few new ideas, including those of "Objective, Semantic Information" and a notion of "Relational Properties" that is different from that of Rovelli and others. His new ideas have received notice for their potential. [5] He has related research interests in semantic computation, systems sciences, artificial intelligence, philosophy of science and philosophy of language. [6]

Education

Early work in the industry

In the 1970s Gomatam worked with India’s international airline on their software development projects. He then moved to the USA and worked as a freelance consultant for a number of Fortune-500 companies including General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Burroughs and IBM in the areas of operating system design, data communications and very-large database design. [6]

Academic career

Starting from the early 1980s, Gomatam turned to fundamental scientific research, and started contributing to the development of the Bhaktivedanta Institute (B.I.) in Mumbai and Berkeley. Along the way, based on the work he was doing at B.I., he obtained his Ph.D. in the foundations of quantum mechanics. [6]

He has been a visiting scholar at University of Pretoria, South Africa and Loyola University, New Orleans, USA. [6]

Research

Gomatam’s primary area of research is in non-relativistic quantum mechanics (QM), which emerged in 1925 with Erwin Schrödinger's derivation of the "wave equation".

Gomatam is developing his own approach to macroscopic quantum mechanics (MQM, applying the wave equation to the macroscopic regime), which is distinct from the ideas of ‘macroscopic dissipative systems’ [7] and ‘macroscopic quantum coherence’, [8] developed in the early 80s by Anthony James Leggett. [9] In general, Leggett's attempt is to create an experimental situation using a SQUID, wherein a coherent superposition at the microscopic level can also be scaled up to the macroscopic level, because of involving a large number of microscopic objects (that is, electrons, of the order of 10^15 to 10^20) in coherent superposition. [8]

In contrast, Gomatam is attempting to develop MQM independent of the application of the Schrödinger equation to the micro regime, in such a manner that quantum superposition can be directly observed at the macroscopic level. This involves introducing a new notion of macroscopic objects as quantum kinds, instead of classical objects. [10] In this regard, he is also developing two further new ideas within physics: the ontology of "Objective, Semantic Information" (OSI) and corresponding "Relational Properties" (RPs).

As part of developing his version of MQM, Gomatam has related interests in exotic manifolds, semantic information processing, quantum computation, and philosophy of ordinary language. [6]

Selected papers

Activities and societies

Related Research Articles

The Copenhagen interpretation is a collection of views about the meaning of quantum mechanics, stemming from the work of Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and others. The term "Copenhagen interpretation" was apparently coined by Heisenberg during the 1950s to refer to ideas developed in the 1925–1927 period, glossing over his disagreements with Bohr. Consequently, there is no definitive historical statement of what the interpretation entails.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Many-worlds interpretation</span> Interpretation of quantum mechanics that denies the collapse of the wavefunction

The many-worlds interpretation (MWI) is a philosophical position about how the mathematics used in quantum mechanics relates to physical reality. It asserts that the universal wavefunction is objectively real, and that there is no wave function collapse. This implies that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in some "world" or universe. In contrast to some other interpretations, the evolution of reality as a whole in MWI is rigidly deterministic and local. Many-worlds is also called the relative state formulation or the Everett interpretation, after physicist Hugh Everett, who first proposed it in 1957. Bryce DeWitt popularized the formulation and named it many-worlds in the 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum mechanics</span> Description of physical properties at the atomic and subatomic scale

Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of nature at and below the scale of atoms. It is the foundation of all quantum physics, which includes quantum chemistry, quantum field theory, quantum technology, and quantum information science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Schrödinger's cat</span> Thought experiment in quantum mechanics

In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, of quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This thought experiment was devised by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935 in a discussion with Albert Einstein to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to explain how the mathematical theory of quantum mechanics might correspond to experienced reality. Although quantum mechanics has held up to rigorous and extremely precise tests in an extraordinarily broad range of experiments, there exist a number of contending schools of thought over their interpretation. These views on interpretation differ on such fundamental questions as whether quantum mechanics is deterministic or stochastic, local or non-local, which elements of quantum mechanics can be considered real, and what the nature of measurement is, among other matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wigner's friend</span> Thought experiment in theoretical quantum physics

Wigner's friend is a thought experiment in theoretical quantum physics, first published by the Hungarian-American physicist Eugene Wigner in 1961, and further developed by David Deutsch in 1985. The scenario involves an indirect observation of a quantum measurement: An observer observes another observer who performs a quantum measurement on a physical system. The two observers then formulate a statement about the physical system's state after the measurement according to the laws of quantum theory. In the Copenhagen interpretation, the resulting statements of the two observers contradict each other. This reflects a seeming incompatibility of two laws in the Copenhagen interpretation: the deterministic and continuous time evolution of the state of a closed system and the nondeterministic, discontinuous collapse of the state of a system upon measurement. Wigner's friend is therefore directly linked to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics with its famous Schrödinger's cat paradox.

In philosophy, philosophy of physics deals with conceptual and interpretational issues in modern physics, many of which overlap with research done by certain kinds of theoretical physicists. Philosophy of physics can be broadly divided into three areas:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panpsychism</span> View that mind is a fundamental feature of reality

In the philosophy of mind, panpsychism is the view that the mind or a mind-like aspect is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of reality. It is also described as a theory that "the mind is a fundamental feature of the world which exists throughout the universe". It is one of the oldest philosophical theories, and has been ascribed to philosophers including Thales, Plato, Spinoza, Leibniz, William James, Alfred North Whitehead, Bertrand Russell, and Galen Strawson. In the 19th century, panpsychism was the default philosophy of mind in Western thought, but it saw a decline in the mid-20th century with the rise of logical positivism. Recent interest in the hard problem of consciousness and developments in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and quantum physics have revived interest in panpsychism in the 21st century.

In quantum mechanics, the measurement problem is the problem of definite outcomes: quantum systems have superpositions but quantum measurements only give one definite result.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bohr–Einstein debates</span> Series of public disputes between physicists Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein

The Bohr–Einstein debates were a series of public disputes about quantum mechanics between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. Their debates are remembered because of their importance to the philosophy of science, insofar as the disagreements—and the outcome of Bohr's version of quantum mechanics becoming the prevalent view—form the root of the modern understanding of physics. Most of Bohr's version of the events held in the Solvay Conference in 1927 and other places was first written by Bohr decades later in an article titled, "Discussions with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics". Based on the article, the philosophical issue of the debate was whether Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which centered on his belief of complementarity, was valid in explaining nature. Despite their differences of opinion and the succeeding discoveries that helped solidify quantum mechanics, Bohr and Einstein maintained a mutual admiration that was to last the rest of their lives.

The ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics considers the quantum state description to apply only to an ensemble of similarly prepared systems, rather than supposing that it exhaustively represents an individual physical system.

The quantum mind or quantum consciousness is a group of hypotheses proposing that local physical laws and interactions from classical mechanics or connections between neurons alone cannot explain consciousness, positing instead that quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as entanglement and superposition that cause nonlocalized quantum effects, interacting in smaller features of the brain than cells, may play an important part in the brain's function and could explain critical aspects of consciousness. These scientific hypotheses are as yet unvalidated, and they can overlap with quantum mysticism. Empirical evidence is against the notion of quantum consciousness, experiments do not support hypotheses of quantum mind.

Objective-collapse theories, also known spontaneous collapse models or dynamical reduction models, are proposed solutions to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. As with other interpretations of quantum mechanics, they are possible explanations of why and how quantum measurements always give definite outcomes, not a superposition of them as predicted by the Schrödinger equation, and more generally how the classical world emerges from quantum theory. The fundamental idea is that the unitary evolution of the wave function describing the state of a quantum system is approximate. It works well for microscopic systems, but progressively loses its validity when the mass / complexity of the system increases.

Dipankar Home is an Indian theoretical physicist at Bose Institute, Kolkata. He works on the fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics, including quantum entanglement and Quantum communication. He is co-author with Partha Ghose of the popular book Riddles in your Teacup - Fun with Everyday Scientific Puzzles.

Some interpretations of quantum mechanics posit a central role for an observer of a quantum phenomenon. The quantum mechanical observer is tied to the issue of observer effect, where a measurement necessarily requires interacting with the physical object being measured, affecting its properties through the interaction. The term "observable" has gained a technical meaning, denoting a Hermitian operator that represents a measurement.

An index list of articles about the philosophy of science.

This is a glossary for the terminology applied in the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum metaphysics, collectively called quantum philosophy, a subfield of philosophy of physics.

The von Neumann–Wigner interpretation, also described as "consciousness causes collapse", is an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which consciousness is postulated to be necessary for the completion of the process of quantum measurement.

Jan Faye is a Danish philosopher of science and metaphysics. He is currently associate professor in philosophy at the University of Copenhagen. Faye has contributed to a number of areas in philosophy including explanation, interpretation, philosophy of the humanities and the natural sciences, evolutionary naturalism, philosophy of Niels Bohr, and topics concerning time, causation, and backward causation (Retrocausality).

Quantum social science is an emerging field of interdisciplinary research which draws parallels between quantum physics and the social sciences. Although there is no settled consensus on a single approach, a unifying theme is that, while the social sciences have long modelled themselves on mechanistic science, they can learn much from quantum ideas such as complementarity and entanglement. Some authors are motivated by quantum mind theories that the brain, and therefore human interactions, are literally based on quantum processes, while others are more interested in taking advantage of the quantum toolkit to simulate social behaviours which elude classical treatment. Quantum ideas have been particularly influential in psychology but are starting to affect other areas such as international relations and diplomacy in what one 2018 paper called a "quantum turn in the social sciences".

References

  1. "The First International Conference for the Study of Consciousness within Science". Bhaktivedanta Institute. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  2. "Graduate Studies". Bhaktivedanta Institute. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  3. Gomatam, Ravi (12 June 2010). "What is Consciousness Studies?". Bhaktivedanta Institute. Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  4. "Institute of Semantic Information Sciences and Technology". InSIST. Retrieved 24 December 2015.
  5. "Appreciations". Bhaktivedanta Institute. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "Resume". ravigomatam.com. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  7. Caldeira, A. O.; Anthony Leggett (1981). "Influence of Dissipation on Quantum Tunneling in Macroscopic Systems". Physical Review Letters. 46 (4): 211–214. Bibcode:1981PhRvL..46..211C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.211.
  8. 1 2 Leggett, Anthony; Anupam Garg (1985). "Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?". Physical Review Letters. 54 (9): 857–860. Bibcode:1985PhRvL..54..857L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.857. PMID   10031639. S2CID   7225825.
  9. Leggett, Anthony; Iguchi, E; Oohara, Y (2002). "Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects". Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 14 (15): R415–451. Bibcode:2002JPCM...14..415N. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/3/311.
  10. Gomatam, Ravi (17 September 2010). "Quantum Realism and Haecceity". In Partha Ghose (ed.). Materialism and Immaterialism in India and the West: Varying Vistas. New Delhi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  11. Gomatam, Ravi (2007). "Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation -- Are the two incompatible?". Philosophy of Science. 74 (5): 736–748. doi:10.1086/525618.
  12. "Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 24 July 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2015.
  13. Kutach, Douglas (2010). "Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Spring 2010". Assignment 2. Archived from the original on 7 February 2016. Retrieved 28 December 2015.
  14. Gomatam, Ravi (1999). "Quantum Theory and the Observation Problem". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 6 (11–12): 173–90. arXiv: 0708.1587 . Bibcode:2007arXiv0708.1587G.
  15. Turvey, Michael T. (2015). "Quantum-Like Issues at Nature's Ecological Scale (the Scale of Organisms and Their Environments)". Mind and Matter. 13 (1). Retrieved 27 December 2015.
  16. Prinz, Wolfgang; Beisert, Miriam; Herwig, Arvid (2013). Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press. p. 160. Retrieved 28 December 2015.
  17. Stuckey, W.M.; Silberstein, Michael (2000). "Uniform Spaces in the Pregeometric Modeling of Quantum Non-Separability". International Journal of Theoretical Physics. arXiv: gr-qc/0003104 . Bibcode:2000gr.qc.....3104S.
  18. Pardalos, Panos M.; Yatsekno, Vitaliy A. (2008). "Optimization And Control Of Quantum-Mechanical Processes". Optimization and Control of Bilinear Systems: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer Optimization and its Applications. Vol. 11. New York: Springer. p. 208. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73669-3. ISBN   978-0-387-73669-3. S2CID   124178302.
  19. Gomatam, Ravi (2011). "How Do Classical and Quantum Probabilities Differ?". In A. Khrennikov (ed.). Foundations of Probabilities and Physics - 6. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1424. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings. pp. 105–110. doi:10.1063/1.3688958. S2CID   46401433.
  20. Gomatam, Ravi (2010). "Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics and System of Systems Design Approach". Indo-US Workshop on Systems Engineering. India.
  21. Gomatam, Ravi (2009). "Quantum Theory, the Chinese Room Argument and the Symbol Grounding Problem". In P. Bruza; et al. (eds.). Quantum Interaction-2009, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5494. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 174–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00834-4_15. ISBN   978-3-642-00833-7.
  22. Gomatam, Ravi (2010). "Quantum Realism and Haecceity". In Partha Ghose (ed.). Levels of Reality: Part 5: Materialism and Immaterialism in India and the West: Varying Vistas, HSPCIC. Vol. 12. New Delhi, India: CSC, Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
  23. Gomatam, Ravi (2010). "Popper's Propensity Interpretation and Heisenberg's Potentia Interpretation — A comparative assessment". In Pradip K. Sengupta (ed.). History Of Science And Philosophy Of Science: A Historical Perspective of The Evolution of Ideas In Science. Vol. 13. New Delhi, India: CSC, Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
  24. Gomatam, Ravi (2005). "Do Hodgson's Propositions Uniquely Characterize Free Will?". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 12 (1): 32–40.
  25. Gomatam, Ravi (2004). "Physics and Common Sense: Relearning the Connections in the Light of Quantum Theory". In Chattopadhyaya, D.P.; Sen Gupta, A.K. (eds.). Philosophical Consciousness and Scientific Knowledge: Conceptual Linkages and Civilizational Background, HSPCIC. New Delhi: CSC, Indian Council of Philosophical Research. arXiv: 0708.1536 .