Raymond Jackson | |
---|---|
Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia | |
Assumed office November 23, 2021 | |
Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia | |
In office November 22,1993 –November 23,2021 | |
Appointed by | Bill Clinton |
Preceded by | Richard Leroy Williams |
Succeeded by | Jamar K. Walker |
Personal details | |
Born | Raymond Alvin Jackson August 3,1949 Sussex,Virginia,U.S. |
Spouse | Gwendolyn Jackson |
Children | Candace |
Education | Norfolk State University (BA) University of Virginia (JD) |
Raymond Alvin Jackson (born August 3,1949) [1] is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Born in Sussex,Virginia,Jackson received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Norfolk State University in 1970 and a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1973. He was in the United States Army,JAG Corps,from 1973 to 1977,attaining the rank of captain. He thereafter remained in the United States Army Reserve,achieving the rank of colonel. He was an Assistant United States Attorney of the Eastern District of Virginia from 1977 to 1993,and was an adjunct lecturer at the College of William and Mary,Marshall-Wythe School of Law,from 1981 to 1991 and in 1993.
On September 24,1993,Jackson was nominated by President Bill Clinton to a seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia vacated by Richard Leroy Williams. Jackson was confirmed by the United States Senate on November 20,1993,and received his commission on November 22,1993. He assumed senior status on November 23,2021.
This section of a biography of a living person does not include any references or sources .(June 2021) |
Jackson was the district court judge in the critical Supreme Court decision in Kimbrough v. United States (2007). Derrick Kimbrough was indicted in September 2004 on four drug-related counts:conspiracy to distribute both crack and powder cocaine;possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of crack cocaine;possession with intent to distribute powder cocaine;and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. Kimbrough pleaded guilty to all four counts. Under the statutes that define these respective crimes,Kimbrough faced a sentence of between 15 years and life in prison. Based on the facts,Kimbrough admitted at his change-of-plea hearing,as well as the fact that Kimbrough had testified falsely at a codefendant's trial,Jackson computed the applicable range under the federal sentencing guidelines at 228 to 270 months in prison.
Kimbrough's Guidelines range was so high because his offense involved both crack and powder cocaine. Jackson observed that if Kimbrough's crime had involved powder cocaine only,his sentencing range would have been 97 to 106 months. The mandatory minimum sentence,in turn,was 180 months in prison,and Jackson imposed that sentence.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the sentence and remanded for further proceedings. Relying on a prior opinion,the appellate court stated that any sentence that fell outside the Guidelines range was per se unreasonable if that sentence was based on a policy disagreement with the fact that crack cocaine offenses are punished more harshly than powder cocaine offenses. The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the Fourth Circuit's reasoning in this case and reversed the Fourth Circuit's opinion,holding that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for cocaine are advisory only,and a judge may consider the disparity between the Guidelines' treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses when imposing a sentence sufficient,but not greater than necessary.
Jackson is married to retired judge Gwendolyn Jackson from the 4th Judicial District of Virginia. Their daughter Candace Jackson-Akiwumi is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
United States v. Booker,543 U.S. 220 (2005),is a United States Supreme Court decision on criminal sentencing. The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial requires that other than a prior conviction,only facts admitted by a defendant or proved beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury may be used to calculate a sentence exceeding the prescribed statutory maximum sentence,whether the defendant has pleaded guilty or been convicted at trial. The maximum sentence that a judge may impose is based upon the facts admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
The crack epidemic was a surge of crack cocaine use in major cities across the United States throughout the entirety of the 1980s and the early 1990s. This resulted in a number of social consequences,such as increasing crime and violence in American inner city neighborhoods,a resulting backlash in the form of tough on crime policies,a massive spike in incarceration rates,and a sharp escalation of the war on drugs.
Kimbrough v. United States,552 U.S. 85 (2007),was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court confirmed that federal district judges utilize,in an advisory fashion,Federal Sentencing Guidelines,in cases involving conduct related to possession,distribution,and manufacture of crack cocaine.
Frederic Block is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Gall v. United States,552 U.S. 38 (2007),was a decision by the United States Supreme Court,which held that the federal appeals courts may not presume that a sentence falling outside the range recommended by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines is unreasonable. Applying this rule to the case at hand,it upheld a sentence of 36 months' probation imposed on a man who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute ecstasy in the face of a recommended sentence of 30 to 37 months in prison.
Mark Warren Bennett is a former United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa and a professor at Drake University Law School.
Jack Tarpley Camp Jr. is a former United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. A Republican,he was nominated by Ronald Reagan,and retired from the bench in November 2010 after pleading guilty to drug related charges,including a felony count for giving a stripper cocaine even though he knew she was a convicted felon.
Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson is an American lawyer and jurist who is an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Jackson was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Joe Biden on February 25,2022,and confirmed by the U.S. Senate and sworn into office that same year. She is the first black woman and the first former federal public defender to serve on the Supreme Court. From 2021 to 2022,Jackson was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 was an Act of Congress that was signed into federal law by United States President Barack Obama on August 3,2010,that reduces the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio and eliminated the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine,among other provisions. Similar bills were introduced in several U.S. Congresses before its passage in 2010,and courts had also acted to reduce the sentencing disparity prior to the bill's passage.
The Drug Trafficking Safe Harbor Elimination Act was a bill proposed to the 112th United States Congress in 2011. It was introduced to amend Section 846 of the Controlled Substances Act to close a loophole that has allowed many drug trafficking conspirators to avoid federal prosecution. The Drug Trafficking Safe Harbor Elimination Act would have made it a federal crime for persons who conspire on United States soil to traffic or aid and abet drug trafficking inside or even outside the borders of the United States. This Act was created to provide clarity to current laws within the United States and provide criminal prosecution of those who are involved in drug trafficking within the United States or outside its borders. This Act would have provided a borderless application to United States Law and extends possible criminal charges to all individuals involved in the drug transport. The bill passed the House but was not acted upon by the Senate and thus died.
The Federal Correctional Complex,Petersburg is a United States federal prison complex for male inmates in Petersburg,Virginia. It is operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons,a division of the United States Department of Justice.
Luis Felipe Restrepo,known commonly as L. Felipe Restrepo,is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and former United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. He is a member of the United States Sentencing Commission.
Dorsey v. United States,567 U.S. 260 (2012),is a Supreme Court of the United States decision in which the Court held that reduced mandatory minimum sentences for "crack cocaine" under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 does apply to defendants who committed a crime before the Act went into effect but who were sentenced after that date. The Act's silence on how to apply its new rules,before the effective date or not,caused a split among the Justices on how to interpret its new lenient provisions. Specifically,the case centered on Edward Dorsey,a prior offender who had been convicted of possession before the new rules came into effect but was sentenced after the effective date.
The Smarter Sentencing Act is a bill in the United States Senate that would reduce mandatory minimum sentences for some federal drug offenses. In some cases,the new minimums would apply retroactively,giving some people currently in prison on drug offenses a new sentence.
Shular v. United States,589 U.S. ___ (2020),is an opinion of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that,under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984,the definition of “serious drug offense”only requires that the state offense involve the conduct specified in the statute. Unlike other provisions of the ACCA,it does not require that state courts develop “generic”version of a crime,which describe the elements of the offense as they are commonly understood,and then compare the crime being charged to that generic version to determine whether the crime qualifies under the ACCA for purposes of penalty enhancement. The decision states that offenses defined under the ACCA are "unlikely names for generic offenses," and are therefore unambiguous. This renders the rule of lenity inapplicable.
United States v. Cotton,535 U.S. 625 (2002),is a United States Supreme Court case that held the omission of a fact in a federal indictment that would enhance the maximum sentence is not a jurisdictional error and thus is not justification for a vacation of the sentence.
Terry v. United States,593 U.S. ___ (2021),was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with retroactive changes to prison sentences for drug-possession crimes related to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010,its retroactive nature established by the First Step Act of 2018. In a unanimous judgement,the Court ruled that while the First Step Act does allow for retroactive considerations of sentence reductions for drug-possession crimes prior to 2010,this only covers those that were sentenced under minimum sentencing requirements.
Michael Stefan Nachmanoff is an American lawyer who serves as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He served as a magistrate judge of the same court from 2015 to 2021.
Concepcion v. United States,597 U.S. ___ (2022),is a United States Supreme Court decision that concerns district courts' ability to consider changes of law or fact in exercising their discretion to reduce a sentence.
Brown v. United States,,is a pending United States Supreme Court case.