Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877

Last updated
Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877
Author Eric Foner (b. 1943)
Cover artist A.R. Waud.
Country United States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectThe Reconstruction Era
GenreNon-Fiction
Published1st Edition: March 8, 1988 (Harper Perennial Modern Classics) (English)

Updated Edition: December 2, 2014 (Harper Perennial Modern Classics) (English)

Audiobook: 1990, (

Contents

Blackstone Audio) (English)
Media typehardcover, paperback, e-book, audiobook
Pages690
ISBN 006091453X

Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877 is a historical non-fiction monograph written by American historian Eric Foner. Its broad focus is the Reconstruction Era in the aftermath of the American Civil War, which consists of the social, political, economic, and cultural changes brought about as consequences of the war's outcome. The author addresses, criticizes, and integrates several historical perspectives of the Civil War that first appeared during Reconstruction, such as the reconciliationist, white supremacist, and abolitionist perspectives, into a single cohesive academic narrative based on primary sources, such as newspaper quotations and interviews with Americans who lived through the era, as well as secondary sources, such as other texts written on the subject.

The author divides the primary topic of the Reconstruction Era into several subcategories, addressing them individually throughout the text while also integrating them into a larger context. Such subtopics addressed by the book include the gradual abolition of race-based chattel slavery, the gradual emancipation of the previously enslaved, the Reconstruction Amendments, the integration of the previously enslaved into the post-war society, the continuation of Manifest Destiny, the development of new White Supremacist ideologies and groups in both the North and the South, racist pogroms and massacres carried out against the freedmen by former confederates, police, state officials, and vigilantes, the relationship of the newly freedmen to the previously free men, the relationship of freedmen to their former masters, the ascendancy of America's industrial bourgeoisie after emancipation, the dissolution of the wealth and power of the semi-feudal Southern slave aristocracy, the re-integration of Confederate states into the Union, the erection of legal frameworks to elaborate upon and reinforce emancipation, such as the Freedmen's Bureau, the development of systems of education for freed slaves, black male suffrage, the reuniting of African American families separated by slavery, the relationship of newly freed African Americans to the political economy, the appearance of state-sanctioned segregation, regional differences in how Reconstruction was handled, and attempts by freedmen to achieve subsistence and political independence outside the dual frameworks of Northern paternalism and Southern attempts to restore the old order.

Research and composition

Eric Foner stated, in a telephone interview in 1988, that was quoted in William S. McFeely's New York Times review of the book, that he had unearthed previously unused primary sources for the book from state governors' papers. He said "I found letters from ordinary people received by governors in a half-dozen Southern states [...] Ten years ago, when I began, I was a visiting professor at the University of South Carolina. The governors' papers there alone consisted of 121 boxes. The letters told me what was going on in people's minds because they came from all classes – former slaves, members of the Ku Klux Klan, white farmers, black leaders. They went to the grass roots of life." Foner stated that he did not apply much statistical analysis when researching the book, noting "Mine isn't statistical but analytical history. I didn't use computers because great issues are not susceptible to analysis by the numbers." [1] The book's extensive bibliography is broken down by chapter.

Synopsis and themes

The book is divided into a preface, twelve main chapters, and an epilogue. The book begins by addressing the last two years of the Civil War, and how it laid the groundwork for Reconstruction. The Emancipation Proclamation, its consequences, how it was enforced during the war, the New York Draft Riots, Lincoln's Assassination, the integration of former slaves into the Union Army, General Sherman's unfulfilled promises to the liberated slaves of Savannah, and the surrender of the South are all addressed during this early part of the book. Once the framework is established, the author moves on to the ambiguities of free labor, wage labor, and slave labor, the migration of working-class populations of all races, the failures of Presidential Reconstruction under Lincoln's successor Andrew Johnson, the making of Radical Reconstruction, and early Republican attempts to win votes from the South, after the war. In the final chapters of the book, Foner addresses the political and economic dimensions of Reconstruction, the challenge of the enforcement of new laws, the legal ambiguities of the post-war South and the American frontier, the reconstruction of the North, the politics of economic downturns throughout reconstruction, and the unfinished ideological projects of reconstruction. The author concludes that the laws, amendments and changing social attitudes of the Reconstruction Era constituted an incomplete social revolution in the United States, and that this unfinished revolution both created the necessity for future political movements and laid the groundwork for the Civil Rights Era nearly a century later, and that the institutions created or consolidated after the Civil War, such as the African American family, school, and church, provided a legal and cultural basis from which the modern civil rights movement would later be able to spring, as well as various economic populist movements, such trade unions, activist coalitions, political action committees, and political parties. Foner also concludes that the failure to redistribute the lands of the former plantation owners to the slaves constituted not only a moral failure to provide the former slaves the means of agricultural subsistence, but that it also constituted a deliberate attempt to force a Northern conception of industrial capitalism and free labor onto the South.

Reception and academic significance

Reviewing for The New York Times in 1988, William S. McFeely said of the book that "[Foner's] synthesis is the product not only of a dauntingly thorough reading of this large body of literature, but also of his own extensive research. The result is a compelling narrative that begins during the Civil War as slaves sought freedom by escaping from their pursuing masters and coming into Union Army camps." [2]

Reviewing for the Los Angeles Times in 1989, Gary Nash said of the book: "Eric Foner’s long, brilliant and stylish book [...] is of signal importance, not only to understanding one of the most controversial periods in American history but to comprehending the course of race relations in this country during the last century." [3]

Writing for the London Review of Books in 1990, J. R. Pole said of the book: "Earlier interpretations of the history of Reconstruction by [Kenneth Milton] Stampp and [John Hope] Franklin did much to lay down guidelines for the ‘Second Reconstruction’ school, whose approach reflected the mood of the modern civil rights movement: but Foner has brought under control an enormously greater mass of information." [4]

Awards and nominations

The book won the 1988 Los Angeles Times Book Prize in the category of History. [5]

Adaptations

In 1990, Eric Foner abridged the work from 690 pages to 320 pages in A Short History of Reconstruction. [6] In the same year, Blackstone Audio released an audiobook of the work narrated by Norman Dietz. In 2014, Harper Perennial Modern Classics released an updated edition.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reconstruction era</span> Military occupation of southern US states from 1865 to 1877

The Reconstruction era was a period in United States history following the American Civil War, dominated by the legal, social, and political challenges of abolishing slavery and reintegrating the former Confederate States of America into the United States. During this period, three amendments were added to the United States Constitution to grant equal civil rights to the newly freed slaves.

The Radical Republicans were a faction within the Republican Party originating from the party's founding in 1854—some six years before the Civil War—until the Compromise of 1877, which effectively ended Reconstruction. They called themselves "Radicals" because of their goal of immediate, complete, and permanent eradication of slavery in the United States. They were opposed during the war by the Moderate Republicans, and by the Democratic Party. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After unsuccessful measures in 1866 resulted in violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the Fourteenth Amendment for statutory protections through Congress. They opposed allowing ex-Confederate officers to retake political power in the Southern U.S., and emphasized equality, civil rights and voting rights for the "freedmen", i.e., former slaves who had been freed during or after the Civil War by the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedmen's Bureau</span> US agency assisting freedmen in the South

The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, usually referred to as simply the Freedmen's Bureau, was a U.S. government agency of early post American Civil War Reconstruction, assisting freedmen in the South. It was established on March 3, 1865, and operated briefly as a federal agency after the War, from 1865 to 1872, to direct "provisions, clothing, and fuel...for the immediate and temporary shelter and supply of destitute and suffering refugees and freedmen and their wives and children".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carpetbagger</span> Pejorative term for opportunistic Northerner

In the history of the United States, carpetbagger is a largely historical pejorative used by Southerners to describe allegedly opportunistic or disruptive Northerners who came to the Southern states after the American Civil War, who were perceived to be exploiting the local populace for their own financial, political, and/or social gain. The term broadly included both individuals who sought to promote Republican politics and individuals who saw business and political opportunities because of the chaotic state of the local economies following the war. In practice, the term carpetbagger was often applied to any Northerners who were present in the South during the Reconstruction Era (1865–1877). The term is closely associated with "scalawag", a similarly pejorative word used to describe native white Southerners who supported the Republican Party-led Reconstruction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eric Foner</span> American historian (born 1943)

Eric Foner is an American historian. He writes extensively on American political history, the history of freedom, the early history of the Republican Party, African American biography, the American Civil War, Reconstruction, and historiography, and has been a member of the faculty at the Columbia University Department of History since 1982. He is the author of several popular textbooks. According to the Open Syllabus Project, Foner is the most frequently cited author on college syllabi for history courses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Congressional Joint Committee on Reconstruction</span>

The Joint Committee on Reconstruction, also known as the Joint Committee of Fifteen, was a joint committee of the 39th United States Congress that played a major role in Reconstruction in the wake of the American Civil War. It was created to "inquire into the condition of the States which formed the so-called Confederate States of America, and report whether they, or any of them, are entitled to be represented in either house of Congress.”‪

The Redeemers were a political coalition in the Southern United States during the Reconstruction Era that followed the American Civil War. Redeemers were the Southern wing of the Democratic Party. They sought to regain their political power and enforce White supremacy. Their policy of Redemption was intended to oust the Radical Republicans, a coalition of freedmen, "carpetbaggers", and "scalawags". They were typically led by White yeomen and dominated Southern politics in most areas from the 1870s to 1910.

The Mississippi Plan of 1874 was developed by white Southern Democrats as part of the white insurgency during the Reconstruction Era in the Southern United States. It was devised by the Democratic Party in that state to overthrow the Republican Party in Mississippi by means of organized threats of violence and suppression or purchase of the black vote. Democrats wanted to regain political control of the legislature and governor's office. Their success in doing so led to similar plans being adopted by white Democrats in South Carolina and other majority-black states.

The Coushatta massacre (1874) was an attack by members of the White League, a white supremacist paramilitary organization composed of white Southern Democrats, on Republican officeholders and freedmen in Coushatta, the parish seat of Red River Parish, Louisiana. They assassinated six white Republicans and five to 20 freedmen who were witnesses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Union League</span> Pro-Union club during the American Civil War

The Union Leagues were quasi-secretive men's clubs established separately, starting in 1862, and continuing throughout the Civil War (1861–1865). The oldest Union League of America council member, an organization originally called "The League of Union Men", was formed in June 1862 in Pekin, Illinois. Four months later, on November 22, 1862, the Union League of Philadelphia, the first of the elite eastern Leagues and the second oldest ULA council member, was established.

<i>Black Reconstruction in America</i> Book by William Edward Burghardt Du Bois

Black Reconstruction in America: An Essay Toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860–1880 is a history of the Reconstruction era by W. E. B. Du Bois, first published in 1935. The book challenged the standard academic view of Reconstruction at the time, the Dunning School, which contended that the period was a failure and downplayed the contributions of African Americans. Du Bois instead emphasized the agency of Black people and freed slaves during the Civil War and Reconstruction and framed the period as one that held promise for a worker-ruled democracy to replace a slavery-based plantation economy.

Neoabolitionist is a term used in historiography to characterize historians of race relations motivated by the spirit of racial equality typified by the abolitionists who fought to abolish slavery in the mid-19th century. They write especially about African-American history, slavery in the United States, the American Civil War and the Reconstruction Era.

The Dunning School was a historiographical school of thought regarding the Reconstruction period of American history (1865–1877), supporting conservative elements against the Radical Republicans who introduced civil rights in the South. It was named for Columbia University professor William Archibald Dunning, who taught many of its followers.

William Archibald Dunning was an American historian and political scientist at Columbia University noted for his work on the Reconstruction era of the United States. He founded the informal Dunning School of interpreting the Reconstruction era through his own writings and the Ph.D. dissertations of his numerous students. Dunning has been criticized for advocating white supremacist interpretations, his "blatant use of the discipline of history for reactionary ends" and for offering "scholarly legitimacy to the disenfranchisement of southern blacks and to the Jim Crow system."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James M. Hinds</span> American politician (1833–1868)

James M. Hinds was the first U.S. Congressman assassinated in office. He served as member of the United States House of Representatives for Arkansas from June 24, 1868 until his assassination by the Ku Klux Klan. Hinds, who was white, was an advocate of civil rights for black former slaves during the Reconstruction era following the American Civil War.

In the United States, a freedmen's town was an African American municipality or community built by freedmen, formerly enslaved people who were emancipated during and after the American Civil War. These towns emerged in a number of states, most notably Texas. They are also known as freedom colonies, from the title of a book by Sitton and Conrad.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bibliography of the Reconstruction era</span> Eras main scholarly literature (1863–1877)

This is a selected bibliography of the main scholarly books and articles of Reconstruction, the period after the American Civil War, 1863–1877.

Historiography examines how the past has been viewed or interpreted. Historiographic issues about the American Civil War include the name of the war, the origins or causes of the war, and President Abraham Lincoln's views and goals regarding slavery.

The civil rights movement (1865-1896) aimed to eliminate racial discrimination against African Americans, improve their educational and employment opportunities, and establish their electoral power, just after the abolition of slavery in the United States. The period from 1865 to 1895 saw a tremendous change in the fortunes of the black community following the elimination of slavery in the South.

<i>The Fiery Trial</i> 2010 book by Eric Foner

The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery is a historical non-fiction book written by American historian Eric Foner. Published in 2010 by W. W. Norton & Company, the book serves as a biographical portrait of United States President Abraham Lincoln, discussing the evolution of his stance on slavery in the United States over the course of his life. The Fiery Trial, which derives its title from Lincoln's Annual Message to Congress of December 1, 1862, was the 22nd book written by Foner, the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. It was praised by critics and won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for History, the Bancroft Prize, and the Lincoln Prize.

References

  1. ↑ McFeely, William S. (1988-05-22). "A Moment of Terrifying Promise". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2021-03-17. Retrieved 2021-03-17. I found letters from ordinary people received by governors in a half-dozen Southern states [...] Ten years ago, when I began, I was a visiting professor at the University of South Carolina. The governors' papers there alone consisted of 121 boxes. The letters told me what was going on in people's minds because they came from all classes - former slaves, members of the Ku Klux Klan, white farmers, black leaders. They went to the grass roots of life."..."Mine isn't statistical but analytical history. I didn't use computers because great issues are not susceptible to analysis by the numbers.
  2. ↑ McFeely, William S. (1988-05-22). "A Moment of Terrifying Promise". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2021-03-17. Retrieved 2021-03-26. [Foner's] synthesis is the product not only of a dauntingly thorough reading of this large body of literature, but also of his own extensive research. The result is a compelling narrative that begins during the Civil War as slaves sought freedom by escaping from their pursuing masters and coming into Union Army camps.
  3. ↑ Nash, Gary (1988-10-16). "1988 Book Prize Winner: History: The Killing of 'Birth of a Nation.'". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on 2021-03-26. Retrieved 2021-03-26. Eric Foner's long, brilliant and stylish book [...] is of signal importance, not only to understanding one of the most controversial periods in American history but to comprehending the course of race relations in this country during the last century.
  4. ↑ Pole, J. R. (1990-01-11). "During the war and after the war". London Review of Books. 12 (1). Archived from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-10-24. Earlier interpretations of the history of Reconstruction by Stampp and Franklin did much to lay down guidelines for the 'Second Reconstruction' school, whose approach reflected the mood of the modern civil rights movement: but Foner has brought under control an enormously greater mass of information.
  5. ↑ "Book Prizes – Los Angeles Times Festival of Books» 1988 Los Angeles Times Book Prize Winners". Los Angeles Times . 2014-01-04. Archived from the original on 2014-01-04. Retrieved 2014-01-04. History Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877 by Eric Foner (Harper & Row)
  6. ↑ Foner, Eric (1990-01-01). A Short History of Reconstruction, 1863-1877. Harper & Row. ISBN   9780060964313 – via archive.org.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.