Red dress effect

Last updated
Red dress effect Red-dress1.jpg
Red dress effect

The red dress effect, which can be broadened to the general red-attraction effect, the red-romance effect, or the romantic red effect, is a phenomenon [ clarification needed ] in which the color red increases physical attraction, sexual desire, and romantic sentiments in comparison to other colors.

Contents

It has been asserted that this effect acts subconsciously because participants rarely report that they used color in their attractiveness judgments. [1] However, only one study has tested whether conscious awareness matters, with its findings casting doubt on this earlier speculation. [2] [ clarification needed ] In past decades, increased interest in color psychology has prompted multiple studies to investigate the red-attraction effect and the extent of this association. The scientific literature on the red-attraction effect is mixed, with sound evidence that both support and oppose the validity of the connection.

Hypothesis

Red face uakari monkey. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (9518378800).jpg
Red face uakari monkey.

Evolution

A plant's entomophilous flowers make a display when fertile to attract pollinating insects, bats, birds or other animals. In the wild, when many species of non-human primate females become fertile, their estrogen level rises, which causes their blood vessels to open up, leading to redness on the skin, especially near the face, [3] chest and genitalia. [4] [5] The color display on some female primates is called sexual swelling. This increase in redness has been shown to attract male counterparts, expressed by their increased activity in sex, self-stimulation, and attention towards the females. Reddening of the skin is also associated with sexual attraction in humans. When people experience romantic affection or sexual attraction towards another, blushing of the neck, face, and chest are common. [6] Red skin can also indicate peak fertile stages of the menstrual cycle, as estrogen levels increase in relation to progesterone levels and increase blood flow. [6] Therefore, there are reasons to believe in the existence of evolutionary instincts that associate red with fertility, assuming the animal in question can perceive colour with its eyes.

Near hairless red face Macaque. Wildlife primate monkey-of-japan macaca-fuscata closeup 31-05-2010.jpg
Near hairless red face Macaque.
Colorful display on male baboons "Mandrill" Mandrill at Singapore Zoo.jpg
Colorful display on male baboons "Mandrill"

Social conditioning

The connection between the color red and sexual attraction may be a result of social conditioning. In ancient mythology [6] and folklore, [7] red is associated with fertility. Similarly, red was used as a symbol of fertility in the rituals of ancient civilizations. [6] Women are thought to have worn the equivalent of a red lipstick as early as 10,000 B.C. [8] As such, the link between sexual receptiveness and red may be a result of social conditioning; however, this social conditioning may have originated for biological and evolutionary reasons, and is simply an extension of our primal instincts.

Evidence for and against the red-attraction effect

A large portion of the research into the red-attraction effect focuses on the impact on the visual presentation of the color red paired with the presentation of a person to whom participants indicate their attraction. In a study by Pazda [9] it was shown that females wearing red are rated more attractive by males. They explained this by referring to the biological aspect that sexually receptive women are more attractive because of them having a higher probability for engaging in sexual activity, as well as a higher probability for the males to successfully reproduce. Elliot and Nesta from the University of Rochester found that men reported more romantic feelings towards women when the women were wearing red or presented on a red background. [10]

The same effect seems to work for females rating males. In a disputed [11] study by Elliot, [12] [13] it was shown that males wearing red are rated more attractive by females. In another experiment of Elliot's study, [12] women rated men as more attractive and reported being more sexually attracted to them when their photos were presented against a red background than when their photos were presented on a gray background. In an attempt to quell doubts about this study overall, [11] other researchers have attempted to replicate this specific experiment. Overall, the multiple replication studies countered the conclusions of the original study, showing that changing the color of the background had no significant effect on the perceived attraction [14] [15]

A large replication study by Peperkoorn et al. found no evidence for the red dress effect. [16] Indeed, another large experiment found no evidence that red color cues are systematically associated with attractiveness ratings, casting doubt on the underlying mechanisms typically used to explain the red-attraction effect. [17]

A study out of South Korea also supported the red-attraction link, as male participants rated a female model as more attractive when wearing a red shirt when compared to gray or blue shirts. [18]

Some studies evaluated the red-romance link without investigating the role of red clothing. One study refuted the red-attraction link, showing that participants categorized red as being more related to anger-related words than to romance-related words, and that the romance-related words were categorized more with the color pink. [19] Another study examined the effect of the word "red" when verbally spoken, and found that when men were described as wearing red shirts they were rated as more attractive when compared to men described as wearing gray shirts, and when compared to men wearing green shirts. [20] Therefore, this study also supported the red-attraction effect.

One study specifically evaluated the use of red clothing as a signal of sexual attraction, and found that women chose to wear a red shirt rather than a green shirt more often when they were told that they would be conversing with an attractive man than when they were told they were meeting with an unattractive man. [21]

Research conducted in Germany [22] seems to extend the red-attraction effect to self-attraction. Participants wore either a red or blue shirt, and were then directed to rate their own attractiveness. Both males and females that wore red shirts rated themselves as more attractive, even when accounting for factors that typically influence self-attraction like BMI or mood. [22] Red may be influential by increasing one's own perceived attractiveness, which in turn boosts self-confidence, and increased confidence is generally associated with higher levels of attraction from others. [23]

Possible explanations

There seem to be multiple factors that influence the strength or presence of the red-attraction effect, which may account for the unclear evidence about the effect overall.

One possible explanation, that the red-attraction effect is ingrained and independent from societal influence, is supported by a study conducted in isolated rural communities of Burkina Faso. [24] When males were asked to indicate the attraction of women photographed against red and blue backgrounds, those in the red condition rated the women as more attractive. [24] Therefore, this study supports the universality of the red-attraction effect. However, they did not report a stronger sexual desire towards the women, which led to the conclusion that the red-attraction effect may be constrained by culturally appropriate expressions of attraction. [24] This may explain why some studies have not supported the red-attraction effect.

Another study [25] examined the role of sexual dimorphism as a possible moderator. Sexual dimorphism, morphological differences between the sexes of a species, are the differences between masculine and feminine facial features in this context. The study, conducted in China, found that the red-attraction effect only held true when males were rating faces with highly feminine cues. [25] Feminine cues were determined by averaging several female faces together, and averaging several male faces together and isolating the differences. When males rated faces with more masculinity cues, the color red seemed to have no impact on perceived attraction. [25] Sexual dimorphism could be a possible explanation for variying results in studies of the red-attraction effect.

However, there may also be reason to conclude that the red-romance effect could be due to the awareness of the proposed connection between the color red and the object or person that is being rated. One study concludes that the typical red-attraction link only occurs when an explicit pairing of the color red and the target occurs, rather than an implicit or unconscious cue. [26] As such, high awareness of the color-target pair is a necessary constraint of the red-attraction effect. [26]

The red-attraction effect is strongly limited by a baseline or prior level of attraction. The red-attraction effect only held true when males rated females that they initially rated as attractive. [27] In females rated as unattractive, the presentation of the color red did not increase perceived attraction. [27]

There may also be a differing red-attraction effect based on the relationship status of the observer. Married women viewed men as less attractive when their pictures were presented on a red background, and were more likely to recall words related to commitment than when observing men on a white background. [28] Therefore, the relationship may be limited by the observer's level of emotional commitment, in which the color red may serve as a deterrent rather than an attractant.

Conclusion

Further research on the red-attraction effect could improve on the methods used to evaluate this effect, as the quality of the current studies on the red-attraction effect is not favorable. [29] The majority of existing research fails to consider color production and color presentation, [29] and future research could also take into account sample size and the complexity of color psychology. Additionally, the conclusions for male participants are clearer than those for female participants. [29] Studies of higher quality could yield a clearer conclusion about the true effect, if any, of red on attraction.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jealousy</span> Emotion

Jealousy generally refers to the thoughts or feelings of insecurity, fear, and concern over a relative lack of possessions or safety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual attraction</span> Attraction on the basis of sexual desire

Sexual attraction is attraction on the basis of sexual desire or the quality of arousing such interest. Sexual attractiveness or sex appeal is an individual's ability to attract other people sexually, and is a factor in sexual selection or mate choice. The attraction can be to the physical or other qualities or traits of a person, or to such qualities in the context where they appear. The attraction may be to a person's aesthetics, movements, voice, or smell, among other things. The attraction may be enhanced by a person's adornments, clothing, perfume or hair style. It can be influenced by individual genetic, psychological, or cultural factors, or to other, more amorphous qualities. Sexual attraction is also a response to another person that depends on a combination of the person possessing the traits and on the criteria of the person who is attracted.

Sociosexuality, sometimes called sociosexual orientation, is the individual difference in the willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship. Individuals who are more restricted sociosexually are less willing to engage in casual sex; they prefer greater love, commitment and emotional closeness before having sex with romantic partners. Individuals who are more unrestricted sociosexually are more willing to have casual sex and are more comfortable engaging in sex without love, commitment or closeness.

The halo effect is the proclivity for positive impressions of a person, company, country, brand, or product in one area to positively influence one's opinion or feelings. Halo effect is "the name given to the phenomenon whereby evaluators tend to be influenced by their previous judgments of performance or personality." The halo effect is a cognitive bias which can prevent someone from forming an image of a person, a product or a brand based on the sum of all objective circumstances at hand.

The matching hypothesis argues that people are more likely to form and succeed in a committed relationship with someone who is equally socially desirable, typically in the form of physical attraction. The hypothesis is derived from the discipline of social psychology and was first proposed by American social psychologist Elaine Hatfield and her colleagues in 1966.

Interpersonal attraction, as a part of social psychology, is the study of the attraction between people which leads to the development of platonic or romantic relationships. It is distinct from perceptions such as physical attractiveness, and involves views of what is and what is not considered beautiful or attractive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physical attractiveness</span> Aesthetic assessment of physical traits

Physical attractiveness is the degree to which a person's physical features are considered aesthetically pleasing or beautiful. The term often implies sexual attractiveness or desirability, but can also be distinct from either. There are many factors which influence one person's attraction to another, with physical aspects being one of them. Physical attraction itself includes universal perceptions common to all human cultures such as facial symmetry, sociocultural dependent attributes, and personal preferences unique to a particular individual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Buss</span> American evolutionary psychologist

David Michael Buss is an American evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas at Austin, researching human sex differences in mate selection. He is considered one of the founders of evolutionary psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual jealousy</span> Psychological concept

Sexual jealousy is a special form of jealousy in sexual relationships, based on suspected or imminent sexual infidelity. The concept is studied in the field of evolutionary psychology.

Human male sexuality encompasses a wide variety of feelings and behaviors. Men's feelings of attraction may be caused by various physical and social traits of their potential partner. Men's sexual behavior can be affected by many factors, including evolved predispositions, individual personality, upbringing, and culture. While most men are heterosexual, there are minorities of homosexual men and varying degrees of bisexual men.

A cross-sex friendship is a platonic relationship between two unrelated people of differing sexes or gender. There are multiple types of cross-sex friendships, all defined by whether or not each party has a romantic attraction to each other, or perceives that the other is interested. A few theories have been developed to explain the existence of such friendships. Research has been done on why men and women initiate these relationships, how they are perceived by others, implications for children with cross-sex friendships, among others. Cross-sex friendships can also create problems for those involved if either or both have or ever had any romantic feelings for the other.

"Nice guy" is an informal term, commonly used with either a literal or a sarcastic meaning, for a man.

In psychology, misattribution of arousal is the process whereby people make a mistake in assuming what is causing them to feel aroused. For example, when actually experiencing physiological responses related to fear, people mislabel those responses as romantic arousal. The reason physiological symptoms may be attributed to incorrect stimuli is because many stimuli have similar physiological symptoms such as increased blood pressure or shortness of breath.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in humans</span> Evolutionary effects of sexual selection on humans

Sexual selection in humans concerns the concept of sexual selection, introduced by Charles Darwin as an element of his theory of natural selection, as it affects humans. Sexual selection is a biological way one sex chooses a mate for the best reproductive success. Most compete with others of the same sex for the best mate to contribute their genome for future generations. This has shaped human evolution for many years, but reasons why humans choose their mates are not fully understood. Sexual selection is quite different in non-human animals than humans as they feel more of the evolutionary pressures to reproduce and can easily reject a mate. The role of sexual selection in human evolution has not been firmly established although neoteny has been cited as being caused by human sexual selection. It has been suggested that sexual selection played a part in the evolution of the anatomically modern human brain, i.e. the structures responsible for social intelligence underwent positive selection as a sexual ornamentation to be used in courtship rather than for survival itself, and that it has developed in ways outlined by Ronald Fisher in the Fisherian runaway model. Fisher also stated that the development of sexual selection was "more favourable" in humans.

Odour is sensory stimulation of the olfactory membrane of the nose by a group of molecules. Certain body odours are connected to human sexual attraction. Humans can make use of body odour subconsciously to identify whether a potential mate will pass on favourable traits to their offspring. Body odour may provide significant cues about the genetic quality, health and reproductive success of a potential mate.

In psychology, a first impression is the event when one person first encounters another person and forms a mental image of that person. Impression accuracy varies depending on the observer and the target being observed. First impressions are based on a wide range of characteristics: age, race, culture, language, gender, physical appearance, accent, posture, voice, number of people present, economic status, and time allowed to process. The first impressions individuals give to others could greatly influence how they are treated and viewed in many contexts of everyday life.

Mate preferences in humans refers to why one human chooses or chooses not to mate with another human and their reasoning why. Men and women have been observed having different criteria as what makes a good or ideal mate. A potential mate's socioeconomic status has also been seen important, especially in developing areas where social status is more emphasized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human mating strategies</span> Courtship behavior of humans

In evolutionary psychology and behavioral ecology, human mating strategies are a set of behaviors used by individuals to select, attract, and retain mates. Mating strategies overlap with reproductive strategies, which encompass a broader set of behaviors involving the timing of reproduction and the trade-off between quantity and quality of offspring.

Mate value is derived from Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and sexual selection, as well as the social exchange theory of relationships. Mate value is defined as the sum of traits that are perceived as desirable, representing genetic quality and/or fitness, an indication of a potential mate's reproductive success. Based on mate desirability and mate preference, mate value underpins mate selection and the formation of romantic relationships.

Female intrasexual competition is competition between women over a potential mate. Such competition might include self-promotion, derogation of other women, and direct and indirect aggression toward other women. Factors that influence female intrasexual competition include the genetic quality of available mates, hormone levels, and interpersonal dynamics.

References

  1. ↑ Strain, Daniel. "The Red-Dress Effect".
  2. ↑ Williams, L. A.; Schofield, T. P.; Whitford, T. J. (2017). "Romantic Red: Testing the Characteristics of Color–Attraction Effects in a Novel Paradigm". Collabra: Psychology. 3 (1): 10. doi: 10.1525/collabra.54 .
  3. ↑ "Proximate causes of the red face of the bald uakari monkey" Authors P. Mayor, J. Mamani, D. Montes, C. González-Crespo, M. A. Sebastián, M. Bowler. Published 29 July 2015.DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150145
  4. ↑ Wickings, J. M. (2004). "Sexual swelling in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx): A test of the reliable indicator hypothesis". Behavioral Ecology. 15 (3): 438–445. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh027 .
  5. ↑ Dixson, A.F. (1983). Observations on the evolution and behavioral significance of "sexual skin" in female primates. Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 13. pp. 63–106. doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60286-7. ISBN   9780120045136.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Pazda, Adam D.; Greitemeyer, Tobias (2015), Elliot, Andrew J.; Franklin, Anna; Fairchild, Mark D. (eds.), "Color in romantic contexts in humans", Handbook of Color Psychology, Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 531–545, ISBN   978-1-107-33793-0 , retrieved 2023-03-13
  7. ↑ Hutchings, John (2004). "Color in folklore and tradition—The principles". Color Research and Application. 29: 57–66. doi:10.1002/col.10212.
  8. ↑ Low, B (1979). "Sexual selection and human ornamentation". In Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Irons, William (eds.). Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behaviour: An Anthropological Perspective. Duxbury. pp.  462–487. ISBN   978-0-87872-193-1.
  9. ↑ Pazda, Adam D.; Elliot, Andrew J.; Greitemeyer, Tobias (2011). "Sexy red: Perceived sexual receptivity mediates the red-attraction relation in men viewing woman". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48 (3): 787. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.009.
  10. ↑ "Red Enhances Men's Attraction To Women, Psychological Study Reveals". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  11. 1 2 Francis, G (2013). "Publication bias in "Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men," by Elliot et al. (2010)". Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 142 (1): 292–6. doi:10.1037/a0027923. PMID   23398185.
  12. 1 2 Elliot, Andrew J.; Niesta Kayser, Daniela; Greitemeyer, Tobias; Lichtenfeld, Stephanie; Gramzow, Richard H.; Maier, Markus A.; Liu, Huijun (2010). "Red, Rank, and Romance in Women Viewing Men". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 139 (3): 399–417. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.335.828 . doi:10.1037/a0019689. PMID   20677892.
  13. ↑ "Women attracted to men in red, research shows". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2023-04-18.
  14. ↑ Wagge, Jordan R.; Baciu, Cristina; Banas, Kasia; Nadler, Joel T.; Schwarz, Sascha; Weisberg, Yanna; IJzerman, Hans; Legate, Nicole; Grahe, Jon (2019-01-01). "A Demonstration of the Collaborative Replication and Education Project: Replication Attempts of the Red-Romance Effect". Collabra: Psychology. 5 (1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.177 . ISSN   2474-7394. S2CID   150104960.
  15. ↑ Radoja, Dukata (2015-10-29). "The Role of Counselling in Medical Settings". Proceedings of the 3rd Human and Social Sciences at the Common Conference. Vol. 3. pp. 28–30. doi:10.18638/hassacc.2015.3.1.169. ISBN   978-80-554-1124-8.
  16. ↑ Peperkoorn, L. S.; Roberts, S. C.; Pollet, T. V. (2016). "Revisiting the Red Effect on Attractiveness and Sexual Receptivity: No Effect of the Color Red on Human Mate Preferences" (PDF). Evolutionary Psychology. 14 (October–December 2016): 1–13. doi: 10.1177/1474704916673841 .
  17. ↑ Williams, L. A.; Schofield, T. P.; Whitford, T. J. (2017). "Romantic Red: Testing the Characteristics of Color–Attraction Effects in a Novel Paradigm". Collabra: Psychology. 3 (1): 10. doi: 10.1525/collabra.54 .
  18. ↑ Jung, Ilyung; Kim, Myung Shik; Han, Kwanghee (2011). "Red for Romance, Blue for Memory". In Stephanidis, Constantine (ed.). HCI International 2011 – Posters' Extended Abstracts. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Vol. 173. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 284–288. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22098-2_57 . ISBN   978-3-642-22098-2. S2CID   365542.
  19. ↑ Winskel, Heather; Forrester, Declan; Hong, Madelyn; O'Connor, Kourtney (2021-07-04). "Seeing red as anger or romance: an emotion categorisation task". Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 33 (5): 581–594. doi:10.1080/20445911.2021.1936538. ISSN   2044-5911. S2CID   236273286.
  20. ↑ Pazda, Adam D.; Elliot, Andrew J. (2017-06-01). "Processing the Word Red can Enhance Women's Perceptions of Men's Attractiveness". Current Psychology. 36 (2): 316–323. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9420-8. ISSN   1936-4733. S2CID   255510631.
  21. ↑ Elliot, Andrew J.; Greitemeyer, Tobias; Pazda, Adam D. (2013-05-01). "Women's use of red clothing as a sexual signal in intersexual interaction". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49 (3): 599–602. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.001. ISSN   0022-1031.
  22. 1 2 Berthold, Anne; Reese, Gerhard; Martin, Judith (August 2017). "The effect of red color on perceived self-attractiveness: Red color and self-attractiveness". European Journal of Social Psychology. 47 (5): 645–652. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2238.
  23. ↑ Berthold, Anne (10 February 2022). "Want to impress on Valentine's Day? Then make sure to wear red". The Conversation. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  24. 1 2 3 Elliot, Andrew J.; Tracy, Jessica L.; Pazda, Adam D.; Beall, Alec T. (2013-01-01). "Red enhances women's attractiveness to men: First evidence suggesting universality". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49 (1): 165–168. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.017. ISSN   0022-1031.
  25. 1 2 3 Wen, Fangfang; Zuo, Bin; Wu, Yang; Sun, Shan; Liu, Ke (2014-10-01). "Red is Romantic, but Only for Feminine Females: Sexual Dimorphism Moderates Red Effect on Sexual Attraction". Evolutionary Psychology. 12 (4): 719–735. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200404 . ISSN   1474-7049. PMC   10480888 . PMID   25300050. S2CID   11162521.
  26. 1 2 Williams, Lisa A.; Schofield, Timothy P.; Whitford, Thomas J. (2017). "Romantic Red: Testing the Characteristics of Color–Attraction Effects in a Novel Paradigm". Collabra: Psychology. 3. doi: 10.1525/collabra.54 . Retrieved 2023-03-14.
  27. 1 2 Young, Steven G. (March 2015). "The effect of red on male perceptions of female attractiveness: Moderation by baseline attractiveness of female faces: Red and attractiveness". European Journal of Social Psychology. 45 (2): 146–151. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2098.
  28. ↑ Dolan, Eric W. (2019-11-30). "Psychology study shows how using the color red to increase attractiveness can backfire". PsyPost. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  29. 1 2 3 Lehmann, Gabrielle K.; Elliot, Andrew J.; Calin-Jageman, Robert J. (2018-10-01). "Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Red on Perceived Attractiveness". Evolutionary Psychology. 16 (4): 147470491880241. doi: 10.1177/1474704918802412 . ISSN   1474-7049. PMC   10480976 . PMID   30282470. S2CID   52914436.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.