Restoration economy

Last updated

The restoration economy is the economic activity associated with regenerative land use, such as ecological restoration activities. It stands in contrast to economic activity premised on sprawl, or on the extraction or depletion of natural resources. The term is meant to convey that activities meant to repair past damage to natural and human communities are often economically beneficial at local, regional, and national scales.

Contents

Overview

The "restoration economy" refers to an economic model based on repurposing, renewing and reconnecting the natural, built and socioeconomic environments. The phrase gained popularity with the publication in 2002 of The Restoration Economy by Storm Cunningham. That book created an eight-sector taxonomy for "restorative development", with a chapter on each. Four professional / technical / scientific sectors primarily focused on the built environment: brownfield remediation, infrastructure renewal, heritage restoration and catastrophe reconstruction. The other four sectors primarily focused on the natural environment: ecological restoration, watershed restoration, fishery restoration and regenerative agriculture. All eight sectors help to revitalize the socioeconomic environment.

On the natural resources side of the equation, the "restoration economy" refers to the employment, capital, resources, and economic activity that emerge from investments in ecological restoration, or "the process of assisting the recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged, or destroyed." [1] Restoration projects can include habitat enhancement, water quality improvement, invasive species removal, forest thinning for canopy diversification, or any other activity that aims to improve the natural function of an ecosystem. While investments in restoration benefit the environment, restoration projects also require workers, materials, and services to implement. The marketplace for these goods and services can create employment, spur business and workforce development, and increase activity in local economies. Activities that use byproducts of restoration work are also sometimes considered as part of the restoration economy; for example, the use of small trees and/or shrubs from forest diversification or thinning projects as biomass to produce heat or energy.

Wetland area restoration 439362435 Jb6zZ-O.jpg
Wetland area restoration

History

The emergence of the restoration economy as a concept followed closely from historic shifts in natural resource policy in the mid-1990s, when the northern spotted owl and several species of salmon with habitat in the Pacific Northwest of North America were listed as endangered. The listings created a significant shift in forest management policies across the region, leading to drastic decreases in logging and other natural resource extraction activities that would further destroy habitats for these species. [2] [3] The listings also marked a shift toward more sustainable land management through forest and watershed restoration, as policymakers began to realize that environmental restoration work could provide social and economic, in addition to ecological, benefits. [4]

Federal and state agencies sought to replace some of the economic activity that was lost as extraction activities declined with economic activity from restoration work. The Northwest Forest Plan (1994) initiated several programs intended to transition traditional logging communities and workforces toward livelihoods in restoration work. [5] [6] The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Act (2009), the National Forest Economic Action Plan, and stewardship contracting opportunities also focus on marrying ecological with socioeconomic benefits from national forest management.

In Oregon, decreased timber yields and the potential for additional salmon listings that would further affect traditional land management activities led to the creation of community-based watershed councils under the Oregon Watershed Health Program (1993), and later the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds (1997). With dedicated state lottery funding, these watershed councils continue to promote voluntary restoration actions that improve salmon habitat by encouraging collaboration at the local level and promoting both socioeconomic and ecological benefits through restoration. [7] [8]

Businesses, employees, and working conditions

Agencies and nongovernmental organizations that implement restoration work create employment by hiring staff and contracting with businesses that hire employees to perform the actual restoration work. In Oregon, contracting businesses involved in restoration projects tend to be small businesses (as defined by the Small Business Administration), family-owned, and subject to large seasonal fluctuations in available work. Differences among businesses in the state appear to be related to customer base—businesses that work for non-federal customers such as watershed councils tend to perform more equipment-based work close to their home, versus businesses working for federal agencies who tend to travel more often and perform more labor-intensive work. [9] These findings have important implications, as restoration investments are frequently intended to increase economic activity in rural communities affected by decreased logging activity, and these benefits are lost to local economies if contractors from outside of the area capture the contract. In addition, labor-intensive activities (e.g. planting trees, thinning) tend to pay less than traditional logging jobs, be less reliable, and be dominated by immigrant workers. [10] In equipment-based and technically intensive restoration activities, working conditions are generally thought to be better. [11]

Measuring economic activity

Adding protection to saplings for a healthy and ensured growth 439347908 qYXkb-O.jpg
Adding protection to saplings for a healthy and ensured growth

United States

Several studies have examined the economic impacts and activity created by restoration work in numbers. These have typically been for individual projects, e.g. a large hazardous fuels reduction contract in Arizona, [12] or a $113 million mine reclamation project in Montana that was estimated to generate a total of 3,563 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. [13] A study looking at the economic out of a restoration program across an entire county (Humboldt County, California) determined that the $12.5 million invested in the program in 2002 supported 300 direct jobs that year. [14] A study that looked at investments in restoration projects through both federal agencies and nongovernmental organizations across the state of Oregon found that restoration investments have similar economic and employment impacts as other public infrastructure projects such as road building. Per million invested, 15-24 jobs were created, and each invested dollar generated an additional 1.4 to 2.4 dollars in economic activity as it cycled through the economy, depending on the specific type of project. [15]

Workers, or restoration practitioners, in the restoration economy are also vulnerable to policy changes, and the "volatility of restoration funding." In Humboldt County, California, private sector businesses and non-governmental organizations are often compromising with bureaucratic hindrances and drastic changes in funding. [16]

South Africa

Restoration economy has been implemented in South Africa as well. For example, the ARISE Project in the Giyani district of the Limpopo province, was a poverty-alleviation program contracted to a private company in 1999 by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, with the intention of raising the overall quality of life in that region. The program created jobs in ecological restoration of the surrounding landscape and helped to economically empower rural Africans in the short run. Restoration activities included creating fences around off-limit areas, planting approximately 8000 trees and creating a fifty-meter buffer zone on both sides of the Klein Letaba River. Over 323 jobs were created, and employees were earning nearly twice the average daily income ($5.30 per household from $2.20). [17] In South Africa, while the ARISE project was able to positively affect the Giyani District by providing jobs for a short period to low-income earners, it did not increase the likelihood of long employment later in the commercial sector.

Namibia

In its efforts to control woody plant encroachment, the Namibian government deliberately supports the commercial utilisation of excess wood as an eocomic incentive and pull factor for restoration. This has resulted in the emergence of a so-called bush-biomass sector, boasting various different value chains. At the core of Namibia´s restoration economy approach is the sustainable harvesting of shrubs. Such harvesting is meant to reduce the density woody plants and allow for a better between grass and bushes in the affected savanna rangelands. A total of over 12,000 workers find employment in harvesting and processing of excess wood. [18] [19] [20] It was estimated that the bush control and utilisaiton could lead to an aggregated net benefit of around USD 3.8 billion over a time period of 25 years, taking into consideration . [21]

Ongoing benefits

Although the potential exists for a win-win situation pairing environmental betterment with socioeconomic benefits, the dual-benefits potential from this kind of work is often overlooked or under-emphasized. [22] [23] Like its emergence from policy with aims to provide socioeconomic benefits in concert with natural resource work, a robust and enduring restoration economy depends on policy that continues to prioritize multiple benefits for both human and natural systems, in addition to initiating investments in restoration activities. Indices of performance and knowledge of the traits associated with successful establishment and persistence in restored vegetation are potentially of great benefit to practitioners and policymakers involved in restoration increased land productivity, enhanced groundwater recharge, woody utilisation and carbon offsets. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natural capital</span> Worlds stock of natural resources

Natural capital is the world's stock of natural resources, which includes geology, soils, air, water and all living organisms. Some natural capital assets provide people with free goods and services, often called ecosystem services. All of these underpin our economy and society, and thus make human life possible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forestry</span> Science and craft of managing woodlands

Forestry is the science and craft of creating, managing, planting, using, conserving and repairing forests and woodlands for associated resources for human and environmental benefits. Forestry is practiced in plantations and natural stands. The science of forestry has elements that belong to the biological, physical, social, political and managerial sciences. Forest management plays an essential role in the creation and modification of habitats and affects ecosystem services provisioning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Logging</span> Process of cutting, processing, and moving trees

Logging is the process of cutting, processing, and moving trees to a location for transport. It may include skidding, on-site processing, and loading of trees or logs onto trucks or skeleton cars. In forestry, the term logging is sometimes used narrowly to describe the logistics of moving wood from the stump to somewhere outside the forest, usually a sawmill or a lumber yard. In common usage, however, the term may cover a range of forestry or silviculture activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitat conservation</span> Management practice for protecting types of environments

Habitat conservation is a management practice that seeks to conserve, protect and restore habitats and prevent species extinction, fragmentation or reduction in range. It is a priority of many groups that cannot be easily characterized in terms of any one ideology.

A green economy is an economy that aims at reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities, and that aims for sustainable development without degrading the environment. It is closely related with ecological economics, but has a more politically applied focus. The 2011 UNEP Green Economy Report argues "that to be green, an economy must not only be efficient, but also fair. Fairness implies recognizing global and country level equity dimensions, particularly in assuring a Just Transition to an economy that is low-carbon, resource efficient, and socially inclusive."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental resource management</span> Type of resource management

Environmental resource management or environmental management is the management of the interaction and impact of human societies on the environment. It is not, as the phrase might suggest, the management of the environment itself. Environmental resources management aims to ensure that ecosystem services are protected and maintained for future human generations, and also maintain ecosystem integrity through considering ethical, economic, and scientific (ecological) variables. Environmental resource management tries to identify factors between meeting needs and protecting resources. It is thus linked to environmental protection, resource management, sustainability, integrated landscape management, natural resource management, fisheries management, forest management, wildlife management, environmental management systems, and others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecological engineering</span> Environmental engineering

Ecological engineering uses ecology and engineering to predict, design, construct or restore, and manage ecosystems that integrate "human society with its natural environment for the benefit of both".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecosystem service</span> Benefits provided by healthy nature, forests and environmental systems

Ecosystem services are the various benefits that humans derive from healthy ecosystems. These ecosystems, when functioning well, offer such things as provision of food, natural pollination of crops, clean air and water, decomposition of wastes, or flood control. Ecosystem services are grouped into four broad categories of services. There are provisioning services, such as the production of food and water. Regulating services, such as the control of climate and disease. Supporting services, such as nutrient cycles and oxygen production. And finally there are cultural services, such as spiritual and recreational benefits. Evaluations of ecosystem services may include assigning an economic value to them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natural resource management</span>

Natural resource management (NRM) is the management of natural resources such as land, water, soil, plants and animals, with a particular focus on how management affects the quality of life for both present and future generations (stewardship).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green-collar worker</span> Environmental-sector worker

A green-collar worker is a worker who is employed in an environmental sector of the economy. Environmental green-collar workers satisfy the demand for green development. Generally, they implement environmentally conscious design, policy, and technology to improve conservation and sustainability. Formal environmental regulations as well as informal social expectations are pushing many firms to seek professionals with expertise with environmental, energy efficiency, and clean renewable energy issues. They often seek to make their output more sustainable, and thus more favorable to public opinion, governmental regulation, and the Earth's ecology.

Ecotrust is a nonprofit organization based in Portland, Oregon, working to create social, economic, and environmental benefit.

Green jobs are, according to the United Nations Environment Program, "work in agricultural, manufacturing, research and development (R&D), administrative, and service activities that contribute(s) substantially to preserving or restoring environmental quality. Specifically, but not exclusively, this includes jobs that help to protect ecosystems and biodiversity; reduce energy, materials, and water consumption through high efficiency strategies; de-carbonize the economy; and minimize or altogether avoid generation of all forms of waste and pollution." The environmental sector has the dual benefit of mitigating environmental challenges as well as helping economic growth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Payment for ecosystem services</span>

Payments for ecosystem services (PES), also known as payments for environmental services, are incentives offered to farmers or landowners in exchange for managing their land to provide some sort of ecological service. They have been defined as "a transparent system for the additional provision of environmental services through conditional payments to voluntary providers". These programmes promote the conservation of natural resources in the marketplace.

<i>The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity</i>

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) was a study led by Pavan Sukhdev from 2007 to 2011. It is an international initiative to draw attention to the global economic benefits of biodiversity. Its objective is to highlight the growing cost of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation and to draw together expertise from the fields of science, economics and policy to enable practical actions. TEEB aims to assess, communicate and mainstream the urgency of actions through its five deliverables—D0: science and economic foundations, policy costs and costs of inaction, D1: policy opportunities for national and international policy-makers, D2: decision support for local administrators, D3: business risks, opportunities and metrics and D4: citizen and consumer ownership.

Earth Economics is a 501(c)(3) non-profit formally established in 2004 and headquartered in Tacoma, Washington, United States. The organization uses natural capital valuation to help decision makers and local stakeholders to understand the value of natural capital assets. By identifying, monetizing, and valuing natural capital and ecosystem services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forest restoration</span>

Forest restoration is defined as "actions to re-instate ecological processes, which accelerate recovery of forest structure, ecological functioning and biodiversity levels towards those typical of climax forest", i.e. the end-stage of natural forest succession. Climax forests are relatively stable ecosystems that have developed the maximum biomass, structural complexity and species diversity that are possible within the limits imposed by climate and soil and without continued disturbance from humans. Climax forest is therefore the target ecosystem, which defines the ultimate aim of forest restoration. Since climate is a major factor that determines climax forest composition, global climate change may result in changing restoration aims. Additionally, the potential impacts of climate change on restoration goals must be taken into account, as changes in temperature and precipitation patterns may alter the composition and distribution of climax forests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pavan Sukhdev</span> Indian environmental economist (born 1960)

Pavan Sukhdev is an Indian environmental economist whose field of studies include green economy and international finance. He was the Special Adviser and Head of UNEP's Green Economy Initiative, a major UN project suite to demonstrate that greening of economies is not a burden on growth but rather a new engine for growing wealth, increasing decent employment, and reducing persistent poverty. Pavan was also the Study Leader for the ground breaking TEEB study commissioned by G8+5 and hosted by UNEP. Under his leadership, TEEB sized the global problem of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation in economic and human welfare terms, and proposed solutions targeted at policy-makers, administrators, businesses and citizens. TEEB presented its widely acclaimed Final Report suite at the UN meeting by Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Nagoya, Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in British Columbia</span>

Deforestation in British Columbia has resulted in a net loss of 1.06 million hectares of tree cover between the years 2000 and 2020. More traditional losses have been exacerbated by increased threats from climate change driven fires, increased human activity, and invasive species. The introduction of sustainable forestry efforts such as the Zero Net Deforestation Act seeks to reduce the rate of forest cover loss. In British Columbia, forests cover over 55 million hectares, which is 57.9% of British Columbia's 95 million hectares of land. The forests are mainly composed of coniferous trees, such as pines, spruces and firs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrews Forest</span>

The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, commonly referred to as Andrews Forest, is located near Blue River, Oregon, United States, and is managed cooperatively by the United States Forest Service's Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University, and the Willamette National Forest. It was one of only 610 UNESCO International Biosphere Reserves, until being withdrawn from the program as of June 14, 2017, and a Long Term Ecological Research site. It is situated in the middle of the Western Cascades.

Natural capital accounting is the process of calculating the total stocks and flows of natural resources and services in a given ecosystem or region. Accounting for such goods may occur in physical or monetary terms. This process can subsequently inform government, corporate and consumer decision making as each relates to the use or consumption of natural resources and land, and sustainable behaviour.

References

  1. ↑ Society for Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group, 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International. Available from http://www.ser.org. Accessed in December 2013.
  2. ↑ Rey Benayas, J. M., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., and Bullock J. M. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325:1121-1124.doi:10.1126/science.1172460
  3. ↑ Yaffee, S. L. 1994. "The wisdom of the spotted owl: policy lessons for a new century." Island Press, Washington, D.C.
  4. ↑ Nielsen-Pincus, Max, and Cassandra Moseley. 2013. "The Economic Impacts of a Sustained Program of Forest and Watershed Restoration." Restoration Ecology 21(2): 207–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00885.x.
  5. ↑ Nelson, P. B. 2002. Perceptions of restructuring in the rural west: insights from the "cultural turn". Society and Natural Resources 15:903–921. doi: 10.1080/08941920290107648
  6. ↑ Haynes, R. W. 2002. "Forest management in the 21st century: changing numbers, changing context". Journal of Forestry 101:38–43.
  7. ↑ Moseley, C., and Shankle, S. 2001. "Who gets the work? National forest contracting in the Pacific Northwest." Journal of Forestry 99 (9):32-37.
  8. ↑ Ellison, A., F. MacDonald, M. Nielsen-Pincus, and C. Moseley. 2010. "The business of restoration: A profile of restoration contractors in Oregon." Ecosystem Workforce Program Working Paper #23. University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
  9. ↑ Wagner, B. and R. Shropshire. 2009. "An estimation of the economic impacts of restoration in Montana." Helena, MT: Department of Natural Resources and Conservation and Montana Department of Labor and Industry.
  10. ↑ Nielsen-Pincus, M., and C. Moseley. 2010. "The economic and employment impacts of forest and watershed restoration in Oregon." Ecosystem Workforce Program Working Paper #24. University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
  11. ↑ Baker, M. 2004. "Socioeconomic characteristics of the natural resource restoration system in Humboldt County, California." Taylorsville, CA: Forest Community Research.
  12. ↑ Daniels, Steven E.; Corinne L. Gobeli; and Angela J. Findley. 2000. "Reemployment Programs for Dislocated Timber Workers: Lessons from Oregon." Society and Natural Resources 13:135–150. doi:10.1080/089419200279153.
  13. ↑ Dillingham, Candace. 2006. "Community Economic Assistance Programs." In Northwest Forest Plan—The First 10 Years (1994–2003): Socioeconomic Monitoring Results. Vol. III, 89–100, edited by Susan Charnley. General Technical Report PNW-GTR 649. Portland OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
  14. ↑ Sarathy, Brinda. 2012. Pineros: Latino Labour and the Changing Face of Forestry in the Pacific Northwest. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press
  15. ↑ Moseley, Cassandra, and Y. Reyes. 2007. "Comparing Job Quality in Logging and Forestry Services in Oregon." Journal of Forestry 105(6): 293-300.
  16. ↑ Baker, J. M., & Quinn-Davidson, L. N. 2011.Jobs and Community in Humboldt County, California. In Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration (pp. 221-237). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.
  17. ↑ Blignaut, James, Jotte van Ierland, Travor Xivuri, Rudi van Aarde, and James Aronson. 2011. "The ARISE Project in South Africa." In Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration, pp. 207-219. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.
  18. ↑ Stoldt, Ina Wilkie and Mirja. "The story of Namibian bush: Turning problems into opportunities". Conservation Namibia. Retrieved 2024-04-19.
  19. ↑ "Namibian Bush Biomass: An Ecosystem Restoration Solution | PANORAMA". panorama.solutions. Retrieved 2024-04-19.
  20. ↑ Charis, Gratitude; Danha, Gwiranai; Muzenda, Edison (2019). "Waste valorisation opportunities for bush encroacher biomass in savannah ecosystems: A comparative case analysis of Botswana and Namibia". Procedia Manufacturing. 35: 974–979. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.044 . ISSN   2351-9789.
  21. ↑ Birch, C.; Harper-Simmonds, L.; Lindeque, P.; Middleton, A. (2017). Benefits of bush control in Namibia. A national economic study for Namibia and a case for the Otjozondjupa Region (PDF) (Report). Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) Initiative.
  22. ↑ Hjerpe, Evan E., and Yeon-Su Kim. 2008. "Economic Impacts of Southwestern National Forest Fuels Reductions." Journal of Forestry 106(6): 311–316.
  23. ↑ Aronson, James; James N. Blignaut; Suzanne J. Milton; et al. 2010. "Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta-analysis of Recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals." Restoration Ecology 18(2):143–154. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00638.x
  24. ↑ Pywell, Richard F.; Bullock, James M.; Roy, David B.; Warman, Liz; Walker, Kevin J.; Rothery, Peter (February 2003). "Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration: Plant traits as predictors of performance". Journal of Applied Ecology. 40 (1): 65–77. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00762.x.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.