Sexual strategies theory

Last updated

Sexual strategies theory (SST) is an evolutionary theory of human mating created by David Buss and David Schmitt in 1993. It defines the set of mating strategies that humans pursue, the adaptive problems that men and women face when pursuing these strategies, and the evolved solutions to these mating problems. [1]

Contents

Introduction

In 1993, David Buss and David Schmitt proposed sexual strategies theory as an extension of parental investment theory (1972) by Robert Trivers. [2] Strategies are defined as behavioural solutions to adaptive problems. It does not imply conscious planning or awareness by the individual. [3] Buss explained: "It may seem odd to view human mating, romance, sex, and love as inherently strategic. But humans, like other sexually reproducing species, do not choose mates randomly. We do not attract mates indiscriminately." [4]

Before SST, human mating theories focused almost exclusively on long-term mating and neglected short-term mating as a common feature in most cultures. [5] SST begins with two critical variables that influence mating behaviour. The first is the temporal dimension (time span), which ranges from short-term to long-term mating. [6] Short-term mating involves relatively fleeting sexual encounters such as casual sex, one-night stands, and brief affairs. [7] Long-term mating is a prolonged commitment to a partner that lasts years, decades, or a lifetime. Matings of intermediate duration, which may involve dating, "going steady", and brief marriages, fall between these points. The second variable is biological sex: whether one is male or female. [6]

Premises

SST has 12 core premises: [8]

  1. Humans have evolved multiple mating strategies.
  2. Each strategy has specialised design features.
  3. Men and women are strategically similar in some domains.
  4. Men and women differ in strategies where they have recurrently faced different adaptive problems.
  5. Sex differences in minimum obligatory parental investment and sexual selection have fashioned sex-differentiated forms of short-term mating.
  6. Access to fertile women has historically been a key constraint on men's reproductive success, so selection has favoured a psychology of short-term mating specially designed to overcome this constraint.
  7. Women obtain several key adaptive benefits from short-term mating.
  8. Men and women have evolved long-term pair-bonded mating strategies that possess at least five common components. They are identifying potential partners who have: (a) a similar mate value as their own; (b) a willingness to commit over the long-term; (c) good long-term partner qualities including an altruistically skewed welfare trade-off ratio (WTR); (d) good parenting skills; and (e) are not encumbered by costly commitments.
  9. There are male-specific challenges of long-term mating.
  10. There are female-specific challenges of long-term mating.
  11. The deployment of different sexual strategies is highly context dependent.
  12. Sexual strategies are evolved solutions to common and sex-differentiated challenges of human mating.

Contextual influences

Many factors influence mating strategies. [9] When there is a female-skewed operational sex ratio, men tend to shift to brief encounters since they have more opportunities to satisfy their desire for variety. Conversely, when there is a surplus of men, both sexes shift towards a long-term mating strategy. A male surplus also predicts polyandry. The dark triad of personality traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—is associated with exploitative short-term mating tactics, deception, and coercion. When there is a greater prevalence of parasites, people place more importance on physical attractiveness since parasites are known to degrade physical appearance.

Alternative explanations

Social role theory (or the social structural model) is a rival theory by Alice Eagly and Wendy Wood. According to Fletcher et al. (2019):

Unlike sexual strategies theory, the social structural model posits that evolutionary forces did not produce psychological adaptations in the mind or brain that direct the way in which women and men make decisions about sex and mating. Thus, sexual selection occurred below the neck. [...] Differences between these theories have led to some lively exchanges in the literature. Both theories have their limitations, but, given the evidence... we believe that sexual selection processes over the long course of evolution was likely to have molded both the body and the mind (or brain) in humans. Although culture certainly plays a major role in influencing sexual strategies, biological evolution has left its footprints all over both the intimate relationship body and mind. [10]

Contrary to the predictions of social role theory, sex differences tend to be larger in more gender egalitarian cultures. [11]

Related Research Articles

Evolutionary psychology is a theoretical approach in psychology that examines cognition and behavior from a modern evolutionary perspective. It seeks to identify human psychological adaptations with regards to the ancestral problems they evolved to solve. In this framework, psychological traits and mechanisms are either functional products of natural and sexual selection or non-adaptive by-products of other adaptive traits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seduction</span> Enticing a person to sexual behaviour

In sexuality, seduction means enticing someone else into sexual intercourse or other sexual activity. Strategies of seduction include conversation and sexual scripts, paralingual features, non-verbal communication, and short-term behavioural strategies.

Sociosexuality, sometimes called sociosexual orientation, is the individual difference in the willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship. Individuals who are more restricted sociosexually are less willing to engage in casual sex; they prefer greater love, commitment and emotional closeness before having sex with romantic partners. Individuals who are more unrestricted sociosexually are more willing to have casual sex and are more comfortable engaging in sex without love, commitment or closeness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociobiological theories of rape</span> Theories about how evolutionary adaptation influences the psychology of rapists

Sociobiological theories of rape explore how evolutionary adaptation influences the psychology of rapists. Such theories are highly controversial, as traditional theories typically do not consider rape a behavioral adaptation. Some object to such theories on ethical, religious, political, or scientific grounds. Others argue correct knowledge of rape causes is necessary for effective preventive measures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Buss</span> American evolutionary psychologist (born 1953)

David Michael Buss is an American evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas at Austin, researching human sex differences in mate selection. He is considered one of the founders of evolutionary psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parental investment</span> Parental expenditure (e.g. time, energy, resources) that benefits offspring

Parental investment, in evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology, is any parental expenditure that benefits offspring. Parental investment may be performed by both males and females, females alone or males alone. Care can be provided at any stage of the offspring's life, from pre-natal to post-natal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Psychological adaptation</span> Psychological theory

A psychological adaptation is a functional, cognitive or behavioral trait that benefits an organism in its environment. Psychological adaptations fall under the scope of evolved psychological mechanisms (EPMs), however, EPMs refer to a less restricted set. Psychological adaptations include only the functional traits that increase the fitness of an organism, while EPMs refer to any psychological mechanism that developed through the processes of evolution. These additional EPMs are the by-product traits of a species’ evolutionary development, as well as the vestigial traits that no longer benefit the species’ fitness. It can be difficult to tell whether a trait is vestigial or not, so some literature is more lenient and refers to vestigial traits as adaptations, even though they may no longer have adaptive functionality. For example, xenophobic attitudes and behaviors, some have claimed, appear to have certain EPM influences relating to disease aversion, however, in many environments these behaviors will have a detrimental effect on a person's fitness. The principles of psychological adaptation rely on Darwin's theory of evolution and are important to the fields of evolutionary psychology, biology, and cognitive science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual jealousy</span> Psychological concept

Sexual jealousy is a special form of jealousy in sexual relationships, based on suspected or imminent sexual infidelity. The concept is studied in the field of evolutionary psychology.

Human male sexuality encompasses a wide variety of feelings and behaviors. Men's feelings of attraction may be caused by various physical and social traits of their potential partner. Men's sexual behavior can be affected by many factors, including evolved predispositions, individual personality, upbringing, and culture. While most men are heterosexual, there are minorities of homosexual men and varying degrees of bisexual men.

Evolutionary psychology seeks to identify and understand human psychological traits that have evolved in much the same way as biological traits, through adaptation to environmental cues. Furthermore, it tends toward viewing the vast majority of psychological traits, certainly the most important ones, as the result of past adaptions, which has generated significant controversy and criticism from competing fields. These criticisms include disputes about the testability of evolutionary hypotheses, cognitive assumptions such as massive modularity, vagueness stemming from assumptions about the environment that leads to evolutionary adaptation, the importance of non-genetic and non-adaptive explanations, as well as political and ethical issues in the field itself.

Error management theory (EMT) is an approach to perception and cognition biases originally coined by David Buss and Martie Haselton. Error management training is a related area that uses this theory. The objective of it is to encourage trainees to make errors and encourage them in reflection to understand the causes of those errors and to identify suitable strategies to avoid making them in future.

In sexual relationships between men and women, concepts of age disparity, including what defines an age disparity, have developed over time and vary among societies. Differences in age preferences for mates can stem from partner availability, gender roles, and evolutionary mating strategies, and age preferences in sexual partners may vary cross-culturally. There are also social theories for age differences in relationships as well as suggested reasons for 'alternative' age-hypogamous relationships. Age-disparate relationships have been documented for most of recorded history and have been regarded with a wide range of attitudes dependent on sociocultural norms and legal systems.

The history of evolutionary psychology began with Charles Darwin, who said that humans have social instincts that evolved by natural selection. Darwin's work inspired later psychologists such as William James and Sigmund Freud but for most of the 20th century psychologists focused more on behaviorism and proximate explanations for human behavior. E. O. Wilson's landmark 1975 book, Sociobiology, synthesized recent theoretical advances in evolutionary theory to explain social behavior in animals, including humans. Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides and John Tooby popularized the term "evolutionary psychology" in their 1992 book The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and The Generation of Culture. Like sociobiology before it, evolutionary psychology has been embroiled in controversy, but evolutionary psychologists see their field as gaining increased acceptance overall.

The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology are the general and specific scientific theories that explain the ultimate origins of psychological traits in terms of evolution. These theories originated with Charles Darwin's work, including his speculations about the evolutionary origins of social instincts in humans. Modern evolutionary psychology, however, is possible only because of advances in evolutionary theory in the 20th century.

Mate preferences in humans refers to why one human chooses or chooses not to mate with another human and their reasoning why. Men and women have been observed having different criteria as what makes a good or ideal mate. A potential mate's socioeconomic status has also been seen important, especially in developing areas where social status is more emphasized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human mating strategies</span> Courtship behavior of humans

In evolutionary psychology and behavioral ecology, human mating strategies are a set of behaviors used by individuals to select, attract, and retain mates. Mating strategies overlap with reproductive strategies, which encompass a broader set of behaviors involving the timing of reproduction and the trade-off between quantity and quality of offspring.

Strategic pluralism is a theory in evolutionary psychology regarding human mating strategies that suggests women have evolved to evaluate men in two categories: whether they are reliable long term providers, and whether they contain high quality genes. The theory of strategic pluralism was proposed by Steven Gangestad and Jeffry Simpson, two professors of psychology at the University of New Mexico and Texas A&M University, respectively.

Mate value is derived from Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and sexual selection, as well as the social exchange theory of relationships. Mate value is defined as the sum of traits that are perceived as desirable, representing genetic quality and/or fitness, an indication of a potential mate's reproductive success. Based on mate desirability and mate preference, mate value underpins mate selection and the formation of romantic relationships.

Female intrasexual competition is competition between women over a potential mate. Such competition might include self-promotion, derogation of other women, and direct and indirect aggression toward other women. Factors that influence female intrasexual competition include the genetic quality of available mates, hormone levels, and interpersonal dynamics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mate guarding in humans</span> Behaviours used to retain a mate

Human mate guarding refers to behaviours employed by both males and females with the aim of maintaining reproductive opportunities and sexual access to a mate. It involves discouraging the current mate from abandoning the relationship whilst also warding off intrasexual rivals. It has been observed in many non-human animals, as well as humans. Sexual jealousy is a prime example of mate guarding behaviour. Both males and females use different strategies to retain a mate and there is evidence that suggests resistance to mate guarding also exists.

References

  1. ↑ Cummings, Jorden A.; Sanders, Lee (2019). Introduction to Psychology . University of Saskatchewan Open Press. p. 158. ISBN   978-0-88880-637-6.
  2. ↑ Schmitt, David P. et al. (2003). "Universal Sex Differences in the Desire for Sexual Variety: Tests From 52 Nations, 6 Continents, and 13 Islands". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85 (1): 86. American Psychological Association. doi : 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.85.
  3. ↑ Petrinovich, Lewis (1995). Human Evolution, Reproduction, and Morality . Springer Science+Business Media. p. 101. ISBN   9781489913166.
  4. ↑ Buss, David M. (2003) [1994]. The Evolution of Desire (3rd ed.). Basic Books. p. 7. ISBN   9780465097760.
  5. ↑ Baumeister, Roy F.; Vohs, Kathleen D. (eds.) (2007). Encyclopedia of Social Psychology 1. SAGE Publications. p. 868. ISBN   978-1-4129-1670-7.
  6. 1 2 Buss, David M.; Schmitt, David P. (2016). "Sexual Strategies Theory". In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer International Publishing. doi : 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1861-1.
  7. ↑ Schmitt, David P. (2010). "Human Mate Choice". In Human Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press. p. 297. ISBN   978-0-521-87948-4.
  8. ↑ Buss & Schmitt 2018, pp. 23.5–23.6
  9. ↑ Buss & Schmitt 2018, p. 23.20
  10. ↑ Fletcher, Garth et al. (2019). The Science of Intimate Relationships (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 129–130. ISBN   9781119430049.
  11. ↑ Buss & Schmitt 2018, p. 23.25

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.