Show Me!

Last updated
Show Me!: A Picture Book of Sex for Children and Parents
Zeig Mal 2nd edition.jpg
Cover of 2nd German language edition (1990) which included new material on the AIDS epidemic
AuthorHelga Fleischhauer-Hardt
Original titleZeig mal. Ein Bilderbuch für Kinder und Eltern
TranslatorHilary Davies
Illustrator Will McBride
Cover artistWill McBride
CountryGermany
LanguageGerman
Subject Sex education
Genre Photo-book
PublisherJugenddienst, St. Martin's Press
Publication date
1974
Published in English
1975
Media typePrint (Hardcover)
Pages195 (176 eng. edition)
ISBN 3779573180
OCLC 74145406
LC Class 74-343028

Show Me! is a sex education book by photographer Will McBride. It appeared in 1974 in German under the title Zeig Mal!, written with psychiatrist Helga Fleischhauer-Hardt for children and their parents. It was translated into English a year later and was widely available in bookstores on both sides of the Atlantic for many years, but later became subject to expanded child pornography laws in jurisdictions including the United States. In Germany, the book was followed in 1990 by a second edition that included, among other additions, a discussion of the AIDS epidemic.

Contents

Publication history

While many parents appreciated Show Me! for its frank depiction of pre-adolescents discovering and exploring their sexuality, others called it child pornography. In 1975 and 1976, obscenity charges were brought against the publisher or booksellers by prosecutors in Massachusetts, [1] New Hampshire, [2] Oklahoma, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [3] In all four cases, the judges ruled as a matter of law that the title was not obscene. [4] [5] [6]

However, starting in 1977, some states began to criminalize the distribution of even non-obscene so-called "child pornography," or "images of abuse," which arguably is not protected by the First Amendment. New York State, home of the publisher, St. Martin's Press, criminalized the distribution of non-obscene "child pornography" in 1977, but the publisher promptly went to court and obtained an injunction against the State. The court granted the injunction because the First Amendment was interpreted to permit the banning of only obscene material. [7]

In 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision, New York v. Ferber , [8] which allowed the government to constitutionally ban the knowing distribution of even non-obscene "child pornography". Citing a chilling effect, St. Martin's Press then pulled the book, stating that though they believed Show Me! was not pornographic, they could no longer afford the legal expenses to defend it, and they did not want to risk criminal prosecutions of their own personnel and/or vendors who sold the book. [9] The Court overruled a decision of the New York Court of Appeals, The People v. Paul Ira Ferber , which held that the First Amendment protected the dissemination of non-obscene sexual depictions. Show Me! was not the direct subject of the Ferber case, but the book was prominently featured by both sides in the litigation, and it played a significant role in the oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court. [10]

In its country of origin, Germany, the book first won several awards, even from church organisations, but due to rising pressure from a newly arising "moral majority" the publishers and McBride decided to take it off the market in 1996. By then over one million copies in seven languages had been sold. It was never officially banned in Germany. Public libraries there keep it on hand and out of print copies are openly sold at collectors' premium prices. [11]

In New Zealand the book was banned by the Indecent Publications Tribunal in 1976. The ban was upheld in 1996. [12]

Critical reception

Show Me! received mixed reviews from the mass media when it was first published. The Los Angeles Times called the photographs "beautiful...graceful, charming, and elegant," yet accurately predicted, in a severe understatement of what actually happened, that the book "may start (an) uproar." [13] The Washington Post , on the other hand, described the photographs as "beautiful, assaultive, grotesque, and seductive," and concluded that Show Me! was only suited for "avant garde" parents. [14] Reviewer Linda Wolfe was more hostile in the New York Times , calling the book a "child-abusive joke". [15] The 13-year-old daughter of Chicago Tribune reviewer Carol Kleiman stated: "I'm too old for it myself. The last part, though, with no pictures, looks interesting to read. The book is good for little kids because they don't know what society terms 'dirty' yet. You know, Mom, it's PARENTS I'm worried about. They're not ready yet." [16]

Recent reviews

A 2005 Amazon review by Dr. Russell A. Rohde claims that the book, "appropriately delves into the issues of breast feeding, adolescence, pubertal changes, menses, sexual anatomies, pregnancy, masturbation, contraception, sexual behavioral disturbances and venereal disease. [...] I am not aware of any book comparable to this illustrated primer that fills the needs of sexual education so well." [17]

D. F. Janssen places it at the one extreme of a late 20th-century visual and textual revolution that enabled parents to illustrate information that up to that time had been transmitted orally. He sees the work as subversive not for its "too frank" portrayal of childhood sexuality, but instead for the primacy that the image takes over the text. In his eyes, the work "comes out of a culture with a long history of pathologising so-addressed 'primal scenes,'" a history that became manifest in particular with regard to the works of Will McBride. [18]

The book is analyzed in an article on "Picturing Sex Education" (Discourse Volume 27, Number 4 / December 2006).

In 2016, Pennsylvania State University PhD. Brett L. Lunceford, [19] an independent researcher in the field of Rhetoric, Sexuality and Gender, wrote an article «Mommy and Daddy Were Married, and Other Creation Myths in Children’s Books About Sex», published in «The Rhetorical Power of Children's Literature», with a review of few children's books about sex. Among them, Peter Mayle's «Where Did I Come From?»  [ uk ] compared versus Will McBride's «Show Me!», highlighting issues and good sides of each book in textual part and in visual illustration. Lunceford resumed his article stating that “the children's books that children read help to shape the world in which they eventually live”. [20]

See also

Bibliographic details

  1. 1974: Zeig mal. Ein Bilderbuch für Kinder und Eltern Foreword by Helmut Kentler. Wuppertal: Jugenddienst.
  2. 1975: Show Me!: A Picture Book of Sex for Children and Parents St. Martin's Press. ISBN   0-312-72275-3
  3. 1975: Laat 's zien!: een fotoboek over sex voor kinderen en ouders Amsterdam: Kosmos. ISBN   90-215-0528-2
  4. 1978: Fais voir ! Un livre illustré sur la sexualité Montreal: Quinze. ISBN   0-88565-171-5
  5. 1979: Fammi Vedere! un libro fotografico di educazione sessuale non conformista per bambini e grandi Perugia: Savelli
  6. 1979: ¡A ver!: un libro de imágenes para niños y padres Salamanca: Lóguez Ediciones. ISBN   84-85334-06-X
  7. 1981: Få se: seksualopplysning i tekst og bilder for barn og foreldre Oslo: Aschehoug i samarbeid med Hverdag. ISBN   82-03-10463-0
  8. 1990: Zeig mal. Ein Bilderbuch für Kinder und Eltern (2nd. ed.) 195 p. Wuppertal: Hammer. ISBN   3-87294-301-4
  9. 1990: Ukaž mi to! : Mezinárodní osvětová obrázková kniha pro děti a rodiče s informací o AIDS, translated by Jiří Kostelecký, Czech introduction by Jiří Raboch, 1st. ed., 199 p., Praha : Kredit ; Wuppertal : Peter Hammer, 1990, ISBN   80-85279-05-3, 20.000 copies
  10. 1995: Zeig Mal Mehr (5 ed.). 176 p. Beltz. ISBN   3-407-85106-5

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Erotica</span> Category of sexually stimulating media

Erotica is literature or art that deals substantively with subject matter that is erotic, sexually stimulating or sexually arousing. Some critics regard pornography as a type of erotica, but many consider it to be different. Erotic art may use any artistic form to depict erotic content, including painting, sculpture, drama, film or music. Erotic literature and erotic photography have become genres in their own right. Erotica also exists in a number of subgenres including gay, lesbian, women's, bondage, monster and tentacle erotica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual revolution</span> 20th-century Western social movement

The sexual revolution, also known as the sexual liberation, was a social movement that challenged traditional codes of behavior related to sexuality and interpersonal relationships throughout the developed Western world from the 1960s to the 1970s. Sexual liberation included increased acceptance of sex outside of traditional heterosexual, monogamous relationships. The normalization of contraception and the pill, public nudity, pornography, premarital sex, homosexuality, masturbation, alternative forms of sexuality, and the legalization of abortion all followed.

Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court modifying its definition of obscenity from that of "utterly without socially redeeming value" to that which lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". It is now referred to as the three-prong standard or the Miller test.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marty Klein</span> American sex therapist

Marty Ralph Klein is an American sex therapist, author, educator and public policy analyst. Klein has spent his career supporting the healthy sexual expression of men, women and couples in a wide range of ways. He is critical of censorship, the concepts of sex addiction and porn addiction, as well as the anti-pornography movement. He believes that public policy relating to sexuality should be driven by scientific data rather than emotion, "tradition" or popular but untrue myths. He has been a participant in various state, federal and international court cases dealing with the First Amendment, obscenity, censorship and "harmful to minors" laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography laws by region</span> Legality of pornography

Pornography laws by region vary throughout the world. The production and distribution of pornographic films are both activities that are lawful in many, but by no means in all countries so long as the pornography features performers aged above a certain age, usually 18 years. Further restrictions are often placed on such material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PROTECT Act of 2003</span> United States law regarding child abuse and violent crimes against children

The PROTECT Act of 2003 is a United States law with the stated intent of preventing child abuse as well as investigating and prosecuting violent crimes against children. "PROTECT" is a backronym which stands for "Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography in Europe</span>

Pornography has been dominated by a few pan-European producers and distributors, the most notable of which is the Private Media Group that successfully claimed the position previously held by Color Climax Corporation in the early 1990s. Most European countries also have local pornography producers, from Portugal to Serbia, who face varying levels of competition with international producers. The legal status of pornography varies widely in Europe; its production and distribution are illegal in countries such as Ukraine, Belarus and Bulgaria, while Hungary has liberal pornography laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography</span> Portrayal of sexual subject matter

Pornography has been defined as sexual subject material "such as a picture, video, or text" that is intended for sexual arousal. Indicated for the consumption by adults, pornography depictions have evolved from cave paintings, some forty millennia ago, to virtual reality presentations. A general distinction of adult content is made classifying it as pornography or erotica.

New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982), was a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court, unanimously ruling that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution did not forbid states from banning the sale of material depicting children engaged in sexual activity, even if the material was not obscene.

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), previously known as Morality in Media and Operation Yorkville, is an American conservative anti-pornography organization. The group has also campaigned against sex trafficking, same-sex marriage, sex shops and sex toys, decriminalization of sex work, comprehensive sex education, and various works of literature or visual arts the organization has deemed obscene, profane or indecent. Its current president is Patrick A. Trueman. The organization describes its goal as "exposing the links between all forms of sexual exploitation".

Child erotica is non-pornographic material relating to children that is used by any individuals for sexual purposes. It is a broader term than child pornography, incorporating material that may cause sexual arousal such as nonsexual images, books or magazines on children or pedophilia, toys, diaries, or clothes. Law enforcement investigators have found that child erotica is often collected by pedophiles and child sexual abuse offenders. It may be collected as a form of compulsive behavior and as a substitute for illegal underage pornography and is often a form of evidence for criminal behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography in India</span>

Pornography in India is restricted and illegal in all form including print media, electronic media, and digital media (OTT). Hosting, displaying, uploading, modifying, publishing, transmitting, storing, updating or sharing pornography is illegal in India.

Legal frameworks around fictional pornography depicting minors vary depending on country and nature of the material involved. Laws against production, distribution and consumption of child pornography generally separate images into three categories: real, pseudo, and virtual. Pseudo-photographic child pornography is produced by digitally manipulating non-sexual images of real minors to make pornographic material. Virtual child pornography depicts purely fictional characters. "Fictional pornography depicting minors", as covered in this article, includes these latter two categories, whose legalities vary by jurisdiction, and often differ with each other and with the legality of real child pornography.

An obscenity is any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality and social politics of the time. It is derived from the Latin obscēnus, obscaenus, "boding ill; disgusting; indecent", of uncertain etymology. Such loaded language can be used to indicate strong moral repugnance and outrage, vile, vigilance in conservation, or revenge. In expressions such as "obscene profits" and "the obscenity of war," ; misdirection. As a legal term, it usually refers to graphic depictions of people engaged in sexual and excretory activity, and related utterances of profanity, or the exploited child, human being or situation on display.

In the United States, child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to life imprisonment and fines of up to $250,000. U.S. laws regarding child pornography are virtually always enforced and amongst the harshest in the world. The Supreme Court of the United States has found child pornography to be outside the protections of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Federal sentencing guidelines on child pornography differentiate between production, distribution, and purchasing/receiving, and also include variations in severity based on the age of the child involved in the materials, with significant increases in penalties when the offense involves a prepubescent child or a child under the age of 18. U.S. law distinguishes between pornographic images of an actual minor, realistic images that are not of an actual minor, and non-realistic images such as drawings. The latter two categories are legally protected unless found to be obscene, whereas the first does not require a finding of obscenity.

Simulated child pornography is child pornography depicting what appear to be minors but which is produced without their direct involvement.

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down two overbroad provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech". The case was brought against the U.S. government by the Free Speech Coalition, a "California trade association for the adult-entertainment industry", along with Bold Type, Inc., a "publisher of a book advocating the nudist lifestyle"; Jim Gingerich, who paints nudes; and Ron Raffaelli, a photographer who specialized in erotic images. By striking down these two provisions, the Court rejected an invitation to increase the amount of speech that would be categorically outside the protection of the First Amendment.

United States obscenity law deals with the regulation or suppression of what is considered obscenity and therefore not protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In the United States, discussion of obscenity typically relates to defining what pornography is obscene, as well as to issues of freedom of speech and of the press, otherwise protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Issues of obscenity arise at federal and state levels. State laws operate only within the jurisdiction of each state, and there are differences among such laws. Federal statutes ban obscenity and child pornography produced with real children. Federal law also bans broadcasting of "indecent" material during specified hours.

United States v. Handley, 564 F. Supp. 2d 996 (2008), was a court case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa involving obscenity charges stemming from the importation of manga featuring pornographic depictions of fictional minors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helmut Kentler</span> German psychologist (1928–2008)

Helmut Kentler was a German psychologist, sexologist and professor of social education at the University of Hannover. From the late 1960s until the early 1990s, with the authorization and financial support of the Berlin Senate, Kentler placed neglected youth as foster children in the homes of single pedophile fathers with the ostensible purpose of resocializing them, while explicitly encouraging sexual contact between them. This project was later dubbed the "Kentler Experiment" or the "Kentler Project."

References

  1. "Droney wants children's book found obscene". Boston Globe. December 6, 1975. p. 3. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  2. "Eldredge hits book sales". Portsmouth Herald (Portsmouth, NH). December 18, 1975. p. 1. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  3. French, William (August 5, 1975). "JA New Chapter in Long, Sad Story of Book-Banning". Times-Colonist (Victoria, British Columbia). p. 5. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  4. "Sex ed book has 'social value'". The Courier News (Bridgewater, NJ). AP. January 9, 1976. p. 4. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  5. Brewster, Timothy (February 26, 1976). "Judge rules 'Show Me' isn't obscene book". Portsmouth Herald (Portsmouth, NH). p. 1. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  6. "Show Me sex manual cleared by court". The Ottawa Journal. CP. July 17, 1976. p. 4. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  7. "Sex Education Book: Photos of Nude Children OK'd". Spokane Chronicle. Associated Press. November 29, 1977. p. 9. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  8. New York v. Ferber, Findlaw.com
  9. "Publisher shelves kids' 'Show Me!' book after porno ruling". Austin American-Statesman. September 23, 1982. p. C1. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  10. Oral argument at Oyez.org. Accessed 23 May 2008
  11. On the book's history, see Paul Okami, “‘Child Perpetrators of Sexual Abuse’: The Emergence of a Problematic Deviant Category,” Journal of Sex Research, 19 (1992), 117.
  12. "New Zealand Censorship Database". Office of Film & Literature Classification. 1976 Publication No. IPT 76-860. 1996 Publication No. 9400964. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
  13. Jones, Robert A. (March 9, 1975). "Child's Sex Book May Start Uproar". The Los Angeles Times. pp. 6–7. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  14. "Kiss the Stork Goodbye," Washington Post May 5, 1975
  15. "The birds and the bees were never like this", New York Times July 13, 1975
  16. Kleiman, Carole (July 5, 1975). "New sex ed: All kids ever wanted to know...and how!". Chicago Tribune. p. 11. Retrieved December 10, 2021 via Newspapers.com.
  17. Russell A. Rohde MD (February 17, 2005). "Show Me!"...unique, explicit & sadly controversial... ASIN   0312722753. 5.0 out of 5 stars
  18. D. F. Janssen, Growing Up Sexually. Volume II: The Sexual Curriculum: The Manufacture and Performance of Pre-Adult Sexualities (October 2002)
  19. "Brett Lunceford - Academia.edu". independent.academia.edu. Retrieved 2023-09-30.
  20. Lunceford, Brett L. (2016). Saunders, John H. (ed.). "Mommy and Daddy Were Married, and Other Creation Myths in Children's Books About Sex". The Rhetorical Power of Children's Literature. Lanham—Boulder—New York—London: Lexington Books: 55–76. ISBN   9781498543309.