Social class differences in food consumption

Last updated
An African American family eating a meal in a middle or upper middle class setting. African American communities often have other elements of distinctive food culture that is not just determined by class. Family eating lunch.jpg
An African American family eating a meal in a middle or upper middle class setting. African American communities often have other elements of distinctive food culture that is not just determined by class.

Social class differences in food consumption refers to how the quantity and quality of food varies according to a person's social status or position in the social hierarchy [ citation needed ]. Various disciplines, including social, psychological, nutritional, and public health sciences, have examined this topic. Social class can be examined according to defining factors — education, income, or occupational status — or subjective components, like perceived rank in society.

Contents

Eating behavior is a highly affiliative act, [1] thus the food one eats is closely tied with one's social class throughout history. [2] In contemporary Western society, social class differences in food consumption follow a general pattern. Upper class groups consume foods that signify exclusivity and access to rare goods; [2] [3] while lower class groups, on the other hand, consume foods that are readily available.

Upper class diets

Luxury food typical for high end restaurant (Steak with asparagus). Restaurant food often plays a role in determining the characteristics of upper class cuisine. Steak and asparagus.jpg
Luxury food typical for high end restaurant (Steak with asparagus). Restaurant food often plays a role in determining the characteristics of upper class cuisine.

Exclusivity

Like any luxury product, some foods denote a sense of class and distinction. [4] According to French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, the food consumed by the upper classes reflect "tastes of refinement", [5] and its perceived value in society. [5] Historically, these were highly exclusive food items, [4] which were marked by high demand and low supply. [2] [3] [6] [7]

One clear illustration of this phenomenon is the introduction of spices in European diet. [2] [3] [6] [7] In medieval Western Europe, the amount of meat consumed distinguished the upper from the lower classes, as only upper class groups could afford to eat meat in large quantities. [6] The diet of lower class groups, who had little access to meat, mostly consisted of grains (e.g., barley and rye) and vegetables (e.g. cabbage and carrots). [8]   Spices, such as black pepper, [9] were introduced as meat seasoning—albeit in small quantities— following initial contact with Asia. The high cost of transporting these spices limited access to the rich; thus, both the amount and type of meat consumed became a signal of status.

Omnivorism

Omnivorism, a term typically reserved for those who consume a non-restricted variety of food products, [10] may also refer to the consumption of rare or foreign foods. [3] [2] Consuming unfamiliar foods, especially foods from different cultures, signifies a sense of worldliness that can only be obtained through social and economic capital. [3] [2] There is some documented evidence for this claim: Upper class groups, relative to lower class groups, were more likely to endorse eating foods that were outside of their native culture [11] [12] [13] and show a preoccupation for the perceived authenticity of foreign cuisine, [14] preferring dine-in establishments over fast food chains. [15]

Nutritional quality

Finally, the nutritional quality of Western upper class diets is typically better than those of lower class diets. Several studies have found that with increased education and income, diet quality improved. Even subjective measures of social status, such as the MacArthur Subjective Social Status Scale, [16] exert a similar effect on eating behavior among minority groups. Those who see themselves as having a higher position in society were more likely to report better health. [17]

Better access to healthy foods

Greater income plays an important role in accessing healthy foods. This is especially true in the United States compared to other high-income countries. [18] According to a 2023 survey, 61.5% of respondents consider healthy food to be a luxury. [19] Most health food stores and supermarkets, which carry fresh produce, are more readily available in high-income areas compared to low-income areas. [20] Turrell and colleagues [21] noted that income, as opposed to education and occupational status, was the only significant indicator of low-income groups purchasing foods that met recommended dietary guidelines. Said differently, it was money—not more years of education nor the prestige of one's job— that allowed low-income groups to achieve a healthy diet.

A significant body of evidence shows how healthy foods cost more than unhealthy foods. [22] [23] Nevertheless, scholars have not been able to identify specific micronutrients (i.e., vitamins, minerals) and macronutrients (i.e., carbohydrates, fat) that consistently contribute to the inflated price of a healthy diet. [24] [25] [26] One analysis of food expenditure in the United States demonstrated that the relationship between the price of a food item and its nutritional quality varied according to how the price of food was measured. The price of vegetables, for example, cost nearly twice as much when measured as “price per 100 calories” than when it was measured as “price per edible gram” or “price average portion” (roughly $3.75/100 calories vs. $1.60 and $1.40, respectively). [27] Others have noted that the price of certain fruits and vegetables are dropping at the same rate as popular snack foods, such as chips and cookies. [28]

Higher education and nutritional analysis

Higher education is related to a better diet and is thought to improve eating behaviors by increasing susceptibility to health messages. [29] Nutritional literacy and numeracy refers to the ability to understand and use nutrition labels to guide eating behaviors. Higher social class groups report using nutrition labels at a greater rate than low social class groups, [30] [31] but in general, rates of nutrition label use is low. It estimated that only a third of Americans use nutrition labels. [31] Importantly, a vast majority of published studies evaluating the effects of nutrition label use and food consumption did not include other racial/ethnic minorities in their samples, nor did the studies meet the American Dietetic Association standard of reporting. [32] Thus, the extent to which nutrition label use affects the American population, at large, remains in question.

Middle class diets

The defining characteristics of middle class diets are less obvious than those of high and low class groups. For one, most researchers struggle to define "middle class". Is it solely a socioeconomic position (i.e., median income, distance from the federal poverty level) or is it a psychological state of mind (i.e., self-perception and culture)? [33] Likewise, middle class diets are subject to the same ambiguity.

The middle class are the biggest consumers of fast food in the United States. [34] Yet, nutritional quality of middle class diets closely mirrors those of the upper classes. More importantly, the nutritional quality of the middle and upper classes is expected to significantly diverge from the lower classes over time. [35]

One way to look at middle class diets is that it reflects an aspirational pursuit of obtaining a higher social standing. Sociological theorist, Gabriel Tarde, suggested that "inferior" classes seek to mimic the culture of the "superior" classes. [36] This is becoming more apparent as conspicuous consumption is on the decline. [37] According to sociologist, Thorstein Veblen, conspicuous consumption is the audacious display of wealth to mark one's social standing. [38] Rapid globalization and online markets have made once-exclusive consumer goods accessible to the middle class American; and, as a result, upper classes have turned away from ostentatious indicators of wealth. [37] Instead, the upper classes have invested in inconspicuous forms of consumption, such as advanced education. [39]

Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, author of The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class, suggests that the consumption of organic foods is one way that both the upper and the middle classes engage in inconspicuous consumption. [40] Buying and eating organic foods not only requires a certain degree of expendable money, [41] but it also suggests that the middle class consumer possesses some nutritional knowledge and the ability to access the same grocery markets as the rich. [40] Others note that the middle class also engages in the same upper class practices of eating out and eating foreign foods to display their cultural capital. [42]

Lower class diets

A takeaway cheeseburger. Fast food and inexpensive processed convenience foods are common in working class households where economic insecurity and restraints in access to nutritious foods, skills and time to cook often lead to less healthy food options. Whataburger hamburger and fries.jpg
A takeaway cheeseburger. Fast food and inexpensive processed convenience foods are common in working class households where economic insecurity and restraints in access to nutritious foods, skills and time to cook often lead to less healthy food options.

In the United States, one way of defining low social class is reporting an income level lower than the federal poverty threshold. According to the U.S. Federal Poverty Guidelines, a family of four (i.e., two adults and two children under 18) that earns less than $25,750 is considered living below the federal poverty line as of 2019. [43] About 38.1 million Americans live in poverty. [44] However, some argue that this might be an underestimation as the current guidelines do not account for other expenses, such as childcare, transportation, tax, or medical bills. [45]

Nevertheless, having less income requires families to choose generally unhealthy foods to meet basic needs. [46] Low income families do not regularly meet the required daily servings of nutrient-rich foods, such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, [47] and this issue spans far beyond the United States. Globally, low income is related to poor micronutrient intake. [48]

In the US, the United States Department of Agriculture developed a set of guidelines designed to help all Americans meet their nutritional needs. In particular, the Thrifty Food Plan was designed to help low-income groups identify time-efficient, [49] budget-friendly foods [28] that met nutritional standards. Additionally, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formally the Food Stamp Act of 1977, [50] is a government-funded program that provides low-income Americans with subsidies to purchase foods. [51]

Common diet

Fatty meats, potatoes, pasta, canned corn, rice and cereal are among the most common foods purchased by many low income families. [46] About 50% of low-income U.S. adults report eating unhealthy or expired foods, [52] and among food bank patrons, the most requested items are dairy products, fruits and vegetables, and lean meat. [53]

Economic perspectives

Food insecurity

Food insecurity refers to economic or social conditions that contribute to inconsistent or inadequate access to food. [54] Roughly 43 million American households are impacted by food insecurity [55] and this insecurity disproportionately affects low-income, racial/ethnic minority, and single parent households. [55]

Food insecurity plays a large role in the formation of diets and diet quality. [56] In urban areas, vast income inequality makes purchasing healthy foods more difficult for low-income groups, especially among racial minorities. [57] In rural areas, low-income groups have less access to healthy foods than high income groups. [57] These so-called "food deserts" lack adequate grocery stores or markets that provide fresh and nutritious foods. [58] Some note that food deserts also constitute regions where health foods are available but are expensive or inconsistently stocked. [59] [60] [18] On the other hand, another issue facing many low-income communities is the growing prevalence of fast food restaurants, which pose major health risks. [61] [62]

Availability

Apart from taste, which is valued among all socioeconomic groups' food preferences, low-income groups prioritized the cost, convenience, and familiarity of their meals. [63] On average, food insecurity and low income is associated with overeating high-calorie snack foods and carbohydrates [64] and under-eating fruits and vegetables. [56] [65] One explanation for the discrepancy is a lack of time. Preparing and cooking raw fruits and vegetables requires more time than purchasing ready-made meals and snacks. This distinction is particularly important among those who have less expendable time, like single working mothers, [66] [67] who make up 10% of food insecure households. [55] A study by the United States Department of Agriculture concluded that low income, full-time working women spend around 40 minutes a day preparing and cooking meals, compared to non-working women who spend around 70 minutes per day. [68]

Considering that fast food chains are more prevalent among low-income areas than among middle- and high-income areas, [62] consuming ready-made food allows time-strained individuals to meet both work and household demands. In fact, low-income households do spend more money on fast food as a result of their time constraints: Households that make less than $50,000 per year spend nearly 50% of their food expenditure on “foods away from home”, [69] or ready-to-eat foods that are available through public spaces (e.g., such as vending machines, restaurants, or schools). Generally, "foods away from home" are of lower nutritional quality than foods prepared at home. [70]

However, low-income groups are not the only consumers of unhealthy foods. A report from the United States Department of Agriculture demonstrated that foods consumed at fast food restaurants constituted about 15% of one's daily caloric intake for both high- and low-income groups. [71] Somewhat surprisingly, high-income groups actually consume more calories overall from “foods away from home” compared to low-income groups. This is accounted by differences in eating at dine-in restaurants, which are typically more expensive than fast food restaurants. [71]

Psychological perspectives

Behavior

A main critique of studies examining food insecurity is the emphasis on economic restraints. Others have argued for a reform to address the negative psychological impact of poverty and food insecurity. [72] The most common assessment of food insecurity in the United States, the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module, is unable to account for the behavioral strategies that one may undertake to avoid being food insecure, such as limiting portion sizes or borrowing money. [73] To address this gap, some have developed behavior-based measures of food insecurity. [74]

Stress

There is emerging evidence that the psychological experiences of poverty and low status can directly influence the foods that one eats. Stress-induced eating, [75] closely related to emotional eating, is quite common in the United States. One survey by the American Psychological Association found that nearly 40% of US adults reported overeating or eating unhealthily in response to stress. [76]

Many scholars believe that stress is a key mechanism in the relationship between low social class and poor eating behaviors. [77] [78] [79] In non-human models, animals that undergo subordination stress (e.g., attacks from a dominant animal in shared housing conditions) derive most of their caloric intake from fatty and sugary foods. [80] It is possible that stress-induced eating serves an evolutionary adaptive function: Such that, stress motivates low status animals to seek out resources, such as food, that are in possession of and limited by high status animals. Thus, under conditions of low status, high-calorie foods have the prospect of expanding an uncertain lifespan. [81]

Among humans, the evidence is a little less clear. Low status groups do have a poorer diet, and they do experience more stress compared to high status groups. On average, low status groups experience more daily life hassles, [82] negative life events, [83] and more workplace and family stressors. [84] Further, the average stress levels for low status groups tend to increase at a greater rate than their high status counterparts. [85] However, there is hardly any research to demonstrate how stress serves as a mechanism of poor eating behaviors among low-income groups, and leaves the phenomenon of stress-induced eating among low-income groups in question.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food security</span> Measure of the availability and accessibility of food

Food security is the availability of food in a country and the ability of individuals within that country (region) to access, afford, and source adequate foodstuff. The availability of food irrespective of class, gender or region is another element of food security. Similarly, household food security is considered to exist when all the members of a family, at all times, have access to enough food for an active, healthy life. Individuals who are food secure do not live in hunger or fear of starvation. Food insecurity, on the other hand, is defined as a situation of " limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways." Food security incorporates a measure of resilience to future disruption or unavailability of critical food supply due to various risk factors including droughts, shipping disruptions, fuel shortages, economic instability, and wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mediterranean diet</span> Diet inspired by the Mediterranean region

The Mediterranean diet is a diet inspired by the eating habits and traditional food typical of southern Spain, southern Italy, and Crete, and formulated in the early 1960s. It is distinct from Mediterranean cuisine, which covers the actual cuisines of the Mediterranean countries, and from the Atlantic diet of Northwestern Spain and Portugal. While inspired by a specific time and place, the "Mediterranean diet" was later refined based on the results of multiple scientific studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plant-based diet</span> Diet consisting mostly or entirely of plant-based foods

A plant-based diet is a diet consisting mostly or entirely of plant-based foods. Plant-based diets encompass a wide range of dietary patterns that contain low amounts of animal products and high amounts of fiber-rich plant products such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds. They do not need to be vegan or vegetarian but are defined in terms of low frequency of animal food consumption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthy diet</span> Type of diet

A healthy diet is a diet that maintains or improves overall health. A healthy diet provides the body with essential nutrition: fluid, macronutrients such as protein, micronutrients such as vitamins, and adequate fibre and food energy.

The social determinants of health are the economic and social conditions that influence individual and group differences in health status. They are the health promoting factors found in one's living and working conditions, rather than individual risk factors that influence the risk or vulnerability for a disease or injury. The distribution of social determinants is often shaped by public policies that reflect prevailing political ideologies of the area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food desert</span> Area that has limited access to affordable and nutritious food

A food desert is an area that has limited access to affordable and nutritious food. In contrast, an area with greater access to supermarkets and vegetable shops with fresh foods may be called a food oasis. The designation considers the type and the quality of food available to the population, in addition to the accessibility of the food through the size and the proximity of the food stores.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social determinants of obesity</span> Overview of the social determinants of obesity

While genetic influences are important to understanding obesity, they cannot explain the current dramatic increase seen within specific countries or globally. It is accepted that calorie consumption in excess of calorie expenditure leads to obesity; however, what has caused shifts in these two factors on a global scale is much debated.

Nutrition education is a set of learning experiences designed to assist in healthy eating choices and other nutrition-related behavior. It includes any combination of educational strategies, accompanied by environmental supports, designed to facilitate voluntary adoption of food choices and other food and nutrition-related behaviors conducive to health and well-being. Nutrition education is delivered through multiple venues and involves activities at the individual, community, and policy levels. Nutrition Education also critically looks at issues such as food security, food literacy, and food sustainability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vegan nutrition</span> Nutritional and human health aspects of vegan diets

Vegan nutrition refers to the nutritional and human health aspects of vegan diets. A well-planned, balanced vegan diet is suitable to meet all recommendations for nutrients in every stage of human life. Vegan diets tend to be higher in dietary fiber, magnesium, folic acid, vitamin C, vitamin E, and phytochemicals; and lower in calories, saturated fat, iron, cholesterol, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, calcium, zinc, and vitamin B12.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of fast food</span> Overview about the criticism of fast food

Criticism of fast food includes claims of negative health effects, animal cruelty, cases of worker exploitation, children-targeted marketing and claims of cultural degradation via shifts in people's eating patterns away from traditional foods. Fast food chains have come under fire from consumer groups, such as the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a longtime fast food critic over issues such as caloric content, trans fats and portion sizes. Social scientists have highlighted how the prominence of fast food narratives in popular urban legends suggests that modern consumers have an ambivalent relationship with fast food, particularly in relation to children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunger in the United States</span> Food insecurity

Hunger in the United States of America affects millions of Americans, including some who are middle class, or who are in households where all adults are in work. The United States produces far more food than it needs for domestic consumption—hunger within the U.S. is caused by some Americans having insufficient money to buy food for themselves or their families. Additional causes of hunger and food insecurity include neighborhood deprivation and agricultural policy. Hunger is addressed by a mix of public and private food aid provision. Public interventions include changes to agricultural policy, the construction of supermarkets in underserved neighborhoods, investment in transportation infrastructure, and the development of community gardens. Private aid is provided by food pantries, soup kitchens, food banks, and food rescue organizations.

Nutrition psychology (NP) is the psychological study of the relationship between dietary intake and different aspects of psychological health. It is an applied field that uses an interdisciplinary approach to examine the influence of diet on mental health. Nutrition psychology seeks to understand the relationship between nutritional behavior and mental health/well-being NP is a sub-field of psychology and more specifically of health psychology. It may be applied to numerous different fields including: psychology, dietetics, nutrition, and marketing. NP is a fairly new field with a brief history that has already started to contribute information and knowledge to psychology. There are two main areas of controversy within nutrition psychology. The first area of controversy is that the topic can be viewed in two different ways. It can be viewed as nutrition affecting psychological functions, or psychological choices and behavior influencing nutrition and health. The second controversy is the defining of what is "healthy" or "normal" as related to nutrition.

Emotional eating, also known as stress eating and emotional overeating, is defined as the "propensity to eat in response to positive and negative emotions". While the term commonly refers to eating as a means of coping with negative emotions, it sometimes include eating for positive emotions, such as overeating when celebrating an event or to enhance an already good mood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Obesity and the environment</span> Overview of environmental factors affecting the incidence of obesity

Obesity and the environment aims to look at the different environmental factors that researchers worldwide have determined cause and perpetuate obesity. Obesity is a condition in which a person's weight is higher than what is considered healthy for their height, and is the leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Obesity can result from several factors such as poor nutritional choices, overeating, genetics, culture, and metabolism. Many diseases and health complications are associated with obesity. Worldwide, the rates of obesity have nearly tripled since 1975, leading health professionals to label the condition as a modern epidemic in most parts of the world. Current worldwide population estimates of obese adults are near 13%; overweight adults total approximately 39%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food security in the Central Valley, California</span> Widespread issue where most of the nations agriculture is produced

Food security in the Central Valley, California, United states is a widespread issue. The Central Valley is where most of the state's and the nation's agriculture is produced. Despite this, many people living and working in the valley's agriculture industry are food insecure in some way, with contributing factors including lack of food sources, lack of healthy food choices, or income barriers. About a third of many Central Valley counties' populations were documented as food insecure in 2009. Due to the lack of healthy food choices, high rates of obesity have also been found in the Central Valley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food deserts by country</span>

This is a list of food desert issues and solutions by country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soul food health trends</span>

Soul food is a kind of African American cuisine that encompasses a variety of fried, roasted, and boiled food dishes consisting of chicken and pork meats, sweet potatoes, corn, leafy greens and other vegetables. Soul food has long been embedded in African American culture, but pushes towards healthy eating habits, for both physical and mental health, have adapted soul food cuisine to fit within health trends. This article will describe modifications of traditional soul food within health trends, including soul food with low carb, soul food with low sugar, soul food with low fat, soul food for vegan and soul food in gluten-free.

Food psychology is the psychological study of how people choose the food they eat, along with food and eating behaviors. Food psychology is an applied psychology, using existing psychological methods and findings to understand food choice and eating behaviors. Factors studied by food psychology include food cravings, sensory experiences of food, perceptions of food security and food safety, price, available product information such as nutrition labeling and the purchasing environment. Food psychology also encompasses broader sociocultural factors such as cultural perspectives on food, public awareness of "what constitutes a sustainable diet", and food marketing including "food fraud" where ingredients are intentionally motivated for economic gain as opposed to nutritional value. These factors are considered to interact with each other along with an individual's history of food choices to form new food choices and eating behaviors.

Nutritional epigenetics is a science that studies the effects of nutrition on gene expression and chromatin accessibility. It is a subcategory of nutritional genomics that focuses on the effects of bioactive food components on epigenetic events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food deserts in the United States</span>

Food deserts are generally defined as regions that lack access to supermarkets and affordable, healthy foods, particularly in low-income communities. According to the USDA's most recent report on food access, as of 2017, approximately 39.5 million people - 12.9% of the US population - lived in low-income and low food access.

References

  1. Higgs, Suzanne (2015-03-01). "Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours" (PDF). Appetite. Social Influences on Eating. 86: 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021. ISSN   0195-6663. PMID   25451578. S2CID   13510190.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fox, R. (2014). Food and eating: An anthropological perspective. Social Issues Research Centre, 1–22.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Tierney, R. K., & Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (2012). Anthropology of Food. In J. M. Pilcher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Food History. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. 1 2 Berg, M. (2012). Luxury, the luxury trades, and the roots of industrial growth: A global perspective. (F. Trentman, Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Consumption. Oxford University Press.
  5. 1 2 Bourdieu, Pierre, 1930-2002. (1986). Distinction : a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN   0-415-04546-0. OCLC   16921682.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  6. 1 2 3 Mennell, Stephen. (1996). All manners of food : eating and taste in England and France from the Middle Ages to the present (2nd ed., Illini books ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. ISBN   0-631-13244-9. OCLC   32014474.
  7. 1 2 Burnett, S. C., & Krishnendu, R. (2012). Sociology of Food. In J. Pilcher (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Food History. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. "Medieval Food and Drink | Facts, Diet, Preparation & Preservation". School History. Retrieved 2019-11-20.
  9. The appetite and the eye : visual aspects of food and its presentation within their historic context; [papers from the second Leeds Symposium on Food History and Traditions; April 1987; with additional papers]. Wilson, Constance Anne., Leeds Symposium on Food History and Traditions. <2, 1987>. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Pr. 1991. ISBN   0-7486-0101-5. OCLC   311328173.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  10. Dictionary of science and technology. Collocott, T. C.,, Dobson, A. B. (Alan Binaloss) (Revised ed.). Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers. 1974. ISBN   0-550-13202-3. OCLC   1077670.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  11. Wills, Wendy; Backett-Milburn, Kathryn; Roberts, Mei-Li; Lawton, Julia (November 2011). "The Framing of Social Class Distinctions through Family Food and Eating Practices". The Sociological Review. 59 (4): 725–740. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2011.02035.x. hdl: 2299/10465 . ISSN   0038-0261. S2CID   142980217.
  12. Bell, David; Hollows, Joanne (February 2007). "Mobile Homes". Space and Culture. 10 (1): 22–39. Bibcode:2007SpCul..10...22B. doi:10.1177/1206331206296380. ISSN   1206-3312. S2CID   220753020.
  13. Skeggs, Beverley (October 2004). "Exchange, Value and Affect: Bourdieu and 'The Self'". The Sociological Review. 52 (2_suppl): 75–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2005.00525.x. ISSN   0038-0261. S2CID   142516180.
  14. Ferdman, Roberto A. "How Americans pretend to love 'ethnic food'". Washington Post. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  15. "Linguistic Markers of Status in Food Culture: Bourdieu's Distinction in a Menu Corpus « CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics". culturalanalytics.org. Archived from the original on 2019-08-14. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  16. Adler, Nancy E.; Epel, Elissa S.; Castellazzo, Grace; Ickovics, Jeannette R. (2000). "Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women". Health Psychology. 19 (6): 586–592. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586. PMID   11129362. S2CID   21584664.
  17. Reitzel, Lorraine R.; Nguyen, Nga; Strong, Larkin L.; Wetter, David W.; McNeill, Lorna H. (2013). "Subjective Social Status and Health Behaviors Among African Americans". American Journal of Health Behavior. 37 (1): 104–111. doi:10.5993/AJHB.37.1.12. PMC   3433853 . PMID   22943107.
  18. 1 2 Posner, SF (December 2011). "Advancing and Improving Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy". Preventing Chronic Disease. 9: E32. doi:10.5888/pcd9.110291. ISSN   1545-1151. PMC   3277408 . S2CID   26413213.
  19. Abdou, Anouare (April 2023). "Almost 30% of People Say Spending on Healthy Food is Important, But Nearly 80% Say It's Too Expensive". Credello.
  20. Krukowski, Rebecca A.; West, Delia Smith; Harvey-Berino, Jean; Elaine Prewitt, T. (June 2010). "Neighborhood Impact on Healthy Food Availability and Pricing in Food Stores". Journal of Community Health. 35 (3): 315–320. doi:10.1007/s10900-010-9224-y. ISSN   0094-5145. PMC   3071013 . PMID   20127506. S2CID   25985245.
  21. Turrell, Gavin; Hewitt, Belinda; Patterson, Carla; Oldenburg, Brian (April 2003). "Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important?". Public Health Nutrition. 6 (2): 191–200. doi: 10.1079/phn2002416 . ISSN   1368-9800. PMID   12675962.
  22. Drewnowski, Adam; Eichelsdoerfer, Petra (November 2010). "Can Low-Income Americans Afford a Healthy Diet?". Nutrition Today. 44 (6): 246–249. doi:10.1097/NT.0b013e3181c29f79. ISSN   0029-666X. PMC   2847733 . PMID   20368762.
  23. "'Know Me Come Eat With Me': What Food Says about Leopold Bloom", ‘Tickling the Palate’, Peter Lang, 2014, doi:10.3726/978-3-0353-0598-2/14, ISBN   978-3-0343-1769-6
  24. Darmon, Nicole; Drewnowski, Adam (May 2008). "Does social class predict diet quality?". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 87 (5): 1107–1117. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1107 . ISSN   1938-3207. PMID   18469226.
  25. Ricciuto, Laurie E.; Tarasuk, Valerie S. (January 2007). "An examination of income-related disparities in the nutritional quality of food selections among Canadian households from 1986–2001". Social Science & Medicine. 64 (1): 186–198. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.020. ISSN   0277-9536. PMID   17030372.
  26. Aggarwal, Anju; Monsivais, Pablo; Drewnowski, Adam (2012-05-25). Wiley, Andrea S. (ed.). "Nutrient Intakes Linked to Better Health Outcomes Are Associated with Higher Diet Costs in the US". PLOS ONE. 7 (5): e37533. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...737533A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037533 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3360788 . PMID   22662168. S2CID   7571840.
  27. Carlson, Andrea; Frazão, Elizabeth (July 2014). "Food costs, diet quality and energy balance in the United States". Physiology & Behavior. 134: 20–31. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.001. ISSN   0031-9384. PMID   24631301. S2CID   38167467.
  28. 1 2 Drewnowski, Adam; Eichelsdoerfer, Petra (November 2009). "Can Low-Income Americans Afford a Healthy Diet?". Nutrition Today. 44 (6): 246–249. doi:10.1097/nt.0b013e3181c29f79. ISSN   0029-666X. PMC   2847733 . PMID   20368762.
  29. Galobardes, B. (2006-01-01). "Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1)". Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 60 (1): 7–12. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.023531. ISSN   0143-005X. PMC   2465546 . PMID   16361448.
  30. Ollberding, Nicholas Jay; Wolf, Randi L.; Contento, Isobel (May 2011). "Food Label Use and Its Relation to Dietary Intake among US Adults". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 111 (5): S47–S51. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.03.009. PMID   21515135.
  31. 1 2 Christoph, Mary J.; Larson, Nicole; Laska, Melissa N.; Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne (February 2018). "Nutrition Facts Panels: Who Uses Them, What Do They Use, and How Does Use Relate to Dietary Intake?". Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 118 (2): 217–228. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.014. PMC   5797995 . PMID   29389508.
  32. Anastasiou, Kim; Miller, Michelle; Dickinson, Kacie (July 2019). "The relationship between food label use and dietary intake in adults: A systematic review". Appetite. 138: 280–291. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.025. PMID   31010704. S2CID   128362528.
  33. Krause, Richard V. Reeves, Katherine Guyot, and Eleanor (2018-05-07). "Defining the middle class: Cash, credentials, or culture?". Brookings. Retrieved 2019-11-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. Conversation, Jay L. Zagorsky and Patricia Smith, The (12 July 2017). "No, poor people don't eat the most fast food". CNN. Retrieved 2019-11-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. Wang, Dong D.; Li, Yanping; Chiuve, Stephanie E.; Hu, Frank B.; Willett, Walter C. (November 2015). "Improvements In US Diet Helped Reduce Disease Burden And Lower Premature Deaths, 1999–2012; Overall Diet Remains Poor". Health Affairs. 34 (11): 1916–1922. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0640. ISSN   0278-2715. PMC   4783149 . PMID   26526250.
  36. Tarde, Gabriel de, 1843-1904 (April 2011). The laws of imitation. [Redditch]. ISBN   978-1-4474-0254-1. OCLC   933277700.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  37. 1 2 Kopf, Dan (11 June 2017). "The new, nearly invisible class markers that separate the American elite from everyone else". Quartz. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  38. VEBLEN, THORSTEIN. (2019). THEORY OF THE LEISURE CLASS. [S.l.]: DIGIREADS COM. ISBN   978-1-4209-6279-6. OCLC   1107532432.
  39. Mittleman, Alan L. (2018-05-24). Persons in a World of Things. Vol. 1. Princeton University Press. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691176277.003.0002.
  40. 1 2 "A very subtle snobbery". www.spiked-online.com. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  41. "Cost of Organic Food - Consumer Reports". www.consumerreports.org. Retrieved 2019-11-23.
  42. Wills, Wendy; Backett-Milburn, Kathryn; Roberts, Mei-Li; Lawton, Julia (November 2011). "The Framing of Social Class Distinctions through Family Food and Eating Practices". The Sociological Review. 59 (4): 725–740. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02035.x. hdl: 2299/10465 . ISSN   0038-0261. S2CID   142980217.
  43. "2019 Poverty Guidelines". ASPE. 2019-01-11. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  44. "Poverty USA". www.povertyusa.org. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  45. Lott, Bernice; Bullock, Heather E. (2001-01-01). "Who Are the Poor?". Journal of Social Issues. 57 (2): 189–206. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00208. ISSN   1540-4560.
  46. 1 2 Drewnowski, Adam; Eichelsdoerfer, Petra (2010). "Can Low-Income Americans Afford a Healthy Diet?". Nutrition Today. 44 (6): 246–249. doi:10.1097/NT.0b013e3181c29f79. ISSN   0029-666X. PMC   2847733 . PMID   20368762.
  47. "USDA ERS - Can Low-Income Americans Afford a Healthy Diet?". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
  48. Vlismas, K.; Stavrinos, V.; Panagiotakos, D. B. (2009). "Socioeconomic status, dietary habits and health-related outcomes in various parts of the world: A review". Central European Journal of Public Health. 17 (2): 55–63. doi: 10.21101/CEJPH.A3475 . PMID   19662821. S2CID   1930856.
  49. "USDA Food Plans: Cost of Food (monthly reports) | USDA-FNS". www.fns.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  50. "A Short History of SNAP | USDA-FNS". www.fns.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  51. "Frequently Asked Questions | USDA-FNS". www.fns.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  52. Quartz, Sonali Kohli (2014-08-19). "The Only Food Poor Americans Can Afford Is Making Them Unhealthy". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  53. "Three Most Requested Food Bank Items | Feeding America". www.feedingamerica.org. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  54. "USDA ERS - Definitions of Food Security". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  55. 1 2 3 "USDA ERS - Key Statistics & Graphics". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  56. 1 2 Leung, Cindy W.; Epel, Elissa S.; Ritchie, Lorrene D.; Crawford, Patricia B.; Laraia, Barbara A. (December 2014). "Food Insecurity Is Inversely Associated with Diet Quality of Lower-Income Adults". Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 114 (12): 1943–1953.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2014.06.353. PMID   25091796.
  57. 1 2 Ver Ploeg, M.; Dutko, P.; Breneman, V. (2014-11-17). "Measuring Food Access and Food Deserts for Policy Purposes". Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 37 (2): 205–225. doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu035. ISSN   2040-5790.
  58. Bedore, Melanie (2014-05-23). "Food Desertification: Situating Choice and Class Relations within an Urban Political Economy of Declining Food Access". Studies in Social Justice. 8 (2): 207–228. doi: 10.26522/ssj.v8i2.1034 . ISSN   1911-4788.
  59. Walker, Renee E.; Keane, Christopher R.; Burke, Jessica G. (September 2010). "Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature". Health & Place. 16 (5): 876–884. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013. PMID   20462784. S2CID   4637240.
  60. "Food Equity and Access". Los Angeles Food Policy Council. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  61. Khazan, Olga (2017-12-28). "Food Swamps Are the New Food Deserts". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
  62. 1 2 Fleischhacker, S. E.; Evenson, K. R.; Rodriguez, D. A.; Ammerman, A. S. (May 2011). "A systematic review of fast food access studies: Fast food access review". Obesity Reviews. 12 (5): e460–e471. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00715.x . PMID   20149118. S2CID   205563369.
  63. Glanz, K.; Basil, M.; Maibach, E.; Goldberg, J.; Snyder, D. (1998). "Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 98 (10): 1118–1126. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00260-0. PMID   9787717.
  64. Stinson, Emma J.; Votruba, Susanne B.; Venti, Colleen; Perez, Marisol; Krakoff, Jonathan; Gluck, Marci E. (December 2018). "Food Insecurity is Associated with Maladaptive Eating Behaviors and Objectively Measured Overeating: Food Insecurity and Overeating". Obesity. 26 (12): 1841–1848. doi:10.1002/oby.22305. PMC   6249092 . PMID   30426695. S2CID   53305608.
  65. Grenen, Emily; Kent, Erin E.; Hennessy, Erin; Hamilton, Jada G.; Ferrer, Rebecca A. (August 2018). "Association Between Nutrition Resource Stress and Dietary Consumption: Results From a U.S. Nationally Representative Survey". Health Education & Behavior. 45 (4): 524–531. doi:10.1177/1090198117741940. ISSN   1090-1981. PMC   5930116 . PMID   29143540. S2CID   3824267.
  66. Venn, Danielle; Strazdins, Lyndall (January 2017). "Your money or your time? How both types of scarcity matter to physical activity and healthy eating". Social Science & Medicine. 172: 98–106. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.023. ISSN   0277-9536. PMID   27839899.
  67. Rose, Donald (July 2007). "Food Stamps, the Thrifty Food Plan, and meal preparation: the importance of the time dimension for US nutrition policy". Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 39 (4): 226–232. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.180. ISSN   1499-4046. PMID   17606249.
  68. Mancino, Lisa (May 2007). "Who Has Time To Cook? How Family Resources Influence Food Preparation" (PDF). United States Department of Agriculture.
  69. Lovelace, Sally; Rabiee-Khan, Fatemeh (2013-01-16). "Food choices made by low-income households when feeding their pre-school children: a qualitative study". Maternal & Child Nutrition. 11 (4): 870–881. doi:10.1111/mcn.12028. ISSN   1740-8695. PMC   6860335 . PMID   23320519. S2CID   12577875.
  70. Guthrie, Joanne F.; Lin, Biing-Hwan; Frazao, Elizabeth (May 2002). "Role of Food Prepared Away from Home in the American Diet, 1977-78 versus 1994-96: Changes and Consequences". Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 34 (3): 140–150. doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60083-3. ISSN   1499-4046. PMID   12047838.
  71. 1 2 Saksena, Michelle; Okrent, Abigail; Anekwe, Tobenna D.; Cho, Clare; Dicken, Chris; Elitzak, Howard; Guthrie, Joanne; Hamrick, Karen; Hyman, Jeffrey. "America's Eating Habits: Food Away From Home". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  72. Brown, Alison G M; Esposito, Layla E; Fisher, Rachel A; Nicastro, Holly L; Tabor, Derrick C; Walker, Jenelle R (2019-09-30). "Food insecurity and obesity: research gaps, opportunities, and challenges". Translational Behavioral Medicine. 9 (5): 980–987. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz117. ISSN   1869-6716. PMC   6937550 . PMID   31570918.
  73. Hadley, Craig; Crooks, Deborah L. (2012). "Coping and the biosocial consequences of food insecurity in the 21st century". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 149 (S55): 72–94. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22161 . PMID   23109261.
  74. Maxwell, Daniel G. (July 1996). "Measuring food insecurity: the frequency and severity of "coping strategies"" (PDF). Food Policy. 21 (3): 291–303. doi:10.1016/0306-9192(96)00005-X.
  75. Adam, Tanja C.; Epel, Elissa S. (July 2007). "Stress, eating and the reward system". Physiology & Behavior. 91 (4): 449–458. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.011. PMID   17543357. S2CID   4845263.
  76. "Stress and Eating". www.apa.org. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  77. Laraia, Barbara A.; Leak, Tashara M.; Tester, June M.; Leung, Cindy W. (February 2017). "Biobehavioral Factors That Shape Nutrition in Low-Income Populations". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 52 (2): S118–S126. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.003 . PMC   10281773 . PMID   28109413.
  78. Higginson, Andrew D.; McNamara, John M.; Dall, Sasha R. X. (2017). "Towards a behavioural ecology of obesity". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 40: e118. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16001436. hdl: 10871/23972 . ISSN   0140-525X. PMID   29342582. S2CID   44395781.
  79. Dhurandhar, Emily J. (August 2016). "The food-insecurity obesity paradox: A resource scarcity hypothesis". Physiology & Behavior. 162: 88–92. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.025. PMC   5394740 . PMID   27126969. S2CID   207377366.
  80. Ulrich-Lai, Yvonne M.; Fulton, Stephanie; Wilson, Mark; Petrovich, Gorica; Rinaman, Linda (2015-07-04). "Stress exposure, food intake and emotional state". Stress. 18 (4): 381–399. doi:10.3109/10253890.2015.1062981 (inactive 31 January 2024). ISSN   1025-3890. PMC   4843770 . PMID   26303312.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link)
  81. Caldwell, Ann E.; Sayer, R. Drew (January 2019). "Evolutionary considerations on social status, eating behavior, and obesity". Appetite. 132: 238–248. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.028. PMC   7039671 . PMID   30078673. S2CID   51922176.
  82. Almeida, David M.; Neupert, Shevaun D.; Banks, Sean R.; Serido, Joyce (2005-10-01). "Do Daily Stress Processes Account for Socioeconomic Health Disparities?". The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 60 (Special_Issue_2): S34–S39. doi:10.1093/geronb/60.Special_Issue_2.S34. ISSN   1079-5014. PMID   16251588.
  83. Hatch, Stephani L.; Dohrenwend, Bruce P. (2007). "Distribution of Traumatic and Other Stressful Life Events by Race/Ethnicity, Gender, SES and Age: A Review of the Research". American Journal of Community Psychology. 40 (3–4): 313–332. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9134-z. ISSN   1573-2770. PMID   17906927. S2CID   8009889.
  84. "Work, Stress and Health & Socioeconomic Status". www.apa.org. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  85. Cohen, Sheldon; Janicki-Deverts, Denise (June 2012). "Who's Stressed? Distributions of Psychological Stress in the United States in Probability Samples from 1983, 2006, and 20091: PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS IN THE U.S.". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 42 (6): 1320–1334. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x.