Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary

Last updated

The Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary is an area of 50 million square kilometres surrounding the continent of Antarctica where the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has banned all types of commercial whaling. To date, the IWC has designated two such sanctuaries, the other being the Indian Ocean Whale Sanctuary.

Contents

Area

The northern boundary of the sanctuary follows the 40°S parallel of latitude except in the Indian Ocean sector where it joins the southern boundary of the Indian Ocean Whale Sanctuary at 55°S, and around South America and into the South Pacific where the boundary is at 60°S.

History

The Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary was established by the IWC in 1994 with 23 countries supporting the agreement and Japan opposing it. [1]

The status of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary is reviewed and open to change by the IWC every 10 years. [2] During the 2004 meeting a proposal was made by Japan to remove the sanctuary, but it failed to reach the 75% majority required (it received 25 votes in favour and 30 votes against with two abstentions).

Controversy and enforcement

While commercial whaling is prohibited in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary, Japan's Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR) has continued to hunt whales inside the Sanctuary in accordance with a provision in the IWC charter permitting whaling for the purposes of scientific research. [3] Japan clarified its position on whaling in a number of forums, noting that while some whale species are threatened, many such as minke whale are not. [4] Some conservation groups such as the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society claim Japan's whaling operations are conducted in violation of the IWC charter, arguing that Japan's self-imposed annual quota of 1000 whale kills for research is not really scientific activity, but rather a veil to cover commercial fishing operations as whale meat ends up being sold in Japanese markets. [5]

In an open letter to the Japanese government, published in 2002 in The New York Times and sponsored by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), 21 scientists declared that they "believe Japan's whale 'research' program fails to meet minimum standards for credible science". They were "concerned that Japan's whaling program is not designed to answer scientific questions relevant to the management of whales; that Japan refuses to make the information it collects available for independent review; and that its research program lacks testable hypotheses or other performance indicators consistent with accepted scientific standards". They accused Japan of "using the pretense of scientific research to evade its commitments to the world community". [6]

The Australian delegation to the IWC has argued to repeal the provision that allows nations to harvest whales for scientific research, to no effect.

Japan, meanwhile, lodged a formal objection to the sanctuary with regard to minke whales, meaning that the terms of the sanctuary do not apply to its harvest of that species within the boundaries of the sanctuary. [7] Claiming the Japanese whaling fleet's actions to be illegal, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society acts against Japanese whaling ships engaged in yearly hunts, attempting to interrupt or cut short the whaling activities. [8] The ICR considers the activists' methods as constituting piracy, terrorism, and illegal harassment of the ICR fleet. [9] Critics of the ICR point out that recent scientific advances allow for the use of non-lethal techniques in cetacean research, such as biopsies or determination of cetacean dietary intake through analysis of DNA samples from whale feces. [10]

During the 2010/2011 whaling season, the ICR was forced to halt its whaling operations due to the actions of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, having harvested 172 whales (a fifth of their season quota). The ICR dispatched its whaling fleet as usual to the Northwest Pacific survey (JARPN II), with a quota for 260 whales, including 100 Minkes. [11] [12]

Dispute over legality

Japan has argued that the establishment of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary was in contravention of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) on which the IWC is based and is therefore illegal.

This view received strong support from Professor W. T. Burke of the University of Washington in his paper circulated as IWC Document Number IWC/48/33. He refers to Article V(2) of the ICRW, which states that the creation of any sanctuary must "be based on scientific findings" and "take into consideration the interests of the consumers of whale products and the whaling industry". [13] [14]

Prof Burke's interpretation is disputed by Prof Chris Wold of the Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College, who argued that the IWC must maintain both the conservation and whaling industry objectives of the ICRW. [15] This view is supported by Alexander Gillespie, Professor of Law at the University of Waikato, who reasoned in his 2006 book, Whaling Diplomacy, that phrases such as "best interests of the whaling industry" must now consider commercial non-consumptive use (such as whale watching). [16]

As there is no settlement procedure in the IWC for this type of dispute, Japan has asked the IWC to submit its case to a relevant legal body for analysis. This proposal was rejected by a majority of IWC members. [17]

International Court of Justice (ICJ) proceedings

On 31 May 2010, the Australian Government lodged formal proceedings against Japan in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, Netherlands. [18] In a joint ministerial statement, the government stated that it "has not taken this decision lightly."

On 5 January 2011, leaked US diplomatic cables revealed that the Australian legal challenge to Japanese whaling was heavily influenced by domestic political pressures and Australian government advisers were left deeply pessimistic about the prospects of success in the International Court. In its reports to Washington, the US Embassy reported that Australian government contacts were stating that the legal proceedings "... would be unlikely to stop the whale hunt entirely, but could well force modifications that would make it more difficult for the Japanese". [19] The Australian public overwhelmingly supports governmental efforts to stop Japanese whaling, even at risk of losing valuable trade relations. [20] The New Zealand government lodged a "Declaration of Intervention" with the ICJ on 6 February 2013, [21] in which it deemed Japan as ineligible for a Special Permit that would allow whaling on the basis of scientific research. [22]

As a result of the Australian government's 2010 application, a court case was heard at the ICJ. The hearing ran from 26 June 2013 until 6 July 2013. In its deposition to the ICJ, the Australian government has claimed that Japan "has breached and is continuing to breach" its obligations under the international convention, and further asserted that Japan has refused to accept International Whaling Commission (IWC) recommendations. Solicitor-General of Australia Justin Gleeson appeared for Australia before the ICJ. [23]

The ICJ's 16-judge bench received and then decided upon the case. Rothwell stated that the case "is a complex one which raises novel legal issues not previously considered by any international court". [24]

Tony Press, CEO of the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre at the University of Tasmania, Australia, provided weekly reports of the ICJ hearings for The Conversation Australia media publication. Following the second week, Press relayed that Japan articulated in certain terms its intentions in the Southern Ocean: "the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry", [25] further explaining that a whale must be killed to obtain certain types of information, such as the collection of ear plugs to estimate the age of a whale. During the second week, Professor Lars Walløe, of the University of Oslo and a former Norwegian Commissioner to the Whaling Commission was presented by Japan as its sole expert witness. [25]

During the week beginning 8 July 2013, New Zealand delivered its intervention, in which it provided a history of the origin of the 1946 Whaling Convention and Australian Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus affirmed that his nation had not "colluded" with New Zealand to launch the ICJ proceedings. Dreyfus concluded Australia's contribution by emphasising the friendship shared by Australia and Japan, and stated: "Australia respectfully requests the Court to bring Japan's whaling program to an end." [26]

The ICJ hearing concluded on 16 July 2013. In Japan's final presentation Professor Payam Akhavan of Harvard University stated: "it would not be an exaggeration to say that Australia's case now hangs by a thread". [27]

Outcome

On 31 March 2014 the ICJ ruled that Japan's JARPA II whaling program "can broadly be characterized as 'scientific research'" but failed to comply with three provisions of the Schedule to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. The Court ordered that "Japan revoke any extant authorization, permit or licence to kill, take or treat whales in relation to JARPA II, and refrain from granting any further permits under Article VIII, paragraph 1, of the Convention, in pursuance of that programme". [28] The court's judges agreed with Australia that the number of Japanese scientific research publications were not proportionate to the number of animals killed. [29] Two former Australian Environment ministers, Peter Garrett and Ian Campbell, among other Australian politicians applauded the decision and stated their hopes that Japan will respect it. [30] [31] The decision of the ICJ is final and the right of appeal does not apply in this context; [22] Japan said it would abide by the decision. [32] [33]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling</span> International environmental agreement

The International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling is an international environmental agreement aimed at the "proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry". It governs the commercial, scientific, and aboriginal subsistence whaling practices of 88 member nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whaling</span> Hunting of whales

Whaling is the hunting of whales for their usable products such as meat and blubber, which can be turned into a type of oil that was important in the Industrial Revolution. Whaling was practiced as an organized industry as early as 875 AD. By the 16th century, it had become the principal industry in the Basque coastal regions of Spain and France. The whaling industry spread throughout the world and became very profitable in terms of trade and resources. Some regions of the world's oceans, along the animals' migration routes, had a particularly dense whale population and became targets for large concentrations of whaling ships, and the industry continued to grow well into the 20th century. The depletion of some whale species to near extinction led to the banning of whaling in many countries by 1969 and to an international cessation of whaling as an industry in the late 1980s.

The International Whaling Commission (IWC) is a specialised regional fishery management organisation, established under the terms of the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) to "provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minke whale</span> Species of whale

The minke whale, or lesser rorqual, is a species complex of baleen whale. The two species of minke whale are the common minke whale and the Antarctic minke whale. The minke whale was first described by the Danish naturalist Otto Fabricius in 1780, who assumed it must be an already known species and assigned his specimen to Balaena rostrata, a name given to the northern bottlenose whale by Otto Friedrich Müller in 1776. In 1804, Bernard Germain de Lacépède described a juvenile specimen of Balaenoptera acuto-rostrata. The name is a partial translation of Norwegian minkehval, possibly after a Norwegian whaler named Meincke, who mistook a northern minke whale for a blue whale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antarctic minke whale</span> Species of mammal

The Antarctic minke whale or southern minke whale is a species of minke whale within the suborder of baleen whales. It is the second smallest rorqual after the common minke whale and the third smallest baleen whale. Although first scientifically described in the mid-19th century, it was not recognized as a distinct species until the 1990s. Once ignored by the whaling industry due to its small size and low oil yield, the Antarctic minke was able to avoid the fate of other baleen whales and maintained a large population into the 21st century, numbering in the hundreds of thousands. Surviving to become the most abundant baleen whale in the world, it is now one of the mainstays of the industry alongside its cosmopolitan counterpart the common minke. It is primarily restricted to the Southern Hemisphere and feeds mainly on euphausiids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern right whale</span> Species of whale

The southern right whale is a baleen whale, one of three species classified as right whales belonging to the genus Eubalaena. Southern right whales inhabit oceans south of the Equator, between the latitudes of 20° and 60° south. In 2009 the global population was estimated to be approximately 13,600.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sea Shepherd Conservation Society</span> American marine conservation organization

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS) is a non-profit, marine conservation activism organization based in Friday Harbor on San Juan Island, Washington, in the United States. Sea Shepherd employs direct action tactics to achieve its goals, most famously by deploying its fleet of ships to track, report on and actively impede the work of fishing vessels believed to be engaged in illegal and unregulated activities causing the unsustainable exploitation of marine life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institute of Cetacean Research</span> Controversial Japanese whaling body that purports to be focused on research

The Institute of Cetacean Research is a research organization specializing in the "biological and social sciences related to whales".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whaling in Japan</span> Commercial hunting of whales by the Japanese fishing industry

Japanese whaling, in terms of active hunting of whales, is estimated by the Japan Whaling Association to have begun around the 12th century. However, Japanese whaling on an industrial scale began around the 1890s when Japan started to participate in the modern whaling industry, at that time an industry in which many countries participated.

The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) is an Australian environmental not-for-profit organisation. It was founded in 1965 as the Queensland Littoral Society before changing its name to the Australian Littoral Society and then finally in 1995 to its current title. It works on protecting the health and vitality of Australia's coasts and oceans.

<i>Nisshin Maru</i>

The Nisshin Maru (日新丸) was the primary vessel of the Japanese whaling fleet and was the world's only whaler factory ship. It was the research base ship for the Institute of Cetacean Research for 2002 to 2007. It had a tonnage of 8,145 GT and is the largest member and flagship of the five-ship whaling fleet, headed by leader Shigetoshi Nishiwaki. The ship was based in Japan in Shimonoseki harbor and was owned by Tokyo-based Kyodo Senpaku, which is a subsidiary of the Institute of Cetacean Research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine conservation activism</span> Non-governmental efforts to bring about change in marine conservation

Marine conservation activism is the efforts of non-governmental organizations and individuals to bring about social and political change in the area of marine conservation. Marine conservation is properly conceived as a set of management strategies for the protection and preservation of ecosystems in oceans and seas. Activists raise public awareness and support for conservation, while pushing governments and corporations to practice sound ocean management, create conservation policy, and enforce existing laws and policy through effective regulation. There are many different kinds of organizations and agencies that work toward these common goals. They all are a part of the growing movement that is ocean conservation. These organizations fight for many causes including stopping pollution, overfishing, whaling and by-catching, and supporting marine protected areas.

MY <i>Steve Irwin</i> Vessel used by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

The MV Steve Irwin was the 59-metre (194 ft) flagship of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, and was used in their direct action campaigns against whaling and against illegal fisheries activities. The vessel was built in 1975 and formerly served as a Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency conservation enforcement patrol boat, the FPV Westra, for 28 years.

<i>Whale Wars</i> Television series

Whale Wars is a weekly American documentary-style reality television series that premiered on November 7, 2008 on the Animal Planet cable channel. The program follows Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, as he and the crew aboard their various vessels attempted to stop the killing of whales by Japanese vessels (whalers) off the coast of Antarctica.

MY <i>Bob Barker</i> Sea Shepherd Conservation Society ship

The MY Bob Barker was a ship owned and operated by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, named after American television game show host and animal rights activist Bob Barker, whose donation of $5 million to the society facilitated the purchase of the ship. She began operating for the group in late 2009 / early 2010 in its campaign against whaling by Japanese fisheries. In October 2010, Sea Shepherd stated that Bob Barker had completed a major refit in Hobart, Tasmania. Hobart became the ship's honorary home port in 2014.

The Shōnan Maru 2 is a Japanese security vessel, operated by the Japanese Fisheries Agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sea Shepherd Conservation Society operations</span> Direct action marine conservation operations

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society engages in various demonstrations, campaigns, and tactical operations at sea and elsewhere, including conventional protests and direct actions to protect marine wildlife. Sea Shepherd operations have included interdiction against commercial fishing, shark poaching and finning, seal hunting and whaling. Many of their activities have been called piracy or terrorism by their targets and by the ICRW. Sea Shepherd says that they have taken more than 4,000 volunteers on operations over a period of 30 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whale conservation</span> Conservation of whales

Whale conservation refers to the conservation of whales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-whaling</span>

Anti-whaling refers to actions taken by those who seek to end whaling in various forms, whether locally or globally in the pursuit of marine conservation. Such activism is often a response to specific conflicts with pro-whaling countries and organizations that practice commercial whaling and/or research whaling, as well as with indigenous groups engaged in subsistence whaling. Some anti-whaling factions have received criticism and legal action for extreme methods including violent direct action. The term anti-whaling may also be used to describe beliefs and activities related to these actions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern bottlenose whale</span> Species of mammal

The southern bottlenose whale is a species of whale, in the Ziphiid family, one of two members of the genus Hyperoodon. Seldom observed, the southern bottlenose whale is resident in Antarctic waters. The species was first described by English zoologist William Henry Flower in 1882, based on a water-worn skull from Lewis Island, in the Dampier Archipelago, Western Australia. They live in deep ocean waters over 1000 meters.

References

  1. ↑ "Lee condemns latest Japanese whaling venture". The New Zealand Herald . 6 November 2001. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
  2. ↑ "IWC | International Whaling Commission". Archived from the original on 18 May 2008. Retrieved 7 July 2008.
  3. ↑ "Japan's whale research programs (JARPN and JARPNII)". The Institute of Cetacean Research. Archived from the original on 2 June 2011. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
  4. ↑ "Japanese Government's position". Sydney.au.emb-japan.go.jp. 23 March 2006. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
  5. ↑ "Whale Wars : Why does Japan sell meat from research whaling?: Animal Planet". Animal.discovery.com. 15 May 2012. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  6. ↑ "AN OPEN LETTER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN ON "SCIENTIFIC WHALING"" (PDF). 20 May 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 August 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2011.
  7. ↑ "IWC | International Whaling Commission". Archived from the original on 3 July 2008. Retrieved 7 July 2008.
  8. ↑ "Sea Shepherd Turns the Tables on the Whalers – Sea Shepherd Conservation Society". Seashepherd.org. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
  9. ↑ "ICR : Harassment & terrorism". Icrwhale.org. Archived from the original on 17 October 2011. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  10. ↑ "Why Japan's whaling activities are not research". Archived from the original on 18 February 2013.
  11. ↑ "Archived copy". onlyagaijin.com. Archived from the original on 26 March 2012. Retrieved 3 February 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  12. ↑ "水産庁/「2011年度 第二期北西太平洋鯨類捕獲調査（沖合調査）」の開始について". Jfa.maff.go.jp. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  13. ↑ "Key Documents". Iwcoffice.org. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  14. ↑ Chairman's Report of the 47th Meeting. (IWC. 1995). pp.23-24
  15. ↑ Wold, Chris (21 June 2000). "Legal Opinion on the Competence of the IWC to Include Humane Treatment and Human and Cetacean Health Concerns in the RMS". Lclark.edu. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
  16. ↑ Gillespie, Alexander (2005), Whaling Diplomacy: Defining Issues in International Environmental Law, Northampton MA: Edward Elgar Publications, p. 267, ISBN   1-84542-107-8
  17. ↑ "CITES and the IWC:The Fall of Conservation?". Archived from the original on 12 August 2007. Retrieved 7 July 2008. – Section 5.6
  18. ↑ Commonwealth of Australia (31 May 2010). "Application Instituting Proceedings" (PDF). Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan). The Hague: International Court of Justice. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 March 2013.
  19. ↑ Dorling, Philip (5 January 2011). "'Doomed' whaling fight aimed at saving Labor vote". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  20. ↑ Hanson, Fergus (2008). "Poll: An International Policy Publication". The Lowy Institute. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008.
  21. ↑ "Declaration of Intervention of New Zealand" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. 6 February 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 June 2013.
  22. 1 2 Press, Tony; Jabour, Julia (17 April 2013). "Australia takes Japan to court on whaling – where to now?". The Conversation. The Conversation Media Group.
  23. ↑ Drape, Julian (26 June 2013). "Barbs traded in Aust v Japan whaling case". The Australian.
  24. ↑ Rothwell, Professor Donald R. (27 June 2013). "Whales in court: Australia v Japan in The Hague". The Conversation Australia.
  25. 1 2 Press, Tony (5 July 2013). "Whaling in the Antarctic: Week 2 – Japan responds". The Conversation. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
  26. ↑ Press, Tony (13 July 2013). "Whaling in the Antarctic: New Zealand intervenes, Australia concludes". The Conversation Australia.
  27. ↑ Press, Tony (17 July 2013). "Whaling in the Antarctic: the case concludes". The Conversation Australia.
  28. ↑ "The Court finds that Japan's whaling programme in the Antarctic (JARPA II) is not in accordance with three provisions of the Schedule to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling" (PDF), Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), The Hague, Netherlands: International Court of Justice, 31 March 2014, archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2014
  29. ↑ Thomson, Cask J. (31 March 2014). "Japan's Whaling Is Commercial and Not Scientific; International Court of Justice Rules". Words with meaning. Archived from the original on 2 April 2014.
  30. ↑ "Japan ordered to immediately stop whaling in Antarctic as International Court of Justice rules program was not carried out for scientific purposes". Australia: ABC News. 1 April 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
  31. ↑ "Japan's whaling program not for scientific purposes, rules International Court of Justice". Australia: ABC News. 31 March 2014.
  32. ↑ "Japan accepts court ban on Antarctic whaling". BBC News. 31 March 2014.
  33. ↑ Sterling, Toby (31 March 2014). "World court: Japanese whaling not scientific". MSN News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2 April 2014. Retrieved 8 September 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.