Storming of the Legislative Council Complex | |||
---|---|---|---|
Part of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests | |||
Date | 1–2 July 2019 13:30 – 01:00 (UTC+08:00) | ||
Location | 22°16′52″N114°09′58″E / 22.281087°N 114.166127°E | ||
Goals | Government fulfillment of the five key demands of the anti-extradition bill movement | ||
Methods | Occupation of the Legislative Council Complex and major roads | ||
Resulted in |
| ||
Parties | |||
| |||
Number | |||
| |||
Casualties and losses | |||
|
2019–2020 Hong Kong protests |
---|
On 1 July 2019, anti-government protesters in Hong Kong sieged, broke into, and subsequently occupied the Legislative Council Complex during the campaign to halt the enactment of the Fugitive Offenders amendment bill. Hundreds of protesters broke through the glass walls and metal doors and entered the building, then ransacked and vandalised the interior with anti-government and anti-PRC slogans. The storming is considered a watershed event in the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests; [1] it was the most violent episode in their initial stage. [2] Nine days later, on 9 July, the Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, announced that the extradition bill was "dead". [3]
On 1 July 2019, as Hong Kong marked the 22nd anniversary of its 1997 handover to China, the annual pro-democracy protest march organised by CHRF claimed a record turnout of 550,000; police placed the estimate at around 190,000, [4] [5] while independent organisations using scientific methods calculated that participation was in the region of 250,000 people. [6] [7] A group of activists splintered off from the peaceful march, and headed towards the Legislative Council Complex. [1] Police estimated that by 9:00 pm, up to 30,000 protesters had gathered around the building. [8]
At around 9:00 pm, hundreds of protesters stormed the legislature after breaking through the glass walls and metal doors of the building. [9] Some estimates put the total number of protesters and reporters in the building at no greater than 300. [10] Police lay in wait while front-line protesters were ramming the main glass door to the building. As the protesters smashed through the secondary gates and entered the building, police initially retreated to avoid confrontation and give the demonstrators the run of the building. [11] Protesters damaged portraits of former pro-Beijing presidents of the Legislative Council, spray-painted slogans such as "It was you who taught me peaceful marches did not work" (是你教我和平遊行是沒用) and "There are no rioters, only tyrannical rule" (没有暴徒祗有暴政), [12] [13] [14] smashed furniture, defaced the Hong Kong emblem, waved the Union Flag and displayed the colonial Hong Kong flag on the podium. [15] [16] At the same time, protesters hung up signs and installed barricades, warning others not to damage books in the library while protesting. [11]
At about 11 pm, occupiers of the legislature were given an ultimatum by the police to leave the building and disperse, or be removed by force. As the evacuation gathered pace, four protesters opted to stay and face arrest but were carried out of the complex by fellow protesters, reflecting the movement's praxis of "Preserve yourself and the collective; no division." [3]
The police started using tear gas to disperse protesters around the Legislative Council complex at 12:05 am, and reached the building 15 minutes later. [17] The government later stated that 15 police officers had been injured in the retaking of the complex. [18]
Protesters broke into the locked Legislative Council building by smashing thick glass doors and prying open metal security curtains. After they had broken through late into the night, they poured into the building and spray-painted slogans on the walls and caused extensive damage. More than 60 glass doors and panes were broken. [19] Protesters vented their anger and frustration at the government for failing to respond to any of their demands. [20] They climbed onto desks in the legislature's main chamber and reached up to spray the official city emblem with black paint, obliterating the portion which read "People's Republic of China", only leaving Hong Kong's part of the emblem untouched, reflecting protesters’ desire to preserve the freedoms, autonomy and judicial independence of Hong Kong, while maintaining its legislature and economic system separate from mainland China. [21] Slogans were also spray-painted on the walls in Chinese and English. "Destroy the Chinese Communist Party," read one. "Hong Kong is not China," said another. [20] One slogan – directed towards Carrie Lam – sprayed in Chinese on a column inside the building read: "It was you who told me peaceful marches did not work" (是你教我和平遊行是没用). Lam had refused to accede to any of the demands despite the massive turnouts at protest marches. [12] [13] [14] [21] Media including CNN and The Guardian noted that the messages protesters sprayed on the wall or displayed using banners, in particular, the phrase "If we burn, you burn with us!" from Suzanne Collins' novel Mockingjay encapsulated protesters' desperation and reflected their pessimism and hardened stance, in stark contrast to the Umbrella Movement. [22] [23]
The fire-prevention and security systems in the chambers were damaged; papers, rubbish, and umbrellas were strewn in lobbies and rooms. [19] Portraits of Andrew Leung, Rita Fan and Jasper Tsang – respectively the incumbent and two former Legislative Council presidents of the SAR era – were defaced, and went missing; parts of wooden picture frames were all that remained of their portraits hung on the wall. [20] [24] The security office and public complaints department were the most heavily damaged: hard disk drives and handheld radios were taken, while security guards said their lockers had been ransacked. [24] Although protesters had destroyed the glass doors of the Legislative Council library, a sign that read “Protect the books, and don't do any damage” was put up; other signs urged protesters to spare the artefacts on display. Protesters paid for drinks they took from the Legislative Council canteen. This was underlined by the sign stuck to the refrigerator, which read, “We’re not thieves, we won't steal.” [24] Protesters blamed the occupation and acts of property damage to be the result of Carrie Lam's "lack of positive response to the public." [25] It was also reported that recent activist suicides had sparked anger and desperation among the protesters, further contributing to the protest on 1 July. [26]
Workers clearing up after the occupation boarded up shattered windows, and police carted away evidence for investigation. Legislative Council president Andrew Leung estimated the cost of repairing the damage by the storming would amount to over HK$40 million. [19]
A colonial-era Hong Kong flag was placed on the podium inside the occupied Legislative Council governing chambers as a tribute to Hong Kong's history under the British. It was seen as a call on the former colonial rulers to confront China regarding the recent events. [21] Student activist Brian Leung Kai-ping, the only person who dared to remove their mask during the siege, climbed onto a legislator's desk and urged activists to stay united and remain in the Legislative Council chamber. He presented a new 10-point manifesto which protesters called the "Admiralty Declaration", [27] decrying crony capitalism, the rotten government and rotten boroughs that underlay the political system, calling for greater freedom and democracy. He said: "The absence of a democratic election is the root of all of the vicious cycles. We must correct the right to elect, the right to nominate, and the right to be elected, which people should have to participate in the Legislative Council. We must fairly re-arrange and reform the seats, the method for election of the Chief Executive, and eliminate unfair and outdated functional constituency." [28] Leung said afterwards: "As police were drawing closer and closer, after some deliberation, most decided to end the siege. I volunteered to be in front of the camera to read out the key demands of protesters in the chamber. The last thing I wished to see was to have no clear demands put on the table." [29] [30] Risking arrest, he removed his mask to make the address, saying later that "Hongkongers have nothing left to lose. Hongkongers cannot [afford to] lose any more." [29] [31] Leung is believed to have left Hong Kong the next day. [30]
After the protest, demonstrators and legislators condemned the Hong Kong police for deliberately allowing protesters to ram the glass doors and windows of the Legislative Council in front of cameras and television crews for hours, without any arrests or clearance. A journalist from The New York Times remarked on the "notable [and] ominous" absence of the police and questioned the lack of action to prevent the legislature from being stormed, asserting that the police force "no longer sees its purpose as maintaining public order and is, instead, carrying out the government's political agenda." [32] The police explained that their decision to retreat was after "considering a number of factors". [33] However, observers have asserted it was allowed to happen to manipulate public opinion and blame protesters in an attempt to seize the moral high ground. [34] [35]
Carrie Lam held a press conference at 4 am stating that she acknowledged the peaceful and orderly march, but condemned strongly the "violence and vandalism by protesters who stormed into the Legislative Council building". [36] However, Lam dodged questions regarding recent deaths, and the government left the unanswered questions out of the official transcript, an act criticised by the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) for hindering public's right to know. The Hong Kong government's Information Services Department responded that the transcript released was not "verbatim". [37]
Nine days after the occupation, on 9 July, the government held a press conference during which Carrie Lam announced that the extradition bill was "dead". [3]
Unlike the final weeks of Umbrella Revolution which saw protesters being condemned by democrats, student groups and other critics as they smashed the reinforced glass walls of the Legislative Council with metal barricades, the public opinion of the protests was not significantly affected following the storming of the Legislative Council in 2019. Austin Ramzy from The New York Times stated that "the voices of restraint were quickly drowned out", as protesters and their supporters became increasingly tolerant to violent actions. The incident, ultimately, reinforced unity among protesters. [38]
On 3 July, police arrested one man for forced entry into the Legislative Council Complex. [20] Three men were arrested on 27 August for "entering or staying in the chamber area" during the storming on 1 July. [19] By early 5 July, there had been at least 66 arrests and the first formal charges had been laid in connection with the incident. [39] Seven individuals were charged on 30 September for the unlawful intrusion, including Althea Suen, former president of the University of Hong Kong student union. One was further charged with one count of criminal damage – vandalism to a copy of the Basic Law found inside the Legislative Council building; another faced two additional counts of criminal damage – to gates of the Legislative Council building and the adjacent central government complex – and two counts of unlawful assembly. [40]
Ma Kai-Chung, a reporter for localist online news portal Passion Times, was arraigned at Eastern Court on 3 October on one count of entering or remaining in the Legislative Council chamber on 1 July. The HKJA expressed its extreme concern over the charge, saying that it was reasonable for journalists to exercise their power of the fourth estate. [40] Ma had been arrested on 30 September along with activist Ventus Lau and actor Gregory Wong and held under the charge of "conspiracy to criminal damage", as well as "entering or remaining in precincts of Chamber" under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance. [1] [41]
Lawmaker Cheng Chung-tai was arrested on 30 September for "conspiracy to commit criminal damage" during the storming of the Legislative Council. [42] Police arrested a member of Demosisto for "conspiracy to commit criminal damage" and "entering or remaining in precincts of [the] Chamber" on 9 January 2020 at the Hong Kong International Airport. [43]
On 16 March 2024, twelve activists who had taken part in the storming were sentenced in a District Court to between 54 and 82 months in jail for rioting. The judge stressed that besides the actual damage to the building, the incident had a symbolic meaning in that it was "challenging the Hong Kong government and even weakening its governance", and had had a "long-lasting effect on society". [2]
Leung Kwok-hung, also known by his nickname "Long Hair" (長毛), is a Hong Kong politician and social activist. He was a member of the Legislative Council, representing the New Territories East. A Trotskyist in his youth, he was a founding member of the Revolutionary Marxist League. He became a political icon with his long hair and Che Guevara T-shirt in the protests before he was elected to the Legislative Council in 2004. In 2006, he co-founded a social democratic party, the League of Social Democrats (LSD) of which he was the chairman from 2012 to 2016.
The Hong Kong 1 July protests was an annual protest rally originally held by the Civil Human Rights Front from the day of handover in 1997 on the HKSAR establishment day. However, it was not until 2003 that the march drew large public attention by opposing the legislation of Basic Law Article 23. The 2003 protest, with 500,000 marchers, was the second-largest protest seen in Hong Kong since the 1997 handover.
The New Year marches were a fixture on the political calendar in Hong Kong. Thousands took to the streets demanding universal suffrage as part of the ongoing democratic development as well as to protest against further influence of mainland China in Hong Kong. Lead organiser for marches was the Civil Human Rights Front (CHRF). The Front disbanded in August 2021, following accusations by police in April that it was suspected of operating illegally due to not having been registered as organisation; its last remaining spokesperson Figo Chan had been jailed in May in relation to the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests.
The administration of Leung Chun-ying as Chief Executive of Hong Kong, officially referred to as "The 4th term Chief Executive of Hong Kong" relates to the period of governance of Hong Kong since the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong, between 1 July 2012 and 30 June 2017.
Abdull Ghafar Khan, better known as Phillip Khan, is a Hong Kong businessman and political activist. A Pakistani national born and raised in Hong Kong, Khan's ambitions to stand for election to the city's Legislative Council reportedly have been blocked by the refusal of the Hong Kong Immigration Department to consider his application for naturalisation as a Chinese national.
The Legislative Council Complex is the headquarters of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. The complex plays a central role in the legislative process of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), and it has been a focal point for political events and public demonstrations.
Ted Hui Chi-fung is a Hong Kong politician. He formerly represented the Chung Wan constituency in the Central and Western District Council, and formerly he was the Legislative Councillor for the Hong Kong Island constituency. Fearing prosecution by the Government of Hong Kong, he announced his self-exile in Denmark and withdrawal from the Democratic Party in December 2020.
The Sixth Legislative Council of Hong Kong was the sixth meeting of the legislative branch of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. Running from 1 October 2016 to 31 December 2021, it was the longest legislative session in Hong Kong history, lasted for five years and three months. The term of the session was originally from 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2020, but was extended by the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) due to the postponement of the 2020 Legislative Council election.
The Hong Kong Legislative Council members' oath-taking controversy was a series of events surrounding the oaths of office of a dozen pro-democracy and localist camp members-elect of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo) on 12 October 2016 which have resulted in the disqualification of six members, Sixtus "Baggio" Leung and Yau Wai-ching of Youngspiration, who were unseated by the court on 15 November 2016, and Leung Kwok-hung, Nathan Law, Yiu Chung-yim and Lau Siu-lai on 14 July 2017.
The 2019 Hong Kong District Council elections were held on 24 November 2019 for all 18 District Councils of Hong Kong. 452 seats from all directly elected constituencies, out of the 479 seats in total, were contested. Nearly three million people voted, equivalent to 71 per cent of registered voters, an unprecedented turnout in the electoral history of Hong Kong. The election was widely viewed as a de facto referendum on the concurrent anti-extradition protests.
The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 was a proposed bill regarding extradition to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance in relation to special surrender arrangements and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Ordinance so that arrangements for mutual legal assistance can be made between Hong Kong and any place outside Hong Kong. The bill was proposed by the Hong Kong government in February 2019 to establish a mechanism for transfers of fugitives not only for Taiwan, but also for Mainland China and Macau, which are currently excluded in the existing laws.
The 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests were a series of demonstrations against the Hong Kong government's introduction of a bill to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance in regard to extradition. It was the largest series of demonstrations in the history of Hong Kong.
The period from March to June 2019 in the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests is considered the early stage of the movement. Until the first mass demonstrations in June, protests were focused on the withdrawal of the extradition bill. In June, protesters started to lay out five demands. The additional four demands concerned the reactions of the Hong Kong government and especially, the police to the protests, and called more broadly for full democracy in the city.
The founding cause of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests was the proposed legislation of the 2019 Hong Kong extradition bill. However, other causes have been pointed out, such as demands for democratic reform, the Causeway Bay Books disappearances, or a general fear of losing a "high degree of autonomy". The Hong Kong protests are unique in this respect from democracy protests in general, which are often provoked by economic grievances. Subsequent actions by the police, such as mass arrests and police violence, as well as what was perceived to be an illegitimate legislative process of the bill, sparked additional protests throughout the city.
This segment of the timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests covers the month of July 2019. The anniversary of the 1997 handover of Hong Kong to China on 1 July saw large daytime protests. In the evening of that day, protesters stormed the Legislative Council Building and defaced symbols, with police only moving in after midnight. This incident, which was sharply condemned by the government of Carrie Lam, did however not lead to a split between peaceful and violent protesters. Observers linked the understanding of the non-violent protesters for the violent wing to the lack of willingness of the Lam government to engage in dialogue about the protesters' five demands. Apart from major protests on Sundays, there were also mostly peaceful demonstrations during the week.
The conduct of the Hong Kong Police Force is a subject of controversy during the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. Tactics employed by the force have led to misconduct allegations and protesters have accused the Hong Kong government of using the police as a method to resolve a "lingering political crisis." Actions taken by the police force and the Hong Kong government have caused mixed reactions inside Hong Kong and in the general international community. Allegations against the police include excessive use of force, force against unspecific targets, and arrest without warrant. These allegations have been presented in various media both supporting and detracting from the complaints, such as through amateur video. In general, the spirit, rumors, videos, and other media shared by the public have caused a drop in support for the police force, and an Amnesty International report accused the police of using excessive force against civilians. One of the objectives of the 2019–2020 protests is establishment of an independent inquiry system into said allegations.
The 2019 Prince Edward station attack, also known as the 31 August MTR station incident, was an incident in which Hong Kong police indiscriminately attacked passengers while arresting protesters who were returning home via Prince Edward station, on the night of 31 August 2019, after a protest was held that same day. The event was described as the police version of the 2019 Yuen Long attack, and the police have been criticised as acting like terrorists. Rumours have been circulated that several protesters were beaten to death at the station, but the police have rejected allegations. However, a mourning vigil was set up by a group of residents outside one exit of the station.
The 12 June 2019 Hong Kong protest, also known as "612 incident". refers to an incident of intense confrontation between anti-extradition bill protesters and the Hong Kong Police Force, occurring on 12 June 2019 outside the Government Headquarters in Admiralty, Hong Kong Island. The protest was sparked by the government's introduction of the controversial Fugitive Offenders amendment bill, which was set to go through second reading on 12 June despite mass opposition.
The 2020 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was originally scheduled on 6 September 2020 until it was postponed by the government. On 31 July 2020, Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced that she was invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance to postpone the election under the emergency powers granted to her by it, citing the recent resurgence of the COVID-19 cases, adding that the move was supported by Beijing.
On 11 November 2020, 15 Hong Kong pro-democracy members of the Legislative Council announced their resignations in protest against the decision of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) which bars Legislative Council members from supporting Hong Kong independence, refusing to recognise Beijing's sovereignty over Hong Kong, seeking help from "foreign countries or foreign forces to interfere in the affairs of the region" or committing "other acts that endanger national security" that resulted in the disqualification of pro-democracy legislators Alvin Yeung, Dennis Kwok, Kwok Ka-ki and Kenneth Leung. In July 2020, the four had been barred from running in the subsequently postponed Legislative Council election originally scheduled for September 2020. The resignation en masse left the Legislative Council membership dwindled to 43 out of the total number of 70 seats, with virtually no opposition for the first time since the 1997 handover.
遊行大致完成後,立法會大樓周邊有多達3萬名示威者
【22:36】根據「反送中已核實資訊頻道」消息,會議廳內仍有兩百至三百名示威者以及記者。