Sulphur Crisis of 1840

Sulphur Crisis of 1840
Date 9 April 1840–21 July 1840 Location Kingdom of the Two Sicilies Result Cancellation of French contract, several merchantships detained and searched
Belligerents
United Kingdom	Kingdom of the Two Sicilies
Commanders and leaders
Lord Palmerston Robert Stopford	Ferdinand II

The Sulphur Crisis of 1840 (also known as the Sulphur War of 1840 or Anglo-Neapolitan Sulphur Crisis) was a conflict between the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies and the United Kingdom. In the 19th century, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies maintained a large sulphur mining industry and was responsible for most of the world's production. In industrialising, British demand for sulphur increased considerably. ^{[lower-alpha 1]} The nation had a very favourable treaty with the Two Sicilies, negotiated in 1816. The Sulphur Crisis of 1840 occurred when King Ferdinand II gave a monopoly of the sulphur industry to a French firm. The British argued it violated the 1816 trade agreement. A peaceful solution was eventually negotiated by France. ^[2]

Ferdinand II

Background

Sulphuric acid is one of the most important chemicals in the world. It is used to manufacture fertiliser, and is also important in mineral processing and oil refining. It has a wide range of end applications including as an electrolyte in lead-acid batteries and in dehydrating compounds. ^{[3] [4] [5] [6]} Demand surged during the Industrial Revolution, as the acid is used in finishing textiles. ^[7] Between 1832 and 1836, sulphur production doubled. ^[8] Until the invention of the Frasch process in 1891, sulphur extracted from volcanic rock in Sicily by the Sicilian method made up the vast majority of the world's production. ^{[9] [10]} In 1816, a treaty between the Two Sicilies and Great Britain was signed that gave British merchants large concessions, such as a 10% reduction in the customs duty due on imports from and exports to Britain, and gave British merchants a large advantage trading in Southern Italy. ^[11] It also gave Britain most favoured nation status. ^[12] The British defended their rights zealously and attempted to negotiate a new treaty that was even more favourable to them. ^[11]

Crisis

In 1836, then King of the Two Sicilies, Ferdinand II, began negotiating with French merchants an agreement granting French merchants control over the sulphur trade. ^[1] An initial plan was submitted by French merchants Amato Taix and Arsene Aycard on 1 May 1836. ^[13] Though many Sicilians supported the plan, it was abandoned after British resistance. In September 1837, Ferdinand II revived such talks with Taix and Aycard, regarding the production and export of sulphur. Ferdinand II was trying to encourage the price of sulphur to rise. ^{[1] [14]}

An agreement was approved by the Consulta—the kingdom's general council —on 15 December 1837, ^{[13] [15]} announced on 4 July 1838, ^[1] and signed on 9 July. ^[13] It gave the Frenchmen control over sulphur exports from Sicily. It was essentially a monopoly, making it unprofitable for any other merchants to trade sulphur. This angered the British, who had previously controlled the trade. ^[12] The agreement immediately crippled sulphur imports to the United Kingdom which fell from 44,653 tons in 1838 to 22,160 tons in 1839. The price of the sulphur also increased by 100%. ^[1]

British merchants argued that the new agreement violated the 1816 treaty, and claimed that their commercial interests were damaged. ^[16] In response, Lord Palmerston, the British Foreign Secretary began attempting to convince the Sicilian government to reverse the agreement. ^[14] Ferdinand II resisted Palmerston's efforts, arguing that both agreements were comparable, and recognising that the new agreement could be highly profitable for his kingdom. The former opinion was supported by contemporary jurists Frederick Pollock and Joseph Phillimore. ^[17] It was further impractical for Ferdinand II to cancel the contract, because if he did Taix and Aycard intended to claim £666,000 in compensation, a price that the kingdom would be hard pressed to pay. ^[14]

"The outcome of this affair is not difficult to foresee: It will end as every quarrel between the powerful and the weak, by the submission of the latter, and Europe will assist in it without being troubled by it.

Albert Wilhelm Laurens Heldwier, Dutch envoy in Turin. ^[18]

On 23 February Ferdinand gave his minister, Prince de Cassaro, permission announce the cancellation of the contract. However, it never happened. ^[19] In mid-March, the British warned that if their wishes were not met, they would establish a blockade and begin seizing merchant ships of the Sicilies. Reasoning that the kingdom's coastline was too large to effectively blockade, Ferdinand II refused to give in. Cassaro resigned from his post in frustration. Ferdinand II then began preparing for war. Palmerston ordered the Mediterranean Fleet to leave Malta and travel to the kingdom. In April, British Admiral Robert Stopford began seizing ships. ^{[19] [20] [21]} Though there was no formal declaration of war, the 'Sulphur War' is generally accepted to have begun in April. Several Neapolitan merchants were searched and detained, but there were no direct naval confrontations between the two nations. ^[22]

Klemens von Metternich, an Austrian diplomat, urged the two parties to avoid all-out war, writing to Sicilian diplomat Marquis de Gagliati: "Marquis, you must agree that it is hardly worth having a European war over a question of sulphur!" He criticised Ferdinand for being unwilling to negotiate. He then tried to convince Ferdinand to cancel the contract. ^[23] In contrast to Metternich's efforts to negotiate, which were rejected, a similar offer by the French prime minister Adolphe Thiers was accepted by the British on 10 April and the Sicilians on 26 April. Also in late April, Stopford released the ships he had been holding and halted further seizures. As negotiations dragged on, Palmerston warned that seizures would resume if the contract was not cancelled by 20 July 1840. Ferdinand cancelled the contract on 21 July. On 29 July Stopford's fleet returned to Malta. ^[24]

In December, British merchants were awarded 121,454 ducats out of the requested 373,978. The French were awarded 44,000 out of the requested 233,433 in 1844. ^[22]

Notes

Notes

1. The Journal of the Statistical Society of London reported that sulphur imports by Great Britain rose from 4,650 tons in 1820 to 44,653, by 1838. Over the same time frame, consumption rose from 5,602 to 33,978 tons. ^[1]

Citations

1. "On the Sulphur Trade of Sicily, and the Commercial Relations between that Country and Great Britain". Journal of the Statistical Society of London. 2 (6): 446–457. 1840. doi:10.2307/2338056. ISSN   0959-5341. JSTOR   2338056.
2. Riall, Lucy (1998). Sicily and the Unification of Italy: Liberal Policy and Local Power, 1859–1866. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19154-261-9 . Retrieved 7 February 2013.
3. "Sulfuric acid". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-01-01.
4. "Sulfuric Acid" (PDF). University of Arizona.
5. Stagner, B. A. (1936). "Fresh Sulfuric Acid From Refinery Acid Sludge". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 28 (2): 171–175. doi:10.1021/ie50314a006. ISSN   0019-7866.
6. "Sulfuric Acid: The Most Important Chemical" (PDF). Cengage.
7. Cunha 2019, p. 279.
8. Thomson 1995, p. 164.
9. Kogel, Jessica Elzea; Trivedi, Nikhil C.; Barker, James M.; Krukowski, Stanley T. (2006). Industrial Minerals & Rocks: Commodities, Markets, and Uses. SME. p. 942. ISBN   978-0-87335-233-8.
10. Ingraham, John L. (2012-05-07). March of the Microbes. Harvard University Press. p. 131. ISBN   978-0-674-05403-5.
11. Šedivý 2011, pp. 1–2.
12. Šedivý 2018, p. 107.
13. Thomson 1995, p. 165.
14. Šedivý 2011, p. 2.
15. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Statistical Society of London. 1842. p. 184.
16. Šedivý 2018, pp. 107–108.
17. Šedivý 2018, pp. 108–109.
18. Šedivý 2016, p. 185.
19. Thomson 1995, p. 173.
20. Thomson 1995, p. 163.
21. Šedivý 2011, p. 4.
22. Thomson 1995, p. 176.
23. Šedivý 2011, pp. 5–6.
24. Šedivý 2011, pp. 10–11.

References

• Cunha, Daniel (2019). "The Frontier of Hell: Sicily, Sulfur, and the Rise of the British Chemical Industry, 1750–1840". Critical Historical Studies. 6 (2): 279–302. doi:10.1086/705370. ISSN   2326-4462. S2CID   213698672.
• Šedivý, Miroslav (2011). "Metternich and the Anglo-Neapolitan Sulphur Crisis of 1840". Journal of Modern Italian Studies. 16 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/1354571X.2011.530754. ISSN   1354-571X. S2CID   145623998.
• Šedivý, Miroslav (2016). Crisis Among the Great Powers: The Concert of Europe and the Eastern Question. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN   978-1-78673-020-6.
• Šedivý, Miroslav (2018). The Decline of the Congress System: Metternich, Italy and European Diplomacy. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN   978-1-78673-403-7.
• Thomson, Dennis W. (1995). "Prelude to the Sulphur War of 1840: The Neapolitan Perspective". European History Quarterly. 25 (2): 163–180. doi:10.1177/026569149502500201. ISSN   0265-6914. S2CID   145807900.

Further reading

• Davis, J. (1982). "Palmerston and the Sicilian Sulphur Crisis of 1840: An Episode in the Imperialism of Free Trade". Risorgimento1 (2): 5–24.
• Sulphur War (1840) : a confrontation between Great Britain and the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies in the Mediterranean (thesis)