Supported decision making

Last updated

Supported decision-making is the idea that people with mental or intellectual disabilities should make decisions about their own lives with the support of a team of people. Supported decision-making is an alternative to the guardianship model, where someone makes decisions for a person. Supported decision-making aims to promote self-determination and independence. [1]

Contents

United Nations

One of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is "Respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one’s own choices, and independence of persons." Article 12 goes into more detail about the rights of people to make their own financial decisions. [2] Some countries that have signed the CRPD still have laws that allow guardianships. Advocates in some countries are working to change the law, including suing the government based on failure to follow the CRPD. [3]

Canada

In addition to Canada being a signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, [4] several Canadian provinces have laws about supported decision-making. For example, British Columbia uses representative agreements, where people with disabilities name a person or group of people they trust, and those people help them make decisions. In very rare cases, the trusted person, known as a representative, is able to make decisions for the person. Yukon and Saskatchewan also have representative agreements. [3]

Sweden

Sweden does not have a guardianship system. In Sweden, a person with a disability must ask the court for a supporter. The court appoints a legal mentor or administrator. A legal mentor can be a friend, family member, or professional supporter and helps the person make decisions. The legal mentor gives advice and can only make decisions if the person is ill. A person with a disability can cancel the arrangement at any time. The court can appoint an administrator with greater financial powers and can make decisions without the person's approval, but this does not mean that all decision-making rights are lost. A person with a disability can still vote. [3]

United Kingdom

In England and Wales, the Mental Capacity Act of 2005 establishes both supported decision-making and guardianship as legal concepts. The act requires that supported decision-making must be tried before any guardianship arrangement. The law also establishes that no action can take away a person's right to vote, marry, have friends and relationships and place a child up for adoption. [3]

United States

In the United States, eighteen states have comprehensive laws about supported decision-making: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin, as well as the District of Columbia, [5] [6] [7] Other states may not have laws specifically about supported decision-making, but may have laws that require alternatives to guardianship whenever possible. Some states, such as Arkansas, have narrower laws addressing supported decision-making in specific contexts, such as in decisions related to organ transplants. [8]

The Autistic Self Advocacy Network, [7] Arc of the United States, [9] the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), [10] and the National Disability Rights Network [11] advocate supported decision-making as an alternative to guardianship. The position of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network is that guardianships deprive people of the right to make choices, of self-determination, and bodily autonomy; people under guardianship are not allowed to make their own decisions about where to live, how to spend their money, and what medical care they receive. Supported decision-making is endorsed by the U.S. Administration for Community Living. [12]

In 2013, Jenny Hatch, a woman with Down syndrome, living in Newport News, Virginia, won the right to make her own decisions using supported decision-making. Hatch was previously under guardianship, where she says she was forced to live in a group home, had her cell phone and laptop taken, and was cut off from her friends. The case was decided in favor of Hatch. With support, she decided to move in with her friends. [13]

Related Research Articles

The disability rights movement is a global social movement that seeks to secure equal opportunities and equal rights for all people with disabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autism rights movement</span> Disability rights movement for autistic people

The autism rights movement, also known as the autistic acceptance movement, is a social movement allied with disability rights that emphasizes a neurodiversity paradigm, viewing autism as a disability with variations in the human brain rather than as a disease to be cured. The movement advocates for several goals, including greater acceptance of autistic traits and behaviors; reforms of services - i.e. services that focus on improving quality of life and well-being instead of suppression and masking of autistic traits that are adaptive or not harmful or imitations of social behaviors of allistic (non-autistic) peers ; the creation of social networks and events that allow autistic people to socialize on their own terms; and the recognition of the autistic community as a minority group.

A legal guardian is a person who has been appointed by a court or otherwise has the legal authority to make decisions relevant to the personal and property interests of another person who is deemed incompetent, called a ward. For example, a legal guardian might be granted the authority to make decisions regarding a ward's housing or medical care or manage the ward's finances. Guardianship is most appropriate when an alleged ward is functionally incapacitated, meaning they have a lagging skill critical to performing certain tasks, such as making important life decisions. Guardianship intends to serve as a safeguard to protect the ward.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Invisible disability</span> Disability that is not immediately noticeable to others

Invisible disabilities, also known as hidden disabilities or non-visible disabilities (NVDs), are disabilities that are not immediately apparent. They are typically chronic illnesses and conditions that significantly impair normal activities of daily living.

The World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry (WNUSP) is an international organisation representing, and led by what it terms "survivors of psychiatry". As of 2003, over 70 national organizations were members of WNUSP, based in 30 countries. The network seeks to protect and develop the human rights, disability rights, dignity and self-determination of those labeled 'mentally ill'.

Self-advocacy is the act of speaking up for oneself and one's interests. It is used as a name for civil rights movements and mutual aid networks for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The term arose in the broader civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, and is part of the disability rights movement. Today there are self-advocacy organizations across the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities</span> Treaty of the United Nations

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is an international human rights treaty of the United Nations intended to protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. Parties to the convention are required to promote, protect, and ensure the full enjoyment of human rights by persons with disabilities and ensure that persons with disabilities enjoy full equality under the law. The Convention serves as a major catalyst in the global disability rights movement enabling a shift from viewing persons with disabilities as objects of charity, medical treatment and social protection towards viewing them as full and equal members of society, with human rights. The convention was the first U.N. human rights treaty of the twenty-first century.

The Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit advocacy organization run by and for individuals on the autism spectrum. ASAN advocates for the inclusion of autistic people in decisions that affect them, including: legislation, depiction in the media, and disability services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mental Disability Advocacy Center</span> Non-governmental organization

The Mental Disability Advocacy Center (MDAC) is an international human rights organisation founded in Hungary in 2002. It is headquartered in Budapest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">People with Disability Australia</span> Australian disability rights and advocacy organisation

People with Disability Australia Ltd (PWDA) is a national Australian disability rights and advocacy organisation founded in 1980 and based in Surry Hills, Sydney.

The Family Movement, also known in the past as the Parent Movement, is an arm of the disability rights movement, a larger social movement. The Family Movement advocates for the economic and social rights of family members with a disability. Key elements include: social inclusion; active participation; a life of meaning; safety; economic security; accessibility and self-determination. The family movement has been critical in closing institutions and other segregated facilities; promoting inclusive education; reforming adult guardianship to the current supported decision-making; increasing access to health care; developing real jobs; fighting stereotypes and reducing discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ari Ne'eman</span> American autism rights advocate

Ari Daniel Ne'eman is an American disability rights activist and researcher who co-founded the Autistic Self Advocacy Network in 2006. On December 16, 2009, President Barack Obama announced that Ne'eman would be appointed to the National Council on Disability. After an anonymous hold was lifted, Ne'eman was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate to serve on the Council on June 22, 2010. He chaired the council's Policy & Program Evaluation Committee making him the first autistic person to serve on the council. In 2015, Ne'eman left the National Council on Disability at the end of his second term. He currently serves as a consultant to the American Civil Liberties Union. As of 2019, he also is a Ph.D. candidate in Health Policy at Harvard University.

Bodily integrity is the inviolability of the physical body and emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy, self-ownership, and self-determination of human beings over their own bodies. In the field of human rights, violation of the bodily integrity of another is regarded as an unethical infringement, intrusive, and possibly criminal.

Dignity of risk is the idea that self-determination and the right to take reasonable risks are essential for dignity and self esteem and so should not be impeded by excessively-cautious caregivers, concerned about their duty of care.

In Japan, a person with a disability is defined as: "a person whose daily life or life in society is substantially limited over the long term due to a physical disability or mental disability". Japan ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 20 January 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lydia X. Z. Brown</span> Autistic disability rights activist

Lydia X. Z. Brown is an American autistic disability rights activist, writer, attorney, and public speaker who was honored by the White House in 2013. They are the chairperson of the American Bar Association Civil Rights & Social Justice Disability Rights Committee. They are also Policy Counsel for Privacy & Data at the Center for Democracy & Technology, and Director of Policy, Advocacy, & External Affairs at the Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network. In 2022, they unsuccessfully ran for the Maryland House of Delegates in District 7A, losing to state delegate Kathy Szeliga and delegate-elect Ryan Nawrocki.

Disability rights are not specifically addressed by legislation in New Zealand. Instead, disability rights are addressed through human rights legislation. Human rights in New Zealand are protected by the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993. New Zealand also signed and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intersex rights in Switzerland</span> Overview of intersex peoples rights in Switzerland

Intersex people in Switzerland have no recognition of rights to physical integrity and bodily autonomy, and no specific protections from discrimination on the basis of sex characteristics. In 2012, the Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics published a report on the medical management of differences of sex development or intersex variations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disability and climate change</span>

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Paris Agreement, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) are connected through their common goals of addressing global challenges and promoting sustainable development through policies and international cooperation.

Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia of 26 October 2021, is the European Court of Human Rights judgment in which the court held that voters' rights were violated when they had no legal right to ask for accessible polling places in advance to achieve accessibility before the election day. The ruling is also significant because the court for the first time extended its jurisdiction to referendums.

References

  1. ↑ "Supported Decision Making". American Bar Association. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  2. ↑ "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) | United Nations Enable". United Nations. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "The Right to Make Choices: New Resource on Supported Decision-Making - Autistic Self Advocacy Network". Autistic Self Advocacy Network. 1 February 2016. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  4. ↑ "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities". United Nations Treaty Collection. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  5. ↑ "US Supported Decision-Making Agreement Laws". Supported Decision-Making. Center for Public Representation.
  6. ↑ Hartnett, Abigail. "Supported Decision-Making and Less Restrictive Alternatives: A Statutory Chart" (PDF). ABA Commission on Law and Aging. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  7. 1 2 "Supported Decision-making: Why the Right to Make Choices With Support Matters - Autistic Self Advocacy Network". Autistic Self Advocacy Network. 25 June 2020. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  8. ↑ "Arkansas | Supported Decision Making". www.supporteddecisionmaking.org.
  9. ↑ "Free Resources on Supported Decision-Making". The Arc. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  10. ↑ "Supported Decision Making & the Problems of Guardianship". American Civil Liberties Union.
  11. ↑ "Self-Determination". NDRN.
  12. ↑ "Supported Decision Making Program". Administration for Community Living.
  13. ↑ "The Justice for Jenny Trial". Jenny Hatch Justice Project.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.