Symphony in White, No. 1: The White Girl

Last updated

Symphony in White, No. 1: The White Girl
Whistler James Symphony in White no 1 (The White Girl) 1862.jpg
Artist James McNeill Whistler
Year1861–62
Medium Oil on canvas
Dimensions215 cm× 108 cm(84.5 in× 42.5 in)
Location National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

Symphony in White, No. 1, also known as The White Girl, is a painting by James McNeill Whistler. The work shows a woman in full figure standing on a dog skin in front of a beige curtain with a lily in her hand. The colour scheme of the painting is almost entirely white. The model is Joanna Hiffernan, the artist's mistress. Though the painting was originally called The White Girl, Whistler later started calling it Symphony in White, No. 1. By referring to his work in such abstract terms, he intended to emphasize his "art for art's sake" philosophy.

Contents

Whistler created the painting in the winter of 1861–62, though he later returned to it and made alterations. It was rejected both at the Royal Academy and at the Salon in Paris, but eventually accepted at the Salon des Refusés in 1863. This exhibition also featured Édouard Manet's famous Déjeuner sur l'herbe , and together the two works gained a lot of attention. The White Girl shows clearly the influence of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, with whom Whistler had recently come in contact. The painting has been interpreted by later art critics both as an allegory of innocence and its loss, and as a religious allusion to the Virgin Mary.

Artist and model

James Abbott McNeill Whistler was born in the United States in 1834, the son of George Washington Whistler, a railway engineer. [1] In 1843, his father relocated the family to Saint Petersburg, Russia, where James received training in painting. [2] After a stay in England, he returned to America to attend the US Military Academy at West Point in 1851. [3] In 1855, he made his way back to Europe, determined to dedicate himself to painting. He settled in Paris at first, but in 1859 moved to London, where he would spend most of the remainder of his life. [4] There he met Dante Gabriel Rossetti and other members of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, who would have a profound influence on Whistler. [5]

It was also in London that Whistler met Joanna Heffernan, the model who would become his lover. Their relationship has been referred to as a "marriage without benefit of clergy." [6] By 1861, Whistler had already used her as a model for another painting. Wapping, named after Wapping in London where Whistler lived, was begun in 1860, though not finished until 1864. [4] It shows a woman and two men on a balcony overlooking the river. According to Whistler himself, the woman –portrayed by Heffernan –was a prostitute. [7] Heffernan supposedly had a strong influence over Whistler; his brother-in-law Francis Seymour Haden refused a dinner invitation in the winter of 1863–64 due to her dominant presence in the household. [8]

Creation and reception

Whistler started working on The White Girl shortly after December 3, 1861, with the intention of submitting it to the prestigious annual exhibition of the Royal Academy. In spite of bouts of illness, he had finished the painting by April. [9] In a letter to George du Maurier in early 1862, he described it as:

Edouard Manet's Le Dejeuner sur l'herbe caused a stir at the 1863 Salon des Refuses, but the attention given to Whistler's White Girl was even greater. Edouard Manet - Luncheon on the Grass - Google Art Project.jpg
Édouard Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe caused a stir at the 1863 Salon des Refusés , but the attention given to Whistler's White Girl was even greater.

...a woman in a beautiful white cambric dress, standing against a window which filters the light through a transparent white muslin curtain – but the figure receives a strong light from the right and therefore the picture, barring the red hair, is one gorgeous mass of brilliant white. [10]

The portrait was created as a simple study in white; however, others saw it differently. The critic Jules-Antoine Castagnary thought the painting an allegory of a new bride's lost innocence. Others linked it to Wilkie Collins's The Woman in White , a popular novel of the time, or various other literary sources. [11] In the painting, Hiffernan holds a lily in her left hand and stands upon a wolf skin rug (interpreted by some to represent masculinity and lust) with the wolf's head staring menacingly at the viewer. [12]

Whistler submitted the painting to the Academy, but according to Heffernan, he expected it to be rejected at this point. [9] The previous year, in 1861, another painting had caused a minor scandal. Edwin Henry Landseer's The Shrew Tamed showed a horse with a woman resting on the ground nearby. The model was named as Ann Gilbert, [13] a noted equestrienne of the period: [14] however it was soon rumoured that it was actually Catherine Walters, the notorious London courtesan. [15] Whistler's painting was reminiscent enough of Landseer's that the judges were wary of admitting it. [16] White Girl was submitted to the Academy along with three etchings, all three of which were accepted, while the painting was not. [17]

Whistler exhibited it at the small Berners Street Gallery in London instead, where it was shown under the title The Woman in White, a reference to the novel of that name by Wilkie Collins, which was a popular success at the time. [10] The book was a tale of romance, intrigue and double identity, and was considered a bit of a sensation at the time of its publication. [18] Du Maurier apparently believed that the painting referred to the novel. The review in the Athenaeum complained that painting did not correspond to the character in the novel, prompting Whistler to write a letter asserting that the gallery chose the title without consulting him, adding "I had no intention whatsoever of illustrating Mr Wilkie Collins' novel. My painting simply represents a girl dressed in white standing in front of a white curtain." [19]

The next year, Whistler tried to have the painting exhibited at the Salon in Paris – the official art exhibition of the Académie des Beaux-Arts – but it was rejected there as well. [20] Instead, it was accepted at the alternative Salon des Refusés – the "exhibition of rejects" that opened on May 15, two weeks after the official Salon. [21]

The 1863 Salon des Refusés was the same exhibition where Édouard Manet's Déjeuner sur l'herbe caused a scandal, yet the attention given to Whistler's White Girl was even greater. [20] The controversy surrounding the paintings was described in Émile Zola's novel L'Œuvre (1886). [9] The reception Whistler's painting received was mostly favourable, however, and largely vindicated him after the rejection he had experienced both in London and in Paris. [22] It was greatly admired by his colleagues and friends Manet, the painter Gustave Courbet and the poet Charles Baudelaire. The art critic Théophile Thoré-Bürger saw it in the tradition of Goya and Velázquez. Lisa Peters summarises that countering criticism by traditionalists, Whistler's supporters insisted that the painting was "an apparition with a spiritual content" and that it epitomized his theory that art should be concerned essentially with the arrangement of colors in harmony, not with a literal portrayal of the natural world. [23] There were, however, those who were less favourable; certain French critics saw the English Pre-Raphaelite trend as somewhat eccentric. [24]

The painting remained in the Whistler family until 1896, when it was sold by the artist's nephew to art collector Harris Whittemore. In 1943, the Whittemore family gave it as a gift to the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. [25]

Composition and interpretation

Whistler, especially in his later career, resented the idea that his paintings should have any meaning beyond what could be seen on the canvas. He is known as a central proponent of the "art for art's sake" philosophy. [26] His comment on The White Girl, denying a connection to Wilkie Collins' novel The Woman in White is one of the earliest of these assertions ("My painting simply represents a girl dressed in white standing in front of a white curtain.") [9] Because English critics saw the painting as an illustration, they tended to be less favourable than their French colleagues, who saw it as a visionary, poetic fantasy. One English critic, referring to Collins' novel, called The White Girl "...one of the most incomplete paintings we ever met with." [10] Since the Berners Street Gallery had used the name The Woman in White for the painting, critics were disappointed with its lack of resemblance to the novel's heroine. [5] Whistler, who had never even read the novel, resented the comparison. [27] About ten years later, he began referring to the painting as Symphony in White, No. 1, [20] though a French critic had called it a Symphonie du blanc already at the time of its exhibition in Paris. [4] By the musical analogy, he further emphasised his philosophy that the composition was the central thing, not the subject matter. [9] The title was probably also inspired by Théophile Gautier's 1852 poem Symphonie en Blanc Majeur . [28]

Whistler James Symphony in White no 2 (The Little White Girl) 1864.jpg
Whistler Symphony in white 3.jpg
Women dressed in white was a theme to which Whistler would return in his Symphony in White, No. 2 and Symphony in White, No. 3 .

Whistler was not entirely content with the realism the painting displayed in its original form, a trait he blamed on the influence Courbet had on him at the time. Later, between 1867 and 1872, he reworked it to give it a more spiritual expression. [4] Even though Symphony was begun before Whistler first met Rossetti, the Pre-Raphaelite influence is still clear. [29] The painting was an early experiment in white on white, with a woman standing in a white dress in front of a white background. This colour scheme was a subject he would return to later, in two paintings that would be given the titles of Symphony in White, No. 2 (1864) and Symphony in White, No. 3 (1865–1867). [20] The panel is long and slender, and the model's pose and the shape of her clothes further emphasise the vertical nature of the painting. [30] The woman is bold, almost confrontational, in her direct gaze at the viewer, and her features are highly individualised. [31] Art critic Hilton Kramer sees in Whistler's portraits a charm and a combination of craft and observational skills that his more radical landscapes lacked. [32]

Though Whistler himself resented attempts to analyse the meaning of his art, this has not deterred later critics from doing so. The 19th-century French art critic Jules-Antoine Castagnary saw in the painting symbols of lost innocence, a theme that has been picked up by later critics. [29] The art historian E. Wayne Craven also sees the painting as more than a formalist exercise, and finds "enigmatic, expressive and even erotic undercurrents" in the image. He points to the contrasts presented by the imagery, with the white lily representing innocence and virginity, and the fierce wolf head on the rug symbolizing the loss of innocence. [20] Beryl Schlossman, coming from the perspective of literary criticism, sees allusions to the Madonna of religious art in the work. To Schlossman, the rug under the woman's feet is the cloud on which the Virgin is often seen standing, and the wolf is the serpent, crushed under her heel. [30]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James McNeill Whistler</span> American painter (1834–1903)

James Abbott McNeill Whistler was an American painter in oils and watercolor, and printmaker, active during the American Gilded Age and based primarily in the United Kingdom. He eschewed sentimentality and moral allusion in painting and was a leading proponent of the credo "art for art's sake".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood</span> Group of English painters, poets and critics, founded in 1848

The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was a group of English painters, poets, and art critics, founded in 1848 by William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Michael Rossetti, James Collinson, Frederic George Stephens and Thomas Woolner who formed a seven-member "Brotherhood" modelled in part on the Nazarene movement. The Brotherhood was only ever a loose association and their principles were shared by other artists of the time, including Ford Madox Brown, Arthur Hughes and Marie Spartali Stillman. Later followers of the principles of the Brotherhood included Edward Burne-Jones, William Morris and John William Waterhouse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salon des Refusés</span> Art exhibition in Paris, first held in 1863

The Salon des Refusés, French for "exhibition of rejects", is generally known as an exhibition of works rejected by the jury of the official Paris Salon, but the term is most famously used to refer to the Salon des Refusés of 1863.

<i>Whistlers Mother</i> 1871 painting by James McNeill Whistler

Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, best known under its colloquial name Whistler's Mother or Portrait of Artist's Mother, is a painting in oils on canvas created by the American-born painter James McNeill Whistler in 1871. The subject of the painting is Whistler's mother, Anna McNeill Whistler. The painting is 56.81 by 63.94 inches, displayed in a frame of Whistler's own design. It is held by the Musée d'Orsay in Paris, having been bought by the French state in 1891. It is one of the most famous works by an American artist outside the United States. It has been variously described as an American icon and a Victorian Mona Lisa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Cooper Gotch</span> English painter

Thomas Cooper Gotch or T. C. Gotch (1854–1931) was an English painter and book illustrator loosely associated with the Pre-Raphaelite movement; he was the brother of John Alfred Gotch, the architect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Atkinson Grimshaw</span> English painter (1836–1893)

John Atkinson Grimshaw was an English Victorian-era artist best known for his nocturnal scenes of urban landscapes. He was called a "remarkable and imaginative painter" by the critic and historian Christopher Wood in Victorian Painting (1999).

<i>The Gentle Art of Making Enemies</i>

The Gentle Art of Making Enemies is a book by the painter James McNeill Whistler, published in London in 1890 by William Heinemann, who also published a second, enlarged edition in 1892. The book was in part a response to, in part a transcript of, Whistler's famous libel suit against critic John Ruskin. Ruskin, in a review of the inaugural showing at the Grosvenor Gallery, had referred to Whistler's painting Nocturne in Black and Gold – The Falling Rocket as "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face". The book contains Whistler's letters to newspapers chronicling his many petty grievances against various acquaintances and friends, and it contains his famous 1885 lecture, "Ten O'Clock", explaining "the meaning and purpose of art".

<i>The Hireling Shepherd</i> Painting by William Holman Hunt

The Hireling Shepherd (1851) is a painting by the Pre-Raphaelite artist William Holman Hunt. It represents a shepherd neglecting his flock in favour of an attractive country girl to whom he shows a death's-head hawkmoth. The meaning of the image has been much debated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Roddam Spencer Stanhope</span> English artist (1829–1908)

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope was an English artist associated with Edward Burne-Jones and George Frederic Watts and often regarded as a second-wave pre-Raphaelite. His work is also studied within the context of Aestheticism and British Symbolism. As a painter, Stanhope worked in oil, watercolor, fresco, tempera, and mixed media. His subject matter was mythological, allegorical, biblical, and contemporary. Stanhope was born in Cawthorne, near Barnsley, Yorkshire, England, and died in Florence, Italy. He was the uncle and teacher of the painter Evelyn De Morgan and encouraged then unknown local artist Abel Hold to exhibit at the Royal Academy, which he did 16 times.

<i>Autumn Leaves</i> (painting) Painting by John Everet Millais

Autumn Leaves (1856) is a painting by John Everett Millais exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1856. It was described by the critic John Ruskin as "the first instance of a perfectly painted twilight." Millais's wife Effie wrote that he had intended to create a picture that was "full of beauty and without a subject".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">J. Comyns Carr</span> British critic

Joseph William Comyns Carr, often referred to as J. Comyns Carr, was an English drama and art critic, gallery director, author, poet, playwright and theatre manager.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joanna Hiffernan</span> Irish artists model and muse

Joanna Hiffernan or Joanna Heffernan was an Irish artists' model and muse who was romantically linked with American painter James Abbott McNeill Whistler and French painter Gustave Courbet. In addition to being an artists' model, Hiffernan herself also drew and painted, although it is not believed she ever exhibited her work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nocturne (painting)</span> Term in painting

In art, a 'nocturne' its broader sense distinguishes paintings of a night scene, or night-piece, such as Rembrandt's The Night Watch, or the German Romantic Caspar David Friedrich's Two Men Contemplating the Moon of 1819.

<i>Symphony in White, No. 2: The Little White Girl</i> Painting by James McNeill Whistler

Symphony in White, No. 2, also known as The Little White Girl is a painting by James McNeill Whistler. The work shows a woman in three-quarter figure standing by a fireplace with a mirror over it. She is holding a fan in her hand, and wearing a white dress. The model is Joanna Hiffernan, the artist's mistress. Though the painting was originally called The Little White Girl, Whistler later started calling it Symphony in White, No. 2. By referring to his work in such abstract terms, he intended to emphasize his "art for art's sake" philosophy. In this painting, Heffernan wears a ring on her ring finger, even though the two were not married. By this religious imagery, Whistler emphasizes the aesthetic philosophy behind his work.

<i>Symphony in White, No. 3</i> Painting by James McNeill Whistler

Symphony in White, No. 3, is a painting by James McNeill Whistler. The work shows two women, one sitting on a sofa dressed in white, and the other resting on the floor, with a yellowish dress. The model on the sofa is Joanna Heffernan, the artist's mistress. By calling the painting Symphony in White, No. 3, Whistler intended to emphasise his artistic philosophy of corresponding arts, inspired by the poet Charles Baudelaire. The presence of a fan on the floor shows the influence of Japonisme, which was a popular artistic trend in European art at the time. Whistler was also greatly influenced by his colleague and friend Albert Joseph Moore, and their works show considerable similarities.

<i>The Princess from the Land of Porcelain</i> Painting by James Abbott McNeill Whistler

Rose and Silver: The Princess from the Land of Porcelain is an oil painting on canvas by American-born artist James McNeill Whistler. It was painted between 1863 and 1865. It currently hangs above the fireplace in The Peacock Room at the Freer Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

<i>Mother of Pearl and Silver: The Andalusian</i> Painting by James Abbott McNeill Whistler

Mother of Pearl and Silver: The Andalusian is a painting by James McNeill Whistler. The work shows a woman in full figure standing with her back to the viewer, with her head in profile. The model is Ethel Whibley, the artist's secretary and sister-in-law.

<i>Lady in White</i> (Toorop)

Lady in White is an impressionist painting of a woman wearing a white robe, from 1886, by Dutch painter Jan Toorop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beatrice Whistler</span> British artist and designer (1857–1896)

Beatrice Whistler was born in Chelsea, London on 12 May 1857. She was the eldest daughter of ten children of the sculptor John Birnie Philip and Frances Black. She studied art in her father's studio and with Edward William Godwin who was an architect-designer. On 4 January 1876 she became the second wife of Edward Godwin. Following the death of Godwin, Beatrice married James McNeill Whistler on 11 August 1888.

Rosalind Birnie Philip was the sister-in-law of James McNeill Whistler. After the death of her sister Beatrice in 1896 Rosalind acted as secretary to Whistler and was appointed Whistler's sole beneficiary and the executrix in his will.

References

  1. ↑ Anderson & Koval (1994), pp. 3–6.
  2. ↑ Weintraub (1974), pp. 6–9.
  3. ↑ Anderson & Koval (1994), pp. 26–31.
  4. 1 2 3 4 MacDonald (1999).
  5. 1 2 Spencer (2004)
  6. ↑ Weintraub (1974), p. 71.
  7. ↑ Spencer (1998), p. 306.
  8. ↑ Spencer (1998), p. 309.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Spencer (1998), p. 300.
  10. 1 2 3 Taylor (1978), p. 27.
  11. ↑ Anderson & Koval (1994), pp. 106, 119.
  12. ↑ "Explanation of Whistler's purpose in making the painting Symphony in White". Dia.org. Archived from the original on September 5, 2013. Retrieved July 15, 2013.
  13. ↑ The Times, Saturday, May 4, 1861; p. 12; Issue 23924; col A.
  14. ↑ She offered her professional services to render ladies' horses "quiet, safe and pleasant to ride":The Times, Friday, Jun 20, 1856; p. 2; Issue 22399; col A.
  15. ↑ Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Vol. 90 (550) Aug 1861 Page 211:'"The Shrew Tamed" - a high-bred horse of soft silken coat, dappled with play of light and shade as on velvet, subdued by a "pretty horsebreaker", is certainly unfortunate as a subject. This picture has been made the more notorious by "The Belgravian Lament", which took the well-known rider as a text whereon to point a moral. We hope it will now be felt by Sir Edwin Landseer and his friends that the intrusion of "pretty horsebreakers" on the walls of the Academy is not less to be regretted than their presence in Rotten Row.'
  16. ↑ Spencer (1998), p. 310.
  17. ↑ Anderson & Koval (1994), pp. 129–130.
  18. ↑ Spencer (1998), p. 302.
  19. ↑ Spencer, (1998) p. 305.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 Craven (2003), pp. 342–3.
  21. ↑ Weintraub (1974), p. 84.
  22. ↑ Newton & MacDonald (1978), p. 151.
  23. ↑ Peters, Lisa N. (1996). James McNeil Whistler. New York, NY: Smithmark. p. 17. ISBN   978-0-7651-9961-4. OCLC   36587931.
  24. ↑ Spencer (1998), p. 308.
  25. ↑ "Symphony in White, No. 1: The White Girl - Provenance". National Gallery of Art. Archived from the original on May 8, 2009. Retrieved July 2, 2010.
  26. ↑ Batchelor (2002), p. 219.
  27. ↑ Weintraub (1974), pp. 76–7.
  28. ↑ Weintraub (1974), p. 72.
  29. 1 2 Taylor (1978), p. 29.
  30. 1 2 Schlossman (1999), p. 195.
  31. ↑ Spencer (1998), p. 307.
  32. ↑ Kramer (1974), pp. 72–3.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.