Taxonomy of diatoms

Last updated
Light microscopy of several species of living freshwater diatoms Diatomeas w.jpg
Light microscopy of several species of living freshwater diatoms

Diatoms belong to a large group called the heterokonts, which include both autotrophs such as golden algae and kelp; and heterotrophs such as water moulds. The classification of heterokonts is still unsettled: they may be designated a division, phylum, kingdom, or something intermediate to those. Consequently, diatoms are ranked anywhere from a class, usually called Diatomophyceae or Bacillariophyceae, to a division (=phylum), usually called Bacillariophyta, with corresponding changes in the ranks of their subgroups.

Contents

Genera and species

An estimated 20,000 extant diatom species are believed to exist, of which around 12,000 have been named to date according to Guiry, 2012 [1] (other sources give a wider range of estimates [2] [3] [4] [5] ). Around 1,000-1,300 diatom genera have been described, both extant and fossil, [6] [7] of which some 250-300 exist only as fossils. [8]

Classes and orders

Overview

For many years the diatoms—treated either as a class (Bacillariophyceae) or a phylum (Bacillariophyta)—were divided into just 2 orders, corresponding to the centric and the pennate diatoms (Centrales and Pennales; alternative names Biddulphiales and Bacillariales, as used e.g. in Lee, 1989). [9] This classification was extensively overhauled by Round, Crawford and Mann in 1990 who treated the diatoms at a higher rank (division, corresponding to phylum in zoological classification), and promoted the major classification units to classes, maintaining the centric diatoms as a single class Coscinodiscophyceae, but splitting the former pennate diatoms into 2 separate classes, Fragilariophyceae and Bacillariophyceae (the latter older name retained but with an emended definition), between them encompassing 45 orders, the majority of them new.

Today (writing at mid 2020) it is recognised that the 1990 system of Round et al. is in need of revision with the advent of newer molecular work, however the best system to replace it is unclear, and current systems in widespread use such as AlgaeBase, the World Register of Marine Species and its contributing database DiatomBase, and the system for "all life" represented in Ruggiero et al., 2015, all retain the Round et al. treatment as their basis, albeit with diatoms as a whole treated as a class rather than division/phylum, and Round et al.'s classes reduced to subclasses, for better agreement with the treatment of phylogenetically adjacent groups and their containing taxa. (For references refer the individual sections below).

One proposal, by Linda Medlin and co-workers commencing in 2004, is for some of the centric diatom orders considered more closely related to the pennates to be split off as a new class, Mediophyceae, itself more closely aligned with the pennate diatoms than the remaining centrics. This hypothesis—later designated the Coscinodiscophyceae-Mediophyceae-Bacillariophyceae, or Coscinodiscophyceae+(Mediophyceae+Bacillariophyceae) (CMB) hypothesis—has been accepted by D.G. Mann among others, who uses it as the basis for the classification of diatoms as presented in Adl. et al.'s series of syntheses (2005, 2012, 2019), and also in the Bacillariophyta chapter of the 2017 Handbook of the Protists edited by Archibald et al., with some modifications reflecting the apparent non-monophyly of Medlin et al. original "Coscinodiscophyceae". Meanwhile, a group led by E.C. Theriot favours a different hypothesis of phylogeny, which has been termed the structural gradation hypothesis (SGH) and does not recognise the Mediophyceae as a monophyletic group, while another analysis, that of Parks et al., 2018, finds that the radial centric diatoms (Medlin et al.'s Coscinodiscophyceae) are not monophyletic, but supports the monophyly of Mediophyceae minus Attheya , which is an anomalous genus. Discussion of the relative merits of these conflicting schemes continues by the various parties involved. [10] [11] [12] [13]

Round et al., 1990

Based on the fact that pennate diatoms either do or do not have a longitudinal groove in the valve, called a raphe, [14] a 1990 classification by Round, Crawford & Mann [3] divides the diatoms (as Bacillarophyta) into three classes, centric (22 orders); pennate without a raphe (12 orders); and pennate with a raphe (11 orders), as follows: [15]

Coscinodiscophyceae Isthmia nervosaIsthmia nervosa Diatom - Isthmia nervosa - 400x (16237138292).jpg
Coscinodiscophyceae
Isthmia nervosaIsthmia nervosa
Coscinodiscophyceae Odontella aurita Odontella aurita cells.jpg
Coscinodiscophyceae
Odontella aurita
Thalassiosirales Stephanodiscus hantzschii "Diatoms cake". Typical diatom species - Stephanodiscus hantzschii Grunow in Cleve & Grunow.JPG
Thalassiosirales
Stephanodiscus hantzschii
Fragilaria through the microscope Flagilaria.png
Fragilaria through the microscope
  • Subclass Biddulphiophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Chaetocerotophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Corethrophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Coscinodiscophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Cymatosirophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Lithodesmiophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Rhizosoleniophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Thalassiosirophycidae Round & R.M.Crawford
  • Subclass Fragilariophycidae Round
  • Class Bacillariophyceae Haeckel, 1878, emend. D.G.Mann (pennate diatoms with a raphe (raphids))
  • Subclass Bacillariophycidae D.G.Mann
  • Subclass Eunotiophycidae D.G.Mann

Medlin & Kaczmarska, 2004

An alternate classification for the diatoms based on molecular phylogeny was proposed by Medlin & Kaczmarska in 2004, as follows. [16] Medlin and co-workers erected a new class, Mediophyceae (which could be re-ranked a subclass if diatoms as a whole are ranked as a class rather than a phylum) for the "polar centric" diatoms, which they consider to be more closely related to the pennate rather than to other centric diatoms, a concept which has been followed or further adapted by some (e.g. Adl et al., 2019, see below), but not all subsequent workers at this time.

  • Subphylum Coscinodiscophytina
  • Subphylum Bacillariophytina

Ruggiero et al., 2015

In the treatment for "all life" (down to order, extant taxa only) by Ruggiero et al., 2015, [17] the diatoms are treated as follows. This treatment largely reflects that used by Algaebase as at 2015, and is also reflected in the current (mid 2020) treatment used in DiatomBase, the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) of which DiatomBase is a part, and the Catalogue of Life. This treatment is identical to that of Round et al., 1990, except that all diatoms are treated as a single class, Round et al.'s classes are reduced to subclasses, and the latter's original subclasses are omitted.

  • Class Bacillariophyceae (diatoms)
  • Subclass Bacillariophycidae
  • Subclass Coscinodiscophycidae
  • Subclass Fragilariophycidae

Adl et al., 2019

Following earlier versions in the treatments of Adl et al. 2005 and 2012, [18] [19] D.G. Mann, in Adl et al. 2019, [20] presented his most recent classification of diatoms as follows, while noting: "This revision reflects numerous advances in the phylogeny of the diatoms over the last decade. Due to our poor taxon sampling outside of the Mediophyceae and pennate diatoms, and the known and anticipated diversity of all diatoms, many clades appear at a high classification level (and the higher level classification is rather flat)." This classification treats diatoms as a phylum (Diatomeae/Bacillariophyta), accepts the class Mediophyceae of Medlin and co-workers, introduces new subphyla and classes for a number of otherwise isolated genera, and re-ranks a number of previously established taxa as subclasses, but does not list orders or families. Inferred ranks have been added for clarity (Adl. et al. do not use ranks, but the intended ones in this portion of the classification are apparent from the choice of endings used, within the system of botanical nomenclature employed).

  • Subphylum Leptocylindrophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019
  • Class Mediophyceae Jouse & Proshkina-Lavrenko in Medlin & Kaczmarska 2004
  • Subclass Chaetocerotophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990, emend.
  • Subclass Lithodesmiophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990, emend.
  • Subclass Thalassiosirophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990
  • Subclass Cymatosirophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990
  • Subclass Odontellophycidae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019
  • Subclass Chrysanthemodiscophycidae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019
  • Subclass Biddulphiophycidae Round and R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990, emend.
  • Biddulphiophyceae incertae sedis ( Attheya )
  • Bacillariophyceae incertae sedis (Striatellaceae)
  • Subclass Urneidophycidae Medlin 2016
  • Subclass Fragilariophycidae Round in Round, Crawford & Mann 1990, emend.
  • Subclass Bacillariophycidae D.G. Mann in Round, Crawford & Mann 1990, emend.

Others

Another systematic approach to classification was proposed in 1995, the Hoek, Mann and Jahns system. [21] Previous versions of the Adl et al., 2019 classification appeared in Adl et al. 2005 and Adl et al. 2012, [18] [19] also in the chapter "Bacillariophyta" by Mann, Crawford & Round in the 2017 Handbook of the Protists edited by Archibald et al., [22] in which some groups later named as formal taxa are listed under informal names (leptocylindrids, corethrids, melosirids, etc.).

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euglenozoa</span> Phylum of protozoans

Euglenozoa are a large group of flagellate Discoba. They include a variety of common free-living species, as well as a few important parasites, some of which infect humans. Euglenozoa are represented by four major groups, i.e., Kinetoplastea, Diplonemea, Euglenida, and Symbiontida. Euglenozoa are unicellular, mostly around 15–40 μm (0.00059–0.00157 in) in size, although some euglenids get up to 500 μm (0.020 in) long.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diatom</span> Class of microalgae found in oceans, waterways, and soil

A diatom is any member of a large group comprising several genera of algae, specifically microalgae, found in the oceans, waterways and soils of the world. Living diatoms make up a significant portion of the Earth's biomass: they generate about 20 to 50 percent of the oxygen produced on the planet each year, take in over 6.7 billion tonnes of silicon each year from the waters in which they live, and constitute nearly half of the organic material found in the oceans. The shells of dead diatoms can reach as much as a half-mile deep on the ocean floor, and the entire Amazon basin is fertilized annually by 27 million tons of diatom shell dust transported by transatlantic winds from the African Sahara, much of it from the Bodélé Depression, which was once made up of a system of fresh-water lakes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haptophyte</span> Type of algae

The haptophytes, classified either as the Haptophyta, Haptophytina or Prymnesiophyta, are a clade of algae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amoebozoa</span> Phylum of protozoans

Amoebozoa is a major taxonomic group containing about 2,400 described species of amoeboid protists, often possessing blunt, fingerlike, lobose pseudopods and tubular mitochondrial cristae. In traditional classification schemes, Amoebozoa is usually ranked as a phylum within either the kingdom Protista or the kingdom Protozoa. In the classification favored by the International Society of Protistologists, it is retained as an unranked "supergroup" within Eukaryota. Molecular genetic analysis supports Amoebozoa as a monophyletic clade. Modern studies of eukaryotic phylogenetic trees identify it as the sister group to Opisthokonta, another major clade which contains both fungi and animals as well as several other clades comprising some 300 species of unicellular eukaryotes. Amoebozoa and Opisthokonta are sometimes grouped together in a high-level taxon, named Amorphea. Amoebozoa includes many of the best-known amoeboid organisms, such as Chaos, Entamoeba, Pelomyxa and the genus Amoeba itself. Species of Amoebozoa may be either shelled (testate) or naked, and cells may possess flagella. Free-living species are common in both salt and freshwater as well as soil, moss and leaf litter. Some live as parasites or symbionts of other organisms, and some are known to cause disease in humans and other organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yellow-green algae</span> Class of algae

Yellow-green algae or the Xanthophyceae (xanthophytes) are an important group of heterokont algae. Most live in fresh water, but some are found in marine and soil habitats. They vary from single-celled flagellates to simple colonial and filamentous forms. Xanthophyte chloroplasts contain the photosynthetic pigments chlorophyll a, chlorophyll c, β-carotene, and the carotenoid diadinoxanthin. Unlike other Stramenopiles (heterokonts), their chloroplasts do not contain fucoxanthin, which accounts for their lighter colour. Their storage polysaccharide is chrysolaminarin. Xanthophyte cell walls are produced of cellulose and hemicellulose. They appear to be the closest relatives of the brown algae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monadofilosa</span> Group of protists

Monadofilosa is a grouping of Cercozoa. These organisms are single-celled amoeboid protists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pennales</span> An order of bilaterally symmetrical diatoms

The order Pennales is a traditional subdivision of the heterokont algae known as diatoms. The order is named for the shape of the cell walls of pennate diatoms, which are elongated in valve view. The valves may be linear or oval in shape, and usually bear bilaterally symmetrical ornamental patterns. These patterns are composed of a series of transverse lines that can appear as rows of dots when viewed with an optical microscope. Some pennate diatoms also exhibit a fissure along their longitudinal axis. This is known as a raphe, and is involved in gliding movements made by diatom cells; motile diatoms always possess a raphe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coscinodiscophyceae</span> Class of diatoms

The Coscinodiscophyceae are a class(s) of diatoms. They are similar to the Centrales, a traditional, paraphyletic subdivision of the heterokont algae known as diatoms. The order is named for the shape of the cell walls of centric diatoms, which are circular or ellipsoid in valve view. The valves often bear radially symmetrical ornamental patterns that can appear as dots when viewed with an optical microscope. Some also bear spines on their valves, which may either increase cell surface area and reduce sinking, or act as a deterrent to zooplankton grazers. Unlike pennate diatoms, centric diatoms never have a raphe.

Auxospores are specialised cells in diatoms that are produced at key stages in their cell cycle or life history. Auxospores typically play a role in growth processes, sexual reproduction or dormancy.

<i>Attheya</i> Genus of single-celled organisms

Attheya is a genus of small single celled diatoms. Some of these species were earlier regarded to belong to Chaetoceros, or to Gonioceros, the taxonomic status of some of these species are still debated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ochrophyte</span> Phylum of algae

Ochrophytes, also known as heterokontophytes or stramenochromes, are a group of algae. They are the photosynthetic stramenopiles, a group of eukaryotes, organisms with a cell nucleus, characterized by the presence of two unequal flagella, one of which has tripartite hairs called mastigonemes. In particular, they are characterized by photosynthetic organelles or plastids enclosed by four membranes, with membrane-bound compartments called thylakoids organized in piles of three, chlorophyll a and c as their photosynthetic pigments, and additional pigments such as β-carotene and xanthophylls. Ochrophytes are one of the most diverse lineages of eukaryotes, containing ecologically important algae such as brown algae and diatoms. They are classified either as phylum Ochrophyta or Heterokontophyta, or as subphylum Ochrophytina within phylum Gyrista. Their plastids are of red algal origin.

Craticula is a genus of diatom that lies on or in the top layers of sediments in the freshwater to brackish water environments it inhabits. In addition to frustule morphology the genus differs from closely related species by its sexual reproduction and movement in response to light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eupodiscaceae</span> Family of single-celled organisms

Eupodiscaceae is a diatom family (Bacillariophyceae) present both in marine and freshwater habitats Odontella is the only genera in this family with typical marine species. However, Round et al. (1990) placed Odontella in Triceratiaceae (Schutt) Lemmermann, order Triceratiales Round and Crawford, subclass Biddulphiophycidae Round and Crawford. The taxonomic status of this family is unclear and disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opalozoa</span> Subphylum of protists

Opalozoa is a subphylum of heterotrophic protists of the phylum Bigyra, and is the sister group to Sagenista. Opalozoans are non-photosynthetic heterokonts that are ancestrally phagotrophic but many times have evolved to be osmotrophic saprotrophs in the gut of vertebrate animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarcomonadea</span> Class of flagellate protists

The sarcomonads or class Sarcomonadea are a group of amoeboid biciliate protists in the phylum Cercozoa. They are characterized by a propensity to move through gliding on their posterior cilium or through filopodia, a lack of scales or external theca, a soft cell surface without obvious cortical filamentous or membranous skeleton, two cilia without scales or hairs, tubular mitochondrial cristae, near-spherical extrusomes, and a microbody attached to the nucleus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxonomy of Protista</span> Classification of eukaryotes

A protist is any eukaryotic organism that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. The protists do not form a natural group, or clade, since they exclude certain eukaryotes with whom they share a common ancestor; but, like algae or invertebrates, the grouping is used for convenience. In some systems of biological classification, such as the popular five-kingdom scheme proposed by Robert Whittaker in 1969, the protists make up a kingdom called Protista, composed of "organisms which are unicellular or unicellular-colonial and which form no tissues". In the 21st century, the classification shifted toward a two-kingdom system of protists: Chromista and Protozoa.

Skeletonema grethae is a species of diatom. Together with S. pseudocostatum, S. tropicum, and S. japonicum, it possesses external processes of its fultoportulae that have narrow tips which connect with those of sibling cells via fork-, knot-, or knuckle-like unions.

Skeletonema japonicum is a diatom. Together with S. pseudocostatum, S. tropicum, and S. grethae, it possesses external processes of its fultoportulae that have narrow tips which connect with those of sibling cells via fork-, knot-, or knuckle-like unions.

Linda Karen Medlin is a molecular biologist known for her work on diatoms. She is an elected member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gyrista</span> Phylum of eukaryotic organisms

Gyrista is a phylum of heterokont protists containing three diverse groups: the mostly photosynthetic Ochrophyta, the parasitic Pseudofungi, and the recently described group of nanoflagellates known as Bigyromonada. Members of this phylum are characterized by the presence of a helix or a double helix/ring system in the ciliary transition region.

References

  1. ↑ Guiry, M.D. (2012). "How many species of algae are there?". Journal of Phycology. 48 (5): 1057–1063. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x. PMID   27011267. S2CID   30911529.
  2. ↑ Grethe R. Hasle; Erik E. Syvertsen; Karen A. Steidinger; Karl Tangen (25 January 1996). "Marine Diatoms". In Carmelo R. Tomas (ed.). Identifying Marine Diatoms and Dinoflagellates. Academic Press. pp. 5–385. ISBN   978-0-08-053441-1 . Retrieved 13 November 2013.
  3. 1 2 Frank Eric Round; R. M. Crawford; D. G. Mann (1990). The Diatoms: Biology & Morphology of the Genera. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-36318-1 . Retrieved 13 November 2013.[ page needed ]
  4. ↑ Canter-Lund, H. and Lund, J.W.G. (1995). Freshwater Algae: Their microscopic world explained, Biopress Limited. ISBN   0-948737-25-5.[ page needed ]
  5. ↑ Mann, David G. (2005). "The species concept in diatoms: Evidence for morphologically distinct, sympatric gamodemes in four epipelic species". Plant Systematics and Evolution. 164 (1/4): 215–37. doi:10.1007/BF00940439. JSTOR   23675282. S2CID   37684109.
  6. ↑ Fourtanier, Elisabeth; Kociolek, J. Patrick (1999). "Catalogue of the Diatom Genera". Diatom Research. 14 (1): 1–190. doi:10.1080/0269249X.1999.9705462.
  7. ↑ The World Register of Marine Species lists 1,356 diatom genus names from all habitats as at July 2020, of which 1,248 are "accepted".
  8. ↑ Queries to the World Register of Marine Species, July 2020, return 299 "fossil only" genus names, of which 285 are "accepted".
  9. ↑ Lee, Robert Edward (1989). Phycology, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 645. ISBN   0521365023.
  10. ↑ Theriot, Edward C.; Cannone, Jamie J.; Gutell, Robin R.; Alverson, Andrew J. (2009). "The limits of nuclear-encoded SSU rDNA for resolving the diatom phylogeny". European Journal of Phycology. 4 (3): 277–290. doi:10.5091/plecevo.2010.418. PMC   2835975 . PMID   20224747.
  11. ↑ Theriot, Edward C.; Ashworth, Matt; Ruck, Elizabeth; Nakov, Teofil; Jansen, Robert K. (2010). "A preliminary multigene phylogeny of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta): challenges for future research". Plant Ecology and Evolution. 143 (3): 277–290. doi: 10.1080/09670260902749159 . PMC   2835975 . PMID   20224747.
  12. ↑ Parks, Matthew B.; Wickett, Norman J.; Alverson, Andrew J. (2018). "Signal, uncertainty, and conflict in phylogenomic data for a diverse lineage of microbial eukaryotes (Diatoms, Bacillariophyta)". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 35 (1): 80–93. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx268 . PMC   5850769 . PMID   29040712.
  13. ↑ Medlin, L.K.; Desdevises, Y. (2020). "Review of the phylogenetic reconstruction of the diatoms using molecular tools with an analysis of a seven gene data set using multiple outgroups and morphological data for a total evidence approach" (PDF). Phycologia. in press.
  14. ↑ O.E.D. 2nd edition 2005
  15. ↑ "Bacillariophyceae". algaebase. M. D. Guiry. Retrieved 11 November 2013.
  16. ↑ Medlin, Linda K.; Kaczmarska, Irena (2004). "Evolution of the diatoms: V. Morphological and cytological support for the major clades and a taxonomic revision" (PDF). Phycologia. 43 (3): 245–270. doi:10.2216/i0031-8884-43-3-245.1. S2CID   83631828.
  17. ↑ Ruggiero; et al. (2015), "Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms", PLOS ONE, 10 (4): e0119248, Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019248R, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119248 , PMC   4418965 , PMID   25923521
  18. 1 2 Adl SM, Simpson AG, Farmer MA, Andersen RA, Anderson OR, Barta JR, Bowser SS, Brugerolle G, Fensome RA, Fredericq S, James TY, Karpov S, Kugrens P, Krug J, Lane CE, Lewis LA, Lodge J, Lynn DH, Mann DG, McCourt RM, Mendoza L, Moestrup O, Mozley-Standridge SE, Nerad TA, Shearer CA, Smirnov AV, Spiegel FW, Taylor MF (2005). "The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 52 (5): 399–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x . PMID   16248873.
  19. 1 2 Adl SM, Simpson AG, Lane CE, Lukeš J, Bass D, Bowser SS, Brown MW, Burki F, Dunthorn M, Hampl V, Heiss A, Hoppenrath M, Lara E, Le Gall L, Lynn DH, McManus H, Mitchell EA, Mozley-Stanridge SE, Parfrey LW, Pawlowski J, Rueckert S, Shadwick L, Shadwick L, Schoch CL, Smirnov A, Spiegel FW (September 2012). "The revised classification of eukaryotes". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 59 (5): 429–493. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. PMC   3483872 . PMID   23020233.
  20. ↑ Adl, Sina M.; Bass, David; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Schoch, Conrad L.; Smirnov, Alexey; Agatha, Sabine; Berney, Cedric; Brown, Matthew W. (2018-09-26). "Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 66 (1): 4–119. doi:10.1111/jeu.12691. PMC   6492006 . PMID   30257078.
  21. ↑ Christiaan Van Den Hoek; D. G. Mann; H. M. Jahns (1995). Algae: An Introduction to Phycology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-31687-3 . Retrieved 13 November 2013.[ page needed ]
  22. ↑ Mann, David G.; Crawford, Richard M.; Round, Frank E. (2017). "Bacillariophyta" (PDF). In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32669-6_29-1. ISBN   9783319281476.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.