Tima language

Last updated

Tima is one of the two languages in the Katla language family. It is spoken by the Tima people in Central Sudan.

Contents

Tima
Lomorik, Tamanik, Yibwa
Di-murik
Native to Sudan
Region Nuba Hills, Southern Kordofan
Ethnicity5,000 Tima (2007) [1]
Native speakers
3,300 (2000) [2]
Unwritten
Language codes
ISO 639-3 tms
Glottolog tima1241
ELP Tima
Lang Status 40-SE.svg
Tima is classified as Severely Endangered by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger

Language Name [3]

The name of the language originates from one of the village's names in which Tima is spoken: tɨmmʌ. It is often used by people who live near to but are not part of the Tima-community and in linguistic contexts. From what is known about this name, there is no negative connotation to it.

While the name 'Tima' is often used, the native speakers refer to Tima as 'du-murik'.

Other names used for this language are Lomorik, Tamanik and Yibwa.

Native Speakers [4]

Tima is spoken mainly in a few villages in Central Sudan, in an area somewhere between the towns Katla and Lagawa, around the Jebel Hill in the Nuba Mountains. This area is said to have the most native speakers with around four-fifth of all Tima-speakers, though it is difficult to say if this given location is still completely accurate to this day. Native speakers call their living area 'lu-murik' and themselves 'i-murik' in plural form or 'ko-murik' in singular form.

Word structure [5]

Tima words are composed of multiple affixes. Noun-prefixes are used as an indicater of the according noun-classes and the quantity of the noun.

There is also a high number of suffixes which for example act as certain verb extensions.

Locative nouns [6]

Locative nouns (that are only used in singular forms here) use the Prefix 'li-'. This prefix indicades a location and is used for locatives nouns as well as for names of places.

As seen above, there are two different allomorphs possible for the prefix. The 'li-' prefix is the base form and the 'I-' is second form.

The base form only attaches to nominal roots that start with a consonant.

The second form is only attached to nominal roots that start with a vowel. Here the prefix vowel '-i-' disappears before the prefix is attached to the nominal root.  

To indicate a location 'li-' can also attach to prepositions.

With the same purpose 'li-' can also attach to the third person singular and plural. It is known, that in spoken Tima this results in the expression: 'l(i)-yʌŋ' which means 'there is/are'.

There is also the proclitic locative marker 'ɪ-/i', which  is used fro another set of locative nouns. It is used for singular and plural nouns and is found in different types of Tima noun classes and stands before the singular or plural prefixes in the word structure. It considered to be a major locative marker.

[7]
singularplural
'i-kuh''i- yuh'=in the bone/s
'ɪ-dɘla''ɪ-ɪdɘla'=on the roofs

Another irregularity are locative markers with body part nouns. The locative marker 'i-' still exists, but additionally their numeral class prefix changes. The usual singular class prefix is replaced by the morpheme 'yV' and the usual plural prefix is replaced by the marker 'i-'.

This rules has several exceptions for example, nouns from the noun class 'c-' use the locative marker but keep their singular class prefix. But in plural they use the locative marker and change the plural marker from 'i-' to 'y-' to avoid using this vowel so often in a row.

singularplural
'ɪ-c-ɪɪ''ɪ-y-ɪɪ'=in the eye/s

Other exceptions are body part nouns that belong to the 'ku-' singular class, some don't undergo any changes and others drop the locativ prefix 'i-' entirely.

To express the meaning of a location, the locative marker '(n)tV-' is used. In this case the marker differs depending on where the speaker is with regard to the location mentioned. Witch the use of this locative marker these nouns can undergo some morphonological changes.

Tense [8]

Tima tenses fundamentally consists off of a non-future tense and a future tense. That is because Tima speakers mostly distinguish events by whether they already took place or if they will take place after the moment of speech.

Future Tense

Grammatically, the future tense has to be marked with a 'dV-' morpheme. The 'V' in this case stands for an underspecified vowel, which changes depending on the individual subject marker of the verb.

Furthermore, Tima distinguishes between definite future (recent future) and indefinite future (remote future). You can tell which one of the two is used, by looking at which subject person marker is used, which is located in the verb structure right before the future tense marker.

Indefinite Future Tense

The indefinite future is used, when you want to say that an action will take place, but you do not know when yet. Grammatically this tense is marked with the usual futur/e tense morpheme 'dV-' plus an aspect marker 'cV-'.

TimaTranslation
1SGcɛ-n-dɛ-n- n-mɔɔk-dʌ iidiI will drink water
2SGca-da- mɔɔk-ŋaŋ iidiyou will drink water
3SGpɨnʌ cɘ-n-dɘ-n-məok iidihe/she will drink water
1PL.INCLcɛ-di-mɔɔk-neey iidiwe will drink water
1PL.EXCLcɛ-di-mɔɔk -nin iidiwe will drink water
2PLca-da-na-mɔɔk-nan iidiyou will drink water
3PLihinʌ cɘ-n-dɘ-n- mɔɔk iidi  they will drink water

[9]

When expressing something for the indefinite future, another combination of markers that is used are the imperfective aspect marker 'e-' plus the future marker 'dV-'. This first marker is only used for the indefinite future tense.

1SG     'e-dɛ-n-diik-dʌ'      =I will go

To emphasise the fact that indefinite future is in use, it is not unusual that adverbials are added.

E.g.      'anako'      =later on/in the future

Definite Future Tense

The definite future is used, when said action will definitely take place shortly after the time of speech.

The usual future marker 'dV-' is used on the verb here, but unlike for the indefinite future, the imperfect aspect marker 'c-' is not used.

It is also possible to use the present tense when speaking of an action that will take place in the definite future. The context of the statement is very important in this case because it will explain that the definite future is meant, even if the present tense is used. In this case the future tense morpheme is no longer used. In order to highlight the habitual aspect, the adverb 'ʈɔʈɔk' can be added.

To emphasise the fact that definite future is in use, it is not unusual that adverbials are added.

E.g.
'batɪn'      = coming next
'kʊhʊnaŋ'      = now/just

There are also more variants of the definite future if it is used together with a specific mood category.

Non-Future Tense

This tense is generally used for all situations which are not in the future, i.e. events that took place in the past, general events or ongoing events.

If you compare future and non-future verbs, there is no explicit marker for the non-future tense where the future marker 'dV-' would be, but instead there are subject markers to use on verbs, which differ for each non-future tense.

Past Tense

As said above, the Past tense is morphologically unmarked and can only be distinguished from other tenses by the subject marker. There is a proclitic marker though, which fuses with the person marker in the verb, which indicates the past tense:

SG ‘a-‘
PL ‘i-‘

This results in a morpheme which holds information both about the tense and the subject.

There is a differentiation between Recent Past and Remote Past, which will be elaborated below.

Recent Past

The Recent Past is a tense, used if said past event still somehow connects to the present time. To mark this tense, the past proclitic markers 'a-' (sg.) and 'i-' (pl.) are fused with a certain subject marker. The past marker hereby proceeds the person marker:

separate morphemesportmanteau morpheme
1SGa+iŋɛŋ
2SGa+aaa
3SGa+ŋ
1PL.INCLa+iɛɛ
1PL.EXCLa+iɛɛ
2PLa iɛ
3PLa ŋ

[10]

Which results in sentences like this, e.g.:

2SG     'aa-kumun-ŋaŋ'      =you found it

To emphasize the connection between past and present time in this tense, either adverbs are frequently used or a certain aspect marker '-ataŋ' is added at the end of the verb-root.

Remote Past

The Remote Past or General past describes an action that took place a long time ago from the moment of speech. As in the recent past, the past tense proclitic marker is also fused with a subject marker but with a different one than for the recent past.

Depending on the sentence structure, the 1sg subject proclitic marker either is 'uŋ-' (SVO) or 'iŋ-' (OSV).

Other irregularities exist in combination with the ergative case. Here the person marker 'nʌ' is used, but can change depending on the verb and its consonant at the beginning of the verb root.

Present Tense

This tense is used for describing an action that is happening during the moment of speech, i.e. for describing something progressive or habitual.

The progressive ‘cV-‘ marker is used here, but its form is dependent on the subject markers of each verb. This results in sentence being both interpretable as progressive or habitual.

For describing a procedure or express a generic sentence, the progressive marker falls away completely and only subject marker and verb-root are being used.

Numerals [11]

The counting system in Tima language works with two different bound prefixes.

An exception to this system is the number 1. It is marked by the prefix 'a-/ʌ-'.

For the numbers 2 to 10 the prefix 'ɪ-/i-' is used and it markes the singularity of those numbers.

The following numbers from 11 to 19 have there names from a combination of the names from the numbers 1 to 9 plus the prefix 't̪a-'. This most likely works as an indication that the number is „from 10 onward“ or just works as a „plus“.

[12]
base numeral+10 × 10
1a-tɪɪn11ta-tɪɪn10ɪ-hɪdakʊn
2ɪ-hɪɪk12ta-hɪɪk20i-hʌdʌkun ɪhɪɪk
3ɪ-hwaay13ta-hwaay30i-hʌdʌkun ɪhwaay
4ɪ-halɘm14ta-halɘm40i-hʌdʌkun ɪhalɘm
5i-duliin15ta-duliin50i-hʌdʌku idulii
6ɪ-nt̪ɘdakwalɔɔŋ16ta-nt̪ɘdakwalɔɔŋ60i-hʌdʌku int̪ɘdakwalɔɔ
7ɪ-ntatɪŋɛɛl17ta-ntatɪŋɛɛl70i-hʌdʌku intatɪŋɛɛ
8ɪ-nt̪ɪŋɛrɛɛy18ta-nt̪ɪŋɛrɛɛy80i-hʌdʌku int̪ɪŋɛrɛɛ
9ɪ-nt̪ahʌdʌkun19ta-nt̪ahʌdʌkun90i-hʌdʌku int̪ahʌdʌku
10ɪ-hɪdakʊn20i-hʌdʌkun ɪhɪɪk100i-hʌdʌku ihʌdʌku

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crow language</span> Missouri Valley Siouan language of Montana, US

Crow is a Missouri Valley Siouan language spoken primarily by the Crow Nation in present-day southeastern Montana. The word Apsáalooke translates to "Children of the Large Beaked Bird", which was later incorrectly translated into English as 'Crow'. It is one of the larger populations of American Indian languages with 4,160 speakers according to the 2015 US Census.

Neo-Mandaic, also known as Modern Mandaic, sometimes called the "ratna", is the modern reflex of the Mandaic language, the liturgical language of the Mandaean religious community of Iraq and Iran. Although severely endangered, it survives today as the first language of a small number of Mandaeans in Iran and in the Mandaean diaspora. All Neo-Mandaic speakers are multilingual in the languages of their neighbors, Arabic and Persian, and the influence of these languages upon the grammar of Neo-Mandaic is considerable, particularly in the lexicon and the morphology of the noun. Nevertheless, Neo-Mandaic is more conservative even in these regards than most other Neo-Aramaic languages.

The Elgeyo language, or Kalenjin proper, are a dialect cluster of the Kalenjin branch of the Nilotic language family.

Yiddish grammar is the system of principles which govern the structure of the Yiddish language. This article describes the standard form laid out by YIVO while noting differences in significant dialects such as that of many contemporary Hasidim. As a Germanic language descended from Middle High German, Yiddish grammar is fairly similar to that of German, though it also has numerous linguistic innovations as well as grammatical features influenced by or borrowed from Hebrew, Aramaic, and various Slavic languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maidu language</span> Extinct Maiduan language of northeastern California, US

Maidu, also Northeastern Maidu or Mountain Maidu, is an extinct Maiduan language of California, United States. It was spoken by the Maidu peoples who traditionally inhabit the mountains east and south of Lassen Peak in the American River and Feather River basins. These river regions include such valleys in the northern Sierra Nevada mountains of California as: Indian Valley, American Valley, Butte Valley, and Big Meadows. Maidu may also refer to the related Konkow and Nisenan languages.

The Ojibwe language is an Algonquian North American indigenous language spoken throughout the Great Lakes region and westward onto the northern plains. It is one of the largest indigenous language north of Mexico in terms of number of speakers, and exhibits a large number of divergent dialects. For the most part, this article describes the Minnesota variety of the Southwestern dialect. The orthography used is the Fiero Double-Vowel System.

This article discusses the grammar of the Western Lombard (Insubric) language. The examples are in Milanese, written according to the Classical Milanese orthography.

This article presents a brief overview of the grammar of the Sesotho and provides links to more detailed articles.

This article summarizes grammar in the Hawaiian language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nukak language</span> Endangered indigenous language of Colombia

The Nukak language is a language of uncertain classification, perhaps part of the macrofamily Puinave-Maku. It is very closely related to Kakwa.

Dirasha is a member of the Cushitic branch of the Afro-Asiatic family. It is spoken in the Omo region of Ethiopia, in the hills west of Lake Chamo, around the town of Gidole.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inflection</span> Process of word formation

In linguistic morphology, inflection is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness. The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, and one can refer to the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, determiners, participles, prepositions and postpositions, numerals, articles, etc., as declension.

Zero-marking in English is the indication of a particular grammatical function by the absence of any morpheme. The most common types of zero-marking in English involve zero articles, zero relative pronouns, and zero subordinating conjunctions. Examples are I like cats in which the absence of the definite article, the, signals cats to be an indefinite reference, whose specific identity is not known to the listener; that's the cat I saw in which the relative clause (that) I saw omits the implied relative pronoun, that, which would otherwise be the object of the clause's verb; and I wish you were here. in which the dependent clause, (that) you were here, omits the subordinating conjunction, that.

The grammar of the Otomi language displays a mixture of elements of synthetic and analytic structures. Particularly the phrase-level morphology is synthetic, whereas the sentence-level is analytic. Simultaneously, the language is head-marking in terms of its verbal morphology, but not in its nominal morphology, which is more analytic. Otomi recognizes three large open word classes of nouns, verbs, and particles. There is a small closed class of property words, variously analyzed as adjectives or stative verbs.

This article deals with the grammar of the Udmurt language.

Marra, sometimes formerly spelt Mara, is an Australian Aboriginal language, traditionally spoken on an area of the Gulf of Carpentaria coast in the Northern Territory around the Roper, Towns and Limmen Bight Rivers. Marra is now an endangered language. The most recent survey was in 1991; at that time, there were only 15 speakers, all elderly. Most Marra people now speak Kriol as their main language. The remaining elderly Marra speakers live in the Aboriginal communities of Ngukurr, Numbulwar, Borroloola and Minyerri.

Turkmen grammar is the grammar of the Turkmen language, whose dialectal variants are spoken in Turkmenistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, China, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and others. Turkmen grammar, as described in this article, is the grammar of standard Turkmen as spoken and written by Turkmen people in Turkmenistan.

Levantine Arabic grammar is the set of rules by which Levantine Arabic creates statements, questions and commands. In many respects, it is quite similar to that of the other vernacular Arabic varieties.

Ubykh was a polysynthetic language with a high degree of agglutination that had an ergative-absolutive alignment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judeo-Esfahani</span> Variety of Judeo-Iranian languages from Isfahan, Iran

Judeo-Esfahani, also spelled Judeo-Isfahani, is a spoken variety of the Judeo-Iranian languages. It originated in Isfahan, Iran, and is used today in Israel and the United States. In 2023 there were an estimated 2,000-7,000 speakers of Judeo-Esfahani, compared to 100,000 in 1900.

References

  1. Tima language at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
  2. "UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in danger". www.unesco.org. Retrieved 2018-08-03.
  3. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 3–4.
  4. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 3–5.
  5. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 19–20.
  6. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 78–89.
  7. Alamin Mubarak 2009, p. 83.
  8. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 158–174.
  9. Alamin Mubarak 2009, p. 161.
  10. Alamin Mubarak 2009, p. 168.
  11. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 113–115.
  12. Alamin Mubarak 2009, pp. 114–115.