Transparency in Wage Structures Act

Last updated

Transparency in Wage Structures Act
German Bundestag
  • The Act to promote Transparency in Wage Structures among Women and Men [1]
CitationTransparency in Wage Structures Act of 30 June 2017 (Federal Law Gazette I page  2152) [2]
Territorial extentGermany
Enacted byGerman Bundestag
Enacted30 June 2017
Commenced6 July 2017
Status: In force

The Transparency in Wage Structures Act (German : Entgelttransparenzgesetz; EntgTranspG) is a 2017 German law enacted to promote pay parity between men and women. [2] The law was strongly supported by Manuela Schwesig, the Federal Minister of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. [3] The law seeks to guarantee equal pay for equal work and provides mechanisms to enforce this, as well as reporting requirements for employers with more than 500 employees.

Contents

Summary

The Transparency in Wage Structures Act expressly prohibits direct or indirect discrimination on the grounds of gender with regard to all pay components and pay conditions in the case of equal work or work of equal value (§ 3). In this respect, it supplements the Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz  [ de ] (AGG), Germany's general anti-discrimination law, which was enacted in 2006. Various means of enforcing this prohibition are specified in the law.

Individual right to information

Under the act, employers with more than 200 employees are required to, upon request, explain the basis for the employee's compensation (§§ 10 – 16). The right to lodge these requests went into effect on 6 January 2018. [4]

For employers where a collective bargaining agreement is in effect, employees can request this information from the works council (§ 14); for employers without collective agreements, employees make the request to the employer directly (§ 15). [5] The right to information only exists when there are at least six employees who have comparable duties. [6] In the event of direct or indirect discrimination based on sex, the employer may be required to retroactively pay equal wages. [7]

Operational procedures for reviewing and establishing equal pay

Private employers with more than 500 employees are encouraged to voluntarily review their compensation structures and the application thereof to ensure equal compensation (§§ 17 – 20).

Reporting obligations for employers

Any employer that has more than 500 employees and is required to issue regular management reports under the German Commercial Code must produce a report on equality and pay parity. This report should contain the measures taken to promote the equality of women and men, the measures taken to ensure pay parity between women and men, and the results of those measures (§§ 21 - 22). If the employer does not take any measures to ensure pay parity, they must state their reasons for not doing so.

For employers that have or apply a collective bargaining agreement, reports must be produced every five years; all other employers are obligated to issue the report every three years. The report must be included in that period's management report and published in the Bundesanzeiger (§ 22).

Practical application

There are obstacles to the application of the Transparency in Wage Structures Act in practice. In human resources management, the question of "work equivalence" is defined exclusively on the basis of requirements. This is also indirectly specified by the text of the law, as it prescribes an evaluation that is independent of the employee's performance. As such, a data-driven analysis of the requirements is required. In addition to base compensation, additional forms of compensation (e.g. year-end bonus or company car) can be included. The reference compensation is determined using the median compensation of at least five other employees of the opposite sex.

Legislative history

In the 2013 coalition agreement, the CDU, CSU, and SPD initially agreed on a threshold of 500 employees for the individual right to information about the criteria used to determine compensation. [8] After Manuela Schwesig called for a threshold of 6 employees, the Federal Cabinet settled on a threshold of 200 employees for the individual right to information, but used the previously agreed-upon threshold of 500 employees for employer reporting obligations. [9]

On 30 March 2017, the Bundestag passed the bill with votes in favor from the CDU/CSU and SPD grand coalition, while Alliance 90/The Greens voted against, and The Left abstained. [10]

Criticism

At a public hearing of the Committee on Family Affairs, the German Trade Union Confederation criticized the bill for not providing for collective actions in the case of wage discrimination. The group applauded the introduction of the individual right to information, but noted that women would likely face professional retaliation for taking action alone against their employers. The German Association of Women Lawyers  [ de ] also criticized the planned compensation review process for being voluntary and only applying to employers with more than 500 employees, as actions on a voluntary basis have not produced successful outcomes in the past. [11]

The German Green Party criticized the threshold values of 200/500 employees and called for the law to be applicable for all employers. They further criticized the lack of a mechanism for unions to engage in collective actions. Die Linke criticized that the compensation reviews were not mandatory. [9]

The Confederation of German Employers' Associations criticized the law as being too bureaucratic and that the law misses its target of promoting career opportunities for women. [9]

Alexander Hagelüken and Thomas Öchsner researched the outcomes of the law in May 2018 on behalf of the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung . [12] In companies where pay inquiries were made directly to the employer instead of through a works council, a large number of employees did not make use of their right to information due to fear of retaliation. In general moreover the law had not seen much use. [12] The use of the median, along with the combination of base pay and fringe benefits as a single sum, results in a list where the employer only communicates the value in the middle of the list, which reduces the usefulness of the report. [12] The law only includes a subset of fringe benefits that employers might provide. [12] None of the 20 large companies they contacted stated that they planned any fundamental changes. [12]

Jurisprudcence

In a decision handed down on 21 January 2021, the Federal Labour Court ruled that if a female employee is paid less than the median of male employee in a comparable role, there is a rebuttable presumption under § 22 of the Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz that this is due to discrimination. [13]

Further reading

Related Research Articles

Labour laws, labour code or employment laws are those that mediate the relationship between workers, employing entities, trade unions, and the government. Collective labour law relates to the tripartite relationship between employee, employer, and union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wage</span> Payment by an employer to an employee for labour

A wage is payment made by an employer to an employee for work done in a specific period of time. Some examples of wage payments include compensatory payments such as minimum wage, prevailing wage, and yearly bonuses, and remunerative payments such as prizes and tip payouts. Wages are part of the expenses that are involved in running a business. It is an obligation to the employee regardless of the profitability of the company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Payroll tax</span> Tax imposed on employers or employees

Payroll taxes are taxes imposed on employers or employees, and are usually calculated as a percentage of the salaries that employers pay their employees. By law, some payroll taxes are the responsibility of the employee and others fall on the employer, but almost all economists agree that the true economic incidence of a payroll tax is unaffected by this distinction, and falls largely or entirely on workers in the form of lower wages. Because payroll taxes fall exclusively on wages and not on returns to financial or physical investments, payroll taxes may contribute to underinvestment in human capital, such as higher education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salary</span> Form of periodic payment from an employer to an employee

A salary is a form of periodic payment from an employer to an employee, which may be specified in an employment contract. It is contrasted with piece wages, where each job, hour or other unit is paid separately, rather than on a periodic basis. Salary can also be considered as the cost of hiring and keeping human resources for corporate operations, and is hence referred to as personnel expense or salary expense. In accounting, salaries are recorded in payroll accounts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993</span> US labor law

The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) is a United States labor law requiring covered employers to provide employees with job-protected, unpaid leave for qualified medical and family reasons. The FMLA was a major part of President Bill Clinton's first-term domestic agenda, and he signed it into law on February 5, 1993. The FMLA is administered by the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Pay Act of 1963</span> United States labor law of the New Frontier program

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States labor law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex. It was signed into law on June 10, 1963, by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program. In passing the bill, Congress stated that sex discrimination:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Employment Opportunity Commission</span> United States government agency enforcing civil rights laws against workplace discrimination

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a federal agency that was established via the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to administer and enforce civil rights laws against workplace discrimination. The EEOC investigates discrimination complaints based on an individual's race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, genetic information, and retaliation for participating in a discrimination complaint proceeding and/or opposing a discriminatory practice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian labour law</span> Rights and duties of workers, unions and employers in Australia

Australian labour law sets the rights of working people, the role of trade unions, and democracy at work, and the duties of employers, across the Commonwealth and in states. Under the Fair Work Act 2009, the Fair Work Commission creates a national minimum wage and oversees National Employment Standards for fair hours, holidays, parental leave and job security. The FWC also creates modern awards that apply to most sectors of work, numbering 150 in 2024, with minimum pay scales, and better rights for overtime, holidays, paid leave, and superannuation for a pension in retirement. Beyond this floor of rights, trade unions and employers often create enterprise bargaining agreements for better wages and conditions in their workplaces. In 2024, collective agreements covered 15% of employees, while 22% of employees were classified as "casual", meaning that they lose many protections other workers have. Australia's laws on the right to take collective action are among the most restrictive in the developed world, and Australia does not have a general law protecting workers' rights to vote and elect worker directors on corporation boards as do most other wealthy OECD countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States labor law</span> US laws on fair pay and conditions, unions, democracy, equality and security at work

United States labor law sets the rights and duties for employees, labor unions, and employers in the US. Labor law's basic aim is to remedy the "inequality of bargaining power" between employees and employers, especially employers "organized in the corporate or other forms of ownership association". Over the 20th century, federal law created minimum social and economic rights, and encouraged state laws to go beyond the minimum to favor employees. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 requires a federal minimum wage, currently $7.25 but higher in 29 states and D.C., and discourages working weeks over 40 hours through time-and-a-half overtime pay. There are no federal laws, and few state laws, requiring paid holidays or paid family leave. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 creates a limited right to 12 weeks of unpaid leave in larger employers. There is no automatic right to an occupational pension beyond federally guaranteed Social Security, but the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 requires standards of prudent management and good governance if employers agree to provide pensions, health plans or other benefits. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employees have a safe system of work.

Equal pay for equal work is the concept of labour rights that individuals in the same workplace be given equal pay. It is most commonly used in the context of sexual discrimination, in relation to the gender pay gap. Equal pay relates to the full range of payments and benefits, including basic pay, non-salary payments, bonuses and allowances. Some countries have moved faster than others in addressing equal pay.

Labor rights or workers' rights are both legal rights and human rights relating to labor relations between workers and employers. These rights are codified in national and international labor and employment law. In general, these rights influence working conditions in the relations of employment. One of the most prominent is the right to freedom of association, otherwise known as the right to organize. Workers organized in trade unions exercise the right to collective bargaining to improve working conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009</span> Federal statute in the United States

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 is a landmark federal statute in the United States that was the first bill signed into law by U.S. President Barack Obama on January 29, 2009. The act amends Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and states that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new paycheck affected by that discriminatory action. The law directly addressed Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007), a U.S. Supreme Court decision that the statute of limitations for presenting an equal-pay lawsuit begins on the date that the employer makes the initial discriminatory wage decision, not at the date of the most recent paycheck.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</span> United States wage law

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 29 U.S.C. § 203 (FLSA) is a United States labor law that creates the right to a minimum wage, and "time-and-a-half" overtime pay when people work over forty hours a week. It also prohibits employment of minors in "oppressive child labor". It applies to employees engaged in interstate commerce or employed by an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, unless the employer can claim an exemption from coverage. The Act was enacted by the 75th Congress and signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938.

Employment practices liability is an area of United States labor law that deals with wrongful termination, sexual harassment, discrimination, invasion of privacy, false imprisonment, breach of contract, emotional distress, and wage and hour law violations. It may be categorized as a form of professional liability. Employment practices liability insurance (EPL) is sold as a type of management liability insurance, which is related to professional liability insurance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paycheck Fairness Act</span> Proposed law to address the gender pay gap

The Paycheck Fairness Act is a proposed United States labor law that would add procedural protections to the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Fair Labor Standards Act as part of an effort to address the gender pay gap in the United States. A Census Bureau report published in 2008 stated that women's median annual earnings were 77.5% of men's earnings. Recently this has narrowed, as by 2018, this was estimated to have decreased to women earning 80-85% of men's earnings. One study suggests that when the data is controlled for certain variables, the residual gap is around 5-7%; the same study concludes that the residual is because "hours of work in many occupations are worth more when given at particular moments and when the hours are more continuous. That is, in many occupations, earnings have a nonlinear relationship with respect to hours."

Gender pay gap in Australia looks at the persistence of a gender pay gap in Australia. In Australia, the principle of "equal pay for equal work" was introduced in 1969. Anti-discrimination on the basis of sex was legislated in 1984.

County of Washington v. Gunther, 452 U.S. 161 (1981), is a United States labor law case concerning discrimination and the lower standards of protection for gender pay because of the Bennett Amendment in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, §703(h).

In law, wrongful dismissal, also called wrongful termination or wrongful discharge, is a situation in which an employee's contract of employment has been terminated by the employer, where the termination breaches one or more terms of the contract of employment, or a statute provision or rule in employment law. Laws governing wrongful dismissal vary according to the terms of the employment contract, as well as under the laws and public policies of the jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Pay Day</span> Symbolic day dedicated to raising awareness of the gender pay gap

Equal Pay Day is the symbolic day dedicated to raising awareness of the gender pay gap. In the United States, this date symbolizes how far into the year the average median woman must work in order to have earned what the average median man had earned the entire previous year. The exact day differs year by year. In 2022, it was March 15. On average, women earn $0.82 for every dollar men earned in 2019.

Wage transparency, salary compensation, and compensation transparency generally, involves disclosure of employee compensation amounts, either among other employees in an organization, to owners, to government regulators, or to the public.

References

  1. ↑ "The Act to promote Transparency in Wage Structures among Women and Men". Federal Ministry of Justice . Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  2. 1 2 "Gesetz zur Förderung der Entgelttransparenz zwischen Frauen und Männern (Entgelttransparenzgesetz - EntgTranspG)". Federal Ministry of Justice . Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  3. ↑ "Große Firmen müssen Löhne offenbaren" [Large Companies Must Reveal Wages]. Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk (in German). 30 March 2017. Archived from the original on 25 January 2018. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  4. ↑ "BMFSFJ - Gesetz für mehr Lohngerechtigkeit tritt in Kraft" [Law to Promote Pay Parity Goes into Effect]. Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (in German). 6 July 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  5. ↑ Weigert, Daniel-René (2018). "Die Reichweite tarifbezogener Privilegierungen im Rahmen des Entgelttransparenzgesetzes". Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (NZA). 35 (4): 210–215.
  6. ↑ Kahlweit, Cathrin; Rexer, Andrea (5 April 2018). "Gleichstellung: Ehrlichkeit tut weh" [Equal Treatment: Honesty Hurts]. Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  7. ↑ Kuhn, Anke (12 January 2017). "Entgelttransparenzgesetz verabschiedet - Es droht nur ein Imageschaden" [Pay Transparency Act passes - Only Threat is Damage to the Company's Image]. Legal Tribune Online (in German). Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  8. ↑ Lelley, Jan Tibor; Feindura, Sabine; Darenberg, Jan (19 April 2017). "Das Entgelttransparenzgesetz - Gut gemeint und schlecht gemacht? Eine Einschätzung für die Praxis". deutscher-anwaltspiegel.de (in German). Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  9. 1 2 3 Reinsch, Melanie (11 January 2017). "Lohngleichheitsgesetz - Nur die Hälfte der Frauen profitiert" [Wage Transparency Law - Only Half of Women Benefit]. Frankfurter Rundschau (in German). Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  10. ↑ "Plenarprotokoll 18/228" (PDF). Deutscher Bundestag. 30 March 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  11. ↑ "Deutscher Bundestag, Anhörung: Geplantes Entgelttransparenzgesetz differenziert beurteilt" [Differentiated assessment of planned pay transparency law]. Bundestag (in German). 6 March 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Hagelüken, Alexander; Öchsner, Thomas (26 May 2018). "Wer verdient was?" [Who Earns What?]. sueddeutsche.de . Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  13. ↑ "BAG: Gehalt unterm Median spricht für Diskriminierung" [Federal Labour Court: Pay Below Median an Argument for Discrimination]. Legal Tribune Online (in German). 21 January 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.