Trial and execution of Anne du Bourg

Last updated
Anne du Bourg being burned at the stake. Anne du Bourg.gif
Anne du Bourg being burned at the stake.

The trial and execution of Anne du Bourg was a critical event in the history of religious conflict in Paris, prior to the outbreak of the French Wars of Religion three years later. Anne du Bourg a judge in the Paris Parlement, would be executed, after calling the King Henry II an adulterer and blasphemer, and refusing to affirm the Real presence. He would be garrotted and burned on 23 December 1559. Several of his colleagues who had been arrested along with him, would be forced to recant their beliefs before returning to re-join the court. His trial would inflame religious tensions in Paris, leading directly to the assassination of President Minard, and contributing to the powder keg that exploded in the riot of Saint Medard a few months later.

Contents

Background

Royal policy

Beginning in the reign of François I, Protestantism would be subject to organised persecution in France. [1] This would continue into the reign of his son Henri II, notably in the Edict of Compiègne (1557) and the Edict of Ecouen (1559). [2] Despite these efforts, Protestantism would continue to grow stronger, from two churches in 1555, to a national synod in 1559 with around 1.5 million adherents. [3] Heretic hunting by the Paris Parlement had slackened by the mid-1550s, with no one executed for heresy in 1555, with an attempt on the King's life in 1557, new legislation to push the Parlement's to action was introduced. [4] However, Henri II remained unsatisfied with their progress, and their reticence to register the Edict of Ecouen into law, but was not able to push them into more aggressive action, until the conclusion of peace with the Habsburgs and English in the Peace of Cateau Cambresis. [5]

Hostility in the city of Paris to the Huguenots exploded after the royal loss at the Battle of St. Quentin (1557), for which they were blamed by popular preachers. [6] Shortly thereafter an angry crowd surrounded a secret Protestant site of worship on the rue St Jacques, threatening and throwing stones at those who tried to leave. [6] Over one hundred would be arrested by the Parisian authorities following this, with 8 executed. [7] It was into this volatile environment that Henri would attend a mercurial session of Parlement.

The judiciary

While the judiciary largely resisted the Protestant reformation, and remained overwhelmingly Catholic, the Paris judiciary was largely of the moderate Erasmian Catholic variety, which disapproved of burning people solely for privately held views and who were hostile to what they felt was Papal interference in France's religious affairs. [8] This wing of the court was led by Presidents Seguier, de Hurley and de Thou. [9] There was regardless an ultra Catholic wing of the court, led by Presidents Le Maistre, and Minard. [9] There were however several Protestant justices among the Paris judiciary, including Louis du Faur and Anne du Bourg. [10]

The visit of the King

Henri II visits the Mercurial session, engraving by Frans Hogenberg Proces d'Anne du Bourg.tiff
Henri II visits the Mercurial session, engraving by Frans Hogenberg

Prelude

Matters between the ultras and the moderates in Parlement came to a head in March 1559, when three prisoners appealed their death sentences in the Tournelles having been accused of heresy. [9] The judges, more liberal by disposition were ill inclined to sentence the prisoners to death, and offered them amnesty in return for their recanting. [9] The prisoners refused to recant, frustrating the judges, who proceeded to ask for an explanation in writing. [9] This done they reduced their sentences to banishment. [9] The direction the Tournelle was taking under the liberal judges frustrated the ultra wing of the court, who controlled the Grand Chambre. [9] The gens du roi convened a mercuriale session in the hope of restoring discipline among the judges, and healing any potential breach that might be forming. [9] The first session of the mercuriale was in the last week of April. [11] The court began to reach a consensus in favour of the moderate faction in its first few sessions, favouring leaving heresy as a problem for a church council. [11] Fumée went further, and argued for a suspension of the death penalty for heresy until such time as religious clarity achieved. [11] This frightened the ultra wing of the court under Presidents Le Maistre, Saint-Andre and Minard. [11] They went to the King, urging him to surprise the court during a later mercurial session and to verify what they said about the 'many Lutheran' members of the court. [11]

The day of the visit

On 10 June, Henri II attended a session of the Parlement, accompanied by François, Duke of Guise, Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine, Louis, Duke of Montpensier and Anne de Montmorency. [12] Alongside his grievances at the failure to register his edict, he had also been passed a list of suspect Huguenot judges by the informers among the judiciary. [12] The King interrupted the deliberations of Parlement that were ongoing, expressing his dissatisfaction at how they were pursuing heresy before instructing them to continue their discussion. [12] Viole then stood to advocate for submitting heresy to a church council. [13] Le Maistre and only 14 other judges rose to advocate for the death sentence. [13] Several councillors went further in favour of Protestantism, with Louis du Faur going as far as to attack the King directly through the use of scripture in quoting Elijah's words to King Ahab. [10] Whilst Anne du Bourg took a more personal line, contrasting the widespread prosperous condition of blasphemers and adulterers, with the pure community of reformers, who desired only to cleanse the church. [10] After the conseillers had spoken, it was the turn of the Presidents; de Hurley, and Seguier offered a defence of the courts conduct, and thus implicitly the moderates, Minard meanwhile emphasised that royal edicts such as those on heresy should be obeyed. [14] Le Maistre went furthest, praising Philip II for his extermination of the Cathars, with the implicit comparison that Henri should do likewise for Protestants. [14] The King still enraged by the words of du Bourg and du Faur demanded the Parlement register be surrendered to him before storming out. [14] He was a serial adulterer himself, and thus interpreted du Bourg's comments as an indirect attack, and thus Lèse-majesté. [10] He would be arrested, alongside du Faur, Fumée, de Foix and de la Porte, whilst Viole, du Ferrier and du Val would escape arrest by hiding with sympathetic colleagues until the crisis had passed. [14]

Trial and bargaining

Trial of the others

Du Bourg and the other judges would be housed in the Bastille, with a special commission established to try them on 19 June. [10] In theory Parlementaires could only be tried by the whole body of their colleagues, but this was ignored. [14] Two of the justices assigned to try the Parlementaires were former Chambre Ardente judges, Saint-Andre and Guyent. [14] Also judging would be de Mesmes and the bishop of Paris du Bellay. [14] The King vowed to see du Bourg burn with his own eyes, however he would be killed at a joust celebrating the peace of Cateau Cambresis on July 10, succeeded by his young son François II who was governed by his maternal uncles, the Guise. [10] [15] Du Faur's crime was the second most serious, and as such he would be given the strictest non death sentence of the defendants, a fine and a 5-year suspension, the Parlement not enthusiastic to put any of its own to death. [16] [17] None of the other defendants wanted to fight on religious grounds, and they chose to challenge the authority of their judges to try them legally. [18] De la Porte would be punished only in having to retract his comments about the severity of the Grand Chambre. [19] Fumée appealed to Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine for clemency. [19] De Foix found his trial complicated by the fact he'd distinguished Sacramentarians from Lutherans in terms of who should receive the death penalty. [19] De Thou intervened on his behalf and he was obliged to renounce this view before the whole court and he was also suspended for a year though this was annulled. [20]

Trial of du Bourg

The trial of Anne du Bourg gripped Paris, as he alone broke against outward conformity, in admitting to attending services and denying the miracle of mass when pressed by his judges. [17] Efforts continued into December to avoid the scandal of a public execution, a compromise confession of faith being drawn up for him to sign, which on December 13 he did. [17] The execution would not however be averted, as on December 19, fearing he had become a Nicodemite, he repudiated his signature. [17] Despite the pleas of Margaret of Valois, Duchess of Berry and Frederick III, Elector Palatine his execution would go ahead. [21]

The assassination of President Minard

Whilst du Bourg languished in prison, his coreligionists were active in achieving revenge on the outside. In both October and December there would be failed attempts to jail break du Bourg. [17] On December 12, ten masked horsemen gunned down the ultra judge, President Minard. outside his home. [17] On the same day they also killed the informer of Henri II, Julian Fermé. [22] The gates to Paris were quickly closed, while house to house searches could be conducted. [23] Robert Stuart was determined as a suspect, and he was charged with the assassination of Minard, a plot to free du Bourg from prison and a plot to burn down Paris, though he confessed nothing under torture. [23]

Execution

To avoid any escape on the day of the execution, guards would be added around du Bourg, as he was transferred to the Place de Greve on December 23. [24] However they would end up being used more to keep the Catholic crowd back from seizing him themselves, than they would be blocking any such attempts. [24] As had become the custom Anne du Bourg was garroted before being burned, as the Parlement felt burning alive was too cruel a punishment. [25] The Cardinal of Lorraine wrote to the French ambassador in Rome of his hope that this execution would act as a deterrent against Protestantism, yet for the Protestants he would be a prime martyr justifying resistance. [25]

Aftermath

Sectarian violence in Paris, that first exploded as a result of du Bourg's execution in a major way with the Saint Medard riot, would only increase over the following years in Paris as the situation deteriorated. [26] This would culminate in the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in which over 3000 Protestants would be killed. [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francis II of France</span> King of France from 1559 to 1560

Francis II was King of France from 1559 to 1560. He was also King consort of Scotland as a result of his marriage to Mary, Queen of Scots, from 1558 until his death in 1560.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">French Wars of Religion</span> 1562–1598 Catholic-Protestant conflicts

The French Wars of Religion refers to the period of civil war between French Catholics and Protestants from 1562 to 1598. Between two and four million people died from violence, famine or disease directly caused by the conflict, and it severely damaged the power of the French monarchy. One of its most notorious episodes was the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in 1572. The fighting ended with a compromise in 1598, when Henry of Navarre, who had converted to Catholicism in 1593, was proclaimed King Henry IV of France and issued the Edict of Nantes, which granted substantial rights and freedoms to the Huguenots. However, Catholics continued to disapprove of Protestants and of Henry, and his assassination in 1610 triggered a fresh round of Huguenot rebellions in the 1620s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of Guise</span> French noble family

The House of Guise was a prominent French noble family, that was involved heavily in the French Wars of Religion. The House of Guise was the founding house of the Principality of Joinville.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michel de l'Hôpital</span> French statesman and lawyer (1506–1573)

Michel de l'Hôpital was a French lawyer, diplomat and chancellor during the latter Italian Wars and the early French Wars of Religion. The son of a doctor in the service of Constable Bourbon he spent his early life exiled from France at Bourbon's and then the emperors court. When his father entered the service of the House of Lorraine, he entered the patronage network of Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine. Through his marriage to Marie Morin, he acquired a seat in the Paris Parlement. In this capacity he drew up the charges for the king, concerning the defenders of Boulogne who surrendered the city in 1544, before taking a role as a diplomat to the Council of Trent in 1547. The following year he assisted Anne d'Este in the details of her inheritance to ensure she could marry Francis, Duke of Guise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amboise conspiracy</span>

The Amboise conspiracy, also called Tumult of Amboise, was a failed attempt by a Huguenot faction in France to gain control over the young king Francis II and to reverse the policies of the current administration of Francis, Duke of Guise and Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine through their arrest, and potentially execution. Malcontent factions of Huguenots had been chafing under the French crown since the reign of Henry II and with the arrival of a new young king, saw their chance to take power for themselves. However the plot was uncovered ahead of time, and the Guise were ready for them. As such hundreds would be arrested, and many killed. Louis, Prince of Condé was suspected of involvement, however he was able to flee south, and it was only after some months that the Guise were able to put him on trial. Shortly thereafter, the sickly Francis II died, their hold on the administration collapsed, and with it the conviction of Condé. This tumult would be one of the key steps in the collapse of crown authority that led to the French Wars of Religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edict of Saint-Germain</span> 1562 French decree on religious tolerance

The Edict of Saint-Germain, also known as the Edict of January, was a landmark decree of tolerance promulgated by the regent of France, Catherine de' Medici, in January 1562. The edict provided limited tolerance to the Protestant Huguenots in the Catholic realm, though with counterweighing restrictions on their behaviour. The act represented the culmination of several years of slowly liberalising edicts which had begun with the 1560 Edict of Amboise. After two months the Paris Parlement would be compelled to register it by the rapidly deteriorating situation in the capital. The practical impact of the edict would be highly limited by the subsequent outbreak of the first French Wars of Religion but it would form the foundation for subsequent toleration edicts as the Edict of Nantes of 1598.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacques de Savoie, Duke of Nemours</span>

Jacques de Savoie, duc de Nemours was a French military commander, governor and Prince Étranger. Having inherited his titles at a young age, Nemours fought for king Henri II during the latter Italian Wars, seeing action at the siege of Metz and the stunning victories of Renty and Calais in 1554 and 1558. Already a commander of French infantry, he received promotion to commander of the light cavalry after the capture of Calais in 1558. A year prior he had accompanied François, Duke of Guise on his entry into Italy, as much for the purpose of campaigning as to escape the king's cousin Antoine of Navarre who was threatening to kill him for his extra-marital pursuit of Navarre's cousin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anne du Bourg</span>

Anne du Bourg was a French magistrate, nephew of the chancellor Antoine du Bourg, and a Protestant martyr.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peace of Saint-Germain-en-Laye</span> 1570 treaty between France and the Huguenots

The Peace of Saint-Germain-en-Laye was signed on 8 August 1570 by Charles IX of France, Gaspard II de Coligny and Jeanne d'Albret, and ended the 1568 to 1570 Third Civil War, part of the French Wars of Religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edict of Amboise</span> 1563 armistice in the French Wars of Religion

The Edict of Amboise, also known as the Edict of Pacification, was signed at the Château of Amboise on 19 March 1563 by Catherine de' Medici, acting as regent for her son Charles IX of France. The Edict ended the first stage of the French Wars of Religion, inaugurating a period of official peace in France by guaranteeing the Huguenots religious privileges and freedoms. However, it was gradually undermined by continuing religious violence at a regional level and hostilities renewed in 1567.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peace of Longjumeau</span> 1568 treaty which ended the second phase of the French Wars of Religion

The Peace of Longjumeau was signed on 23 March 1568 by Charles IX of France and Catherine de' Medici. The edict brought to an end the brief second French Wars of Religion with terms that largely confirmed those of the prior edict of Amboise. Unlike the previous edict it would not be sent to the Parlements to examine prior to its publication, due to what the crown had felt was obstructionism the last time. The edict would not however last, and it would be overturned later in the year, being replaced by the Edict of Saint-Maur which outlawed Protestantism at the beginning of the third war of religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massacre of Vassy</span> 1562 mass killing of Huguenot worshippers by soldiers in Wassy, France

The Massacre of Vassy was the murder of Huguenot worshippers and citizens in an armed action by troops of Francis, Duke of Guise, in Wassy, France, on 1 March 1562. The massacre is identified as the first major event in the French Wars of Religion. The series of battles that followed concluded in the signing of the Peace of Amboise the next year, on 19 March 1563.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles I, Cardinal de Bourbon</span> French cardinal

Charles de Bourbon, Cardinal de Bourbon, Archbishop of Rouen was a French noble, prelate and disputed King of France as the Catholic Ligue candidate from 2 August 1589 – 9 May 1590. Born the third son of Charles of Bourbon, Duke of Vendôme and Françoise d'Alençon he was destined for a career in the church. As a member of the House of Bourbon-Vendôme he was one of the premier Prince du sang. Already having secured several sees, he was made a Cardinal by Pope Paul III in January 1548. In 1550 he received the office of Archbishop of Rouen making him the Primate of Normandy. The following year the promotion of Bourbon to Patriarch of the French church was threatened by King Henry II to secure concessions from the Pope. During the Italian Wars which resumed that year he played a role supporting Catherine de Medici's regency governments in France and briefly holding a lieutenant-generalship in Picardy. In 1557 the Pope appointed the Cardinals Bourbon, Lorraine and Châtillon as the leaders of an inquisition in France to root out heresy. The effectiveness of their inquisition would be obstructed by both the king and the Parlements and by July 1558 their appointments were voided by the Parlement of Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louis de Bourbon, Duke of Montpensier</span> Duke of Montpensier

Louis de Bourbon, Duc de Montpensier was the second Duke of Montpensier, a French Prince of the Blood, military commander and governor. He began his military career during the Italian Wars, and in 1557 was captured after the disastrous battle of Saint-Quentin. His liberty restored he found himself courted by the new regime as it sought to steady itself and isolate its opponents in the wake of the Conspiracy of Amboise. At this time Montpensier supported liberalising religious reform, as typified by the Edict of Amboise he was present for the creation of.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edict of July</span>

The Edict of July, also known as the Edict of Saint-Germain was a decree of limited tolerance promulgated by the regent of France, Catherine de' Medici, in July 1561. Whilst it emphasised a continued commitment to banning Huguenot worship in France, it granted pardon for all religious offenses since the reign of Henry II, who had died two years earlier, which was a victory for the Protestant community. A further Protestant victory was in the reaffirmation of the removal of the death penalty for heresy cases. The edict would be overtaken by events, and ultimately left unenforced as France moved first to the landmark Edict of Saint-Germain and then into the Wars of Religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Estates General of 1560-1</span>

The Estates General of 1560-1 was a national meeting of the three estates of France, the clergy, nobility and commoners convoked by François II, though he would die before it could begin. It represented the first meeting of the estates general in 76 years, the last one having been convened by Charles VIII at Tours. Meeting at Orléans the estates would be tasked with providing solutions to the crowns dire fiscal problems, a legacy of the Habsburg–Valois Wars, and the growing religious problem caused by the Reformation. The estates would however be unable to finish their deliberations, with Catherine de' Medici proroguing the session, and reconvening the estates general at a later date in 1561 at Pontoise, where she sought a more agreeable selection of delegates. Ultimately the work of the estates would solve neither the crowns fiscal insolvency or the religious conflict, which exploded in the Wars of Religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edict of Romorantin</span> 1560 French edict on punishing heretics

The Edict of Romorantin, was a decree designed to alter the prosecution of heretics, promulgated by the King of France, François II, in May 1560. The decree came in the wake of the Amboise conspiracy in which many Protestant Huguenots had participated. Conscious that the previous policy of persecution embodied in the edicts of Châteaubriant and Compiègne had thus failed, the crown and the chancellor altered their strategy by distinguishing for the first time between heretics and rebels. The edict would transfer the prosecution of heretics who had committed no other offence to the ecclesiastical courts, which lacked the power to give death sentences. The edict would be confirmed in January 1561 then superseded, first by the Edict of July, which maintained its provision concerning ecclesiastical courts, and by the more radical Edict of Saint-Germain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edict of Amboise (1560)</span> French decree on religion

The Edict of Amboise (1560) was a decree that created the framework to separate heresy from sedition, promulgated by the young king Francis II on the advice of his council and mother Catherine de' Medici. The edict was the first promulgated in France that lessened the persecution of Huguenots through the provision of amnesty for past religious crimes on the condition the offender returned to the Catholic fold. The edict was published during the Amboise conspiracy whilst the royal court was resident in the Château d'Amboise and their authority over France was shaken. It would be superseded first by the Edict of Romorantin in May of the same year, then the Edict of July and finally the Edict of Saint-Germain

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edict of 19 April</span>

The Edict of 19 April was a religious edict promulgated by the regency council of Charles IX of France on 19 April 1561. The edict would confirm the decision of the Estates General of 1560-1 as regarded the amnesty for religious prisoners. The edict would however go further in an effort to calm the unrest that was sweeping France, outlawing the use of religious epithets and providing a pathway for religious exiles to return to the country. Despite not being an edict of toleration for Protestantism, the more conservative Catholics would interpret the edict as a concession to the Huguenots, leading to the Parlement of Paris to remonstrate the crown. The edict would be endorsed and furthered in the more sweeping Edict of July a few months later, before it in turn was superseded by the first edict of toleration, the Edict of Saint-Germain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assassination of Admiral Coligny</span>

The assassination of Admiral Coligny on 24 August 1572 would prelude one of the critical events of the French Wars of Religion, the Massacre of Saint Bartholomew. The figures responsible for first the attempt on his life on 22 August and then his execution on 24 August have long been debated by historians. Coligny's feud with Henry I, Duke of Guise throughout the 1560s and his desire to bring France into conflict with Spain are often cited as key factors. The attempt on his life took place in the wake of the marriage between Navarre and Margaret of Valois a high-profile affair intended as a component of the Peace of Saint-Germain-en-Laye by Catherine de'Medici and her son Charles IX

References

  1. Knecht, Robert (1984). Francis I. Cambridge University Press. pp. 405–6. ISBN   0521278872.
  2. Knecht, Robert (2001). The Rise and Fall of Renaissance France 1483-1610. Blackwell. p. 241.
  3. Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 92. ISBN   9780199596799.
  4. Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 91. ISBN   9780199596799.
  5. Diefendorf, Barbara (1991). Beneath the Cross: Catholics and Huguenots in Sixteenth-Century Paris. Oxford University Press. p. 52. ISBN   0195070135.
  6. 1 2 Diefendorf, Barbara (1991). Beneath the Cross: Catholics and Huguenots in Sixteenth-Century Paris. Oxford University Press. p. 51. ISBN   0195070135.
  7. Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 95. ISBN   9780199596799.
  8. Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 110. ISBN   9780199596799.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press. p. 234. ISBN   0520086260.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 111. ISBN   9780199596799.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California. p. 235. ISBN   0520086260.
  12. 1 2 3 Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 110. ISBN   9780199596799.
  13. 1 2 Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press. p. 236. ISBN   0520086260.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press. p. 237. ISBN   0520086260.
  15. Thompson, James (1909). The Wars of Religion 1559-76: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Phillip II. Chicago University Press. pp. 3–6.
  16. Thompson, James (1909). The Wars of Religion 1559-76: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Phillip II. Chicago University Press. p. 13.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 113. ISBN   9780199596799.
  18. Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press. p. 245. ISBN   0520086260.
  19. 1 2 3 Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press. p. 246. ISBN   0520086260.
  20. Roelker, Nancy (1996). One King, One Faith, The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press. p. 247. ISBN   0520086260.
  21. Thompson, James (1909). The Wars of Religion 1559-76: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici, and Phillip II. Chicago University Press. p. 14.
  22. Carroll, Stuart (2006). Blood and Violence in Early Modern France. Oxford University Press. p. 269. ISBN   9780199290451.
  23. 1 2 Diefendorf, Barbara (1991). Beneath the Cross: Catholics and Huguenots in Sixteenth Century Paris. Oxford University Press. p. 55. ISBN   0195070135.
  24. 1 2 Diefendorf, Barbara (1991). Beneath the Cross: Catholics and Huguenots in Sixteenth-Century Paris. Oxford University Press. pp. 55–6. ISBN   0195070135.
  25. 1 2 Carroll, Stuart (2009). Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 114. ISBN   9780199596799.
  26. Diefendorf, Barbara (1991). Beneath the Cross: Catholics and Huguenots in Sixteenth Century Paris. Oxford University Press. p. 54. ISBN   0195070135.
  27. Armstrong, Alastair (2003). France 1500-1715. Heinemann. pp. 70–1. ISBN   0-435-32751-8.