Uniform Anatomical Gift Act

Last updated

The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), and its periodic revisions, is one of the Uniform Acts drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), also known as the Uniform Law Commission (ULC), in the United States with the intention of harmonizing state laws between the states. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

The UAGA governs organ donations for the purpose of transplantation. [3] The Act permits any adult to become an organ donor. [4] It also governs the making of anatomical gifts of one's cadaver to be dissected in the study of medicine. [3] The law prescribes the forms by which such gifts can be made. [3] [2] [1] It also provides that in the absence of such a document, a surviving spouse, or if there is no spouse, a list of specific relatives in order of preference, can make the gift. [3] It also seeks to limit the liability of health care providers who act on good faith representations that a deceased patient meant to make an anatomical gift. [3] The Act also prohibits trafficking and trafficking in human organs for profit from donations for transplant or therapy. [5] [6]

The UAGA provides a template for the legislation to adjust public policy and align it with developments in medical practice. [3] Some states have their own version of the UAGA which is an updated version of the Uniform laws already enacted throughout the United States. [7] [8]

History

There were three versions of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act that were enacted; the first was the UAGA of 1968, which was followed up with revisions in 1987. The most recent version was created in 2006. [3] The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act has been established in some form, in every state and the District of Columbia (D.C.), as of 2017. [7] [4]

The law has been revised to make the process of making an anatomical gift more streamlined, and to promote organ donation to citizens in order to address the high demand for donated organs for transplantation.[ citation needed ] The demand for donated organs is extremely high due to the fact that a large number of people die while waiting for an organ transplant in the United States. [5] [3] As of 2016, there were fewer registered organ donors than people in need of an organ or tissue transplant. [5]

Formerly, anatomical gifts had to be executed with testamentary formalities, including the creation of a written document with two witnesses; the latest version of the statute eliminates the requirement of the witnesses. [2] Medical examiners and medical professionals who cared for a patient upon their death were previously permitted to remove a part of a body if there was no known next of kin, or if the body was unidentified. [5] This change is to encourage the practice of allowing an anatomical gift to be made by a notation on a driver's license. [5] [3]

The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1968

The first Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was created after the first successful heart transplant in 1967; the operation was performed by Dr. Christiaan Barnard. [3] In 1968, Congress approved the UAGA and recommended that all states adopt it. [9] The Act was the first legislation enacted by all states in United States to address the donation of organs, tissues, and eyes as gifts to someone who may be in need of an organ for survival. [2] [3] The UAGA was drafted in order to increase organ and blood supplies and donation and to protect patients in the United States. [9] It replaced numerous state laws concerning transplantation and laws lacking a uniform procedure of organ donation and an inadequate process of becoming a donor. [9]

All states adopted the original version of the law. [2]

The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1987

In 1987, the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1968 was revised so that there was a uniform manner of obtaining consent from individuals. [9] [3] At this time, every state enacted at least some part of the UAGA. [9] The provisions of the UAGA of 1968 would ban the purchase and sale of body parts, facilitate the simplified process of obtaining authorization to retrieve organs, and ensure that medical staff establish procedures and guidelines to identify organ donors while under hospital care. [10] The Act also characterized a body part or organ as property because of the ability of a living individual to gift parts of their body to another individual. [1] [9] Another major statement that this revised version of the UAGA made was that a coroner's investigation or an autopsy could not be obstructed by an individual's wish for organ donation. [9] The 1987 UAGA regulated organs for the purposes of transplantation or therapy. [10] In addition, the individual's wishes to donate were prioritized over the family's or next of kin's wishes. Hospitals were authorized to retrieve organs if an individual was found to have documentation of consenting. [10]

The Act's revisions were enacted by 26 states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. [1]

The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006

Summary

In 2006, The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was revised with three main goals: motivating more of the population to make anatomical gifts, making honoring an individual's wishes to donate a priority, and maintaining the current organ donation and transplantation system in the United States. [5] It also has the purpose of setting rules and guidelines for determining the purposes that one had for choosing to make a gift as well as the purpose of the gift of an organ, eye, or tissue itself. [3] The UAGA was revised to accommodate the developments in medicine and science regarding organ donation and transplantation, as well as the regulations of donation and transplantation with the goal of increasing the supply of gifted organs. [5] [3] The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006 was revised to make the laws governing anatomical gifts more uniform between states that had enacted and continued to enforce the UAGA of 1968 and ones that had enacted the revised UAGA of 1987, leading to more consistency. [3]

Revisions

The UAGA of 2006 allows for individuals to consent to organ donation by expressing their wish when obtaining a driver's license, through verbal expression, by writing it in a will or other advance directive, or in any other manner, simplifying the consent process. [3] This is also known as "opting in" to organ donation.[ citation needed ] In some states, one may register to become an organ donor online on a state's Donor Registry website, and an individual is permitted to choose which organs they wish to donate by checking boxes. [5] An important addition to the UAGA of 2006 was the strengthening of certain language regarding one's right to make a decision for themselves pertaining to consent of organ donation, making it harder for others to try to nullify one's wish to consent after their death. [6] [3] The only exception allowing an individual's consent to donate to be overridden is in the case of the death of a minor when parents or guardians may override the minor's consent. [6] [3] Language in the Act is also made more clear so that one cannot revoke an anatomical gift as the donor's decision is final. [6] [3] This revised UAGA additionally created legislation allowing certain people to make an anatomical gift to another person while the donating individual is still alive. [3] It is stated that it's the duty of law enforcement officers, firefighters, paramedics, and other emergency personnel to search for the records of donor consent upon death. [5] Another significant addition to the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006 is the rule of making transplantation or therapy prioritized over research or education with an anatomical gift when a donor's wishes are unclearly stated in documentation. [3]

The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 2006 clarifies words written in the law that formerly were ambiguous and confusing such as: anatomical gift, record, refusal, guardian, prospective donor, reasonably available, and disinterested witness. [6] [5]

The UAGA revision of 2006 makes it a felony punishable by a fine or prison to falsify, deface, or destroy organ donor documentation of another. [5]

Many states have drafted and enacted their own updated versions of the UAGA based on the revisions of 2006. [7] [8]

Legislation status of UAGA in the U.S.

In the United States, all states have enacted some version of the UAGA. [7] [8] States have the authority to use the Uniform Anatomical Gift Acts as a template to put additional revisions into law depending on what best fits the state's needs. [7]

Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) Legislation of U.S. States and Territories [7] [8] [1] [2] [3] [5]
U.S. State or TerritoryUAGA Legislation VersionState Law LocationLegal Citation
Alabama2006Title 22, Chapter 19, Article 9, Alabama CodeAla. Code § 22-19-160 to § 22-19-174
Alaska2006Title 13, Chapter 52, Article 4, Alaska StatutesAlaska Stat. §§ 13.52.170-13.52.280
Arizona2006Title 36, Chapter 7, Article 3, Arizona Revised StatutesAriz. Rev. Stat. §§ 36-841-36-844
Arkansas2006Title 20, Subtitle 2, Chapter 17, Subchapter 12, Arkansas CodeArk. Code Ann. §§ 20-17-1201 to 20-17-1218
California2006California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 3.5Cal. Health & Saf. Code §§ 7150-7156.5
Colorado2006Title 15, Article 19, Part 2, Colorado Revised StatutesColo. Rev. Stat. §§ 15-19-201 to 15-19-223
Connecticut2010Title 19a, Chapter 368i, Connecticut General StatutesConn. Gen. Stat. §§ 19a-289 to 19a-289v
Delaware2015Title 16, Chapter 27, Subchapter II, Delaware CodeDel. Code tit. 16 § 2710-2731
District of Columbia (D.C.)1968Title 7, Subchapter II-A, D.C. CodeD.C. Code § 7-1531.01 to § 7-1531.22
Florida2008Chapter 765, Part V, Florida StatutesFS. §§ 765.510-765.547
Georgia2006Title 44, Chapter 5, Article 6, Georgia Code AnnotatedGa. Code Ann. §§ 44-5-143 to 44-5-153
Hawaii2006Title 19, Chapter 327, Part I, Hawaii Revised StatutesHRS §§ 327-3 to 327-11
Idaho2006Title 39, Chapter 34, Subchapter 34, Idaho CodeIdaho Code §§ 39-3401 to 39-3420
Illinois2006755 Illinois Compiled Statutes 50/Article 5755 ILCS 50/5-5 and 755 ILCS 50/5-20
Indiana2006Title 29, Article 2, Chapter 16.1, Indiana CodeInd. Code § 29-2-16.1-1 to § 29-2-16.1-14
Iowa2006Chapter 142C, Iowa CodeIowa Code § 142C.1 to § 142C.15
Kansas2006Article 32, Kansas StatutesKan. Stat. art. 32
Kentucky2006Title 26, Chapter 311, Kentucky Revised StatutesKy. Rev. Stat. §§ 311.1915-311.1931
Louisiana2006Title 17, Chapter 23, Part III, Louisiana Revised StatutesLa. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 17:2351-17:2359
Maine2006Title 22, Chapter 710-B, Maine Revised StatutesMe. Rev. Stat. tit. 22 § 2941 et seq.
Maryland2012Title 4, Subtitle 5, Maryland CodeMd. Code, Estates & Trusts § 4-501 to § 4-522
Massachusetts2006Chapter 113A, Massachusetts General LawsM.G.L. c. 113A §§ 1-13
Michigan2008Public Health Code, Article 10, Part 101, Michigan Compiled LawsMCL 333.10101 - 333.10123
Minnesota2006Chapter 525A, Minnesota StatutesMinn. Stat. § 525A.01 to 525A.21
Mississippi2006Title 41, Chapter 39, Mississippi CodeMiss. Code Ann. §§ 41-39-101 to 41-39-149
Missouri2006Chapter 194, Missouri Revised StatutesMo. Rev. Stat. §§ 194.210-194.290
Montana2006Title 72, Chapter 17, Montana Code AnnotatedMont. Code Ann. §§ 72-17-201 to 72-17-214
Nebraska2006Chapter 71, Article 48, Nebraska Revised StatutesNeb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-4834-71-4842
Nevada2006Chapter 451, Subchapter 5, Nevada Revised StatutesNRS §§ 451.500-451.571
New Hampshire2006Title 26, Chapter 291-A, New Hampshire Revised Statutes AnnotatedRSA 291-A:1-291-A:23
New Jersey2006Title 26, Chapter 6, New Jersey Revised StatutesN.J. Stat. Ann. § 26:6-77 et seq.
New Mexico2006Chapter 24, Article 6B, New Mexico Statutes AnnotatedN.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 24-6B-1 to 24-6B-23
New York1987Article 43, Public Health Law, New YorkN.Y. Pub. Health Law § 4300 et seq.
North Carolina2006Chapter 130A, Article 16, Part 3A, North Carolina General StatutesN.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 130A-412.4 to 130A-412.31
North Dakota2006Chapter 23-06.6, North Dakota Century CodeN.D.C.C. §§ 23-06.6-01 to 23-06.6-14
Ohio2006Chapter 2108, Human Bodies Or Parts Thereof, Ohio Revised CodeOhio Rev. Code §§ 2108.02-2108.35
Oklahoma2006Title 63, Chapter 46, Article 3, Oklahoma StatutesOkla. Stat. tit. 63 § 2200.1A - § 2200.18A
Oregon2013Chapter 97, Article 9, Oregon Revised StatutesOr. Rev. Stat. §§ 97.955-97.980
Pennsylvania1987Title 20, Chapter 86, Pennsylvania Consolidated StatutesPa. Cons. Stat. §§ 8611-
Puerto Rico2006Title 24, Chapter 150 of the Laws of Puerto Rico24 L.P.R.A. §§ 3620d-3620y
Rhode Island2006Chapter 23-18.6.1, Rhode IslandR.I. Gen. Laws § 23-18.6.1-9
South Carolina2006Title 44, Chapter 43, Article 14, South Carolina Code Ann.S.C. Code Ann. §§ 44-43-310 & 44-43-320 & 44-43-345
South Dakota2006Title 34, Chapter 26, Article 6, South Dakota Codified LawsS.D. Codified Laws §§ 34-26-51 to 34-26-59
Tennessee2006Title 68, Chapter 30, Part 1, Tennessee Code AnnotatedTenn. Code Ann. §§ 68-30-101 to 68-30-132
Texas2006Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 692ATex. Health & Saf. Code §§ 692A.001 - 692A.023
U.S. Virgin Islands2006Title 19, Chapter 20, US Virgin Islands CodeV.I. Code tit. 19, § 409
Utah2006Title 26b, Chapter 8, Part 3, Utah Code AnnotatedUtah Code Ann. §§ 26B-8-301 to 26B-8-320
Vermont2006Title 18, Chapter 110, Vermont Statutes AnnotatedVt. Stat. Ann. §§ 5250d-5250k
Virginia2006Title 32.1, Chapter 8, Article 2, Virginia CodeVa. Code §§ 32.1-291.1 to 32.1-291.23
Washington2006Chapter 70.08, Revised Code of WashingtonRCW §§ 70.08.010-70.08.900
West Virginia2008Title 16, Article 19, West Virginia CodeW. Va. Code §§ 16-19-11 to 16-19-33
Wisconsin2006Chapter 157, Wisconsin StatutesWis. Stat. § 157.06
Wyoming2006Title 35, Chapter 5, Article 2, Wyoming Statutes AnnotatedWyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 35-5-201 to 35-5-223

Ethical concerns

The UAGA does not specify regulations for organ donation by a prisoner or prohibit an inmate from donating their body or an organ. [4] Christian Longo, a convicted murderer, has played a key role in rousing public debate regarding the rights of the incarcerated to become organ donors.

The retrieval of gametes from the deceased have been the subject of controversy because of the highly publicized court case In re Matter of Daniel Thomas Christy in Iowa, regarding the right to retrieve reproductive cells (posthumous sperm retrieval) from a deceased spouse or partner. [11] The argument against the retrieval of post mortem gametes in this case was that the UAGA stated the purposes of donation were for transplantation, therapy, research, or education. [11]

Since the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was put into effect in all states, there still has been a donor shortage in the United States. [3] [9] [10]

Case law

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organ donation</span> Process of voluntarily giving away organs

Organ donation is the process when a person authorizes an organ of their own to be removed and transplanted to another person, legally, either by consent while the donor is alive, through a legal authorization for deceased donation made prior to death, or for deceased donations through the authorization by the legal next of kin.

<i>Body Worlds</i> Exhibition of plastinated bodies

Body Worlds is a traveling exposition of dissected human bodies, animals, and other anatomical structures of the body that have been preserved through the process of plastination. Gunther von Hagens developed the preservation process which "unite[s] subtle anatomy and modern polymer chemistry", in the late 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brain death</span> Permanent loss of brain function

Brain death is the permanent, irreversible, and complete loss of brain function which may include cessation of involuntary activity necessary to sustain life. It differs from persistent vegetative state, in which the person is alive and some autonomic functions remain. It is also distinct from comas as long as some brain and bodily activity and function remain, and it is also not the same as the condition locked-in syndrome. A differential diagnosis can medically distinguish these differing conditions.

Prior to the introduction of brain death into law in the mid to late 1970s, all organ transplants from cadaveric donors came from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs).

Eye banks recover, prepare and deliver donated eyes for cornea transplants and research. The first successful cornea transplant was performed in 1905 and the first eye bank was founded in 1944. Currently, in the United States, eye banks provide tissue for over 80,000 cornea transplants each year to treat conditions such as keratoconus and corneal scarring. In some cases, the white of the eye (sclera) is used to surgically repair recipient eyes. Unlike other organs and tissues, corneas are in adequate supply for transplants in the United States, and excess tissue is exported internationally, where there are shortages in many countries, due to greater demand and a less-developed eye banking infrastructure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Body donation</span> Gifts of bodies for research and education

Body donation, anatomical donation, or body bequest is the donation of a whole body after death for research and education. There is usually no cost to donate a body to science; donation programs will often provide a stipend and/or cover the cost of cremation or burial once a donated cadaver has served its purpose and is returned to the family for interment.

The Australian Organ Donor Register (AODR) is a government register, recording individuals who have agreed to donate organs and tissues in the event of their death. The register is operated by the Organ and Tissue Authority (OTA) and Services Australia through Medicare.

A tissue bank is an establishment that collects and recovers human cadaver tissue for the purposes of medical research, education and allograft transplantation. A tissue bank may also refer to a location where biomedical tissue is stored under cryogenic conditions and is generally used in a more clinical sense.

Posthumous sperm retrieval (PSR) is a procedure in which spermatozoa are collected from the testes of a human corpse after brain death. There has been significant debate over the ethics and legality of the procedure, and on the legal rights of the child and surviving parent if the gametes are used for impregnation.

Organ trade is the trading of human organs, tissues, or other body products, usually for transplantation. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), organ trade is a commercial transplantation where there is a profit, or transplantations that occur outside of national medical systems. There is a global need or demand for healthy body parts for transplantation, which exceeds the numbers available.

Many different major religious groups and denominations have varying views on organ donation of a deceased and live bodies, depending on their ideologies. Differing opinions can arise depending on if the death is categorized as brain death or cease of the heartbeat. It is important for doctors and health care providers to be knowledgeable about differentiating theological and cultural views on death and organ donations as nations are becoming more multicultural.

Several authors have used the terms organ gifting and "tissue gifting" to describe processes behind organ and tissue transfers that are not captured by more traditional terms such as donation and transplantation. The concept of "gift of life" in the U.S. refers to the fact that "transplantable organs must be given willingly, unselfishly, and anonymously, and any money that is exchanged is to be perceived as solely for operational costs, but never for the organs themselves". "Organ gifting" is proposed to contrast with organ commodification. The maintenance of a spirit of altruism in this context has been interpreted by some as a mechanism through which the economic relations behind organ/tissue production, distribution, and consumption can be disguised. Organ/tissue gifting differs from commodification in the sense that anonymity and social trust are emphasized to reduce the offer and request of monetary compensation. It is reasoned that the implementation of the gift-giving analogy to organ transactions shows greater respect for the diseased body, honors the donor, and transforms the transaction into a morally acceptable and desirable act that is borne out of voluntarism and altruism.

The Ontario Online Donor Registry is a website where Ontario residents, age 16 and older, can register their consent to be an organ and tissue donor. This registry was created to help ease questions and ambiguities with organ donor wishes. The virtual registry also increases Ontario donations with increased accessibility. The registration process can be done through beadonor.ca. Online donor registries have also become popular in the United States, where one can register through Donate Life America; Malaysia, registering through their National Transplant Registry; and Saudi Arabia, registering through the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation.

Organ donation in the United States prison population is the donation of biological tissues or organs from incarcerated individuals to living recipients in need of a transplantation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MOHAN Foundation</span>

MOHAN Foundation is a not-for-profit, registered non-government charity organisation in India that works in the field of deceased organ donation and transplantation. MOHAN is an acronym for Multi Organ Harvesting Aid Network. It has offices in Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai, Chandigarh, Nagpur, Jaipur and information centers at Kerala and Imphal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HIV Organ Policy Equity Act</span> US law

The HIV Organ Policy Equity Act is a law that modifies rules regarding organ donation between HIV-positive individuals. The law authorizes clinical research and the revision of rules about organ donation and transportation as a result of the research. Organs from HIV donors would only be going to individuals who are already HIV positive, but could lead to 600 additional organ transplants a year. The use of HIV-positive organs was previously a federal crime. This bill passed the United States Senate during the 113th United States Congress, and also passed the United States House of Representatives. It was signed into law as PL 113-51 by President Barack Obama on November 21, 2013.

Organ transplantation is a common theme in science fiction and horror fiction. Numerous horror movies feature the theme of transplanted body parts that are evil or give supernatural powers, with examples including Body Parts, Hands of a Stranger, and The Eye.

Organ donation is when a person gives their organs after they die to someone in need of new organs. Transplantation is the process of transplanting the organs donated into another person. This process extends the life expectancy of a person suffering from organ failure. The number of patients requiring organ transplants outweighs the number of donor organs available.

The current law in Ireland requires a potential donor to opt in to becoming an organ donor. However, it is ultimately up to their family to make the decision whether or not the person can donate their organs after they die.

Organ donation in India is regulated by the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. The law allows both deceased and living donors to donate their organs. It also identifies brain death as a form of death. The National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (NOTTO) functions as the apex body for activities of relating to procurement, allotment and distribution of organs in the country.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017). "Anatomical Gift Act (1987)". Uniform Law Commission. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017). "Anatomical Gift (1968)". Uniform Law Commission. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017). "Anatomical Gift Act (2006)". Uniform Law Commission. Archived from the original on 13 January 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  4. 1 2 3 Seals Bersinger, Amanda; Milot, Lisa (2016). "Posthumous Organ Donation as Prisoner Agency and Rehabilitation". DePaul Law Review. 65 (4): 1194–1234.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kielhorn, Kristi (2007–2008). "Giving life after death: the 2006 revision of the uniform anatomical gift act". Drake Law Review. 56 (3): 809–828 via HeinOnline.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Nwabueze, Remigius (2008). "Donated Organs, Property Rights and the Remedial Quagmire". Medical Law Review. 16 (2). Oxford University Press: 1–18. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn004. PMID   18413357.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Verheijde, Joseph; Rady, Mohamed; McGregor, Joan (2007). "The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): New challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities". Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2: 19. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-19 . PMC   2001294 . PMID   17850664 via NCBI.
  8. 1 2 3 4 "State Organ Donor Legislation". OrganDonor.Gov. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wilding Knope, Denay (2009–2010). "Over my dead body: how the albrecht decisions complicate the constitutional dilemma of due process & the dead". Toledo Law Review. 41: 169–211 via HeinOnline.
  10. 1 2 3 4 McIntosh, Ann (1990). "Regulating the "Gift of Life"-The 1987 Uniform Anatomical Gift Act". Washington Law Review. 65: 171–188 via HeinOnline.
  11. 1 2 Spielman, Bethany (2009). "Pushing the dead into the next reproductive frontier: post mortem gamete retrieval under the uniform anatomical gift act". Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 37 (2): 331–343. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00376.x. PMID   19493077. S2CID   35736419.