Unmitigated communion

Last updated
Unmitigated communion is frequently correlated with psychological problem Personality disorders.jpg
Unmitigated communion is frequently correlated with psychological problem

In psychology, unmitigated communion is focusing on others while excluding an individual's self. [1] It is opposed to unmitigated agency, which is focusing on self while excluding others. [2] Unmitigated communion is portrayed as a way of being concerned with others excessively and placing other human beings' needs or wants before one's own. [1] Unmitigated communion and unmitigated agency are also correlated with unusual behaviour and psychological problems. [2] [3]

Contents

Background and history

Unmitigated communion was first introduced by David Bakan in the year 1966. [1] Unmitigated communion originated from an analysis of two aspects of behaviour and personality: agency and communion. [4] Bakan defined communion as a focus on relationship or interrelation with others and a focus that more characterises women compared to men in the culture, whereas agency indicates the focus on an individual's self or autonomy. [1] It is believed that communion is referred to as a measure of psychological femininity. [5] However, it is claimed that now communion is perceived to reflect a particular part of female gender-related traits, a communal orientation. [1] Bakan (1996) had never explicitly pinpointed the construct of unmitigated communion, which was developed by other psychologists such as Vicki S. Helgeson and Heidi L. Fritz. [1] Nevertheless, Bakan believed that high levels of communion could be mitigated by a personal sense of agency. [1] Thus, the agency in the unmitigated communion is absolutely absent. [1] Unmitigated communion is different from communion as unmitigated communion is the exaggerated version of communion. [4] Communion can be viewed as a caring act toward other people in a positive way, whereas unmitigated communion can be seen as a psychological distress. [6] In addition, communion is associated with the belief that other individuals are valuable, while unmitigated communion is not affiliated with any good or bad view of others. [1]

Causes of unmitigated communion

A study from Carnegie Mellon University shows that there are four main causes of unmitigated communion behaviour which includes the way a person was raised, modelling of a family member especially mother, lack of self-esteem as well as genetics. [1] However, the most accurate and possible cause for unmitigated communion is the combination of genetics, which might be inherited from parents, and socialisation, where the environment and surroundings affect the way a person behaves. [1] For instance, poor and unsupportive family surroundings and social environment would lead to high unmitigated communion behaviour. [1] It is claimed that adolescents with high unmitigated communion would more likely to be raised in a family with less expressive parents. In addition, an individual with high unmitigated communion would tend to come from less cohesive family. [1]

Roles of unmitigated communion

Over-involvement with others

Over-involvement with others means that people with high unmitigated communion are too unreasonably involved in other people's problems and treat others' issues as their own. [4] Additionally, high unmitigated communion individuals tend to feel responsible for helping others and frequently have thoughts about other individuals' problems. [7] Therefore, the higher a person scores at unmitigated communion, the more frequent and common that person would be involved in others' problems and be affected. [4] In addition, an individual with strong unmitigated communion would tend to feel more stressful events eventuates[ clarification needed ]. [4] There are three ways to explain the over-involvement with others.

Caretaking

Caretaking refers to an action where individuals with unmitigated communion are more strongly correlated to support provision compared to communion[ clarification needed ]. [1] Therefore, individuals with high unmitigated communion would tend to exhibit "helping behaviours" in an extreme way. [1] In a study about adjustment to heart disease, couples who scored relatively high in unmitigated communion would be more likely to be overprotective with the other partner. [1] In addition, according to a study of college students and adults, unmitigated communion is associated with self-reports of interpersonal problems such as intrusive, overly nurturant, as well as self-sacrificing. [1]

Imbalanced relationship

An imbalanced relationship is a situation where individuals with high unmitigated communion would feel uncomfortable receiving support from others. [1] One reason for the imbalanced relationship is that individuals with unmitigated communion assume that not receiving any help from others could control over the relationship among friends. [1] Individuals characterised by unmitigated communion do not expect that others would support as they are afraid that others would not respond to the needs. [1] Therefore, unmitigated communion individuals would be more likely to drop the expectations to minimise any disappointment. [1] People with high unmitigated communion also feel that their problems should not burden others to avoid damage in the relationship. [1]

Motives for helping

The motives for helping are likely to be different for individuals with high unmitigated communion than for people with high communion. Although unmitigated communion and communion are similar as they are correlated with providing support and related to empathy, the motives are entirely different. Individuals with high communion would tend to help out others genuinely. [1] However, individuals who scored high on unmitigated communion would be more likely to help others in order to improve their self worth in front of others [1]

Neglect of the self

Individuals with high unmitigated communion are correlated with self-neglect indicators, which include being exploitable, difficulties in declaring one's needs, and hindering self-effacement from keeping away from conflict with others. [4] The higher an individual's score on unmitigated communion, the stronger the feeling of responsibility for others. [4] Thus, it would be less likely for them to prioritise themselves. [4]

Externalised self-evaluation

Externalised self-evaluation is defined as basing an individual's self-evaluation on what other people think. [8] It is believed that the mixture of both externalised self-evaluation and the belief of negative opinion from others would lead to low self-esteem as well as subsequent depressive symptoms. [4] For instance, in a relationship, a person who scored high in unmitigated communion would be more emotional than a person who scored lower. [4] Additionally, people with high unmitigated communion would more likely to evaluate themselves based on the other's opinions, and they would tend to be pessimistic if they cannot meet the society and others' opinions and expectations. [4]

Unmitigated communion in gender

Gender in the theory of unmitigated communion Couple at a wedding ceremony in Indonesia.jpg
Gender in the theory of unmitigated communion

In 1966, Bakan claimed that there are two modes of existence, which includes agency and communion. [9] Self-enhancement and self-assertion would be correlated with the agency, whereas society or group cooperation would be related to communion. [9] It is perceived that individual with the unmitigated agency would tend to isolate themselves from others, while unmitigated communion would exclude themselves for others. [9] From the gender perspectives, it is claimed that males would tend to be 'agentic' than females. [9] The existence of sex variance in communal and agentic could trigger conflicts between male and female. [9] For instance, a majority of females complained that they could not communicate their inner feelings with their partners, while most of the males complained that their partners are too emotional. [9] Moreover, males are associated with unmitigated agency whereas females would tend to be associated with unmitigated communion. [9] Therefore, males would more likely to be related to dominant acts which means males would prefer to control tasks individually. [9] This can be reflected that males would tend to be more individualistic than females. [9] Unlike males, female is reported to have higher chance of developing unmitigated communion. [9] Hence, it is probable that females are correlated with submissive acts. [9] This shows that females would tend to apologise repeatedly. [9] In addition, as females are likely to score high in unmitigated communion, thus females are more likely to be involved in relationship as well as socialise more than males. [9] Besides, females are also more expressive than males. The negative thinking and views of females would also lead to lower self confidence, hence this triggers higher unmitigated communion. Additionally, as women frequently make "internal attributions" for a particular event or tragedy, thus, when it comes to a failure in fulfilling others' needs or solving others' problem, women would tend to blame themselves which would reflect to higher unmitigated communion.

Direct implication to psychology

High unmitigated communion would lead to psychological distress. It is shown as a self-rating depression scale that was created by Zung, had shown that the higher the unmitigated communion the higher the depression level.[ citation needed ] To explain further about psychological distress, two types of psychological distress, general distress and situation-specific distress will be distinguished

General psychological distress

Psychological distress is correlated with unmitigated communion as this relates to a couple of interpersonal behaviour which includes, over-involvement with others as well as self neglect. [1] The psychological distress would cover anxiety and depression as the symptoms. [1] The psychological distress might occur in college students, adolescents, and even adults. [1] Unlike the unmitigated communion, people with high communion would not have a risk of psychological distress such as anxiety and depression. [1] Additionally, one factor of how unmitigated communion is related to psychological distress would be the absence of self-worth. [1] This is because the absence of self worth or self-esteem would be related to the depression and anxiety. [1] A study also reported that one of the main reason the high level of unmitigated communion would be negative-self view. [1]

Situation-specific distress

The over-involvement in other's problem would result in even further psychological distress, called situation-specific distress. [1] This eventuates as individuals with high unmitigated communion would tend to involve in as well as take care of others' problem, they would be more likely to gain exposure toward a particular stressful moment or event. [1] Hence, it is probable that they become distressed. [1] Additionally, a study from Carnegie Mellon University showed that unmitigated communion is affected by events of other people. [1] Unmitigated communion is also correlated with intrusive thoughts. [1] For example, when a friend or family are in a trouble people with high unmitigated communion are very likely to think repeatedly and focus on their problem which in turn could lead people with unmitigated communion to feel guilty for not helping them as they always think that it is their responsibility to help their family or friend.[ citation needed ] Therefore, an individual with high unmitigated communion would tend to be vulnerable toward a situation specific distress that would result from the existence of other people's problem. [1] The form of distress or suffering in situation specific distress would be greater compared to the generalised distress [1]

Implication and relation to other factors

Relation to physical health

Physical health can be impacted from the psychological distress. [1] As person with high unmitigated communion would tend to involve in others' problems. [1] Therefore, when they are not able to meet the others' need and problem is not solved, a person with high unmitigated communion would tend to suffer from variety of illnesses such as heart disease or diabetes. [1] For instance, the stress and depression from failure in meeting other people's need would lead individuals with high unmitigated communion have poor metabolic control such as poor control over blood glucose levels which could eventually result in diabetes. [1] In addition, the anxiety and depression that is caused by the unmitigated communion could lead humans to suffer from chronic diseases or illness such as cardiac diseases as well as breast cancer that more likely to attack women. [1] According to numerous empirical studies, people with high unmitigated communion would also likely to suffer from rheumatoid arthritis [ citation needed ]

Relation to disturbed eating disorder in adolescents

Eating disorder is correlated with unmitigated communion, especially in teenagers or adolescents. One reason of how both unmitigated communion and eating disorder are linked is because unmitigated communion could lead to low self-esteem. [3] Hence, the adolescent would be pressured to look more fit and skinny in front of their peers. [3] During adolescence, individuals with high unmitigated communion would tend to have overly other-focused behaviour; thus self-image from other people's perspective is tremendously essential. [3] As people with high unmitigated communion overly focus on others and how others view them, hence when they do not meet the criteria of being fit and skinny from the perspective of the peers, this would trigger bulimic symptoms such as feeling insecure of own body. [3]

Relation to economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining

Unmitigated communion is related to the economic cost in distributive and integrative bargaining. This is because unmitigated communion might apply in the business environment during business negotiations as it involves self-concern and relationship. [10] The objective of distributive bargaining is to gain a big portion of a certain pie of value, whereas the goal of integrative bargaining is to increase the size of the pie. In order to understand the consequence of unmitigated communion in negotiation, two conflict situations which includes distributive and integrative should be distinguished. [11] Distributive conflict is a few and simple issues that occur during negotiation. [12] While, integrative conflict is the issue that occurs in a complex business relationship. [10]

From the perspective of distributive bargaining, the consequences of unmitigated communion are not as complex as integrative bargaining individuals with high unmitigated communion would be more likely to agree on low monetary outcomes during business negotiations. [10] Besides, joint gains cannot be maximised in the integrative negotiation as relationship matter of unmitigated communion would hinder the negotiator. [10]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jealousy</span> Emotion

Jealousy generally refers to the thoughts or feelings of insecurity, fear, and concern over a relative lack of possessions or safety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breakup</span> Termination of an intimate relationship

A relationship breakup, breakup, or break-up is the termination of a relationship. The act is commonly termed "dumping [someone]" in slang when it is initiated by one partner. The term is less likely to be applied to a married couple, where a breakup is typically called a separation or divorce. When a couple engaged to be married breaks up, it is typically called a "broken engagement". People commonly think of breakups in a romantic aspect, however, there are also non-romantic and platonic breakups, and this type of relationship dissolution is usually caused by failure to maintain a friendship.

Conscientiousness is the personality trait of being careful or diligent. Conscientiousness implies a desire to do a task well, and to take obligations to others seriously. Conscientious people tend to be efficient and organized as opposed to easy-going and disorderly. They tend to show self-discipline, act dutifully, and aim for achievement; they display planned rather than spontaneous behavior; and they are generally dependable. Conscientiousness manifests in characteristic behaviors such as being neat, systematic, careful, thorough, and deliberate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Locus of control</span> Concept in psychology

Locus of control is the degree to which people believe that they, as opposed to external forces, have control over the outcome of events in their lives. The concept was developed by Julian B. Rotter in 1954, and has since become an aspect of personality psychology. A person's "locus" is conceptualized as internal or external.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual jealousy</span> Psychological concept

Sexual jealousy is a special form of jealousy in sexual relationships, based on suspected or imminent sexual infidelity. The concept is studied in the field of evolutionary psychology.

Self-criticism involves how an individual evaluates oneself. Self-criticism in psychology is typically studied and discussed as a negative personality trait in which a person has a disrupted self-identity. The opposite of self-criticism would be someone who has a coherent, comprehensive, and generally positive self-identity. Self-criticism is often associated with major depressive disorder. Some theorists define self-criticism as a mark of a certain type of depression, and in general people with depression tend to be more self critical than those without depression. People with depression are typically higher on self-criticism than people without depression, and even after depressive episodes they will continue to display self-critical personalities. Much of the scientific focus on self-criticism is because of its association with depression.

Social dominance orientation (SDO) is a personality trait measuring an individual's support for social hierarchy and the extent to which they desire their in-group be superior to out-groups. SDO is conceptualized under social dominance theory as a measure of individual differences in levels of group-based discrimination; that is, it is a measure of an individual's preference for hierarchy within any social system and the domination over lower-status groups. It is a predisposition toward anti-egalitarianism within and between groups.

Sociotropy is a personality trait characterized by excessive investment in interpersonal relationships and usually studied in the field of social psychology.

Caring in intimate relationships is the practice of providing care and support to an intimate relationship partner. Caregiving behaviours are aimed at reducing the partner's distress and supporting their coping efforts in situations of either threat or challenge. Caregiving may include emotional support and/or instrumental support. Effective caregiving behaviour enhances the care-recipient's psychological well-being, as well as the quality of the relationship between the caregiver and the care-recipient. However, certain suboptimal caregiving strategies may be either ineffective or even detrimental to coping.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interpersonal circumplex</span>

The interpersonal circle or interpersonal circumplex is a model for conceptualizing, organizing, and assessing interpersonal behavior, traits, and motives. The interpersonal circumplex is defined by two orthogonal axes: a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. In recent years, it has become conventional to identify the vertical and horizontal axes with the broad constructs of agency and communion. Thus, each point in the interpersonal circumplex space can be specified as a weighted combination of agency and communion.

In psychology, the theory of attachment can be applied to adult relationships including friendships, emotional affairs, adult romantic and carnal relationships, and, in some cases, relationships with inanimate objects. Attachment theory, initially studied in the 1960s and 1970s primarily in the context of children and parents, was extended to adult relationships in the late 1980s. The working models of children found in Bowlby's attachment theory form a pattern of interaction that is likely to continue influencing adult relationships.

In the study of psychology, neuroticism has been considered a fundamental personality trait. In the Big Five approach to personality trait theory, individuals with high scores for neuroticism are more likely than average to be moody and to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, pessimism, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness. Such people are thought to respond worse to stressors and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations, such as minor frustrations, as appearing hopelessly difficult. The responses can include maladaptive behaviors, such as dissociation, procrastination, substance use, etc., which aids in relieving the negative emotions and generating positive ones.

Agreeableness is a personality trait that manifests as behavior that is perceived as kind, sympathetic, cooperative, warm, frank, and considerate. In contemporary personality psychology, agreeableness is one of the five major dimensions of personality structure, reflecting individual differences in cooperation and social harmony.

Belongingness is the human emotional need to be an accepted member of a group. Whether it is family, friends, co-workers, a religion, or something else, some people tend to have an 'inherent' desire to belong and be an important part of something greater than themselves. This implies a relationship that is greater than simple acquaintance or familiarity.

Humor styles are a subject of research in the field of personality psychology that focuses on the ways in which individuals differ in their use of humor. People of all ages and cultures respond to humor, but their use of it can vary greatly. There are multiple factors, such as culture, age, and political orientation, that play a role in determining what people find humorous. Although humor styles can be somewhat variable depending on social context, they tend to be a relatively stable personality characteristic among individuals. Humor can play an instrumental role in the formation of social bonds, enabling people to relate to peers or to attract a mate, and can help to release tension during periods of stress. There is a lack of current, reliable research that explores the impact of humor usages on others because it is difficult to distinguish a healthy humor usage from one that is unhealthy. Justifications for harmful versus benign humor styles are subjective and lead to varying definitions of either usage.

Mate preferences in humans refers to why one human chooses or chooses not to mate with another human and their reasoning why. Men and women have been observed having different criteria as what makes a good or ideal mate. A potential mate's socioeconomic status has also been seen as having a noticeable effect, especially in developing areas where social status is more emphasized.

Most scientists agree that religiosity is not an independent personality trait, despite there being some commonality between their characteristics. Religiosity and personality traits both relate to one's feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. However, unlike for personality, one's level of religiosity is often measured by the presence or lack of belief in and relationship with a higher power, certain lifestyles or behaviors adopted for a higher power, and a sense of belonging with other followers of one's religion. Additionally, personality traits tend to follow a normal distribution, such that the majority of individuals' scores for a personality trait will be concentrated towards the middle, rather than being extremely high or low. Distributions for religiosity, however, follow a non-normal distribution, such that there are more individuals who score particularly high or low on religiosity scales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human mating strategies</span> Courtship behavior of humans

In evolutionary psychology and behavioral ecology, human mating strategies are a set of behaviors used by individuals to select, attract, and retain mates. Mating strategies overlap with reproductive strategies, which encompass a broader set of behaviors involving the timing of reproduction and the trade-off between quantity and quality of offspring.

Self-blame is a cognitive process in which an individual attributes the occurrence of a stressful event to oneself. The direction of blame often has implications for individuals’ emotions and behaviors during and following stressful situations. Self-blame is a common reaction to stressful events and has certain effects on how individuals adapt. Types of self-blame are hypothesized to contribute to depression, and self-blame is a component of self-directed emotions like guilt and self-disgust. Because of self-blame's commonality in response to stress and its role in emotion, self-blame should be examined using psychology's perspectives on stress and coping. This article will attempt to give an overview of the contemporary study on self-blame in psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Machiavellianism (psychology)</span> Psychological trait

In the field of personality psychology, Machiavellianism is a personality trait characterized by interpersonal manipulation, indifference to morality, lack of empathy, and a strategic focus on self-interest. Psychologists Richard Christie and Florence Geis named the trait after Niccolò Machiavelli, as they used edited and truncated statements inspired by his works to study variations in human behaviors. Their Mach IV test, a 20-question, Likert-scale personality survey, became the standard self-assessment tool and scale of the Machiavellianism construct. Those who score high on the scale are more likely to have a high level of deceitfulness and a cynical, unemotional temperament.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Helgeson, V. S.; Fritz, H. L. (1998). "A theory of unmitigated communion". Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2 (3): 173–183. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_2. ISSN   1088-8683. PMID   15647153. S2CID   22345920.
  2. 1 2 Helgeson, Vicki S.; Fritz, Heidi L. (December 2000). "The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior". Journal of Personality . 68 (6): 1031–1057. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00125 . PMID   11130731.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Helgeson, Vicki S.; Escobar, Oscar; Siminerio, Linda; Becker, Dorothy (April 2007). "Unmitigated communion and health among adolescents with and without diabetes: the mediating role of eating disturbances". Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 33 (4): 519–536. doi:10.1177/0146167206296953. ISSN   0146-1672. PMID   17400835. S2CID   34523220.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Jin, Lihua; Yperen, Nico W. Van; Sanderman, Robbert; Hagedoorn, Mariët (2010). "Depressive symptoms and unmitigated communion in support providers". European Journal of Personality. 24 (1): 56–70. doi:10.1002/per.741. ISSN   1099-0984. S2CID   53526846.
  5. Bem, S. L. (April 1974). "The measurement of psychological androgyny". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 42 (2): 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215. ISSN   0022-006X. PMID   4823550.
  6. Fritz, H. L.; Helgeson, V. S. (July 1998). "Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: self-neglect and overinvolvement with others". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75 (1): 121–140. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.121. ISSN   0022-3514. PMID   9686454.
  7. Aubé, Jennifer (February 2008). "Balancing concern for other with concern for self: links between unmitigated communion, communion, and psychological well-being". Journal of Personality. 76 (1): 101–133. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00481.x. ISSN   0022-3506. PMID   18186712.
  8. Jack, Dana Crowley; Dill, Diana (March 1992). "The Silencing the Self Scale: Schemas of Intimacy Associated With Depression in Women". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 16 (1): 97–106. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00242.x. ISSN   0361-6843. S2CID   143623106.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Buss, David M. (1990-05-01). "Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: An analysis of the negative components of masculinity and femininity" (PDF). Sex Roles. 22 (9): 555–568. doi:10.1007/BF00288234. hdl: 2027.42/45594 . ISSN   1573-2762. S2CID   145623645.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Amanatullah, Emily T.; Morris, Michael W.; Curhan, Jared R. (September 2008). "Negotiators who give too much: unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95 (3): 723–738. doi:10.1037/a0012612. ISSN   0022-3514. PMID   18729705. S2CID   15164296.
  11. "The Art and Science of Negotiation — Howard Raiffa | Harvard University Press". www.hup.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2019-05-16.
  12. "PsycNET". psycnet.apa.org. Retrieved 2019-05-16.