Uranium hydride bomb

Last updated

The uranium hydride bomb was a variant design of the atomic bomb first suggested by Robert Oppenheimer in 1939 and advocated and tested by Edward Teller. [1] It used deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen, as a neutron moderator in a uranium-deuterium ceramic compact. Unlike all other fission-bomb types, the concept relies on a chain reaction of slow nuclear fission (see neutron temperature). Bomb efficiency was harmed by the slowing of neutrons since the latter delays the reaction, as delineated by Rob Serber in his 1992 extension of the original Los Alamos Primer . [2]

Contents

The term hydride for this type of weapon has been subject to misunderstandings in the open literature. While "hydride" might imply that natural hydrogen (which is mostly 1H), is used; only deuterium (2H) has been used for the bomb pits. Likewise, a "hydrogen bomb" uses deuterium and occasionally tritium. [3]

Two uranium deuteride bombs are known to have been tested, the Ruth and Ray test shots during Operation Upshot–Knothole. Both tests produced a yield comparable to 200 tons of TNT each, and were considered to be fizzles. [1] [4] All other nuclear weapons programs have relied on fast neutrons in their weapons designs.

The mangled tower for the Ruth test. The explosion failed to level the testing tower, only somewhat damaging it. RUTH test tower 1953-03-31.jpg
The mangled tower for the Ruth test. The explosion failed to level the testing tower, only somewhat damaging it.

Theory

In early phases of Manhattan Project, in 1943, uranium deuteride [Note 1] was investigated as a promising bomb material; it was abandoned by early 1944 as it turned out such design would be inefficient. [5] The "autocatalytic" design that emerged from this early research was "Elmer", the discontinued radial-implosion Mark 2 weapon. It made use of uranium deuteride particles coated with paraffin (to reduce the pyrophoricity of UD3 aka U2H3) and boron-10 carbide (B4C) wax distributed uniformly throughout the solid core. [Note 2] A composite lead and B4C tamper was envisioned, with about 10.5 kg of active material (i.e. UD3) in one version, and a BeO tamper with 8.45 kg of active material in another. [3] : 260 

The deuterium in uranium deuteride (UD3) or plutonium deuteride (PuD3) moderates (slows down) the neutrons, thereby increasing the nuclear cross section for neutron absorption. The result should have been a lower required critical mass; reducing the amount of 235U or 239Pu needed. [6] At the same time, due to the moderating effect of deuterium, [2] the compression requirements are (at least in principle) relaxed somewhat, which would permit assembly of additional fissile material in the core, as well as a radial-implosion assembly, which was much simpler and compact than the one destined for the MK 3. [3] : 258  In reality the result was that the slower neutrons delayed the reaction time too much by reducing the number of fission generations accomplished; especially as the core expanded to reach its snowplow region (where all nuclear reactions cease), more neutrons could escape from the turbulent surface of the core, and before enough energy (for military applications) could be produced. In all, neutron moderation sharply reduced the efficiency of the weapon before the inertial confinement failed. [6] [2] It was realized that the result would be a fizzle instead of full-scale detonation. The predicted yield was around 1 kilotonne of TNT (4.2 TJ), [7] if the core operated as originally expected; the first rough estimate for the behavior of the "hydride" bomb appeared in 1944, when James Conant forecast that 1 kt of energy would be obtained from about 9 kg of UD3. [8]

Post-war, LANL physicists continued research on the subject at low priority; while a Monte-Carlo simulation in December 1949 [3] : 258  showed that the core could in principle work and result in a weapon considerably smaller than the MK 5, strong skepticism arose as the inherently low efficiency of the fuel would not improve even remotely as theoretically envisioned when a hollow core and boosting were incorporated, and a proposed test of such a core in an MK 4 high-explosive assembly was ultimately stricken from the preliminary shot schedule of operation Greenhouse. [3] : 259 

A cartoon by George Gamow showing the MK 2 "Elmer" and the MK 8 "Elsie" weapons, depicting the MK 2 (the "good fellow") as clumsy and unattractive. Gamow-Elsie-and-Elmer.jpg
A cartoon by George Gamow showing the MK 2 "Elmer" and the MK 8 "Elsie" weapons, depicting the MK 2 (the "good fellow") as clumsy and unattractive.

UCRL tests

Film of the Ruth detonation.

Skepticism from Los Alamos notwithstanding, Edward Teller remained interested in the concept, and he and Ernest Lawrence experimented with such devices in the early 1950s at the UCRL, (University of California Radiation Laboratory, later Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory). Optimism in the new lab prompted UCRL to even propose a class of such "small weapons" making use of the material, dubbing it as the "Geode". The "Geode"-type devices would be compact, linear (two-point) implosion, gas-boosted fission weapons using hollow spheroidal metallic uranium, or partially ("slightly") moderated cores, where a metallic uranium or plutonium shell was lined internally with UD3 [Note 3] producing yields of the order of 10 kt. Applications for this class of devices would be tactical nuclear weapons, as well as primaries for compact thermonuclear systems. [1] The "Geodes" were essentially forerunners of the "Swan" and its derivatives (like the "Swift" and "Swallow" devices). [Note 4] [9] : 6 

Two test devices were fielded in 1953 as part of operation Upshot–Knothole. The principal aim of the University of California Radiation Laboratory designs was a preliminary [10] : 202 nucleonics investigation for a spherical deuterated polyethylene charge containing uranium deuteride [11] : chap 15  as a candidate thermonuclear fuel for the "Radiator", an early incarnation of the "Morgenstern". [10] : 203  It was hoped that deuterium would fuse (become an active medium) in the secondary's core if compressed appropriately through radiation implosion. The fuel was selected so that UCRL's thermonuclear program would not compete with LASL's on scarce materials at the time, specifically lithium. [Note 5] [10] : 24  If successful, the devices could also lead to a compact primary containing minimal amount of fissile material, and powerful enough to ignite Ramrod [10] : 149  the other Mark 22 nuclear bomb prototype designed by UCRL at the time. For a hydride-type primary, the degree of compression would not make deuterium to fuse, thus the design would be essentially a pure fission weapon, not a boosted one. [3] : 258  The devices themselves as tested in Upshot-Knothole were experimental systems, not weapon prototypes, and were not designed to be used as weapons, or thermonuclear primaries. [10] : 202  The cores consisted of a mix of uranium deuteride (UD3), [10] : 202  powder-compacted with deuterated polyethylene. No boron was used. The cores tested in Upshot-Knothole used different "mix" (or enrichment) of uranium moderated by deuterium. [3] : 260  The predicted yield was 1.5 to 3 kt for Ruth (with a maximum potential yield of 20 kt [12] : 96 ) and 0.5-1 kt for Ray. The tests produced yields of about 200 tons of TNT each; both tests were considered to be fizzles. [13]

Ruth, which used deuterium and enriched uranium in a solid spherical pit with a natural uranium tamper, was the first device almost-entirely designed at Livermore; it was fired on March 31, 1953, at 05:00 local time (13:00 GMT) at Mercury, Nevada. The explosive device, "Hydride I", [Note 6] used a MK-6 HE assembly made of Composition B and Baratol explosive lenses, [12] : 198  and an XMC-305 betatron was provided for initiation through photofission, [12] : 96  weighed 7,400 lb (3,400 kg) and was 56 inches (140 cm) in diameter and 66 inches (170 cm) long. The nuclear system weighed 6,750 lb (3,060 kg). Defying the 1.5–3 kt predictions, its actual yield was only 200 tons. Wally Decker, a young Laboratory engineer, characterized the sound the shot made as "pop." The device failed to "automatically declassify" its test site, where the lower 100 ft (30 m) of the 300-foot (91 m) testing tower remained intact, the middle third scattered across the test area and only the upper third vaporized. [13]

The second device, tested in the Ray event, used deuterium and a different concentration of enriched uranium in its solid spherical pit. [12] : 98  The device was called "Hydride II", [Note 7] and it also used a MK-6 HE assembly [12] : 198 ; it was likewise initiated by an XMC-305 betatron fired at known time. [12] : 96  Being a sister device to "Hydride I", the "Hydride II" device only had a different pit "fuel" mix, and shared the same dimensions and weight with the Ruth test device. [12] : 96  It was fired in a cab, atop a 100-foot (30 m) tower on April 11, 1953. Although shot Ray leveled its tower, the yield was a meager 220 tons; [15] : 101  while it did better than Ruth, the yield was still about a tenth of the predicted 0.5–1 kt value.

Related Research Articles

A neutron bomb, officially defined as a type of enhanced radiation weapon (ERW), is a low-yield thermonuclear weapon designed to maximize lethal neutron radiation in the immediate vicinity of the blast while minimizing the physical power of the blast itself. The neutron release generated by a nuclear fusion reaction is intentionally allowed to escape the weapon, rather than being absorbed by its other components. The neutron burst, which is used as the primary destructive action of the warhead, is able to penetrate enemy armor more effectively than a conventional warhead, thus making it more lethal as a tactical weapon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon design</span> Process by which nuclear WMDs are designed and produced

Nuclear weapon designs are physical, chemical, and engineering arrangements that cause the physics package of a nuclear weapon to detonate. There are three existing basic design types:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neutron moderator</span> Substance that slows down particles with no electric charge

In nuclear engineering, a neutron moderator is a medium that reduces the speed of fast neutrons, ideally without capturing any, leaving them as thermal neutrons with only minimal (thermal) kinetic energy. These thermal neutrons are immensely more susceptible than fast neutrons to propagate a nuclear chain reaction of uranium-235 or other fissile isotope by colliding with their atomic nucleus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Castle</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Castle was a United States series of high-yield (high-energy) nuclear tests by Joint Task Force 7 (JTF-7) at Bikini Atoll beginning in March 1954. It followed Operation Upshot–Knothole and preceded Operation Teapot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Greenhouse</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Greenhouse was the fifth American nuclear test series, the second conducted in 1951 and the first to test principles that would lead to developing thermonuclear weapons. Conducted at the new Pacific Proving Ground, on islands of the Enewetak Atoll, it mounted the devices on large steel towers to simulate air bursts. This series of nuclear weapons tests was preceded by Operation Ranger and succeeded by Operation Buster-Jangle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Upshot–Knothole</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Upshot–Knothole was a series of eleven nuclear test shots conducted in 1953 at the Nevada Test Site. It followed Operation Ivy and preceded Operation Castle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ivy King</span> Largest pure-fission US nuclear bomb test

Ivy King was the largest pure-fission nuclear bomb ever tested by the United States. The bomb was tested during the Truman administration as part of Operation Ivy. This series of tests involved the development of very powerful nuclear weapons in response to the nuclear weapons program of the Soviet Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Castle Bravo</span> 1954 U.S. thermonuclear weapon test in the Marshall Islands

Castle Bravo was the first in a series of high-yield thermonuclear weapon design tests conducted by the United States at Bikini Atoll, Marshall Islands, as part of Operation Castle. Detonated on March 1, 1954, the device remains the most powerful nuclear device ever detonated by the United States and the first lithium deuteride-fueled thermonuclear weapon tested using the Teller-Ulam design. Castle Bravo's yield was 15 megatons of TNT [Mt] (63 PJ), 2.5 times the predicted 6 Mt (25 PJ), due to unforeseen additional reactions involving lithium-7, which led to radioactive contamination in the surrounding area.

RDS-6s was the first Soviet test of a thermonuclear weapon that occurred on August 12, 1953, that detonated with a force equivalent to 400 kilotons of TNT.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boosted fission weapon</span> Type of nuclear weapon

A boosted fission weapon usually refers to a type of nuclear bomb that uses a small amount of fusion fuel to increase the rate, and thus yield, of a fission reaction. The neutrons released by the fusion reactions add to the neutrons released due to fission, allowing for more neutron-induced fission reactions to take place. The rate of fission is thereby greatly increased such that much more of the fissile material is able to undergo fission before the core explosively disassembles. The fusion process itself adds only a small amount of energy to the process, perhaps 1%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Castle Romeo</span> Codename for one of the first thermonuclear bomb tests

Castle Romeo was the code name given to one of the tests in the Operation Castle series of U.S. nuclear tests. It was the first test of the TX-17 thermonuclear weapon, the first deployed thermonuclear bomb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermonuclear weapon</span> 2-stage nuclear weapon

A thermonuclear weapon, fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb (H bomb) is a second-generation nuclear weapon design. Its greater sophistication affords it vastly greater destructive power than first-generation nuclear bombs, a more compact size, a lower mass, or a combination of these benefits. Characteristics of nuclear fusion reactions make possible the use of non-fissile depleted uranium as the weapon's main fuel, thus allowing more efficient use of scarce fissile material such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239. The first full-scale thermonuclear test was carried out by the United States in 1952 and the concept has since been employed by most of the world's nuclear powers in the design of their weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon yield</span> Energy released in nuclear weapons explosions

The explosive yield of a nuclear weapon is the amount of energy released such as blast, thermal, and nuclear radiation, when that particular nuclear weapon is detonated, usually expressed as a TNT equivalent (the standardized equivalent mass of trinitrotoluene which, if detonated, would produce the same energy discharge), either in kilotonnes (kt—thousands of tonnes of TNT), in megatonnes (Mt—millions of tonnes of TNT), or sometimes in terajoules (TJ). An explosive yield of one terajoule is equal to 0.239 kilotonnes of TNT. Because the accuracy of any measurement of the energy released by TNT has always been problematic, the conventional definition is that one kilotonne of TNT is held simply to be equivalent to 1012 calories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark 18 nuclear bomb</span> American nuclear bomb design

The Mark 18 nuclear bomb, also known as the SOB or Super Oralloy Bomb, was an American nuclear bomb design which was the highest yield fission bomb produced by the US. The Mark 18 had a design yield of 500 kilotons. Nuclear weapon designer Ted Taylor was the lead designer for the Mark 18.

Violet Club was a nuclear weapon deployed by the United Kingdom during the Cold War. It was Britain's first operational "high-yield" weapon and was intended to provide an emergency capability until a thermonuclear weapon could be developed from the 1956–1958 Operation Grapple tests. Violet Club was ultimately replaced in service by the Red Snow warhead, derived from the US W28 warhead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orange Herald</span> British nuclear weapons

Orange Herald was a British nuclear weapon, tested on 31 May 1957. At the time it was reported as an H-bomb, although in fact it was a large boosted fission weapon and remains to date, the largest fission device ever detonated.

The Mark 13 nuclear bomb and its variant, the W-13 nuclear warhead for Redstone BM and Snark CM, were experimental nuclear weapons developed by the United States from 1951 to 1954. The Mark 13 design was based on the earlier Mark 6 nuclear bomb design, which was in turn based on the Mark 4 nuclear bomb and the Mark 3 nuclear bomb used at the end of World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fizzle (nuclear explosion)</span> Nuclear explosion with less than expected yield

A fizzle occurs when the detonation of a device for creating a nuclear explosion grossly fails to meet its expected yield. The bombs still detonate, but the detonation is much less than anticipated. The cause(s) for the failure can be linked to improper design, poor construction, or lack of expertise. All countries that have had a nuclear weapons testing program have experienced some fizzles. A fizzle can spread radioactive material throughout the surrounding area, involve a partial fission reaction of the fissile material, or both. For practical purposes, a fizzle can still have considerable explosive yield when compared to conventional weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrogen-moderated self-regulating nuclear power module</span>

The hydrogen-moderated self-regulating nuclear power module (HPM), also referred to as the compact self-regulating transportable reactor (ComStar), is a type of nuclear power reactor using hydride as a neutron moderator. The design is inherently safe, as the fuel and the neutron moderator is uranium hydride UH3, which is reduced at high temperatures (500–800 °C) to uranium and hydrogen. The gaseous hydrogen exits the core, being absorbed by hydrogen absorbing material such as depleted uranium, thus making it less critical. This means that with rising temperature the neutron moderation drops and the nuclear fission reaction in the core is dampened, leading to a lower core temperature. This means as more energy is taken out of the core the moderation rises and the fission process is stoked to produce more heat.

A tamper is an optional layer of dense material surrounding the fissile material. It is used in nuclear weapon design to reduce the critical mass of a nuclear weapon and to delay the expansion of the reacting material through its inertia. Due to its inertia it delays the thermal expansion of the fissioning fuel mass, keeping it supercritical longer. Often the same layer serves both as tamper and as neutron reflector. The weapon disintegrates as the reaction proceeds and this stops the reaction, so the use of a tamper makes for a longer-lasting, more energetic and more efficient explosion. The yield can be further enhanced using a fissionable tamper.

References

Notes
  1. ↑ The unclassified name was "Manticore" as seen from Francis, Warhead Politics.
  2. ↑ The distribution of boron-10 was apparently more useful, [3] : 260  and it did away with the earlier and cumbersome "Boron Bubble" scheme. [2]
  3. ↑ hence the name geodes, which usually consist of spheroidal cavities lined internally with crystals. [9] : 213 
  4. ↑ The names of the devices all followed the initials of Small Weapons. [9] : 50 
  5. ↑ The idea of cheap thermonuclear fuels was pursued by UCRL with the design of the "Water Boiler", a primitive type of two-stage thermonuclear gadgets and an early design concept of the "Radiator", that would use heavy water solutions of uranyl fluoride. They were essentially transferred from LASL to UCRL and follow-up investigations to experiments from 1952 conducted in LASL on behalf of Teller, and shortly before the latter's departure from LASL to the newly fledged UCRL. [10] : 207 
  6. ↑ The unclassified name was "Basilisk I" as seen from Francis, Warhead Politics. [14]
  7. ↑ The unclassified name was "Basilisk II" as seen from Francis, Warhead Politics.
Citations
  1. 1 2 3 Operation Upshot-Knothole
  2. 1 2 3 4 Serber, Robert (1992). The Los Alamos Primer: The First Lectures on How To Build an Atomic Bomb.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hansen, Chuck (1995). Swords of Armageddon. Vol. I. Retrieved 2016-12-28.
  4. ↑ W48 - globalsecurity.org
  5. ↑ Moore, Mike (July 1994). "Lying well". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 50 (4): 2. Bibcode:1994BuAtS..50d...2M. doi:10.1080/00963402.1994.11456528 . Retrieved 2010-02-07.
  6. 1 2 Hoddeson, Lillian; Paul W. Henriksen; et al. (2004). Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943-1945 (Google Books). Cambridge University Press. ISBN   0-521-54117-4 . Retrieved December 15, 2008.
  7. ↑ Operation Upshot-Knothole (Nuclear Weapon Archive)
  8. ↑ Conant, James (1944). Findings to Trip to L.A. 1944.
  9. 1 2 3 Hansen, Chuck (1995). Swords of Armageddon. Vol. IV. Retrieved 2016-12-28.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Hansen, Chuck (1995). Swords of Armageddon. Vol. III. Retrieved 2016-12-28.
  11. ↑ Herken, Gregg (2003). Brotherhood of the Bomb .
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Hansen, Chuck (1995). Swords of Armageddon. Vol. VII. Retrieved 2016-12-28.
  13. 1 2 Carey Sublette. "Operation Upshot-Knothole 1953 - Nevada Proving Ground." Nuclear Weapon Archive. Retrieved on 2008-05-04.
  14. ↑ page 2 of archive listing of pdfs. Page 69 of warhead politics.
  15. ↑ Operation Upshot-Knothole Summary Report of the Technical Director. 1953. Retrieved 2019-02-17.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.