Voter fatigue

Last updated

In political science, voter fatigue is a cause of voter abstention which result from the electorates of representative democracies being asked to vote often, on too many issues or without easy access to relevant information. [1] Voter fatigue can be a symptom of efforts that make voting more difficult that some describe as voter suppression, which changes the voting rules and environment in such a way that turnout decreases as the cost of voting increases.

Contents

Causes

According to the traditional understanding of the concept, voter fatigue arises when citizens are asked to vote frequently or fill out lengthy ballots. [2] [3] [4] [5] Voter fatigue can be contributed to by a psychological phenomenon known as decision fatigue. As this suggests, our brain becomes mentally fatigued after making numerous decisions, so it will attempt to make shortcuts to decrease the workload. As decision fatigue increases, more voters abstain. [6] This can result in lower voter turnout rates. [3]

The process of voting can also be confusing or challenging. In the U.S., the Cost of Voting Index estimates how difficult it is to vote (and register to vote) in each state. [7] [8] The index doesn't include other challenges like voter roll purges [9] or such if signature verification standards are so strict that they throw out many more valid votes than invalid ones, with some states requiring residents to 'cure' their ballots by re-signing. [10] [11] [12]

Combating voter fatigue

Some of the methods proposed to combat voter fatigue include:

Examples

In the run-up to the 2019 UK General Election, it was suggested by some media outlets that the electorate might be altered by abstention from voter fatigue from the third General Election in little over 4 years, having seen one in 2015 and the snap election of 2017, either side of the 2016 EU Membership Referendum. [18]

In Israel, five snap elections from 2019-2022 has led to concerns about voter fatigue. [19]

Amid the 2021–present Bulgarian political crisis, reports by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, [20] Balkan Insight , [21] and Euronews [22] described the voter fatigue faced by Bulgarian voters having to vote six times in three years.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plurality voting</span> Type of electoral system

Plurality voting refers to electoral systems in which the candidates in an electoral district who poll more than any other are elected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compulsory voting</span> Practice of requiring all eligible citizens to register and vote in elections

Compulsory voting, also called universal civic duty voting or mandatory voting, is the requirement that registered voters participate in an election. As of January 2023, 21 countries have compulsory voting laws. Law enforcement in those countries varies considerably and the penalty for not casting a ballot without a proper justification ranges from severe to non-existent.

Electronic voting is voting that uses electronic means to either aid or take care of casting and counting ballots including voting time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protest vote</span> Vote cast in an election as a form of political protest

A protest vote is a vote cast in an election to demonstrate dissatisfaction with the choice of candidates or the current political system. Protest voting takes a variety of forms and reflects numerous voter motivations, including political apathy. Where voting is compulsory, casting a blank vote is available for those who do not wish to choose a candidate, or to protest. Unlike abstention elsewhere, blank votes are counted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter turnout</span> Percentage of a countrys eligible voters who actually vote within elections

In political science, voter turnout is the participation rate of a given election. This is typically either the percentage of registered voters, eligible voters, or all voting-age people. According to Stanford University political scientists Adam Bonica and Michael McFaul, there is a consensus among political scientists that "democracies perform better when more people vote."

Direct election is a system of choosing political officeholders in which the voters directly cast ballots for the persons or political party that they wanted to see elected. The method by which the winner or winners of a direct election are chosen depends upon the electoral system used. The most commonly used systems are the plurality system and the two-round system for single-winner elections, such as a presidential election, and proportional representation for the election of a legislature or executive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression</span> Strategy designed to restrict specific groups of people from voting

Voter suppression are tactics used to discourage or prevent specific groups of people from voting or registering to vote. It is distinguished from political campaigning in that campaigning attempts to change likely voting behavior by changing the opinions of potential voters through persuasion and organization, activating otherwise inactive voters, or registering new supporters. Voter suppression, instead, attempts to gain an advantage by reducing the turnout of certain voters. Suppression is an anti-democratic tactic associated with authoritarianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Egypt</span>

Elections in Egypt are held for the president and a bicameral legislature. The president of Egypt is elected for a six-year term by popular vote after draft amendments to the 2013 constitution altered the presidential term limits from the original four years to six years.

An uncontested election is an election in which the winning candidate did not face a serious challenger. This often entails the number of candidates being the same as or fewer than the number of places available for election, meaning that all candidates are guaranteed to be elected unless there are provisions provided for this. For example, in some election systems, absence of opposing candidates may not guarantee victory; possible factors are a quorum or minimum voter turnout; a none of the above option; or the availability of write-in candidates on the ballot. In some uncontested elections, the normal process of voters casting ballots and election official counting votes is cancelled as superfluous and costly; in other cases the election proceeds as a formality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter registration in the United States</span> Requirement for most elections in the United States of America

All U.S. states and territories, except North Dakota, require voter registration by eligible citizens before they can vote in federal, state and local elections. In North Dakota, cities in the state may register voters for city elections, and in other cases voters must provide identification and proof of entitlement to vote at the polling place before being permitted to vote. Voter registration takes place at the county level in many states or at the municipal level in several states. Many states set cutoff dates for registration or to update details, ranging from two to four weeks before an election, while 25 states and Washington, D.C. have same-day voter registration, which enables eligible citizens to register or update their registration on the same day they cast their vote. In states that permit early voting, and have voter registration, the prospective voter must be registered before casting a vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paradox of voting</span> Paradox of the expected benefit of voting

The paradox of voting, also called Downs' paradox, is that for a rational and egoistic voter, the costs of voting will normally exceed the expected benefits. Because the chance of exercising the pivotal vote is minuscule compared to any realistic estimate of the private individual benefits of the different possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting are less than the costs. Responses to the paradox have included the view that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than affect the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some degree of altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting besides the resulting electoral outcome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1987 Turkish general election</span>

General elections were held in Turkey on 29 November 1987. Prior to the elections, the military junta's restrictions on former politicians were lifted, allowing them to re-enter politics. However, only three political parties were approved by the junta to participate in the election. Despite a reduction in its share of the vote, the Motherland Party retained its majority in parliament, gaining 81 seats. Voter turnout was 93.3%.

Youth suffrage is the right to vote for young people. It forms part of the broader universal suffrage and youth rights movements. Most democracies have lowered the voting age to between 16 and 18, while some advocates for children's suffrage hope to remove age restrictions entirely.

In political science, political apathy is a lack of interest or apathy towards politics. This includes voter apathy, information apathy and lack of interest in elections, political events, public meetings, and voting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter turnout in United States presidential elections</span> Aspect of election history

Voter turnout in US elections is the total number of votes cast by the voting age population (VAP), or more recently, the voting eligible population (VEP), divided by the entire voting eligible population. It is usually displayed as a percentage, showing which percentage of eligible voters actually voted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1993 Venezuelan general election</span>

General elections were held in Venezuela on 5 December 1993. The presidential elections were won by former president Rafael Caldera of National Convergence, who received 30% of the vote. Democratic Action remained the largest party in the Chamber of Deputies and Senate, which were elected on separate ballots for the first time. Voter turnout was 60%, the lowest since World War II.

Clientelism or client politics is the exchange of goods and services for political support, often involving an implicit or explicit quid-pro-quo. It is closely related to patronage politics and vote buying.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter turnout in the European Parliament elections</span>

Elections to the European Parliament saw declining voter turnout between 1979 and 2014. However, voter turnout in 2019 European elections increased by 8 points compared to 2014. In spite of this exception for all Member States, the electoral mobilization remains weak compared to the national parliamentary elections. Moreover, turnout significantly differs from one country to another in Europe and across a time: in 2019 Belgium citizens participated the most with 88.47% and Slovaks the least with 22.74%. The potential factors that might influence these trends and their implications have attracted great scholarly attention. Identifying and analysing the factors that determine the relative low turnout at European elections is therefore critical, as it is one element that weakens the democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament.

The Cost of Voting Index measures and ranks how difficult it is to vote in each state in the United States, focusing on voter registration and voting rules. The index also has rankings for every two years since 1996. The states ranked as being easier to vote also tend to have higher voter turnout.

The ballot order effect refers to the effect of voting behavior based on the placement of candidates’ names on an election ballot. Candidates who are listed first often receive a small but statistically significant increase in votes compared to those listed in lower positions. This effect is typically more noticeable in nonpartisan or low information elections.

References

  1. 1 2 Kostelka, Filip; Krejcova, Eva; Sauger, Nicolas; Wuttke, Alexander (1 June 2023). "Election Frequency and Voter Turnout" (PDF). Comparative Political Studies. doi:10.1177/00104140231169020. S2CID   259062350.
  2. Seib, J. Drew (1 September 2016). "Coping with lengthy ballots". Electoral Studies. 43: 115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.011 . ISSN   0261-3794.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Demsas, Jerusalem (21 August 2023). "Americans Vote Too Much". The Atlantic. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
  4. Garmann, Sebastian (March 2017). "Election frequency, choice fatigue, and voter turnout". European Journal of Political Economy. 47: 19–35. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.12.003.
  5. Rallings, C.; Thrasher, M.; Borisyuk, G. (March 2003). "Seasonal factors, voter fatigue and the costs of voting". Electoral Studies. 22 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00047-6.
  6. Augenblick, Ned; Nicholson, Scott (December 2015). "Ballot Position, Choice Fatigue, and Voter Behaviour". The Review of Economic Studies. 83 (2): 460–480. doi:10.1093/restud/rdv047. hdl: 10.1093/restud/rdv047 . ISSN   0034-6527.
  7. Schraufnagel, Scot; Pomante, Michael J.; Li, Quan (1 September 2022). "Cost of Voting in the American States: 2022*". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 21 (3): 220–228. doi: 10.1089/elj.2022.0041 . ISSN   1533-1296.
  8. Corasaniti, Nick; McCann, Allison (20 September 2022). "The 'Cost' of Voting in America: A Look at Where It's Easiest and Hardest". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  9. "Voter Purges | Brennan Center for Justice". www.brennancenter.org. 20 July 2018. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
  10. Litt, David (2020). Democracy in one book or less: how it works, why it doesn't, and why fixing it is easier than you think (First ed.). New York, NY. ISBN   978-0-06-287936-3. OCLC   1120147424.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  11. Graham, David A. (21 October 2020). "Signed, Sealed, Delivered—Then Discarded". The Atlantic. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
  12. Justin Levitt, Wendy R. Weiser, and Ana Muñoz (24 March 2006). "Making the List: Database Matching and Verification Processes for Voter Registration" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. Hersh, Eitan (3 November 2015). "How Democrats Suppress The Vote". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
  14. Anzia, Sarah F. (1 April 2011). "Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups". The Journal of Politics. 73 (2): 412–427. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000028. ISSN   0022-3816.
  15. Anthony, Andrew (18 July 2016). "Against Elections: The Case for Democracy by David Van Reybrouck – review". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 21 September 2023.
  16. Ali, Shirin (28 September 2022). "These are the most difficult states to vote in". The Hill. Retrieved 6 January 2023.
  17. Rusch, Elizabeth (2020). You call this democracy? : how to fix our government and deliver power to the people. Boston. ISBN   978-0-358-17692-3. OCLC   1124772479.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  18. Proctor, Katie (26 October 2019). "Voters' disillusionment renders expected election tough to call". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 17 December 2019.
  19. Kavaler, Tara (23 March 2021). "A Quiet Election Day in Israel as Voter Fatigue Dampens Turnout". The Media Line. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
  20. "Despite free and competitive voting, Bulgaria's elections marred by voter fatigue, record low turnout". Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe. 10 June 2024. Retrieved 1 October 2024.
  21. Todorov, Svestoslav (5 August 2024). "Bulgaria Heads to Seventh Election Amid Voter Fatigue". Balkan Insight. Retrieved 1 October 2024.
  22. Skujins, Angela (13 June 2024). "Yet another election in Bulgaria sparks more political soul-searching". euronews. AP. Retrieved 1 October 2024.