Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011

Last updated

Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
  • An act to establish a mechanism to receive complaints relating to disclosure on any allegation of corruption or wilful misuse of power or wilful misuse of discretion against any public servant and to inquire or cause an inquiry into such disclosure and to provide adequate safeguards against victimisation of the person making such complaint and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.
Citation Act No. 17 of 2014
Enacted by Parliament of India
Assented to9 May 2014 (2014-05-09)
Status: In force

Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011 (renamed as Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014 by the second schedule of the Repealing and Amending Act, 2015 [1] ) is an Act of the Parliament of India which provides a mechanism to investigate alleged corruption and misuse of power by public servants and also protect anyone who exposes alleged wrongdoing in government bodies, projects and offices. The wrongdoing might be in the form of fraud, corruption or mismanagement. The Act will also ensure punishment for false or frivolous complaints. [2]

Contents

The Act was approved by the Cabinet of India as part of a drive to eliminate corruption in the country's bureaucracy [3] [4] and passed by the Lok Sabha on 27 December 2011. [5] The Bill was passed by Rajya Sabha on 21 February 2014 and received the President's assent on 9 May 2014. [6] [7]

Intent

An Act to establish a mechanism to receive complaints relating to disclosure on any allegation of corruption or willful misuse of power or willful misuse of discretion against any public servant and to inquire or cause an inquiry into such disclosure and to provide adequate safeguards against victimization of the person making such complaint and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.

Salient Features

Background

There have been multiple instances of threatening, harassment and even murder of various whistleblowers. [8] [9] An engineer, Satyendra Dubey, was murdered in November 2003; Dubey had blown the whistle in a corruption case in the National Highways Authority of India’s Golden Quadrilateral project. [10]

Two years later, an Indian Oil Corporation officer, Shanmughan Manjunath, was murdered for sealing a petrol pump that was selling adulterated fuel. [11] [12]

A Karnataka official SP Mahantesh, said to be a whistle-blower in controversial land allotments by societies was murdered in May 2012. Mahantesh was working as Deputy Director of the audit wing in the state’s Cooperative department and had reported irregularities in different societies involving some officials and political figures. [13] A senior police officer alleged that Mayawati's government was corrupt and had embezzled large amounts of money. Shortly thereafter, he was sent to a psychiatric hospital. [14]

The activists demanded that a law should be framed to protect the whistleblowers, to facilitate the disclosure of information and uncover corruption in government organisations. [9]

Role of Supreme court

Situations are many where certain persons do not want to disclose the identity as well as the information/complaint passed on by them to the ACB. If the names of the persons, as well as the copy of the complaint sent by them are disclosed, that may cause embarrassment to them and sometimes threat to their lives.

Justice K S Radhakrishnan and Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri, Supreme Court of India [15]

In November 2003, Satyendra Dubey a whistleblower and National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) engineer was murdered after he exposed corruption in the construction of highways. [16] As a result, the Supreme Court, in April 2004, pressed the government into issuing an office order, the Public Interest Disclosures and Protection of Informers Resolution, 2004 designating CVC as the nodal agency. [17] [18]

In March 2011, the Supreme Court refused to frame guidelines for protection of whistle blowers in the country, saying that it cannot make law. However, the court allowed the petitioners to approach the high court for protection of whistleblowers in a specific case. [19]

In August 2013, a bench of Justices K S Radhakrishnan and Arjan Kumar Sikri ruled that identity of whistleblower can never be revealed to the accused facing prosecution under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. [15] [20]

Legislative progress

StageDate
IntroductionAugust 26, 2010
Standing Committee referralSeptember 16, 2010
Standing Committee reportJune 9, 2011
Lok SabhaPassed on 27 December 2011
Rajya SabhaPassed on 21 February 2014
Source: [21]

In order to receive a complain against alleged corruption and to protect the person making such a complain, the Government introduced "The Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bill, 2010" in the Lok Sabha on 26 August 2010. The Bill was referred to the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee. The recommendations by the committee were considered and amendments made. In June 2011, a parliamentary panel recommended that ministers, the higher judiciary, security organisations, defence and intelligence forces and regulatory authorities be brought under the whistleblowers' protection bill to check corruption and the willful misuse of power. [22] The bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 27 December 2011. [5] The Bill came up for consideration in the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2012 during the Monsoon Session, 2012. Though the Bill was listed on a number of days but could not be taken up for discussion in the Monsoon Session. Notices for moving motion for consideration and passing of the Bill and for moving official amendments were also given to the Rajya Sabha Secretariat during the Winter Session, 2012, Budget Session, 2013 and Monsoon Session, 2013 of Parliament, respectively, but the Bill could not be taken up. Notices for moving official amendments as well as for consideration and passing of the Bill were again sent to the Rajya Sabha during the Winter Session, 2013 of Parliament. The Bill was finally passed by the Rajya Sabha on 21 February 2014. [6] The Bill received the President's assent on 9 May 2014. However, the Act has not yet come into force, because amendments pertaining to safeguards against certain disclosures relevant to national security could not be incorporated, as the bill was passed on the last working day of the 15th Lok Sabha. [23] With these amendments, the Government brought in the Whistle Blowers Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2015 [24] [25] which the Lok Sabha passed on May 13, 2015. But the bill failed in Rajya Sabha and lapsed when the 16th Lok Sabha got dissolved in May 2019. Thereafter, the Government claimed that the Act was adequate, even without the amendments. [26] On 10 March 2017, another amendment bill was personally introduced by an M.P., [27] which was not passed and finally lapsed.

Analysis of the legislation

According to Indian law reports, the bill has faced considerable criticism because its jurisdiction is restricted to the government sector and encompasses only those who are working for the Government of India or its agencies; it does not cover the state-government employees. However, the draft bill aimed at protecting whistleblowers is seen as a welcome move. [21]

The lack of public debate and consultation on the bill seems to indicate the danger of it becoming another "paper tiger". Typically, ministries proposing draft legislation involve a process of public consultation to give the public an opportunity to carefully critique its provisions. [28] In this case, such an opportunity has been denied to the public, which has not gone unnoticed. [28]

The proposed law has neither provisions to encourage whistleblowing (financial incentives), nor deals with corporate whistleblowers; it does not extend its jurisdiction to the private sector (a strange omission, after the fraud at Satyam). The Directorate of Income Tax Intelligence and Criminal Investigation is one of the only agencies empowered for whistle blower protection.

The bill aims to balance the need to protect honest officials from harassment with protecting persons making a public-interest disclosure. It outlines sanctions for false complaints. However, it does not provide a penalty for attacking a complainant. [29]

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) was designated in 2004 to receive public-interest disclosures through government resolution; there have been a few hundred complaints every year. The provisions of the bill are similar to that of the resolution. Therefore, it is unlikely that the number of complaints will differ significantly. [29] The power of the CVC is limited to making recommendations. It cannot impose penalties, in contrast to the powers of the Karnataka and Delhi Lokayuktas. [29]

The bill has a limited definition of disclosure, and does not define victimisation. Other countries (such as the United States, United Kingdom and Canada) define disclosure more widely and define victimisation. [29]

It differs on many issues with the proposed Bill of the Law Commission and the Second Administrative Reform Commission’s report. These include non-admission of anonymous complaints and lack of penalties for officials who victimise whistleblowers. [29]

If enacted, the law to protect whistleblowers will assist in detecting corruption, ensuring better information flow and paving the way for successful prosecution of corrupt individuals through clear and protected processes. However, the public in India have a low level of confidence in fighting corruption because they fear retaliation and intimidation against those who file complaints. Another worry pertains to the delay in disposing of these cases. Without public debate on the provisions of this proposed law, it is clear that people cannot measure its effectiveness when the draft bill comes into force as law.

Central Vigilance Commission Initiative: Blow your whistle

The Central Vigilance Commission plans to create more awareness about corruption in India. To encourage the fight against corruption, CVC has provided on their website, a "Lodge Complaints Online" [30] portal. The earlier publicized portal Blow your whistle is no longer functional.

See also

Related Research Articles

Whistleblowing is the activity of a person, often an employee, revealing information about activity within a private or public organization that is deemed illegal, immoral, illicit, unsafe or fraudulent. Whistleblowers can use a variety of internal or external channels to communicate information or allegations. Over 83% of whistleblowers report internally to a supervisor, human resources, compliance, or a neutral third party within the company, hoping that the company will address and correct the issues. A whistleblower can also bring allegations to light by communicating with external entities, such as the media, government, or law enforcement. Some countries legislate as to what constitutes a protected disclosure, and the permissible methods of presenting a disclosure. Whistleblowing can occur in the private sector or the public sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rajya Sabha</span> Upper house of the Parliament of India

The Rajya Sabha, constitutionally the Council of States, is the upper house of the bicameral Parliament of India. As of 2023, it has a maximum membership of 250, of which 238 are elected by the legislatures of the states and union territories using single transferable votes through open ballots, while the president can appoint 12 members for their contributions to art, literature, science, and social services. The total allowed capacity is 250 according to article 80 of the Indian Constitution. The current potential seating capacity of the Rajya Sabha is 245, after the Jammu and Kashmir (Reorganisation) Act, 2019, the seats came down to 245. The maximum seats of 250 members can be filled up at the discretion and requirements of the house of Rajya Sabha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of India</span> Bicameral national legislature of India

The Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India. It is a bicameral legislature composed of the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha. The President of India, in their role as head of the legislature, has full powers to summon and prorogue either house of Parliament or to dissolve the Lok Sabha, but they can exercise these powers only upon the advice of the Prime Minister and their Union Council of Ministers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998</span> United Kingdom whistleblower legislation

The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (c.23) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that protects whistleblowers from detrimental treatment by their employer. Influenced by various financial scandals and accidents, along with the report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, the bill was introduced to Parliament by Richard Shepherd and given government support, on the condition that it become an amendment to the Employment Rights Act 1996. After receiving the Royal Assent on 2 July 1998, the Act came into force on 2 July 1999. It protects employees who make disclosures of certain types of information, including evidence of illegal activity or damage to the environment, from retribution from their employers, such as dismissal or being passed over for promotion. In cases where such retribution takes place the employee may bring a case before an employment tribunal, which can award compensation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right to Information Act, 2005</span> Act of the Government of India

The Right to Information (RTI) is an act of the Parliament of India which sets out the rules and procedures regarding citizens' right to information. It replaced the former Freedom of Information Act, 2002. Under the provisions of RTI Act, any citizen of India may request information from a "public authority" which is required to reply expeditiously or within thirty days. In case of matter involving a petitioner's life and liberty, the information has to be provided within 48 hours. The Act also requires every public authority to computerize their records for wide dissemination and to proactively publish certain categories of information so that the citizens need minimum recourse to request for information formally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Vigilance Commission</span> Apex Indian governmental body created in 1964 to address governmental corruption

Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is an apex Indian governmental body created in 1964 to address governmental corruption. In 2003, the Parliament enacted a law conferring statutory status on the CVC. It has the status of an autonomous body, free of control from any executive authority, charged with monitoring all vigilance activity under the Central Government of India, advising various authorities in central Government organizations in planning, executing, reviewing and reforming their vigilance work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whistleblower Protection Act</span> US law regarding protection of federal whistleblowers

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lokpal</span> Ombudsman agency of India

A Lokpal is an anti-corruption authority or body of ombudsman who represents the public interest in the Republic of India. The current Chairperson of Lokpal is Pradip Kumar Mohanty. The Lokpal has jurisdiction over central government to inquire into allegations of corruption against its public functionaries and for matters connected to corruption. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act was passed in 2013 with amendments in parliament, following the Jan Lokpal movement led by Anna Hazare in 2010. The Lokpal is responsible for enquiring into corruption charges at the national level while the Lokayukta performs the same function at the state level. The age of Lokpal on the date of assuming office as the chairperson or a member should not be less than 45 years.

The Lokayukta is the Indian Parliamentary Ombudsman, executed into power, through and for, each of the State Governments of India. It is brought into effect in a state, after passing the Lokayukta Act in respective state Legislature and a person of reputable background is nominated to the post. The post is created to quickly address grievances against the working integrity and efficiency of the government or its administration. Once appointed, Lokayukta cannot be dismissed or transferred by the government, and can only be removed by passing an impeachment motion by the state assembly, making it a powerful deterrent against corruption and mal-administration of the governing system.

The Jan Lokpal Bill, also referred to as the Citizen's Ombudsman Bill, was a bill drawn up by civil society activists in India seeking the appointment of a Jan Lokpal, an independent body to investigate corruption cases and complete the investigation within a year for envisaging trial in the case getting completed within one year.

The India Rejuvenation Initiative is an Indian anti-corruption organization formed by a group of retired and serving bureaucrats. IRI raises issues affecting common people. Started in the year 2005 by a group of people drawn from all walks of life, IRI focussed its attention towards corruption prevalent at the top echelons of Indian polity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013</span> Act of the Parliament of India

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, commonly known as The Lokpal Act, is an anti-corruption Act of Indian Parliament in India which "seeks to provide for the establishment of the institution of Lokpal to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain important public functionaries including the Prime Minister, cabinet ministers, members of parliament, Group A officials of the Central Government and for matters connecting them".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013</span> Act of the Parliament of India

The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 is a legislative act in India that seeks to protect women from sexual harassment at their place of work. It was passed by the Lok Sabha on 3 September 2012. It was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 26 February 2013. The Bill got the assent of the President on 23 April 2013. The Act came into force from 9 December 2013. This statute superseded the Vishaka Guidelines for Prevention Of Sexual Harassment (POSH) introduced by the Supreme Court (SC) of India. It was reported by the International Labour Organization that very few Indian employers were compliant to this statute. Most Indian employers have not implemented the law despite the legal requirement that any workplace with more than 10 employees need to implement it. According to a FICCI-EY November 2015 report, 36% of Indian companies and 25% among MNCs are not compliant with the Sexual Harassment Act, 2013. The government has threatened to take stern action against employers who fail to comply with this law.

Sanjiv Chaturvedi is an Indian Forest Service (IFoS) officer posted as Chief Conservator of Forest (Research) at Haldwani in the Nainital district of Uttarakhand. Chaturvedi was a Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) at AIIMS, New Delhi from 2012 to 2014, and served in the government of Haryana from 2005 to 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015</span> Act of the Parliament of India

Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 has been passed by Parliament of India amidst intense controversy, debate, and protest on many of its provisions by Child Rights fraternity. It replaced the Indian juvenile delinquency law, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and allows for juveniles in conflict with Law in the age group of 16–18, involved in Heinous Offences, to be tried as adults. The Act also sought to create a universally accessible adoption law for India, overtaking the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956) and the Guardians and Wards Act (1890), though not replacing them. The Act came into force from 15 January 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anjali Bhardwaj</span>

Anjali Bhardwaj is an Indian social activist working on issues of transparency and accountability. She is a co-convenor of the National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI) and a founding member of Satark Nagrik Sangathan. She works on issues related to right to information, Lokpal, whistleblower protection, grievance redress, and right to food.

The Repealing and Amending Act, 2015 is an Act of the Parliament of India that repealed 35 obsolete Acts, and also amended the provisions of The Prohibition of Manual Scavengers Act, 2013, and the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011 to correct typographical and certain patent errors. It was the first such repealing Act aimed at repealing obsolete laws tabled in Parliament by the Narendra Modi administration.

The Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968, is an act of the Indian Parliament through which the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) was raised on 10 March 1969. The CISF is a Central Armed Police Force which specialises in providing security and protection to industrial undertakings and other critical installations including nuclear plants, space centres and Delhi Metro. It is also the airport police of India.

Odisha Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Odisha (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Odisha Lokayukta and Deputy Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Rajasthan Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Rajasthan (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Rajasthan Lokayukta and Deputy Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

References

  1. ↑ Amended Act, as hosted in legislative.gov.in
  2. ↑ India, Times of (22 February 2014). "After 2 years and no changes, Whistleblowers Bill cleared | India News - Times of India". Times of India. Retrieved 22 February 2014.
  3. ↑ "Whistleblowers Protection Bill soon, Govt tells RS". The Times of India . 10 July 2009. Archived from the original on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
  4. ↑ "Cabinet clears whistleblower protection Bill". The Hindu. 10 August 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
  5. 1 2 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 17 December 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. 1 2 "Indian Parliament passes Whistleblowers Protection Bill 2011". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
  7. ↑ "Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011" (PDF). Gazette of India. Retrieved 13 May 2014.
  8. ↑ "A law for those who speak up". The Hindu. 22 May 2012. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
  9. 1 2 MGNREGA activist's murder
  10. ↑ ""Truth Silenced" pages on Satyendra Dubey Murder case". rediff.com. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
  11. ↑ "Manjunath case: court commutes death sentence". The Hindu . 12 December 2009. Archived from the original on 16 December 2009. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  12. ↑ "Manjunath murder: Death penalty commuted to life-term". Zee News. 12 December 2009. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  13. ↑ Staff Reporter (20 May 2012). "Whistleblower pays with life". The Hindu. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  14. ↑ "UP cop calls Mayawati govt corrupt, dumped in mental asylum". The Times of India . 5 November 2011. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 5 November 2011.
  15. 1 2 "SC: Can't tell accused who whistleblower is". Times of India. 23 August 2013. Retrieved 23 August 2013.
  16. ↑ BBC 10 December 2003 Veejaypee demands murder enquiry
  17. ↑ "Raval: CVC must protect 'bravehearts'". The Times of India . 13 April 2004. Archived from the original on 23 August 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
  18. ↑ "India doesn't have a law to protect whistleblower". The Times of India . 29 March 2010. Archived from the original on 29 August 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
  19. ↑ "Supreme Court refuses to frame guideline for protection of whistleblowers". DNA. 28 March 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
  20. ↑ "Refusal to furnish complaint will not affect accused's trial: Apex court". Deccan Herald. 23 August 2013. Retrieved 23 August 2013.
  21. 1 2 "The Whistle Blowers Protection Bill, 2011". Prsindia.org. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  22. ↑ More power for whistleblowers bill
  23. ↑ Present Status of Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2011, Press Information Bureau, 11 December 2014.
  24. ↑ PRS Legislative Research
  25. ↑ Bill notification
  26. ↑ The Economic Times, 26 October 2019
  27. ↑ bill from Lok Sabha site
  28. 1 2 admin. "Indian Law: The Whistleblowers Protection Bill Cleared by the Cabinet" . Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 "PRS - Bill Track - The Whistle Blowers Protection Bill, 2011" . Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  30. ↑ "Lodge Complaints Online"."Lodge Complaints Online", Central Vigilance Commission. (caution: not secure, see referring text)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.