Zero-rating

Last updated
Portuguese company MEO gives zero-rated access to their own service "MEO cloud". Even though it does not provide unlimited mobile data, it offers packages to give zero-rated access to other applications and services. Contrary to popular belief it does not prevent the usage of said applications while using the regular unused data, but instead offers packages where applications and services within said package are not counted towards the data consumed. + Smart Net - advertisement offering service packages.png
Portuguese company MEO gives zero-rated access to their own service "MEO cloud". Even though it does not provide unlimited mobile data, it offers packages to give zero-rated access to other applications and services. Contrary to popular belief it does not prevent the usage of said applications while using the regular unused data, but instead offers packages where applications and services within said package are not counted towards the data consumed.

Zero-rating is the practice of providing Internet access without financial cost under certain conditions, such as by permitting access to only certain websites or by subsidizing the service with advertising or by exempting certain websites from the data allowance. [1] [2]

Contents

Commentators discussing zero-rating present it often in the context of net neutrality. [2] While most sources report that use of zero-rating is contrary to the principle of net neutrality, there are mixed opinions among advocates of net neutrality about the extent to which people can benefit from zero-rating programs while retaining net neutrality protections. [2] Supporters of zero-rating argue that it enables consumers to make choices to access more data and leads to more people using online services, but critics believe zero-rating exploits the poor, creates opportunities for censorship, and disrupts the free market. [2]

Existing programs

Internet services like Facebook, Wikipedia and Google have built special programs to use zero-rating as means to provide their service more broadly into developing markets. The benefit for these new customers, who will mostly have to rely on mobile networks to connect to the Internet, would be a subsidised access to services from these service providers. The results of these efforts have been mixed, with adoption in a number of markets, sometimes overestimated expectations and perceived lack of benefits for mobile network operators. [3] In Chile, the national telecom regulator ruled that this practice violated net neutrality laws and had to end by June 1, 2014. [4] [5] The Federal Communications Commission did not ban zero-rating programs, but it "acknowledged that they could violate the spirit of net neutrality". [6]

Since June 2014, U.S. mobile provider T-Mobile US has offered zero-rated access to participating music streaming services to its mobile internet customers. T-Mobile US launched its plan called “Music Freedom” which would exempt users of T-Mobile US from having to pay premium prices for access to music content; additionally, this content access would not count as part of an individual's cap, which is the limit they can reach before they are charged for data. [7] [8] In November 2015, T-Mobile US expanded zero-rated access to video streaming services. [9]

In January 2016, Verizon joined AT&T by creating its own sponsored data program, FreeBee Data, which "enables content providers to pay a wireless provider to allow its subscribers to engage with or consume a piece of content without it counting against the customers' monthly allotments". [10] Sponsored data on behalf of content providers through AT&T or Verizon covers the costs for the viewers and attracts more consumers. Some people have characterized this as ISPs having created a toll-free service for online users.

Advocates of net neutrality state that sponsored data "allows well-heeled content providers to pay for placement to the disadvantage of smaller companies that can't afford the same luxury". [11] Verizon's FreeBee Data program which allows its own customers to access certain content, like ESPN and its video streaming service, for free along with any other relevant app access and the data will not count against their monthly caps. In this way, big ISPs discriminate against data and content from those who do not pay to have their content included in the FreeBee or other sponsored programs.

Similarly, mobile network operators are also able to use the underlying classification technology like deep packet inspection to redirect enterprise-related data charges for employees using their private tablets or smartphones to their employer. [12] This has the benefit of Toll-free / zero-rated applications allowing employees to participate in bring your own device (BYOD) programs.

In education, and as a response to the closure of school buildings due to the COVID-19 pandemics, Colombian government has created a learning resources platform for mobile phone (movil.colombiaaprende) and "published a decree requesting mobile operators to provide zero-rating conditions for access to specific education services and websites (both voice and data). The government reached an agreement with mobile and Internet operators ensuring all inhabitants have access to educational content and guidelines, in particular lower income households, with a cap at about USD 20." [13]

WhatsApp and Facebook cases

Starting 2015, Facebook was zero-rated in India. A year after, the local regulator forbade that practice. [14] The popular application WhatsApp [15] has been regularly finger-pointed by various journalists, bloggers and observers, to use intensively the zero-rating practice to encourage mobile users, the usage of its application, for no charge or consumption in the subscription-quota. Countries such as Brazil, [16] South Africa, [17] [18] Argentina, [19] [20] [21] Mexico, [22] etc..

In 2017, a long report underlines [23] that a certain number of emerging countries, or small countries, let the zero-rating for a certain number of services, especially for GAFAM ones, others big companies (Yahoo, Twitter), and smaller ones (including music steaming). Those countries, providing zero-rating, are Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago. That reports alerts that a certain trio of services, are systematically present in each country: Facebook, WhatsApp and Twitter.

Reception and impact

Zero-rating certain services, fast lanes and sponsored data have been criticised as anti-competitive and limiting open markets. [24] It enables internet providers to gain a significant advantage in the promotion of in-house services over competing independent companies, especially in data-heavy markets like video-streaming. A service provider, who is offering unlimited access to their service, will naturally seem more favourable to consumers over one where usage is limited. If the first provider is the one restricting access, they are creating a considerable advantage for themselves over their competition, thereby restricting the freedom of the market. As many new internet and content services are launched targeting primarily mobile usage, and further adoption of internet connectivity globally (including broadband in rural areas of developed countries) relies heavily on mobile, zero-rating has also been regarded as a threat to the open internet, which is typically available via fixed line networks with unlimited usage tariffs or flat rates. [25] [26] Facebook and the Wikimedia Foundation have been specifically criticized for their zero-rating programs, to further strengthen incumbent mobile network operators and limit consumer rights to an open internet. [27]

The United States has not officially made a decision on the regulation of zero-rating providers; instead, adopting a “wait-and-see” approach to the matter. The FCC has therefore elected to examine on a case-by-case basis under a “general conduct rule” that “prohibits unreasonable interference with end users’ ability to select content and content providers’ ability to reach end users”. [28] Days before the Trump inauguration, the Obama administration FCC issued a report expressing concerns with T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T and their sponsored data programs. The FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau found issues in wireless broadband services that vertically integrate their own affiliated programming, along with service providers allowing unaffiliated content providers to sponsor data. The report concluded that vertically affiliated broadband providers that zero-rate affiliated content most likely violate the general conduct rule. [29]

In the EU, specific cases such as those of Portugal were under scrutiny by national and EU regulators as of 2017, following the BEREC regulation on net neutrality. [30]

In addition to commercial interests, governments with a cultural agenda may support zero-rating for local content. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet service provider</span> Organization that provides access to the Internet

An Internet service provider (ISP) is an organization that provides myriad services related to accessing, using, managing, or participating in the Internet. ISPs can be organized in various forms, such as commercial, community-owned, non-profit, or otherwise privately owned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Net neutrality</span> Principle that Internet service providers should treat all data equally

Network neutrality, often referred to as net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally, offering users and online content providers consistent transfer rates regardless of content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination address, or method of communication. Net neutrality was advocated for in the 1990s by the presidential administration of Bill Clinton in the United States. Clinton's signing of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, an amendment to the Communications Act of 1934, set a worldwide example for net neutrality laws and the regulation of ISPs.

Bandwidth throttling consists in the limitation of the communication speed, of the ingoing (received) or outgoing (sent) data in a network node or in a network device such as computers and mobile phones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xfinity</span> American cable provider

Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, doing business as Xfinity, is an American telecommunications business segment and division of the Comcast Corporation. It is used to market consumer cable television, internet, telephone, and wireless services provided by the company. The brand was first introduced in 2010; prior to that, these services were marketed primarily under the Comcast name.

In the United States, net neutrality—the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) should make no distinctions between different kinds of content on the Internet, and to not discriminate based on such distinctions—has been an issue of contention between end-users and ISPs since the 1990s. With net neutrality, ISPs may not intentionally block, slow down, or charge different rates for specific online content. Without net neutrality, ISPs may prioritize certain types of traffic, meter others, or potentially block specific types of content, while charging consumers different rates for that content.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in the United States</span>

The Internet in the United States grew out of the ARPANET, a network sponsored by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense during the 1960s. The Internet in the United States of America in turn provided the foundation for the worldwide Internet of today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MEO (telecommunication company)</span> Portuguese telecommunications company

MEO is a mobile and fixed telecommunications service and brand from Altice Portugal, managed by MEO - Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia. The service was piloted in Lisbon in 2007 and was later extended to Porto and Castelo Branco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in India</span>

Internet in India began in 1986 and was initially available only to the educational and research community. General public access to the internet in India began on 15 August 1995. By 2023, India had more than 900 million Internet users. It is reported that in 2022 an average mobile Internet consumption in India was 19.5 GB per month and the mobile data usage per month rose from 4.5 exabytes in 2018 to 14.4 exabytes in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Verizon</span> American telecommunications company

Verizon Communications Inc., is an American telecommunications company headquartered in New York City. It is the world's second-largest telecommunications company by revenue and its mobile network is the largest wireless carrier in the United States, with 114.2 million subscribers as of September 30, 2024.

An over-the-top media service is a digital distribution service offered directly to viewers via the public Internet, rather than through an over-the-air, cable, or satellite provider. The term is synonymous with "streaming platform", such as Netflix and Amazon Prime Video which provide access to subscription-based film and television content (SVoD). OTT television, commonly called streaming television, has become the most popular OTT content.

Tiered service structures allow users to select from a small set of tiers at progressively increasing price points to receive the product or products best suited to their needs. Such systems are frequently seen in the telecommunications field, specifically when it comes to wireless service, digital and cable television options, and broadband internet access.

Net bias is the counter-principle to net neutrality, which indicates differentiation or discrimination of price and the quality of content or applications on the Internet by ISPs. Similar terms include data discrimination, digital redlining, and network management.

Wikipedia Zero was a project by the Wikimedia Foundation to provide access to Wikipedia free of charge on mobile phones via zero-rating, particularly in developing markets. The objective of the program was to facilitate access to free knowledge for low-income pupils and students, by means of waiving the network traffic cost. With 97 operators in over 72 countries, it was estimated that access to Wikipedia was provided to more than 800 million people through the program. The program ended in 2018.

Internet.org is a partnership between social networking services company Meta Platforms and six companies that plans to bring affordable access to selected Internet services to less developed countries by increasing efficiency, and facilitating the development of new business models around the provision of Internet access. The app delivering these services was renamed Free Basics in September 2015. As of April 2018, 100 million people were using internet.org.

Facebook Zero is an initiative undertaken by social networking service company Facebook in collaboration with mobile phone-based Internet providers, whereby the providers waive data (bandwidth) charges for accessing Facebook on phones via a stripped-down text-only version of its mobile website. The stripped-down version is available online only through providers who have entered the agreement with Facebook. Photos are not loaded by default. Users may still choose to view them by clicking through but regular data charges apply to photo use.

Google Free Zone was a global initiative undertaken by the Internet company Google in collaboration with mobile phone-based Internet providers, whereby the providers waive data (bandwidth) charges for accessing select Google products such as Google Search, Gmail, and Google+. In order to use this service, users were required to have a Google account and a phone that had access to an internet connection.

Mechanisms for establishing rules ensuring net neutrality in India, are at present mainly enforced by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). At present, there are no specific legislation regarding Net Neutrality in India.

Net neutrality law refers to laws and regulations which enforce the principle of net neutrality.

Airtel Zero was a platform launched on 6 April 2015 in India by Bharti Airtel, a multinational telecommunications service company across South Asia and, at the time, the largest cellular service provider in India, with 192.22 million subscribers. As per reports, Airtel Zero was a platform through which Airtel would have offered users free access to certain mobile applications and services from companies who had signed up with Airtel.

Net neutrality is the principle that governments should mandate Internet service providers to treat all data on the Internet the same, and not discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication. For instance, under these principles, internet service providers are unable to intentionally block, slow down or charge money for specific websites and online content.

References

  1. ↑ "Jan Krämer, Martin Peitz: A fresh look at zero rating" (PDF). www.cerre.eu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-12-10. Retrieved 2019-12-10.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Bates, Samantha; Bavitz, Christopher; Hessekiel, Kira (5 October 2017). "Zero Rating & Internet Adoption". cyber.harvard.edu. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  3. ↑ Morris, Anne (January 11, 2014). "For zero-rated deals, OTT providers can no longer assume the carrier will pay". Fierce Wireless Europe. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved July 3, 2014.
  4. ↑ Mirani, Leo (May 30, 2014). "Less than zero – When net neutrality backfires: Chile just killed free access to Wikipedia and Facebook". Quartz. Archived from the original on July 4, 2014. Retrieved July 2, 2014.
  5. ↑ McKenzie, Jessica (June 2, 2014). "Face Off in Chile: Net Neutrality v. Human Right to Facebook & Wikipedia". Archived from the original on July 5, 2014. Retrieved July 2, 2014.
  6. ↑ "Wolverton: Battle for net neutrality isn't over". www.mercurynews.com. 5 February 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2016-02-29.
  7. ↑ Ziegler, Chris (June 18, 2014). "T-Mobile's 'Music Freedom' is a great feature — and a huge problem". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2018-05-19. Retrieved 2018-05-30.
  8. ↑ "T-Mobile's latest 'Un-carrier' feature: Rhapsody Unradio, an odd streaming music service". June 18, 2014. Archived from the original on June 19, 2014. Retrieved June 19, 2014.
  9. ↑ "T-Mobile Stops Counting Netflix, HBO, Hulu, And Other Video Streams Against Your Data Usage". November 10, 2015. Archived from the original on December 29, 2015. Retrieved December 30, 2015.
  10. ↑ Tonner, Andrew (21 January 2016). "Verizon Joins AT&T in This Controversial Net Neutrality Practice -- The Motley Fool". The Motley Fool. Archived from the original on 2016-02-23. Retrieved 2016-02-29.
  11. ↑ Tonner, Andrew (21 January 2016). "Verizon Joins AT&T in This Controversial Net Neutrality Practice – The Motley Fool". The Motley Fool. Archived from the original on 2016-02-23. Retrieved 2016-02-29.
  12. ↑ Fitchard, Kevin (January 6, 2014). "AT&T launches "Sponsored Data," inviting content providers to pay consumers' mobile data bills". Gigaom. Archived from the original on January 28, 2021. Retrieved July 3, 2014.
  13. ↑ "OECD-EI Report – Effective and Equitable Educational Recovery – 10 Principles, 28 April 2021 – OECD". www.oecd.org. Archived from the original on 2021-05-16. Retrieved 2021-05-16.
  14. ↑ Banis, Davide. "How 'Zero-Rating' Offers Threaten Net-Neutrality In The Developing World". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  15. ↑ "Facebook, Google & Big Telecoms Want to Keep Violating Net Neutrality in Europe. Regulators Should Stop Them". cyberlaw.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  16. ↑ "Is Zero-Rating A Threat To Human Rights?". Human Rights Pulse. 2022-01-22. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  17. ↑ "Fight looming over zero rating in South Africa - TechCentral". 2023-10-30. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  18. ↑ "Technologie : comment Whatsapp a conquis l'Afrique - Jeune Afrique.com". JeuneAfrique.com (in French). Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  19. ↑ Sergio (2017-12-05). "Whatsapp gratis versus neutralidad en la red". Derecho en Zapatillas by Sergio Mohadeb (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  20. ↑ "Whastapp gratis para todes ¿y el resto?". LadoB (in Spanish). 2017-11-30. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  21. ↑ "Telecompaper". www.telecompaper.com. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  22. ↑ "WhatsApp as 'technology of life': Reframing research agendas". firstmonday.org. Archived from the original on 2024-08-05. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  23. ↑ "GCIG%20no.47_1.pdf -- page 3" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-12. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
  24. ↑ Drossos, Antonios (April 26, 2014). "Forget fast lanes. The real threat for net-neutrality is zero-rated content". Gigaom. Archived from the original on February 12, 2021. Retrieved July 3, 2014.
  25. ↑ Gillmor, Dan (June 6, 2014). "A government ruled for net neutrality. Too bad it wasn't your government". The Guardian. Archived from the original on July 29, 2014. Retrieved July 25, 2014.
  26. ↑ Reardon, Marguerite (February 26, 2016). "Can unlimited video really be that bad?". Archived from the original on March 10, 2016. Retrieved March 10, 2016.
  27. ↑ MacDonald, Raegan (August 8, 2014). "Wikipedia Zero and net neutrality: Wikimedia turns its back on the open internet". access. Archived from the original on January 4, 2015. Retrieved August 15, 2014.
  28. ↑ 2015 Open Internet Order, supra note 13, at 5666–69 paras. 151–53.
  29. ↑ FCC, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Report: Policy Review of Mobile Broadband Operators’ Sponsored Data Offerings for Zero-Rated Content and Services. Jan. 11, 2017.
  30. ↑ Andrei Khalip & Agnieszka Flak (2017-12-15). "False paradise? EU is no haven of Net neutrality, say critics". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2017-12-17. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  31. ↑ Taylor, Kate (5 May 2017). "Is exempting Cancon from data charges the best way to promote it?". The Globe and Mail . Archived from the original on 5 May 2017. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.