Canonical territory

Last updated

A canonical territory is, in some Christian denominations, a geographical area seen as belonging to a particular bishop or Church as its own when it comes to ecclesiastical matters, whether by tradition or by canon law. The concept is found both in the Eastern Orthodox Church and Catholic Church.

Contents

According to Andriy Mykhaleyko, the expression "canonical territory" is "rather difficult to define as it can refer to a variety of different aspects, from an ecclesiological, geographical, and cultural entity to the territorial or canonical jurisdiction of a church as an expression of its local community, or the pastoral theological care of the faithful in a particular territory." [1]

Historical background

Canons of the Apostles

Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev, of the Russian Orthodox Church, asserts that

[t]he model of church organization that was formed during the first three centuries of Christianity was based on the principle of "one city-one bishop-one Church", which foresaw the assignment of a certain ecclesiastical territory to one concrete bishop." In accordance with this principle, the "Canons of the Apostles" and other canonical decrees of the ancient Church point to the inadmissibility of violating the boundaries of ecclesiastical territories by bishops or clergy. [2]

Some canons of the Canons of the Apostles state that: [2]

  1. the bishop should not leave his diocese and go over to another without authorization (can. 14);
  2. the bishop may not ordain outside the boundaries of his diocese (can. 35);
  3. when transferring to another city, excommunicated clergymen or laymen cannot be accepted into communion by another bishop (can. 12);
  4. clergymen who go over to another diocese without the consent of their bishop are deprived of the right to serve (can. 15);
  5. prohibition of serving or excommunication of a clergyman imposed by one bishop cannot by removed by another bishop (can. 16, 32).

"In defining the boundaries of ecclesiastical territories, the Fathers of the ancient undivided Church took into account civil territorial divisions established by secular authorities," according to Alfeyev. He adds: "[a]lthough the principle of having ecclesiastical territories correspond to civil ones was accepted as a guiding principle in the ancient Church, it was never absolutized or viewed as having no alternatives." Alfeyev cites the conflict between two bishops, Basil of Caesarea and Anthimus of Tyana, as an example. [2]

Present situation

Eastern Orthodoxy

Canonical territories of autocephalous and autonomous Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions as of 2022. Canonical territories of autocephalous and autonomous Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions (2022).svg
Canonical territories of autocephalous and autonomous Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions as of 2022.

Even before the 2018 Moscow–Constantinople schism, the issue of canonical territory had proven to be a significant point of dispute between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Ecumenical Patriarchate over Ukraine.

Russian Orthodox Church

The meaning of canonical territory in the context of the Russian Orthodox Church "is not self-evident, and no detailed explanation of it is given in any official document." [3] :21 The Russian Orthodox Church defines the geographic extent of its canonical territory as including all the territory within China, Japan, and the post-Soviet states excluding Armenia and Georgia. [3] :21 [4] [lower-alpha 1] It statutes define its sphere of jurisdiction as including "also [Eastern] Orthodox Christians living in other countries" outside of its canonical territory. [4] [lower-alpha 2] The geographic extent of the canonical territory defined by the Russian Orthodox Church is disputed by other Eastern Orthodox Churches. [6] [7]

Phyletism

In diaspora countries such as France and the United States, problems with canonical territory have often given rise to the problem of phyletism, which is defined as the principle of nationalities applied in the ecclesiastical domain and the confusion between Church and nation.

Catholic Church

Eastern Catholic Churches

Canonical territories are mentioned numerous times in the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. [lower-alpha 3]

In the Eastern Catholic Churches that have the rank of patriarchate, the patriarchal synod elects bishops for the patriarchate's canonical territory. Bishops who head eparchies situated outside that territory are appointed by the Pope. [8]

Notes

  1. As of 2013 the Russian Orthodox Church statutes list its canonical territory as within the states of Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Estonia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. [4]
  2. As of 2015 the Russian language typical edition includes the phrase voluntarily joining ("на добровольно входящих в") which the English edition phrase, "also Orthodox Christians living in other countries," does not include. [4] [5]
  3. Examples of CCEO canons that speak of the canonical territory of a sui iris church include 57, 78, 86, 102, 132, 133, 138-140, 143, 146-150.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Orthodox Diocese of Sourozh</span> Diocese of Russian Orthodox Church in Great Britain

The Russian Orthodox Diocese of Sourozh is a diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), covering the islands of Great Britain and Ireland. Since 28 December 2018, the Diocese of Sourozh is part of the Patriarchal Exarchate in Western Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Filaret (Denysenko)</span>

Patriarch Filaret is a Ukrainian religious leader, currently serving as the primate and Patriarch of the unrecognized Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate. The Orthodox Church of Ukraine, that he left in 2019, views him as the Honorary Patriarch emeritus, while the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople recognises him as former Metropolitan of Kyiv. He was formerly the Metropolitan of Kiev and the Exarch of Ukraine in the Patriarchate of Moscow (1966–1992). After joining the Kyiv Patriarchate, he was defrocked and in 1997 excommunicated by the ROC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia</span> Semi-autonomous part of the Russian Orthodox Church

The Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, also called Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia or ROCOR, or Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA), is a semi-autonomous part of the Russian Orthodox Church. Currently, the position of First-Hierarch of the ROCOR is occupied by Metropolitan Nicholas (Olhovsky).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)</span> Church in Ukraine under disputed jurisdiction of Russian Orthodox church

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), commonly referred to by the exonym Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP), is an Eastern Orthodox church in Ukraine.

The Catacomb Church as a collective name labels those representatives of the Russian Orthodox clergy, laity, communities, monasteries, brotherhoods, etc., who for various reasons, have moved to an illegal position since the 1920s. In a narrow sense, the term "catacomb church" means not just illegal communities, but communities that rejected subordination to the Acting patriarchal locum tenens Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) after 1927, and adopted anti-Soviet positions. During the Cold War the ROCOR popularized the term in the latter sense, first within the Russian diaspora, and then in the USSR by sending illegal literature there. The expression "True Orthodox church" is synonym for this latter, narrower sense of "catacomb church".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 30 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics)</span>

November 29 - Eastern Orthodox liturgical calendar - December 1

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate</span> Self-governed church of Russian Orthodox Church

The Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate is a semi-autonomous church in the canonical jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Moscow whose primate is appointed by the Holy Synod of the latter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 6 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics)</span>

November 5 - Eastern Orthodox liturgical calendar - November 7

<span class="mw-page-title-main">December 27 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics)</span> Day in the Eastern Orthodox liturgical calendar

December 26 - Eastern Orthodox liturgical calendar - December 28

<span class="mw-page-title-main">December 30 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics)</span>

December 29 - Eastern Orthodox liturgical calendar - December 31

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Moscow–Constantinople schism</span> Ongoing split between the Eastern Orthodox patriarchates of Moscow and Constantinople

A schism between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople began on 15 October 2018 when the former unilaterally severed full communion with the latter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 Moscow–Constantinople schism</span> Schism between orthodox churches

In 1996 a schism between Moscow and Constantinople occurred; this schism began on 23 February 1996, when the Russian Orthodox Church severed full communion with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, and ended on 16 May 1996 when the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ecumenical Patriarchate reached an agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diocese of the Philippines and Vietnam</span>

The Diocese of the Philippines and Vietnam is a diocese of the Patriarchate of Moscow created on 26 February 2019, directly under the Patriarchal Exarchate in Southeast Asia (PESEA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autocephaly of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine</span> Process of granting of autocephaly to the Eastern Orthodox church in Ukraine

On 5 January 2019, Bartholomew I, the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, signed the tomos that officially recognized and established the Orthodox Church of Ukraine and granted it autocephaly (self-governorship). The events immediately leading to the grant of autocephaly were:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reactions of the Eastern Orthodox churches to the 2018 Moscow–Constantinople schism</span>

On 15 October 2018, the Russian Orthodox Church broke the communion with the Ecumenical Patriarchate because of a dispute concerning the canonical jurisdiction over Ukraine. This led to the 2018 Moscow–Constantinople schism. Numerous Orthodox churches took position concerning the dispute over the canonical jurisdiction over Ukraine, whether before or after this schism.

The Patriarchal Exarchate in Western Europe is an exarchate created by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) on 28 December 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish-Portuguese diocese</span> Diocese of the Moscow Patriarchate of Spain and Portugal.

The Spanish-Portuguese diocese (SPD) or Diocese of Madrid and Lisbon is a diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) created on 28 December 2018. The diocese is part of the Patriarchal Exarchate in Western Europe.

The Patriarchal Exarchate in South-East Asia is an exarchate created by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) on 28 December 2018.

The Diocese of Thailand is a diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church which covers the territory Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar. It is part of the Patriarchal Exarchate in South-East Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate</span> Synodal institution of the Russian Orthodox Church

The Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate (DECR) is one of the synodal institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church. It was established on 4 April 1946.

References

  1. Mykhaleyko, Andriy (2019-12-01). "The New Independent Orthodox Church in Ukraine". Comparative Southeast European Studies. 67 (4): 476–499. doi: 10.1515/soeu-2019-0037 . ISSN   2364-933X. S2CID   211229487.
  2. 1 2 3 Alfeyev, Hilarion (2006-01-27). "The canonical territories of the local Orthodox churches – part I". orthodoxytoday.org. Bonita Springs, FL: Johannes Jacobse. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2015-10-12.
  3. 1 2 Wasmuth, Jennifer (2014). "Russian Orthodoxy between state and nation". In Krawchuk, Andrii; Bremer, Thomas (eds.). Eastern Orthodox encounters of identity and otherness: values, self-reflection, dialogue. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   9781137382849.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Russian Orthodox Church (2013). "Statute of the Russian Orthodox Church adopted by the Bishops' Council in 2000, amended by the Bishops' Council in 2008 and 2011 and adopted as amended by the Bishops' Council in 2013". mospat.ru. Moscow: Russian Orthodox Church. Department for External Church Relations. §I ¶3. Archived from the original on 2015-06-27. Retrieved 2015-10-12.
  5. Русская Православная Церковь (2013). "Устав Русской Православной Церкви принят на Архиерейском Соборе 2000 г. определениями Архиерейских Соборов 2008 и 2011 гг. В текст устава был внесен ряд поправок. Архиерейский Собор 2013 г. Принял исправленную и дополненную редакцию устава". mospat.ru (in Russian). Москва: Русская Православная Церковь. Отдел внешних церковных связей. §I ¶3. Archived from the original on 2015-06-26. Retrieved 2015-10-12.
  6. Kalistchuk, Yurij (2010-09-24). "To the clergy and faithful of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada on the presence of the Holy Relics of Great Knyaz' Volodymyr of Kyiv in Canada" (PDF). uocc.ca. Winnipeg: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-10-12. Retrieved 2015-10-12.
  7. Buciora, Jaroslaw (2011-04-04). "The Moscow Patriarchate's utopian vision of Russian civilization". risu.org.ua. Lviv, UA: Religious Information Service of Ukraine. Archived from the original on 2011-08-21. Retrieved 2015-10-12.
  8. Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, canon 181 Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine

Further reading