Correspondence of Paul and Seneca

Last updated
Art depicting Saint Paul in a 9th-century manuscript from the Abbey of Saint Gall. Paulus St Gallen.jpg
Art depicting Saint Paul in a 9th-century manuscript from the Abbey of Saint Gall.

The Correspondence of (or between) Paul and Seneca, also known as the Letters of Paul and Seneca or Epistle to Seneca the Younger, is a collection of letters claiming to be between Paul the Apostle and Seneca the Younger. There are 8 epistles from Seneca, and 6 replies from Paul. They were purportedly authored from 58–64 CE during the reign of Roman Emperor Nero, but appear to have actually been written in the middle of the fourth century (c. 320–380 CE). Until the Renaissance, the epistles were seen as genuine, but scholars began to critically examine them in the 15th century, and today they are held to be inauthentic forgeries.

Contents

Summary and background

A 14th-century English depiction of three classical philosophers held in high esteem in the medieval era: Plato, Seneca, and Aristotle. Seneca's reputation was partially linked to his apocryphal friendship with Paul. Plato Seneca Aristotle medieval.jpg
A 14th-century English depiction of three classical philosophers held in high esteem in the medieval era: Plato, Seneca, and Aristotle. Seneca's reputation was partially linked to his apocryphal friendship with Paul.

Paul of Tarsus was an early Christian theologian and evangelist, who wrote epistles to Christian communities and founded multiple churches across the Greek-speaking Eastern Mediterranean region. Seneca the Younger was one of the foremost philosophers of Stoicism, a teacher and adviser to Emperor Nero, a dramatist, and a Roman government official. The correspondence between them comprises fourteen letters in total (8 from Seneca, 6 from Paul) and is written in Latin. It has little substantive content. It largely consists of the two praising each other; Seneca lavishes flattery on Paul, while Paul responds in kind. [1] [2] For example, the first epistle from Seneca states that "[Paul's works] are so lofty and so brilliant with noble sentiments that in my opinion generations of men could hardly be enough to become established and perfected in them. I wish you good health, brother." [3] Essentially, the main interest of these letters is that they exist at all: they ostensibly demonstrate that Paul was important and respected enough to trade letters with the eminent philosopher Seneca, that Seneca was wise enough to understand Paul's greatness despite being a pagan, and that the two were friends. [1] [4]

Many, but not all, surviving manuscripts include dates on some of the letters of the correspondence. [5] The earliest of these is "27 June in the consulship of Nero III and Messala" (58 CE) and the latest is "28 March in the consulship of Frugi and Bassus" (64 CE). [6] The one epistle that does include substantive content is the 11th one dated 64 CE, which directly discusses the Great Fire of Rome allegedly started by Nero but blamed on the Christians. [2]

Reception in the late Roman Empire and the Middle Ages

The earliest known reference to them is in Jerome's On Illustrious Men chapter 12, a work of around 392 CE: [7]

Lucius Annaeus Seneca of Cordova, a disciple of the Stoic Sotion, and paternal uncle of the poet Lucan, was a man of very temperate life whom I would not place in a catalogue of saints, were it not that I was prompted to do so by those Letters from Paul to Seneca and from Seneca to Paul which are very widely read. In these, when Seneca was Nero's teacher and the most influential person of the period, he said that he wished to have the same position among his own [i.e., the pagans] which Paul had among the Christians. Two years before Peter and Paul were crowned with martyrdom, he was put to death by Nero.

—  Jerome, De Viris Illustribus (On Illustrious Men) [8]

Augustine of Hippo also briefly mentions the correspondence, as does Pseudo-Linus. [9] [10] [11] During the late fourth and fifth century, such a correspondence was both plausible and interesting to educated Roman Christians. The Acts of the Apostles claims that Paul briefly met Seneca's brother, Gallio. [12] Stoicism, much like Hellenistic Judaism, was considered a precursor to Christianity that helped influence its stances and terminology; conscientia ('conscience') was originally a Stoic term, for example, and Stoicism's criticisms of the (pagan) Roman religion was something Christians were eager to take for themselves as well. [13] The correspondence was in circulation during the Middle Ages among Latin-reading areas (Western Europe, rather than the Greek-reading Byzantine East), and likely contributed to Seneca having a good reputation among medieval Christians. [14] [15] [16] The medieval authors Peter of Cluny, Peter Abelard, and Petrarch all seem familiar with the correspondence. [17] A few medieval writers such as Giovanni Colonna and Giovanni Boccaccio even claimed that Seneca had outright converted to Christianity before his suicide in 65 CE, partially on the basis of the correspondence. [18]

Scholarly analysis

Scholars almost universally believe the correspondence to be forged. [14] [note 1] During the 15th century in the Renaissance, more skeptical analysis raised doubts on the veracity of the correspondence. [5] Scholars such as Lorenzo Valla found that the writing style matched neither Seneca nor Paul, and the letters were denounced by Erasmus. [21] Later scholars detected errors of fact and chronology that the genuine Seneca would not have made, but a forger not intricately familiar with Roman history writing centuries later might have. Scholars noticed with skepticism just how late the letters appeared in history; Lactantius, a Christian author writing earlier in the 4th century, makes no mention of any such correspondence, despite frequently citing Seneca and positively evaluating both him and Paul. [2] This suggests their creation in the middle of the 4th century, such that Lactantius would have been unfamiliar, yet Jerome would think them legitimate. [1] [10]

The 11th letter dated to 64 CE bears a different writing style of Latin from the other letters, and is out of chronological sequence with the rest of the correspondence. This leads scholars to think that a different forger may have written that letter. [2] The 13th and 14th epistles also have a somewhat different style than the others, indicating they too may have been appended later. [10] Additionally, the 14th epistle is unusually direct about Paul's evangelism, with him calling on Seneca to "make yourself a new herald of Jesus Christ", [22] yet Jerome only quotes the 12th epistle in support of listing Seneca as a saint, leading to suspicion that the version of the correspondence Jerome read in the late 4th century did not yet include the final two letters. [11]

The motive of the forger is unknown. J. B. Lightfoot wrote that it was likely "either to recommend Seneca to Christian readers or to recommend Christianity to students of Seneca," [5] a position that Adolf von Harnack agreed with. [14] Claude Barlow thought that the writings might have been a rhetorical exercise; essentially, a fictional essay by a novice writer practicing their craft that escaped to readers who did not realize its origins. [23] J. K. Elliott wrote that it was "to show the superiority of Christianity over pagan philosophy." [10] Bart Ehrman suggests that the creation of the letters may have been part of early Christian apologia. In this theory, a Roman pagan polemic against Christianity was the claim that Paul was not particularly significant in his era. The forger accepted the somewhat elitist terms of this argument – that only "great" people deserve to be listened to – and responded by having the greatest philosopher of Paul's day endorse and praise Paul, so mere flattery was enough to serve the purpose of the apologist. [14]

Critics generally deride the worth of the correspondence as well for not including much of anything interesting, such as a debate on the merits of Stoicism, Christianity, or even just court gossip. [2] Erasmus wrote that "I do not see how he could have made these letters in a more feeble or insipid fashion." [14] Philip Schaff in his History of the Christian Church said that "They are very poor in thought and style, full of errors of chronology and history, and undoubtedly a forgery." [24] J. B. Lightfoot was caustic about the overall worth of the correspondence, criticizing "the poverty of thought and style, the errors in chronology and history, and the whole conception of the relative positions of the Stoic philosopher and the Christian Apostle" which "betray clearly the hand of a forger." [25]

As they are now universally allowed to be spurious, it will be unnecessary to state at length the grounds of their condemnation. It is sufficient to say that the letters are inane and unworthy throughout; that the style of either correspondent is unlike his genuine writings; that the relations between the two, as there represented, are highly improbable; and lastly, that the chronological notices (which however are absent in some important [manuscripts]) are wrong in almost every instance. Thus, independently of the unbroken silence of three centuries and a half about this correspondence, internal evidence alone is sufficient to condemn them hopelessly. [5]

—  J. B. Lightfoot, Dissertations on the Apostolic Age, The Letters of Paul and Seneca

Notes

  1. ↑ A tiny minority of 20th and 21st century works do support at least partial authenticity of the correspondence. Ilaria Ramelli is a rare example of an academic who cautiously supports partial authenticity, arguing that Paul's side of the correspondence might possibly be legitimate. [19] Italian historian Marta Sordi also supports the authenticity of the letters. [20]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epistle to Titus</span> Book of the New Testament

The Epistle to Titus is one of the three pastoral epistles in the New Testament, historically attributed to Paul the Apostle. It is addressed to Saint Titus and describes the requirements and duties of presbyters/bishops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epistle to the Laodiceans</span> Purported lost letter of the apostle Paul, mentioned in Colossians 4:16

The Epistle to the Laodiceans is a purported lost letter of Paul the Apostle, the original existence of which is inferred from an instruction in the Epistle to the Colossians that the congregation should send their letter to the believing community in Laodicea, and likewise obtain a copy of the letter "from Laodicea".

And when this letter has been read among you, have it read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and see that you read also the letter from Laodicea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ignatius of Antioch</span> Late 1st / early 2nd century Christian author and Patriarch of Antioch

Ignatius of Antioch, also known as Ignatius Theophorus, was an early Christian writer and Patriarch of Antioch. While en route to Rome, where he met his martyrdom, Ignatius wrote a series of letters. This correspondence forms a central part of a later collection of works by the Apostolic Fathers. He is considered one of the three most important of these, together with Clement of Rome and Polycarp. His letters also serve as an example of early Christian theology, and address important topics including ecclesiology, the sacraments, and the role of bishops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Epistle to the Thessalonians</span> Book of the New Testament

The Second Epistle to the Thessalonians is a book from the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It is traditionally attributed to Paul the Apostle, with Timothy as a co-author. Modern biblical scholarship is divided on whether the epistle was written by Paul; some scholars believe Paul wrote this epistle, but others reject its authenticity based on what they see as differences in style and theology between this and the First Epistle to the Thessalonians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seneca the Younger</span> Roman Stoic philosopher, statesman and dramatist (c. 4 BC–AD 65)

Lucius Annaeus Seneca the Younger, usually known mononymously as Seneca, was a Stoic philosopher of Ancient Rome, a statesman, dramatist, and in one work, satirist, from the post-Augustan age of Latin literature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epistle</span> Letter written for a didactic purpose

An epistle is a writing directed or sent to a person or group of people, usually an elegant and formal didactic letter. The epistle genre of letter-writing was common in ancient Egypt as part of the scribal-school writing curriculum. The letters in the New Testament from Apostles to Christians are usually referred to as epistles. Those traditionally attributed to Paul are known as Pauline epistles and the others as catholic epistles.

Marcionism was an early Christian dualistic belief system that originated with the teachings of Marcion of Sinope in Rome around 144 CE. Marcion was an early Christian theologian, evangelist, and an important figure in early Christianity. He was the son of a bishop of Sinope in Pontus. About the middle of the 2nd century (140–155) he traveled to Rome, where he joined the Syrian Gnostic Cerdo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pauline epistles</span> Books of the New Testament attributed to Paul the Apostle

The Pauline epistles, also known as Epistles of Paul or Letters of Paul, are the thirteen books of the New Testament attributed to Paul the Apostle, although the authorship of some is in dispute. Among these epistles are some of the earliest extant Christian documents. They provide an insight into the beliefs and controversies of early Christianity. As part of the canon of the New Testament, they are foundational texts for both Christian theology and ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudepigrapha</span> Falsely attributed works

Pseudepigrapha are falsely attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past. The name of the author to whom the work is falsely attributed is often prefixed with the particle "pseudo-", such as for example "pseudo-Aristotle" or "pseudo-Dionysius": these terms refer to the anonymous authors of works falsely attributed to Aristotle and Dionysius the Areopagite, respectively.

The Apostolic Fathers, also known as the Ante-Nicene Fathers, were core Christian theologians among the Church Fathers who lived in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD who are believed to have personally known some of the Twelve Apostles or to have been significantly influenced by them. Their writings, though widely circulated in early Christianity, were not included in the canon of the New Testament. Many of the writings derive from the same time period and geographical location as other works of early Christian literature which came to be part of the New Testament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pauline Christianity</span> Form of Christianity developed from the doctrines of the Apostle Paul

Pauline Christianity or Pauline theology, otherwise referred to as Gentile Christianity, is the theology and form of Christianity which developed from the beliefs and doctrines espoused by the Hellenistic-Jewish Apostle Paul through his writings and those New Testament writings traditionally attributed to him. Paul's beliefs were rooted in the earliest Jewish Christianity, but they deviated from this Jewish Christianity in their emphasis on inclusion of the Gentiles into God's New Covenant and in his rejection of circumcision as an unnecessary token of upholding the Mosaic Law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Testament apocrypha</span> Writings by early Christians, not included in the Biblical Canon

The New Testament apocrypha are a number of writings by early Christians that give accounts of Jesus and his teachings, the nature of God, or the teachings of his apostles and of their lives. Some of these writings were cited as scripture by early Christians, but since the fifth century a widespread consensus has emerged limiting the New Testament to the 27 books of the modern canon. Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Protestant churches generally do not view the New Testament apocrypha as part of the Bible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authorship of the Pauline epistles</span> New Testament works attributed to Paul the Apostle

The Pauline epistles are the thirteen books in the New Testament traditionally attributed to Paul the Apostle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acts of Paul and Thecla</span> Apocryphal story of Paul the apostles influence on a young virgin named Thecla

The Acts of Paul and Thecla is an apocryphal text describing Paul the Apostle's influence on a young virgin named Thecla. It is one of the writings of the New Testament apocrypha. Edgar J. Goodspeed called it a "religious romance"

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christ myth theory</span> Fringe theory claiming that a historical Jesus did not exist

The Christ myth theory, also known as the Jesus myth theory, Jesus mythicism, or the Jesus ahistoricity theory, is the fringe theory that the story of Jesus is a work of mythology with no historical substance. Alternatively, in terms given by Bart Ehrman paraphrasing Earl Doherty, it is the view that "the historical Jesus did not exist. Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Literary forgery</span> Literary work which is either deliberately misattributed to a historical or invented author

Literary forgery is writing, such as a manuscript or a literary work, which is either deliberately misattributed to a historical or invented author, or is a purported memoir or other presumably nonfictional writing deceptively presented as true when, in fact, it presents untrue or imaginary information or content.

The Epistle to the Alexandrians is a pseudepigraphical Epistle attributed to Paul the Apostle that is mentioned in the Muratorian fragment, one of the earliest lists of the canonical texts of the New Testament. The anonymous author of the Muratorian canon considered this epistle as spurious, along with the Epistle to the Laodiceans, and both of them are stated to have been "forged in Paul's name to [further] the heresy of Marcion." Its text has been lost and nothing is known about its content.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews</span> Question in biblical authorship

The Epistle to the Hebrews of the Christian Bible is one of the New Testament books whose canonicity was disputed. Traditionally, Paul the Apostle was thought to be the author. However, since the third century this has been questioned, and the consensus among most modern scholars is that the author is unknown.

Historiography of early Christianity is the study of historical writings about early Christianity, which is the period before the First Council of Nicaea in 325. Historians have used a variety of sources and methods in exploring and describing Christianity during this time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sources for the historicity of Jesus</span> Sources about Jesus as a historical figure

Christian sources such as the New Testament books in the Christian Bible, include detailed accounts about Jesus, but scholars differ on the historicity of specific episodes described in the biblical accounts of Jesus. The only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Hine 2017, p. 26
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Ehrman 2012, p. 533–535
  3. ↑ Elliott 1993, p. 549
  4. ↑ Ehrman, Bart (2003). Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make it into the New Testament. United States: Oxford University Press. p. 167–170. ISBN   0-19-514182-2.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Lightfoot 1892, p. 318–319
  6. ↑ Elliott 1993, p. 552
  7. ↑ Hine 2017, p. 28
  8. ↑ Jerome (1999) [392]. On Illustrious Men. The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation. Translated by Halton, Thomas P. Catholic University of America Press. pp. 26–27. doi:10.2307/j.ctt2853x3. ISBN   0-8132-0100-4.
  9. ↑ James, Montague Rhodes (1924). The Apocryphal New Testament  . Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 480 – via Wikisource. [ scan   Wikisource-logo.svg ]
  10. 1 2 3 4 Elliott 1993, p. 547
  11. 1 2 Kurfess 1965, p. 134
  12. ↑ Briones & Dodson 2017, p. 3; Hines 2017, p. 36–38. See Acts 18:1–17
  13. ↑ Lightfoot 1892, p. 286–288
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Ehrman 2012, p. 535–539
  15. ↑ Lightfoot 1892, p. 317
  16. ↑ Hines 2017, p. 29
  17. ↑ Kurfess 1965, p. 135
  18. ↑ Hines 2017, p. 30–31
  19. ↑ Hines 2017, p. 41–43. See Ramelli, Ilaria L'epistolario apocrifo Seneca-San Paolo in Vetera Christianorum 34, 1997, p. 299–310.
  20. ↑ Marta Sordi, Seneca e i Cristiani, in Amicitiae templa serena, Vita e Pensiero, series "Ricerche. Letteratura greca e latina", 2008, p. 1503 (miscellany). ISBN   9788834313978. As quoted in Gian Enrico Manzoni (January 15, 2009). "San Paolo e Seneca si incontrarono?" [Di Saint Paul and Seneca meet?] (in Italian). L'Avvenire. the correspondence was believed to be authentic during late antiquity and the Middle Ages: it thus ranged from the testimony of Saint Jerome (who in 392 wrote that the letters between the two great men circulated and were read by many people) to that of intellectuals such as Albertino Mussato and Boccaccio, who had no doubts both about the authenticity and the Christian faith of Seneca.
  21. ↑ Briones & Dodson 2017, p. 7
  22. ↑ Elliott 1993, p. 553
  23. ↑ Barlow, Claude, Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam, 1938, p. 92. Cited in Ehrman 2012, p. 536.
  24. ↑ Schaff, Philip (1858). "St. Paul and the Conversion of the Gentiles". History of the Christian Church. Vol. 1. Section I, Sub.2.
  25. ↑ Lightfoot 1892, p. 250

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.