Fiat CR.20

Last updated
CR.20
Fiat C.R.20 Aviano, 1936.jpg
Role Fighter
Manufacturer Fiat
Designer Celestino Rosatelli
First flight19 June 1926
Primary users Regia Aeronautica
Lithuanian Air Force
Hungarian Air Force
Number builtc. 250 CR.20
c. 46 CR.20 Idro
c. 235 CR.20bis
c. 204 CR.20 Asso

The Fiat CR.20 was a biplane fighter designed and produced by the Italian aircraft manufacturer Fiat. It represented an intermediate step from the early biplane CR.1 and the later, successful series CR.30, CR.32 and CR.42. [1]

Contents

Development of the CR.20 was headed by the aeronautical engineer Celestino Rosatelli, who selected a traditional sesquiplane configuration. The engine was a water-cooled 306 kW (410 hp) Fiat A.20 V-12 engine. [2] Major variants were the CR.20 Idro, a pontoon floatplane, and the CR.20 Asso, using a more powerful (336 kW/450 hp) Isotta Fraschini engine. CR.20bis, produced from 1930, differed from the original version only with the addition of a more advanced landing gear.[ citation needed ]

Design and development

The Fiat CR.20 was a sesquiplane fighter that possessed considerable military, aerodynamic, and static characteristics at the time of its introduction. [3] It featured an all-metal framework that comprised both steel and various light metals while the exterior covering was of fireproof fabric, except for the front part of the fuselage close to the engine, which was instead covered by duralumin sheeting. [3] The surface of the fuselage was relatively streamlined, which was obtained via the use of duralumin ribs and tubes that directly supported the fabric covering. [4] The pilot was seated relatively high up in relation to the top of the fuselage; this placement provided an ample field of vision both above and below the upper wing. Overall, the aircraft had a relatively compact form, which had the benefit of minimising inertia in all directions and thus bolstering its manoeuvrability. [5]

The wings were rigidly-braced, staggered, and had a dihedral. [3] The number of wing struts was intentionally minimised as to reduce the drag incurred as well as to simplify the mounting. The ribs employed an arrangement of triangular bracing composed of thin duralumin tubes while the wing spars formed box girders, consisting of two metal strips that were riveted together. [3] shearing stresses were adequately distributed by the twin spar webs, the flanges of which extended along the entire length of the spars and were reinforced at certain points. The stress distribution was designed to require the least possible variation in the cross section of the spars to form a girder of near uniform strength. [6] The wing struts were composed of sheet metal in a conventional manner and possessed an aspect ratio of 2.5, as was then typically used on Fiat-built aircraft. The three struts forming each half of the cabane were joined in a manner that imposed no obstruction to the aircraft's cockpit. [4]

The fuselage framework consisted of four longerons, composed of steel, that were connected via a combination of transverse frames and triangular bracing. [4] The structure of the fuselage's forward section of the fuselage effectively terminated at the second bulkhead, that beyond effectively being a projecting bracket. The mounting for the engine was relatively simplistic in terms of its design; however, attention was paid to providing good accessibility for various elements, including the magnetos, water, fuel, and oil pumps and most aspects of the power plant. [4] No bracing was present between the lower longerons due to the location of the fuel tank; instead, the horizontal girders continued through to the lower wing to join securely with the fuselage. The honeycomb radiator, which was located within the forward fuselage, used specialised elastic supports that avoided any vibration-related disturbances. [4] The air passages of the radiator were arranged to facilitate maximum airflow, and thus the most efficient cooling, while the aircraft was climbing. The pilot could exercise control of the radiator via a shutter. [7]

The powerplant was a Fiat A.20 V-12 water-cooled piston engine, which was capable of routinely producing 410 hp. [8] It drove a twin-bladed fixed-pitch propeller that was relatively efficient and had a high revolution speed. This arrangement was partially attributable for the flying qualities of the aircraft, such as its ability to achieve relatively high speeds for the era. [8] The speed of the engine enabled the attainment of a high specific power despite a relatively small bulk. The front end of the engine was specifically shaped to facilitate the installation of the radiator and thus achieve optimal efficacy, weight, and bulk, as well as protection of vulnerable elements from enemy fire. [8] The twin double-spark high-tension magnetos were located aft of the engine and were relatively easily to inspect. A specialised starter, assisted by starting magnetos, was also present. [8]

The armament consisted of four machine guns, all being located within the fuselage. [8] Two of these fired through the propeller arc as they were situated quite close to the pilot and featured an orthodox installation. The other two machine guns were mounted on the either side of the fuselage at the height of the longeron that supported the engine. [8] The ammunition boxes, which were located on the sides of, and underneath, the engine cowling, were suitably protected. [9] The aircraft possessed a relatively large carrying capacity. [10]

Considerable attention was paid to maximising the safety of the aircraft across various aspects, as well as to avoid necessitating high piloting skills to operate it. [5] To minimise the risk of an onboard fire, the pilot was able to direct the aircraft's detachable fuel tank to be dropped. Furthermore, a fire wall separated the engine from the rest of the fuselage. [5] Torque was corrected against by making the left half-cell somewhat longer than the right. Moreover, every couple of gyration was offset via a suitable orientation of the axis of traction without causing drift. [5] Special attention was paid to the positioning of both the fuel and oil tanks with respect to the vertical line that passed through the aircraft's centre of gravity, as well as the location of the landing gear in order to lessen the tendency to capsize on rough ground. The angle of attack was such as to achieve maximum lift and therefore to minimise the aircraft's landing speed. [5] Despite these measures, the CR.20 was readily capable of performing various acrobatic manoeuvres and also possessed relatively high horizontal and climbing speeds. [11]

Operational history

During September 1926, official testing of the CR.20 was performed at Montecelio; various aspects of the aircraft, including its manoeuvrability, ease of operation, responsive controls, and perfect equilibrium in flight, were commonly identified by early pilots. [12]

By 1933, the CR.20 had reached its operational peak, equipping 27 squadrons of the Italian Regia Aeronautica . The aircraft engaged in combat against Libyan rebels as well as during the early stages of the Second Italo-Abyssinian War in the attack role. [13] The CR.20s remained in service with the Regia Aeronautica in the aerobatics and training through much of the 1930s.

In 1933, Italy sold five CR.20s to Paraguay, which was fighting the Chaco War against Bolivia. Thus, these aircraft served as Paraguay's only fighters through to the end of the conflict. [14]

Variants

Operators

Flag of Austria.svg  Austria
Flag of Hungary (1915-1918, 1919-1946).svg  Hungary
Flag of Italy (1861-1946) crowned.svg  Kingdom of Italy
Flag of Lithuania 1918-1940.svg Lithuania
Flag of Paraguay.svg  Paraguay
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland
Flag of Spain.svg  Spain
Flag of the Soviet Union.svg  Soviet Union

Specifications (CR.20)

Fiat CR.20 3-view drawing from NACA Aircraft Circular No.43 Fiat CR.20 3-view NACA Aircraft Circular No.43.jpg
Fiat CR.20 3-view drawing from NACA Aircraft Circular No.43

Data fromThe Complete Book of Fighters, [17] National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics [18]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dewoitine D.500</span> 1932 French fighter aircraft

The Dewoitine D.500 was an all-metal, open-cockpit, fixed-undercarriage monoplane fighter aircraft designed and produced by French aircraft manufacturer Dewoitine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avia BH-21</span> Type of aircraft

The Avia BH-21 was a fighter biplane designed and produced by the Czechoslovakian aircraft manufacturer Avia. First flown in January 1925, it served an important role in securing Czechoslovak national security during the Interwar period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ANF Les Mureaux 113</span> Type of aircraft

The ANF Les Mureaux 110 and its derivatives were a family of all-metal military reconnaissance aircraft developed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer ANF Les Mureaux.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bartel BM 6</span> Type of aircraft

The Bartel BM 6 was a Polish biplane trainer fighter aircraft of 1930. It did not advance beyond the prototype stage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blériot 127</span> Type of aircraft

The Blériot 127 was a monoplane bomber aircraft developed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Blériot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.165</span> Italian biplane fighter prototype

The Caproni Ca.165 was an Italian biplane fighter developed just before World War II, but produced only as a prototype, as the competing Fiat CR.42 Falco was selected for series production.

The Caproni Ca.97 was a utility monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the Italian aircraft manufacturer Caproni. It had a range of powerplant arrangements, the aircraft could be flown with many as three radial engines, however, many were build with only the nose engine present or with only the two nacelle-mounted engines.

The Dewoitine D.33 was a single-engine low-wing all-metal monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Dewoitine. It is best remembered for setting a long-distance world record on its maiden flight in 1930.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fiat AS.1</span> Type of aircraft

The Fiat AS.1 was a light touring monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the Italian aircraft manufacturer Fiat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanriot H.43</span> Type of aircraft

The Hanriot H.43 was a military utility biplane designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Hanriot. It was primarily used by the Aéronautique Militaire as a trainer aircraft during the interwar period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polikarpov I-3</span> Soviet Polikarpov biplane fighter

The Polikarpov I-3 was a Soviet fighter designed during the late 1920s. It entered service in 1929, but was retired in 1935 with the advent of fighters with higher performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Potez 39</span> Type of aircraft

The Potez 39 was a twin-seat single-engined parasol wing monoplane aerial reconnaissance and observation aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Potez. It was the company's first all-metal aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lioré et Olivier LeO H-190</span> Type of aircraft

The Lioré et Olivier H-190 was a biplane flying boat aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Lioré et Olivier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avia 51</span> Type of aircraft

The Avia 51 was a trimotor monoplane commercial transport. It was designed by Robert Nebesář and built by the Czechoslovakian aircraft manufacturer Avia. The type proved to be uneconomical in use and thus only three aircraft were ever built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.90</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.90 was a prototype heavy bomber designed and built by the Italian aircraft manufacturer Caproni. At the time of its maiden flight on 13 October 1929, it was the largest land-based aircraft then extant in the world; the First World War-era Siemens-Schuckert R.VIII having been slightly larger. Only the one Ca.90 was ever built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bréguet 410</span> Type of aircraft

The Bréguet 410 was an all-metal sesquiplane biplane bomber that was designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Bréguet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanriot H.31</span> Type of aircraft

The Hanriot H.31 was a single engine, single seat French biplane fighter aircraft built in 1925 to compete in a government programme. It was not successful and only one prototype was completed.

The Lioré et Olivier LeO 8, Lioré et Olivier LeO 8-Cau 2 or Lioré et Olivier LeO 8 CAN 2 was a French two seat, parasol wing monoplane night fighter and reconnaissance aircraft, built in 1923.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Les Mureaux 3</span> Type of aircraft

The Les Mureaux 3 C.2 and Les Mureaux 4 C.2 were French two seat, parasol winged fighters, flown in 1927-8, which differed only in their engines. They were developed into near identical army co-operation types, the ANF Les Mureaux 130 A.2 and ANF Les Mureaux 131 A.2, in 1929–31.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.95</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.95 was a large, three engine, long range, heavy bomber prototype built in Italy in 1929. It could carry a 1,600 kg (3,500 lb) bomb load and had three defensive gun positions. Only one was built.

References

  1. "Fiat Cr.20". militaryfactory.com. Retrieved 19 February 2024.
  2. "Fiat CR.20". historyofwar.org.
  3. 1 2 3 4 NACA 1927, p. 1.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1927, p. 2.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1927, p. 4.
  6. NACA 1927, pp. 1-2.
  7. NACA 1927, pp. 2-3.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 NACA 1927, p. 3.
  9. NACA 1927, pp. 3-4.
  10. NACA 1927, p. 5.
  11. NACA 1927, pp. 4-5.
  12. NACA 1927, pp. 5-6.
  13. Taylor 1981, pp. 54–55.
  14. von Rauch 1976, pp. 210–211.
  15. "Fiat CR.20". Plieno sparnai (in Lithuanian).
  16. 1 2 "Fiat CR.20". Airwar.ru (in Russian).
  17. Green and Swanborough 1990, p. 205.
  18. NACA 1927, pp. 5-9.
  19. Angelucci 1983, p. 124.
  20. Taylor 1981, p. 54.

Bibliography